Poll of the Day > Guy gets caught on tape Shooting a Wisconsin Protesters! (GRAPHIC)

(+) Yeah! (+)

https://twitter.com/i/status/1298502384654651392

And Cops just rolled past him!

so he absolutely killed that guy, right?

---

Oh my god neo-nazis going through the streets armed gunning people down and cops just tell him to get out of the road and go on by?

inb4 right wingers insist the entire crowd he fired at was in a berserk weed fueled fury and that the shooter was only guilty of heroically defending the innocent life of a nearby suburb

---

thats about as clear cut of a justifiable shooting as you can get caught on camera including the third person shot in that moment who pulls a gun on him before getting it in the arm. everything surrounding that event might be what fucks him, but not the shooting itself.

Dark_Spiret posted...

thats about as clear cut of a justifiable shooting as you can get caught on camera including the third person shot in that moment who pulls a gun on him before getting it in the arm. everything surrounding that event might be what fucks him, but not the shooting itself.

Bull shit

You don't get to kill someone then call subsequent shots justified because the later shots are being fired at people trying to take you down for murder.

Also the video sounds like there is at least one additonal shooter so there could have been a group of left leaning centrists there. I heard the shooter has fled the state and is facing extradition to face charges for first degree murder in wisconsin gonna see if I can find an article.

Well, if Trump's victory wasn't already guaranteed, these riots just ensured it.

RedPixel posted...

Well, if Trump's victory wasn't already guaranteed, these riots just ensured it.

Trumpsters in the streets gunning people down is really going to help him >.>

Not exactly smart to chase down and beat an armed dude. What other outcome could have possibly resulted?

---

I think the fact hes 17 running around shooting people is really gonna be a damper.

BlackScythe0 posted... You don't get to kill someone then call subsequent shots justified because the later shots are being fired at people trying to take you down for murder.

and people dont get to chase down someone with a gun then claim victim-hood when they get shot. it wasnt even a stand your ground case, he was actively trying to flee at both instances. the first person he shot was obviously throwing something at him while he was already being chased by a group of people. the others he was about to get pummeled over while on the ground including a third guy who pulls a pistol on him while first acting like he was about to back off.

as i said whats going to get him is everything surrounding what happened.

Dark_Spiret posted...

thats about as clear cut of a justifiable shooting as you can get caught on camera including the third person shot in that moment who pulls a gun on him before getting it in the arm. everything surrounding that event might be what fucks him, but not the shooting itself.

If a person just shot someone, and someone else tried to disarm the shooter, they would be (and should be) considered a hero in normal circumstances.

---

Dark_Spiret posted...

and people dont get to chase down someone with a gun then claim victim-hood when they get shot. it wasnt even a stand your ground case, he was actively trying to flee at both instances. the first person he shot was obviously throwing something at him while he was already being chased by a group of people. the others he was about to get pummeled over while on the ground including a third guy who pulls a pistol on him while first acting like was about to back off.

as i said whats going to get him is everything surrounding what happened.

The video does not show the beginning of the event. You are acting like it contains the entirety.

Yeah, he came from out of state, shot someone down the street.. Then when people realized it was him they tried to stop him and he shot two more people. He killed two people. The cops told him thanks for coming out and gave him a bottle of water.

---

You mean a criminal was lost in the confusion of large groups in the streets? It's almost like having large crowds in the streets makes it harder for law enforcement to do their jobs or whatever. And how crazy is it that protests against law enforcement wind up impeding law enforcement?

BlackScythe0 posted...

Oh my god neo-nazis going through the streets armed gunning people down and cops just tell him to get out of the road and go on by?

Now this guy we literally know nothing about is a Neo-Nazi?

Dark_Spiret posted...

thats about as clear cut of a justifiable shooting as you can get caught on camera including the third person shot in that moment who pulls a gun on him before getting it in the arm. everything surrounding that event might be what fucks him, but not the shooting itself.

Well, he did get assaulted, but Wisconsin isn't a SYG state so... he might be justified for the person who pulled a gun on him (although the lack of SYG could mean he might need to just get shot to death by the guy with the gun rather than be able to defend himself, at which point the police may or may not solve his murder)

BlackScythe0 posted...

You don't get to kill someone then call subsequent shots justified because the later shots are being fired at people trying to take you down for murder.

The claim of a murder is based on what? Somebody shouting in the video?

---

BlackScythe0 posted... The video does not show the beginning of the event. You are acting like it contains the entirety.

and the footage doesnt show what you want to believe. im basing it all on what we've seen so far.
Zeus posted...

Well, he did get assaulted, but Wisconsin isn't a SYG state

No its not, but it doesnt matter in this context. he was actively trying to run away both times with the second being flat on his back being assaulted before opening fire while still on the ground. there is no fleeing at that point.

Zeus posted...

The claim of a murder is based on what? Somebody shouting in the video?

The police. The kid was apparently part of a group of left leaning centrists in front of a gas station looking for a fight. He apparently wasn't the only one shooting from what I've read, but he is the one being charged with first degree murder.

Dark_Spiret posted...
and the footage doesnt show what you want to believe. im basing it all on what we've seen so far.

You are attempting, despite all information available, to argue that there is no reason they were chasing him they were just chasing a heavily armed psychopath for funsies and then had no clue it was dangerous and were shocked it resulted in getting shot.

Jen0125 posted...

Yeah, he came from out of state, shot someone down the street.. Then when people realized it was him they tried to stop him and he shot two more people. He killed two people. The cops told him thanks for coming out and gave him a bottle of water.

So maddening. Even in the best-case fantasy scenario where he was 100% justified in shooting people as self-defense, the police would still be immediately holding him, since they don't have a way of knowing if it was in self-defense or not at the time. The fact that he was able to walk towards the police, occasionally touching his long gun, and the police not only don't shoot him, but don't even arrest him and let him leave the state, fucking tells you all you need to know.

---

https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/2020/08/26/wisconsin-police-shooting-jacob-blake-live-updates-kenosha/3441808001/

Caught him and charged with homicide.
He tried to flee back to Illinois

---

It really is amazing how quickly the conservasquad start spinning a fictional web to distract from reality

theyre re incredibly well trained

---

BlackScythe0 posted...

The police. The kid was apparently part of a group of left leaning centrists in front of a gas station looking for a fight. He apparently wasn't the only one shooting from what I've read, but he is the one being charged with first degree murder.

Does you ever tired of your shitty gimmick of trying to lump everybody not in your kooky far-left fanatical side into one camp? Because everybody else is tired of your "They don't think Bernie Sanders doesn't go far enough and refuse to support laws preventing people from being billionaires, therefore they have to be ____!" bullshit.

More importantly, there were cops ALL OVER the fucking place. The decision for random citizens to involve themselves at all was unjustified because they could just pointed the alleged shooter (and I notice that you provided zero citations for your claim) out to the millions of cops, all of whom were more qualified than some fucking idiots trying to take the law into their own hands. And what do you think would have happened if the vigilante who had a gun had actually shot and killed the suspect? He'd be on trial for murder himself (or worse, if it was an unregistered pistol), because Wisconsin isn't a SYG state... and that's assuming that the cops didn't see him killing the suspect and wind up shooting him.

---

EvilMegas posted...

https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/2020/08/26/wisconsin-police-shooting-jacob-blake-live-updates-kenosha/3441808001/

Caught him and charged with homicide.
He tried to flee back to Illinois

So funny how whenever it is someone 'protecting local businesses' that end up getting violent, its someone who isn't even from there.

---

Zeus posted...

Does you ever tired of your shitty gimmick of trying to lump everybody not in your kooky far-left fanatical side into one camp? Because everybody else is tired of your "They don't think Bernie Sanders doesn't go far enough and refuse to support laws preventing people from being billionaires, therefore they have to be ____!" bullshit.

More importantly, there were cops ALL OVER the fucking place. The decision for random citizens to involve themselves at all was unjustified because they could just pointed the alleged shooter (and I notice that you provided zero citations for your claim) out to the millions of cops, all of whom were more qualified than some fucking idiots trying to take the law into their own hands. And what do you think would have happened if the vigilante who had a gun had actually shot and killed the suspect? He'd be on trial for murder himself (or worse, if it was an unregistered pistol), because Wisconsin isn't a SYG state... and that's assuming that the cops didn't see him killing the suspect and wind up shooting him.

All information I have seen suggests people are going after an active shooter. Not pursuing someone who was not a threat. You can strongly feel that people shouldn't care to stand up to your chosen ones, but people have a right to defend themselves and others. Sometimes it doesn't always work out for the best.

And I'm definitely not the most liberal person here, I was recently modded for expressing what has become a "conservative" view point.

I almost wish I hadnt asked Zeus to block me. Some of his apeshit remarks and theories are actually pretty entertaining.

Dark_Spiret posted...

...he was actively trying to flee at both instances.

gee, i can't imagine why, ok?

---

BlackScythe0 posted...

All information I have seen suggests people are going after an active shooter.

All the information you keep claiming but, other than the video, nobody else has seen. And it's kind of curious that you keep referencing things you refuse to actually link a citation for. It's almost like BS0 is engaging in some more BS.

BlackScythe0 posted...

Not pursuing someone who was not a threat.

If somebody is fleeing the scene of a crime, they're obviously not an immediate threat. And if there are a million cops around who could ACTUALLY handle the situation, there's literally nothing to be gained from trying to save 30 seconds by taking the law into your own hands ESPECIALLY because their fuck-ups let the guy get away. Had they not assaulted him, they could pointed the cops right to him.

BlackScythe0 posted...

You can strongly feel that people shouldn't care to stand up to your chosen ones, but people have a right to defend themselves and others.

>Standing up
>Defending yourself

Make up for your mind. More importantly, some of the people depicted running at him only started *after* he ran by so they had no connection to the original incident... and that's assuming there was an original incident which you still have refused to show and nothing is referenced in the Twitter video.

BlackScythe0 posted...

And I'm definitely not the most liberal person here

You mean you're just a center-far-leftist instead of a far-far-leftist? XD Not that you went to any effort of addressing your tendency to clump everybody who isn't as far to the left as you into one camp, because your far-left views weren't the meat of that remark.


---

Jen0125 posted...

Yeah, he came from out of state, shot someone down the street.. Then when people realized it was him they tried to stop him and he shot two more people. He killed two people. The cops told him thanks for coming out and gave him a bottle of water.

This is what happened, it's all on video. The cops also let him get away.

Zeus posted...

More importantly, there were cops ALL OVER the fucking place. The decision for random citizens to involve themselves at all was unjustified because they could just pointed the alleged shooter

They did, and the cops let him get away. He crossed state lines before he was caught. This is why you should keep your mouth shut when you don't know the story.

Anyway, conservatives will never miss an opportunity to defend a murderer as long as the victim was a minority or someone exercising their right to protest.

---

Dark_Spiret posted...

thats about as clear cut of a justifiable shooting as you can get caught on camera including the third person shot in that moment who pulls a gun on him before getting it in the arm. everything surrounding that event might be what fucks him, but not the shooting itself.

You're out of your fucking mind, nothing about this is justifiable

---

They did, and the cops let him get away.

No, the idiots who attacked him instead of bringing the police into it let him get away. There were cops up and down that block. If ONE PERSON had been able to put aside their hatred for the police to talk to them, they could have arrested him then and there. Instead you have police going down a crowded street with no idea of what just happened let alone any idea of what allegedly happened before that.

And that's not even getting into the fact that the crowded, chaotic streets in general impede law enforcement's ability to identify and pursue suspects.

This is why you should keep your mouth shut when you don't know the story.

If you'd so kindly follow your own advice, we'd never see you post again and the boards would be the better for it.

Anyway, conservatives

ie, the old "Anybody who disagrees with my nonsense is a conservative". Granted, if you only know one song, you have to sing it all the time.

---

Zeus posted...

No, the idiots who attacked him instead of bringing the police into it let him get away. There were cops up and down that block. If ONE PERSON had been able to put aside their hatred for the police to talk to them

As I said, you shouldn't open your mouth when you don't know the story. I've been following what happened all night; the protesters DID inform the police and the police let him go anyway. Furthermore, after letting him go, the police failed to identify the shooter about 10 hours after social media had already done so.

And that's not even getting into the fact that the crowded, chaotic streets in general impede law enforcement's ability to identify and pursue suspects.

A suspect that was pointed out to them and was wearing blue rubber gloves to hide evidence and carrying a rifle in a bright green shirt fleeing the scene. He was later identified by leftists on social media, but it was almost ten hours later that law enforcement did the same.
But this is also ignoring the fact that we live in the age of the spree/mass shooter, and that this level of police incompetence during an active shooter situation is inexcusable no matter how much seeing dead people you disagree with gives you joy, Zeus.

If you'd so kindly follow your own advice, we'd never see you post again and the boards would be the better for it.

Lol, what a baby.

ie, the old "Anybody who disagrees with my nonsense is a conservative".

I'd forgotten you claim to be an enlightened centrist like Tim Pool and Rubin, lol. It's almost like all you do is say conservative shit.

---

madadude posted...

If a person just shot someone, and someone else tried to disarm the shooter, they would be (and should be) considered a hero in normal circumstances.

Not when theyre also a part of the mob. Dont pretend the guy was just walking by and decided to play hero.

Mead posted...

It really is amazing how quickly the conservasquad start spinning a fictional web to distract from reality

theyre re incredibly well trained

I mean, can you really blame them? The taste of boot is so delicious.

---

papercup posted... You're out of your fucking mind, nothing about this is justifiable

one person looks like might have thrown a molotov cocktail at him and continued to rush him (with many others right behind them) causing him to shoot them. this is the only part that could be deemed as sketchy depending on what was actually thrown at him and what he perceived it was.

you then have a mob of people rush him again and start to kick and beat him while hes down on the ground with running not being an option any more. shoots two more, but only those two who are still on top of him.

you then have him shoot a 4th person in the arm who just faked "surrendered" then pulled a pistol on him.

in terms of the actual shootings a good lawyer can easily get him off on self defense. the really big hurdle is everything else surrounding it like the age of owning the rifle, out of state living ect.

Zeus posted...

"Anybody who disagrees with my nonsense is a conservative".

Considering this board is swarming with ANTIFA cocksuckers......yeah, that's the mantra.

---

Dark_Spiret posted...

You're out of your fucking mind, nothing about this is justifiable

one person looks like might have thrown a molotov cocktail at him and continued to rush him (with many others right behind them) causing him to shoot them. this is the only part that could be deemed as sketchy depending on what was actually thrown at him and what he perceived it was.

you then have a mob of people rush him again and start to kick and beat him while hes down on the ground with running not being an option any more. shoots two more, but only those two who are still on top of him.

you then have him shoot a 4th person in the arm who just faked "surrendered" then pulled a pistol on him.

in terms of the actual shootings a good lawyer can easily get him off on self defense. the really big hurdle is everything else surrounding it like the age of owning the rifle, out of state living ect.

Wow, I don't know what video you're watching, but it sounds way more interesting than this one.

---

Dark_Spiret posted...

thats about as clear cut of a justifiable shooting as you can get caught on camera including the third person shot in that moment who pulls a gun on him before getting it in the arm. everything surrounding that event might be what fucks him, but not the shooting itself.

if you watch closely he shot and killed the wrong guy. the attacker punched him down then immediately the shooter gets up and just shoots in the direction of the attacker who is fleeing but instead hits another guy

If the kid shot someone earlier unprovoked then fuck him

but if he was getting attacked by the mob for no reason, then he kinda did what he had to do even though his being there at all is fucking stupid and the last guy he shot did pull a gun on him

https://imgur.com/a/aNthOvN

---

waterdeepchu posted...

Wow, I don't know what video you're watching, but it sounds way more interesting than this one.

Smarkil posted...

If the kid shot someone earlier unprovoked then fuck him

https://twitter.com/dommyblanco/status/1298502766478929921
https://twitter.com/dommyblanco/status/1298520199386234881
https://twitter.com/anoncatanoncat/status/1298524321430884352

For the record, chasing him towards the police probably saved people's lives. This guy is a classic case of would-be mass shooter, but chasing him towards the cops ensured that he wouldn't be able to fire non-stop at the crowd and that once he was in the area of the cops, he'd be too much of a coward to continue aggression. There is also the matter of citizen's arrest, but they didn't manage it, so... *shrug* Either way, interfering with this fuck's ability to shoot too many people was the right decision.

---

Smarkil posted...

If the kid shot someone earlier unprovoked then fuck him

but if he was getting attacked by the mob for no reason, then he kinda did what he had to do even though his being there at all is fucking stupid and the last guy he shot did pull a gun on him

https://imgur.com/a/aNthOvN

This is why the idea of everyone carrying a gun for deterrence is fucking idiotic. Someone shoots someone, people shoot back, people who don't know who started it shoot eachother, everyone gets shot.

---

Gaawa_chan posted...

There are multiple clips. Stop being lazy and go look this shit up.

I mean if youre calling other posters lazy why not post some of these clips you claim to have seen, unless thats too much work for ya

---

Smarkil posted...

If the kid shot someone earlier unprovoked then fuck him

but if he was getting attacked by the mob for no reason, then he kinda did what he had to do even though his being there at all is fucking stupid and the last guy he shot did pull a gun on him

https://imgur.com/a/aNthOvN

Yes, I'm pretty sure people are attacking a gun wielding man in an open area just cause.

---

Can't wait to leave this shithole country

---

Mead posted...

I mean if youre calling other posters lazy why not post some of these clips you claim to have seen, unless thats too much work for ya

I have to leave for work in a couple minutes, but here are a few I managed to find; I went looking for them as soon as I posted that.

https://twitter.com/dommyblanco/status/1298502766478929921
https://twitter.com/dommyblanco/status/1298520199386234881
https://twitter.com/anoncatanoncat/status/1298524321430884352

---

Kotenks posted...

You have open carry at 17? I never knew that. Can't smoke. Can't drink. But open carry is legal?

He also crossed state lines with it. But I think the murder is a little more important.

---

Kotenks posted...

You have open carry at 17? I never knew that. Can't smoke. Can't drink. But open carry is legal?

No, you can't.

---

So, is he an actual Nazi or it's just blackscythe being a leftist?

---

Kotenks posted...

You have open carry at 17? I never knew that. Can't smoke. Can't drink. But open carry is legal?

This is a good point. Didn't even think of this. Looking up the Wisconsin law, "Any person under 18 years of age who possesses or goes armed with a dangerous weapon is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor."

the exception only applies to when the weapon "is being used in target practice under the supervision of an adult or in a course of instruction"

so yeah, at the VERY LEAST, he is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor

---

I figured this was going to happen sooner or later.

---