Current Events > With Supreme Court Justice Kennedy Gone, Abortion and Gay Rights Are Next

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
KhanJohnny 06/27/18 5:58:10 PM #202:	DarkTransient posted... KhanJohnny posted... Yeah evidence that they might have similar brains in some way or another, is very strong evidence that they can feel like the other sex, but to say that it makes them the other sex, presumes that we base our definition of male and female on the basis of what your brain looks like. That has never been the case in Western history, nor do I think that it should logically be the case now. Again, science does not provide the answer for how we define man and woman. Basically, what's going on is that the body's sex, doesn't match the brain's sex. You're ultimately saying "the body is right". But arguably, wouldn't the brain be more critical to determining one's identity than the body? Imo no. Because this is not a question of identity at all. And making it about identity, actually renders the concept of gender incomprehensible, because we no longer have a consistent definition for what a man or woman is, because there are no longer any identifiable traits for what those words mean. Man or woman no longer means person with testes or ovaries, but instead become traitless words. If you were to look into a dictionary written by progressives, the entry for man would read "A person who identifies as a man". <cite>KhanJohnny posted [p:904080569] in With Supre... [t:76755858]...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KhanJohnny posted...</cite> <quote>Yeah evidence that they might have similar brains in some way or another, is very strong evidence that they can feel like the other sex, but to say that it makes them the other sex, presumes that we base our definition of male and female on the basis of what your brain looks like. That has never been the case in Western history, nor do I think that it should logically be the case now. Again, science does not provide the answer for how we define man and woman.</quote> Basically, what's going on is that the body's sex, doesn't match the brain's sex. You're ultimately saying "the body is right". But arguably, wouldn't the brain be more critical to determining one's identity than the body?</quote> Imo no. Because this is not a question of identity at all. And making it about identity, actually renders the concept of gender incomprehensible, because we no longer have a consistent definition for what a man or woman is, because there are no longer any identifiable traits for what those words mean. Man or woman no longer means person with testes or ovaries, but instead become traitless words. If you were to look into a dictionary written by progressives, the entry for man would read "A person who identifies as a man".</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DarkTransient 06/27/18 5:59:07 PM #203:	Conflict posted... Pro-lifers are universally immature and unable to grasp several concepts 1. Women having the right to their own body 2. Most terminated pregnancies are not for "shits and giggles". Health reasons and generally not being able to afford it. Not being able to afford take care of the baby results in shitty living conditions and development for said baby. 3. Birth control is not 100% effective no matter what dumb percentage rates you want to pull out of your rectum. 4. Adoption is not an effective alternative unless you actually think it's good for a child to have absolutely no family 5. You need to get over your dumbass feelings and assess situations from an objective point of view instead of screaming bloody murder every time this subject comes up 1. Their own, sure. That right ends once someone else's is involved. 2. Do you also consider those acceptable excuses for neglect or abuse, then? 3. The statement is true but it does not in any way justify abortion. 4. They do have family, just not family that they're blood-related to. Which generally doesn't matter. 5. Projecting much? --- http://www.facebook.com/loaocos/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SAfJB3KYYDg <cite>DarkTransient posted [p:904080641] in With Supre... [t:76755858]...</cite> <quote><cite>Conflict posted...</cite> <quote>Pro-lifers are universally immature and unable to grasp several concepts 1. Women having the right to their own body 2. Most terminated pregnancies are not for "shits and giggles". Health reasons and generally not being able to afford it. Not being able to afford take care of the baby results in shitty living conditions and development for said baby. 3. Birth control is not 100% effective no matter what dumb percentage rates you want to pull out of your rectum. 4. Adoption is not an effective alternative unless you actually think it's good for a child to have absolutely no family 5. You need to get over your dumbass feelings and assess situations from an objective point of view instead of screaming bloody murder every time this subject comes up</quote> 1. Their own, sure. That right ends once someone else's is involved. 2. Do you also consider those acceptable excuses for neglect or abuse, then? 3. The statement is true but it does not in any way justify abortion. 4. They do have family, just not family that they're blood-related to. Which generally doesn't matter. 5. Projecting much?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DarkTransient 06/27/18 5:59:55 PM #204:	KhanJohnny posted... DarkTransient posted... KhanJohnny posted... Yeah evidence that they might have similar brains in some way or another, is very strong evidence that they can feel like the other sex, but to say that it makes them the other sex, presumes that we base our definition of male and female on the basis of what your brain looks like. That has never been the case in Western history, nor do I think that it should logically be the case now. Again, science does not provide the answer for how we define man and woman. Basically, what's going on is that the body's sex, doesn't match the brain's sex. You're ultimately saying "the body is right". But arguably, wouldn't the brain be more critical to determining one's identity than the body? Imo no. Because this is not a question of identity at all. And making it about identity, actually renders the concept of gender incomprehensible, because we no longer have a consistent definition for what a man or woman is, because there are no longer any identifiable traits for what those words mean. Man or woman no longer means person with testes or ovaries, but instead become traitless words. If you were to look into a dictionary written by progressives, the entry for man would read "A person who identifies as a man". But what's wrong with defining it as "someone who has brain structure features including <insert male-specific structures here>"? --- http://www.facebook.com/loaocos/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SAfJB3KYYDg <cite>DarkTransient posted [p:904080697] in With Supre... [t:76755858]...</cite> <quote><cite>KhanJohnny posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KhanJohnny posted...</cite> <quote>Yeah evidence that they might have similar brains in some way or another, is very strong evidence that they can feel like the other sex, but to say that it makes them the other sex, presumes that we base our definition of male and female on the basis of what your brain looks like. That has never been the case in Western history, nor do I think that it should logically be the case now. Again, science does not provide the answer for how we define man and woman.</quote> Basically, what's going on is that the body's sex, doesn't match the brain's sex. You're ultimately saying "the body is right". But arguably, wouldn't the brain be more critical to determining one's identity than the body?</quote> Imo no. Because this is not a question of identity at all. And making it about identity, actually renders the concept of gender incomprehensible, because we no longer have a consistent definition for what a man or woman is, because there are no longer any identifiable traits for what those words mean. Man or woman no longer means person with testes or ovaries, but instead become traitless words. If you were to look into a dictionary written by progressives, the entry for man would read "A person who identifies as a man".</quote> But what's wrong with defining it as "someone who has brain structure features including <insert male-specific structures here>"?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hockeybub89 06/27/18 6:00:47 PM #205:	KhanJohnny posted... DarkTransient posted... KhanJohnny posted... Yeah evidence that they might have similar brains in some way or another, is very strong evidence that they can feel like the other sex, but to say that it makes them the other sex, presumes that we base our definition of male and female on the basis of what your brain looks like. That has never been the case in Western history, nor do I think that it should logically be the case now. Again, science does not provide the answer for how we define man and woman. Basically, what's going on is that the body's sex, doesn't match the brain's sex. You're ultimately saying "the body is right". But arguably, wouldn't the brain be more critical to determining one's identity than the body? Imo no. Because this is not a question of identity at all. And making it about identity, actually renders the concept of gender incomprehensible, because we no longer have a consistent definition for what a man or woman is, because there are no longer any identifiable traits for what those words mean. Man or woman no longer means person with testes or ovaries, but instead become traitless words. If you were to look into a dictionary written by progressives, the entry for man would read "A person who identifies as a man". You said it's a philosophical question, so easy on the "Nothing means anything if it isn't concrete." --- http://card.psnprofiles.com/1/NIR_Hockey.png http://www.last.fm/user/hockeybub89/ <cite>hockeybub89 posted [p:904080751] in With Supre... [t:76755858]...</cite> <quote><cite>KhanJohnny posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KhanJohnny posted...</cite> <quote>Yeah evidence that they might have similar brains in some way or another, is very strong evidence that they can feel like the other sex, but to say that it makes them the other sex, presumes that we base our definition of male and female on the basis of what your brain looks like. That has never been the case in Western history, nor do I think that it should logically be the case now. Again, science does not provide the answer for how we define man and woman.</quote> Basically, what's going on is that the body's sex, doesn't match the brain's sex. You're ultimately saying "the body is right". But arguably, wouldn't the brain be more critical to determining one's identity than the body?</quote> Imo no. Because this is not a question of identity at all. And making it about identity, actually renders the concept of gender incomprehensible, because we no longer have a consistent definition for what a man or woman is, because there are no longer any identifiable traits for what those words mean. Man or woman no longer means person with testes or ovaries, but instead become traitless words. If you were to look into a dictionary written by progressives, the entry for man would read "A person who identifies as a man".</quote> You said it's a philosophical question, so easy on the "Nothing means anything if it isn't concrete."</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mist_Turnips 06/27/18 6:02:35 PM #206:	Ending the right to gay marriage would be stupid. But knocking out abortion sounds hilarious. --- Posted with GameRaven 3.5.1 <cite>Mist_Turnips posted [p:904080872] in With Supre... [t:76755858]...</cite> <quote>Ending the right to gay marriage would be stupid. But knocking out abortion sounds hilarious.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hockeybub89 06/27/18 6:03:12 PM #207:	DarkTransient posted... 1. Their own, sure. That right ends once someone else's is involved Nope. No one ever has a right to anyone else's body. The fetus can develop itself If it doesn't want to be held to the whims of its mother. --- http://card.psnprofiles.com/1/NIR_Hockey.png http://www.last.fm/user/hockeybub89/ <cite>hockeybub89 posted [p:904080923] in With Supre... [t:76755858]...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote>1. Their own, sure. That right ends once someone else's is involved</quote> Nope. No one ever has a right to anyone else's body. The fetus can develop itself If it doesn't want to be held to the whims of its mother.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BWLurker2 06/27/18 6:04:11 PM #208:	Mist_Turnips posted... Ending the right to gay marriage would be stupid. But knocking out abortion sounds hilarious. Why hilarious? Really dumb choice of words. Though I shouldn't expect more from a guy who told Doom_Art he got his cancer from shitposting. <cite>BWLurker2 posted [p:904080979] in With Supre... [t:76755858]...</cite> <quote><cite>Mist_Turnips posted...</cite> <quote>Ending the right to gay marriage would be stupid. But knocking out abortion sounds hilarious.</quote> Why hilarious? Really dumb choice of words. Though I shouldn't expect more from a guy who told Doom_Art he got his cancer from shitposting.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Damn_Underscore 06/27/18 6:05:54 PM #210:	Religious opinion: Abortion should be legal, but it is literally homicide. If you get an abortion you will have to answer for that when you are judged by God. --- Shenmue II = best game of all time Shenmue = 2nd best game of all time <cite>Damn_Underscore posted [p:904081077] in With Supre... [t:76755858]...</cite> <quote>Religious opinion: Abortion should be legal, but it is literally homicide. If you get an abortion you will have to answer for that when you are judged by God.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BWLurker2 06/27/18 6:07:06 PM #211:	Damn_Underscore posted... Religious opinion: Abortion should be legal, but it is literally homicide. If you get an abortion you will have to answer for that when you are judged by God. Separation of church and state. Who cares what God (who may or may not even exist) thinks? <cite>BWLurker2 posted [p:904081152] in With Supre... [t:76755858]...</cite> <quote><cite>Damn_Underscore posted...</cite> <quote>Religious opinion: Abortion should be legal, but it is literally homicide. If you get an abortion you will have to answer for that when you are judged by God.</quote> Separation of church and state. Who cares what God (who may or may not even exist) thinks?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#212	Post #212 was unavailable or deleted.
Abyssea 06/27/18 6:07:22 PM #213:	I do think that transgender stuff needs more research before we can definitively say what is going on with it. I don't see anything wrong with guys being feminine or girls being masculine, but gender reassignment surgery has always seemed such a barbaric way of "fixing" the problem. I think a healthier approach would be to help the person learn to live comfortably in their own body. Because at the end of the day, no amount of surgery and hormones is going to truly change your biological sex. Fighting a war against your own body just sounds so unhealthy. And we don't even know the long term effects of these hormones and surgeries. :/ Like what if your trans vagina just falls off once you're 90+ years old? It all just sounds so risky to me, and this is coming from a gay man. It makes me uncomfortable that people are voluntarily getting a "treatment" that was originally used to try and fix gay men, often by force. But then again, who am I to say what they should do with their bodies? --- https://imgur.com/F2h5rw2 <cite>Abyssea posted [p:904081165] in With Supre... [t:76755858]...</cite> <quote>I do think that transgender stuff needs more research before we can definitively say what is going on with it. I don't see anything wrong with guys being feminine or girls being masculine, but gender reassignment surgery has always seemed such a barbaric way of "fixing" the problem. I think a healthier approach would be to help the person learn to live comfortably in their own body. Because at the end of the day, no amount of surgery and hormones is going to truly change your biological sex. Fighting a war against your own body just sounds so unhealthy. And we don't even know the long term effects of these hormones and surgeries. :/ Like what if your trans vagina just falls off once you're 90+ years old? It all just sounds so risky to me, and this is coming from a gay man. It makes me uncomfortable that people are voluntarily getting a "treatment" that was originally used to try and fix gay men, often by force. But then again, who am I to say what they should do with their bodies?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SnoicFactor 06/27/18 6:08:05 PM #214:	gay rights is a shame. Abortion is fair next. --- nt <cite>SnoicFactor posted [p:904081219] in With Supre... [t:76755858]...</cite> <quote>gay rights is a shame. Abortion is fair next.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Jergensmeat 06/27/18 6:08:18 PM #215:	What about special ed? Or agency for the elderly? Or hiring the age of driving to 21(youth rights)? <cite>Jergensmeat posted [p:904081232] in With Supre... [t:76755858]...</cite> <quote>What about special ed? Or agency for the elderly? Or hiring the age of driving to 21(youth rights)?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KhanJohnny 06/27/18 6:09:32 PM #216:	DarkTransient posted... KhanJohnny posted... DarkTransient posted... KhanJohnny posted... Yeah evidence that they might have similar brains in some way or another, is very strong evidence that they can feel like the other sex, but to say that it makes them the other sex, presumes that we base our definition of male and female on the basis of what your brain looks like. That has never been the case in Western history, nor do I think that it should logically be the case now. Again, science does not provide the answer for how we define man and woman. Basically, what's going on is that the body's sex, doesn't match the brain's sex. You're ultimately saying "the body is right". But arguably, wouldn't the brain be more critical to determining one's identity than the body? Imo no. Because this is not a question of identity at all. And making it about identity, actually renders the concept of gender incomprehensible, because we no longer have a consistent definition for what a man or woman is, because there are no longer any identifiable traits for what those words mean. Man or woman no longer means person with testes or ovaries, but instead become traitless words. If you were to look into a dictionary written by progressives, the entry for man would read "A person who identifies as a man". But what's wrong with defining it as "someone who has brain structure features including <insert male-specific structures here>"? Because having similar brains doesn't mean all that much to me. Lots of people are born with brains that are screwed up in a lot of harmful ways. I wouldn't be surprised if people suffering from body integrity disorder had brains similar to amputees, but that doesn't make them amputees, in my opinion nor justify cutting off limbs. In most cases normally acknolwedge such things as disorders. If we don't do it here, then I don't see what distinguishes this particular form of cognitive dissonance from so many others. A person can strongly, absolutely feel that something is true, and this may even be outside of their control, without rendering it absolutely true. When your "man" brain causes you significant psychological stress, causes you to undergo extensive medical treatments and surgery to reach your desired state, you are probably suffering from a disorder. <cite>KhanJohnny posted [p:904081320] in With Supre... [t:76755858]...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KhanJohnny posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KhanJohnny posted...</cite> <quote>Yeah evidence that they might have similar brains in some way or another, is very strong evidence that they can feel like the other sex, but to say that it makes them the other sex, presumes that we base our definition of male and female on the basis of what your brain looks like. That has never been the case in Western history, nor do I think that it should logically be the case now. Again, science does not provide the answer for how we define man and woman.</quote> Basically, what's going on is that the body's sex, doesn't match the brain's sex. You're ultimately saying "the body is right". But arguably, wouldn't the brain be more critical to determining one's identity than the body?</quote> Imo no. Because this is not a question of identity at all. And making it about identity, actually renders the concept of gender incomprehensible, because we no longer have a consistent definition for what a man or woman is, because there are no longer any identifiable traits for what those words mean. Man or woman no longer means person with testes or ovaries, but instead become traitless words. If you were to look into a dictionary written by progressives, the entry for man would read "A person who identifies as a man".</quote> But what's wrong with defining it as "someone who has brain structure features including <insert male-specific structures here>"?</quote> Because having similar brains doesn't mean all that much to me. Lots of people are born with brains that are screwed up in a lot of harmful ways. I wouldn't be surprised if people suffering from body integrity disorder had brains similar to amputees, but that doesn't make them amputees, in my opinion nor justify cutting off limbs. In most cases normally acknolwedge such things as disorders. If we don't do it here, then I don't see what distinguishes this particular form of cognitive dissonance from so many others. A person can strongly, absolutely feel that something is true, and this may even be outside of their control, without rendering it absolutely true. When your "man" brain causes you significant psychological stress, causes you to undergo extensive medical treatments and surgery to reach your desired state, you are probably suffering from a disorder.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Damn_Underscore 06/27/18 6:13:19 PM #217:	BWLurker2 posted... Damn_Underscore posted... Religious opinion: Abortion should be legal, but it is literally homicide. If you get an abortion you will have to answer for that when you are judged by God. Separation of church and state. Who cares what God (who may or may not even exist) thinks? You should care if God or a god exists and thinks that homicide is wrong. Even if God doesn't exist, it's still about morality and weighing the pros and cons of getting an abortion. Very few people would say that that getting an abortion for fun is morally OK. --- Shenmue II = best game of all time Shenmue = 2nd best game of all time <cite>Damn_Underscore posted [p:904081534] in With Supre... [t:76755858]...</cite> <quote><cite>BWLurker2 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Damn_Underscore posted...</cite> <quote>Religious opinion: Abortion should be legal, but it is literally homicide. If you get an abortion you will have to answer for that when you are judged by God.</quote> Separation of church and state. Who cares what God (who may or may not even exist) thinks?</quote> You should care if God or a god exists and thinks that homicide is wrong. Even if God doesn't exist, it's still about morality and weighing the pros and cons of getting an abortion. Very few people would say that that getting an abortion for fun is morally OK.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheCrimsonAngel 06/27/18 6:14:20 PM #218:	Fuck this stupid country. --- https://imgur.com/Q1nHeDl <cite>TheCrimsonAngel posted [p:904081603] in With Supre... [t:76755858]...</cite> <quote>Fuck this stupid country.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BWLurker2 06/27/18 6:14:39 PM #219:	Damn_Underscore posted... BWLurker2 posted... Damn_Underscore posted... Religious opinion: Abortion should be legal, but it is literally homicide. If you get an abortion you will have to answer for that when you are judged by God. Separation of church and state. Who cares what God (who may or may not even exist) thinks? You should care if God or a god exists and thinks that homicide is wrong. Even if God doesn't exist, it's still about morality and weighing the pros and cons of getting an abortion. Very few people would say that that getting an abortion for fun is morally OK. Now this is a fucking strawman if ever there was one. Find me one person arguing for the right to have abortions for fun <cite>BWLurker2 posted [p:904081621] in With Supre... [t:76755858]...</cite> <quote><cite>Damn_Underscore posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BWLurker2 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Damn_Underscore posted...</cite> <quote>Religious opinion: Abortion should be legal, but it is literally homicide. If you get an abortion you will have to answer for that when you are judged by God.</quote> Separation of church and state. Who cares what God (who may or may not even exist) thinks?</quote> You should care if God or a god exists and thinks that homicide is wrong. Even if God doesn't exist, it's still about morality and weighing the pros and cons of getting an abortion. Very few people would say that that getting an abortion for fun is morally OK.</quote> Now this is a fucking strawman if ever there was one. Find me one person arguing for the right to have abortions for fun</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Damn_Underscore 06/27/18 6:19:22 PM #220:	People get them. They part of abortion being legal. So are abortions that happen because the pregnancy was a mistake and you have no other reason to get one other than the person feels like it. Those are things that you'll have to answer for when you are judged by God. --- Shenmue II = best game of all time Shenmue = 2nd best game of all time <cite>Damn_Underscore posted [p:904081902] in With Supre... [t:76755858]...</cite> <quote>People get them. They part of abortion being legal. So are abortions that happen because the pregnancy was a mistake and you have no other reason to get one other than the person feels like it. Those are things that you'll have to answer for when you are judged by God.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DavidWong 06/27/18 6:20:06 PM #221:	Most people in Australia don't believe in God so we're sweet here --- When goods do not cross borders, soldiers will. Frederic Bastiat, French economist (1801-1850) <cite>DavidWong posted [p:904081947] in With Supre... [t:76755858]...</cite> <quote>Most people in Australia don't believe in God so we're sweet here</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Abyssea 06/27/18 6:20:41 PM #222:	Damn_Underscore posted... People get them. They part of abortion being legal. So are abortions that happen because the pregnancy was a mistake and you have no other reason to get one other than the person feels like it. Those are things that you'll have to answer for when you are judged by God. I doubt God cares that much about dead babies. He killed hundreds of them in the old testament. --- https://imgur.com/F2h5rw2 <cite>Abyssea posted [p:904081986] in With Supre... [t:76755858]...</cite> <quote><cite>Damn_Underscore posted...</cite> <quote>People get them. They part of abortion being legal. So are abortions that happen because the pregnancy was a mistake and you have no other reason to get one other than the person feels like it. Those are things that you'll have to answer for when you are judged by God.</quote> I doubt God cares that much about dead babies. He killed hundreds of them in the old testament.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BWLurker2 06/27/18 6:21:04 PM #223:	Damn_Underscore posted... People get them. They part of abortion being legal. So are abortions that happen because the pregnancy was a mistake and you have no other reason to get one other than the person feels like it. Those are things that you'll have to answer for when you are judged by God. What the fuck? You're making even less sense than usual. A genuine accomplishment. If the pregnancy was a mistake, that's a reason other than "the person feels like it" <cite>BWLurker2 posted [p:904082012] in With Supre... [t:76755858]...</cite> <quote><cite>Damn_Underscore posted...</cite> <quote>People get them. They part of abortion being legal. So are abortions that happen because the pregnancy was a mistake and you have no other reason to get one other than the person feels like it. Those are things that you'll have to answer for when you are judged by God.</quote> What the fuck? You're making even less sense than usual. A genuine accomplishment. If the pregnancy was a mistake, that's a reason other than "the person feels like it"</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
itachi15243 06/27/18 6:25:17 PM #224:	The republicans will now control every branch of our government. We are so fucked as a country. --- I do drawings and stuff https://www.fiverr.com/blueblitz <cite>itachi15243 posted [p:904082262] in With Supre... [t:76755858]...</cite> <quote>The republicans will now control every branch of our government. We are so fucked as a country.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Damn_Underscore 06/27/18 6:25:50 PM #225:	BWLurker2 posted... Damn_Underscore posted... People get them. They part of abortion being legal. So are abortions that happen because the pregnancy was a mistake and you have no other reason to get one other than the person feels like it. Those are things that you'll have to answer for when you are judged by God. If the pregnancy was a mistake, that's a reason other than "the person feels like it" Ok... once again you'll have to answer for that when you are judged by God, but that's not a reason to make abortion illegal. Many people who are pro-life aren't 100% pro-life. There are certain situations, such as the mother's life being at risk, where they believe abortion is justified. --- Shenmue II = best game of all time Shenmue = 2nd best game of all time <cite>Damn_Underscore posted [p:904082297] in With Supre... [t:76755858]...</cite> <quote><cite>BWLurker2 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Damn_Underscore posted...</cite> <quote>People get them. They part of abortion being legal. So are abortions that happen because the pregnancy was a mistake and you have no other reason to get one other than the person feels like it. Those are things that you'll have to answer for when you are judged by God.</quote> If the pregnancy was a mistake, that's a reason other than "the person feels like it"</quote> Ok... once again you'll have to answer for that when you are judged by God, but that's not a reason to make abortion illegal. Many people who are pro-life aren't 100% pro-life. There are certain situations, such as the mother's life being at risk, where they believe abortion is justified.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Cthulhu_Fhtagn 06/27/18 6:27:23 PM #226:	itachi15243 posted... The republicans will now control every branch of our government. We are so fucked as a country. Who exactly is fucked? --- Last night I saw a superhero, he was black He said this is for the street... https://imgtc.com/i/1xVSRqT.png <cite>Cthulhu_Fhtagn posted [p:904082401] in With Supre... [t:76755858]...</cite> <quote><cite>itachi15243 posted...</cite> <quote>The republicans will now control every branch of our government. We are so fucked as a country.</quote> Who exactly is fucked?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Webmaster4531 06/27/18 6:28:14 PM #227:	Damn_Underscore posted... BWLurker2 posted... Damn_Underscore posted... People get them. They part of abortion being legal. So are abortions that happen because the pregnancy was a mistake and you have no other reason to get one other than the person feels like it. Those are things that you'll have to answer for when you are judged by God. If the pregnancy was a mistake, that's a reason other than "the person feels like it" Ok... once again you'll have to answer for that when you are judged by God, but that's not a reason to make abortion illegal. Many people who are pro-life aren't 100% pro-life. There are certain situations, such as the mother's life being at risk, where they believe abortion is justified. How about if a women is desperate enough for a dangerous back alley abortion? --- Ad Hominem. <cite>Webmaster4531 posted [p:904082448] in With Supre... [t:76755858]...</cite> <quote><cite>Damn_Underscore posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BWLurker2 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Damn_Underscore posted...</cite> <quote>People get them. They part of abortion being legal. So are abortions that happen because the pregnancy was a mistake and you have no other reason to get one other than the person feels like it. Those are things that you'll have to answer for when you are judged by God.</quote> If the pregnancy was a mistake, that's a reason other than "the person feels like it"</quote> Ok... once again you'll have to answer for that when you are judged by God, but that's not a reason to make abortion illegal. Many people who are pro-life aren't 100% pro-life. There are certain situations, such as the mother's life being at risk, where they believe abortion is justified.</quote> How about if a women is desperate enough for a dangerous back alley abortion?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheCrimsonAngel 06/27/18 6:29:31 PM #228:	Cthulhu_Fhtagn posted... itachi15243 posted... The republicans will now control every branch of our government. We are so fucked as a country. Who exactly is fucked? Everyone who's not white, male christian and wealthy --- https://imgur.com/Q1nHeDl <cite>TheCrimsonAngel posted [p:904082523] in With Supre... [t:76755858]...</cite> <quote><cite>Cthulhu_Fhtagn posted...</cite> <quote><cite>itachi15243 posted...</cite> <quote>The republicans will now control every branch of our government. We are so fucked as a country.</quote> Who exactly is fucked?</quote> Everyone who's not white, male christian and wealthy</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mist_Turnips 06/27/18 6:30:05 PM #229:	BWLurker2 posted... Mist_Turnips posted... Ending the right to gay marriage would be stupid. But knocking out abortion sounds hilarious. Why hilarious? Really dumb choice of words. Though I shouldn't expect more from a guy who told Doom_Art he got his cancer from shitposting. Keep your meltdown to one topic, mysterybumper. --- Posted with GameRaven 3.5.1 <cite>Mist_Turnips posted [p:904082557] in With Supre... [t:76755858]...</cite> <quote><cite>BWLurker2 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Mist_Turnips posted...</cite> <quote> Ending the right to gay marriage would be stupid. But knocking out abortion sounds hilarious.</quote> Why hilarious? Really dumb choice of words. Though I shouldn't expect more from a guy who told Doom_Art he got his cancer from shitposting.</quote> Keep your meltdown to one topic, mysterybumper.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MrPeppers 06/27/18 6:30:31 PM #230:	shockthemonkey posted... MrPeppers posted... shockthemonkey posted... Cthulhu_Fhtagn posted... Does anyone know the statistics on reasons why women get abortions? I'm legitimately asking. Between rape, just don't want to be an adult, and health reasons. Health issues I definitely get and they're pretty much why I'm in the middle and would vote in favor of abortions if I needed to. Its generally people who didnt want to get pregnant, dont have the means to raise a child, and dont want to or cant physically handle the stress of pregnancy. Medically indicated abortions (High likelihood of maternal mortality or fetal anomaly not compatible with lif) should not be included in your list. Why should a statistically relevant reason why women get abortions not be included on a list of reasons why women get abortions? Because an abortion ban would definitively not include that category of abortion --- https://imgur.com/SGkkbF0 <cite>MrPeppers posted [p:904082585] in With Supre... [t:76755858]...</cite> <quote><cite>shockthemonkey posted...</cite> <quote><cite>MrPeppers posted...</cite> <quote><cite>shockthemonkey posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Cthulhu_Fhtagn posted...</cite> <quote>Does anyone know the statistics on reasons why women get abortions? I'm legitimately asking. Between rape, just don't want to be an adult, and health reasons. Health issues I definitely get and they're pretty much why I'm in the middle and would vote in favor of abortions if I needed to.</quote> Its generally people who didnt want to get pregnant, dont have the means to raise a child, and dont want to or cant physically handle the stress of pregnancy.</quote> Medically indicated abortions (High likelihood of maternal mortality or fetal anomaly not compatible with lif) should not be included in your list.</quote> Why should a statistically relevant reason why women get abortions not be included on a list of reasons why women get abortions?</quote> Because an abortion ban would definitively not include that category of abortion</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BWLurker2 06/27/18 6:31:37 PM #231:	Mist_Turnips posted... BWLurker2 posted... Mist_Turnips posted... Ending the right to gay marriage would be stupid. But knocking out abortion sounds hilarious. Why hilarious? Really dumb choice of words. Though I shouldn't expect more from a guy who told Doom_Art he got his cancer from shitposting. Keep your meltdown to one topic, mysterybumper. You've lost me. Mysterybumper? <cite>BWLurker2 posted [p:904082637] in With Supre... [t:76755858]...</cite> <quote><cite>Mist_Turnips posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BWLurker2 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Mist_Turnips posted...</cite> <quote> Ending the right to gay marriage would be stupid. But knocking out abortion sounds hilarious.</quote> Why hilarious? Really dumb choice of words. Though I shouldn't expect more from a guy who told Doom_Art he got his cancer from shitposting.</quote> Keep your meltdown to one topic, mysterybumper.</quote> You've lost me. Mysterybumper?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Webmaster4531 06/27/18 6:33:02 PM #232:	MrPeppers posted... shockthemonkey posted... MrPeppers posted... shockthemonkey posted... Cthulhu_Fhtagn posted... Does anyone know the statistics on reasons why women get abortions? I'm legitimately asking. Between rape, just don't want to be an adult, and health reasons. Health issues I definitely get and they're pretty much why I'm in the middle and would vote in favor of abortions if I needed to. Its generally people who didnt want to get pregnant, dont have the means to raise a child, and dont want to or cant physically handle the stress of pregnancy. Medically indicated abortions (High likelihood of maternal mortality or fetal anomaly not compatible with lif) should not be included in your list. Why should a statistically relevant reason why women get abortions not be included on a list of reasons why women get abortions? Because an abortion ban would definitively not include that category of abortion It's not definite at all. Entirely possible. --- Ad Hominem. <cite>Webmaster4531 posted [p:904082732] in With Supre... [t:76755858]...</cite> <quote><cite>MrPeppers posted...</cite> <quote><cite>shockthemonkey posted...</cite> <quote><cite>MrPeppers posted...</cite> <quote><cite>shockthemonkey posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Cthulhu_Fhtagn posted...</cite> <quote>Does anyone know the statistics on reasons why women get abortions? I'm legitimately asking. Between rape, just don't want to be an adult, and health reasons. Health issues I definitely get and they're pretty much why I'm in the middle and would vote in favor of abortions if I needed to.</quote> Its generally people who didnt want to get pregnant, dont have the means to raise a child, and dont want to or cant physically handle the stress of pregnancy.</quote> Medically indicated abortions (High likelihood of maternal mortality or fetal anomaly not compatible with lif) should not be included in your list.</quote> Why should a statistically relevant reason why women get abortions not be included on a list of reasons why women get abortions?</quote> Because an abortion ban would definitively not include that category of abortion</quote> It's not definite at all. Entirely possible.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MrPeppers 06/27/18 6:35:03 PM #233:	Webmaster4531 posted... MrPeppers posted... shockthemonkey posted... MrPeppers posted... shockthemonkey posted... Cthulhu_Fhtagn posted... Does anyone know the statistics on reasons why women get abortions? I'm legitimately asking. Between rape, just don't want to be an adult, and health reasons. Health issues I definitely get and they're pretty much why I'm in the middle and would vote in favor of abortions if I needed to. Its generally people who didnt want to get pregnant, dont have the means to raise a child, and dont want to or cant physically handle the stress of pregnancy. Medically indicated abortions (High likelihood of maternal mortality or fetal anomaly not compatible with lif) should not be included in your list. Why should a statistically relevant reason why women get abortions not be included on a list of reasons why women get abortions? Because an abortion ban would definitively not include that category of abortion It's not definite at all. Entirely possible. You do realize that hospitals that do not perform abortions, in even the strictest southern states, perform medically indicated abortions. --- https://imgur.com/SGkkbF0 <cite>MrPeppers posted [p:904082848] in With Supre... [t:76755858]...</cite> <quote><cite>Webmaster4531 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>MrPeppers posted...</cite> <quote><cite>shockthemonkey posted...</cite> <quote><cite>MrPeppers posted...</cite> <quote><cite>shockthemonkey posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Cthulhu_Fhtagn posted...</cite> <quote>Does anyone know the statistics on reasons why women get abortions? I'm legitimately asking. Between rape, just don't want to be an adult, and health reasons. Health issues I definitely get and they're pretty much why I'm in the middle and would vote in favor of abortions if I needed to.</quote> Its generally people who didnt want to get pregnant, dont have the means to raise a child, and dont want to or cant physically handle the stress of pregnancy.</quote> Medically indicated abortions (High likelihood of maternal mortality or fetal anomaly not compatible with lif) should not be included in your list.</quote> Why should a statistically relevant reason why women get abortions not be included on a list of reasons why women get abortions?</quote> Because an abortion ban would definitively not include that category of abortion</quote> It's not definite at all. Entirely possible.</quote> You do realize that hospitals that do not perform abortions, in even the strictest southern states, perform medically indicated abortions.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SuperMariano3 06/27/18 6:35:14 PM #234:	Damn. This is all because Trump won. If Hillary had won it would be 6-3 in favor of liberals. Now it gonna be 6-3 conservatives for several decades. Thanks a lot all those people who stayed home. --- You can take my Karma, but you'll never take......MY FREEDOM! <cite>SuperMariano3 posted [p:904082859] in With Supre... [t:76755858]...</cite> <quote>Damn. This is all because Trump won. If Hillary had won it would be 6-3 in favor of liberals. Now it gonna be 6-3 conservatives for several decades. Thanks a lot all those people who stayed home.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Abyssea 06/27/18 6:36:47 PM #235:	MrPeppers posted... Webmaster4531 posted... MrPeppers posted... shockthemonkey posted... MrPeppers posted... shockthemonkey posted... Cthulhu_Fhtagn posted... Does anyone know the statistics on reasons why women get abortions? I'm legitimately asking. Between rape, just don't want to be an adult, and health reasons. Health issues I definitely get and they're pretty much why I'm in the middle and would vote in favor of abortions if I needed to. Its generally people who didnt want to get pregnant, dont have the means to raise a child, and dont want to or cant physically handle the stress of pregnancy. Medically indicated abortions (High likelihood of maternal mortality or fetal anomaly not compatible with lif) should not be included in your list. Why should a statistically relevant reason why women get abortions not be included on a list of reasons why women get abortions? Because an abortion ban would definitively not include that category of abortion It's not definite at all. Entirely possible. You do realize that hospitals that do not perform abortions, in even the strictest southern states, perform medically indicated abortions. those crazy right to life people don't want abortions to be legal under any circumstance. --- https://imgur.com/F2h5rw2 <cite>Abyssea posted [p:904082948] in With Supre... [t:76755858]...</cite> <quote><cite>MrPeppers posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Webmaster4531 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>MrPeppers posted...</cite> <quote><cite>shockthemonkey posted...</cite> <quote><cite>MrPeppers posted...</cite> <quote><cite>shockthemonkey posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Cthulhu_Fhtagn posted...</cite> <quote>Does anyone know the statistics on reasons why women get abortions? I'm legitimately asking. Between rape, just don't want to be an adult, and health reasons. Health issues I definitely get and they're pretty much why I'm in the middle and would vote in favor of abortions if I needed to.</quote> Its generally people who didnt want to get pregnant, dont have the means to raise a child, and dont want to or cant physically handle the stress of pregnancy.</quote> Medically indicated abortions (High likelihood of maternal mortality or fetal anomaly not compatible with lif) should not be included in your list.</quote> Why should a statistically relevant reason why women get abortions not be included on a list of reasons why women get abortions?</quote> Because an abortion ban would definitively not include that category of abortion</quote> It's not definite at all. Entirely possible.</quote> You do realize that hospitals that do not perform abortions, in even the strictest southern states, perform medically indicated abortions.</quote> those crazy right to life people don't want abortions to be legal under any circumstance.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Webmaster4531 06/27/18 6:37:46 PM #236:	MrPeppers posted... Webmaster4531 posted... MrPeppers posted... shockthemonkey posted... MrPeppers posted... shockthemonkey posted... Cthulhu_Fhtagn posted... Does anyone know the statistics on reasons why women get abortions? I'm legitimately asking. Between rape, just don't want to be an adult, and health reasons. Health issues I definitely get and they're pretty much why I'm in the middle and would vote in favor of abortions if I needed to. Its generally people who didnt want to get pregnant, dont have the means to raise a child, and dont want to or cant physically handle the stress of pregnancy. Medically indicated abortions (High likelihood of maternal mortality or fetal anomaly not compatible with lif) should not be included in your list. Why should a statistically relevant reason why women get abortions not be included on a list of reasons why women get abortions? Because an abortion ban would definitively not include that category of abortion It's not definite at all. Entirely possible. You do realize that hospitals that do not perform abortions, in even the strictest southern states, perform medically indicated abortions. And? They'll stop. --- Ad Hominem. <cite>Webmaster4531 posted [p:904082990] in With Supre... [t:76755858]...</cite> <quote><cite>MrPeppers posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Webmaster4531 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>MrPeppers posted...</cite> <quote><cite>shockthemonkey posted...</cite> <quote><cite>MrPeppers posted...</cite> <quote><cite>shockthemonkey posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Cthulhu_Fhtagn posted...</cite> <quote>Does anyone know the statistics on reasons why women get abortions? I'm legitimately asking. Between rape, just don't want to be an adult, and health reasons. Health issues I definitely get and they're pretty much why I'm in the middle and would vote in favor of abortions if I needed to.</quote> Its generally people who didnt want to get pregnant, dont have the means to raise a child, and dont want to or cant physically handle the stress of pregnancy.</quote> Medically indicated abortions (High likelihood of maternal mortality or fetal anomaly not compatible with lif) should not be included in your list.</quote> Why should a statistically relevant reason why women get abortions not be included on a list of reasons why women get abortions?</quote> Because an abortion ban would definitively not include that category of abortion</quote> It's not definite at all. Entirely possible.</quote> You do realize that hospitals that do not perform abortions, in even the strictest southern states, perform medically indicated abortions.</quote> And? They'll stop.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DevsBro 06/27/18 6:38:39 PM #237:	BWLurker2 posted... PiOverlord posted... I'll cheer and throw a party when Roe v. Wade is eliminated. It'll just mean more women dead from botched back alley abortions Why hello again teleological ethics, it's been AGES since I wisened up and left you. --- http://backloggery.com/devsbro/sig.gif https://imgur.com/kU5vu5N Never pepper popcorn <cite>DevsBro posted [p:904083043] in With Supre... [t:76755858]...</cite> <quote><cite>BWLurker2 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>PiOverlord posted...</cite> <quote>I'll cheer and throw a party when Roe v. Wade is eliminated.</quote> It'll just mean more women dead from botched back alley abortions</quote> Why hello again teleological ethics, it's been AGES since I wisened up and left you.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Funbazooka 06/27/18 6:39:13 PM #238:	Cthulhu_Fhtagn posted... itachi15243 posted... The republicans will now control every branch of our government. We are so fucked as a country. Who exactly is fucked? Left-wing believes America is ruled over by the reincarnation of Hitler, for all intents and purposes. Their sense of reality is that warped. --- "Don't trade your authenticity for approval." -Kanye West <cite>Funbazooka posted [p:904083074] in With Supre... [t:76755858]...</cite> <quote><cite>Cthulhu_Fhtagn posted...</cite> <quote><cite>itachi15243 posted...</cite> <quote>The republicans will now control every branch of our government. We are so fucked as a country.</quote> Who exactly is fucked?</quote> Left-wing believes America is ruled over by the reincarnation of Hitler, for all intents and purposes. Their sense of reality is that warped.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MrPeppers 06/27/18 6:40:19 PM #239:	Abyssea posted... those crazy right to life people don't want abortions to be legal under any circumstance. I dont doubt that. And I dont doubt that people will try to push for more restrictive abortion laws, especially for elective ones. Even with a predominantly right-wing Supreme Court, a complete 100% abortion ban for all abortions blanket statement is pure fearmongering. Literally people would not be allowed to have life saving emergency surgeries for ectopic pregnancies if this were the case. --- https://imgur.com/SGkkbF0 <cite>MrPeppers posted [p:904083137] in With Supre... [t:76755858]...</cite> <quote><cite>Abyssea posted...</cite> <quote> those crazy right to life people don't want abortions to be legal under any circumstance.</quote> I dont doubt that. And I dont doubt that people will try to push for more restrictive abortion laws, especially for elective ones. Even with a predominantly right-wing Supreme Court, a complete 100% abortion ban for all abortions blanket statement is pure fearmongering. Literally people would not be allowed to have life saving emergency surgeries for ectopic pregnancies if this were the case.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DarkTransient 06/27/18 6:42:47 PM #240:	SuperMariano3 posted... Damn. This is all because Trump won. If Hillary had won it would be 6-3 in favor of liberals. Now it gonna be 6-3 conservatives for several decades. Thanks a lot all those people who stayed home. To be fair, this is a symptom of the weird way US politics works. If you're going to have a system where it's decided by (with some proportional adjustments) how each state voted, rather than the overall national vote, you're going to get a lot of people who think their state is solidly going one way or the other not bothering to vote. I would not agree with retroactively applying "popular vote decides" in any case, because how the candidates would need to campaign will be different under such a system. Even just applying it to future cases, indeed, gives undue power to particularly large states. But perhaps ditching the "winner takes all" and instead each state distributing its EC votes based on the proportions of popular vote within the state... --- http://www.facebook.com/loaocos/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SAfJB3KYYDg <cite>DarkTransient posted [p:904083285] in With Supre... [t:76755858]...</cite> <quote><cite>SuperMariano3 posted...</cite> <quote>Damn. This is all because Trump won. If Hillary had won it would be 6-3 in favor of liberals. Now it gonna be 6-3 conservatives for several decades. Thanks a lot all those people who stayed home.</quote> To be fair, this is a symptom of the weird way US politics works. If you're going to have a system where it's decided by (with some proportional adjustments) how each state voted, rather than the overall national vote, you're going to get a lot of people who think their state is solidly going one way or the other not bothering to vote. I would not agree with retroactively applying "popular vote decides" in any case, because how the candidates would need to campaign will be different under such a system. Even just applying it to future cases, indeed, gives undue power to particularly large states. But perhaps ditching the "winner takes all" and instead each state distributing its EC votes based on the proportions of popular vote within the state...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BWLurker2 06/27/18 6:44:21 PM #241:	DevsBro posted... BWLurker2 posted... PiOverlord posted... I'll cheer and throw a party when Roe v. Wade is eliminated. It'll just mean more women dead from botched back alley abortions Why hello again teleological ethics, it's been AGES since I wisened up and left you. You're using that wrong. I'm not using ends to justify means. I'm just pointing out what will logically follow. I justify abortions by believing it's a woman's right to decide if she wants to carry to term. <cite>BWLurker2 posted [p:904083372] in With Supre... [t:76755858]...</cite> <quote><cite>DevsBro posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BWLurker2 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>PiOverlord posted...</cite> <quote>I'll cheer and throw a party when Roe v. Wade is eliminated.</quote> It'll just mean more women dead from botched back alley abortions</quote> Why hello again teleological ethics, it's been AGES since I wisened up and left you.</quote> You're using that wrong. I'm not using ends to justify means. I'm just pointing out what will logically follow. I justify abortions by believing it's a woman's right to decide if she wants to carry to term.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Prestoff 06/27/18 6:46:28 PM #242:	It would be political suicide to make gay marriage illegal, but i can Iefinitely see Roe vs Wade being undone, considering what administration we're in. --- It's what all true warriors strive for! <cite>Prestoff posted [p:904083492] in With Supre... [t:76755858]...</cite> <quote>It would be political suicide to make gay marriage illegal, but i can Iefinitely see Roe vs Wade being undone, considering what administration we're in.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ThePieReborn 06/27/18 6:48:47 PM #243:	Would seem to me to be an odd walking back of the privacy liberty interest insofar as bodily integrity goes, as well as being at odds with the common law regarding personhood. --- Party leader, passive-aggressive doormat, pasta eater extraordinaire! <cite>ThePieReborn posted [p:904083630] in With Supre... [t:76755858]...</cite> <quote>Would seem to me to be an odd walking back of the privacy liberty interest insofar as bodily integrity goes, as well as being at odds with the common law regarding personhood.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheCrimsonAngel 06/27/18 6:49:37 PM #244:	Prestoff posted... It would be political suicide to make gay marriage illegal Why do people say this? This administration continuously does things that should be political suicide and nothing happens. If we've learned nothing it's that Trump can say or do whatever he wants up to and including insult POWs and his followers don't give a shit. --- https://imgur.com/Q1nHeDl <cite>TheCrimsonAngel posted [p:904083682] in With Supre... [t:76755858]...</cite> <quote><cite>Prestoff posted...</cite> <quote>It would be political suicide to make gay marriage illegal</quote> Why do people say this? This administration continuously does things that should be political suicide and nothing happens. If we've learned nothing it's that Trump can say or do whatever he wants up to and including insult POWs and his followers don't give a shit.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DevsBro 06/27/18 6:50:01 PM #245:	BWLurker2 posted... DevsBro posted... BWLurker2 posted... PiOverlord posted... I'll cheer and throw a party when Roe v. Wade is eliminated. It'll just mean more women dead from botched back alley abortions Why hello again teleological ethics, it's been AGES since I wisened up and left you. You're using that wrong. I'm not using ends to justify means. I'm just pointing out what will logically follow. I justify abortions by believing it's a woman's right to decide if she wants to carry to term. No I'm using it correctly. Teleological ethics is the broad umbrella over beliefs that the driving force of right and wrong is the result. The "ends justify the means" philosophy is more specific. --- http://backloggery.com/devsbro/sig.gif https://imgur.com/kU5vu5N Never pepper popcorn <cite>DevsBro posted [p:904083715] in With Supre... [t:76755858]...</cite> <quote><cite>BWLurker2 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DevsBro posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BWLurker2 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>PiOverlord posted...</cite> <quote>I'll cheer and throw a party when Roe v. Wade is eliminated.</quote> It'll just mean more women dead from botched back alley abortions</quote> Why hello again teleological ethics, it's been AGES since I wisened up and left you.</quote> You're using that wrong. I'm not using ends to justify means. I'm just pointing out what will logically follow. I justify abortions by believing it's a woman's right to decide if she wants to carry to term.</quote> No I'm using it correctly. Teleological ethics is the broad umbrella over beliefs that the driving force of right and wrong is the result. The "ends justify the means" philosophy is more specific.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Abyssea 06/27/18 6:52:17 PM #246:	TheCrimsonAngel posted... Prestoff posted... It would be political suicide to make gay marriage illegal Why do people say this? This administration continuously does things that should be political suicide and nothing happens. If we've learned nothing it's that Trump can say or do whatever he wants up to and including insult POWs and his followers don't give a shit. legislatively, they haven't done anything all that bad besides try to cripple the ACA. I think a lot of people have just stopped taking Trump's ridiculous commentary on things seriously. --- https://imgur.com/F2h5rw2 <cite>Abyssea posted [p:904083856] in With Supre... [t:76755858]...</cite> <quote><cite>TheCrimsonAngel posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Prestoff posted...</cite> <quote>It would be political suicide to make gay marriage illegal</quote> Why do people say this? This administration continuously does things that should be political suicide and nothing happens. If we've learned nothing it's that Trump can say or do whatever he wants up to and including insult POWs and his followers don't give a shit.</quote> legislatively, they haven't done anything all that bad besides try to cripple the ACA. I think a lot of people have just stopped taking Trump's ridiculous commentary on things seriously.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BWLurker2 06/27/18 6:54:45 PM #247:	DevsBro posted... BWLurker2 posted... DevsBro posted... BWLurker2 posted... PiOverlord posted... I'll cheer and throw a party when Roe v. Wade is eliminated. It'll just mean more women dead from botched back alley abortions Why hello again teleological ethics, it's been AGES since I wisened up and left you. You're using that wrong. I'm not using ends to justify means. I'm just pointing out what will logically follow. I justify abortions by believing it's a woman's right to decide if she wants to carry to term. No I'm using it correctly. Teleological ethics is the broad umbrella over beliefs that the driving force of right and wrong is the result. The "ends justify the means" philosophy is more specific. And I'm telling you that I'm not basing my beliefs on "women will do it anyway and get hurt" that's just an effect that will happen. <cite>BWLurker2 posted [p:904084024] in With Supre... [t:76755858]...</cite> <quote><cite>DevsBro posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BWLurker2 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DevsBro posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BWLurker2 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>PiOverlord posted...</cite> <quote>I'll cheer and throw a party when Roe v. Wade is eliminated.</quote> It'll just mean more women dead from botched back alley abortions</quote> Why hello again teleological ethics, it's been AGES since I wisened up and left you.</quote> You're using that wrong. I'm not using ends to justify means. I'm just pointing out what will logically follow. I justify abortions by believing it's a woman's right to decide if she wants to carry to term.</quote> No I'm using it correctly. Teleological ethics is the broad umbrella over beliefs that the driving force of right and wrong is the result. The "ends justify the means" philosophy is more specific.</quote> And I'm telling you that I'm not basing my beliefs on "women will do it anyway and get hurt" that's just an effect that will happen.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BLAKUboy 06/27/18 6:57:40 PM #248:	TheCrimsonAngel posted... Why do people say this? This administration continuously does things that should be political suicide and nothing happens. If we've learned nothing it's that Trump can say or do whatever he wants up to and including insult POWs and his followers don't give a shit. Nothing ever seems to hit Trump (yet) sure, but other people in his orbit have not been nearly so lucky. And here, you'll note, we're talking about Supreme Court Justices. Not Trump. --- Aeris dies if she takes more damage than her current HP - Panthera https://signavatar.com/26999_s.png <cite>BLAKUboy posted [p:904084217] in With Supre... [t:76755858]...</cite> <quote><cite>TheCrimsonAngel posted...</cite> <quote>Why do people say this? This administration continuously does things that should be political suicide and nothing happens. If we've learned nothing it's that Trump can say or do whatever he wants up to and including insult POWs and his followers don't give a shit.</quote> Nothing ever seems to hit Trump (yet) sure, but other people in his orbit have not been nearly so lucky. And here, you'll note, we're talking about Supreme Court Justices. Not Trump.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DevsBro 06/27/18 6:59:55 PM #249:	BWLurker2 posted... DevsBro posted... BWLurker2 posted... DevsBro posted... BWLurker2 posted... PiOverlord posted... I'll cheer and throw a party when Roe v. Wade is eliminated. It'll just mean more women dead from botched back alley abortions Why hello again teleological ethics, it's been AGES since I wisened up and left you. You're using that wrong. I'm not using ends to justify means. I'm just pointing out what will logically follow. I justify abortions by believing it's a woman's right to decide if she wants to carry to term. No I'm using it correctly. Teleological ethics is the broad umbrella over beliefs that the driving force of right and wrong is the result. The "ends justify the means" philosophy is more specific. And I'm telling you that I'm not basing my beliefs on "women will do it anyway and get hurt" that's just an effect that will happen. I see. My mistake. --- http://backloggery.com/devsbro/sig.gif https://imgur.com/kU5vu5N Never pepper popcorn <cite>DevsBro posted [p:904084329] in With Supre... [t:76755858]...</cite> <quote><cite>BWLurker2 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DevsBro posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BWLurker2 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DevsBro posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BWLurker2 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>PiOverlord posted...</cite> <quote>I'll cheer and throw a party when Roe v. Wade is eliminated.</quote> It'll just mean more women dead from botched back alley abortions</quote> Why hello again teleological ethics, it's been AGES since I wisened up and left you.</quote> You're using that wrong. I'm not using ends to justify means. I'm just pointing out what will logically follow. I justify abortions by believing it's a woman's right to decide if she wants to carry to term.</quote> No I'm using it correctly. Teleological ethics is the broad umbrella over beliefs that the driving force of right and wrong is the result. The "ends justify the means" philosophy is more specific.</quote> And I'm telling you that I'm not basing my beliefs on "women will do it anyway and get hurt" that's just an effect that will happen.</quote> I see. My mistake.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SodomInsane 06/27/18 7:09:11 PM #250:	Feel bad for Merrick Garland. He might never get nominated again. --- https://imgur.com/GZUKvFD <cite>SodomInsane posted [p:904084854] in With Supre... [t:76755858]...</cite> <quote>Feel bad for Merrick Garland. He might never get nominated again.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
UnholyMudcrab 06/27/18 7:10:09 PM #251:	SodomInsane posted... Feel bad for Merrick Garland. He might never get nominated again. McConnell should be in prison for what he did --- https://imgur.com/VeNBg https://imgur.com/gd5jC8q https://imgur.com/PKIy7 https://imgur.com/3p29JqP <cite>UnholyMudcrab posted [p:904084911] in With Supre... [t:76755858]...</cite> <quote><cite>SodomInsane posted...</cite> <quote>Feel bad for Merrick Garland. He might never get nominated again.</quote> McConnell should be in prison for what he did</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tropicalwood 06/27/18 7:11:18 PM #252:	SodomInsane posted... Feel bad for Merrick Garland. He might never get nominated again. Not as bad as millions of Americans would be when he overturned the results of Heller. --- ayy lmao ayy lmao \|\| oaml oaml yya yya ayy lmao ayy lmao \|\| oaml oaml yya yya <cite>Tropicalwood posted [p:904084976] in With Supre... [t:76755858]...</cite> <quote><cite>SodomInsane posted...</cite> <quote>Feel bad for Merrick Garland. He might never get nominated again.</quote> Not as bad as millions of Americans would be when he overturned the results of Heller.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7

Current Events > With Supreme Court Justice Kennedy Gone, Abortion and Gay Rights Are Next (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > With Supreme Court Justice Kennedy Gone, Abortion and Gay Rights Are Next