Current Events > So studies show Trump won the popular vote too

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2
BillyKidd 06/21/17 1:16:00 PM #1:	http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jun/19/noncitizen-illegal-vote-number-higher-than-estimat/ Apparently, Trump underestimated how many illegals voted. When is this guy going to stop winning? --- Tho I walk through the valley of death, I shall fear no evil. For I'm the meanest mofo in the whole f'n valley http://i.imgur.com/4GzX1.jpg <cite>BillyKidd posted [p:881541809] in So studies... [t:75486339]...</cite> <quote>http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jun/19/noncitizen-illegal-vote-number-higher-than-estimat/ Apparently, Trump underestimated how many illegals voted. When is this guy going to stop winning?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
mario2000 06/21/17 1:17:20 PM #2:	i thought washington times was librul faek nooz --- Arrrr the SS Goku, Mighty fine boat... -fatmatt Hope Frieza doesn't chuck an Iceberg at the Goku, otherwise it's all over. -Nekoslash <cite>mario2000 posted [p:881541886] in So studies... [t:75486339]...</cite> <quote>i thought washington times was librul faek nooz</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BillyKidd 06/21/17 1:19:15 PM #3:	That's how bad it got caught. When even liberal news organizations have to admit it. --- Tho I walk through the valley of death, I shall fear no evil. For I'm the meanest mofo in the whole f'n valley http://i.imgur.com/4GzX1.jpg <cite>BillyKidd posted [p:881542003] in So studies... [t:75486339]...</cite> <quote>That's how bad it got caught. When even liberal news organizations have to admit it.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
foreveraIone 06/21/17 1:20:04 PM #4:	Man. Thank Jeff Bezos for turning this failing newspaper aroun-hey wait a minute. --- http://i.imgtc.com/qieELu9.jpg Always. Edgy. <cite>foreveraIone posted [p:881542043] in So studies... [t:75486339]...</cite> <quote>Man. Thank Jeff Bezos for turning this failing newspaper aroun-hey wait a minute.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Giant_Aspirin 06/21/17 1:20:09 PM #5:	The research organization Just Facts, a widely cited, independent think tank led by self-described conservatives and libertarians, only red hatters would believe these guys over Harvard University. --- Now Playing: Persona 5 (PS4), The Old Blood (PC) *(~);} - Get out the pans, don't just stand there dreamin' - {;(~)* <cite>Giant_Aspirin posted [p:881542046] in So studies... [t:75486339]...</cite> <quote>The research organization Just Facts, a widely cited, independent think tank led by self-described conservatives and libertarians, only red hatters would believe these guys over Harvard University.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
mario2000 06/21/17 1:23:01 PM #6:	BillyKidd posted... That's how bad it got caught. When even liberal news organizations have to admit it. ah those redhat mental gymnastics at work david koresh wished he had cult followers as blindly faithful as trumpists --- Arrrr the SS Goku, Mighty fine boat... -fatmatt Hope Frieza doesn't chuck an Iceberg at the Goku, otherwise it's all over. -Nekoslash <cite>mario2000 posted [p:881542227] in So studies... [t:75486339]...</cite> <quote><cite>BillyKidd posted...</cite> <quote>That's how bad it got caught. When even liberal news organizations have to admit it.</quote> ah those redhat mental gymnastics at work david koresh wished he had cult followers as blindly faithful as trumpists</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BillyKidd 06/21/17 1:24:36 PM #7:	mario2000 posted... BillyKidd posted... That's how bad it got caught. When even liberal news organizations have to admit it. ah those redhat mental gymnastics at work david koresh wished he had cult followers as blindly faithful as trumpists how you figure? Washington Times was calling it a conspiracy theory 5 months ago. --- Tho I walk through the valley of death, I shall fear no evil. For I'm the meanest mofo in the whole f'n valley http://i.imgur.com/4GzX1.jpg <cite>BillyKidd posted [p:881542316] in So studies... [t:75486339]...</cite> <quote><cite>mario2000 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BillyKidd posted...</cite> <quote>That's how bad it got caught. When even liberal news organizations have to admit it.</quote> ah those redhat mental gymnastics at work david koresh wished he had cult followers as blindly faithful as trumpists</quote> how you figure? Washington Times was calling it a conspiracy theory 5 months ago.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Amputee 06/21/17 1:27:27 PM #8:	BillyKidd posted... http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jun/19/noncitizen-illegal-vote-number-higher-than-estimat/ Apparently, Trump underestimated how many illegals voted. When is this guy going to stop winning? This is 100% false. Breaking news: a conservative leaning think-tank says something without presenting facts BTW the Washington Times is conservative, in post 3 you refer to them as "liberal". Ignorance is unbecoming. --- I've been amputated! <cite>Amputee posted [p:881542501] in So studies... [t:75486339]...</cite> <quote><cite>BillyKidd posted...</cite> <quote>http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jun/19/noncitizen-illegal-vote-number-higher-than-estimat/ Apparently, Trump underestimated how many illegals voted. When is this guy going to stop winning?</quote> This is 100% false. Breaking news: a conservative leaning think-tank says something without presenting facts BTW the Washington Times is conservative, in post 3 you refer to them as "liberal". Ignorance is unbecoming.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Amputee 06/21/17 1:28:52 PM #9:	BillyKidd posted... mario2000 posted... BillyKidd posted... That's how bad it got caught. When even liberal news organizations have to admit it. ah those redhat mental gymnastics at work david koresh wished he had cult followers as blindly faithful as trumpists how you figure? Washington Times was calling it a conspiracy theory 5 months ago. Lol, the low-info voter doesn't know the difference between the Washington Post and the Washington Times --- I've been amputated! <cite>Amputee posted [p:881542584] in So studies... [t:75486339]...</cite> <quote><cite>BillyKidd posted...</cite> <quote><cite>mario2000 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BillyKidd posted...</cite> <quote>That's how bad it got caught. When even liberal news organizations have to admit it.</quote> ah those redhat mental gymnastics at work david koresh wished he had cult followers as blindly faithful as trumpists</quote> how you figure? Washington Times was calling it a conspiracy theory 5 months ago.</quote> Lol, the low-info voter doesn't know the difference between the Washington Post and the Washington Times</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
billcom6 06/21/17 1:29:44 PM #10:	1. No he didn't. 2. If non citizens cast votes, we are just going to assume THEY ALL voted for Hillary? I mean I know that is what is best for Trump's fragile ego to make him think he didn't lose the popular vote, but c'mon. --- Because most days are bad days... --- Steam and XBOX Live: billcom6 My Teams: The Ohio State Buckeyes, New York Yankees, Buffalo Bills, The CBJ, Cavs <cite>billcom6 posted [p:881542635] in So studies... [t:75486339]...</cite> <quote>1. No he didn't. 2. If non citizens cast votes, we are just going to assume THEY ALL voted for Hillary? I mean I know that is what is best for Trump's fragile ego to make him think he didn't lose the popular vote, but c'mon.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CruelBuffalo 06/21/17 1:31:22 PM #11:	https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Washington_Times Seems conservative to me lol <cite>CruelBuffalo posted [p:881542726] in So studies... [t:75486339]...</cite> <quote>https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Washington_Times Seems conservative to me lol</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Capn Circus 06/21/17 1:33:21 PM #12:	And this is precisely the reason democrat cities knowingly and enthusiastically harbor known illegal immigrants--even violent criminal illegal aliens. Trump exposed them. Flushed 'em out in the open --- "I think that man will be president right about the time when spaceships come down filled with dinosaurs in red capes" - Tom Hanks <cite>Capn Circus posted [p:881542824] in So studies... [t:75486339]...</cite> <quote>And this is precisely the reason democrat cities knowingly and enthusiastically harbor known illegal immigrants--even violent criminal illegal aliens. Trump exposed them. Flushed 'em out in the open</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#13	Post #13 was unavailable or deleted.
Amputee 06/21/17 1:34:15 PM #14:	billcom6 posted... 1. No he didn't. 2. If non citizens cast votes, we are just going to assume THEY ALL voted for Hillary? I mean I know that is what is best for Trump's fragile ego to make him think he didn't lose the popular vote, but c'mon. Non-citizens do not vote. It's the same reason the commit crimes at a much lower rate than actual citizens - keep your nose clean and keep a low profile. This is a POS fake story from a highly questionable person, that is why literally nobody is covering it, even fox won't fuck with it from what I see. --- I've been amputated! <cite>Amputee posted [p:881542865] in So studies... [t:75486339]...</cite> <quote><cite>billcom6 posted...</cite> <quote>1. No he didn't. 2. If non citizens cast votes, we are just going to assume THEY ALL voted for Hillary? I mean I know that is what is best for Trump's fragile ego to make him think he didn't lose the popular vote, but c'mon.</quote> Non-citizens do not vote. It's the same reason the commit crimes at a much lower rate than actual citizens - keep your nose clean and keep a low profile. This is a POS fake story from a highly questionable person, that is why literally nobody is covering it, even fox won't fuck with it from what I see.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
RebelElite791 06/21/17 1:35:14 PM #15:	Honestly cant tell if this topic is satire or not --- http://i.imgur.com/MS5SvzN.gif https://i.imgur.com/ahQpG57.jpg <cite>RebelElite791 posted [p:881542925] in So studies... [t:75486339]...</cite> <quote>Honestly cant tell if this topic is satire or not</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kim Kusanagi 06/21/17 1:36:00 PM #16:	Giant_Aspirin posted... The research organization Just Facts, a widely cited, independent think tank led by self-described conservatives and libertarians, --- Live to train. Train to fight. Fight to live. When you retire, think only on fighting. Take me away, I don't mind, but you better promise I'll be back in time! <cite>Kim Kusanagi posted [p:881542964] in So studies... [t:75486339]...</cite> <quote><cite>Giant_Aspirin posted...</cite> <quote>The research organization Just Facts, a widely cited, independent think tank led by self-described conservatives and libertarians, </quote> </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
gmims44 06/21/17 1:36:26 PM #17:	Go easy on them, guys. Their Dear Leader asked them to believe something blatantly untrue, and it's not always easy to comply. They're doing the best they can. Here's a tip: just repeat the lie over and over again to yourselves, and eventually it will feel true. <cite>gmims44 posted [p:881542994] in So studies... [t:75486339]...</cite> <quote>Go easy on them, guys. Their Dear Leader asked them to believe something blatantly untrue, and it's not always easy to comply. They're doing the best they can. Here's a tip: just repeat the lie over and over again to yourselves, and eventually it will feel true.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tmaster148 06/21/17 1:37:17 PM #18:	RebelElite791 posted... Honestly cant tell if this topic is satire or not I don't think it is. I think TC legitimately believes millions of illegals voted in the election without any hard evidence to back the claim. --- http://i.imgur.com/BBcZDLJ.png <cite>Tmaster148 posted [p:881543054] in So studies... [t:75486339]...</cite> <quote><cite>RebelElite791 posted...</cite> <quote>Honestly cant tell if this topic is satire or not</quote> I don't think it is. I think TC legitimately believes millions of illegals voted in the election without any hard evidence to back the claim.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hyperpowder 06/21/17 1:37:44 PM #19:	He probably did win the popular vote. Now how does that make him less awful as a president? --- Whoever beats my score I will give them a $10 PSN or Live card: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RpiorAx40GY <cite>hyperpowder posted [p:881543082] in So studies... [t:75486339]...</cite> <quote>He probably did win the popular vote. Now how does that make him less awful as a president?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BillyKidd 06/21/17 1:39:51 PM #20:	billcom6 posted... 1. No he didn't. 2. If non citizens cast votes, we are just going to assume THEY ALL voted for Hillary? I mean I know that is what is best for Trump's fragile ego to make him think he didn't lose the popular vote, but c'mon. 1) Yes he did. He said it was like 3 million, not almost 6. 2) You really think they are going to vote for the guy that said multiple times he's going to fly them back to their country of origin? --- Tho I walk through the valley of death, I shall fear no evil. For I'm the meanest mofo in the whole f'n valley http://i.imgur.com/4GzX1.jpg <cite>BillyKidd posted [p:881543223] in So studies... [t:75486339]...</cite> <quote><cite>billcom6 posted...</cite> <quote>1. No he didn't. 2. If non citizens cast votes, we are just going to assume THEY ALL voted for Hillary? I mean I know that is what is best for Trump's fragile ego to make him think he didn't lose the popular vote, but c'mon.</quote> 1) Yes he did. He said it was like 3 million, not almost 6. 2) You really think they are going to vote for the guy that said multiple times he's going to fly them back to their country of origin?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Xxlv20xX 06/21/17 1:39:56 PM #21:	Am I missing something or does this story only mention studies that dealt with the 2008 and 2012 elections? <cite>Xxlv20xX posted [p:881543228] in So studies... [t:75486339]...</cite> <quote>Am I missing something or does this story only mention studies that dealt with the 2008 and 2012 elections?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
FighterStreet 06/21/17 1:40:48 PM #22:	why does it matter if he won? Why does the TC care? <cite>FighterStreet posted [p:881543294] in So studies... [t:75486339]...</cite> <quote>why does it matter if he won? Why does the TC care?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BillyKidd 06/21/17 1:41:20 PM #23:	Kim Kusanagi posted... Giant_Aspirin posted... The research organization Just Facts, a widely cited, independent think tank led by self-described conservatives and libertarians, not an argument --- Tho I walk through the valley of death, I shall fear no evil. For I'm the meanest mofo in the whole f'n valley http://i.imgur.com/4GzX1.jpg <cite>BillyKidd posted [p:881543317] in So studies... [t:75486339]...</cite> <quote><cite>Kim Kusanagi posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Giant_Aspirin posted...</cite> <quote>The research organization Just Facts, a widely cited, independent think tank led by self-described conservatives and libertarians, </quote> </quote> not an argument</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#24	Post #24 was unavailable or deleted.
Tmaster148 06/21/17 1:42:53 PM #25:	Xxlv20xX posted... Am I missing something or does this story only mention studies that dealt with the 2008 and 2012 elections? The entire study is based on there's millions of illegals registered to vote, therefore they must have voted. --- http://i.imgur.com/BBcZDLJ.png <cite>Tmaster148 posted [p:881543429] in So studies... [t:75486339]...</cite> <quote><cite>Xxlv20xX posted...</cite> <quote>Am I missing something or does this story only mention studies that dealt with the 2008 and 2012 elections?</quote> The entire study is based on there's millions of illegals registered to vote, therefore they must have voted.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Balrog0 06/21/17 1:43:37 PM #26:	the washington times is a conservative outlet btw --- He would make his mark, if not on this tree, then on that wall; if not with teeth and claws, then with penknife and razor. <cite>Balrog0 posted [p:881543479] in So studies... [t:75486339]...</cite> <quote>the washington times is a conservative outlet btw</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CableZL 06/21/17 1:46:29 PM #27:	He estimated that as many as 7.9 million noncitizens were illegally registered that year and 594,000 to 5.7 million voted. I see. When you don't have actual facts, just present a wide ass range in your estimate just to cover your bases. --- http://i.imgur.com/ByKGlJb.gif http://i.imgur.com/nZdaA8D.gif http://i.imgur.com/VBLBILg.jpg <cite>CableZL posted [p:881543675] in So studies... [t:75486339]...</cite> <quote>He estimated that as many as 7.9 million noncitizens were illegally registered that year and 594,000 to 5.7 million voted. I see. When you don't have actual facts, just present a wide ass range in your estimate just to cover your bases.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kim Kusanagi 06/21/17 1:50:34 PM #28:	BillyKidd posted... Kim Kusanagi posted... Giant_Aspirin posted... The research organization Just Facts, a widely cited, independent think tank led by self-described conservatives and libertarians, not an argument A nonargument for a nonargument --- Live to train. Train to fight. Fight to live. When you retire, think only on fighting. Take me away, I don't mind, but you better promise I'll be back in time! <cite>Kim Kusanagi posted [p:881543934] in So studies... [t:75486339]...</cite> <quote><cite>BillyKidd posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Kim Kusanagi posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Giant_Aspirin posted...</cite> <quote>The research organization Just Facts, a widely cited, independent think tank led by self-described conservatives and libertarians, </quote> </quote> not an argument</quote> A nonargument for a nonargument</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
The Deadpool 06/21/17 1:52:45 PM #29:	594,000 to 5.7 million voted. That's some margin of error... --- We are living in a world today where lemonade is made from artificial flavors and furniture polish is made from real lemons. <cite>The Deadpool posted [p:881544077] in So studies... [t:75486339]...</cite> <quote><quote>594,000 to 5.7 million voted.</quote> That's some margin of error...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
gmims44 06/21/17 1:54:52 PM #30:	posts complete bulls** pulled out of someone's ass "Where's your counterargument, liberals?" <cite>gmims44 posted [p:881544232] in So studies... [t:75486339]...</cite> <quote>posts complete bulls** pulled out of someone's ass "Where's your counterargument, liberals?"</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Amputee 06/21/17 1:56:09 PM #31:	I think it is safe to say that TC got sufficiently roasted for sharing fake news, therefore ghosted away. --- I've been amputated! <cite>Amputee posted [p:881544300] in So studies... [t:75486339]...</cite> <quote>I think it is safe to say that TC got sufficiently roasted for sharing fake news, therefore ghosted away.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
COVxy 06/21/17 1:56:48 PM #32:	The Deadpool posted... That's some margin of error... JUST FACTS! (this seems like the name someone would give a think tank if they were someone who debates about gender by citing chromosomes, or only talks about obesity in reference to CICO) --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] <cite>COVxy posted [p:881544348] in So studies... [t:75486339]...</cite> <quote><cite>The Deadpool posted...</cite> <quote>That's some margin of error... </quote> JUST FACTS! (this seems like the name someone would give a think tank if they were someone who debates about gender by citing chromosomes, or only talks about obesity in reference to CICO)</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
creativerealms 06/21/17 1:57:47 PM #33:	BillyKidd posted... Kim Kusanagi posted... Giant_Aspirin posted... The research organization Just Facts, a widely cited, independent think tank led by self-described conservatives and libertarians, not an argument A conservative news source uses a conservative think tank to back up their pre conceived notions. That is an argument one you would have used to dismiss the information if it was a liberal news source using a liberal think tank. --- when you stub your toes it's the SJWs fualt. <cite>creativerealms posted [p:881544403] in So studies... [t:75486339]...</cite> <quote><cite>BillyKidd posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Kim Kusanagi posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Giant_Aspirin posted...</cite> <quote>The research organization Just Facts, a widely cited, independent think tank led by self-described conservatives and libertarians, </quote> </quote> not an argument</quote> A conservative news source uses a conservative think tank to back up their pre conceived notions. That is an argument one you would have used to dismiss the information if it was a liberal news source using a liberal think tank.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
UrCa1988 06/21/17 1:59:30 PM #34:	I like how voter fraud goes from a maybe once a year occurrence to 6 million in one election. And of these 6 million cases, the only one I'm aware of was a woman in Idaho who voted for Trump, lmao. --- "Sometimes, all the stupidity in the world is boiled down to one single product that you can buy at Home Depot." <cite>UrCa1988 posted [p:881544517] in So studies... [t:75486339]...</cite> <quote>I like how voter fraud goes from a maybe once a year occurrence to 6 million in one election. And of these 6 million cases, the only one I'm aware of was a woman in Idaho who voted for Trump, lmao.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TendoDRM 06/21/17 2:08:43 PM #35:	UrCa1988 posted... I like how voter fraud goes from a maybe once a year occurrence to 6 million in one election. And of these 6 million cases, the only one I'm aware of was a woman in Idaho who voted for Trump, lmao. Don't forget Trump's family members being registered in multiple states! --- Cel Damage! Tonight at 8:00! <cite>TendoDRM posted [p:881545114] in So studies... [t:75486339]...</cite> <quote><cite>UrCa1988 posted...</cite> <quote>I like how voter fraud goes from a maybe once a year occurrence to 6 million in one election. And of these 6 million cases, the only one I'm aware of was a woman in Idaho who voted for Trump, lmao.</quote> Don't forget Trump's family members being registered in multiple states!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CableZL 06/21/17 2:11:36 PM #36:	TendoDRM posted... UrCa1988 posted... I like how voter fraud goes from a maybe once a year occurrence to 6 million in one election. And of these 6 million cases, the only one I'm aware of was a woman in Idaho who voted for Trump, lmao. Don't forget Trump's family members being registered in multiple states! They're new at government. They're still learning. --- http://i.imgur.com/ByKGlJb.gif http://i.imgur.com/nZdaA8D.gif http://i.imgur.com/VBLBILg.jpg <cite>CableZL posted [p:881545301] in So studies... [t:75486339]...</cite> <quote><cite>TendoDRM posted...</cite> <quote><cite>UrCa1988 posted...</cite> <quote>I like how voter fraud goes from a maybe once a year occurrence to 6 million in one election. And of these 6 million cases, the only one I'm aware of was a woman in Idaho who voted for Trump, lmao.</quote> Don't forget Trump's family members being registered in multiple states!</quote> They're new at government. They're still learning.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Lord_of_BeefDip 06/21/17 2:18:44 PM #37:	BillyKidd posted... billcom6 posted... 1. No he didn't. 2. If non citizens cast votes, we are just going to assume THEY ALL voted for Hillary? I mean I know that is what is best for Trump's fragile ego to make him think he didn't lose the popular vote, but c'mon. 1) Yes he did. He said it was like 3 million, not almost 6. 2) You really think they are going to vote for the guy that said multiple times he's going to fly them back to their country of origin? Yet this is all based on conjecture and hearsay. Not only would most illegals avoid any federal place, but doubly would most not want to take the risk of being caught and deported. Next, I find it funny that when Trump was ahead in the popular vote count, that there was little mention of illegal votes. Then when Hillary pulled ahead by a quarter million, suddenly around that many illegals voted. Then when she was up half a million, the number of illegals supposedly voting was half a million. Rinse and repeat, move some goalposts, and she ended up winning the popular vote by 2.9 million and now the most convenient number is that just over 3 million illegals voted. Nevermind that there was never any proof for the initial number accused, that was handwaived as fact and the goal moved. It is absurd, and pretty telling of just how thin skinned so many of you are that you have to run with a bogus conspiracy theory in order to feel better about losing the popular. What really sinks this is that somehow the Democrats were clever enough to get 3 million + votes that were by non citizens, yet were dumb enough to just mostly pad solid blue states. If they were really such Machiavellian geniuses, why not spread a couple hundred thousand across Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin, thus winning what unfortunately actually matters, the EC. Or given the margins and number of illegal immigrants in Texas, just pile a million extra onto that state and flip it blue. --- http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/1343-unofficial-nintendo-switch-board My board for discussion of the NS, and other Nintendo related subjects. <cite>Lord_of_BeefDip posted [p:881545747] in So studies... [t:75486339]...</cite> <quote><cite>BillyKidd posted...</cite> <quote><cite>billcom6 posted...</cite> <quote>1. No he didn't. 2. If non citizens cast votes, we are just going to assume THEY ALL voted for Hillary? I mean I know that is what is best for Trump's fragile ego to make him think he didn't lose the popular vote, but c'mon.</quote> 1) Yes he did. He said it was like 3 million, not almost 6. 2) You really think they are going to vote for the guy that said multiple times he's going to fly them back to their country of origin?</quote> Yet this is all based on conjecture and hearsay. Not only would most illegals avoid any federal place, but doubly would most not want to take the risk of being caught and deported. Next, I find it funny that when Trump was ahead in the popular vote count, that there was little mention of illegal votes. Then when Hillary pulled ahead by a quarter million, suddenly around that many illegals voted. Then when she was up half a million, the number of illegals supposedly voting was half a million. Rinse and repeat, move some goalposts, and she ended up winning the popular vote by 2.9 million and now the most convenient number is that just over 3 million illegals voted. Nevermind that there was never any proof for the initial number accused, that was handwaived as fact and the goal moved. It is absurd, and pretty telling of just how thin skinned so many of you are that you have to run with a bogus conspiracy theory in order to feel better about losing the popular. What really sinks this is that somehow the Democrats were clever enough to get 3 million + votes that were by non citizens, yet were dumb enough to just mostly pad solid blue states. If they were really such Machiavellian geniuses, why not spread a couple hundred thousand across Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin, thus winning what unfortunately actually matters, the EC. Or given the margins and number of illegal immigrants in Texas, just pile a million extra onto that state and flip it blue.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Amputee 06/21/17 2:26:34 PM #38:	Lord_of_BeefDip posted... BillyKidd posted... billcom6 posted... 1. No he didn't. 2. If non citizens cast votes, we are just going to assume THEY ALL voted for Hillary? I mean I know that is what is best for Trump's fragile ego to make him think he didn't lose the popular vote, but c'mon. 1) Yes he did. He said it was like 3 million, not almost 6. 2) You really think they are going to vote for the guy that said multiple times he's going to fly them back to their country of origin? Yet this is all based on conjecture and hearsay. Not only would most illegals avoid any federal place, but doubly would most not want to take the risk of being caught and deported. Next, I find it funny that when Trump was ahead in the popular vote count, that there was little mention of illegal votes. Then when Hillary pulled ahead by a quarter million, suddenly around that many illegals voted. Then when she was up half a million, the number of illegals supposedly voting was half a million. Rinse and repeat, move some goalposts, and she ended up winning the popular vote by 2.9 million and now the most convenient number is that just over 3 million illegals voted. Nevermind that there was never any proof for the initial number accused, that was handwaived as fact and the goal moved. It is absurd, and pretty telling of just how thin skinned so many of you are that you have to run with a bogus conspiracy theory in order to feel better about losing the popular. What really sinks this is that somehow the Democrats were clever enough to get 3 million + votes that were by non citizens, yet were dumb enough to just mostly pad solid blue states. If they were really such Machiavellian geniuses, why not spread a couple hundred thousand across Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin, thus winning what unfortunately actually matters, the EC. Or given the margins and number of illegal immigrants in Texas, just pile a million extra onto that state and flip it blue. --- I've been amputated! <cite>Amputee posted [p:881546235] in So studies... [t:75486339]...</cite> <quote><cite>Lord_of_BeefDip posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BillyKidd posted...</cite> <quote><cite>billcom6 posted...</cite> <quote>1. No he didn't. 2. If non citizens cast votes, we are just going to assume THEY ALL voted for Hillary? I mean I know that is what is best for Trump's fragile ego to make him think he didn't lose the popular vote, but c'mon.</quote> 1) Yes he did. He said it was like 3 million, not almost 6. 2) You really think they are going to vote for the guy that said multiple times he's going to fly them back to their country of origin?</quote> Yet this is all based on conjecture and hearsay. Not only would most illegals avoid any federal place, but doubly would most not want to take the risk of being caught and deported. Next, I find it funny that when Trump was ahead in the popular vote count, that there was little mention of illegal votes. Then when Hillary pulled ahead by a quarter million, suddenly around that many illegals voted. Then when she was up half a million, the number of illegals supposedly voting was half a million. Rinse and repeat, move some goalposts, and she ended up winning the popular vote by 2.9 million and now the most convenient number is that just over 3 million illegals voted. Nevermind that there was never any proof for the initial number accused, that was handwaived as fact and the goal moved. It is absurd, and pretty telling of just how thin skinned so many of you are that you have to run with a bogus conspiracy theory in order to feel better about losing the popular. What really sinks this is that somehow the Democrats were clever enough to get 3 million + votes that were by non citizens, yet were dumb enough to just mostly pad solid blue states. If they were really such Machiavellian geniuses, why not spread a couple hundred thousand across Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin, thus winning what unfortunately actually matters, the EC. Or given the margins and number of illegal immigrants in Texas, just pile a million extra onto that state and flip it blue.</quote> </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Axiom 06/21/17 2:36:22 PM #39:	I tagged TC as fake news awhile ago. I guess I won't be removing it anytime soon <cite>Axiom posted [p:881546814] in So studies... [t:75486339]...</cite> <quote>I tagged TC as fake news awhile ago. I guess I won't be removing it anytime soon</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
HylianFox 06/21/17 2:37:40 PM #40:	The research organization Just Facts, a widely cited, independent think tank led by self-described conservatives and libertarians, lmao --- I like my beer cold, my TV loud, and my homosexuals FUH-LAMING! - Homer Simpson i.imgur.com/a2EzoIs.gif i.imgur.com/rPcGRiP.gif <cite>HylianFox posted [p:881546884] in So studies... [t:75486339]...</cite> <quote><quote>The research organization Just Facts, a widely cited, independent think tank led by self-described conservatives and libertarians, </quote> lmao</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BillyKidd 06/21/17 3:28:05 PM #41:	Lord_of_BeefDip posted... BillyKidd posted... billcom6 posted... 1. No he didn't. 2. If non citizens cast votes, we are just going to assume THEY ALL voted for Hillary? I mean I know that is what is best for Trump's fragile ego to make him think he didn't lose the popular vote, but c'mon. 1) Yes he did. He said it was like 3 million, not almost 6. 2) You really think they are going to vote for the guy that said multiple times he's going to fly them back to their country of origin? Yet this is all based on conjecture and hearsay. Not only would most illegals avoid any federal place, but doubly would most not want to take the risk of being caught and deported. Next, I find it funny that when Trump was ahead in the popular vote count, that there was little mention of illegal votes. Then when Hillary pulled ahead by a quarter million, suddenly around that many illegals voted. Then when she was up half a million, the number of illegals supposedly voting was half a million. Rinse and repeat, move some goalposts, and she ended up winning the popular vote by 2.9 million and now the most convenient number is that just over 3 million illegals voted. Nevermind that there was never any proof for the initial number accused, that was handwaived as fact and the goal moved. It is absurd, and pretty telling of just how thin skinned so many of you are that you have to run with a bogus conspiracy theory in order to feel better about losing the popular. What really sinks this is that somehow the Democrats were clever enough to get 3 million + votes that were by non citizens, yet were dumb enough to just mostly pad solid blue states. If they were really such Machiavellian geniuses, why not spread a couple hundred thousand across Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin, thus winning what unfortunately actually matters, the EC. Or given the margins and number of illegal immigrants in Texas, just pile a million extra onto that state and flip it blue. Why did they stop recounting votes in Michigan? --- Tho I walk through the valley of death, I shall fear no evil. For I'm the meanest mofo in the whole f'n valley http://i.imgur.com/4GzX1.jpg <cite>BillyKidd posted [p:881550043] in So studies... [t:75486339]...</cite> <quote><cite>Lord_of_BeefDip posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BillyKidd posted...</cite> <quote><cite>billcom6 posted...</cite> <quote>1. No he didn't. 2. If non citizens cast votes, we are just going to assume THEY ALL voted for Hillary? I mean I know that is what is best for Trump's fragile ego to make him think he didn't lose the popular vote, but c'mon.</quote> 1) Yes he did. He said it was like 3 million, not almost 6. 2) You really think they are going to vote for the guy that said multiple times he's going to fly them back to their country of origin?</quote> Yet this is all based on conjecture and hearsay. Not only would most illegals avoid any federal place, but doubly would most not want to take the risk of being caught and deported. Next, I find it funny that when Trump was ahead in the popular vote count, that there was little mention of illegal votes. Then when Hillary pulled ahead by a quarter million, suddenly around that many illegals voted. Then when she was up half a million, the number of illegals supposedly voting was half a million. Rinse and repeat, move some goalposts, and she ended up winning the popular vote by 2.9 million and now the most convenient number is that just over 3 million illegals voted. Nevermind that there was never any proof for the initial number accused, that was handwaived as fact and the goal moved. It is absurd, and pretty telling of just how thin skinned so many of you are that you have to run with a bogus conspiracy theory in order to feel better about losing the popular. What really sinks this is that somehow the Democrats were clever enough to get 3 million + votes that were by non citizens, yet were dumb enough to just mostly pad solid blue states. If they were really such Machiavellian geniuses, why not spread a couple hundred thousand across Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin, thus winning what unfortunately actually matters, the EC. Or given the margins and number of illegal immigrants in Texas, just pile a million extra onto that state and flip it blue.</quote> Why did they stop recounting votes in Michigan?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Amputee 06/21/17 3:30:32 PM #42:	BillyKidd posted... Lord_of_BeefDip posted... BillyKidd posted... billcom6 posted... 1. No he didn't. 2. If non citizens cast votes, we are just going to assume THEY ALL voted for Hillary? I mean I know that is what is best for Trump's fragile ego to make him think he didn't lose the popular vote, but c'mon. 1) Yes he did. He said it was like 3 million, not almost 6. 2) You really think they are going to vote for the guy that said multiple times he's going to fly them back to their country of origin? Yet this is all based on conjecture and hearsay. Not only would most illegals avoid any federal place, but doubly would most not want to take the risk of being caught and deported. Next, I find it funny that when Trump was ahead in the popular vote count, that there was little mention of illegal votes. Then when Hillary pulled ahead by a quarter million, suddenly around that many illegals voted. Then when she was up half a million, the number of illegals supposedly voting was half a million. Rinse and repeat, move some goalposts, and she ended up winning the popular vote by 2.9 million and now the most convenient number is that just over 3 million illegals voted. Nevermind that there was never any proof for the initial number accused, that was handwaived as fact and the goal moved. It is absurd, and pretty telling of just how thin skinned so many of you are that you have to run with a bogus conspiracy theory in order to feel better about losing the popular. What really sinks this is that somehow the Democrats were clever enough to get 3 million + votes that were by non citizens, yet were dumb enough to just mostly pad solid blue states. If they were really such Machiavellian geniuses, why not spread a couple hundred thousand across Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin, thus winning what unfortunately actually matters, the EC. Or given the margins and number of illegal immigrants in Texas, just pile a million extra onto that state and flip it blue. Why did they stop recounting votes in Michigan? You got fucking wrecked, move on, "fake news" (tagged user as) --- I've been amputated! <cite>Amputee posted [p:881550198] in So studies... [t:75486339]...</cite> <quote><cite>BillyKidd posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Lord_of_BeefDip posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BillyKidd posted...</cite> <quote><cite>billcom6 posted...</cite> <quote>1. No he didn't. 2. If non citizens cast votes, we are just going to assume THEY ALL voted for Hillary? I mean I know that is what is best for Trump's fragile ego to make him think he didn't lose the popular vote, but c'mon.</quote> 1) Yes he did. He said it was like 3 million, not almost 6. 2) You really think they are going to vote for the guy that said multiple times he's going to fly them back to their country of origin?</quote> Yet this is all based on conjecture and hearsay. Not only would most illegals avoid any federal place, but doubly would most not want to take the risk of being caught and deported. Next, I find it funny that when Trump was ahead in the popular vote count, that there was little mention of illegal votes. Then when Hillary pulled ahead by a quarter million, suddenly around that many illegals voted. Then when she was up half a million, the number of illegals supposedly voting was half a million. Rinse and repeat, move some goalposts, and she ended up winning the popular vote by 2.9 million and now the most convenient number is that just over 3 million illegals voted. Nevermind that there was never any proof for the initial number accused, that was handwaived as fact and the goal moved. It is absurd, and pretty telling of just how thin skinned so many of you are that you have to run with a bogus conspiracy theory in order to feel better about losing the popular. What really sinks this is that somehow the Democrats were clever enough to get 3 million + votes that were by non citizens, yet were dumb enough to just mostly pad solid blue states. If they were really such Machiavellian geniuses, why not spread a couple hundred thousand across Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin, thus winning what unfortunately actually matters, the EC. Or given the margins and number of illegal immigrants in Texas, just pile a million extra onto that state and flip it blue.</quote> Why did they stop recounting votes in Michigan?</quote> You got fucking wrecked, move on, "fake news" (tagged user as)</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hockeybub89 06/21/17 3:31:09 PM #43:	"Studies show" --- http://card.psnprofiles.com/1/NIR_Hockey.png http://www.last.fm/user/hockeybub89/ <cite>hockeybub89 posted [p:881550225] in So studies... [t:75486339]...</cite> <quote>"Studies show"</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
southcoast09 06/21/17 3:32:31 PM #44:	Amputee posted... BillyKidd posted... http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jun/19/noncitizen-illegal-vote-number-higher-than-estimat/ Apparently, Trump underestimated how many illegals voted. When is this guy going to stop winning? This is 100% false. Breaking news: a conservative leaning think-tank says something without presenting facts BTW the Washington Times is conservative, in post 3 you refer to them as "liberal". Ignorance is unbecoming. No, the denial and belligerence is what is unbecoming. Your party was too in-your-face and you lost the election. You take hillarys dead votes, double votes, and illegal votes away and trump won hands down. No argument. --- Donald Trump voter <cite>southcoast09 posted [p:881550300] in So studies... [t:75486339]...</cite> <quote><cite>Amputee posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BillyKidd posted...</cite> <quote>http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jun/19/noncitizen-illegal-vote-number-higher-than-estimat/ Apparently, Trump underestimated how many illegals voted. When is this guy going to stop winning?</quote> This is 100% false. Breaking news: a conservative leaning think-tank says something without presenting facts BTW the Washington Times is conservative, in post 3 you refer to them as "liberal". Ignorance is unbecoming.</quote> No, the denial and belligerence is what is unbecoming. Your party was too in-your-face and you lost the election. You take hillarys dead votes, double votes, and illegal votes away and trump won hands down. No argument.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Amputee 06/21/17 3:36:49 PM #45:	southcoast09 posted... Amputee posted... BillyKidd posted... http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jun/19/noncitizen-illegal-vote-number-higher-than-estimat/ Apparently, Trump underestimated how many illegals voted. When is this guy going to stop winning? This is 100% false. Breaking news: a conservative leaning think-tank says something without presenting facts BTW the Washington Times is conservative, in post 3 you refer to them as "liberal". Ignorance is unbecoming. No, the denial and belligerence is what is unbecoming. Your party was too in-your-face and you lost the election. You take hillarys dead votes, double votes, and illegal votes away and trump won hands down. No argument. --- I've been amputated! <cite>Amputee posted [p:881550555] in So studies... [t:75486339]...</cite> <quote><cite>southcoast09 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Amputee posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BillyKidd posted...</cite> <quote>http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jun/19/noncitizen-illegal-vote-number-higher-than-estimat/ Apparently, Trump underestimated how many illegals voted. When is this guy going to stop winning?</quote> This is 100% false. Breaking news: a conservative leaning think-tank says something without presenting facts BTW the Washington Times is conservative, in post 3 you refer to them as "liberal". Ignorance is unbecoming.</quote> No, the denial and belligerence is what is unbecoming. Your party was too in-your-face and you lost the election. You take hillarys dead votes, double votes, and illegal votes away and trump won hands down. No argument.</quote> </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
marc55 06/21/17 3:39:42 PM #46:	shockthemonkey posted... Xxlv20xX posted... Am I missing something or does this story only mention studies that dealt with the 2008 and 2012 elections? You're not missing anything TC probably did lol --- There is no sound, no voice, no cry in all the world that can be heard... until someone listens. <cite>marc55 posted [p:881550721] in So studies... [t:75486339]...</cite> <quote><cite>shockthemonkey posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Xxlv20xX posted...</cite> <quote>Am I missing something or does this story only mention studies that dealt with the 2008 and 2012 elections?</quote> You're not missing anything</quote> TC probably did lol</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BillyKidd 06/21/17 3:41:56 PM #47:	marc55 posted... shockthemonkey posted... Xxlv20xX posted... Am I missing something or does this story only mention studies that dealt with the 2008 and 2012 elections? You're not missing anything TC probably did lol no, if that many voted in 2008, who exactly do you think they are going to vote for? The guy who said he's going to kick them out? It takes time to fact check and go through individual ballots. --- Tho I walk through the valley of death, I shall fear no evil. For I'm the meanest mofo in the whole f'n valley http://i.imgur.com/4GzX1.jpg <cite>BillyKidd posted [p:881550860] in So studies... [t:75486339]...</cite> <quote><cite>marc55 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>shockthemonkey posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Xxlv20xX posted...</cite> <quote>Am I missing something or does this story only mention studies that dealt with the 2008 and 2012 elections?</quote> You're not missing anything</quote> TC probably did lol</quote> no, if that many voted in 2008, who exactly do you think they are going to vote for? The guy who said he's going to kick them out? It takes time to fact check and go through individual ballots.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#48	Post #48 was unavailable or deleted.
CableZL 06/21/17 3:45:11 PM #49:	BillyKidd posted... no, if that many voted in 2008, who exactly do you think they are going to vote for? The guy who said he's going to kick them out? It takes time to fact check and go through individual ballots. There has been no evidence to suggest that millions of illegal votes happened in any US election in the first place. --- http://i.imgur.com/ByKGlJb.gif http://i.imgur.com/nZdaA8D.gif http://i.imgur.com/VBLBILg.jpg <cite>CableZL posted [p:881551031] in So studies... [t:75486339]...</cite> <quote><cite>BillyKidd posted...</cite> <quote>no, if that many voted in 2008, who exactly do you think they are going to vote for? The guy who said he's going to kick them out? It takes time to fact check and go through individual ballots. </quote> There has been no evidence to suggest that millions of illegal votes happened in any US election in the first place.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Butterfiles 06/21/17 3:50:29 PM #50:	Guys I admit it I stuffed the ballot I voted 3 million times For Gary Johnson --- http://www.last.fm/user/PigBun 56k warning <cite>Butterfiles posted [p:881551305] in So studies... [t:75486339]...</cite> <quote>Guys I admit it I stuffed the ballot I voted 3 million times For Gary Johnson</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2

Current Events > So studies show Trump won the popular vote too (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > So studies show Trump won the popular vote too