LogFAQs > #978999310

KanWan posted...

I think if its for practical means, it makes sense to use AI. I wouldnt consider adaptive tree paths via AI in conversation as part of the art in creating good dialogue. Its whether or not the original details in the question deliver a means for which good content could be derived from.

Im more regular, if it comes from AI, a blanket statement of its not art slapped on settles all of humanity even with the human element to guide the creation

Its just automatically disqualified, why? It doesnt matter. If someone chooses to incorporate it into something, that is the artistic merit. But none of the creation. None of the award.

Art has been subjective and it will probably always be.. a weird wonky stipulation should be added for variety.

I can easily equate it to using gym equipment to work out, and alternatively have that equipment move your body for you. There's no refinement or improvement of oneself or skills.

If it for practical means, sure. But art is recreational. No reason for automation.