Lurker > STEROLIZER

LurkerFAQs, Active Database ( 12.01.2023-present ), DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Board List
Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 12
TopicThey got Hollywood Jeff
STEROLIZER
04/25/24 6:41:20 PM
#177
TheGoldenEel posted...
I remember that topic, and I believe the vibe was that the event you were at was really lame and its lame to take videos of a party to prove to CE youre cool

Sure, whatever. Thats why I stopped.

However, I still got people to this day who will die on the hill that I wasnt there

Some people are so offended by other people doing cool things theyll head cannon themselves into thinking that theyre actually the cool ones for NOT doing anything because braggarts bad.

But seriously, these communities use to not be so toxic.
TopicThey got Hollywood Jeff
STEROLIZER
04/25/24 6:39:17 PM
#175
LonelyStoner posted...
Makes sense. Especially with a DJ that wears a novelty head. (Looking at you Deadmaus and Marshmello)

Shit it actually was Marshmello for that particular topic, the DeadMau one was from NYC a few months before.
TopicbOTh SIdeS
STEROLIZER
04/25/24 6:36:47 PM
#39
creativerealms posted...
One side wants free health care and the other side wants to take healthcare away. They are the same.

They arent the same, and thats the point. You need to convince the anti-healthcare people to change their minds and become pro-healthcare people
TopicbOTh SIdeS
STEROLIZER
04/25/24 6:35:45 PM
#38
lolife67 posted...
This is woefully ignorant as to what actually happened. Slavery didn't end because of dialogue and neither was it the reason black people gained civil rights.

The war was started via a dialogue, and the end of the war was resolved via a dialogue and how the country moved forward from that point on required a lot of dialogue.

Besides in this day and age do we really prefer war over diplomacy?
TopicbOTh SIdeS
STEROLIZER
04/25/24 6:31:50 PM
#35
Deej posted...
Is that what happened?

Of course it is. Everytime a president of a different political party is elected its because they got more votes than the competition.

So if the previous president was republican and the new one is democrat then it means that there were more democratic voters this election than there was the prior election.

Swing voters are a thing right? People who flip-flop back and forth. Those are the ones that win elections and you dont nab them by pointing a finger and screaming at them.
TopicThey got Hollywood Jeff
STEROLIZER
04/25/24 6:22:16 PM
#154
bsp77 posted...
He has posted enough proof. Quit shitposting

I tried making some posts about cool parties I was at like two or three years ago. I think I made a topic every week for like a month, and no matter how many photos I posted people would continue to sleuth and try to prove I wasnt actually there.

I was in the VIP of a Deadmau party for a crypto event, and someone noticed the sign had the previous years date on it. So everyone tried to use that as proof that I wasnt really there.

I then made a video of myself and my buddy picking up said sign on the bar, and asking the bartender why it had the wrong date, and he said they had them in storage from the previous years conference.

Video got me suspended because their was swearing in the video, and then later I got hit for one of the photos of the club because some of the artwork was offensive and people in the topic bragged about marking it.

CE just really doesnt like braggarts it didnt use to be like that. You use to be able to post photos of yourself at E3 or ComicCon and folks would be super interested and excited. They would encourage to go take photos of particular booths, or talks.

Two summers ago when so went to ComicCon I was suspended for trying to share my experiences. I dont actually remember what exactly got hit, but the general vibe of the topic was that of spite and disgust for trying to brag about being there.
TopicThey got Hollywood Jeff
STEROLIZER
04/25/24 6:07:25 PM
#136
Dakimakura posted...
Look, it is one of those bad faith posters DToast tried to warn us about.

I am deathly serious. This place has gotten a little too introverted for its own good. Its not very conducive to user growth.

Especially if Fandom has any intent on running any paid marketing campaigns for user aquisitionbecause a big chunk of that userbase is going to come from traditional social media like Facebook & Instagram.

In which case, it cant be so taboo when it comes to the vibe and culture of GameFaqs to talk about your accomplishments and daily life.

The quarantine actually helps keep that type of atmosphere contained to just this one forum, so that type of introverted energy doesnt leak into the gaming boards where these new users are getting dropped off at.
TopicThey got Hollywood Jeff
STEROLIZER
04/25/24 6:02:51 PM
#121
LonelyStoner posted...
Hes not simply talking positively about his life. Ive seen this behavior in many people I know irl and Ive been guilty of it at times.

There was once a time where people on GameFaqs could post photos of them at conventions or concerts and actually meet up with other GameFaq users. Nowadays if you do that people will label you a braggart and start their hate train.

This place became beyond introverted during the post covid era. Like, internet communities always leaned introvertbut its gotten fairly radicalized here on CE in the past couple of years.

TopicThey got Hollywood Jeff
STEROLIZER
04/25/24 5:59:06 PM
#113
RobertMuldoon posted...
A stupid thing to get in trouble for, but he comes off as a braggart a lot of times.

Well on CE you could make a topic about celebrating your one year aniversary with your wife and people will tag you as a braggart
TopicThey got Hollywood Jeff
STEROLIZER
04/25/24 5:57:32 PM
#109
VeggetaX posted...
What's your beef with him?

Jeff often goes outside and does cool things. That can be triggering to some people.
TopicbOTh SIdeS
STEROLIZER
04/25/24 5:48:48 PM
#26
EPR-radar posted...
Republicans have been all in on total partisan warfare at least since Gingrich made it official in 1994. That's 30 fucking years ago. How much longer is everyone else supposed to put up with their crap?

You dont. You continue the dialogue and slowly bring people over the line, like by little, but by bit.

It was working. Thats how Obama beat Bush, but then we just got complacent and started screaming at the other side again. That caused people to hop back over the line. Then Trump got elected.

It should have been pretty easy to get him out, because he was incompetent. But people dug in their heels and screamed louder. So people dug in their heels and completely doubled down on Trump.

Thank god he was so incompetent that enough folks did leap back over the line in spite of many voices on the left doing everything within their power to basically scream stay on your side of the line, we dont want you over here

But the truth is that we did want them over here. Because we needed their votes to get Trump out of office. Now we are in a position where we are screaming at them to get back to their side of the line, and they actually might. Which is not what we want, cuz losing votes to the other side is not conducive to getting reelected.

Its just common sense. Also this is the most politics Ive ever discussed on GameFaqs. I like this new quarantine, it feels way more safe to be able to have these discussions than it did in the past.
TopicbOTh SIdeS
STEROLIZER
04/25/24 4:40:13 PM
#16
ChocoboMogALT posted...
Imagine this argument for historical certain issues.
Civil rights for Black people? Or total segregation?
Women's voting rights?
Gay marriage?

Stero: Everything in moderation.

We were able to conquer those issues by having that dialogue. In all if those cases, being able to communicate with the entirety of the human race allowed us to gain enough support to fix those issues, or at least get in the right path to fixing those atrocities.

If one side just completely insulted and harassed the other without making any real attempt to legitimately show them the error of their ways, then change wouldnt have happened, or at least not at rate that it did.

You dont want to motivate the opposition to just dig in their heels.

TopicbOTh SIdeS
STEROLIZER
04/25/24 4:36:23 PM
#14
EPR-radar posted...
Yes, all of them, because everyone that votes for Republicans is voting for subordination of women etc.

Then how do you change that? The best way to defeat such a party is to steal their voters. Thats not done by refusing to have a dialogue, or by insulting them and thus giving them reasons to stay on their side of the line.
TopicbOTh SIdeS
STEROLIZER
04/25/24 4:02:26 PM
#11
EPR-radar posted...
It's not difficult to understand where Republicans are coming from. The issue is that what they want is simply unacceptable, scapegoating of minorities for political gain and the subordination of women being just two items on a very long list, all so that the filthy rich can get marginally richer at everyone else's expense.

Not all of them. You gotta talk to them about the nuance if you want that slightly right leaning person to eventually switch over to slightly left and vote accordingly.

Refusing to have the dialogue or pigeonholing them into a box with the worst of the worst only widens the divide. It doesnt lead to any meaningful change.
TopicbOTh SIdeS
STEROLIZER
04/25/24 3:49:00 PM
#8
Being radical in anything isnt very beneficial and that goes for everything including politics. Everything is better with nuance for moderation.

Its common sense that people are complicated creatures that will never fit tightly into any particular box, and I always found it pretty preposterous that both sides is quoted like some sort of damning revelation to discredit a persons opinion or character.

It doesnt make sense to me. Ive always been of the belief that true intelligence is the ability to step out of ones box and being able to understand another persons perspective you dont have to agree with it, but you can at least make an attempt to understand it by placing yourself in their shoes.

That ability to see beyond ones own individual beliefs and moral compass is typically how discussions that lead to drastic change for the benefit of all humanity comes to be. At no point in the existence of humanity have we ever rid ourselves of a problem that plagues humanity by simply refusing to have a dialogue. It just doesnt work.

Even in the moments where change did mostly happen by force or the sheer unbeatable will of a collective community united through a single beliefdid it come from refusing to have a dialogue.

Problems dont solve themselves. In that regard I dont understand the both sides statement being used as a means of insulting or discrediting someone.

It just seems like something thats blurted out by people who are too radicalized in either direction of the political spectrum as an excuse to stay firm in their current positions and not think outside the box. Or at worst, its used in bad faith as a means to gaslight or troll.

Even if you dont have why intention of changing ones stance, its still best communication practices to try and see all sides of every issue because if you dont, then nothing happens. Things just remain the same.

Or at least thats my two cents on the matter. But what do I know. Im just some guy.
TopicWhy do several people here act as though they have no flaws?
STEROLIZER
04/25/24 3:07:43 PM
#36
GrandConjuraton posted...
?

Everyone has flaws, but its confidence in oneself to overcome those flaws, improve upon one's deficiencies, and rise to the top in spite of these things that are conducive of real world success.

Some people watch others achieve this by overcompensating for their flaws, or refusing to acknowledge them, and incorrectly categorize the behavior as arrogance, ignorance, or a combination of both -- but in reality people aren't trying to lie to themselves about their flaws, they are are just trying to rise above them.

For instance, I get accused of this alot. But I am just as flawed as everyone else. I just don't see the point on dwelling on those flaws. Hollwood Jeff, @Kylo_Ren_ , and some others get accused of "pretending to be flawless" all the time. But they aren't, and if you actually care to ask them, they'll admit their flaws.

Its just that unless they have a reason to address them, why would they...and honestly why would anybody else?
TopicCurrent Events got the LUE treatment and is now a private board. Part 3
STEROLIZER
04/25/24 3:02:40 PM
#436
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com./user.php?db=.0.user=Heartomaton

Any update on Heato, was that before or after the quarantine?
TopicCurrent Events got the LUE treatment and is now a private board. Part 3
STEROLIZER
04/25/24 3:01:54 PM
#435
I guess I don't agree w/ the Kate Hudson topic. It was just Jeff explaining about something interesting that happened in his life. But, I mean, at least it sets a precedent. We now know exactly where the line is. In a way Hollywood Jeff died for our sins.

But seriously guys, there is a Sex Board for a reason. Just use that. What is the point of even risking it.

Now granted the Sex board is mostly for relationship advice, and really weird horny posting isn't allowed -- but the line isn't so thin over there.
TopicCurrent Events got the LUE treatment and is now a private board. Part 3
STEROLIZER
04/25/24 2:56:49 PM
#431
Pikachuchupika posted...
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com./user.php?db=.0.user=jeffhardyb0yz

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com./user.php?db=.0.user=Jeffhardyboyz <-- better than this one at least
Topicwhat is your strangest hobby?
STEROLIZER
04/24/24 7:46:43 PM
#21
I fight people in cages and pits
TopicDonald J. Trump as gone too far with his latest Truth!
STEROLIZER
04/24/24 3:35:29 PM
#7
DToast posted...
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/f/fe3984da.jpg

The fork in the road.
TopicThe thought of probably spending $18k a year to live on my own seems crazy
STEROLIZER
04/22/24 3:52:53 PM
#43
ItsNotA2Mer posted...
San Francisco =/= everywhere. The national average pay for a Starbucks barista is approximately $15 an hour.

Thats still like 30 grand or something
TopicWhy was the GameFAQs moderations reddit set to private?
STEROLIZER
04/22/24 12:41:09 PM
#241
DoesntMatter posted...
i wouldn't have had to if the sub had ever been moderated properly in the first place. i wasn't just reporting random shit for no reason. everything i reported were things i viewed as violations of reddit content policy. when i first came across that sub, and had a look back and saw months and months worth of rampant and unchecked harassment, bigotry, hate speech, unhinged rants, etc. etc., i was absolutely appalled. your unwillingness to properly moderate the subreddit you made is what led to the chuds who inhabited it getting bolder and bolder and going off the deep end with their delusions of persecution and retribution. you gave them what was effectively a safe space for them to reinforce each others' delusions and ego-driven antics. you enabled them.

QFT

TopicThe thought of probably spending $18k a year to live on my own seems crazy
STEROLIZER
04/22/24 12:34:25 PM
#36
DarthAragorn posted...
fuck off

federal minimum wage is like $15k a year

You make 22 dollars an hour as a Starbucks barista here in San Francisco
TopicWCW's cruiserweight division was legitimate..
STEROLIZER
04/22/24 1:03:29 AM
#84
Found one without the watermark
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/c/ca067702.jpg
Topic68,116 users have access to CE. Only 300 joined the GameFAQs/CE discord.
STEROLIZER
04/22/24 12:39:51 AM
#10
To be fair there are like 5 discord channels. I clicked a bunch of links and now im confused on what is what
TopicWCW's cruiserweight division was legitimate..
STEROLIZER
04/21/24 8:05:22 PM
#83
Alright, I think that I managed the rank every single person to ever compete in the WCW Cruiserweight division

Some of the event on to great things elsewhere. Im just ranking what I remember of their WCW runs.

Did I miss anyone?

  1. Rey Mysterio
  2. Chris Jericho
  3. Eddie Guerrero
  4. Alex Wright
  5. La Parka
  6. Jushin Liger
  7. Ultimo Dragon
  8. Brian Pillman
  9. Chris Benoit
  10. Disco Inferno
  11. Syxx
  12. Juvetude Guerrera
  13. Billy Kidman
  14. Dean Malenko
  15. Blitzkrieg
  16. Psicosis
  17. Shane Helms
  18. Chavo Guerrero
  19. Lance Storm
  20. Tokyo Magnum
  21. Jimmy Yang
  22. AJ Styles
  23. El Dandy
  24. Silver King
  25. Los Villanos
  26. Super Calo
  27. Hector Garza
  28. Damien
  29. Ciclope
  30. Lizmark
  31. Kaz Hayashi
  32. Jamie Noble
  33. Lash LaRoux
  34. Shannon Moore
  35. Chris Candido
  36. Mr JL
  37. Elix Skipper
  38. Crowbar
  39. Lenny Lane
  40. Lodi
  41. Mikey Whipwreck
  42. Jimmy Del Ray
  43. Brad Armstrong
  44. Marty Janetty
  45. Yugi Nagata
  46. Stevie Richards
  47. Kid Kash
  48. Shark Boy
  49. Christopher Daniels
  50. Tony Marmaluke
  51. Lil Romeo
  52. Gedo
  53. Shinjiro Ohtani
  54. Koji Kanemoto
  55. Gran Hamada
  56. El Samurai
  57. Sabu
  58. Chris Adams
  59. Doc Dean
  60. Robbie Brookside
  61. Super Dragon
  62. Mike Modest
  63. Air Paris
  64. James Storm
  65. Evan Karagias
  66. Kwee Wee
  67. EZ Money
  68. El Gato
  69. Cima
  70. Norio Honaga
  71. Daniel Facquir
  72. Sonny Siaki
  73. Jorge Estrada
  74. Johnny Swinger
  75. Scott Putski
  76. Bobbie Roode
  77. Bobby Eaton
  78. Hector Guerrero
  79. The Armstrongs
  80. Barry Horowitz
  81. Madusa
  82. Jacquelin
  83. Luna Vachon
  84. Sonny Onoo
  85. Daffney
  86. Sunny
  87. Violent J
  88. Wolfie D
  89. JC Ice
  90. Mike Sanders
  91. Jet Jaguar
  92. Judo Suwa
  93. Jeremy Lopez
  94. Tommy Rogers
  95. Michael Shane
  96. Paul London
  97. Bobby Walker
  98. Prince Iaukea/Cheetah Kid
  99. Ed Ferrara
TopicThe thought of probably spending $18k a year to live on my own seems crazy
STEROLIZER
04/21/24 2:47:35 PM
#18
18k isnt a lot of money in the long run. Thats like half your pay from a minimum wage job
TopicYour reaction: Fandom's new rules now apply to real life.
STEROLIZER
04/21/24 1:47:57 PM
#12
Wouldnt affect any of us really. Regular everyday average joes dont go through life violently harassing folks they feel
voted differently than they do, while simultaneously sexually harassing folks they deem attractive.

Honestly this is why Fandom probably instituted these rules. To normalize the vibe and virtue of this place a bit more, and get in on par with general society so that they can start onboarding new users from the social media crowd.
TopicWCW's cruiserweight division was legitimate..
STEROLIZER
04/21/24 12:56:35 PM
#81
This was the initial tournament that began the cruiserweight division. WCW kept referencing a fictional tournament in Japan taking place to crown the first champ, when in reality it was just Ohtani rematching Benoit from the Super Juniors tournament.

Ohtani won, was granted the belt, then lost it to Malenko on worldwide in what was a 6 minute match about a week later then never showed up on WCW Television ever again.

WCW stuck with the whole tournament angle, so I guess technically this is what they are referencing, considering in the bout that debuted the cruiser title Benoit put his Super Juniors title on the win as well.
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/1/1cb0d85f.jpg
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/a/a89e508a.jpg
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/a/a192522d.jpg

  • Black Tiger II is Eddie Guerrero
  • Wild Pegasus is Chris Benoit
TopicWCW's cruiserweight division was legitimate..
STEROLIZER
04/21/24 12:46:01 PM
#80
I always dig this match from GAB 95

Alex Wright vs Brian Pillman
https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x18nplj
TopicWCW's cruiserweight division was legitimate..
STEROLIZER
04/21/24 12:40:00 PM
#79
ExtremeLuchador posted...
He lost like 8 PPVs in a row before that.

Bit this is the one that counts
TopicWCW's cruiserweight division was legitimate..
STEROLIZER
04/21/24 12:05:46 PM
#77
ExtremeLuchador posted...
Remember Rey Mysterio losing on every PPV in 1997? Remember X-Pac's reign of terror as Cruiserweight Champion in 1997? 5 minute matches marred with nWo interference? Then they had him lose it to Chris Jericho in 30 seconds at a house show because Bischoff was mad at Kevin Nash or something.

He won this match

https://youtu.be/sqRYKCH8dUc?si=pVDBLVau28waYqqB
TopicWCW's cruiserweight division was legitimate..
STEROLIZER
04/21/24 4:33:54 AM
#75
FortuneCookie posted...
Oh, wow. He got the Ultimate Solution treatment.

Da wat now?
TopicWCW's cruiserweight division was legitimate..
STEROLIZER
04/21/24 4:23:02 AM
#74
https://youtu.be/Iq-HFpaI53o?si=VZBJ_R698K8f_L-X
Topicwhat would you change about your childhood?
STEROLIZER
04/21/24 3:56:46 AM
#30
Would have started fighting in kindergarten instead of 6th grade things got easy once I finally learned to fight back.

But I mean if I had a Time Machine Id just convince my younger self to run away from home to San Francisco or NYC and work to get adopted by a rich family.
TopicWCW's cruiserweight division was legitimate..
STEROLIZER
04/21/24 3:49:45 AM
#73
Daremo posted...
You think Carrey can't canter?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MyPc-1QdzSE

https://youtube.com/shorts/6NeMMgfK-lM?si=lRsPKGA_EC3_jsSH
TopicWCW's cruiserweight division was legitimate..
STEROLIZER
04/21/24 3:39:54 AM
#71
_Valigarmanda_ posted...
I was able to name like 95% without cheating

My favorite CWs were Rey, Dean Malenko, Psychosis, and of course, The Chairman


I always rooted for Alex Wright. We did the dance on the playground everytime we scored a goal/touchdown, hit a homerun, nailed a three pointer, etc
TopicWCW's cruiserweight division was legitimate..
STEROLIZER
04/21/24 2:30:06 AM
#69
absolutebuffoon posted...
I only recognize Spider-Man.

Not Skeletor or John Travolta?
TopicWCW's cruiserweight division was legitimate..
STEROLIZER
04/21/24 12:15:57 AM
#64
StealThisSheen posted...
The crazy thing is that you could put anybody from this list together, and you were guaranteed a good match. Hell, you could include some of the B-tier people, too. It didn't matter, you just got a good match, period.

So long as Prince Iaukea didnt wrestle Evan Karagias
TopicWCW's cruiserweight division was legitimate..
STEROLIZER
04/21/24 12:15:09 AM
#63
StealThisSheen posted...
We're friends now.

Jericho is actually reading the list in the art
TopicWCW's cruiserweight division was legitimate..
STEROLIZER
04/21/24 12:05:21 AM
#58
FortuneCookie posted...
Damien never actually wrestled in WCW with 666 on his head, right?

He did at first. Then someone caught on.
TopicWCW's cruiserweight division was legitimate..
STEROLIZER
04/21/24 12:02:09 AM
#55
  • God Tier: Eddie Guerrero, Chris Jericho, Brian Pillman, Chris Benoit, Jushin Liger, Rey Mysterio
  • A-Tier: Alex Wright, La Parka, Blitzkrieg, Shane Helms, Billy Kidman, Syxx, Disco Inferno, Juvetude Guerrera, Dean Malenko, Ultimo Dragon, Lance Storm, Psicosis
  • B-Tier: Mr JL, Tokyo Magnum, Chavo Guerrero, Jimmy Yang, Kaz Hayashi, Jamie Noble
  • C-Tier: Shannon Moore, Lash LaRoux, Chris Candido, Elix Skipper, Crowbar, Silver King, El Dandy, Los Villanos, Hector Garza, Super Calo, Damien, Ciclope, Lizmark
  • D-Tier: Brad Armstrong, Marty Jannetty, Lenny Lane, Lodi
  • F-Tier: Prince Iaukea, Evan Karagias


TopicWCW's cruiserweight division was legitimate..
STEROLIZER
04/20/24 11:37:10 PM
#52
StealThisSheen posted...
For the longest time, even as a kid, La Parka and Psicosis were my favorites, period. Even when I knew I was supposed to root for Mysterio or whoever, I liked them most.

I think I liked La Parka because of his "Chairman" gimmick, and how much he could move, even as a bigger guy.

https://youtu.be/2ZYwIl7XGJM?si=h6FqFyg2dt15ft-B

TopicWCW's cruiserweight division was legitimate..
STEROLIZER
04/20/24 11:31:39 PM
#51
MICHALECOLE posted...
Rey mysterio

but I just noticed Chris Benoit above him

I am sure Id know plenty if I heard their name

Eddie Guerrero
Board List
Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 12