Lurker > MrDrMan

If the money was the same I would 1000% prefer washing dishes. Dealing with people sucks especially when they have some type of fake moral superiority over you which is all of the time as a server.

I love the game but its nowhere near as hard as people make it out to be. Maybe because Im used to Soulsbourne now the timing came naturally.

I have yet to see a boss or enemy that took more than three tries yet and Im in chapter four.

Game is great but its much easier to cheese in this than in other Soulslike games.

Nami wins the fight. Bulma is more useful and its not even close. She invented the machine that located the Dragon Balls. She invented the Time Machine. She was responsible for items pivotal to the plot. Nami has never been pivotal to the overall universe like Bulma has.

Relative to most GameFAQS mains 1000 isnt a lot. Under 1000 is basically shitposting alt territtory so Id say minimum 1000.

Dreepapult posted...

Other countries just have better food than us in general

At least a lot of the European ones anyway

Some Asian countries too like Japan

Nah. Other countries dont have the variety America does.

Guide posted...

I'd say that American food exists. Even Italy is a conglomeration of formerly separate cultures, they're just a lot older. But BBQ is a funny thing in Italy. I went in July, BBQ came up, I ask, "What is Italian style BBQ?" I'm told "Italian BBQ is going to Austria"

And literally that's what we did. Took a whole trip to Austria for one meal with relatives. Great stuff, though. Just a huge variety of sausages and cuts and grilling cheeses.

Most of the time American food just isnt called American food. For example Cajun style food. Gumbo, Dirty Rice, Jambalaya, red beans and rice, all that shit is fire. Soul food is fire. KC style BBQ. Buffalo wings. I could go on.

Theres a lot of great food that is American but it usually categorized as the region it was created instead of just American.

Ruvan22 posted...

So I'm brand new to this thread - two questions
A) Why did you bring up conceal carry and millions of guns already on the street?
B) Which post had a suggestion that "solves the issue"?

A) Many initial arguments were that the right to carry as it currently stands and access to guns are what caused this. I agree that we should limit access to guns but I was pointing out what I see as flaws in that argument. Even if we limited ability to carry people can still hide(conceal) their weapons. Even if we outright banned anyone from buying another gun there are still hundreds of millions of guns out there.

Not along ago we couldnt get half the country to simply wear a mask. Now we are suggesting because of the law they will give up their protection that they deem essential? I just dont see it. The same study that estimated 450 million guns produced since 1899 found 44% of gun owners to be Republican and around 20% to be Democrat. These are people that wear come and take out guns merch. They wont give them up so why would we effectively disarm ourselves against them? I lean heavily towards Democrat but you wouldnt walk into a lions den without a gun so why are we suggesting that? You may stop a handful of scenarios like this get allow more scenarios like the 23 Latinos shot by some crazy racist fuck.

Last Im on mobile so I dont want to go through all the posts. Nobody outright said their idea would solve the issue but the way people came down on Gleason, to me, it was implied. I assumed people would not throw stones from glass houses but thats just my opinion. I didnt present a rock solid argument either so its all good.

Ill say I apologize for being hostile recently. I just really dont like the way a lot of discussion takes place on here. From now on I just will not engage with the negativity. Appreciate you keeping the question civil.

tb333 posted...

How many accounts do you have? Picking up from when BGleason22 got purgatoried?

More gaslighting.

Nintendo_System posted...

Challenge accepted.

You're a douchebag.

More name calling.

Wow Im shocked.

Sandalorn posted...

"Nobody on this site is capable of physically and intellectually beating me!! I am ALPHA!"

LOL. Just stop man. Go outside, touch grass and THEN maybe come back and act like someone over 12 when having people disagree with your opinions. Grow up and deal with differing opinions.

Shut the hell up. All you guys do is bash people. Get outta here with this differing opinions crap. You all started the name calling. Then you back down like the coward you are when challenged and claim victim.

IfGodCouldDie posted...

Are you forgetting the part where you tried to tell people to shut the fuck up first?

I told one dude that told me to close my account to shut up. Can yall please make a point without deliberately lying? I challenge anyone here to do so.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


You are probably 40 years old posting these lame ass insults. Think about that.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


Right. Im under 13 posting on a 14 year old account. Makes sense.

Cemith posted...

Now you're free to read that a different way, but to everyone except you, this just screams "We can't fix it so let's not pass laws because it won't change anything."

This is why laws need to be passed and 2A be amended, These two statements are incongruent. One reads like laws are pointless, while you're also for laws that make it harder? No wonder you're so confident in your "point". It's so nebulous you can claim it means anything you want it to.

You are beyond disingenuous. I brought up valid points people can still conceal weapons. I brought up points that theres still hundreds of millions on the streets this does nothing to resolve.

Im not saying we should do nothing. Im saying you all should stop bullying Gleason like you actually solved the issue. Everyone came down on him so hard yet you dont have the solution yourself. Thats lame.

If you disagree then just make your point but as Ive said the constant name calling and bullying is so fucking lame. The majority of people here are not capable of simply making their point without it. People are claiming Im 13. Like really? None of that is necessary.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


Maybe you guys should stop trying to bully people that you arent intellectually or physically capable of.

Cemith posted...

The difference between you and I is simple. I think things should be done and understand it will take time. You think because it won't happen instantly, we should do nothing.

You are a sad man.

When did I say we should do nothing?

Youre putting words in my mouth because your argument is weak. Thats all you guys have is name calling, gaslighting and mob mentality. There are no valid points here.

Sandalorn posted...

LOL...You literally went to internet tough guy.

No? Im just not gonna let you guys bully me. I didnt threaten anyone.

Sandalorn posted...

And then shitting on any law or restriction that does just that. Do you seriously think you are fooling anyone?

I literally said guns should be harder to carry. When did I shit on anyone?

Pointing out that people can still conceal carry isnt shitting on anyone. Its bringing up a valid point. You guys are the ones name calling not me.

greenjeans posted...

I think we all agree on a "you first"

If anyone here can make me then feel free. Otherwise I really dont care.

SaikyoStyle posted...

You should close your account.

And you should shut the fuck up.

Cemith posted...

Meanwhile denouncing everyone as being nave for things that won't fix it instantaneously?

Yeah, whatever helps you sleep at night, champ.

Because you guys are being tools about it as per usual. You present this argument with obvious, glaring holes then sit here and collectively bash everyone that simply points that out.

Its lame.

Yall are delusional. I literally have said multiple times guns should be harder to get.

Typical CE gaslighting though.

Cemith posted...

Yeah I don't see MrDrLad being a proponent of granular change. It would be too difficult, since, you know, there's already too many guns

Sorry your proposition of Hey at least you wont get shot 50 years from now. doesnt really move the needle for me.

Youre proposing a solution that you admit does nothing to solve the issue right now while acting like everyone should care right now. Its nonsensical. And while doing it being condescending as if you did something. This is no better than thoughts and prayers. Propose something that will actually fix the issue or get off your high horse.

Giant_Aspirin posted...

none of us expect America's gun culture to change overnight with the passage of a law or two. this is a change we need to gradually implement over multiple generations. and doing things like relaxing gun restrictions and making it easier or more convenient to access them is the wrong direction.

thronedfire2 posted...

the reality is that unless something is actually done now there will ALWAYS be too many guns to do anything

Ive already agreed limiting access to guns is needed. I just dont think changing the law is anywhere near enough to stop this issue. People dont care about the law unless they think theyll get caught.

Carljank posted...

Reminder that MrDrMan was moderated for bigotry recently when he cries about my behavior.

Here you go again lying/name calling because you cant make an argument.

Giant_Aspirin posted...

but the laws that allow people to carry in public contribute to dumb bullshit like this. throwing up your hands and declaring "it's too late, there's nothing we can do" is so intellectually lazy.

"it was illegal anyway and people still did it" -- I can't believe people still toss this around with any sincerity. yeah man, I guess you're right. since some people break laws anyway we should just do away with them entirely! *rolls eyes*

Intellectually lazy is thinking that a simple law change is going to stop people from just carrying concealed. You did not at all address the fact that I said people estimate anywhere from 300-450 million guns to be in circulation in the US. How does your allow address that in any way? These guns are already out there.

We couldnt even get half the country to wear masks. The solution has to be based in reality.

Giant_Aspirin posted...

which is why we have laws. again, this is not the grand slam argument winner you seem to think it is.

Neither is this. Its against the law to shoot someone yet here we are. Laws wont change the fact that 465 million guns have been produced for the US since 1900.40% of people own or live in a house with access to a gun.

Im all for making it harder but it is delusional thinking to believe these people will ever give their guns up. It wont happen. The only option is to make it harder to obtain but even then there will be a black market.

Carljank posted...

Well no I don't tend to waste my time with people such as yourself who purposefully argue in bad faith. So you are correct that conversations with YOU in particular as well as your ilk is not appealing to me in any way.

The irony of you saying someone argues in bad faith is hilarious. You spend more time insulting than ever bringing up good points. If you disagree then please prove me wrong and attempt to make your point without doing so. I highly doubt you can.

Shadow_Don posted...

Wait I thought you said people shouldn't be punished for cowardice?

Also, people with body armor can still be killed. Where do you draw the line at when it becomes a criminal liability to not act?

In all fairness it actually is a tough question. The guy I was talking to last night was making a lot better faith arguments than the other clown.

Probably the wildest thing I saw were people saying that its ok because people embellish their resume and skill set all the time. That excuse just does not fly at all with other professions if people die when you fail to do your job.

One is singular, one refers to a group. One man without a vest should not be. An entire police squad though with gear? Yes. Entirely different scenarios.

I draw the line at were you in a scenario that most reasonable people would assume was advantageous to you.

andel posted...

how do you feel about the uvalde cops @MrDrMan ?

idk how anyone can defene blatant cowardice like this

Uvalde cops had whole teams geared out and didnt act. That is cowardice and they should be punished in some way. I see no reason for them not to have acted.

One man can not be held responsible for an event like this though unless he is the shooter. Thats not rational. Nobody should ever be obligated to give their life for another. Thats why the people that do are seen as heroes.

Shadow_Don posted...

Imagine taking a victory lap and dancing on the graves of dead kids because you said stupid shit on a message board and people made fun of you for that.

Please shut the fuck up with this disingenuous bullshit. RIP to those kids. It was a tragic event all the way around. That didnt make this witch hunt justified.

Youre wrong and deserve to be called out. The name calling in here is unacceptable so really all of you that had a part in that can fuck off.

Next time you all want to call people trolls, cop apologists, coward, bootlickers consider maybe for one second that you might just be wrong.

Cemith posted...

Bro go home, this is just sad.

No whats sad is you clowns trying to bully people for over 300 posts while being dead fucking wrong.

An unbiased party has spoken. You are wrong. You all can shut the hell up now.

Wow who would have guessed CE keyboard warriors would be wrong?

Turns out actual rational people seem to think differently. Please carry on. The court has spoken. Say whatever you guys want in this lame ass echo chamber.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


I dont care in the sense that no amount of people here telling me to shut up or ridicule will get me to stop.

Ill stop when I choose to. CE is unhinged. I dont even take this seriously.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


The guy that went in and shot 18 people is the one who got people killed. How some of you dont understand this is beyond me. Had that cop called into work that day 18 people would still be dead.

This is exactly why I say this argument is not based in logic.

A_Good_Boy posted...

"You shouldn't use kids in a topic directly related to kids" sure is quite the take.

If you have to use emotion to make your point then youve lost. Any good argument should be based in logic. You wouldnt understand though.

RuneterranSnap posted...

Yeah based on what I've seen I have zero interest associating with you.

Blah blah. This isnt real life. I dont care who Im associated with.

ooger posted...

What was your old account?

Its been so long I dont even remember. It was at least 15 years ago.

Carljank posted...

Imagine whipping out a regular user alt because you got so spanked. Fuck off Tenlaar/DrMelty

Using an alt would imply I care what anyone thinks enough to switch accounts. I dont.

My only other account was banned before I even created this one. I have no alts. Nice try though.

RuneterranSnap posted...

Man I'm nowhere near a blue shielder. What he did was awful. But that doesn't change that putting him in prison will not serve anyone. I don't want prison time that doesn't serve society.

Take him out of service, and block him from it permanently. Fine him if you feel that's necessary. But unless prison is actively making someone's life safer, I don't support it.

Not even worth reasoning with these people. I absolutely hate cops and Trump. Doesnt mean I lack common sense.

They have no argument other than name calling and trying to use kids as a defense.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


You posted literally 30 seconds after me. Maybe if yall could get your panties outta bunch for even a single minute I would.

I dont care. This is a message board. If you have an issue with people posting when they want then go somewhere else. Not my issue.

There is an ignore/block function. If anyone doesnt want to see my posts that bad then feel free. I wont lose a lick of sleep over it.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


That was yesterday for one and secondly I can change my mind. I dont give a shit what anyone here says about it. That should be obvious by now. Oh no I said I wouldnt post and did! Grow up.

Also exaggerate more please.

Last thing because Im not debating clowns today is that using childrens deaths to push your shitty narrative is beyond lame.

Stop trying to pull on heartstrings. Everyone feels bad without you guys trying to pull that crap.

I think its hilarious that people that cant handle their cool in an online debate want to speak about composure in high pressure scenarios.

Clowns cant even keep their cool on an online message board.

Also hilarious to me how quickly people resort to name calling because their argument simply sucks.

au_gold posted...

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/0/3/1/AAZ5w5AAEm7f.jpg

Ok I was down until this. Ill pass.

GATTJT posted...

You said you were going to leave, at least be a man of your word.

Please stop virtue signaling.

YourBestFrenemy posted...

Remember when you said "Last post in here for me."?
Yep, that was super great, (for the 10 minutes it actually lasted).

Look at this coward trying to chime in now that Im done!

Yes bank to bank transfers are possible as well as splitting checks.

ooger posted...

Don't let the door hit you on the way out.

Oh fuck off.

Im off work though so Im done going back and forth.

Last post in here for me.

ButteryMales posted...

I didn't call you stupid. I said what you said was stupid which it is.

Like Jesus Christ you're implying you want to go shoot up a school out of spite.

Now THIS is stupid.