Lurker > MachineJaipur

Started going to church recently.

Every Sunday.

People who say this was merely a diversity pick are severely disrespecting Halle Bailey's immense talent. She didn't get the role because of the color of her skin.

This is the second worst take in this topic.

I wonder if having an active moderation is what's causing the 403 when uploading an image.

I started watching porn at 13, so 18*365*~100=394,200

Yes but it will be weird as all hell because she is literally a pedophiles dream come true. She's looks like a legal aged child.

How would she working in the porn industry catch anyone?

Is it? Do you think it would be ok for this girl to work in the porn industry?

Should be allowed to display affection in the open, like kissing her partner?

I have it on good authority that it's not gay when it's in a 3-way.

Whatever the USA is, I dont follow sports

dying democracy that will soon be a theocratic dictatorship

yeah, rules like "don't invade other countries and commit war crimes"

Russian President Vladimir Putin says that since the beginning of the war in Ukraine, the Russian Federation has lost nothing.
Source: Russian propaganda agency RIA Novosti, citing Putin's speech at the plenary session of the Eastern Economic Forum in Vladivostok on 7 September
Quote from Putin: "I am sure that the Russian Federation has lost nothing since 24 February, but the main achievement is the strengthening of our sovereignty.
Russia is a sovereign state, and we will always protect our national interests by pursuing an independent policy."
Details: The president of the aggressor country also added that Russia "will entirely fulfil its duty to protect the Donbas", and "will become stronger externally and internally."
In addition, Putin is confident that it is impossible to isolate Russia, since "the country, using its natural competitive advantages, will continue to increase its transport potential, expand the network of roads and railways, build new approaches to sea terminals and increase their capacity."
He insists that Russia is quite capable of providing itself with natural resources.
According to Putin, the Far Eastern Federal District plays a significant role in this, being the most important supplier of oil, natural gas, coal, metals, lumber and aquatic bioresources to both the domestic market and foreign partners.
At the same time, Putin believes that the West throws everything into the furnace "in the notorious name of unity."
Quote from Putin: "The achieved level of industrial development in Europe, the quality of people's lives, socio-economic stability all of this is thrown into the sanctions furnace, spent on instructions from Washington in the name of the notorious Euro-Atlantic unity, and sacrificed to preserve the dictatorship of the United States in world affairs."
Details: According to the president of the aggressor country, in the spring, many foreign corporations announced their withdrawal from Russia, and today "one by one, jobs and production facilities in Europe itself are being closed."
Putin is sure that one of the reasons for this is "the severance of business ties with Russia," saying that "EU authorities deprive European enterprises of energy resources, raw materials, and sales markets."
He also accused the United States of undermining the foundations of the global economic order. And he added that "the West seeks to preserve the world order from which it benefits, according to the rules it invented."
For reference: The Eastern Economic Forum is being held on 5-8 September, at the campus of the Far Eastern Federal University on Russky Island in Vladivostok.

As if overturning Roe didn't get the majority of moderates to got blue, this certainly would.

since when has fairness to everyone been a prerequisite for legislation to pass?

in essence, they can't do s***. they already handed this power to the executive by law.

Spider-Face
Spider-Face
shoots his foot and loses the race
Has foresight?
No, not that
He is
Just a t***
Look out!
There goes the Spider-Face

low. loan forgiveness does not create inflation, it literally just removes a federal government asset (that is, on average, not yielding much of anything in net returns after you factor for processing costs) off their books.

so it is quite difficult to even find a plaintiff, and existing legislation created the path the biden admin took to enact this

what exactly do you not understand

they want people to hurt, their message doesn't work if people aren't hurting

A number of Republican legislators may bring a legal challenge against President Joe Biden's historic announcement last week that he'd forgive the student debt of tens of millions of Americans.
Although no lawsuit has been brought yet, GOP attorneys general from states such as Arizona, Missouri and Texas, as well as Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, and those connected to conservative think tank the Heritage Foundation, are considering their options when it comes to trying to block loan forgiveness, according to reporting by The Washington Post.
"The uncertainty for borrowers in the meantime is, I'm afraid, considerable," said Laurence Tribe, a Harvard law professor.
Biden said last week that most federal student loan borrowers will be eligible for some forgiveness: up to $10,000 if they didn't receive a Pell Grant, which is a type of aid available to low-income undergraduate students, and up to $20,000 if they did.
The White House, along with its announcement, released a 25-page memo by the U.S. Department of Justice making the case that debt cancellation is "appropriate" under the Heroes Act of 2003, which grants the president broad power to revise student loan programs. That law was passed shortly after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks and permitted the executive branch to forgive student loans during national emergencies. The Trump administration declared the Covid-19 pandemic a national emergency in March 2020.
Those trying to block the forgiveness will likely argue that the Heroes Act of 2003 doesn't give the president the power to forgive student debt in the broad way he is trying to, said higher education expert Mark Kantrowitz.
The issue could make its way to the Supreme Court.
The news of a possible challenge from the right is unsurprising. Even before Biden rolled out his plan, some Republicans worked to stop an effort by the president to cancel the debt in national emergencies. Critics of student loan forgiveness say the policy is unfair to Americans who didn't attend college, as well as to those who paid off their student loans already or never borrowed in the first place.
The first obstacle to those hoping to bring a legal challenge against Biden's plan will be finding a suitable plaintiff, Tribe said. It'll likely have to be someone who can make the case that student loan forgiveness causes them "personal injury," and that might not be easy.
"Such injury is needed to establish what courts call 'standing,'" Tribe said. "No individual or business or state is demonstrably injured the way private lenders would have been if, for instance, their loans to students had been canceled."
'Be cautiously optimistic'
The news that a challenger to loan forgiveness could come forward is sure to make anxious the tens of millions of Americans who've been reimagining their lives with less student debt since the president's announcement.
The U.S. Department of Education has said its application for loan cancellation will be available by or before October, and Kantrowitz said borrowers should not change their plans for now.
"Borrowers should apply for forgiveness and be cautiously optimistic," he said.
Neither the White House nor the Education Department immediately responded to a request for comment.

Wouldnt even call them that they are worst, they are trying to create the Fourth Reich.

Russia is pulling all of its fighter jets out of Crimea in an apparent response to recent explosions at Russian military outposts in the region, a secret NATO report seen by Insider said.
Russia has already moved ten aircraft six Su-35S and four MiG-31BM jets out of Crimea and into Russia and is set to continue until all fighter jets are removed, the report, which was dated August 22, said.
The first ten jets were moved from Belbek airfield in Crimea to Kushchevskaya and Marinovka, two regions in Russia, the report said.
"Russia has dispersed 10x fighter aircraft from Crimea to other airfields in mainland Russia to likely prevent further losses from Ukrainian attacks," the report said.
The report was referring to a series of apparent attacks in Crimea, the Ukrainian region that Russia illegally annexed in 2014. Ukraine has not claimed responsibility for the explosions, though Ukrainian officials have suggested that it was involved.
Multiple explosions hit Saki airbase and Russia's navy headquarters in Sevastopol, and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has made it clear that his ultimate goal is to retake occupied Crimea.
As Insider previously reported, moving these assets farther from the front lines could make it harder for Russia to use them in operations in Ukraine.
Belbek airfield, which is near Sevastopol, is "Russia's primary airfield providing support in southern Ukraine and the Black Sea," the NATO report said.
The report noted that at the time of its publication, 32 Russian fighter jets remained in Belbek airfield: They were mostly the Su-27 Flanker J fighter jets, but there were also a small number of SU-35Ss and MiG-31BMs.
These aircraft are "likely insufficient" to maintain the same level of air support in the region, the report said.
Russia has also increased the number of its tactical surface-to-air missiles in Crimea to defend against attacks by Ukrainian unmanned aerial vehicles, or drones, the report said.
"Ukrainian UAVs are hard for Russia to target due to poor IADS (Integrated Air Defense System) C2, likely a weakness across the full spectrum of Russia's armed forces' efforts in the Ukraine conflict," the report said.