Lurker > MachineJaipur

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

Causally look away seems to be the best option for that

Unless you feel staring is continuing on as normal

R1masher posted...

Is she shorn?

The bush is so thick, George W Bush changes his last name

Tyranthraxus posted...

You mean like in public?

Well yeah.

If it's your GF walking nude in front of you at home obviously you're going to have a different reaction than some random lady.

Nukazie posted...

would be rude not to stare

So if you walked nude through a room and nobody stared, you'd feel that was rude?

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

Look, I was just trying to make a rhyme on the spot

They seem entirely unperturbed to be walking around nude as a dude at nudist beach so they're not even trying to cover up

Her head is waist height on him, just saying

RIP tc

hopefully we'll see him again some day

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/1/0/1/AAecKNAAC8_V.jpg

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/1/0/2/AAecKNAAC8_W.jpg

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/1/0/3/AAecKNAAC8_X.jpg

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/1/0/4/AAecKNAAC8_Y.jpg

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/1/0/5/AAecKNAAC8_Z.jpg

Fuck, they have plans

Hop103 posted...

No thanks, the bathroom is not meant to be a communal experience.

I misread that as a communist experience at first lmao

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/0/6/6/AAecKNAAC8-y.jpg

Could you?

Rathinor posted...

How many of these people supported 1/6?

The bigger question is how many think 1/6 was a bunch of Antifa plants but also subsequently cheered when Trump said he'd pardon those involved in 1/6

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/1/7/2/AAecKNAAC8w0.jpg

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/1/7/3/AAecKNAAC8w1.jpg

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/1/7/4/AAecKNAAC8w2.jpg

This will end well

You have the world's biggest penis, but it makes walking extremely difficult, the act of fucking impossible, and pissing is difficult as well.

Would you get a reduction or stay a virgin?

Do you notice?

Umbreon posted...

Thank you for reminding me that Owens would totally be fine with Hitler so long as he only did the shit he did in Germany.

https://youtu.be/PVH0gZO5lq0?t=126

Reminds me of this

https://ottawacitizen.com/news/local-news/freedom-convoy-leader-says-he-just-wants-to-go-home-after-spending-night-in-jail

Freedom Convoy leader Chris Barber says his organizing days are over and he just wants to go home to his farm in Swift Current, Sask., after being arrested and jailed on charges of mischief and obstruct police.

Barber, 46, spent a night in the notorious Ottawa police cell block and was granted bail Friday night on conditions that he leave town within 24 hours and go home and never support the protest again.
Barber, who owns a trucking company, agreed with the bail conditions that he can no longer support the protest verbally, on TV or online. Barber, who employs four other truck drivers, put up a $100,000 bond to secure his bail.
His conditions require him to live at home until his case winds through the criminal justice system.
While hes forbidden from supporting the protest, hes allowed to cover the cost of fuel for other truckers to travel back west with him. He made the offer after hearing that crowd-funding money didnt get into the hands of fellow truckers.
Barbers trucking company does business in the Prairies and into the United States.
Barber is charged with mischief, counselling to commit the offence of disobey court order and counselling to commit the offence of obstruct police.
If the case goes to trial, Ottawas Crown Attorney Office is expected to seek a prison term of more than two years for tormenting the city in a criminal manner and for inciting protesters to break the law.
Defence lawyer Diane Magas won bail for Barber. She noted Barber could not possibly be responsible for the actions of others and, in the face of TikTok videos, the defence lawyer questioned if the online videos were filmed before or after the court injunction.
Ottawa Crown Attorney Moiz Karimjee said the impact of the protest had been significant and called homicide detective Chris Benson to testify about it.
In the end, the judge concluded that Barber who doesnt have a criminal record posed no substantial threat to the public and granted the convoy leader bail.
The judge said she learned nothing from the officers testimony that she hadnt already read in the newspaper.
I dont know what else Im supposed to be learning here? Ontario Court Justice Julie Bourgeois said at the hours-long bail hearing.
No publication ban was requested.
Barber must check in with Benson by phone as part of his bail conditions, and he is forbidden from communicating with other convoy leaders.
According to Barbers bail conditions, hes allowed only to return to Ottawa for meetings with his lawyer or for court hearings.
He was ordered to not have any contact outside of legal proceedings with fellow organizers Tamara Lich, Daniel Bulford or Patrick King.
Lich, another notable protest organizer, was also arrested on Thursday night. Her bail hearing is scheduled for Saturday morning.

Bulford and King were arrested on Friday.

"My actions had consequences? Inconceivable"

monkmith posted...

...canada's got oil...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SwSle66O5sU

We can't let the Americans know

All i can think of is this

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/7/3/7/AAA4VzAAC6dZ.jpg

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/1/7/5/AAecKNAAC8hP.jpg

Idk who Justin Trudeau Castro is

JScriv posted...

But there's clearly a Gadsden flag being flown right next it which wouldn't make any sense since those two ideologies completely contradict one another.

Are you saying I'm supposed to read and understand ideologies before supporting them?

Solid Snake07 posted...

I didn't say you're a communist, I said you're an apologist to historic hate symbols when it suits you

Communism never represented hate outright though.

Nazism, though, did.

Don't mix Western ideology vs Communism with the hammer and sickle being a hate symbol.

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/politics/article-trudeau-accuses-conservatives-of-standing-with-people-who-wave/

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau was cautioned against using inflammatory language by the Speaker of the House of Commons on Wednesday after he told Conservative MP Melissa Lantsman, who is Jewish, that her party stands with people who wave swastikas.
Mr. Trudeau made the comment during Question Period on Wednesday amid a heated debate over the countrys single remaining blockade in Ottawa and the governments imposition of the never-before-used Emergencies Act.
Ms. Lantsman, the MP for Thornhill, north of Toronto, told the House that Mr. Trudeau fans the flames of an unjustified national emergency and asked, When did the Prime Minister lose his way?
He responded by saying, Conservative Party members can stand with people who wave swastikas. They can stand with people who wave the Confederate flag.
We will choose to stand with Canadians who deserve to be able to get to their jobs, to be able to get their lives back. These illegal protests need to stop and they will.
The comments prompted an uproar in the House of Commons, with some MPs calling for Mr. Trudeau to apologize. The Prime Ministers statement earned him a direct rebuke from Speaker Anthony Rota.
I just want to remind the honourable members, including the Right Honourable Prime Minister, to use words that are not inflammatory in the House, he said.
Mr. Trudeau did not withdraw the comment.
Mr. Trudeau and his caucus have criticized the Conservatives throughout the blockade in Ottawa for supporting the antigovernment protests against pandemic mandates and restrictions.
Some of the people protesting on Parliament Hill have carried flags and signs featuring swastikas and yellow stars of David. And some of the opponents of the vaccination mandates at the blockades have likened them to the persecution of Jews by the Nazis.

Ms. Lantsman is a descendant of Holocaust survivors and called Mr. Trudeaus comments unbecoming as a Prime Minister.
Later on Wednesday, Conservative MP Dane Lloyd twice used his time in Question Period to ask Mr. Trudeau to retract his comment and apologize. In both cases, Mr. Trudeau did not.
Ms. Lantsman then rose on a point of order to request an apology, but the Prime Minister had left the House of Commons.
I am a strong Jewish woman and a member of this House and the descendant of Holocaust survivors, she said. I have never been made to feel less except for today when the Prime Minister accused me of standing with swastikas. I think he owes me an apology. Id like an apology.
The Globe and Mail asked Mr. Trudeaus office if he would apologize to Ms. Lantsman. In response, a spokesperson directed The Globe to comments from Families Minister Karina Gould.
Ms. Gould is also Jewish and a descendant of Holocaust survivors, and responded to the point of order by calling on everyone to take a step back. She also criticized Conservatives for taking pictures with protesters who want to overthrow the government.
We must assure that no one in this House is standing with those who support white supremacy, who support Nazi views, who look to contribute and enable racist views, Ms. Gould said. And I would call on the members opposite not to stand with those who are sharing those views.
On Jan. 29, Conservative MP Michael Cooper did a TV interview, where a protester could be seen behind him carrying a flag with a swastika. He later said he wasnt connected to the protester and said anyone using the symbol should be eternally ashamed.
At the time, Ms. Lantsman wrote on Twitter, its possible to respect the right to protest even if you disagree while condemning the reprehensible symbols used by some.
Last week, Liberal MP Jol Lightbound broke with the government on its pandemic policies and said he was concerned by his partys divisive rhetoric. During the past election campaign, he said, a decision was made to wedge, to divide and to stigmatize.

Shots have been fired

WilliamPorygon posted...

The issue with using We is that it is not the community that baptizes a person, rather, it is Christ, and Him alone, who presides at all of the sacraments, and so it is Christ Jesus who baptizes, Olmsted wrote in a message posted to the Diocese of Phoenix website.

WilliamPorygon posted...

The congregation affirms that baptisms administered with modified formulas are invalid, including: We baptize you in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, the Vatican announced.

Couldn't it be we though by their logic?

The holy trinity is the Father, the Son and the Holy Ghost. sounds like a we to me.