Lurker > Aaantlion

Melon_Master posted...

jedirood posted...

He still going with this?

Yes, he is.. Zeus is obsessively harassing the person he claims is harassing him. Despite ClarkDuke, being nothing but civil with Zeus.

You mean the guy who's been following me around, stalking me, attacking me, criticizing me, etc, who I can't recall even once starting a conversation with let alone attacking is supposedly the one being harassed? Even after I added him to my ignore list and he's still going at me, I'm supposedly the one "harassing him"?



Shitposts like that are why I don't take any of your claims seriously and why I decided to take you up on your advice by blocking you.

Kana posted...

zeus i never once said that the clark account isn't about me. i have every reason to believe that it is, all i said is that it hasn't been used to actively troll me as of yet. stop twisting my words, and also get off this shit.

And likewise I have even more reason to believe that it's about me, given the start date, content, and serial harassment.

argonautweakend posted...

Ziggi doesnt even have to use those accounts to troll ico or kana specifically. the fact they exist does enough, you could have a post about baseball but the username is trolling in and of itself.

By that logic, you should understand exactly how that account is trolling me before even including the fact that he's engaged in a campaign of harassment against me. Of course, instead of using logic whenever something impacts me negatively you use mental gymnastics -- and for rather obvious reason, given that you've confessed on numerous occasion to disliking me.
---

(\/)(\/)|-|

I liked Hey Arnold, it was a good cartoon, but Courage is better and I liked it more.
---

(\/)(\/)|-|

Full Throttle posted...

Do you think a jury should have a split of whites and minorities in murder cases?

As it is, minorities are already OVER-represented on that jury. Blacks make up 13% of the population, yet they comprised 16% of the jury >_> Plus the race of the defendant wasn't even represented, which -- by your logic -- works against him yet he won anyway.

PK_Spam posted...

Well, I mean, the guy didn't do ANYTHING wrong and got shot anyway. I would be really upset and say things like that if my child got shot

Based on what? Nothing? Ok.

PK_Spam posted...

aHappySacka posted...

I'm pretty sure there was more to this story but I can't say for sure.

You're right.

He told the man he had a gun and a license to carry it. He went for his wallet and got shot 7 times with a preschooler and his girlfriend in the car.

The officer was a fucking idiot and should've gone to jail and I HOPE there's a riot about it soon because this nonsense keeps happening

Clearly there was more to the story than your allegations, since a jury of 12 found him not guilty.
---

(\/)(\/)|-|

Kyuubi4269 posted...

Zeus posted...

Not how it works. Not to mention that it's unlikely any court would bother even hearing the case given that she had no damages and it's something relatively routine.

Emotional damages, and it's not routine to evict people for wearing light clothes in summer.

lol, just lol. That's not how emotional damages works. If it was, I could sue Erik for all he's worth-- which, admittedly, ain't much.

OneTimeBen posted...

None of the links point to a real story. You all need to check yourself. This is most likely bs.

Because apparently Ducky hacked the Daily Mail and posted images on their server?
---

(\/)(\/)|-|

Jen0125 posted...

That's why I never bought a Bernie bumper sticker. I don't need some asshole keying my car.

Pretty much how I've always seen it. Otherwise I would have put a Bernie sticker -- of a different sort, mind you -- on my car.

And in general:

---

(\/)(\/)|-|

Questionmarktarius posted...

Isn't that the guy who just got shot?

I would assume no, since he's a senator.
---

(\/)(\/)|-|

How big will the affected area be? If it's localized, I could throw stuff out the window and still have it be safe >_>

Also, what happens if a poster has those tiny homes? Because couldn't they just move the whole thing to safety?
---

(\/)(\/)|-|

GameReviews posted...

1. She was a no name actress when they cast her. I'm not aware of any notable character before Wonder Woman that she's played?

She starred in THREE Fast & Furious films and had a flashback cameo in Furious 7 -- a film which did 1.5b at the box office. (How much was Wonder Woman done again?) She was also in Date Night (over $150m box office) and Knight & Day (over $250m box office).

Meanwhile you're trying to treat like her like Brandon Routh, an ACTUAL unknown who hadn't been in any major film before Superman Returns and a name so unknown that you were thinking, "Who?", when you heard the name.

GameReviews posted...

3. See the beginning of this post. Men build muscle EASIER than women, but no, it's not easy for a man to become big or musclar.

Except for the fact that it IS easy for men to build a basic level of musculature where they have pronounced arms, etc, where a woman trying to get that same effect has to put in effort comparable to a man with very highly defined muscles and she'd likely need "supplements" to get much further than that.
---

(\/)(\/)|-|

Kind of prank that doesn't deserve a headline.
---

(\/)(\/)|-|

GameReviews posted...

If they were going to go with a no name actress like they did with Gadot

>Plays major roles in multiple blockbusters
>Gets called no-name actress

roflmao, lazy trolling.

AllstarSniper32 posted...

GameReviews posted...

I still don't know why they chose this woman to be Wonder Woman, she's a freaking stick figure and Wonder Woman is supposed to be an Amazon.

GameReviews posted...

they should have made her put on some muscle for the role.

I still have yet to see anyone post pics of Wonder Woman in multiple versions of comics where she's super muscly.

I don't get it either, but GR has been doing this silly schtick for a while. I half think I've only seen him post here in regards to Wonder Woman and his claims don't have any real basis. Not in the comics, not in portrayal of Amazons in the media (the Amazons on Xena were pretty scrawny, for instance), etc.



Doctor Foxx posted...

GameReviews posted...

You don't think it's the same way for men?

It isn't. Biologically. No one said that it was easy to get bulky and muscular for men. It just does not happen for women like that without crazy supplements and/or steroids. Bulking requires testosterone and women do not produce enough naturally to build muscle like that.

https://www.issaonline.edu/blog/index.cfm/2016/ladies-lifting-heavy-wont-make-you-bulk-up

http://www.healthguidance.org/entry/859/1/Can-Women-Build-Big-Muscles-Why-Women-Cant-Build-Big-Muscles-Easily.html

Yes, men are naturally endowed with the genetics to easily build muscle which is why they have an easier time of it.
---

(\/)(\/)|-|

Chelsea has been more adamant about not pursuing politics in the past, so even the CNN editorial is presumptive.
---

(\/)(\/)|-|

WastelandCowboy posted...

In all due respect, he wrote that in 1972. A person's views can change in 40+ years.

Be that as it may, this is the same Bernie Sanders who in 2016 was talking about needing to get blacks off street corners. He has a history with words that would make Joe Biden blush.
---

(\/)(\/)|-|

aHappySacka posted...

So black workers are automatically slaves, got it.

This, pretty much. As far as fake controversies go, this one is remarkably lazy and shows how awful the subculture is.
---

(\/)(\/)|-|

keyblader1985 posted...

These places are so dang expensive. Just a frappuccino and slice of lemon cake cost eight dollars.

I don't like to just sit in a store without ordering anything, but damn.

You don't have to. They usually have outdoor seating plus the wifi network can extend as far as your car.
---

(\/)(\/)|-|

ShadowBoyZX posted...

He got off easy imo.

rexcrk posted...

What a piece of shit. He's lucky that's all he got.

This.
---

(\/)(\/)|-|

DumpsterMcNuggets posted...

That_70s_show posted...

Starbucks was the best choice.

Went ot the public library, it was closed for some reason.

Came to starbucks, getting 4.5 MB/s. 30x faster than my home internet.

I've often found I can access library wi-fi networks or Starbucks wi-fi networks, even when the places are closed. Just sit outside one of them,and do your downloading connecting to that wi-fi network.

Some of the Starbucks in my area (maybe all of them?) turn their wifi off while they're closed. You just get a message about coming back during business hours. Libraries seem to leave them on, though.
---

(\/)(\/)|-|

Damn, did I miss the Bernie Sanders topic? Bernie Sanders is awful. He made Ted "Let's see if sand can glow" Cruz look good by comparison.

Obama was a lousy president. I wouldn't rank him among the worst, but he's a bit worse than mediocre.

WastelandCowboy posted...

TheOrangeMisfit posted...

WastelandCowboy posted...

TheOrangeMisfit posted...

There's a lot about him I despise, the hypocrisy, arrogance, creating horrible racial tension in the country, and being an effeminate tool

You also just described Donald Trump.

Or basically any politician, at least Trump gets called out and ridiculed for it. Also Trump is definitely an alpha. What other president can have the quote, "Grab them by the pussy" attributed to them?

None, because they would have never made such a crude and sexist comment.

No, instead Bernie Sanders just accuses women of having fantasies about being raped by multiple men. And Hillary laughs at a 13 y/o rape victim's ordeal.
---

(\/)(\/)|-|

GameReviews posted...

I still don't know why they chose this woman to be Wonder Woman, she's a freaking stick figure and Wonder Woman is supposed to be an Amazon. It's about as good of casting as making Eric Foreman Venom.

Wonder Woman has been portrayed thin, Eddie Brock has not.
---

(\/)(\/)|-|

Muffinz0rz posted...

Kinda trivializing the death of a kid driven by bullying to suicide, which is a dick move.
---

(\/)(\/)|-|

Erik_P posted...

Where's the picture of the angry old man shaking his fist at clouds? That describes Zeus fairly well right now.

If only Erik was able to appreciate irony.
---

(\/)(\/)|-|

thedeerzord posted...

I went to Dairy Queen and saw a sign that said it was hiring with a starting wage at $12, but I'm looked on the the internet to see its wages, and it was less that what it said.

The problem with checking the internet is that individual stores might hire at a better wage than whatever it is you looked at. Keep in mind that DQ is a franchise.
---

(\/)(\/)|-|

TheCyborgNinja posted...

To his credit, at least as far as I am aware, he hasn't made an emo topic about leaving forever before blaming everyone else for what happened and never returning to hear an opposing view.

He doesn't need to leave to never hear an opposing view, he completely blocks them out anyway.
---

(\/)(\/)|-|

streamofthesky posted...

Aaantlion posted...

streamofthesky posted...

Aaantlion posted...

streamofthesky posted...

ConfessPlease posted...

Why would they have bail for someone like this wth.

There's a guy who was caught w/ bomb-making materials after his roomate told the police about him and he admitted that he intended to plant bombs synagogues (cause he's a neo-nazi) and nuclear power plants (because if you're going to be a terrorist, I guess go big).
The judge is actually considering setting a bail amount for that lunatic.

Shit makes no sense, I bet there are drug dealers arrested peacefully that have had bail denied, but intended/successful mass murderers gotta get their bail option.

Because apparently you believe that the accused shouldn't have rights? >_> We live in a nation which, because of the faults of other systems, we have a presumption of innocence until proven guilty beyond the shadow of a reasonable doubt so the biggest considerations aren't necessarily the scope of the crime but is he a flight risk, etc. The fact that somebody is accused of murder or plotted a mass murder doesn't necessarily matter with occasional exceptions.

He admitted he was planning to, AND they found the materials in his living quarters.
He still gets his trial, but it's pretty fucking blatantly obvious he's a serious danger to society and should be held until his trial.

But why am I arguing w/ you, you talk out of both sides of your ass? If some "liberal judge" gave bail to a suspected mass murderer w/ far less evidence against him than the above guy and he went on to kill people, you'd excoriate the "bleeding heart activist judge."

Except I'd say exactly the same thing, which is literally what I've said every single time it's come up. We live in a system of laws. Laws are meaningless if you ignore them whenever you fucking well feel like it.

There is no law guaranteeing that anyone being held for a trial is entitled to bail. There is a law to limit excessive bail amounts, but there is no such law saying every suspect MUST be given a bail option.

Judges deny bail for serious threats all the time. I think they know the law better than you do.

And, by your own logic, the fact that he wasn't denied bail means he wasn't a serious threat. After all, that judge knows the law better than you, right?
---

(\/)(\/)|-|

Yes, she deserves prison.

TheCyborgNinja posted...

Telling somebody to kill themselves shouldn't be a crime unless it's a situation where a parent is telling their child to do so (or something like that). Among peers, it's just not nice. Here, if she knew he was genuinely suicidal, fair enough, I guess... But even so, that punishment does not fit the crime.

It really does, though. If not for her egging him on, he'd still be alive today. Her actions directly led to his death and violated the law. On the plus side, she's still young so maybe she can be reformed so she's not a total sociopathic monster.
---

(\/)(\/)|-|

I think the topic needs a bump to get a gauge of how people really feel about him.
---

(\/)(\/)|-|

Jen0125 posted...

i don't think it is. for two people for a week long vacation in another country with all food/alcohol included seems pretty reasonable to me.

Hard to know for sure without really shopping around.
---

(\/)(\/)|-|

I probably shouldn't have called a rally for Courage, since that *could* encourage certain elements to vote Avatar to spite me >_>
---

(\/)(\/)|-|

streamofthesky posted...

Aaantlion posted...

streamofthesky posted...

ConfessPlease posted...

Why would they have bail for someone like this wth.

There's a guy who was caught w/ bomb-making materials after his roomate told the police about him and he admitted that he intended to plant bombs synagogues (cause he's a neo-nazi) and nuclear power plants (because if you're going to be a terrorist, I guess go big).
The judge is actually considering setting a bail amount for that lunatic.

Shit makes no sense, I bet there are drug dealers arrested peacefully that have had bail denied, but intended/successful mass murderers gotta get their bail option.

Because apparently you believe that the accused shouldn't have rights? >_> We live in a nation which, because of the faults of other systems, we have a presumption of innocence until proven guilty beyond the shadow of a reasonable doubt so the biggest considerations aren't necessarily the scope of the crime but is he a flight risk, etc. The fact that somebody is accused of murder or plotted a mass murder doesn't necessarily matter with occasional exceptions.

He admitted he was planning to, AND they found the materials in his living quarters.
He still gets his trial, but it's pretty fucking blatantly obvious he's a serious danger to society and should be held until his trial.

But why am I arguing w/ you, you talk out of both sides of your ass? If some "liberal judge" gave bail to a suspected mass murderer w/ far less evidence against him than the above guy and he went on to kill people, you'd excoriate the "bleeding heart activist judge."

Except I'd say exactly the same thing, which is literally what I've said every single time it's come up. We live in a system of laws. Laws are meaningless if you ignore them whenever you fucking well feel like it.
---

(\/)(\/)|-|

knivesX2004 posted...

Aaantlion posted...

How do you really know it was Russia?

It pinged to RU, which yeah it can be spoofed but that's what he's talking about.

It was a joke. I kinda assumed the RU thing =x
---

(\/)(\/)|-|

Rate that person sounds good, but I'm going for movie ratings.
---

(\/)(\/)|-|

jedirood posted...

No, I read your post. You said the real world, essentially saying that the Crusades weren't real.

Use better wording, or don't be surprised when we call you out and insult us for it

His meaning was pretty relatively clear, though. It's kind of a stretch to get the meaning you chose. Plus, even where the Crusades were involved, it was less religion than it was a land and wealth grab. While the same is true for a lot of wars concerning Islam -- since the government and religion were one and the same -- that's not so much true for most of the terrorists. And, historically speaking, most wars seemed to extol a belief in some god because when you might meet your maker, people tend to pray.
---

(\/)(\/)|-|

CountessRolab posted...

Aaantlion posted...

CountessRolab posted...

Christianity has a far more negative impact on most American's lives than Islam.

lol, just lol.

You cant deny that I am right.

If you read the rest of my post -- which you chose not to quote -- you'd realize how horrifyingly wrong you are. Everything you hate about Christianity, on a scale of 1-10, is less than a 1 compared to Islam. And, in Christianity's absence, Islam would grow.

Plus, in general, Christianity is one of the better religions.

shadowsword87 posted...

Atheism
I just want to see what would happen tbh.

Now I'm really tempted to pick that. I assume that most of them would fall into fringe cults, possibly worshiping spaghetti monsters, but it's still interesting.

jedirood posted...

Scientology.

That shit is pure evil. At least Islam is a legitimate religion. Scientology is a scam

While it is an awful cult, if we're going into cults there are probably worse one. Some of the Mormon cults which choose child brides while expelling the boys are an example.



Muffinz0rz posted...

Jesus christ, the Islamophobia in here is REAL. I thought PotD was more informed to know that Christianity has a far more negative impact than Islam does.

Good lord, people.

On-topic: I didn't vote because "all of them" isn't an option.

The denial is strong in this post.
---

(\/)(\/)|-|

Also worth noting that a lot of McDonald's and KFC's have free wifi, but YMMV on the quality. I would assume public libraries would be the best, though.

In general, malls also often have wifi but it's kinda shitty. Plus some department stores like Kohls have free wifi.
---

(\/)(\/)|-|

I would love to tell you how my Friday was, but Erik P would come in and -- projecting as usual -- accuse me of being a raging narcissist for sharing anything >_>
---

(\/)(\/)|-|

streamofthesky posted...

ConfessPlease posted...

Why would they have bail for someone like this wth.

There's a guy who was caught w/ bomb-making materials after his roomate told the police about him and he admitted that he intended to plant bombs synagogues (cause he's a neo-nazi) and nuclear power plants (because if you're going to be a terrorist, I guess go big).
The judge is actually considering setting a bail amount for that lunatic.

Shit makes no sense, I bet there are drug dealers arrested peacefully that have had bail denied, but intended/successful mass murderers gotta get their bail option.

Because apparently you believe that the accused shouldn't have rights? >_> We live in a nation which, because of the faults of other systems, we have a presumption of innocence until proven guilty beyond the shadow of a reasonable doubt so the biggest considerations aren't necessarily the scope of the crime but is he a flight risk, etc. The fact that somebody is accused of murder or plotted a mass murder doesn't necessarily matter with occasional exceptions.
---

(\/)(\/)|-|

Erik_P posted...

God, Zeus is so hilarious and just so sad to watch.

You need help to deal with your narcissism.

He says with blissful self-unawareness.

Melon_Master posted...

Aaantlion posted...

in Melon's case, he wants nothing more than to see me gone

That's actually not true, as I still had respect for you prior to all of this. But currently, I think you might need to seek help if these are serious responses coming from you. Again, why I suggested you taking a break, as this place can be an unhealthy environment.

Except you might not want to admit it, but it is true. You've been doing it for a while now and essentially your argument is, "I think you're getting bothered by the harassment so you should leave and, to help you along, I'm going to harass you myself to drive that point home." Whether or not you ever respected me is irrelevant to any of that. You can respect somebody and dislike them. For instance, I think Harlan Ellison is an incredible talent but he's also a colossal dick.

helIy posted...

dude you have multiple people all saying clarkduke has nothing to do with you

multiple people.

Because three or four people being wrong cancels out the wrong and turns it right? That makes zero sense. And most of the people who say he hasn't been attacking or trolling me are the very guys who also attack or troll me. Face it: There's ZERO justification to your claim about this being about Kana. Meanwhile it's had everything to do with me. Frankly, I can't recall one interaction with Clark where he didn't just start the interaction but he started it by either criticizing or attacking me yet you have people in here pretending civility. Erik raging P has been more civil than Clark. The only three people on this board who have been less civil to me than Clark are Koopa/Fr (whose favorite pastime is harassment), Arctic (who once threatened to strangle me... but knowing you, you're going to spin that into being about Kana), and Evray (who threatened to shoot me or suggested I be shot).
---

(\/)(\/)|-|

Depends on how fat they are, although QM's argument also works.
---

(\/)(\/)|-|

How do you really know it was Russia? It could be a 300 lb man on his bed in his underwear (aka... no, not doing that tonight)
---

(\/)(\/)|-|

Ogurisama posted...

Do you think that it could fall in something that isnt in the five biological kingdoms?

Given the structure of the kingdoms, that seems a little difficult. iirc, there have been some theories that life would likely follow similar patterns wherever it evolves although that's extrapolating on what we know of life.
---

(\/)(\/)|-|

jedirood posted...

I've never seen @ClarkDuke attack Zeus.

Then you're either blind, lurking, or delusional because that's pretty much all I've seen him do. He was doing it as consistently as Koopa/FR until I finally just blocked the troll alt.

argonautweakend posted...

helly posted...

Aaantlion posted...

In fact, Kana admitted that the Clarke thing has had nothing to do with them

considering she said that she figured it was there to troll her actually proves me right though

its clear as day why the account was created.

People in fact did mention kana looked like clark duke before it was made, the realization was already there.

it was obviously made by ziggi, because only he would care to troll kana, which is what hes done on his main for years.

like I figured this out within seconds of seeing the account name.

It's clear as day that an account created THE SAME AFTERNOON after I disclosed a personal story -- one which has never done anything to Kana but has repeatedly attacked me -- is after me, not Kana. And it's most likely connected to Koopa/Fr, who has also been obsessed with me.

The account has had exactly dickall to do with Kana, but has repeatedly gone after me. It has an image mocking something specific to me. It's pretending to have cancer which, again, has nothing to do with Kana, but everything to do with me. And, because you HAVE to know better and admitted a grudge against me, you're likely trolling by pretending to be ignorant to all of this.



Melon_Master posted...

OhhhJa posted...

Bottom line... clarkduke is a troll alt. And he doesn't have cancer. Only idiots are believing that shit

Your just as much a troll alt in my eyes (And others, considering you're more hostile than even Shenti). Especially since all you do is back up Zeus, in every single bat shit argument that he gets in.
So, you're either a troll instigating or just a very lonely person that attached himself to a narcissist for a sense of comfort. Either way, no one really cares.. seeing as you're backing up a likely middle-aged man, who is bordering certifiable at this point.
And whether someone has cancer or not, it has nothing to do with Zeus.. Yet he's trying to make it his pity party. As Clark, has been nothing but civil to Zeus, despite Zeus, insisting it's all related to him.

Except it has EVERYTHING do with Zeus considering when the account was created, the content on the account, the fact that it made a point of harassing me even before I started to call it out as a troll, etc. And you're only backing it up what you know to be a troll alt to get at me because you've repeatedly posted trying to get me to leave the board -- which you're going to try to deny now despite doing it again in this topic -- and this is just one more ruse to accomplish that.

InfernalFive posted...

Damn when did this place get so toxic? Topic turned to shit immediately lmao

No matter when or where I post, Koopa/Fr, Clark, and Erik are usually not that far away. And then all three (or all one?) of them try to egg me into feeding them. Well, Koopa/fr is on my ignore list, Clark is there too, and Erik might not be far off since it's made a point of quoting the troll alts to annoy me. And Argo and Melon are going to try to claim that it's Erik isn't doing it to annoy me because, in Melon's case, he wants nothing more than to see me gone -- which he's again prodded in this topic -- and Argo just flat-out doesn't like me, which he's disclosed a few times.
---

(\/)(\/)|-|

Erik_P posted...

Uh, you're aware that Nixon is dead right?

His spirit lives on in you.

Erik_P posted...

It's also funny you're crying about vitriol and toxicity against you when that's all you ever post and you're attacking a guy for having cancer, making it all about you.

It's funny that you're defending a glaring troll alt who made up claims of cancer and used mocking terms, etc, to harass me. The fact that you're suddenly on the side of troll alts like Koopa/Fr and Clark makes me wonder what your investment is with those accounts when everybody else acknowledges them as troll alts. If I find out that you're the guy behind that Clark account, I'm permanently ignoring your sorry, delusional ass.
---

(\/)(\/)|-|

Erik_P posted...

Its almost like the 2 cases are totally different from each other and can't be compared.

This, pretty much. Are you happy now, Muffinz? Your argument is so awful that Erik and I are on the same side. When's the last time Erik and I ever agreed on anything?
---

(\/)(\/)|-|

Rally rally rally rally! =x

Currently 39-37 so there's still hope. If either show won the whole thing, I'd be okay, though.
---

(\/)(\/)|-|

DorkLink posted...

I turned the radio off entirely in my car almost a year ago and have never looked back

I used to do back when the only alternative I saw was music stations. Then I somehow got hooked on NPR.

Erik_P posted...

Your other shitty topic got hijacked so you decided to make another useless topic about your life, when nobody cares about an extreme narcissist.

The irony is rather hilarious since you've made countless topics solely about pretend things happening in your life whereas I've made topics tangentially involving my life but really talking about other things. Not that you have any grasp of reality in general.

And, after you started to trollbrigade and harass that combined topic, I figured it made more sense to do individual topics so the subjects aren't hidden in your ocean of vitriol, toxicity, and hatred. And, in general, I didn't go into your cop topic to talk about the fact that you made up a stripper, or that you claimed the air was unbreathable in 2008, or any of your other nonsense claims. I stayed on topic and I would encourage you to do the same.

But sure, screencap what I'm saying here and add it to your immense library of recordings, Nixon.

DorkLink posted...

PotD sure has some nice, chill folks

To be fair, it's just Erik and some troll alts which, in all honesty, may or may not be connected to him. Their single-minded fixation on me certainly seems similar.
---

(\/)(\/)|-|

Unless I need the space, I never get rid of anything. Plus I wind up trying to conserve as much as possible.
---

(\/)(\/)|-|

SunWuKung420 posted...

This really isn't the best place to look for these answers. Why come here instead of their website? Fucking kids.

Clearly he's more one for Yahoo Answers.
---

(\/)(\/)|-|

Not even touching any more of this sleep powder argument. Having been locked down by hypnosis at times in earlier generations and having set up on sleep, I stand by what I said especially within the highlighted generation.

Muffinz0rz posted...

A fetish for what, creating strawpolls? Either way, that's just you trying to stir up more conversation points. The generation is irrelevant because that's beside the point. One person's "given generation" can be gen 3, whereas your "given generation" is gen 1. There's no difference. The point is that it highlights how differently one's team can be based on the starter, regardless of generation. For every person like you, who prefers Bulbasaur in gen 1 and switches things up in other gens, there's someone else who prefers Mudkip in gen 3 and switches things up in other gens. The poll has no bias and is clear and relevant.

Strawpolls? They're so deceptively set up, you might as well call them strawman polls! You're phrasing things to get the results you want which support your pre-existing conclusions and, for the most part, they bear little or no direct relevance to the discussion.

Muffinz0rz posted...

The point is that it highlights how differently one's team can be based on the starter, regardless of generation.

Except it really doesn't. Your starter doesn't necessarily exempt you from using other things.

Muffinz0rz posted...

You can't expect anyone to remember their exact teams through dozens, maybe even over 100, of different playthroughs. This is simply a rhetorical statement. Regardless, even "one" is more than enough. But even if I haven't, it's because I haven't gotten to it yet. Know why? Because there are 802 Pokemon. If you assume a "main" team size of six, it would take you 133 playthroughs to say you've mained every single Pokemon.

Of course, I do recognize that a fair chunk of those numbers come from evolutionary lines. Obviously one wouldn't go about maining a Bulbasaur instead of Venusaur. I couldn't find the total number of "final form" Pokemon though, but I would bet money that it'd still take damn near 100 playthroughs, as opposed to 133. Doesn't sound like a lot, I know, but a given playthrough can take weeks (unless you don't work or are on summer vacation).

Given that Dunsparce is garbage, it's rhetorical for almost every player out there. While a lot of Pokemon may exist, people tend to stick to a relatively smaller number given the looks and utility. And sure, in some games this occasionally leads to a hard choice or two, but usually it's not *that* hard of a decision. No matter how many times you play, you're almost guaranteed to not use the same handful of terrible or mediocre Pokemon unless you're deliberately doing so as some kind of a weird challenge, which is the equivalent to trying to beat a FPS only using melee attacks (which you can also do for "variety")
---

(\/)(\/)|-|

Yellow posted...

Oh that guy? That's really messed up. Riot, sure.

Based on what exactly? Again, the video that people are referring to is all after the fact. We have no idea what happened during the confrontation beyond the word of eyewitnesses.
---

(\/)(\/)|-|

Erik_P posted...

Aaantlion posted...

Smarkil posted...

Fucking racist white cops

I can't tell if you're being sarcastic although, given that you're generally informed on these matters, I suspect you are being sarcastic. After all, Jeronimo Yanez isn't a very "white" name.

Now you're being racist for judging someone based on their name.

Apparently the fact that he's also not a white-looking guy makes somebody racist for mentioning he's not white. That and the newspapers were racist for pointing out that he's Latino while also noting that no Latinos sat in the jury (instead it was 10 whites and 2 blacks)
---

(\/)(\/)|-|

Smarkil posted...

Fucking racist white cops

I can't tell if you're being sarcastic although, given that you're generally informed on these matters, I suspect you are being sarcastic. After all, Jeronimo Yanez isn't a very "white" name.
---

(\/)(\/)|-|