Lurker > Fam_Fam

enjoying sexual activities that i like with my female significant other

so we don't want poor people to get the money...?

MuayThai85 posted...

I started to type one up about "grape" but these mods love any excuse to mod me.

something something about whine

"is doing sexual stuff with your wife gay"

brotrrwinner posted...

Yes, that was my real password

if it wasn't, then its not a very useful test

brotrrwinner posted...

I think I'm good

rofl you put your password up on a site that collects passwords?

you are a genius

better than flirting with her child

Foppe posted...

I like more shrtless female workers.

i'll be calling HR

"as a cis white male, you can't really understand..."

u know why people dont like him, dont u

tm315 posted...

What are stack sizes? seems very deep. Edit: now I see, not that deep with the staddle, only 78bb effective

Pre flop is good

I'm not super excited about that flop, but I like it enough. But when SB leads 3/4 pot into two players, including the pre-flop aggressor, some alarm bells are going off. That is a pretty strong play, although the board does have a lot of draws.

But when the straddle raises huge over that bet, does he do that with just AJ? That's very strong. I don't think anyone has KK or AA often because they both just called pre in a straddled pot. But I think at best for you, straddle has either AJ, combo draw, J+flush draw, J9s, JJ, 99, or 55. I don't think you're looking too good vs. that range and you have a big raise to call. Idk exactly what the equity is tho, it might be close. But I guess since he turned up with J9o, maybe he does make that raise with just JT, or any random J.

It's definitely jam/fold when it gets to you. I might go broke here sometimes too, it's easy to put someone on a draw and someone a jack. But I think if you end up with one caller, you're usually up against a combo draw (you're a 56% favorite) or a 2pr/set (you're a pretty big dog). If you get two callers, I think you're always in bad shape. I really don't think the straddle turns up with too many hand you beat when the action on the flop goes like that.

I think I like a fold, unless straddle and SB have been playing super aggressive

good analysis here. I'd lean toward fold if my best case scenario is 56% equity (and there are very few combo draws out there, maybe 3 combos?), and every other hand in the range has you way down

Smashingpmkns posted...

Why is it that all gaming companies like this? Jesus Christ.

why are a group of shut-in men misogynistic? no clue

fair next

No_U_L7 posted...

actually i just realized he was the straddle so he was actually getting decent pot odds. so i gotta make a note, when the straddle in play, i gotta use that as the base multiplier for my raises. so it should have been raised to like $4 instead of 3.25 and he'd probably fold

yes, 4 (or 4.5) would have been good to fold out things like suited connectors as well.

pro tip here: you had no reason to raise there. what would possibly call you that you beat decisively? Also, it's multi-way. Theres a lot of hands they have (i.e. suited connectors, sets) that put you in a bad position equity-wise. so would have been a good fold with that action in front you. in that situation, the suited connector in hearts was probably the worst possible hand they could have had, and even if you had them heads up, its not a great position for you to be in.

its weird having a life. I've had active messages for years and years and years

Hop103 posted...

In voice acting, it's impossible, the talent is way too small for such to be implemented without a loss in quality, the US is not Japan where voice acting schools are a thing and even some big names such as Kadokawa have their own schools.

then there's a demand for these schools and a job market for people who attend? sounds like a win-win to me.

s0nicfan posted...

In practice it works like this: minorities can play anyone, and white people can play white people.

this is partially because white is considered the "default" in the US, and minority characters usually have this as part of their identity/reason for existing.

In many movies, the person being black is part of the character, and so you'd want someone black to portay it (because a white actor wouldn't make sense). this is why you'd want a minority to play that character. Same thing with trans characters. You usually don't have them without that being part of why they are in the film, so it makes to have someone trans play the role, because they uniquely fit the character (and understand the character) in a way that someone else may not.

Often when a character is white, there is no significance to that. The race of the person playing that character usually doesn't matter because their identity is rarely important to the story / the other characters.

not 4 u

Yoga BANG

have you seen a woman with bad social skills?

that should answer the question

ill never look at my dutch porn the same again

if the racist either hurts their company or influences their (perceived) ability to do their job effectively, then yes

i suspect her height and weight are in a normal range.

people here just have weird thoughts on body types

This is sad. Black Lives Matter, and they should matter to everyone.

rip

SodomInsane posted...

Isn't it even lower than a 4.6% fatality rate. What is wrong with what they said?

Is it that it is a Republican saying death rate low?

99% harmless would mean only 1% are harmed

but 4.6% die. ignoring the harm done to anyone who doesnt die, that's more than 1%

Questionmarktarius posted...

How does that work in Boston?

this is why everyone thinks Bostonians are racist, actually

oh and reply to #2

the racist award is what you win

[and a moderation]

dont need to say anything

DoctorPiranha3 posted...

"Natural habitat" is bullshit. As long as animals, humans included, have their base needs met (food, water, shelter, sex), they're content.

then why do some people with food, water, shelter, and sex commit suicide?

ohiostate124 posted...

There is no way all of that was just from the coronavirus.

well i guess if you say so it must be true!

just got it, 75 per month (boston ma)

Dark_SilverX posted...

Eat dem groceries

hells to the yes

nowadays disney princesses will be expected to understand the perspective of their antagonists and educate them, rather than resort to violence

Veggeta X posted...

Bro there was always Priya Rai

he said middle eastern

why is porn a "dishonest" living?

we already do

"suffers"

GoodOlJr posted...

Im not doing this destiny/vaush internet dance and sending you a link to refute

Of course theres a fat acceptance push, and the cultures shifting from favouring boobs to asses

i'm reading this as you're making shit up with zero evidence. fat acceptance has nothing to do with asking you to find them attractive

GoodOlJr posted...

Are you for real?

indeed. please show me some instances where people said that other should be attracted to people regardless of their preferences with respect to physical characteristics.

Tote_All_y posted...

I'm really not, though. It's not a "looks" thing either, it's the whole process, maintenance and bacterial growth.

what does maintenance and bacterial growth (issues they have to deal with) have to do with you wanting to date those women?

Tote_All_y posted...

I've seen some pretty strong pressure to be attracted to overweight women, yes.

i've never seen that before. can you point this out?

Tote_All_y posted...

Is "sex through penetration is important to me and anal does not appeal to me, also I don't like penises", valid?

seems reasonable to me. if you are fine with post-op transwomen with vaginas, then you are all set!

WashYourHands posted...

A taco dressed as an eggplant is still a taco

agreed, crossdressers are dressing in a way that is opposite their sex.

we're talking about transgender people though, which are not necessarily the same thing as crossdressers (or transvestites)

Tote_All_y posted...

Can I accept them as woman I'm not attracted to?

has anyone forced you to be attracted to any woman in the past? if not, you should be good.

toyota posted...

dont have anything against trans women but they arent women in the same way cis-women are women

to say so is blatantly false. whilst they are both women, why cant we just all agree that there are different varieties of women?

i'm pretty sure that's what people are saying. they are also women. that's it. that shouldn't be difficult to accept/deal with.

poor kid