Lurker > Laserion

I sit on the toilet, facing the cistern.
(waves to 200X)
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Did you already make plans with that girl in the first picture of that topic "Girls who have shown interest in me"? Don't remember her name, but she was far away from you. You were to fly there and have a weekend with her and rent a hotel room for the weekend.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

cjsdowg posted...

Laserion posted...

cjsdowg posted...

imlmentied

What is this word?

Why post that, was a I wise ass to you in the past ?

I sincerely didn't understand, but...
BLAKUboy posted...

Laserion posted...

cjsdowg posted...

imlmentied

What is this word?

I assumed it was supposed to be implemented.

This makes sense.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

cjsdowg posted...

imlmentied

What is this word?
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Isn't checking for updates and notifying you about them options that you could just uncheck?
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Tadamoto22 posted...

Fam_Fam posted...

its easier for them to say that than say you are lame and they dont want you

Why not? I've had girls say far worse shit to me. Might as well be honest.

Because:
Tadamoto usually says:

"She said I was ugly and boring, what a bitch, why do girls have to be so mean to me?"

---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Me: 21 35 37 43 72; 05
MM: 21 33 36 45 56; 12

4-of-5, no MB = $500
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Oh, so this isn't about biology, but religion.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

stevethewindow posted...

Biologically it serves no purpose other than self gratification.

So, vasectomied man+tube-tied woman is wrong too?
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Oh, I read the other topic:
https://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/400-current-events/75852487
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

wolverinev2 posted...

The Concept of him being able to just transfer parts of his soul into people and dolls now.

What? Is he Voldemort now?
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

No deal. You could have at least allowed to choose the 200, so we could pick the 200 scummiest.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

frozenshock posted...

ModLogic posted...

is there a specific law that says you can't eat meat of same race?

If you throw pieces of fried chickens at pigeons and they eat it, is it cannibalism?

They are birds. We eat mammals. Not same species.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Yes. Also, wear body-length robes which are lifted only enough for doing the deed, lights out, touch as little as possible, and try not to enjoy it.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Krystalcyanide posted...

Totally not a fan but always bugged me that it was celebrated in the USA as a legit sport when all you do is kick a ball with your feet all day and kick it. Goalie work all you do is catch the ball and whatever I mean Megaman Soccer was 10/10 but real soccer is strange and easy to play.

In football all you do is grab the ball (with the hands!) and run and run and try to cannonball through everyone who tries to stop you.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

ThyCorndog posted...

someone right outside the window looking back would be the most realistic thing that would scare me the most in that moment

Also, some wild animal. But animals out in the backyard when I'm safe inside aren't scary, only people.

Vindris_SNH posted...

Wouldn't some sort of alien looking thing be worse than a human?

Well, that too. Although more scary if it looks like something sapient, instead of an alien animal.

No backyard, instead a lot of water, and rising. Although this would mean I would be stepping in water as soon as I get out of bed.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Yellow cars are parked?
Use them as an extension to your road. You get into the intersection as far as the yellow cars allow you, being able to see by their left side instead of through their windshields.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Janelle

Hey. Your page is creepy

Pics of page.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

CD coasters
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

If you're told to drop "the gun" and it's a camera/phone, can you lower it instead? What if you drop it on your foot to let it land softly?

We need to start making TV cameras bright orange. If I was reporting on things like this, I would paint mine.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Sega Master System.

----
edit: No, wait. Atari 2600, then 7800.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

hollow_shrine posted...

I didn't think the Amish believed in tech intensive medical procedures like artificial insemination.

From what is being posted, I think this is natural insemination.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Only at work.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Vega = claw (Spanish guy Spanish name)
M. Bison = boxer (Mike Tyson)
Sagat was left the same, and also SF1, so leave him alone.
That leaves only Balrog for the red guy.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Regretting not genociding isn't a good thing.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Well, I have you tagged as "lifesucksdie". How long has it been that way?
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Someone provided a link to an emoji keyboard online, and in the examples, there were a few of those.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Wasn't it "Big League"?
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

C_Pain posted...

Are you an entomologist?

Came in to ask this.

dolomedes posted...

C_Pain posted...

Are you an entomologist?

i prefer 'amateur arachnologist' or just plain ol' bug dork.

OK.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

So beat the bullies' parents instead?
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Have absolutely everyone have a gun.
Make absolutely everything shot traceable to who shot it. Something better than barrel markings.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Because they had different ways of use in DB. It was also more focused on techniques and styles. Then came DBZ and everyone shoots the same, and it's a competition on who can ki-fart the loudest.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Are "scissors" a type of knife? You have two in a "pair of scissors".
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

So, people wore a loincloth, and then two legs of clothings or "pants"?
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Doesn't that just work for getting on the content they provide?
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

CircleOfManias posted...

are so well known that no one actually knows they were originally a spoiler.

Jekyll and Hyde are the same person.

What!? I read that only once, about two decades ago. I don't remember not knowing, probably because I already knew. I'll have to get a copy and read it all over again, this time, knowing that I shouldn't know yet!

You know, the reverse of when you see a movie and find out the twist, and then re-watch it, looking for all the clues they left.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

W7 Chrome, at one school:


Android Chrome on my phone:


W10 Chrome, at my school:

---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

NeonOctopus posted...

Can I make money by donating my poop for fecal transplants?

There's an episode of Grey's Anatomy where a woman kills all her bacteria with antibiotics, including all the beneficial ones in her intestines. She has to get a poop transplant from her boyfriend/husband, because they live together and share the same germs.

http://greysanatomy.wikia.com/wiki/In_the_Midnight_Hour

Lauren confesses to Alex she ordered antibiotics online to kill a staph infection. Seth can't believe she did that, as the dermatologist said it was just a pimple. Lauren says it went away after the drugs. Alex says she now has C. diff, which won't go away. She killed all the healthy bacteria in her body, so they have to introduce new bacteria. They have to perform a fecal transplant, and the donor has to be someone she shares daily germs with. Seth only consents until Lauren admits it was a pimple. Lauren won't do that.

---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Guerrilla Soldier posted...

got my number in 10 minutes

You were clicking that thing for 10 minutes?
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

markconigliaro posted...

"You don't drink?!?"
"No"
"Why not?!?"
"I don't want to"
"Try this though, it's really good"
"No thanks"
"Pleeeese, for me!" / "just try it and I'll never ask you again" / "I just want to see what your like drunk" / "Someday I'm going to get you wasted"

I'm just here with my soda, I don't say a word about alcohol yet I get people interrogating me all the time.

Perhaps you need to fake it. Get a alcohol-with -coke-looking glass, and pour your soda there.
Technically, there is nothing you can do drunk that you can't do sober. Just go ahead and dance on that table just for the fun of it.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

A train is a form of rail transport consisting of a series of connected vehicles that usually runs along a rail track to transport cargo or passengers. Motive power is provided by a separate locomotive or individual motors in self-propelled multiple units. Although historically steam propulsion dominated, the most common modern forms are diesel and electric locomotives, the latter supplied by overhead wires or additional rails. Other energy sources include horses, engine or water-driven rope or wire winch, gravity, pneumatics, batteries, and gas turbines. Train tracks usually consist of two running rails, sometimes supplemented by additional rails such as electric conducting rails and rack rails, with a limited number of monorails and maglev guideways in the mix. The word 'train' comes from the Old French trahiner, from the Latin trahere 'pull, draw'.

There are various types of trains that are designed for particular purposes. A train may consist of a combination of one or more locomotives and attached railroad cars, or a self-propelled multiple unit (or occasionally a single or articulated powered coach, called a railcar). The first trains were rope-hauled, gravity powered or pulled by horses. From the early 19th century almost all were powered by steam locomotives. From the 1910s onwards the steam locomotives began to be replaced by less labor-intensive and cleaner (but more complex and expensive) diesel locomotives and electric locomotives, while at about the same time self-propelled multiple unit vehicles of either power system became much more common in passenger service.

A passenger train is one which includes passenger-carrying vehicles which can often be very long and fast. One notable and growing long-distance train category is high-speed rail. In order to achieve much faster operation over 500 km/h (310 mph), innovative maglev technology has been researched for years. In most countries, such as the United Kingdom, the distinction between a tramway and a railway is precise and defined in law. The term light rail is sometimes used for a modern tram system, but it may also mean an intermediate form between a tram and a train, similar to a heavy rail rapid transit system except that it may have level crossings.

A freight train (also known as a goods train) uses freight cars (also known as wagons or trucks) to transport goods or materials (cargo). Freight and passengers may be carried in the same train in a mixed consist.

Rail cars and machinery used for maintenance and repair of tracks, etc., are termed maintenance of way equipment; these may be assembled into maintenance of way trains. Similarly, dedicated trains may be used to provide support services to stations along a train line, such as garbage or revenue collection.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

A list of possible solutions to the sample problem published in the Common Core standards obtained by reporters indicated that Ugh, Im offended, Triggered, Trains scare me, Boston scares me, Milwaukee scares me, and Kill yourself, would all be scored as correct.

Seriously?

A list of possible solutions to the sample problem published in the Common Core standards obtained by reporters indicated that Ugh, Im offended, Triggered, Trains scare me, Boston scares me, Milwaukee scares me, and Kill yourself, would all be scored as correct.

Too bad. This news suck and is now about trains.

On a side note, it seems like "smart quotes" (smart quotes) look better after that Unicode update.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

After the McDonald's case, every fast food has "Caution! Hot" all around their cups. Does this now count as good enough warning if you burn yourself from now on? What needs to be made clear is if the bartender gave a good enough warning about how long to wait (until the vapors dissipate, perhaps?) before drinking, or failed to do so.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

SoundNetwork posted...

...a bunch of generalizations about non-drinkers.

All of them?
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

M_Live posted...

"Your friend told us they saw you do X or already confessed"

Do you still have the right to confront your accuser, if the accuser is suspected of being your accomplice? Because if you can, demand that they bring your friend to you and tell it to your face.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Like asking "Are you a cop?". You're already seeing the uniform, aren't you? Unless you mean when off duty.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Lightning bolts shot out of the blue sky and killed those people.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".