Lurker > RuneterranSnap

GuerrillaSoldier posted...

lmao

making it "a decent game" after many years isn't considered "coming around"

It's a fantastic game.

NMS is amazing though

If they don't like it beneath them they can always switch positions....

DeathVelvien posted...

4 > 3 > 2 > 1

Sabbath is the best band here, but fuck if they aren't dragged down by the rest of that ticket.

Joan Jett rules shut your mouth

ragnarokius posted...

A lot of the users probably finally got laid.

*tries to maintain straight face*

Why is this so unbelievable?

They're old enough to have a job and afford to directly or indirectly buy it.

DKBananaSlamma posted...

Where the fuck are the pics!?

Seriously. CE lost its way

Yeah no this is a definite improvement.

Intro2Logic posted...

Who decides what facts are?

Nobody. Facts simply are facts.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

Ok so you just want to be angry, got it. You do you.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

It is, and since you can't seem to move past that fact you're done in this discussion.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

Saying it's not ok but you're overflowing what they did isn't defending their actions.

Frankly them vaping and being a public nuisance in the theater is more upsetting than some mild over the clothes groping, as is them refusing to leave.

I called you out for exaggerating the groping and questioned whether it's illegal. There's no lie there and nothing wrong with what I said.

Now if I'm misunderstanding the facts of what they did(very possible I haven't closely followed this) then by all means point it out. Otherwise what you're doing is nothing but trolling because I'm not as offended at a specific action as you, especially considering as far as I can tell you and I still agree on what should be done, the only disagreement being why.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

Irrelevant.

None of what I'm talking about are things people "consider" to be lies. They are factually lies.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

I do. You don't.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

I do. You don't understand what I'm proposing.

GranTurismo posted...

their stories were terrible though.

That's your opinion and also irrelevant to the discussion

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

So not what we're talking about and not relevant to the discussion, got it.

GranTurismo posted...

you guys like the avatar movies? cameron has done better

They were both significant achievements no other movie matched regarding the use of 3d and are objectively major earners

So no lies then, just another baseless claim.

bsp77 posted...

I am actually thinking about it. Hard to know for sure since he has only done Avatar in the 2000s. And it is absolutely astounding how fantastic the legs on Way of Water were. But it is a sample size of 2 (post Titanic) vs a sample size of 5 (post Dark Knight). Hollywood has been so different since the late 2000s that looking earlier wouldn't work anymore anyway.

So I am not saying you are wrong, I am saying I don't have the data to tell. I could call it a statistical tie.

You might be right that he wouldn't have the same success, but the question is who is bankable, and the reality is no director is more bankable than the director who, after making two of the biggest film franchises in history already, made a movie that held the highest grossing mark for over a decade until the director came back with a tech everyone thought was a joke, used it right for once, and created a new highest grossing picture.

GranTurismo posted...

why is oppenheimer much more successful cause barbie came out? have heard others say this

Barbenheimer. Barbie was a smash success and since Oppenheimer was connected with it in the public consciousness it got pulled up.

Don't get me wrong it would've done ok on its own, just nowhere near its current success.

ai123 posted...

Inception, Interstellar, Dunkirk.

The Prestige isn't one of his 'big' films, but it is a fantastic movie.

Point is that Nolan can make box office out of most drama genres (sci fi, psychological thriller, war film, neo noir, superhero, biopic). Cameron does 'blockbusters'.

The only one of those that wasn't a blockbuster was Oppenheimer which is only so successful because of Barbie.

bsp77 posted...

Other than the Batman movies, Inception, Interstellar, Dunkirk and Oppenheimer all made a ton of money. Even Tenet made a lot considering it was September of 2020. None of these are franchise flicks yet they perform like them based on his name. Whether you like him or not, he is objectively the most bankable director today.

Other than Cameron.

Where did I lie?

GranTurismo posted...

yeah i liked one of their movies. Fargo , it was really kinda violent. The rest are meh haven't seen many though

"The rest are meh" tells me everything I need to know about your opinion on them rofl

And the answer is yes. Nolan is ok, Oppenheimer wouldn't have been nearly as successful without Barbie, and nothing Nolan has made will compare to Cameron's back to back to back to back behemoths

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

I mean not really? You said something wrong, got called out on it, and now the conversation is moving on. You can keep hyperfixating on it as you tend to if you like.

Dat_Cracka_Jax posted...

Looks like TC main account blocked me for some reason

What?

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

Typically shoddy reading comprehension from you.

VGAddict90 posted...

We can't rely on the DNC to fix the problem?

Does it look like they're trying to fix the problem now?

Because we have Texas and Florida both openly violating federal law, failing their duties, and endangering their citizens and the DNC sits on its ass.

Sufferedphoneix posted...

We have moderately to wildly successful people that have made all the right choices in life that support Trump.

And that last point proves either they're terrible people or they make terrible choices and either way should mean they can't vote.

This isn't a debate.

The DNC isn't interested in fixing the problem and as soon as we get rid of the GOP they're next.

GranTurismo posted...

oh you hate chick fila because of the conservative groups they support or have in the past...etc..?

Like any intelligent person.

I dont have a Popeyes near me and Chick FIL A deserves to go out of business so they're still the best

Sufferedphoneix posted...

They where only for him cause he once mentioned prison reform..

My point is with habitual felons it's a pretty much proven fact at that point..

As said I'm on the fence on that one. You got some damn intelligent inmates but for every one of them you got 5 dumbass ones.

Not to make fun of a guy but had one the other day who kept spelling fair as fear.

I read his greiveance. He was mad at a woman officer for chewing him out. After some digging I found out she was chewing him out cause he was trying to jack off on her then some more digging he's in for rape of someone younger than 15 and 2 assault on female charges. It can be real hard to have sympathy for someone like that

It doesn't matter. Everyone should have the right to vote, period.

If we allow Trump supporters to vote which we inexplicably still do, we cannot use level of intelligence or decision making ability as a justification to ban prisoners.

LeCh0nk posted...

Those who control media control the truth. Elon Musk could very well declare climate change to be a hoax. Who's gonna stop him? He can make saying anything about climate change against the tou of Twitter. It's not right, but nobody's gonna stop him.

It sucks people can say whatever they want, but the alternative is the truth is just as likely to be censored as the lie.

Literally all that would haooen in your example would be people calling out Musk for denying climate change, and we'd potentially have an avenue to jail him if these laws were in place.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

Nobody is defending it.

We're saying what they did is awful because of where they did it, not because of what they did.

And frankly if you want to get into it, calling over the clothes groping diddling is ridiculous and I'm not even sure this would be a crime since there was far as I saw zero exposure, but I could be wrong and I'm also nowhere near knowledgeable enough about local laws to be confident in that.

Sufferedphoneix posted...

I'm on the fence. I get what people are saying but also a lot of them have proven time and again they don't have good critical decision making skills. Maybe a compromise? Normally they can vote but not if a habitual felon?

I was floored by the amount of black inmates that where pro Trump.

If we're going to allow Trump supporters to vote then decision making doesn't factor in to who gets the right.

Smallville posted...

i'm not sure about this. Voting. Do most of you guys agree with this? Have heard people say that if you're in prison you've forfeited some of your rights...etc...

You shouldn't forfeit any rights beyond what's necessary to imprison you. That includes voting and slavery. I'd also argue having a felony shouldn't automatically mean you lose rights to own guns if it was a nonviolent crime, but thats a pretty narrow group it'd effect for the amount of effort.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

4.

SpawnShadow posted...

The only reason I can't support this idea is because the Republicans (and other right-wing parties elsewhere in the world) have enough power now that they could easily use it to make being opposed to them on any position a felony.

This is something we should have done long ago, to stop the GOP from rising to power in the first place, but now, I can only see it being used as a cudgel against anything even remotely left-leaning.

No they literally couldn't.

We're not talking about things some random politician claims is a lie. Were talking about things that are proven lies, and we have proof beyond a reasonable doubt the groups or people in question knee they were a lie.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

I'm guessing he was meaning the act itself was fine, not where it happened.

Frankly I agree nobody should care beyond the hypocrisy of Boebert, inappropriate time and place so I support her getting kicked out and maybe charged, but morally I don't care.

MisterPengy posted...

You could make 4 just Queen and I would still pick it.

Freddy Mercury passed away when I was 5. It would be amazing to see him perform live.

And Brian May. His guitar is among the best in the world.

4, I can go get food during Joplin

SuperSaiyanTien posted...

Not all big dogs were specifically bred for generations to perfect certain dangerous traits.

Towards animals.

Human aggression was specifically bred out of them.

But facts don't support your agenda.

Dark_Arbron posted...

I recall in Australia they recently said they were cracking down on disinformation campaigns, but Rupert Murdoch came from here, so well see.

More countries need to do it, do any have laws to combat this? Because at this point it's decades past due.

Should've been done after McDonald's showed how dangerous and effective it could be, people still believe that grandma was the one at fault

A felony.

Things like pil execs lying for years about climate change, Trump pushing bad covid cures, Alex Jones and Joe Rogan regarding Sandy Hook, McDonald's and the hot coffee lady, etc etc.

You should not be able to brazenly lie with a massive following like that, you should be held responsible for your words.

Gwynevere posted...

wtf do they even mean by this

I'm guessing they're wanting to know if Trump is a transphobe or not

Dark_Arbron posted...

Especially since quite a lot of labour society takes for granted is performed by prisoners. A legitimate wage for that work should be obvious.

It'd also do wonders for reducing recidivism if they had money from work on coming out.

Technically 8, there's no global law against murder, just a lot of individual laws

We know for a fact they did by gerrymandering at very least.

I'm also exceptionally pissed that we're just watching him commit human rights violations in setting traps across river crossings and just quietly asking "please don't".

CA doing the job of the federal government again