Lurker > thanosibe

Paragon21XX posted...

When the obviously unfit one runs out of stamina (usually after a couple of minutes).

You know you've been playing too much Breath of the Wild when you envision two lesbians with stamina wheels above them, for this scenario.
---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

Alucard188 posted...

Marvo Rocks posted...

When both people feel satisfied. The same way it should end between straight couples.

So one climaxes, then rolls over and immediately goes to sleep, leaving the other one unsatisfied?

Perhaps if you are a man that can't please a woman properly.
---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

NeonOctopus posted...

thanosibe posted...

NeonOctopus posted...

thanosibe posted...

People take their porn way too seriously.

This isn't just about the porn, this is about the very foundation of America!

Is it really? So it's really me that's not taking porn seriously enough?

exactly

http://imgur.com/a/NoEsw
---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

NeonOctopus posted...

thanosibe posted...

People take their porn way too seriously.

This isn't just about the porn, this is about the very foundation of America!

Is it really? So it's really me that's not taking porn seriously enough?
---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

People take their porn way too seriously.
---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

Schwarber posted...

thanosibe posted...

Schwarber posted...

If only someone would think of the poor Trump supporters and their feelings

If you don't want to actually add anything of value to the conversation like many people are; the door is that way.

Fuck CE is getting insufferable.

I know you like to throw the word triggered around, but you seem pretty triggered bro. Honestly your responses don't deserve a response, because you're clearly not in the right state of mind to have a discussion. I can't tell if you're trolling or not with your constant whining, but the business had no obligation to make this for the customers and no amount of "but"s or "yeah but what if"s will change that.

Excellent. No actual awareness of your own shit posting. No surprise as I've never seen you actually contribute nothing more than insults when you can manage to add any intellectual content to the subject at hand. Again CE is becoming so fucking insufferable for any poster willing to debate anything.
---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

OpheliaAdenade posted...

thanosibe posted...

OpheliaAdenade posted...

i wanna ask him if i can touch those abs

Ewwwww.

dont lie you'd wanna touch them too. :u just look at them

No ma'am. I'm the most heterosexual man on the planet. ;-)
---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

OpheliaAdenade posted...

i wanna ask him if i can touch those abs

Ewwwww.
---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

Capn Circus posted...

thanosibe posted...

As long as there'll be booze I'll be there.

That's how the parties get started...

Not to stink the thread up with facts, but scientifically alcohol is a solution.
---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

As long as there'll be booze I'll be there.
---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

Darmik posted...

thanosibe posted...

Where do we cross the line at what a business can refuse to do without it being discriminatory?

I've already answered this.

If they provide the same exact service/cake to customers but refuse to do the same for specific groups of people that's discrimination.

If they have to bake the figures on top of the cake manually. Sure. They can refuse baking two same sex figures and say they don't do that. But they should still be able to offer an alternative. In pretty much all of these cases they refuse to serve the couple at all.

If you advertise that you bake wedding cakes you need to provide that service to everyone who wants a wedding cake.

So if you advertise that you make custom cakes but won't make a custom Trump MAGA hat cake and that's not discriminatory but it's different than advertising you make wedding cakes but not homosexual wedding cakes and that is discrimination?

Yeah we're definitely going to have to agree to disagree.
---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

AlmasNo1Fan posted...

sylverlolol posted...

Ving_Rhames posted...

lol Parents who put politics onto their kids are the worst.

That said they shouldn't have a problem with a place refusing to bake a cake for them for any reason, it happened to a couple trying to get a wedding cake made, why can't it happen to anyone else

Uh...the state stepped in and heavily fined the bakers who refused to bake something for the same sex couple. Do you not think the baker here should be fined as well?

I was actually going to mention this too. I wonder how it will pan out because even if the bakers disagree with Trump, the act of imposing their beliefs onto their customers and bringing about consequences for their disagreement muddies the waters because its Trump sets a dangerous precedent for refusing the service of, for example, homosexual couples as you mentioned and we encountered before.

So while I can see the logic, I just wish these bakers saw a larger picture. I am not personally pro-Trump but the current events surrounding him and his presidency unearth a nasty loophole that reveals how certain chastisable behaviors become OK when its against Trump. However, once those behaviors become acceptable, everyone becomes vulnerable. . . Such a (pun intended) sticky situation.

This is what I'm trying to convey. But you've done it better.
---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

@Darmik I'm on my phone so this is easier than quoting.

A homosexual cake will feature two male figurines on the top of the cake, if I remember the article right, and that was the objection of the bakery is that they didn't want to promote homosexual marriage. Which I don't agree with. But that's the point I'm getting at. Where do we cross the line at what a business can refuse to do without it being discriminatory? If feelings don't fall into the catergory of acceptable refusals then what's the difference between refusing to promote homosexual marriage and Trump as a president?
---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

Schwarber posted...

If only someone would think of the poor Trump supporters and their feelings

If you don't want to actually add anything of value to the conversation like many people are; the door is that way.

Fuck CE is getting insufferable.
---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

Darmik posted...

thanosibe posted...

If we are going to make exceptions,

I'll stop you there. There are no exceptions being made. That is a difference between refusing certain customers completely and refusing to make custom products.

It's plain and simple. You can't force a business to bake a cake depicting gay sex. But that doesn't mean a bakery can refuse to serve gay customers.

You can't force a business to make a product they don't provide.

Did they refuse the cake because it was from a homosexual couple or did they refuse it for the message that the couple wanted on the cake? I mean refusing two male figurines depicting a homosexual couple on a cake and a MAGA message on cake isn't all that different. They both carry a message the bakery wasn't comfortable with. It's a bias because it's easier to exempt the Trump supporters getting refused rather than the homosexual couple because Trump is a dumbass. But is it really different? Honestly?

Also I'm misunderstanding your last statement. It seems to contradict your previous statements. But I agree you can't force a business to make a product they don't provide. In these two cases homosexual themed cakes and Trump themed cakes.
---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

Darmik posted...

thanosibe posted...

ImTheMacheteGuy posted...

ToonLinkWithGun posted...

I hope they sue the bigot bakers and put them out of business.

No grounds to do so, they will lose if they try. Keep shitposting though.

If the homosexual couple were discrimminated against then so were these folks. Keep on shit posting though.

Depends. Were the gay couple unable to get a standard wedding cake they'd offer to straight couples?

Or were they unable to get a custom cake made specifically for them?

If we are going to make exceptions, in this case it was the customers who wrong but in this case it was the bakers who were wrong, then there's no basis for any kind of law/policy to protect both parties. Either both the Trump supporters and the homosexual couple were discriminated or they weren't. What was available to them to go elsewhere is irrelevant if we are going to determine in the future what bakeries can do or not do within their business ethics or whether it's all discrimminitory. Both bakeries refused to do something the customer was willing to pay money for them to do. Siding with either party on a case by case basis is a double standard.

It's different than a homosexual couple and/or a Trump supporter going to a mechanic and the mechanic refusing to do work on their car. Because their sexual orientation or political beliefs don't factor into the work he is going to do on their car. In the case of a bakery it's not the same thing. Now whether you think in either case the bakeries moral stance is wrong or not is something only you can decide. But their morals do factor into the messages they are willing to make on a cake.
---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

YoshitoKikuchi posted...

thanosibe posted...

YoshitoKikuchi posted...

No one likes Bahamut ZERO?

Not after equipping it to Quadra Magic with a W-Summons and then the other two members having Mime to defeat the Ruby Weapon, no.

Heh

Before that it was cool af though. :-)
---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

ImTheMacheteGuy posted...

ToonLinkWithGun posted...

I hope they sue the bigot bakers and put them out of business.

No grounds to do so, they will lose if they try. Keep shitposting though.

If the homosexual couple were discrimminated against then so were these folks. Keep on shit posting though.
---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

YoshitoKikuchi posted...

No one likes Bahamut ZERO?

Not after equipping it to Quadra Magic with a W-Summons and then the other two members having Mime to defeat the Ruby Weapon, no.
---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

ShotOJameson posted...

Nomadic View posted...

There is nothing wrong with liberals. Unfortunately liberals get grouped in with the collective of radical left nut jobs.

People want to attack a symbol. People on the right lump all liberals in with groups like Antifa and BLM. People on the left lump all conservatives in with groups like the alt-right and the KKK. They then attack the most extreme wackos and claim that the entire side is aligned with them.

It's identity politics in the worst form.

I see

so everyone just sees the extreme/radical side of each party (idiots) and lumps them in with everyone else that affiliates themselves with that party, and dismisses the the actual good things that they are trying to stand for. Got it.

Most of the time. Because it easier to just lump people together and write them all off as that group than to actually engage people and try to come to an understanding of their point of view and/or political stance. Parisian politics have encouraged Americans to be lazy and just go with their preferred party and write off the others. That keeps Americans distracted and not paying attention to the awful things the government is doing at the expense of it's people. If we are too worried about internet typos and age old email conspiracies, then what attention are we going to give to the policies that are being put in place while we look at the shiny penny?
---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

Women just get better with age. Cate Blanchett, Susanna Thompson, Gillian Anderson, Kate Beckinsale, Sigourney Weaver ...
---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

ChromaticAngel posted...

Monday posted...

thanosibe posted...

sylverlolol posted...

Ving_Rhames posted...

lol Parents who put politics onto their kids are the worst.

That said they shouldn't have a problem with a place refusing to bake a cake for them for any reason, it happened to a couple trying to get a wedding cake made, why can't it happen to anyone else

Uh...the state stepped in and heavily fined the bakers who refused to bake something for the same sex couple. Do you not think the baker here should be fined as well?

Only when it fits a narrative. Otherwise double standards are fine.

This.

Also, nb4"that'stotallydifferentcuzblahblahhatecrime"

The gay wedding cake incident drew fines because the bakers doxxed the couple to local hate groups that had their property vandalized, got all kinds of threats, and had to flee their house.

But hey don't let your bullshit narrative stop you from lying on the internet.

The actions of the bakery outside their refusal to bake the cake are irrelevant to the point of whether any bakery should be able to decide what they do want and not want to do. That's why we have police and state officials to step in when it does get out of hand, which it did in the case of the homosexual couple.

Again, if one bakery shouldn't refuse to do a homosexual themed cake, then why is it okay for these Trump supports not to get a Trump themed cake?

Because all I see here is "Omg they won't make their wedding cake! Bigots! Homophobes!"
"Lol Trumpeters are crying they can't get their orange king on a cake! Lol! USA USA!"

Double standards are the case here. Not homophobia or what presidential candidate people voted for. Unless of course people don't have an agenda to push. But I find that's highly unlikely in both cases.
---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

UnfairRepresent posted...

thanosibe posted...

I had to watch all of FF9's summons just now as its been too long since I played it. And man does FF9 have a lot of long running summons. But is any still longer than FF8's Eden? Where you actually button mash to get a better attack cause thing is so damned long.

Ark is literally 2minutes

I watched all the FF9 summons in one video so I didn't pay attention to the time of Ark alone. But yeah Eden is under 2 minutes. He doesn't start the summons until 30 seconds in on this video and its 2:22 total.


---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

Hades in FF7, with Alexander as a second.
Diablo in FF8 with Cerberus as a second
Odin in FF9 with Bahamut as a second

I had to watch all of FF9's summons just now as its been too long since I played it. And man does FF9 have a lot of long running summons. But is any still longer than FF8's Eden? Where you actually button mash to get a better attack cause thing is so damned long.
---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

gunplagirl posted...

9 years old and already he wants all living creatures on our planet dead.

http://imgur.com/a/sMjSO
---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

Darmik posted...

thanosibe posted...

And it also means not assuming that everyone with the same skin color in "the top of the pecking order" has someone had more advantages than someone whose not simply because of that factor. It goes both ways and perpetuating that everyone of a skin color falls into the stereotypes and preconceived notions and labels that society puts on them is just as regressive as color blindness ignoring difference in races for a multitude of factors.

What it really takes is each individual on the planet treating each individual they encounter as that individual that they are. Stop the generalizations. Stop piting the us vs them and maybe we as a species can move forward. Instead of taking steps back every time we make steps forward. Everyone has to play a part for true unity to happen.

Nobody said that race is the only thing you consider when dealing with other people. It's one of many factors.

While, I agree with you, I must be the only one in this thread misreading the contents as only about race. But whatever, as I said I agree.
---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

Darmik posted...

It's easy to promote color blindness when you're at the top of the pecking order and you're the majority so to speak. That's the biggest flaw.

Accepting others have different circumstances than yourself and recognizing that doesn't contradict your ability to treat people like equals.

And it also means not assuming that everyone with the same skin color in "the top of the pecking order" has someone had more advantages than someone whose not simply because of that factor. It goes both ways and perpetuating that everyone of a skin color falls into the stereotypes and preconceived notions and labels that society puts on them is just as regressive as color blindness ignoring difference in races for a multitude of factors.

What it really takes is each individual on the planet treating each individual they encounter as that individual that they are. Stop the generalizations. Stop piting the us vs them and maybe we as a species can move forward. Instead of taking steps back every time we make steps forward. Everyone has to play a part for true unity to happen.
---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

steveoSEK posted...

thanosibe posted...

steveoSEK posted...

thanosibe posted...

steveoSEK posted...

thanosibe posted...

I'd like to play Warframe since its by the makers of Dark Sector now that I have a Xbox1. But my impression from seeing it on Steam that it is a free to play game. I'd just rather it be a shooter campaign like Dark Sector. But I may still give it a try.

It's awesome. It has a story mode and plenty of single player content.

Awesome. Thanks for responding. This is a must get now.

There is PvP, but the brunt of the game is single player/co op focused. I only ever played with others in the hardest stuff.

Is there a local co-op?

Nah, since everyone has their own character they level up and equip. Each frame has different skills and strengths. There's quite a bit of customization.

Oh so like you can play by yourself the whole game if you want to? The online co-op is just an option?
---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

steveoSEK posted...

thanosibe posted...

steveoSEK posted...

thanosibe posted...

I'd like to play Warframe since its by the makers of Dark Sector now that I have a Xbox1. But my impression from seeing it on Steam that it is a free to play game. I'd just rather it be a shooter campaign like Dark Sector. But I may still give it a try.

It's awesome. It has a story mode and plenty of single player content.

Awesome. Thanks for responding. This is a must get now.

There is PvP, but the brunt of the game is single player/co op focused. I only ever played with others in the hardest stuff.

Is there a local co-op?
---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

darkphoenix181 posted...

Bok_Choi posted...

member when CE could make a topic like

"hey post cats"

and people would just post cats and say lolcat stuff

now if we are like "hey post cats"
someone will be like

"cat pics are a liberal brainwashing tool wake up sheep #maga"

and start shit

apparently cats now represent Nazis thanks to John Oliver

>.<

http://imgur.com/a/eRODg
---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

steveoSEK posted...

thanosibe posted...

I'd like to play Warframe since its by the makers of Dark Sector now that I have a Xbox1. But my impression from seeing it on Steam that it is a free to play game. I'd just rather it be a shooter campaign like Dark Sector. But I may still give it a try.

It's awesome. It has a story mode and plenty of single player content.

Awesome. Thanks for responding. This is a must get now.
---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

I'd like to play Warframe since its by the makers of Dark Sector now that I have a Xbox1. But my impression from seeing it on Steam that it is a free to play game. I'd just rather it be a shooter campaign like Dark Sector. But I may still give it a try.
---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

ssj3vegeta posted...

Mmmmm
---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

YourAlt posted...

thanosibe posted...

YourAlt posted...

The Admiral posted...

Here's how this topic has gone.

"Why doesn't Trump just condemn these people"
He's condemned them many times. Here are videos of multiple instances of him doing so.

"Yeah, but why did he wait so long? Why didn't he condemn them sooner?"
He condemned them long before this incident at Charlottesville. Here's a video as far back as 2000

"Fuck you, I hate Trump!!!"

Oh look, Admiral is here to make himself look bad again.

Your shit posting doesn't negate his point.

"He doesn't need to condemn them now, because he did so in the past"

Lol

I need someone to tell me what to think or not.

Lol.
---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

WalkingLobsters posted...

thanosibe posted...

Don't worry Ashley. I'm coming for you.

CapnMuffin posted...

XD

http://i0.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/facebook/000/016/729/large.jpg

https://m.imgur.com/a/kDpi4
---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

YourAlt posted...

The Admiral posted...

Here's how this topic has gone.

"Why doesn't Trump just condemn these people"
He's condemned them many times. Here are videos of multiple instances of him doing so.

"Yeah, but why did he wait so long? Why didn't he condemn them sooner?"
He condemned them long before this incident at Charlottesville. Here's a video as far back as 2000

"Fuck you, I hate Trump!!!"

Oh look, Admiral is here to make himself look bad again.

Your shit posting doesn't negate his point.
---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

If someone needs to tell you racism is bad .... well I mean you should probably be 5 years old and it's your mother or father telling. And even then at 5 you should recognize that we are all of the same species that equally deserve respect and common curtesy.

If your folks didn't teach this to you as a child, the president saying anything or not isn't going to sway a person. Either you've reached the conclusion as an adult that you will treat people equally without prejuding people or you've made to the choice to do the opposite.
---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

CruelBuffalo posted...

thanosibe posted...

Schwarber posted...

CruelBuffalo posted...

thanosibe posted...

AngelsNAirwav3s posted...

He said if you took people from the 50's and brought them to 2017, they would burn those schools to the ground. But I guess that isn't nearly click baity enough for this article

That's because most of CE doesn't read the articles as already enters threads triggered by the thread title. The definition of baiting.

His co-host Bill Jack said: “We need to burn them down.”

Lmao conservatroll turds getting called out on their laziness

I mean your free to shit post assumptions about me and satisfy your bias but I didn't take a side at all. I merely pointed out that before my post, it was clear people didn't read the article TC posted and went off his thread title to make their posts. Both sides of this political shit posting bait to rile people up. But it's certainly clear your only contribution to this thread is insults.

Except the title is correct. You're the one who shitposted and didn't read it.

Try again. I read it. People went off your thread title and came in with preconceived notions. I didn't even say at any point that your thread title wasn't correct. Both of you are reaching and trying to say I said something I didn't. People not reading articles in the OP before posting is a problem on CE and why this thread started the way it did. You seem to be the one taking it personally.
---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

Don't worry Ashley. I'm coming for you.

CapnMuffin posted...

XD
---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

Schwarber posted...

CruelBuffalo posted...

thanosibe posted...

AngelsNAirwav3s posted...

He said if you took people from the 50's and brought them to 2017, they would burn those schools to the ground. But I guess that isn't nearly click baity enough for this article

That's because most of CE doesn't read the articles as already enters threads triggered by the thread title. The definition of baiting.

His co-host Bill Jack said: “We need to burn them down.”

Lmao conservatroll turds getting called out on their laziness

I mean your free to shit post assumptions about me and satisfy your bias but I didn't take a side at all. I merely pointed out that before my post, it was clear people didn't read the article TC posted and went off his thread title to make their posts. Both sides of this political shit posting bait to rile people up. But it's certainly clear your only contribution to this thread is insults.
---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

AngelsNAirwav3s posted...

He said if you took people from the 50's and brought them to 2017, they would burn those schools to the ground. But I guess that isn't nearly click baity enough for this article

That's because most of CE doesn't read the articles as already enters threads triggered by the thread title. The definition of baiting.
---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

sktgamer_13dude posted...

thanosibe posted...

Because Americans are fooled into thinking if it's not a chain it's automatically a higher quality and therefore feel culture and superior when they pay for overpriced food.

Or maybe you don't know the economic advantages of being part of a larger conglomerate.

Pizza Hut isn't automatically inferior to Mom & Pop's Pizzaria because it's cheaper. Larger companies have more capital and more buying power so they can get the products they need cheaper and at greater quantities.

But it still doesn't mean that Mom & Pop's Pizzaria isn't able to be fairly competitive. I've eaten at local Chinese joints that I've paid $7 for General Tso that lasted me three meals.

I've eaten $8 pizzas from local pizzarias that's worse than Little Ceasars. In the end it's quality all around. Not the price and/or the restaurant name.
---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

Yaridovich posted...

thanosibe posted...

Because Americans are fooled into thinking if it's not a chain it's automatically a higher quality and therefore feel culture and superior when they pay for overpriced food.

Look at this foreign toolbox that's never had mom and pop pizza.

Great assumption. On par for CE though. And absolutely no surprise.

That said I've had good local pizza and I've had absolute shit local pizza. But if people continually pay too much for something willingly than why would a local place not over charge?

Quality is all that matters, not the sign in front of building. But we Americans have become elitist in foods, and especially in pizza for some reason.
---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

Because Americans are fooled into thinking if it's not a chain it's automatically a higher quality and therefore feel culture and superior when they pay for overpriced food.
---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

FF_Redux posted...

glitteringfairy posted...

You gonna bang grannies now bro

ew

Tho there are some great looking 50 year olds.

I agree. Though technically she's just 49.

https://imgur.com/a/AK9Wl

Though she's 59 and still looking good.

https://m.imgur.com/a/Aw9MA

Also vagina is great. I tried anal one time with my wife and neither of us cared to do it again. Also with women the tounge is stronger than the penis.

Edit: To the OP. I'd say it's more likely going to happen than a heterosexual guy helping out a homosexual guy. Women tend to be less "uptight" about sexuality than guys.
---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

MemeDaddy posted...

Tauros posted...

MemeDaddy posted...

How am I being ignorant?

Well for one, you read something on the Internet about a man who died almost 100 years ago, and now think you're the divine judge on how that man actually was.

Nope, you're just another peon nobody that will be forgotten in time, like everyone else.

lmao way to exaggerate

He's not wrong based on your posting in this thread. Your shit posting and opinions are invalid when you have no accomplishments as Ghandi did. But I expect no less from CE tbh.
---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

95% of this thread is the epitome of edgey. Lol guys. Lol
---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

After gastric bypass surgery there are foods that literally can make a person sick. Digestion changes after these surgeries. And eating too much or certain foods can cause nausea and vomiting. It's not something you can have done and just go back to your old eating habits.

I don't know the person in question in the OP but he might find smaller portions more frequently throughout the day are better for his digestion. And as I said before he might also find some foods his body will reject if consumed. If indeed his surgery was gastric bypass.
---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

sylverlolol posted...

Ving_Rhames posted...

lol Parents who put politics onto their kids are the worst.

That said they shouldn't have a problem with a place refusing to bake a cake for them for any reason, it happened to a couple trying to get a wedding cake made, why can't it happen to anyone else

Uh...the state stepped in and heavily fined the bakers who refused to bake something for the same sex couple. Do you not think the baker here should be fined as well?

Only when it fits a narrative. Otherwise double standards are fine.
---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

OpheliaAdenade posted...

thanosibe posted...

OpheliaAdenade posted...

what happens if she's giving you head and she tries to stick a finger up your butt? :u

My wife knows damn well not stick anything in my anus. And I keep my hands and other appendages out of hers.

How do you know you don't like it if you don't try it? :u Not liking it is going to kill u

The anus is not a playground.
---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski