Lurker > StealThisSheen

waterjoe posted...

Lets be REAL honest if these two women weres uper hot instagram models with a million followers each, I bet you dude would have showed off and tried to get their number. Pluse the gym wouldn't have banned them.

This is a dumb post, and you should feel dumb.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


I think there's a bit of a disconnect, here, since in today's day and age, if somebody purposely posts a video on like, TikTok, it legitimately does feel like they're seeking attention, which comes off as malicious, and I think that's what Joey attacks. It feels like if somebody legitimately felt like they were being perved on, their first instinct wouldn't be to... Make a TikTok video out of it?

Obviously, this doesn't apply across the board, but I do get the feeling of... If somebody's first reaction was to make a TikTok video out of something that feels like an incredibly suspect accusation, to begin with... Yeah, it does feel kinda malicious.

And, to be clear, I'm not doubting some women do, legitimately, feel like somebody may be staring at them when they aren't, and mistake something due to past trauma.

I'm strictly speaking about the ones that post some random wide angle shot on Tiktok with the generic voiceover of "omg look at this guy looking at me!" and the guy like vaguely looks in her direction for half a second when talking to somebody in said direction, and it's mostly those videos that I see Joey attack.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


Ehh, I'll push back a bit, here. Maybe I missed some of the earlier Joey Swoll videos, but a lot of the ones I've seen, it was women legitimately trying to make something out of nothing in order to get "clout," since... Instead of actually addressing the issue with the man or with gym personnel, they'd just post the video, going "Look at this guy staring at me!" in a video where it was, conveniently, a wide angle video, where the woman in question was blatantly not actually working out, and instead "stretching" in ways to be looked at, and then they'd more or less try to dox some guy that didn't even look at them. And, yes, Joey Swoll would call them out... But they deserved to be called out, because they were purposely aiming to get internet clout out of attacking somebody innocent.

Now, if earlier videos legitimately were attacking women who legitimately felt they were being perved on, then yes, that's wrong. I just haven't personally seen those videos. I'm mainly just speaking from seeing certain "influencers" who legitimately attempted to get famous from intentionally setting up scenarios where they were "perved on," and when they often didn't work as intended, they just attacked people who didn't even actually look at them.

76-78.

...Okay?

SAlYAN posted...

That said, I'm giving it to the viltrumites. Worst comes to worst, the fight goes to space, or the planet is destroyed. Viltrumites can live in space long enough to survive. Saiyans can't.

This is what I settle on, I think. At the end of the day, they're all planet busters, so... Planets are likely being busted. Viltrumites win the war of attrition, not necessarily because of power, but because they can survive in space longer.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


Can't they... Not do that, at will? And doesn't it blatantly have a weakness of failing if the tail gets cut off? I feel like anybody even near their power level could basically even just accidentally stumble into that weakness.

I've seen this guy before. I like him. He feels like the anti-Andrew Tate.

Dakimakura posted...

They can wear pants but there is only one clothing item. So it would have to be a clothing item and has tops and bottoms built in. Just give it to them as a gift and they will wear it and be fully clothed.

Yeah, but do any do it naturally, without you causing them to?

EDIT: To be clear, I know some of the consistent NPCs do, like Isabelle, Nook, etc. I mean moreso the normal villagers.

...Emulation, I guess?

"Fully clothed?"

So many of them don't wear any pants.

EDIT: Actually, do any wear pants?

It's good until the words start, then it just kinda goes downhill. The "C-E-O!" part especially feels like a rather cringe attempt to force a chant and feels very misplaced.

LordFarquad1312 posted...

StealThisSheen posted...
something a single high class Saiyan

BlueBoy675 posted...
average I mean like your run of the mill Saiyan

I get your point, but those three were also considered "high class" Viltrumites, so it was a fair comparison.

The issue is trying to extrapolate from there.

legendarylemur posted...

But that's not average vs average. They all work off of the whole what doesn't kill you makes you stronger logic, and the average Viltrumite puts themselves in deathly situation much more than the Saiyans do.

Well, this is fair. I guess the issue is that DB showcases more powerful Saiyans more than Invincible showcases particularly strong Viltrumites, so it's hard to judge what the average Saiyan would be. I feel like Drizzt is right in that Saiyans have the overall power edge due to energy projection, but how much that actually matters is up for debate.

Saiyans are definitely stronger than Viltrumites. It took three Viltrumites to destroy an already unstable planet, something a single high class Saiyan can achieve. However, Viltrumites can freely survive in space much longer than Saiyans.

So it'll depend on the specifics.

Godzilla Minus One is definitely a better movie, but oh geez is Godzilla x Kong just mindless fun. And, honestly, the latter is more likely to get my movie ticket. I'd rather watch a good movie at home in comfort, but at a theater, I usually just want loud, bombastic excitement.

Dick Dastardly in the Mean Machine

Chipp Zanuff

This feels like a moment Vyrulisse should just quietly leave CE and never return. I'm not really sure how you top a moment like this.

Vyrulisse posted...

What an ignorant topic.
The Legion is pretty gray in the world of Fallout. You hear about how their controlled lands are thriving and sadly we'll never get to see what Obsidian wanted to show of the Legion. All we see in NV is their war camp and soldiers on a war footing. They wanted to show a bit of Legion homeland but didn't have the time.

...I like how other responses in this topic are "Nobody is talking about that faction," but this response is specifically saying "Well, actually, that faction that owns slaves is pretty gray."

What.

DoesntMatter posted...

nobody means that faction when they say that statement

TC knows that, but TC is also trying to justify their own beliefs.

DoesntMatter posted...

oh shit lol, it worked. thanks for that.

Yeah, it's a "pro tip." Bing doesn't automatically refresh, but a good tell is... Once you get that message, click in the box and/or refresh, because the image is done.

DoesntMatter posted...

okay i'm trying out Bing, but it's taking a loooooooong time. it is thanking me for being patient and telling me generating my image is taking longer than expected. how long does it generally take?

Much, much less time than you think.

Look to the side, see that kinda... Blank box, with a question mark in it, or whatever? Whenever you get that "This is taking longer than expected," click that blank box, to refresh the page. 9 times out of 10, your image is done, and it will appear.

Unlike something dedicated, like Fooocus, Bing doesn't automatically refresh your page, you need to do so. In my experience, the "This is taking longer than expected" is the indicator to say... It's actually done, refresh the page.

Sad_Face posted...

Warren staying in siphoned votes from Bernie as they shared similar demographics despite Bernie being on the winning end. It was so clear that Warren's inclusion sabotaged Bernie that even Trump had to tweet to blame Warren for screwing him over.

Warren didn't "stay in," though. She dropped out mere days after most of the others dropped out, and either the day of, or only a day after, Bloomberg dropped out, and Bloomberg took votes from Biden.

People like to say Warren "sabotaged" Bernie, but... She didn't. She and Bloomberg both stayed in until Super Tuesday, and then dropped out within two days of it, before any other major primaries took place.

EDIT: Super Tuesday was March 3rd. Bloomberg dropped out March 4th, Warren dropped out March 5th. Both dropped out before the next major primary. Thus, this idea that Warren "stayed in" and siphoned votes from Bernie doesn't make sense, since both she and Bloomberg stayed in past Super Tuesday, and while Warren likely took more votes from Bernie than Biden, Bloomberg took more votes from Biden than Bernie.

Spoilers: If the basis of your argument is literally Donald Trump, there are problems with your argument.

For less realistic images, bing.com/create is legitimately very good.

If you want more realistic images with literally no restrictions, you'll want to look into installing Fooocus.

PowerOats posted...

I'm saying the movie mom and dad are actually fine. Its the other characters/ story bits that bring them down

Oh, gotcha.

If you're okay with the Sonic "mom and dad," you'd probably be okay with Wade, in this series. Wade is actually... Well utilized, all things considered. If you don't want the human characters AT ALL, you'll hate him, but if you're okay with them... He's actually a rather fun addition to Knuckles.

hockeybabe89 posted...

Apparently he's just not toxic enough to chase away zoomers from looking at Fandom's ads.

Maybe he should try saying Trump is bad.

Yeah, makes sense. Troll about literal animal murder? Nah, that's fine.

Describe twerking, in text? Hold the phone, that's too much!

Vicious_Dios posted...

Why hate anyone at all?

This message loses meaning when you try to use it to defend far right people calling for violence, like you typically do.

Kurumiee posted...

So I've been working this position for 1 month now.

So basically I called a client about feedback and to review us on a platform, but I messed up and said the wrong things.

Manager called me and my mentor/senior in. I told her I feel like I fudged up big time, but she said that I shouldn't think in this way and that I'm still learning, and that she's just trying to teach me how to handle this specific situation moving forward (because, after all, I did say the wrong things). Then she said I'm a fast learner, and mentor/senior said I'm improving day by day.

I still feel like I fudged up tho, and a bit bad. Should I feel bad about myself?:D

This kind of talk basically means they want you to learn from your mistake, but also, they can't afford to replace you, so they're not really judging you harshly on it at all.

Take them at their word, in this case. They really do want you to just learn from mistakes. Call center-esque jobs have insanely high turnover rates, so it's in their best interest to be honest and try to retain people.

DKBananaSlamma posted...

People can post here while warned now lol.

But idk if the inital suspension status cut off his CE access or not

Suspensions don't, only purgatory.

Politicians are run by the rich people, so....

Frankly, I can name more good politicians than I can rich people, so it appears obvious, to me, which the problem actually is.

What's hilarious is that JasonSehorn posted "Who posted" BEFORE they blocked me, because I saw it.

RiKuToTheMiGhtY posted...

A woman cheating on her husband with her ex in a movie about sports romance is pretty cringe. Mind you I only saw the trailer before Godzilla x Kong The New Empire.

Yes, we get it. You have trouble comprehending things and jump to certain preconceived notions. We already know your gig.

PowerOats posted...

The only humans we need in this Sonic Universe is Sonics Mom&Dad

...I don't think Sonic's mom and dad have literally ever been human, in any Sonic universe?

JasonSehorn posted...

Warned shoulda been suspended

Nah, I buy their explanation. They certainly don't have an iffy post history. I just feel like blaming CE isn't the answer, here, since "Poor X" is a known meme that is 99% used to devalue the person, and so more tact needs to be used, because it obviously elicits a certain response.

Meanwhile, you certainly have a much more questionable history...

sfcalimari posted...

Yeah, Jesus Christ, classic CE.

If they're charging her with battery when they're the ones beating her, it makes no sense. It's like they're saying that she assaulted the concrete with her head, or that she assaulted their hands when they wrestled her to the ground. It's like when people say that Russian dissidents attacked a 3rd story window or assaulted some bullets with their head, they're not supporting Putin, they're making fun of the absurdity of oppression.

I appreciate the explanation, but I feel like the fact that multiple people took what you said as meaning the traditional meme meaning suggests you worded it incredibly poorly, and is not a "classic CE" scenario.

Hey guys.

Don't judge me for my shame of posting on CE too much, please. I went down a road, let's leave it at that.

havean776 posted...

He knows.

I was trying to give him the benefit of the doubt. Joke's on me, I guess.

thronedfire2 posted...

what? that would be the most ridiculous interpretation ever. concrete obviously has no feelings and can't suffer.

Which is precisely why it's a meme. The point is "That poor inanimate object/concept/whatever," which is devaluing the life of the person in question. That's why it's typically used against awful people, and why it caused confusion in this topic.

Seems funny to me that people immediately get blasted for "hornyposting," here, but Ghostfaceleaks somehow is getting away with incredibly blatant trolling about literal animal abuse, in this very topic.

DementedDurian posted...

I mean, my obsession over succubi wasn't about sex itself, but the fact they were demons that could take a female guise, according to their mythos.

As someone who so wants to be female, that was a powerful draw.

Obsession over sex is just weird. It feels impersonal and makes me wonder about people sometimes.

Yeah, I wouldn't call you "creepy." You've got your own thing going on, whether I agree with it or not, and that's cool. FortuneCookie made it a point to go out of his way to hate on things that weren't "sexy" enough for him, and it got very weird.

Humble_Novice posted...

I only remember them as a Biden hater.

They were incredibly obsessed with "censorship." Complaining about TMNT not having "Hot April," complaining about Xmen 97 not having "big butt Rogue," etc. and so on.

It got very creepy, and it's what I know them most for.

This is the least surprising thing ever. They were absolutely obsessed with horny, to the point of repeatedly badmouthing things they didn't even watch (such as the new TMNT movie) because it did away with things like "Hot April" that they wanted. It got pretty gross.

radical_rhino posted...

No ones head was slammed into concrete. Watch the video.

Her head is definitely slammed into the concrete twice, once when he takes her down, and once when the second cop jumps on her.

Simp harder.

thronedfire2 posted...

he's saying aww poor concrete because she's being charged for her head assaulting a sidewalk

seemed rather obvious

That's not obvious at all, since she's being charged for assaulting a police officer, which she didn't do.

When somebody says "That poor concrete," the obvious reaction is going to be "This person is saying the concrete suffered from being touched by X," since that's how that comment is typically used.

I'm not doubting that was the intention, but... Yikes, you gotta do it a lot better than that.

thronedfire2 posted...

can you all really not detect the sarcasm in post #2?

no wonder people here get suspended for fucking jokes

...What is the sarcasm in post #2? Like, I've tried reading it with sarcasm, and I can't figure it out.

Yeah, I've started watching it, and I actually enjoy it.

Granted, the trailers didn't repulse me, I kinda liked the idea of Knuckles wanting to create a "warrior" out of the "dumb funny human friend" who clearly isn't a warrior.

Yes, I absolutely would like the Sonic movies to deviate further from the human aspect and more into the actual... Sonic aspect, but for what they are... Screw it, they're not bad.

sfcalimari posted...

That poor concrete.

Like, I've gotta double post, here.

In a disturbing video captured by CNN, Professor Caroline Fohlin approached several police officers as they wrestled one protester to the ground, forcefully shoving their head into the concrete sidewalk. Oh my God, what are you doing? Fohlin asked, horrified.
Fohlin yelled at the officers to get away from the student. She leaned down closer to the student, but did not touch them, or any of the officers.
One cop raced up to her, grabbing her wrists. Get on the fucking ground, he yelled, pulling her away from the student. Get on the ground, I said, he repeated.
Fohlin opened her mouth to protest as the officer kept his grip locked on her wrist. Do not, Im a ... she said, before the cop violently flipped her onto the ground, smashing her head into the sidewalk.

This is what you're saying "That poor concrete" to. What the fuck?

sfcalimari posted...

That poor concrete.

...I'm gonna ask for explanation on this post, because it seems in incredibly poor taste, on the surface.