Lurker > StealThisSheen

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


You're missing the context that TC previously complained about the other thing being patched out, meaning they're being dishonest with this topic. They're being obtuse, on purpose.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


Here's the context:

Stellar Blade patched out certain things, such as a graffiti/sign placement that, effectively, spelled out an offensive term.

Given TC's history, including complaining about that instance being patched out, it makes it clear that they're now mocking said thing being patched out, by making this topic about a randomly generated password.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


The gameplay made me play the sequels, and I absolutely loved them. To this day, the original is the only one I've only completed once and have no desire to ever complete again, in LARGE part because of how it handles things after that chapter.

Half of the game is incredible.

Then you basically have to play the same game four more times.

And then you get to a fantastic ending.

But oh god is getting to that ending a real drag.

What an utter misstep.

MagiMarthKoopa posted...

They should have patched that one out when they did Hard R

I tried to search Twitter to see if anyone was talking about it but zero results?

strange

...Are you really so mad about them patching stuff out that you thought this topic was worth making? So weird.

Yeah, he absolutely deserves to be punished. He threw the ball, missed his target... A fan POLITELY tossed the ball back, and he threw the ball AT the fan who tossed it back.

Fuck that noise.

divot1338 posted...

Isnt an emotional support animal supposed to stay with you?

Presumedly, the hotel/BnB/whatever didn't allow such an animal to be inside, and it was reported Wally was placed in a fenced in area outside on the property, where he couldn't have escaped on his own. Thus, the thought is somebody took him out of that area while the owner was inside. It's currently being reported that "pranksters" effectively stole the animal from the enclosure and left it outside of somebody's property, and that person called animal control, because, well... They saw an alligator on their property.

The person who called animal control is, reportedly, being extremely cooperative. It's the government animal control agency that is apparently refusing to help. Likely because they killed the animal, instead of relocating it, like they say they do, and just don't want to admit it.

boomgetchopped3 posted...

Is it just me or is this happening more often?

It's not necessarily happening more often, as much as it's being reported more often. Previously, there was a stigma that made boys/men less likely to report being sexually assaulted/harassed/whatever by women, but that stigma is slowly going away, which means such instances are being reported much more often than they used to be.

I don't, personally, but I get people that do. If they think it's too dangerous to go out, themselves, but delivery services have drivers who decide to drive, regardless... Why not use the service? It's not like you're making them do it. Door Dash isn't some kind of contract where you MUST do deliveries on a certain day or point of time. But, yes, you should tip well in such a scenario.

Women Become Teachers Because It's a Kink (tm)

I wish this was a joke, and obviously I don't mean ALL, or even most, but... Certain ones absolutely are, at this point.

TheSavageDragon posted...

Your experience doesn't stack up to Allen straight up saying the meme was now allowed though. I remember it clearly because I found it amusing that it was now allowed seeing as I got banned for it a little while before. Should be somewhere around 2011-2012 that the change happened as I got hit for it in 2010 IIRC.
And I'm talking about the specific "I am 12 and what is this" meme, not similar posts and such.

KookyCouture posted...

It has been allowed under Allen's reign due to it's meme status, so was claiming to be ridiculously underaged like stating you were a baby or something, I guess Fandom are not screwing around with any of that though

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


I stand corrected. I guess maybe I didn't notice it because it was mainly allowed when it was like, BLATANTLY obvious somebody was posting a dumb meme, whereas the edge cases still got modded more often than not.

Yeah, given TC's history, this is either absolutely bait, or they're just a terrible person who shouldn't own animals, to begin with.

TheSavageDragon posted...

No, not exactly. "I am 12 and what is this" is what I got hit for and that was allowed about a year after I got banned for it. Now it's not allowed again.

See, in my experience, this isn't true. I don't think it's ever actually been allowed, because I'd say I've probably seen somebody get banned for it almost on an average of atleast once per year, the entire time I've been here. Like I said, I've seen people make such posts and get away with it, in certain situations, such as being on a smaller board where nobody would mark them, or being in a busier topic where it got overlooked.

EDIT: Unless you're referring to being able to get it overturned, but I also feel like that's always been the case, and the ones that didn't get it overturned just weren't willing to try, or put in the effort to do so, likely since they probably already had an alt, anyway.

TheSavageDragon posted...

Can confirm, did get a ban for this until I got it overturned by showing Allen my ID >_>

Yep. I've been coming to GameFAQs since leading up to release of Sonic Adventure 2, which brought me to GameFAQs to begin with, and I've always seen people get banned for such a thing, unless they proved otherwise, the entire time I've been here.

Trumble posted...

It wasn't the case for a while. Actually being underage or plausible claims of it would get you blocked (but with a chance to restore your account by proving your age); but clear jokes were fine. Now anything is an immediate ban with no opportunity to reverse it.

This is not true, it's literally always been bannable. I've seen people get banned over it for over 20 years. If you made such a joke and didn't get banned, you were just lucky and nobody actually marked it.

Evening_Dragon posted...

You make it sound like people are being forced into the bar or something

They're not, but they should also be able to freely enjoy a bar without, you know, having to give up literally their one lifeline to easy help/safety. There's a reason this is not a common thing.

EDIT:
User Info: Evening_Dragon

1. Elite
2. User Since: Sep 2011
3. Karma: 726

Oh, wait. Now I get it.

No, this sounds incredibly dumb. This isn't a concert, where phones can actually hurt other people's enjoyment.

Spoilers: If somebody would rather be on their phone than actually converse with you, the problem is you, not the phone.

Literally taking away somebody's ability to call for help/reach assistance to leave a situation in a literal bar is just... Crazy.

Nah, it should absolutely be a felony. We absolutely need to punish corporations more, yes, but that doesn't mean we need to lessen the penalty on other people willingly doing it, too.

GUNTHER posted...

I don't understand why grapefruit is getting a bad rep here. It's a super fruit that should be part of a balanced diet.

I mean, there are so many other super fruits to choose from. Grapefruit being the only one that literally can make your medication just... Not work, and/or kill your liver, and/or other things, is a glaring point against it.

Like, it's crazy. If you take thyroid medication, like I used as an example, since it's fairly common? You can literally drink alcohol with no concerns whatsoever, but... Grapefruit/grapefruit juice/etc.? If you have any considerable amount at all, it literally just... Makes your medication not work. It's insane.

chaos_knight posted...

Funny thing is that large spiders are usually less deadly. It's the tiny ones you should worry about

Yes, but tiny spiders typically run from you, while large spiders run at you because what the fuck, life needs nightmare fuel, apparently.

Listen, anything with more than six legs is just unnatural and immediately creepy. Grasshoppers/crickets? You annoying as fuck, but you fine, otherwise. Spiders? Fuck you, stay away. Millipedes/centipedes? Truly, the devil has done work.

_____Cait posted...

Exactly. It didnt fit them. Maybe a plot about Pam getting fired, Jims parents getting sick and needing help, anything other than hey jim and pam suddenly dont communicate properly when they were the best at it happened

This is the takeaway.

Jim/Pam drama, itself, is not a bad idea. But they picked drama that just... Didn't make sense, and that was the problem.

I feel like they could have easily just done without all of that, because the Jim/Daryl stuff alone was enough to sell that storyline. They could have just as easily had Jim/Pam be as happy as Jim/Pam ever were, and it still would have been a fun storyline that set up for good jokes.

Pretty sad that horny posting topics immediately get dealt with, but something like this is left alone, despite it being such a blatant troll topic.

I fucking love you, Guns Akimbo.

Now, to be fair, I do like grapefruit, and especially grapefruit flavoring. Of sodas, I love Squirt, for example. That said, I'm trying to look at this big picture. There's no fruit that has more negative interactions with common medications than grapefruit, so for that reason, I've gotta pick it.

Grapefruit is the clear answer. Grapefruit and Pear are the fruits least used as flavoring for other things, but I've gotta give it to grapefruit as the "go away" fruit, since even if you don't normally like fruit, canned pears in that sugary syrup are really tasty, whereas grapefruit is the single fruit that has the most negative interactions with rather common medications. For example, have thyroid issues? Your thyroid medication will specifically tell you not to eat grapefruit.

Oakland510_ posted...

Damn my bad, the pizza was $22.36, not $24.99. Also the app's coupons didn't show any prices that post #5 and 6 showed. I didn't bother showing the rest of the coupons cause they were for more than 1 pizza but still, none of the coupons on my app had great deals like the deals in post 5 and 6

https://imgur.com/a/288Kh99

https://i.imgur.com/zYYbpBr.jpeg

...So, a large specialty medium is somehow more than a 2 topping large + loaded tots, and the same as a 3 topping large and a 2 topping x-large? That makes no sense whatsoever. Where do you live? I'm also confused how you somehow got a medium one topping pizza to cost more than the medium specialty.

EDIT: Google says the $6.99 and $7.99 deals are nationwide, so I'm not sure how you aren't seeing them.

Oakland510_ posted...

then I go to Domino's app and see a medium, one topping pizza for $24 then I post it here

Prove it. There is no way a ONE topping medium pizza costs $24, even at full menu price.

Post a screenshot.

Brianfellow posted...

https://youtu.be/mRkESFRFE9Q?si=0yZz7qJGvwTiluD7

Good to see him enjoying himself.

Shut the fuck up.

Gobstoppers12 posted...

I've never even seen an extra large pizza for $25 what the fuck toppings are you getting bro

Edit: I realize now that this was the bait, and we all fell for it. I'm usually better at perceiving this type of thing, but I'm tired.

Out of curiosity, I looked into TC's post history, and 95% of it is them posting topics that are basically "Post pictures of Asian girls with big boobs please"

This sure is... Something.

Yeah, I'm very confused.

If a medium pizza was $8 back then, it's actually a dollar cheaper, now, even. Yes, you've gotta use coupons/promo codes/whatever, but said promo codes are... Literally on the website, and they basically throw them in your face when you go to order. Pizza appears to be one of the few things that really hasn't gone up in price much, all things considered.

Oakland510_ posted...

These days I think it's $24.99.

Even at menu price with literally no discounts, it's nowhere near $24.99. Where did you even get this?

Like, I just checked. I went medium pizza, pan crust, five toppings, extra cheese, literally no coupons, and it's still only $22.99. I basically made the pizza as expensive as I reasonably could, and I still didn't hit $24.99.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


Right, but in a funny way. Scott's Tots is just supposed to be cringey in general. You're never really meant to laugh. It's two different styles of cringe.

EDIT: Now, to be fair, dinner party does kinda straddle the two. There are moments you're supposed to legitimately just cringe, but it's interspersed with moments where you're supposed to laugh, such as when Michael is showing off his TV. Scott's Tots is pretty much... You're meant to cringe the entire time.

Scott's Tots, definitely. It's the only one that, legitimately, causes you to cringe, by design. The others only cause "cringe" based on how you react to the actual scenario, whereas Scott's Tots is legitimately designed that way, and to a damn good effect.

WingsOfGood posted...

You have them in your house? They will leave little poo pellets. I had one get in somehow and had to get him to come out of hiding. Tried to catch him in a plastic tupperware thing but he got through a tiny hole into my couch pillows. Luckily moving them around he jumped on my pants so I just walked outside and got him off.

Nah, they're too big to get in the house. They like to live around the back wall between properties, since they can climb it and sun themselves. They basically patrol the perimeter, though, since I stopped putting out scorpion traps because baby lizards were getting trapped in them. Only once did a lizard ever actually get in the house, and it was a tiny baby that must have ran in when the door was open. It ran underneath a large box containing a shelf that I tried to move so it could be caught, and... It tried to run to stay under the box, and basically got itself crushed.

I legit felt bad about it for a few minutes.

Aah, yes, here we go. Here's a previous article referencing him, he really is quite a staple in the community:

https://people.com/lemonade-stand-raises-money-for-man-who-lost-home-in-maui-wildfire-7643093

008Zulu posted...

$150?! How much was he charging per glass?

You've gotta figure he starts out with money to begin with, whether from his parents or previous days, in order to make change. From there, the article does say he's become a "staple," which suggests he probably gets a lot of customers. With all of that in mind, $150 isn't really all that unreasonable.

WingsOfGood posted...

They will protect you from other bugs. Actually if you see the big spider it probably means you got other bugs or it wouldn't be there.

In Nevada, we've got lizards that eat the bugs, including big spiders, and they're much less creepy.

Go lizards. You the real ones.

I live in Nevada, so I'm worried as fuck about big spiders

But also I pay for monthly "gtfo bugs" pest control, and I do live in the middle of a built up gated community, so I'm probably very unlikely to actually deal with anything.

Still doesn't stop the fear.

electricbugs2 posted...

As much as I love the optimism, I dont think the old people going away is going to change much. Look at a lot of the GOP ages.

Lauren Boebert, Anna Paulina Luna and Katie Britt would all be soccer moms if they werent politicians.

And while hes gone now Madison Cawthorn is younger than me and Im not even in my mid thirties yet.

I used to think the same thing when I was a teenager in high school civics. Once all the old people pass away far right politics will die. But more and more young people have embraced hardcore conservatism and far right politics.

That doesnt mean people shouldnt fight for better and more accountable government, but the whole less old people means more leftist politics has always been a myth.

To be clear, I'm not talking about Republicans. I'm speaking purely about the left.

I've long since accepted "Republican" is a disease that has no cure in sight.

I do have (misplaced?) hope that, as the left starts to age out and get replaced by younger people, we actually will be able to start to, viably, move further left, so that Joe Biden doesn't have to be the best we can achieve.

mybbqrules posted...

Oh wow, I was off by 14 whole dollars? How egregious of me to use mild hyperbole.

...I mean, yes, being off by over 3x as much is rather egregious.

dhampire1 posted...

No I read it a few times years ago. Wiig hated her trying to steal every scene, Im sure its easy to find. I think it was reported on a bit.
like if you watch the movie you see it. The stars look completely miserable at times when they shouldnt be and then in more serious moments and scenes Kate is in the background or around doing ridiculous stuff when her character has nothing to do with the scene,
they improvised lots of the movie so she was like just showing up and butting in times she never was supposed to.

I feel like you read too far into things. Her character was supposed to be an exaggerated version of Egon, aka the "quirky" one, which is why she was always doing ridiculous stuff in the background. All of the main characters played incredibly exaggerated references to the Ghostbusters from the main movies.

MorbidFaithless posted...

Love their stuff. Love absurdist humor.

That's the term I was looking for! Yes, thank you. Sometimes, I just love absurdist humor.

One of my all time favorite skits was when they got Zoe Kravitz a cat because she played Catwoman, and they keep losing it. And it's just... So fucking stupid, but I love the hell out of it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kb60HrggbeQ

dhampire1 posted...

She does other things as well.
but if you ever read about the making of Ghostbusters, the girl one, it was her trying to get all the attention and one up everyone acting more and more absurd and steal all the spotlight which made main leads hate working on the movie and miserable.
if you watch the movie knowing that in advance you can see it every other scene about

This literally doesn't make sense, since a large part of the cast (three of the four Ghostbusters) were... Literally SNL people. Kate McKinnon, Leslie Jones, and Kristen Wiig were all from SNL. Do you have a source for this?

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


Yeah. It's not that Biden is a Republican, it's that... Unfortunately, Biden is about as far left as the current Democratic party will accept. Yes, we want more. Yes, we should strive for more. Unfortunately, "more" won't win an election, because the Democratic party still has a lot of old voters that will refuse further left.

We want better. We SHOULD want better. We need to work for better. However, unfortunately, where we're at right now... "Better" can't win elections. We have to make due with the best option (Biden, unfortunately), until we can actually make real changes in politics.

And, listen, maybe I'll get modded for this, I don't know, but... We won't truly be able to get better until older people... Stop being able to vote.

dhampire1 posted...

Shes someone whom always wants attention and the spotlight. When she goes back people cheer snd she gets praise. She gets exactly what she wants

She wants attention so much that she... Appears on SNL, about once every several months...? If it was truly about attention, wouldn't she still be on the cast so that she could appear every week?

ShadowMan033 posted...

Their movie was a solid 6/10. Just stupid turn your brain off humor with funny hit you out of nowhere dialogue

Yep, and that's exactly what I wanted out of it. I didn't care for a "good" movie, a logical plot, etc. and so on. I just wanted bare minimum "turn your brain off, giggle and laugh" humor, and it delivered, just like their skits.

Sometimes, it's nice to have that, once a week, which is why I appreciate their skits so much.

Mecha_Sonic posted...

well someone else (not me) used the word "spectrum", and a spectrum literally has a furthest left and a furthest right on it, like the visible spectrum

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/f/fdab57b3.jpg

when i hear someone say they want someone who's "truly left", i have to wonder what that means, because it's a very fudgy terminology

like your concept of a politician who's "truly left" might be AOC, but the next poster's concept of a politician who's "truly left" could be like, mao zedong, cultural revolution stuff

so it seems like a pretty bad yard stick that's different for everyone

While it's true that spectrums are finite, in that they have ends, spectrums can also change over time, so I'm not sure that actually refutes anything. It feels like you're taking things very literally in order to post dishonestly.

While we're on the subject of SNL, while the majority of the show can be incredibly hit or miss, am I the only one that absolutely loves the Please Don't Destroy stuff? I know it's silly, but, dammit, sometimes I just want silly humor.