Lurker > StealThisSheen

MEGAsoldier posted...

If you could maybe bold the insult in my post I would really appreciate it because I am just not finding it.

The "I didn't technically insult you, I just had a crybaby fit over you not agreeing with me" defense doesn't really work, given your posts in this topic.

MEGAsoldier posted...

Why do you think I was upset? Did I ever insult anyone? Flame anyone? Call anyone names? Tell them to shut up, or fuck off, stop posting?

Yes:

MEGAsoldier posted...

??? So basically just because I agreed with the opinion of a person you don't agree with, I can go fuck myself? Even if it is AGREEING with someone else on their opinion, I should go through the topic and make sure that opinion is the majority before I agree with it right? Man it would be terrible I happen to give an opinion StealThisSheen doesn't agree with it! And while we are at it, fuck that other guy for having the audacity to give that opinion for me to agree with it in the first place! Doesn't he know that wasn't the majority opinion, and he is just being a negative nancy now?

This is, blatantly, a post attempting to insult me, simply because I disagreed with you. Thus, you are, certifiably, having a melty.

Revelation34 posted...

That would belong to the original poster then since they were the one who posted the original negative opinion.

Nah, it'd also belong to the person who openly agreed with them, and is now getting upset on their behalf.

MEGAsoldier posted...

I would genuinely love to know what your prereqs are for when you go to certify something as a melty or not, considering those very loose prereqs were the point of my very first post in the first place.

You were upset people disagreed with your assertion, initially.

You have, since, gotten EXTREMELY more upset, as evident by your previous, almost nonsensical, post.

Thus, you aren't just having a melty, you're having a certifiable melty.

AceMos posted...

what does this mean

Previously, Panera Bread was suing to stop Mexican restaurants from opening up in food courts where they had locations, taking advantage of antiquated "sandwich" laws. This ruling, which rules tacos and burritos as "sandwiches," allows the Mexican restaurants to have shops in said food courts, and basically stops Panera Bread from attempting to sue "non-sandwich" shops from opening.

The tl;dr was that Panera Bread felt they had enough of a successful stake in being a sandwich shop that they were taking advantage of old laws to stop "non-sandwich" food shops from opening in food courts/etc. where they had locations, so that they would have no competition. This ruling takes away their power to sue.

MEGAsoldier posted...

??? So basically just because I agreed with the opinion of a person you don't agree with, I can go fuck myself? Even if it is AGREEING with someone else on their opinion, I should go through the topic and make sure that opinion is the majority before I agree with it right? Man it would be terrible I happen to give an opinion StealThisSheen doesn't agree with it! And while we are at it, fuck that other guy for having the audacity to give that opinion for me to agree with it in the first place! Doesn't he know that wasn't the majority opinion, and he is just being a negative nancy now?

See? This is, certifiably, a melty.

MEGAsoldier posted...

I don't understand how that post did not answer your question. I am not so delusional that I believe making posts on current events is going to serve ANY sort of meaningful purpose past "Human beings giving their opinions like human beings do". This includes my posts.

You do realize that my first post on this subject in this topic was me quoting and AGREEING with someone else that she wasn't having a meltdown, and then every single post after that has been me replying to someone that is quoting me to tell me my opinion is wrong right?

...That literally doesn't change my question/post, at all. Why did you feel the need to agree with them, which is a negative reaction to a thread, instead of just... Letting opinions be, as you're now attempting to argue? By taking and/or agreeing with a negative reaction to opinions, you were, quite literally, STARTING the argument. Thus, I ask: Why? Why did you feel the need to start and/or support an argument against people whose opinions were, simply, "She's having a melty?"

Some context is that businesses like Panera Bread specifically sued to stop places like Mexican restaurants from opening in food courts/etc. where they had Panera Bread locations, by taking advantage of, quite literally, antiquated "sandwich laws."

So this is absolutely a win.

Based on the details of this case, it's absolutely a win that tacos and burritos are considered a "sandwich," so I support this 100%.

Diceheist posted...

Like imagine an alternate universe where Trump's election denialism was somehow proven credible. That would not be good.

...Wait, what? How did we get to this point from "X's wife literally liked posts that called her a Nazi, and that's bad, no matter whether she was 'trolling' or not."

I never minded the MP3s being bigger, granted I did love downloading video game music in better, smaller formats. The main thing I remember loving Winamp for was the customization. The skins, the... Visuals? I don't know what you call them, that window you could open up where it did those visuals, like waves and circles and shit along with the music. Young me loved that.

MEGAsoldier posted...

And this is EXACTLY what I am talking about. You guys read ANYTHING that leans even SLIGHTLY negative and you guys claim that person is "upset" or "having a melty". I am literally just having a conversation on a dead message board lol

All we said was "She's having a melt down."

That's it. That's all.

You, personally, decided to be upset by that, and tried to argue with us.

Instead of just letting us have our opinion, you decided to try to argue that we're wrong.

Why?

MEGAsoldier posted...

I can't have an opinion too? I am just not allowed to express my opinion too? I can't reply to all these people quoting me with their opinion, with an opinion of my own?

No, but we're also allowed to react to your opinion with our own when your only reasoning appears to be "She's a billionaire so she can't possibly actually be having a melty and I appear to be upset that you're saying she is."

We said she's having a melty. You said she isn't. You're now, apparently, upset that we're arguing why we think she is, in response to you.

MEGAsoldier posted...

You gave your opinion as to why you believe it is a meltdown, and I gave my opinion as to why I don't think this should be classified as a "melty". What is confusing to you about that? Are differing opinions to yours really so foreign to you that you can't comprehend that they do, in fact, exist?

I'm asking why you appear to be so upset by people calling it a melty that you're going full force into trying to argue it isn't one, instead of just letting them have their opinion.

Holy shit, I haven't used Winamp in like, 20 years. I didn't know it still existed.

You don't have to be literally "breaking keyboards" mad to be having a melty. Posting a clearly rambling, incoherent post/Tweet/whatever, specifically because you're too bothered to actually make sense, is also "having a melty," so I have literally no idea what you're trying to argue.

-ZIO- posted...

But it's a non-issue.

It's not, though. That's the entire point. Nazis are terrible people, and it's an insanely emotionally charged subject, and so even the act of purposely trolling people by pretending to be a Nazi is an absolutely horrible thing to do, and I'm confused why you refuse to accept that.

ssb_yunglink2 posted...

As ive been repeating, BOTH THINGS CAN BE TRUE AT ONCE

Keffals shit should not minimize Mutas wife posting this trash, and mutas wife shouldnt minimize what Keffals is rightly being called out for.

Both of these can be condemned and neither needs to be pushed aside.

This. It doesn't have to be either or. Keffals being worse can be true, and what Muta's wife did being trash can ALSO be true. There's no reason to defend the latter.

-ZIO- posted...

Oh I don't think it's good. I'm just of the mind that this is a non-issue.

I think the issue is that you're just readily taking her word for it that she was "just trolling," when... It takes a terrible person to troll about something like that as an adult, anyway, and that's even if you fully believe that she really was just trolling. Like, we're not debating Keffals or whoever, we're debating this thing that actually happened, and there's not really a good excuse for it.

I'm sure Keffals actually is worse, but I'm not comparing people I don't know. I'm just looking at this action, and, well... It's a terrible action.

-ZIO- posted...

In an online space where no one is getting hurt? Not really.

I wouldn't do it today since I'm a leftist, but when I was all up in the 4Chan space back 15 years ago, I absolutely did the same.

I feel like your judgment is clouded by bias. Especially today, trolling by pretending to be a Nazi isn't "Haha funny," it's stupid and terrible, and takes a rather uniquely terrible person to do it. This excuse would fly for like, a 12 year old, not an adult.

-ZIO- posted...

To be edgy. Spark flames. Get people like TC riled up for no reason because she knows it's make people mad. You know. Trolling. Deliberately provoking users to react negatively because it's funny to her it is even a conversation and entertaining to see people lose their fucking minds over it.

...I mean, if your idea of fun is making people mad by pretending to be a Nazi, uh... That's not much better.

-ZIO- posted...

Oh I know.

I just wanted to post here to give Mutahar a chance to defend himself from some randos digging into stupid shit to discredit him.

By all means, I'm sure this other person really did just have people dig shit up to try to discredit Mutahar.

That said, my stance is that... His wife actually did do what she was said to have done, and so I'm just sitting here trying to make sense of... Why, and what could a possible explanation be? Like, even when trolling, or being "edgy," or whatever... Why would you literally like/whatever a post... Calling you a Nazi? More than once, to boot?

I have no idea who Mutahar even is, so I'm not making any judgments on him at all. I'm speaking merely about what his wife did.

ShineboxPhil posted...

Just to let you know AceMos has a history jumping the gun with topics by using less than ideal sources.

Absolutely.

But in this case, there's actual video proof.

-ZIO- posted...

Well congratulations, you have just found out what Trolling is. I know it's banned here on GameFAQs, so this concept is new for some of you.

...What? Are you saying she was trolling by... Liking posts that call her a Nazi, and Aryan?

Depends on the context.

I'll say folk music, but I'll also say "fokes" when referring to like, people.

-ZIO- posted...

Mutahar reponds about the alleged accusations that his wifey is a nazi.

https://youtu.be/ewD7Azgc2uE?si=8ZdewqvZ4VHR6U95

He condemns nazis. Also says he comes from an era of 4chan when edgy comments and the like were funny. So he's prone to be edgy along with his wife but has worked to reduce that behavior. Neither of them actually believe in all that.

This was a hate campaign made to discredit Mutahar for making a video about Keffals. As most sane individuals would have known from the beginning. You fell for the bait, TC.

Delete this slanderous topic.

To be fair, the video in the TP literally does show that she liked/retweeted/whatever those Tweets, so that part isn't false. And, well... It seems like it's very hard to explain that away.

SauI_Goodman posted...

Who was involved lol
Was it fanni

AOC said it to MTG after the first started going off the rails again.

ScazarMeltex posted...

Just start marking it.

This. It's just a dumb troll gimmick.

Nah

Taco Bell isn't cheap, but it's still comparatively one of the cheapest.

IdiotMachine posted...

The ones that have nothing to lose? Yea. I honestly believe those who are living in tents/extreme poverty are there mostly because they choose to live that way or because of mental instability. Statistics do show these areas do have higher crime rates, so it isnt surprising that I want to avoid them.

Holy shit

IdiotMachine posted...

Economic backgrounds I am also slightly, as in I dont think its a good idea to have someone of extreme poverty be good with hanging out with your average Joe.

...Why?

Diceheist posted...

Her words are being twisted into something she didn't mean by MAGAs labeling Biden a child molestor or pulling a Heavy_D and going "who knows what else he did."

The articles didn't twist anything.

...Yes, that's what I said. Are you suddenly pretending that you didn't run into the topic and do the same thing?

Daughter: "My words are being twisted to mean something I didn't mean."
MAGA on CE: "Nope, we know better than she does."

Revelation34 posted...

Read my post again. He made the age up.

Didn't actually read the entire topic, did you?

Heineken14 posted...

I've seen him post back in the 261 days.

invertedlegdrop? Yeah, he was a regular MAGA troll. I'm pretty sure he was a blatant alt of somebody else, but I couldn't tell you who, anymore.

CrimsonGear80 posted...

well at the very least he is barred from CE now.

Only if he gets purg.

...Which is likely, given his history.

Whiterun_Guard_ posted...

nothing to indicate that it wasnt

User Info: Whiterun_Guard_

1. Veteran
2. User Since: Jan 2016
3. Karma: 136

Oh boy.

God_of_6strings posted...

Make me.

I mean you literally just cried about this board sucking, so why would you want to be here? Have nothing else to do with your life?

LeoRavus posted...

lol she got fired over that. You'd think chick fil a would turn the other cheek.

Apparently she didn't actually get fired, according to her.

And I only know this because I Googled her thanks to TC bringing her up.

God_of_6strings posted...

Jesus Christ this board sucks.

You're welcome to not post here.

BucketCat posted...

the only time i see her get brought up anymore is by people complaining that she gets brought up too much lol

This. I've literally never heard of her before this topic, and I watch stupid shit on Youtube all the time because I get drunk and bored.

CRON posted...

Except she's not and after a quick YouTube it turns out her entire gimmick is making stupid faces. The fact that the person's phone was already out at the Chic Fil A means it's all some stupid shit for Tik Tok clout

Shame and embarrassment need to become a more integral part of society imo

You're right.

We should shame people like you, who got so upset over such a silly, dumb little thing, and you should feel intense amounts of embarrassment.

User Info: God_of_6strings

1. Elite
2. User Since: Aug 2022
3. Karma: 550
4. Active Posts: 10

I'm sure this topic was posted in good faith.

Thermador446 posted...

Yeah, blame the guy doing a 2 man job by himself instead of the corporation.

...Why not both?

The corporation being bad doesn't mean the worker should also be bad. That doesn't hurt the corporation, it only hurts the people receiving the packages.

This seems like a good thing, though?

Guide posted...

Ehhh. I'll go out on a limb and say no one would care if it was just socks, and we can't be sure it wasn't

We can't be sure it is, either. That's the entire point. The delivery driver has no idea what's in the boxes, and thus he should be treating every single one as if it's breakable, instead of treating every single one as if they're just socks.

I will say, Wolverine is the first mutant I think of, but when specifically saying X-Men, for some reason I think Cyclops first.

thronedfire2 posted...

they really spent $200m+ on a game after hardly anyone cared about the movies?

What

The first one did 749 million at the box office, and we have no idea how well the second one would have done because it released during COVID and had a streaming release the same date as theater release, though we do know it did well enough to cause the Peacemaker spinoff series, which did extremely well.

There was absolutely an audience for a Suicide Squad game. People were excited when it was first revealed. Saying otherwise is silly.

What killed it was when it was revealed to be a live service game. The concept was great, until then.