Board 8 > Politics Containment Topic 428: Do Not Call

(+) Yeah! (+)

Disagree. It does deter a lot of stuff and let's its focus on the real criminals.

cute but people are literally dying

you're dangerously close to arguing that ukraine should just surrender completely

And you're already beyond arguing that Israel is justified in launching a genocide in Gaza due to Oct 7.

I'm quite alright with my "dangerous" anti-war idea, it's not my first rodeo. But you need to fix your flawed philosophy before going against others.

if the country thinks doing so would save more lives, they should

I have thoughts on the Ukraine conflict, but I don't feel like getting into a 4 topic argument over it.

I also think dropping the atom bombs was wrong

This is 100% a post that pro-Israel people write verbatim, and you've read them before. You're angry at your own inconsistency. Fix your shit.

I also think dropping the atom bombs was wrong

Foolmo, you are capable of understanding context.

Would you do 3 topics?

Should the US have surrendered to Japan immediately after Pearl Harbor, or would it have been better to surrender earlier to prevent even that much violence?

Foolmo, you are capable of understanding context.

Not sure what you're on about or what comparison foolmo is driving at here. The situations are very different.

an attack on a military target by an army that has thus far restricted itself to only attacking military/logistic targets is valid

It's about justifying escalation to try to save lives/violence overall

In this case, surely it's more about ending Russian lives to save Ukrainian lives, not saving lives overall?

an attack on a military target by an army that has thus far restricted itself to only attacking military/logistic targets is valid

which is why the victims should be allowed to fight without asinine restrictions that prevent them from taking initiative in defending themselves. it'd be ukraine deciding whether or not to attack airfields; if the country thinks doing so would save more lives, they should.

Remember when Foolmo said he was bored and was gonna leave until the election?

So you agree with having strict limits on their attack targets so it can never escalate past attacking military/logistics only?

Reminder of what your original post said, so you don't accidentally gaslight yourself

I didn't realize people actually discussed policy ITT not just polls!

it's not even about ending russian lives, it's about destroying military infrastructure they need to wage war. i think the best scenario is zero russian casualties on such an operation!

"asinine" restrictions, bruv. not reasonable restrictions, asinine ones.

to get me to "admit" that war should have restraint

That is what #letukrainestrikebacknolimits disagrees with.

No, to get you to admit that the US should use its power to restrict Ukraine's escalation of war.

but this has been little better than debate-me-bro nonsense

Don't decide unilaterally what the argument was about

Ukraine defending itself at all is an escalation of the war. Just think about it

You decide then? You have yet to say what's missing in the argument, you've just complained about me ending it

cute but people are literally dying

it'd be ukraine deciding whether or not to attack airfields; if the country thinks doing so would save more lives, they should. don't be like the fucking tankies you hate, broadly smearing an ideal over any situation and completely missing the point. you're dangerously close to arguing that ukraine should just surrender completely, and should've immediately

Also Lopen has never ended an online argument in his entire life