Current Events > Marvel reportedly already considered dropping Kang prior to Major's legal issues

Topic List
Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4
darkace77450
11/02/23 3:21:20 AM
#101:


Prestoff posted...
We're talking about a specific variant though, the one where he is supposedly so dangerous the other Kang's stuck him in the Quantum realm. The movie over and over again keeps telling us how much we have to fear him and how much of a badass he is but fails to show why we should fear him and why he's some badass. I get it's a build up, but this movie is a bad first impression for a big bad.

If they wanted to *show* him being the threat they *told* us he was, he should have went Vader vs the rebels at the end of Rogue One and just absolutely mopped the floor with everyone. The moment Kang's ruse was up, Janet should have been the first of many to die. The movie should have ended with Kang alive but still trapped and seeking an escape, Cassey and Hope escaping to warn the Avengers of what's coming, and everyone else dead by Kang's hands (or a sacrifice to close the portal, if you want to give Lang that).

Charged151 posted...
That is also definitely true. No one has or is ready to fill the shoes left by Iron Man/Captain America.

T'Challa could have filled those shoes nicely *and* been natural staging point to introduce the X-Men through Storm. Alas, cancer sucks.
... Copied to Clipboard!
rexcrk
11/02/23 3:22:59 AM
#102:


CervusCanadensi posted...
I am so sick and tired of super hero movies
So youre being forced to watch them..?

---
Chill it out, take it slow, then you rock out the show
... Copied to Clipboard!
HornyLevel
11/02/23 3:23:43 AM
#103:


At this point, I would be surprised Kang Dynasty ever happens. There's no way they're doing a whole Avengers with him, let alone 2, and I'm not just referring to just Majors. Kang overall.

---
Nani?!?
... Copied to Clipboard!
Tora_Sami
11/02/23 3:50:22 AM
#104:


In all honesty, the only reason Kang lost and didn't kill antman was because he got sucked into the dimensional thingy. Otherwise I have no doubt he would have killed both of them. But also, Kangs threat is that he can beat everyone easily with his fists like Thanos. It's the multiverse and the power he can hold over people's lives by controlling the multiverse. Antman is stuck in some kind of Kang dimension, which is why he feels everything is off. I think Kang is a Greta villain, the problem is a villain like that requires a lot of good writing. Which unfortunately the MCU is lacking as of late.

---
Asus E-gaming z490 | 10700k | DDR4 32gb 3200mhz | Asus TUF 3080ti | 1000 watt | Corsair H100i 240 | G7 Odyssey 32" | Orion Spark | Proteus Core
... Copied to Clipboard!
Smashingpmkns
11/02/23 4:26:14 AM
#105:


I think it's becoming increasingly more obvious that the future of Marvel after Endgame really relied on Chadwick Boseman's (RIP) Black Panther. He was obviously being built up as the face of Marvel which would have been a good move. Now they're completely lost, tossing shit at the wall and hoping something sticks.

Not to sound too crass but that exec meeting the morning after his death was probably really fucking intense.

---
http://i.imgur.com/x04tPRZ.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/t7T392I.jpg
... Copied to Clipboard!
Solid_Sonic
11/02/23 4:27:30 AM
#106:


mystic_belmont posted...
Make Terrance Howard Kang.

If he didn't retire recently I actually had a similar idea myself. Would be amazing.

---
Being proud of yourself is cringe, show some humility.
... Copied to Clipboard!
punkfanalways
11/02/23 4:58:24 AM
#107:


I feel like Disney are just creating a narrative so they can get rid of him without outright stating its because of his DA stuff.

And to the people constantly rabbiting the point give them time to build it up - endgame took a decade to get to the climax!!! We are already five years into this big bad arc and we havent even had buildup on the level of the original avengers let along end game yet. I get there was always going to need to be a bit of a pallet cleanser after the success of Endgame but out of the new characters weve not had any of them interact or team up in five years!
... Copied to Clipboard!
mystic_belmont
11/02/23 8:06:51 AM
#108:


Revelation34 posted...
Because she didn't know that a signal was being sent.

She didn't tell her family anything about being stuck for so many years?

---
"Freedom was meaningless without ownership and control over one's own body" -Tera Hunter 'Joy My Freedom'
[Evil Republican] 3DS FC: 5429-7297-4842
... Copied to Clipboard!
rags_alt
11/02/23 8:11:08 AM
#109:


Fuck make Don Cheadle Kang.

Yes. And make Rhodey one of his variants.

Alternatively, as a plan b, make old Rhodey Kang. And maybe still a variant, idk.
... Copied to Clipboard!
IfGodCouldDie
11/02/23 8:17:19 AM
#110:


TheLiarParadox posted...
Everyone wants Endgame but nobody wants the buildup to Endgame.
This is the real problem.

---
All posters and events depicted in this post are entirely fictitious. Any similarity to actual events or posters, living or dead, is purely coincidental.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Philip027
11/02/23 8:21:23 AM
#111:


Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos.
... Copied to Clipboard!
demel
11/02/23 8:43:16 AM
#112:


Majors killed it as Kang.

Haven't been following the Majors news much but isn't the current evidence in his favour?

---
Bite size...if your mouth is HUGE!
... Copied to Clipboard!
JustaSandwich
11/02/23 8:49:40 AM
#113:


dancing_cactuar posted...
I don't know what you're talking about, the magic rings Shang Chi has and were mentioned as being a mysterious beacon by Bruce Banner and Captain Marvel in the post credits are totally building up to something, just look at how they appeared in the very next movie like how the Tesseract was in Thor, then Captain America, then Avengers.

Big difference is back then we knew what we were building towards and we didn't have to wait as long for things to pay off.

Stark's appearance in The Incredible Hulk establishes that they are gonna build towards the Avengers, giving us that initial seed of hype.

Iron Man 2 teases Mjolnir which is paid off the following year in Thor. Thor teases the Tessaract with is paid off that same year in TFA and again in Avengers the year after that.

Iron Man 2 also sets up SHIELD and Thor sets up Loki's return and him controlling Dr. Selvig, both of which are paid off and tied together with the tesseract buildup in Avengers.

The set up and buildup all had results that came in a timely manner and with a clear direction, which is why Avengers exploded with hype and turned Marvel into a box office powerhouse.

Basically, we really should have had an Avengers movie this year that pays off and ties together some of these dangling plot threads.

Edit: Sorry, I must be getting tired, I completely missed the sarcasm in your post. Took longer than it should have to register the fact that you said the rings appeared in the next movie, which makes it obvious you're being facetious.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Nukazie
11/02/23 8:55:14 AM
#114:


mystic_belmont posted...
Make Terrance Howard Kang.


---
We suffer from the delusion that the entire universe is held in order by the categories of human thought.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Jabraham
11/02/23 9:15:08 AM
#115:


The_Popo posted...
Since Endgame, there have been 10 movies and we are in the middle of the 10th television series. If we just look at movies alone, this is where 10 movies got us in the original MCU build:

1) Iron Man
2) The Incredible Hulk
3) Iron Man 2
4) Thor
5) Captain America: The First Avenger
6) The Avengers
7) Iron Man 3
8) Thor: Dark World
9) Captain America: The Winter Soldier
10) Guardians of the Galaxy

The TV series are much longer than individual movies, but if we count one TV series as being equal to a movie, then we need to add another 10 movies:

11) Avengers: Age of Ultron
12) Ant-Man
13) Captain America: Civil War
14) Doctor Strange
15) Guardians of the Galaxy: Volume 2
16) Spider-Man: Homecoming
17) Thor: Ragnarok
18) Black Panther
19) Avengers: Infinity War
20) Ant-Man and the Wasp

After all of that, it was just Captain Marvel and then Endgame. And as I said, the TV shows are much longer than the movies, so we have basically sat through more media than it originally took for them to get to Endgame.

Also, it took 11 years to go from Iron Man to Endgame. Since then, it has been only about 4 years since Endgame.

We have been absolutely slammed with MCU stuff that had largely gone nowhere. Weve had enough material to get to a new Endgame, yet we havent even reach the equivalent of an Avengers.

Weve allowed for the buildup. We just arent experiencing any buildup.
I think this post really hits the nail on the head. There were fewer individual heroes before, so crossovers happened sooner. Now we've had so many solo movies/shows and not many big team ups. Shang-Chi, the Eternals, Moon Knight, Werewolf-by-Night, Kate Bishop have all been one-off characters so far with little interaction with other major characters. Marvel probably introduced too many characters and the storylines have gotten pretty fragmented now. If they wanted to keep mining content long-term, they could've saved more people for later. Like are they actually going to use Moon Knight anytime soon in a crossover movie?

---
I ain't trippin cause the truth is really you don't know me.
... Copied to Clipboard!
JustaSandwich
11/02/23 9:43:55 AM
#116:


Jabraham posted...
I think this post really hits the nail on the head. There were fewer individual heroes before, so crossovers happened sooner. Now we've had so many solo movies/shows and not many big team ups. Shang-Chi, the Eternals, Moon Knight, Werewolf-by-Night, Kate Bishop have all been one-off characters so far with little interaction with other major characters. Marvel probably introduced too many characters and the storylines have gotten pretty fragmented now. If they wanted to keep mining content long-term, they could've saved more people for later. Like are they actually going to use Moon Knight anytime soon in a crossover movie?

Also compounded by the fact that people just want to X-men to friggin show up already.
... Copied to Clipboard!
punkfanalways
11/02/23 11:03:28 AM
#117:


IfGodCouldDie posted...
This is the real problem.

punkfanalways posted...
I feel like Disney are just creating a narrative so they can get rid of him without outright stating its because of his DA stuff.

And to the people constantly rabbiting the point give them time to build it up - endgame took a decade to get to the climax!!! We are already five years into this big bad arc and we havent even had buildup on the level of the original avengers let along end game yet. I get there was always going to need to be a bit of a pallet cleanser after the success of Endgame but out of the new characters weve not had any of them interact or team up in five years!

... Copied to Clipboard!
mystic_belmont
11/02/23 11:36:39 AM
#118:


Avengers was very tight, with five to six characters to do movies of. Now? Too many characters to keep track of.

Also, the VFX artists must be exhausted.

---
"Freedom was meaningless without ownership and control over one's own body" -Tera Hunter 'Joy My Freedom'
[Evil Republican] 3DS FC: 5429-7297-4842
... Copied to Clipboard!
McMarbles
11/02/23 11:56:09 AM
#119:


Dont blame me, I voted for Kodos.

---
Currently playing: Stardew Valley (Switch)
Never befriend a man in sandals and always measure twice, cut once.
... Copied to Clipboard!
punkfanalways
11/02/23 1:43:07 PM
#120:


mystic_belmont posted...
Avengers was very tight, with five to six characters to do movies of. Now? Too many characters to keep track of.

This is true as well. With so many characters now even when they get together it just feels like a spin off of a spin off.
... Copied to Clipboard!
IceCreamOnStero
11/02/23 1:54:13 PM
#121:


The universe was a lot tighter (for the better). You get the original Avengers solo movies, and then get a quick pay off with Avengers, which was also an extremely accesible, pure fun film. You could walk into Avengers and as long as you have the general gist of the characters down you can have a ton of fun.

Nowadays C-listers (at best) get an entire show you don't care about, and it ties into another C-lister's sjow you don't care about which finally ties into a movie you might care about which only then ties into the big event movie you want to care about.

---
Dokkan ID: 2365415872
... Copied to Clipboard!
Link_of_time
11/02/23 2:01:06 PM
#122:


mystic_belmont posted...
Avengers was very tight, with five to six characters to do movies of. Now? Too many characters to keep track of.

Also, the VFX artists must be exhausted.
Yeah they really need things to be split and let some movies exist as standalone. Blade doesnt need to be in the MCU.

I'd also say that they butchered a lot major storylines and now they're running on fumes content wise.
... Copied to Clipboard!
[deleted]
11/02/23 4:01:42 PM
#149:


[deleted]
... Copied to Clipboard!
VFalcone
11/02/23 4:10:14 PM
#123:


Marvel is failing because it's making a crap load of movies and relevant TV shows about a bunch of characters nobody cares about. People aren't going to fill the theaters to see Moon Knight or Miss Marvel. Who even are they?

MCU is done for. They already used Ironman, Captain America, Hulk, Black Widow, Black Panther, and Spider-Man. The rest like Thor, Doctor Strange and Ant-Man are clinging on for dear life with only GoG standing on its feet. The populace is very simple-minded. Marvel was successful because it was about the A-listers. People want to see stuff about the big-time A-listers. And yes, the actors playing them also matter. The intended replacements for the main A-team will never be accepted by the populace. Ever. Captain America, Hulk, Black Widow, Black Panther, Thor, Spider-Man, etc., will always beat out the nobodies every single time.

All they have left is X-Menverse and Fantastic Four. Or maybe try to milk the multiverse even more and bring in Miles Morales
... Copied to Clipboard!
lolife67
11/02/23 4:15:44 PM
#124:


VFalcone posted...
MCU is done for. They already used Ironman, Captain America, Hulk, Black Widow, Black Panther, and Spider-Man. The rest like Thor, Doctor Strange and Ant-Man are clinging on for dear life with only GoG standing on its feet. The populace is very simple-minded. Marvel was successful because it was about the A-listers. People want to see stuff about the big-time A-listers.
This is completely false. The characters the MCU started with were NOT A-listers at all. The were maybe B-list, at best. You're revising history.

And public knowledge of characters is, ultimately, irrelevant. The vast majority of characters people live were literally unknown before their films.
... Copied to Clipboard!
TheDurinator
11/02/23 4:19:20 PM
#125:


VFalcone posted...
Marvel is failing because it's making a crap load of movies and relevant TV shows about a bunch of characters nobody cares about. People aren't going to fill the theaters to see Moon Knight or Miss Marvel. Who even are they?

MCU is done for. They already used Ironman, Captain America, Hulk, Black Widow, Black Panther, and Spider-Man. The rest like Thor, Doctor Strange and Ant-Man are clinging on for dear life with only GoG standing on its feet. The populace is very simple-minded. Marvel was successful because it was about the A-listers. People want to see stuff about the big-time A-listers. And yes, the actors playing them also matter. The intended replacements for the main A-team will never be accepted by the populace. Ever. Captain America, Hulk, Black Widow, Black Panther, Thor, Spider-Man, etc., will always beat out the nobodies every single time.

All they have left is X-Menverse and Fantastic Four. Or maybe try to milk the multiverse even more and bring in Miles Morales
Marvel's A-listers pre-MCU were Spidey and the X-Men and that's it. The Hulk and Fantastic Four were the closest to them, and out of all of these they only had the rights to Hulk. Cap, Iron Man, Black Panther, etc were B-tier. It worked out because the Avengers were a long-running team and they had the rights to the main members, but the MCU would have probably played out very differently if Marvel had access to Spidey and the X-Men from the beginning.
... Copied to Clipboard!
VFalcone
11/02/23 4:39:57 PM
#126:


lolife67 posted...
This is completely false. The characters the MCU started with were NOT A-listers at all. The were maybe B-list, at best. You're revising history.

And public knowledge of characters is, ultimately, irrelevant. The vast majority of characters people live were literally unknown before their films.

TheDurinator posted...
Marvel's A-listers pre-MCU were Spidey and the X-Men and that's it. The Hulk and Fantastic Four were the closest to them, and out of all of these they only had the rights to Hulk. Cap, Iron Man, Black Panther, etc were B-tier. It worked out because the Avengers were a long-running team and they had the rights to the main members, but the MCU would have probably played out very differently if Marvel had access to Spidey and the X-Men from the beginning.
The main Avengers cast is considered B-tier...? Since when? X-Men, Spiderverse, Fantastic Four, and Avengers are all people even know about
... Copied to Clipboard!
Punished_Blinx
11/02/23 4:42:52 PM
#127:


I do wonder if we're at the point where people aren't really interested in superheroes they haven't heard of before. Or at the very least the hook needs to be both unique and done well like Shang-Chi.

---
A Fallen Mascot
... Copied to Clipboard!
lolife67
11/02/23 4:43:38 PM
#128:


VFalcone posted...
The main Avengers cast is considered B-tier...? Since when? X-Men, Spiderverse, Fantastic Four, and Avengers are all people even know about
Since forever lol as stated, in comics and general public, the "stars" were Spidey and X-people. The Avengers comics didn't start selling comparable until after the MCU became a thing.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Link_of_time
11/02/23 4:53:36 PM
#129:


VFalcone posted...
The main Avengers cast is considered B-tier...? Since when? X-Men, Spiderverse, Fantastic Four, and Avengers are all people even know about
I think they're talking about public knowledge of them. In that case they're right. The public didnt know who ironman, thor or captain america was before MCU. They'd be considered B level celebrities.

This is the DC issue. Everyone knows Batman and Superman. The other founding member of the League, nobody knows who they are.
... Copied to Clipboard!
HornyLevel
11/02/23 4:59:14 PM
#130:


Punished_Blinx posted...
I do wonder if we're at the point where people aren't really interested in superheroes they haven't heard of before. Or at the very least the hook needs to be both unique and done well like Shang-Chi.
I think we're at the point that no one really cares about superheroes anymore. They had their time and did well, but it's time for a break.

The reason we're here now is because of too many random superheroes, not just from Disney, but Sony and DC as well. Eventually, the general audience can't really tell what's what. The MCU could have avoided some of this with a better and tighter build up along with an Avengers by now, but they just added to the burnout.

I expect Deadpool 3 to be the highest grossing superhero movie till probably the next Avengers.

---
Nani?!?
... Copied to Clipboard!
lolife67
11/02/23 5:00:33 PM
#131:


Link_of_time posted...
I think they're talking about public knowledge of them. In that case they're right. The public didnt know who ironman, thor or captain america was before MCU. They'd be considered B level celebrities.

This is the DC issue. Everyone knows Batman and Superman. The other founding member of the League, nobody knows who they are.
Correct. And DC disproves VFalcone's point because even with some of the most recognizable superheroes in Batman, Superman and Wonder Woman, they still failed.
... Copied to Clipboard!
DarkBuster22904
11/02/23 5:06:50 PM
#132:


I'll be honest, I never felt like Kang was a good successor to Thanos as an arc villain.

Maybe it's just a basic-bitch opinion, but Kang doesn't have the widespread recognition or staying power that thanos did, and that's something an arc villain should have. Plenty of people, even non-comic fans, could at least vaguely recognize thanos if you showed a picture of him, even before the MCU. Kang though, we have MCU loyalists who couldn't pick the character out of a police lineup. Face it, in terms of Big bads, he's a C-lister, no matter how powerful he is. He's cool to the Comic reading faithful, and basically nobody else.

Doom or Galactus would have been far more palatable arc villains if they wanted to keep the ball rolling after Thanos.

---
Haven't had a good sig idea since 2006
... Copied to Clipboard!
superbot400
11/02/23 5:09:21 PM
#133:


Smashingpmkns posted...
I think it's becoming increasingly more obvious that the future of Marvel after Endgame really relied on Chadwick Boseman's (RIP) Black Panther. He was obviously being built up as the face of Marvel which would have been a good move. Now they're completely lost, tossing shit at the wall and hoping something sticks.

Not to sound too crass but that exec meeting the morning after his death was probably really fucking intense.

it really sucks because a lot of stories were planned for the Black Panther, and now we cant tell them.


---
http://spinsulin.freeforums.org/the-fantastic-four-respect-thread-t4436.html, my huge ass respect thread. You won't see it.
... Copied to Clipboard!
lolife67
11/02/23 5:11:01 PM
#134:


DarkBuster22904 posted...
Kang doesn't have the widespread recognition or staying power that thanos did
This is more revision. Regular folks had no clue who Thanos was (there were a bunch of people confused by the Avengers end credit scene.) And if you're just talking comic fans then they are just as aware of Kang as they are Thanos, I'd say. In comics, Kang is a MUCH bigger Avengers villain than Thanos is.
... Copied to Clipboard!
superbot400
11/02/23 5:12:56 PM
#135:


lolife67 posted...
This is completely false. The characters the MCU started with were NOT A-listers at all. The were maybe B-list, at best. You're revising history.

And public knowledge of characters is, ultimately, irrelevant. The vast majority of characters people live were literally unknown before their films.

Its funny when you think about it. Because nobody would believe that Marvel was going to surivive with the Iron Man movie back 2008. They were practically bankrupt back then.

Yet people are dooming about Marvel more now then back 2008

---
http://spinsulin.freeforums.org/the-fantastic-four-respect-thread-t4436.html, my huge ass respect thread. You won't see it.
... Copied to Clipboard!
mystic_belmont
11/02/23 5:14:04 PM
#136:


Kang just needs to start showing up in everything, screwing with a bunch of stuff.

The only confrontation we have is a Kang mad that Janet left him stranded.

If Kang has time travel stuff, pruning important people from the timeline would be very interesting. I think that is what they tried to do at the end of Ant Man 3

---
"Freedom was meaningless without ownership and control over one's own body" -Tera Hunter 'Joy My Freedom'
[Evil Republican] 3DS FC: 5429-7297-4842
... Copied to Clipboard!
lolife67
11/02/23 5:16:36 PM
#137:


superbot400 posted...
Its funny when you think about it. Because nobody would believe that Marvel was going to surivive with the Iron Man movie back 2008. They were practically bankrupt back then.

Yet people are dooming about Marvel more then they are now.
Yup lol they're a victim of their own success unfortunately. They made it look so easy for so long that people took it for granted. Even after so many other studios tried (and failed) to launch their own cinematic universes.

It's telling that they only appear to be "dying" in comparison to their past successes. If you actually look at the movie studio landscape, Marvel Studios is still doing very well.
... Copied to Clipboard!
KalimariX8
11/02/23 5:20:55 PM
#138:


Dr Doom arc would have been pretty dope ngl

---
member of the sam jackson alliance
Kalimari
... Copied to Clipboard!
Punished_Blinx
11/02/23 5:22:23 PM
#139:


mystic_belmont posted...
Kang just needs to start showing up in everything, screwing with a bunch of stuff.

The only confrontation we have is a Kang mad that Janet left him stranded.

If Kang has time travel stuff, pruning important people from the timeline would be very interesting. I think that is what they tried to do at the end of Ant Man 3

Part of the reason Thanos worked so well is that he didn't need to do anything in most movies. The build up was easy to understand. There's this bad guy in the background wanting these powerful stones that are the common thread in these movies. The heroes don't really know about him until the big crossover.

Multiverse Kang revealed in a TV show monologue is a lot more confusing to keep up with.

---
A Fallen Mascot
... Copied to Clipboard!
mystic_belmont
11/02/23 5:23:43 PM
#140:


Punished_Blinx posted...
Part of the reason Thanos worked so well is that he didn't need to do anything in most movies. The build up was easy to understand. There's this bad guy in the background wanting these powerful stones that are the common thread in these movies. The heroes don't really know about him until the big crossover.

Multiverse Kang revealed in a TV show monologue is a lot more confusing to keep up with.

That is why Kang messing with the timeline, erasing people would be very interesting.

I think he did it at the end of Ant Man.

---
"Freedom was meaningless without ownership and control over one's own body" -Tera Hunter 'Joy My Freedom'
[Evil Republican] 3DS FC: 5429-7297-4842
... Copied to Clipboard!
VFalcone
11/02/23 6:19:16 PM
#141:


lolife67 posted...
Correct. And DC disproves VFalcone's point because even with some of the most recognizable superheroes in Batman, Superman and Wonder Woman, they still failed.
DC is a special case though because their movies were just straight bad. Their goodwill was burned after their third movie lol. DCEU had Man of Steel and Wonder Woman that both did well. Then BvS came out, then JL... and it was a wrap. DCEU died before it could start because the movies were too bad and the public won't forgive that.
... Copied to Clipboard!
lolife67
11/02/23 6:22:50 PM
#142:


VFalcone posted...
DC is a special case though because their movies were just straight bad. Their goodwill was burned after their third movie lol. DCEU had Man of Steel and Wonder Woman that both did well. Then BvS came out, then JL... and it was a wrap. DCEU died before it could start because the movies were too bad and the public won't forgive that.
You're proving my point. Having A listers are irrelevant if your movie is bad. Just like having unknown characters doesn't matter if the movie is good. Quality is the main factor, not character awareness.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Smashingpmkns
11/02/23 6:24:50 PM
#143:


The only really good MCU movie after Endgame (which imo wasn't even all that great compared to IW) has been GotG3. GotG3 almost felt like the perfect place to disembark from this franchise.

---
http://i.imgur.com/x04tPRZ.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/t7T392I.jpg
... Copied to Clipboard!
VFalcone
11/02/23 6:25:35 PM
#144:


lolife67 posted...
You're proving my point. Having A listers are irrelevant if your movie is bad. Just like having unknown characters doesn't matter if the movie is good. Quality is the main factor, not character awareness.
My overall point was that people aren't going to buy tickets to see a movie about characters they don't know or care about even if it gets 98% Rotten Tomatoes, so the movies fail automatically.

With DC, they burned the public so badly that every movie is destined to fail no matter who's in it

... Copied to Clipboard!
CableZL
11/02/23 6:26:36 PM
#145:


VFalcone posted...
My overall point was that people aren't going to buy tickets to see a movie about characters they don't know or care about even if it gets 98% Rotten Tomatoes, so the movies fail automatically
Didn't Guardians of the Galaxy do very well?

---
https://i.imgtc.com/d9Fc4Qq.gif https://i.imgtc.com/BKHTxYq.gif
https://i.imgtc.com/vYYIuDx.jpg
... Copied to Clipboard!
Hayame_Zero
11/02/23 6:26:59 PM
#146:


lolife67 posted...
You're proving my point. Having A listers are irrelevant if your movie is bad. Just like having unknown characters doesn't matter if the movie is good. Quality is the main factor, not character awareness.
Yeah, nobody knew who the Guardians of the Galaxy were before it came out, and it ended up being a fan favorite. It doesn't matter if they use lesser known characters since most of them were to begin with.

Modern MCU is an issue of oversaturation and disorganization.

---
...I think I'm done here...
... Copied to Clipboard!
A_Good_Boy
11/02/23 6:27:10 PM
#147:


VFalcone posted...
My overall point was that people aren't going to buy tickets to see a movie about characters they don't know or care about even if it gets 98% Rotten Tomatoes, so the movies fail automatically
I don't think that's necessarily true. People showed up to GotG and Shang-Chi. Like, who the fuck are those guys amirite?

---
Who is? I am!
... Copied to Clipboard!
VFalcone
11/02/23 6:27:43 PM
#148:


CableZL posted...
Didn't Guardians of the Galaxy do very well?

Hayame_Zero posted...
Yeah, nobody knew who the Guardians of the Galaxy were before it came out, and it ended up being a fan favorite. It doesn't matter if they use lesser known characters since most of them were to begin with.

Modern MCU is an issue of oversaturation and disorganization.

A_Good_Boy posted...
I don't think that's necessarily true. People showed up to GotG and Shang-Chi. Like, who the fuck are those guys amirite?
It's the only Marvel team standing on its legs now. But they aren't from Phase 4...

I think GotG succeeded because it came out at the best time possible. It got to ride alongside the success of Phases 1-3 where everyone was hype and interested with Marvel so they were more willing to give GotG a try. Now GotG can continue to succeed in 2023 because it still has the fans it got back then.

I don't think GotG would have done so well if it first debuted today.

... Copied to Clipboard!
Punished_Blinx
11/02/23 6:32:28 PM
#150:


I think people would show up if they got 98% rotten tomatoes scores. But they aren't.

---
A Fallen Mascot
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4