Current Events > POLL: Would you have sex with a really hot but extreme conservative chick?

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2
Kim_Seong-a 09/29/23 8:38:45 PM #51:	Google says that the failure rate for condoms is 3%. That's a ~1-in-30 chance that her bloodline continues. Not worth it. --- Lusa Cfaad Taydr <cite>Kim_Seong-a posted [p:976384092] in POLL: Woul... [t:80580770]...</cite> <quote>Google says that the failure rate for condoms is 3%.That's a ~1-in-30 chance that her bloodline continues. Not worth it. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
chaos_knight 09/29/23 8:38:53 PM #52:	Yeah. --- Seattle Seahawks Super Bowl XLVIII Champions <cite>chaos_knight posted [p:976384096] in POLL: Woul... [t:80580770]...</cite> <quote>Yeah. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Torgo 09/29/23 8:40:04 PM #53:	Have sex with: yes Date or have a long term relationship with: ehhh probably not --- Be careful: I was moderated for telling people not to commit illegal acts of assault and murder. It's not worth trying to be the voice of reason sometimes. <cite>Torgo posted [p:976384115] in POLL: Woul... [t:80580770]...</cite> <quote>Have sex with: yesDate or have a long term relationship with: ehhh probably not </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Ronaldo 09/29/23 8:44:30 PM #54:	Yes. I am adamantly against discrimination and prejudice so it would be hypocritical of me not to. <cite>Ronaldo posted [p:976384195] in POLL: Woul... [t:80580770]...</cite> <quote>Yes. I am adamantly against discrimination and prejudice so it would be hypocritical of me not to. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hockeybub89 09/29/23 8:51:34 PM #55:	coolguyjimmy posted... Sex is literally life. Without it, you wouldn't exist -- so give it a little respect. No life is going to be created by a hatefuck or other one night stands. I get that a lot of people have sex, but that's no reason to reduce the people you are interested in to objects. --- http://card.psnprofiles.com/1/NIR_Hockey.png he/him/they/them <cite>hockeybub89 posted [p:976384318] in POLL: Woul... [t:80580770]...</cite> <quote>coolguyjimmy posted... </cite><quote>Sex is literally life. Without it, you wouldn't exist -- so give it a little respect.</quote>No life is going to be created by a hatefuck or other one night stands.I get that a lot of people have sex, but that's no reason to reduce the people you are interested in to objects. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
dioxxys 09/29/23 8:54:09 PM #56:	The ultimate yuck of 261 Sorry not sorry sex is sex <cite>dioxxys posted [p:976384359] in POLL: Woul... [t:80580770]...</cite> <quote>The ultimate yuck of 261Sorry not sorry sex is sex</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
NeonTentacles 09/29/23 8:54:14 PM #57:	Yeah. It's not like her vagina or boobs are conservative >_> --- https://imgur.com/aMaI3hj https://imgur.com/7PsdJNc https://imgur.com/eK8vZVn https://imgur.com/u2HR4nG https://imgur.com/nQGM5cZ <cite>NeonTentacles posted [p:976384362] in POLL: Woul... [t:80580770]...</cite> <quote>Yeah. It's not like her vagina or boobs are conservative >_> </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#58	Post #58 was unavailable or deleted.
hockeybub89 09/29/23 11:22:13 PM #59:	dioxxys posted... The ultimate yuck of 261 Sorry not sorry sex is sex I don't know what went on at 261. Objectification is objectification. It's gross to reduce people to their looks, even if they are bad people. And it's goofy to equate being against such behavior to being anti-sex. I could read up on pro-life stances if I wanted to see women reduced to a pair of boobs with a warm hole. --- http://card.psnprofiles.com/1/NIR_Hockey.png he/him/they/them <cite>hockeybub89 posted [p:976386587] in POLL: Woul... [t:80580770]...</cite> <quote>dioxxys posted... </cite><quote>The ultimate yuck of 261Sorry not sorry sex is sex</quote>I don't know what went on at 261. Objectification is objectification. It's gross to reduce people to their looks, even if they are bad people. And it's goofy to equate being against such behavior to being anti-sex.I could read up on pro-life stances if I wanted to see women reduced to a pair of boobs with a warm hole. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
chaos_knight 09/29/23 11:23:37 PM #60:	hockeybub89 posted... I don't know what went on at 261. Objectification is objectification. It's gross to reduce people to their looks, even if they are bad people. And it's goofy to equate being against such behavior to being anti-sex. I could read up on pro-life stances if I wanted to see women reduced to a pair of boobs with a warm hole. It's how humanity has existed and thrived since the damn of time. But keep feeling superior you are above base impulses I guess. --- Seattle Seahawks Super Bowl XLVIII Champions <cite>chaos_knight posted [p:976386601] in POLL: Woul... [t:80580770]...</cite> <quote>hockeybub89 posted... </cite><quote>I don't know what went on at 261. Objectification is objectification. It's gross to reduce people to their looks, even if they are bad people. And it's goofy to equate being against such behavior to being anti-sex.I could read up on pro-life stances if I wanted to see women reduced to a pair of boobs with a warm hole.</quote>It's how humanity has existed and thrived since the damn of time. But keep feeling superior you are above base impulses I guess. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
thekosmicfool 09/29/23 11:23:52 PM #61:	Yeah I'd rather disappoint someone with abhorrent viewpoints than someone cool. --- Cover your knees up if you're gonna be walkin' around everywhere. <cite>thekosmicfool posted [p:976386605] in POLL: Woul... [t:80580770]...</cite> <quote>Yeah I'd rather disappoint someone with abhorrent viewpoints than someone cool. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ArsGoetia 09/29/23 11:27:25 PM #62:	hockeybub89 posted... I don't know what went on at 261. Objectification is objectification. It's gross to reduce people to their looks, even if they are bad people. And it's goofy to equate being against such behavior to being anti-sex. I could read up on pro-life stances if I wanted to see women reduced to a pair of boobs with a warm hole. what are you going on about lmao why is the concept of two ppl having casual sex for no reason other than mutual physical attraction so morally repugnant to you? <cite>ArsGoetia posted [p:976386650] in POLL: Woul... [t:80580770]...</cite> <quote>hockeybub89 posted... </cite><quote>I don't know what went on at 261. Objectification is objectification. It's gross to reduce people to their looks, even if they are bad people. And it's goofy to equate being against such behavior to being anti-sex.I could read up on pro-life stances if I wanted to see women reduced to a pair of boobs with a warm hole.</quote>what are you going on about lmao why is the concept of two ppl having casual sex for no reason other than mutual physical attraction so morally repugnant to you?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
xlr_big-coop 09/29/23 11:53:39 PM #63:	I would even if she was extreme left/right --- :) <cite>xlr_big-coop posted [p:976387000] in POLL: Woul... [t:80580770]...</cite> <quote>I would even if she was extreme left/right </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CyborgSage00x0 09/29/23 11:59:02 PM #64:	Guide posted... The whole point of casual sex is not having to care about people. This. And depending on the situation, I may not even know her political views at all. Anything more than a one night stand would be a no, but yes otherwise. I don't need to agree with her to do a hit it and quit it one time. --- PotD's resident Film Expert. <cite>CyborgSage00x0 posted [p:976387077] in POLL: Woul... [t:80580770]...</cite> <quote>Guide posted... </cite><quote>The whole point of casual sex is not having to care about people.</quote>This. And depending on the situation, I may not even know her political views at all. Anything more than a one night stand would be a no, but yes otherwise. I don't need to agree with her to do a hit it and quit it one time. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
kage_53 09/30/23 12:36:43 AM #65:	EmilyTheCEman posted... Fixed for accuracy. So, youre an aging virgin then????? <cite>kage_53 posted [p:976387523] in POLL: Woul... [t:80580770]...</cite> <quote>EmilyTheCEman posted... </cite><quote>Fixed for accuracy.</quote>So, youre an aging virgin then?????</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
FolkenRawr 09/30/23 12:37:01 AM #66:	ai123 posted... Not now. In the past? Probably. --- Cookin like a chef, I'm a 5 Star Michelin <cite>FolkenRawr posted [p:976387528] in POLL: Woul... [t:80580770]...</cite> <quote>ai123 posted... </cite><quote>Not now.In the past? Probably.</quote> </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kradek 09/30/23 12:47:07 AM #67:	I dunno, I'd like to say no, however the reality is I probably would. The main issue would be getting to that point. Right-wingers are known for shoving their political views into everything they do and nearly every conversation they have if it goes on long enough. If we were on a date guaranteed to lead to sex, it would likely be impossible to have a successful date because at some point we'd be arguing and she'd likely end the convo calling me some "communist cuck", or whatever. Or at least she'd think it's the end until I hit her with the "at least I'm not some fucking Christo-fascist rooting for the end of democracy" Vyrulisse posted... If I liked the person. Political leanings are irrelevant to me unless they are like super extremist. "extreme conservative" is literally in the topic title. --- My metal band, Ivory King, has 2 songs out now - allmylinks.com/ivorykingtx (all of our links there so you can choose which one you'd prefer to use) <cite>Kradek posted [p:976387636] in POLL: Woul... [t:80580770]...</cite> <quote>I dunno, I'd like to say no, however the reality is I probably would. The main issue would be getting to that point. Right-wingers are known for shoving their political views into everything they do and nearly every conversation they have if it goes on long enough. If we were on a date guaranteed to lead to sex, it would likely be impossible to have a successful date because at some point we'd be arguing and she'd likely end the convo calling me some "communist cuck", or whatever. Or at least she'd think it's the end until I hit her with the "at least I'm not some fucking Christo-fascist rooting for the end of democracy"Vyrulisse posted... </cite><quote>If I liked the person. Political leanings are irrelevant to me unless they are like super extremist.</quote>"extreme conservative" is literally in the topic title. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
divot1338 09/30/23 10:48:58 AM #68:	Kradek posted... I dunno, I'd like to say no, however the reality is I probably would. The main issue would be getting to that point. Right-wingers are known for shoving their political views into everything they do and nearly every conversation they have if it goes on long enough. If we were on a date guaranteed to lead to sex, it would likely be impossible to have a successful date because at some point we'd be arguing and she'd likely end the convo calling me some "communist cuck", or whatever. Or at least she'd think it's the end until I hit her with the "at least I'm not some fucking Christo-fascist rooting for the end of democracy" "extreme conservative" is literally in the topic title. Some people get turned on arguing like that. Its definitely a challenge to a relationship but thats not the same as taking the redeye to poundtown. --- Moustache twirling villian https://i.imgur.com/U3lt3H4.jpg- Kerbey <cite>divot1338 posted [p:976392594] in POLL: Woul... [t:80580770]...</cite> <quote>Kradek posted... </cite><quote>I dunno, I'd like to say no, however the reality is I probably would. The main issue would be getting to that point. Right-wingers are known for shoving their political views into everything they do and nearly every conversation they have if it goes on long enough. If we were on a date guaranteed to lead to sex, it would likely be impossible to have a successful date because at some point we'd be arguing and she'd likely end the convo calling me some "communist cuck", or whatever. Or at least she'd think it's the end until I hit her with the "at least I'm not some fucking Christo-fascist rooting for the end of democracy""extreme conservative" is literally in the topic title.</quote>Some people get turned on arguing like that. Its definitely a challenge to a relationship but thats not the same as taking the redeye to poundtown. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hockeybub89 09/30/23 12:37:03 PM #69:	ArsGoetia posted... what are you going on about lmao why is the concept of two ppl having casual sex for no reason other than mutual physical attraction so morally repugnant to you? Because people are whole people and I cannot comprehend how we could use each other like meaningless objects to be thrown away when done. I am literally incapable of understanding the concept. They might as well be screwing a sex doll. Isn't this like the definition of misogyny and misandry? --- http://card.psnprofiles.com/1/NIR_Hockey.png he/him/they/them <cite>hockeybub89 posted [p:976394128] in POLL: Woul... [t:80580770]...</cite> <quote>ArsGoetia posted... </cite><quote>what are you going on about lmao why is the concept of two ppl having casual sex for no reason other than mutual physical attraction so morally repugnant to you?</quote>Because people are whole people and I cannot comprehend how we could use each other like meaningless objects to be thrown away when done. I am literally incapable of understanding the concept. They might as well be screwing a sex doll.Isn't this like the definition of misogyny and misandry? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dungeater 09/30/23 12:43:36 PM #70:	hockeybub89 posted... Because people are whole people and I cannot comprehend how we could use each other like meaningless objects to be thrown away when done. I am literally incapable of understanding the concept. They might as well be screwing a sex doll. Isn't this like the definition of misogyny and misandry? u could make the argument for that but some ppl are just built diff. i personally cant imagine doing this, nor can i imagine engaging in casual sex anymore, since i was only active in that regard when i hated myself and used it to self sabotage but that doesnt mean any of that or a hundred other reasons apply to those who would look past the morality in sleeping with someone with bad views idk where im going with this, ig i just wanted to sympathize with u over this and say it isnt for us to say, but its certainly ur prerogative if u wanna judge ppl for it --- My fate was the grandest, most brilliant of them all. <cite>Dungeater posted [p:976394224] in POLL: Woul... [t:80580770]...</cite> <quote>hockeybub89 posted... </cite><quote>Because people are whole people and I cannot comprehend how we could use each other like meaningless objects to be thrown away when done. I am literally incapable of understanding the concept. They might as well be screwing a sex doll.Isn't this like the definition of misogyny and misandry?</quote>u could make the argument for that but some ppl are just built diff. i personally cant imagine doing this, nor can i imagine engaging in casual sex anymore, since i was only active in that regard when i hated myself and used it to self sabotagebut that doesnt mean any of that or a hundred other reasons apply to those who would look past the morality in sleeping with someone with bad views idk where im going with this, ig i just wanted to sympathize with u over this and say it isnt for us to say, but its certainly ur prerogative if u wanna judge ppl for it </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ArsGoetia 09/30/23 12:53:02 PM #71:	hockeybub89 posted... Because people are whole people and I cannot comprehend how we could use each other like meaningless objects to be thrown away when done. I am literally incapable of understanding the concept. They might as well be screwing a sex doll. Isn't this like the definition of misogyny and misandry? no disrespect but are you a virgin its cool if you are, nothing wrong with that <cite>ArsGoetia posted [p:976394350] in POLL: Woul... [t:80580770]...</cite> <quote>hockeybub89 posted... </cite><quote>Because people are whole people and I cannot comprehend how we could use each other like meaningless objects to be thrown away when done. I am literally incapable of understanding the concept. They might as well be screwing a sex doll.Isn't this like the definition of misogyny and misandry?</quote>no disrespect but are you a virgin its cool if you are, nothing wrong with that</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hockeybub89 09/30/23 1:01:20 PM #72:	ArsGoetia posted... no disrespect but are you a virgin its cool if you are, nothing wrong with that And I have no interest in not being a virgin. Probably because I'm incapable of viewing sex so casually. I'm not even interested in it emotionally. Like, I get understand that people have causal sex. My issue was with the "I'll fuck anything that moves. It actually makes it hotter when they're shitty people!" stuff. But like I said, it's beyond me. --- http://card.psnprofiles.com/1/NIR_Hockey.png he/him/they/them <cite>hockeybub89 posted [p:976394474] in POLL: Woul... [t:80580770]...</cite> <quote>ArsGoetia posted... </cite><quote>no disrespect but are you a virgin its cool if you are, nothing wrong with that</quote>And I have no interest in not being a virgin. Probably because I'm incapable of viewing sex so casually. I'm not even interested in it emotionally.Like, I get understand that people have causal sex. My issue was with the "I'll fuck anything that moves. It actually makes it hotter when they're shitty people!" stuff. But like I said, it's beyond me. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
NoxObscuras 09/30/23 1:40:25 PM #73:	hockeybub89 posted... Because people are whole people and I cannot comprehend how we could use each other like meaningless objects to be thrown away when done. I am literally incapable of understanding the concept. They might as well be screwing a sex doll. Isn't this like the definition of misogyny and misandry? I'm not sure if it counts as misogyny or misandry when both people involved are just in it for the sex. hockeybub89 posted... Like, I understand that people have causal sex. My issue was with the "I'll fuck anything that moves. It actually makes it hotter when they're shitty people!" stuff. But like I said, it's beyond me. Yeah, that mentality is beyond me too. I don't judge people for it, but it's not something I could ever participate in. I can't have sex without already being in a committed relationship. --- PSN - NoxObscuras Z490 \| i9-10900K \| EVGA 3080 FTW3 Ultra \| 32GB DDR4 3600 \| 4TB SSD <cite>NoxObscuras posted [p:976395092] in POLL: Woul... [t:80580770]...</cite> <quote>hockeybub89 posted... </cite><quote>Because people are whole people and I cannot comprehend how we could use each other like meaningless objects to be thrown away when done. I am literally incapable of understanding the concept. They might as well be screwing a sex doll.Isn't this like the definition of misogyny and misandry?</quote>I'm not sure if it counts as misogyny or misandry when both people involved are just in it for the sex.hockeybub89 posted... </cite><quote>Like, I understand that people have causal sex. My issue was with the "I'll fuck anything that moves. It actually makes it hotter when they're shitty people!" stuff. But like I said, it's beyond me.</quote>Yeah, that mentality is beyond me too. I don't judge people for it, but it's not something I could ever participate in. I can't have sex without already being in a committed relationship. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ThyCorndog 09/30/23 1:46:23 PM #74:	I'd have sex with most physically attractive women if they wanted me to relationship is a different story --- https://i.imgur.com/6cPXvLN.jpg https://i.imgur.com/hVC4i6j.jpg <cite>ThyCorndog posted [p:976395170] in POLL: Woul... [t:80580770]...</cite> <quote>I'd have sex with most physically attractive women if they wanted me torelationship is a different story </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
dioxxys 10/02/23 5:07:52 PM #75:	hockeybub89 posted... . Objectification is objectification. It's gross to reduce people to their looks, even if they are bad people. And it's goofy to equate being against such behavior to being anti-sex. Oh no people like procreating and having sex that's why there's a sex industry. Nothing wrong about it. Sex feels good. <cite>dioxxys posted [p:976435704] in POLL: Woul... [t:80580770]...</cite> <quote>hockeybub89 posted... </cite><quote>. Objectification is objectification. It's gross to reduce people to their looks, even if they are bad people. And it's goofy to equate being against such behavior to being anti-sex.</quote>Oh no people like procreating and having sex that's why there's a sex industry. Nothing wrong about it. Sex feels good. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Ruvan22 10/02/23 5:14:19 PM #76:	dioxxys posted... Oh no people like procreating and having sex that's why there's a sex industry. Nothing wrong about it. Sex feels good. So people should be reduced to their looks? <cite>Ruvan22 posted [p:976435813] in POLL: Woul... [t:80580770]...</cite> <quote>dioxxys posted... </cite><quote>Oh no people like procreating and having sex that's why there's a sex industry. Nothing wrong about it. Sex feels good.</quote>So people should be reduced to their looks?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
dioxxys 10/02/23 5:24:36 PM #77:	Ruvan22 posted... So people should be reduced to their looks? That's what casual sex and the sex industry is all about, It's about looks. No one said people in general should be reduced to their looks that's something you said <cite>dioxxys posted [p:976435983] in POLL: Woul... [t:80580770]...</cite> <quote>Ruvan22 posted... </cite><quote>So people should be reduced to their looks?</quote>That's what casual sex and the sex industry is all about, It's about looks.No one said people in general should be reduced to their looks that's something you said</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Ruvan22 10/02/23 5:30:53 PM #78:	dioxxys posted... That's what casual sex and the sex industry is all about, It's about looks. No one said people in general should be reduced to their looks that's something you said Well you were responding to the statement "It's gross to reduce people to their looks, even if they are bad people." so it's something you were contradicting. <cite>Ruvan22 posted [p:976436078] in POLL: Woul... [t:80580770]...</cite> <quote>dioxxys posted... </cite><quote>That's what casual sex and the sex industry is all about, It's about looks.No one said people in general should be reduced to their looks that's something you said</quote>Well you were responding to the statement "It's gross to reduce people to their looks, even if they are bad people." so it's something you were contradicting.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Anteaterking 10/02/23 5:39:08 PM #79:	Probably, but I don't think there's a reasonable sequence of events where we get to that point. Like if I was in a middle of a dry spell and knew that I would get to hook up with her if I made it through e.g. the dinner, I could get around the politics stuff. Or if she matched with me on an app and was like "Hey I'm super conservative but I'm looking for someone to just come over and **** me tonight and not make conversation". But actually pursuing a relationship enough to convince her to have sex with me seems unlikely. --- http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b136/Anteaterking/scan00021.jpg http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b136/Anteaterking/scan00021.jpg <cite>Anteaterking posted [p:976436258] in POLL: Woul... [t:80580770]...</cite> <quote>Probably, but I don't think there's a reasonable sequence of events where we get to that point.Like if I was in a middle of a dry spell and knew that I would get to hook up with her if I made it through e.g. the dinner, I could get around the politics stuff. Or if she matched with me on an app and was like "Hey I'm super conservative but I'm looking for someone to just come over and **** me tonight and not make conversation".But actually pursuing a relationship enough to convince her to have sex with me seems unlikely. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2

Current Events > POLL: Would you have sex with a really hot but extreme conservative chick? (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > POLL: Would you have sex with a really hot but extreme conservative chick?