Current Events > Was Fallout 4 Good?

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2
Fin_Dawg_004 09/02/23 12:22:37 PM #1:	Was it - Results (29 votes) Great 13.79% (4 votes) 4 Good 41.38% (12 votes) 12 Okay 34.48% (10 votes) 10 Bad 3.45% (1 vote) 1 Terrible 6.9% (2 votes) 2 I bought it when it came out and played it for around 10-15 hours. I remember thinking it was okay, but just lost interest and never went back to it. --- Ruthkanda Forever <cite>Fin_Dawg_004 posted [p:975814820] in Was Fallou... [t:80553727]...</cite> <quote> Was it - Results (29 votes) Great 13.79% (4 votes) 4 Good 41.38% (12 votes) 12 Okay 34.48% (10 votes) 10 Bad 3.45% (1 vote) 1 Terrible 6.9% (2 votes) 2 Show Voting Form I bought it when it came out and played it for around 10-15 hours. I remember thinking it was okay, but just lost interest and never went back to it. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Wedge_Antilles 09/02/23 12:23:20 PM #2:	Good game but people were expecting great. --- I used the knife. I saved a child. I won a war. God forgive me. <cite>Wedge_Antilles posted [p:975814830] in Was Fallou... [t:80553727]...</cite> <quote>Good game but people were expecting great. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Alteres 09/02/23 12:23:35 PM #3:	Good, not great. --- ........the ghost in the machine... IGN: Fox, FC: 5344-2646-0982 <cite>Alteres posted [p:975814834] in Was Fallou... [t:80553727]...</cite> <quote>Good, not great. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Xatrion 09/02/23 12:23:41 PM #4:	Meh. Much improved with mods, but vastly inferior to 3 and NV. --- Shut your BF28/9 sound hole and listen up. Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice? Strike three. <cite>Xatrion posted [p:975814836] in Was Fallou... [t:80553727]...</cite> <quote>Meh. Much improved with mods, but vastly inferior to 3 and NV. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
RchHomieQuanChi 09/02/23 12:25:57 PM #5:	Good game, mediocre Fallout game --- I have nothing else to say <cite>RchHomieQuanChi posted [p:975814868] in Was Fallou... [t:80553727]...</cite> <quote>Good game, mediocre Fallout game </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LearntoRead 09/02/23 12:51:19 PM #6:	I actually played Fallout 3 to death. I replayed it like 10 times, each with a different stat allocation. It was the first game I had seen like it. I also played New Vegas, which improved a lot of things from 3. This is where 4 falls short. It's an improvement on 3 while falling short of some of the things NV or mods did. Also, unlimited levels sounds good in theory, but all it means is you have the same character by end game. In hindsight the old stat and perk system was better. So, in short it's a good game but it just falls short. <cite>LearntoRead posted [p:975815274] in Was Fallou... [t:80553727]...</cite> <quote>I actually played Fallout 3 to death. I replayed it like 10 times, each with a different stat allocation. It was the first game I had seen like it. I also played New Vegas, which improved a lot of things from 3.This is where 4 falls short. It's an improvement on 3 while falling short of some of the things NV or mods did. Also, unlimited levels sounds good in theory, but all it means is you have the same character by end game. In hindsight the old stat and perk system was better.So, in short it's a good game but it just falls short.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ellis123 09/02/23 12:52:54 PM #7:	A mediocre RPG that is a good FPS. --- "A shouted order to do something of dubious morality with an unpredictable outcome? Thweeet!" My FC is in my profile. <cite>ellis123 posted [p:975815299] in Was Fallou... [t:80553727]...</cite> <quote>A mediocre RPG that is a good FPS. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
firedoom666 09/02/23 12:59:29 PM #8:	It's the best game Bethesda has made --- We're on a journey to forever! Dreams eternal in a wondrous world without walls We are Forever, wondering what the future holds <cite>firedoom666 posted [p:975815409] in Was Fallou... [t:80553727]...</cite> <quote>It's the best game Bethesda has made </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#9	Post #9 was unavailable or deleted.
LeCh0nk 09/02/23 1:03:44 PM #10:	It was a good game. I enjoyed playing it, even without mods. The gameplay was good, which was a major plus point. If it had gunplay like FO3 or NV it would not have been successful. --- @('_')@ <cite>LeCh0nk posted [p:975815483] in Was Fallou... [t:80553727]...</cite> <quote>It was a good game. I enjoyed playing it, even without mods.The gameplay was good, which was a major plus point. If it had gunplay like FO3 or NV it would not have been successful. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KiwiTerraRizing 09/02/23 1:06:18 PM #11:	Bethesda will never deliver on the hype. They can get 80% there but itll never be all the way. Their worlds are so big and empty. --- Trucking Legend Don Schneider! <cite>KiwiTerraRizing posted [p:975815523] in Was Fallou... [t:80553727]...</cite> <quote>Bethesda will never deliver on the hype. They can get 80% there but itll never be all the way. Their worlds are so big and empty. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Vyrulisse 09/02/23 1:06:24 PM #12:	Nice world map. Okay gunplay Shit-tier RPG. --- http://i.imgur.com/6VeX04D.jpg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZEcqHA7dbwM <cite>Vyrulisse posted [p:975815524] in Was Fallou... [t:80553727]...</cite> <quote>Nice world map.Okay gunplayShit-tier RPG. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Alucard188 09/02/23 1:11:30 PM #13:	It was okay. Perfectly mediocre. Gun mechanics were better than any previous Fallout game, but that's really it. --- Face it Cloud is a gaming icon and has appered in lots of games while mario has only appeared in 2 games sunshine and 64~xSlashbomBx <cite>Alucard188 posted [p:975815606] in Was Fallou... [t:80553727]...</cite> <quote>It was okay. Perfectly mediocre. Gun mechanics were better than any previous Fallout game, but that's really it. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Agonized_rufous 09/02/23 1:12:37 PM #14:	VR is really neat. Would rather new Vegas VR but whatever --- "All I have is my balls and my word, and I don't break them for anyone!"-Tony Montana <cite>Agonized_rufous posted [p:975815628] in Was Fallou... [t:80553727]...</cite> <quote>VR is really neat. Would rather new Vegas VR but whatever </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
K181 09/02/23 1:14:00 PM #15:	It was okay. I got bored with it after forty or so hours, so it was worthwhile. But compared to FO3 and NV, both of which I put over a hundred hours into, or Oblivion or Skyrim, both of which I put way more into, it was a disappointment by comparison. --- Irregardless, for all intensive purposes, I could care less. <cite>K181 posted [p:975815650] in Was Fallou... [t:80553727]...</cite> <quote>It was okay. I got bored with it after forty or so hours, so it was worthwhile. But compared to FO3 and NV, both of which I put over a hundred hours into, or Oblivion or Skyrim, both of which I put way more into, it was a disappointment by comparison. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Southernfatman 09/02/23 1:14:42 PM #16:	I had a lot of fun with it despite its flaws. Had lots of fun with the settlement building, but I love games like The Sims so I dug it. The gun play is certainly better, but New Vegas is still better in every other way. Still, just because NV was better doesn't mean this one totally sucked. --- http://i.imgur.com/hslUvRN.jpg When I sin I sin real good. <cite>Southernfatman posted [p:975815661] in Was Fallou... [t:80553727]...</cite> <quote>I had a lot of fun with it despite its flaws. Had lots of fun with the settlement building, but I love games like The Sims so I dug it. The gun play is certainly better, but New Vegas is still better in every other way. Still, just because NV was better doesn't mean this one totally sucked. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Shotgunnova 09/02/23 1:24:15 PM #17:	Other than the gunplay and settlement building, it's hard to care too much about it nowadays. The main story is massively underwhelming and the dialogue system sucks, so you're usually just left with manufacturing your own fun by collecting stuff, leveling up, save-scumming for legendaries, etc. It's fun to a point, but it always just makes me pine for New Vegas. --- Take me down from the ridge where the summer ends And watch the city spread out just like a jet's flame <cite>Shotgunnova posted [p:975815823] in Was Fallou... [t:80553727]...</cite> <quote>Other than the gunplay and settlement building, it's hard to care too much about it nowadays. The main story is massively underwhelming and the dialogue system sucks, so you're usually just left with manufacturing your own fun by collecting stuff, leveling up, save-scumming for legendaries, etc. It's fun to a point, but it always just makes me pine for New Vegas. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
dummy420 09/02/23 1:28:28 PM #18:	Agonized_rufous posted... VR is really neat. Would rather new Vegas VR but whatever I wish they put even some minor effort into VR. You have to mod it to make it playable. --- Trying is the first step towards failure, so just dont give it a shot and you cant dissapoint. <cite>dummy420 posted [p:975815895] in Was Fallou... [t:80553727]...</cite> <quote>Agonized_rufous posted... </cite><quote>VR is really neat. Would rather new Vegas VR but whatever</quote>I wish they put even some minor effort into VR. You have to mod it to make it playable. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CRON 09/02/23 1:30:01 PM #19:	I was never able to get into it due to how much it crashes. Even with mods I can't really fix that, and my PC is well above the recommended specs. --- Thanks for reading! <cite>CRON posted [p:975815915] in Was Fallou... [t:80553727]...</cite> <quote>I was never able to get into it due to how much it crashes. Even with mods I can't really fix that, and my PC is well above the recommended specs. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
k1zzl3_82 09/02/23 1:35:28 PM #20:	It was fine until you end up doing the same missions over and over again. I ended up having more fun doing that glitch that gets you unlimited build points at that broken stadium. I decked it out with tons of defense and just sat in it shooting anything that came close. I had this really cool rifle I made that I didn't even need VATs for (which I thought was made pointless in this game). It had an amazing scope and I could kill most things in a shot or 2. <cite>k1zzl3_82 posted [p:975816014] in Was Fallou... [t:80553727]...</cite> <quote>It was fine until you end up doing the same missions over and over again. I ended up having more fun doing that glitch that gets you unlimited build points at that broken stadium. I decked it out with tons of defense and just sat in it shooting anything that came close. I had this really cool rifle I made that I didn't even need VATs for (which I thought was made pointless in this game). It had an amazing scope and I could kill most things in a shot or 2.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CADE_FOSTER 09/02/23 1:37:19 PM #21:	Amazing game loved it <cite>CADE_FOSTER posted [p:975816044] in Was Fallou... [t:80553727]...</cite> <quote>Amazing game loved it</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#22	Post #22 was unavailable or deleted.
brestugo 09/02/23 1:40:49 PM #23:	Fin_Dawg_004 posted... I bought it when it came out and played it for around 10-15 hours. I remember thinking it was okay, but just lost interest and never went back to it. I gave it 30-40, but same result. --- Putin delenda est <cite>brestugo posted [p:975816102] in Was Fallou... [t:80553727]...</cite> <quote>Fin_Dawg_004 posted... </cite><quote>I bought it when it came out and played it for around 10-15 hours. I remember thinking it was okay, but just lost interest and never went back to it.</quote>I gave it 30-40, but same result. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
GuerrillaSoldier 09/02/23 1:49:24 PM #24:	no, it's not. even fallout 76 is better and more of a fallout game. it's a linear, pointless, empty, soulless attempt at growing the fallout franchise. but it definitely failed in many ways. railroading, handholding, lack of variety. they thought they were really clever with writing and instead failed miserably. everything in the game means nothing and the main plot is one of bethesda's worse. --- Disclaimer: There's a good chance the above post could be sarcasm. Die-hard Oakland A's fan --- Keep the A's in Oakland! <cite>GuerrillaSoldier posted [p:975816225] in Was Fallou... [t:80553727]...</cite> <quote>no, it's not. even fallout 76 is better and more of a fallout game.it's a linear, pointless, empty, soulless attempt at growing the fallout franchise. but it definitely failed in many ways. railroading, handholding, lack of variety. they thought they were really clever with writing and instead failed miserably. everything in the game means nothing and the main plot is one of bethesda's worse. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
UnfairRepresent 09/02/23 1:51:29 PM #25:	Yeah it was great The criticisms really don't hold water and largely come from the fact it's Bethesda. It's got quality of life improvements on pretty much every factor of Fallout 3/New Vegas If the game was identical but made by CDproject Red, it would be considered a masterpiece by the internet --- ^ Hey now that's completely unfair! http://i.imgur.com/yPw05Ob.png <cite>UnfairRepresent posted [p:975816254] in Was Fallou... [t:80553727]...</cite> <quote>Yeah it was greatThe criticisms really don't hold water and largely come from the fact it's Bethesda. It's got quality of life improvements on pretty much every factor of Fallout 3/New VegasIf the game was identical but made by CDproject Red, it would be considered a masterpiece by the internet </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
RchHomieQuanChi 09/02/23 1:52:19 PM #26:	UnfairRepresent posted... Yeah it was great The criticisms really don't hold water and largely come from the fact it's Bethesda. It's got quality of life improvements on pretty much every factor of Fallout 3/New Vegas If the game was identical but made by CDproject Red, it would be considered a masterpiece by the internet Stop --- I have nothing else to say <cite>RchHomieQuanChi posted [p:975816263] in Was Fallou... [t:80553727]...</cite> <quote>UnfairRepresent posted... </cite><quote>Yeah it was greatThe criticisms really don't hold water and largely come from the fact it's Bethesda. It's got quality of life improvements on pretty much every factor of Fallout 3/New VegasIf the game was identical but made by CDproject Red, it would be considered a masterpiece by the internet</quote>Stop </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ANort175 09/02/23 1:54:47 PM #27:	ellis123 posted... A mediocre RPG that is a good FPS. This --- Are we the baddies? <cite>ANort175 posted [p:975816294] in Was Fallou... [t:80553727]...</cite> <quote>ellis123 posted... </cite><quote>A mediocre RPG that is a good FPS.</quote>This </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
UnfairRepresent 09/02/23 2:02:26 PM #28:	It's true tho The only things I can think of that 3 and NV did better is Have Liam Neeson in it Have skill checks in conversations Edit: Also have Ren Auberjonois in it. FO4 would be dramatically improved with Ren Auberjonois and Liam Neeson kicking about. Massively improved companions Massively improved combat/shooting/weapon modifcation Updated in graphics Massively improved quality of live changes (Ability to leave conversations at any time, looting doesn't open a new screen unless you manually ask it took) The flow is amazing Introduction of a Jet Pack Completely revamped Combat Armor into a whole new game mechanic Actual use for Junk items into core gameplay (Rock-It Launcher doesn't count) Massively improved standards of Voice Acting Increased vareity in map locations and random encounters. Removal of God awful weapon/armor degredation Being able to keep playing the game after completing the main quest Also has less bugs and glitches than 3 and NV did but that's like being the nicest murderer in San Quentin so not really worth mentioning. It's just an all round great game and it's sales and critical reception demonstrate that But it's Bethesda so the internet hates it for reasons that don't stand up to scruntity. It's just an all round incredibly solid game --- ^ Hey now that's completely unfair! http://i.imgur.com/yPw05Ob.png <cite>UnfairRepresent posted [p:975816397] in Was Fallou... [t:80553727]...</cite> <quote>It's true thoThe only things I can think of that 3 and NV did better isHave Liam Neeson in itHave skill checks in conversationsEdit: Also have Ren Auberjonois in it. FO4 would be dramatically improved with Ren Auberjonois and Liam Neeson kicking about.Massively improved companionsMassively improved combat/shooting/weapon modifcation Updated in graphicsMassively improved quality of live changes (Ability to leave conversations at any time, looting doesn't open a new screen unless you manually ask it took) The flow is amazingIntroduction of a Jet PackCompletely revamped Combat Armor into a whole new game mechanicActual use for Junk items into core gameplay (Rock-It Launcher doesn't count)Massively improved standards of Voice ActingIncreased vareity in map locations and random encounters.Removal of God awful weapon/armor degredation Being able to keep playing the game after completing the main questAlso has less bugs and glitches than 3 and NV did but that's like being the nicest murderer in San Quentin so not really worth mentioning.It's just an all round great game and it's sales and critical reception demonstrate thatBut it's Bethesda so the internet hates it for reasons that don't stand up to scruntity. It's just an all round incredibly solid game </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Alteres 09/02/23 2:05:37 PM #29:	ellis123 posted... A mediocre RPG that is a good FPS. Yeah, I dont get this take. The fps part was kinda crap, I still always used vats. If you want rpgish and fps both the destiny(s) had better gunplay play. Not to mention better straight up fps games. I always live those games for leveling, looting, and building a home base. Honestly only ever do quest lines to unlock gear and locations and tend to drop them before finishing if the rewards dry up. Of course the missions being fun/interesting is always a plus. In the Beth fallouts the locations being top notch was generally more important to me than the stories tied to them. --- ........the ghost in the machine... IGN: Fox, FC: 5344-2646-0982 <cite>Alteres posted [p:975816456] in Was Fallou... [t:80553727]...</cite> <quote>ellis123 posted... </cite><quote>A mediocre RPG that is a good FPS.</quote>Yeah, I dont get this take.The fps part was kinda crap, I still always used vats. If you want rpgish and fps both the destiny(s) had better gunplay play. Not to mention better straight up fps games.I always live those games for leveling, looting, and building a home base. Honestly only ever do quest lines to unlock gear and locations and tend to drop them before finishing if the rewards dry up.Of course the missions being fun/interesting is always a plus. In the Beth fallouts the locations being top notch was generally more important to me than the stories tied to them. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Requiem 09/02/23 2:08:22 PM #30:	UnfairRepresent posted... Completely revamped Combat Armor into a whole new game mechanic This was a big one. Power armor always felt like any other armor in previous games. Sure, a little higher DR and weight, looks neat in third person... but essentially just another armor. --- Copyright free literature available at http://www.gutenberg.org/wiki/Main_Page... otherwise known as Tex-Mex <cite>Requiem posted [p:975816496] in Was Fallou... [t:80553727]...</cite> <quote>UnfairRepresent posted... </cite><quote>Completely revamped Combat Armor into a whole new game mechanic</quote>This was a big one.Power armor always felt like any other armor in previous games.Sure, a little higher DR and weight, looks neat in third person... but essentially just another armor. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Vyrulisse 09/02/23 2:09:03 PM #31:	UnfairRepresent posted... It's true tho The only things I can think of that 3 and NV did better is 1. Have Liam Neeson in it 2. Have skill checks in conversations 3. Edit: Also have Ren Auberjonois in it. FO4 would be dramatically improved with Ren Auberjonois and Liam Neeson kicking about. Massively improved companions Massively improved combat/shooting/weapon modifcation Updated in graphics Massively improved quality of live changes (Ability to leave conversations at any time, looting doesn't open a new screen unless you manually ask it took) The flow is amazing Introduction of a Jet Pack Completely revamped Combat Armor into a whole new game mechanic Actual use for Junk items into core gameplay (Rock-It Launcher doesn't count) Massively improved standards of Voice Acting Increased vareity in map locations and random encounters. Removal of God awful weapon/armor degredation Also has less bugs and glitches than 3 and NV did but that's like being the nicest murderer in San Quentin so not really worth mentioning. It's just an all round great game and it's sales and critical reception demonstrate that But it's Bethesda so the internet hates it for reasons that don't stand up to scruntity. It's just an all round incredibly solid game Listen fella you're trying way too hard and this is coming from someone that liked 76. --- http://i.imgur.com/6VeX04D.jpg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZEcqHA7dbwM <cite>Vyrulisse posted [p:975816507] in Was Fallou... [t:80553727]...</cite> <quote>UnfairRepresent posted... </cite><quote>It's true thoThe only things I can think of that 3 and NV did better is1. Have Liam Neeson in it2. Have skill checks in conversations3. Edit: Also have Ren Auberjonois in it. FO4 would be dramatically improved with Ren Auberjonois and Liam Neeson kicking about.Massively improved companionsMassively improved combat/shooting/weapon modifcation Updated in graphicsMassively improved quality of live changes (Ability to leave conversations at any time, looting doesn't open a new screen unless you manually ask it took) The flow is amazingIntroduction of a Jet PackCompletely revamped Combat Armor into a whole new game mechanicActual use for Junk items into core gameplay (Rock-It Launcher doesn't count)Massively improved standards of Voice ActingIncreased vareity in map locations and random encounters.Removal of God awful weapon/armor degredation Also has less bugs and glitches than 3 and NV did but that's like being the nicest murderer in San Quentin so not really worth mentioning.It's just an all round great game and it's sales and critical reception demonstrate thatBut it's Bethesda so the internet hates it for reasons that don't stand up to scruntity. It's just an all round incredibly solid game</quote>Listen fella you're trying way too hard and this is coming from someone that liked 76. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ellis123 09/02/23 2:10:39 PM #32:	Alteres posted... Yeah, I dont get this take. The fps part was kinda crap, I still always used vats. If you want rpgish and fps both the destiny(s) had better gunplay play. Not to mention better straight up fps games. I always live those games for leveling, looting, and building a home base. Honestly only ever do quest lines to unlock gear and locations and tend to drop them before finishing if the rewards dry up. Of course the missions being fun/interesting is always a plus. In the Beth fallouts the locations being top notch was generally more important to me than the stories tied to them. The main distinction is that I would say that Destiny's gunplay isn't good: it's great. "Good" as a distention is a way to say that it is notably better than the average game on that front, and as low of an impression as I have with FO4 (mostly because I only bought it for the RPG aspect) its gunplay was absolutely substantially better than the average game. Similarly if we ignore the good versus great aspect that I mentioned already it's still perfectly fine to have two games with the "good" label while also having one being strictly better on that front than the other. Rating something isn't a "winner takes all" affair where the second that the other thing becomes trash. Otherwise it would be the same as with Destiny as there are plenty of games that I would say that have better FPS aspects than Destiny. --- "A shouted order to do something of dubious morality with an unpredictable outcome? Thweeet!" My FC is in my profile. <cite>ellis123 posted [p:975816530] in Was Fallou... [t:80553727]...</cite> <quote>Alteres posted... </cite><quote>Yeah, I dont get this take.The fps part was kinda crap, I still always used vats. If you want rpgish and fps both the destiny(s) had better gunplay play. Not to mention better straight up fps games.I always live those games for leveling, looting, and building a home base. Honestly only ever do quest lines to unlock gear and locations and tend to drop them before finishing if the rewards dry up.Of course the missions being fun/interesting is always a plus. In the Beth fallouts the locations being top notch was generally more important to me than the stories tied to them.</quote>The main distinction is that I would say that Destiny's gunplay isn't good: it's great. "Good" as a distention is a way to say that it is notably better than the average game on that front, and as low of an impression as I have with FO4 (mostly because I only bought it for the RPG aspect) its gunplay was absolutely substantially better than the average game. Similarly if we ignore the good versus great aspect that I mentioned already it's still perfectly fine to have two games with the "good" label while also having one being strictly better on that front than the other. Rating something isn't a "winner takes all" affair where the second that the other thing becomes trash. Otherwise it would be the same as with Destiny as there are plenty of games that I would say that have better FPS aspects than Destiny. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
UnfairRepresent 09/02/23 2:15:06 PM #33:	Requiem posted... This was a big one. Power armor always felt like any other armor in previous games. Sure, a little higher DR and weight, looks neat in third person... but essentially just another armor. Yeah Fallout 4 really demonstrates how Power Armor was the game changer in the war with China. in Fallout 1-NV it's like "Yeah this armor is nice and all but..." --- ^ Hey now that's completely unfair! http://i.imgur.com/yPw05Ob.png <cite>UnfairRepresent posted [p:975816583] in Was Fallou... [t:80553727]...</cite> <quote>Requiem posted... </cite><quote>This was a big one.Power armor always felt like any other armor in previous games.Sure, a little higher DR and weight, looks neat in third person... but essentially just another armor.</quote>Yeah Fallout 4 really demonstrates how Power Armor was the game changer in the war with China. in Fallout 1-NV it's like "Yeah this armor is nice and all but..." </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
kingdrake2 09/02/23 2:21:13 PM #34:	wish the port to ps5 for fallout 4 would happen only played 3 (actually would take a 3 remaster) over 4. --- beware of sonic <cite>kingdrake2 posted [p:975816666] in Was Fallou... [t:80553727]...</cite> <quote>wish the port to ps5 for fallout 4 would happen only played 3 (actually would take a 3 remaster) over 4. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Southernfatman 09/02/23 2:26:35 PM #35:	4 did make Powerr Armor more interesting, but giving it to you basically right from the get go was a misstep. Made it feel not as special. --- http://i.imgur.com/hslUvRN.jpg When I sin I sin real good. <cite>Southernfatman posted [p:975816746] in Was Fallou... [t:80553727]...</cite> <quote>4 did make Powerr Armor more interesting, but giving it to you basically right from the get go was a misstep. Made it feel not as special. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
kage_53 09/02/23 2:27:09 PM #36:	Its the worst game in series. Not counting stuff like tactics and 76. <cite>kage_53 posted [p:975816756] in Was Fallou... [t:80553727]...</cite> <quote>Its the worst game in series. Not counting stuff like tactics and 76.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
kage_53 09/02/23 2:28:06 PM #37:	Southernfatman posted... 4 did make Powerr Armor more interesting, but giving it to you basically right from the get go was a misstep. Made it feel not as special. You can get power armor in fallout 2 within half an hour. <cite>kage_53 posted [p:975816772] in Was Fallou... [t:80553727]...</cite> <quote>Southernfatman posted... </cite><quote>4 did make Powerr Armor more interesting, but giving it to you basically right from the get go was a misstep. Made it feel not as special.</quote>You can get power armor in fallout 2 within half an hour.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Southernfatman 09/02/23 2:30:42 PM #38:	kage_53 posted... You can get power armor in fallout 2 within half an hour. If you know what you're doing and where to go. They didn't just give it to you after you completed the temple. Outside of save scumming, getting down there to Navarro is challenging as well. --- http://i.imgur.com/hslUvRN.jpg When I sin I sin real good. <cite>Southernfatman posted [p:975816805] in Was Fallou... [t:80553727]...</cite> <quote>kage_53 posted... </cite><quote>You can get power armor in fallout 2 within half an hour.</quote>If you know what you're doing and where to go. They didn't just give it to you after you completed the temple. Outside of save scumming, getting down there to Navarro is challenging as well. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Alteres 09/02/23 2:30:58 PM #39:	Yeah, my wording was vague. When I said not to mention better straight fps I meant games besides destiny (which I only threw in there for the rpg aspects), in other words lots of games that were better fpses if that was your draw, not just best/crap. Also when I said play those games for levels/loot/etc I meant FO3/NV/4. --- ........the ghost in the machine... IGN: Fox, FC: 5344-2646-0982 <cite>Alteres posted [p:975816812] in Was Fallou... [t:80553727]...</cite> <quote>Yeah, my wording was vague. When I said not to mention better straight fps I meant games besides destiny (which I only threw in there for the rpg aspects), in other words lots of games that were better fpses if that was your draw, not just best/crap.Also when I said play those games for levels/loot/etc I meant FO3/NV/4. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
UnfairRepresent 09/02/23 2:32:10 PM #40:	Southernfatman posted... 4 did make Powerr Armor more interesting, but giving it to you basically right from the get go was a misstep. Made it feel not as special. I disagree with this Putting aside how quickly you can get it in other games, unlike the other FO games you play a dude who already has military training and they make out the Power Armor to be a big deal including a dramatic boss fight. They made it feel very special and introduced a great game mechanic to boot. Introduced to the player through both plot and gameplay interwined well. More over I don't see how FO4 would be improved if you didn't get the power armor until after the BOS turned up halfway into the game "To make it more special" --- ^ Hey now that's completely unfair! http://i.imgur.com/yPw05Ob.png <cite>UnfairRepresent posted [p:975816829] in Was Fallou... [t:80553727]...</cite> <quote>Southernfatman posted... </cite><quote>4 did make Powerr Armor more interesting, but giving it to you basically right from the get go was a misstep. Made it feel not as special.</quote>I disagree with thisPutting aside how quickly you can get it in other games, unlike the other FO games you play a dude who already has military training and they make out the Power Armor to be a big deal including a dramatic boss fight. They made it feel very special and introduced a great game mechanic to boot. Introduced to the player through both plot and gameplay interwined well. More over I don't see how FO4 would be improved if you didn't get the power armor until after the BOS turned up halfway into the game "To make it more special" </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Villain_S_Fiend 09/02/23 2:33:23 PM #41:	RchHomieQuanChi posted... Good game, mediocre Fallout game --- The food here is terrible. My steak was so tough it attacked my coffee and the coffee was too weak to defend itself. <cite>Villain_S_Fiend posted [p:975816847] in Was Fallou... [t:80553727]...</cite> <quote>RchHomieQuanChi posted... </cite><quote>Good game, mediocre Fallout game</quote> </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
GuerrillaSoldier 09/02/23 2:34:32 PM #42:	UnfairRepresent posted... a great game mechanic to boot fusion cores are not a great mechanic --- Disclaimer: There's a good chance the above post could be sarcasm. Die-hard Oakland A's fan --- Keep the A's in Oakland! <cite>GuerrillaSoldier posted [p:975816868] in Was Fallou... [t:80553727]...</cite> <quote>UnfairRepresent posted... </cite><quote>a great game mechanic to boot</quote>fusion cores are not a great mechanic </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Ratchetrockon 09/02/23 2:38:51 PM #43:	i couldnt complete a low int (3 or less) unarmed run in fallout 2 without getting the power armour cuz i kept dying in vault 15. i was locked out of most content because of my character's dumbness so i was stuck with either the leather armour or the 1st version of combat armour which doesn't fare well against a bunch of gun wielding raiders. id barely reach one dude to punch before i got shredded. after i got the power armour (took a lot of savescumming cuz i kept running into enclave patrols) i breezed through vault 15. so even in the early games power armour was OP af and super special --- I'm a Taurus. Currently playing: Baldurs Gate 3, Carol Reed Mysteries series, & Spyro 3.5: Return to the Forgotten Realms He/Him <cite>Ratchetrockon posted [p:975816929] in Was Fallou... [t:80553727]...</cite> <quote>i couldnt complete a low int (3 or less) unarmed run in fallout 2 without getting the power armour cuz i kept dying in vault 15. i was locked out of most content because of my character's dumbness so i was stuck with either the leather armour or the 1st version of combat armour which doesn't fare well against a bunch of gun wielding raiders. id barely reach one dude to punch before i got shredded. after i got the power armour (took a lot of savescumming cuz i kept running into enclave patrols) i breezed through vault 15. so even in the early games power armour was OP af and super special </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
UnfairRepresent 09/02/23 2:38:52 PM #44:	GuerrillaSoldier posted... fusion cores are not a great mechanic I agree with you there. They wanted to add something to make it so there was a cost to using Power Armor... Then gave you so many God Damn cores that there was no cost whatsoever. Making the whole thing pointless. You can just feel the design by commitee "We need to have a penalty for using this thing." "Nah the casuals won't like that." "Well let's compromise." You'd lose nothing by removing the Fusion Cores in FO4. They added nothing to the game. But the power armor itself was a great game mechanic. It really changed the shooting, gave you a reason to keep returning to base (Armor degredation actually done well! :O Shocker!) but sacficied speed and mobility. Then you get the jet-pack and don't go back. --- ^ Hey now that's completely unfair! http://i.imgur.com/yPw05Ob.png <cite>UnfairRepresent posted [p:975816930] in Was Fallou... [t:80553727]...</cite> <quote>GuerrillaSoldier posted... </cite><quote>fusion cores are not a great mechanic</quote>I agree with you there.They wanted to add something to make it so there was a cost to using Power Armor... Then gave you so many God Damn cores that there was no cost whatsoever. Making the whole thing pointless.You can just feel the design by commitee "We need to have a penalty for using this thing." "Nah the casuals won't like that." "Well let's compromise."You'd lose nothing by removing the Fusion Cores in FO4. They added nothing to the game.But the power armor itself was a great game mechanic. It really changed the shooting, gave you a reason to keep returning to base (Armor degredation actually done well! :O Shocker!) but sacficied speed and mobility.Then you get the jet-pack and don't go back. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Philip027 09/02/23 2:46:46 PM #45:	It was my first Fallout game and I quite enjoyed it. <cite>Philip027 posted [p:975817056] in Was Fallou... [t:80553727]...</cite> <quote>It was my first Fallout game and I quite enjoyed it.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
NoxObscuras 09/02/23 2:50:08 PM #46:	Fallout 4 is great and I feel that it gets overhated. --- PSN - NoxObscuras Z490 \| i9-10900K \| EVGA 3080 FTW3 Ultra \| 32GB DDR4 3600 \| 4TB SSD <cite>NoxObscuras posted [p:975817120] in Was Fallou... [t:80553727]...</cite> <quote>Fallout 4 is great and I feel that it gets overhated. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CADE_FOSTER 09/02/23 2:55:50 PM #47:	GuerrillaSoldier posted... no, it's not. even fallout 76 is better and more of a fallout game. it's a linear, pointless, empty, soulless attempt at growing the fallout franchise. but it definitely failed in many ways. railroading, handholding, lack of variety. they thought they were really clever with writing and instead failed miserably. everything in the game means nothing and the main plot is one of bethesda's worse. too much crack <cite>CADE_FOSTER posted [p:975817198] in Was Fallou... [t:80553727]...</cite> <quote>GuerrillaSoldier posted... </cite><quote>no, it's not. even fallout 76 is better and more of a fallout game.it's a linear, pointless, empty, soulless attempt at growing the fallout franchise. but it definitely failed in many ways. railroading, handholding, lack of variety. they thought they were really clever with writing and instead failed miserably. everything in the game means nothing and the main plot is one of bethesda's worse.</quote>too much crack</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Payzmaykr 09/02/23 2:56:22 PM #48:	Yes, but it didnt become 10/10 until mods. <cite>Payzmaykr posted [p:975817204] in Was Fallou... [t:80553727]...</cite> <quote>Yes, but it didnt become 10/10 until mods. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Vyrulisse 09/02/23 3:19:19 PM #49:	To be fair to the early power armor in FO4 situation, it's basically a rusted out pile of shit. Plus at that point maintaining it and ammo for the minigun should be a difficult task. --- http://i.imgur.com/6VeX04D.jpg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZEcqHA7dbwM <cite>Vyrulisse posted [p:975817559] in Was Fallou... [t:80553727]...</cite> <quote>To be fair to the early power armor in FO4 situation, it's basically a rusted out pile of shit. Plus at that point maintaining it and ammo for the minigun should be a difficult task. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
NoxObscuras 09/02/23 4:24:35 PM #50:	Southernfatman posted... 4 did make Powerr Armor more interesting, but giving it to you basically right from the get go was a misstep. Made it feel not as special. I've seen this sentiment a lot when people list negatives about Fallout 4. But I see it as just an introduction to what you could have. Like how some RPG's start you off at level 100 only to rip away all of your power after the intro. Give you a taste of late game content so you can look forward to it. They give you power armor right away, but it takes a while before you can actually use it regularly. --- PSN - NoxObscuras Z490 \| i9-10900K \| EVGA 3080 FTW3 Ultra \| 32GB DDR4 3600 \| 4TB SSD <cite>NoxObscuras posted [p:975818610] in Was Fallou... [t:80553727]...</cite> <quote>Southernfatman posted... </cite><quote>4 did make Powerr Armor more interesting, but giving it to you basically right from the get go was a misstep. Made it feel not as special.</quote>I've seen this sentiment a lot when people list negatives about Fallout 4. But I see it as just an introduction to what you could have. Like how some RPG's start you off at level 100 only to rip away all of your power after the intro. Give you a taste of late game content so you can look forward to it. They give you power armor right away, but it takes a while before you can actually use it regularly. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2

Current Events > Was Fallout 4 Good? (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Was Fallout 4 Good?