According to the link above, Bard is still 30x less used compared to ChatGPT. I've used both extensively and honestly, both produce about the same results. Except Bard DOES edge out with a few advantages.
It's more human-like in its responses. In comparison, Chatgpt feels like it just pulled all its shit from Wikipedia and tosses one big chunk of info at you.
Bard is in real-time, ChatGPT isn't.
Of course, I'm only comparing ChatGPT3 to Bard, not GPT4 but I'm sure most people whose companies didnt endorse OpenAI cant use ChatGPT4 either anyway. In such a case, Bard does prove more useful compared to free GPT3.It's really not a bad AI and just got bad rep from the mishap in Google's initial presentation.
Yeah but it hasnt improved at all since. All efforts seem to go only toward GPT4 and whatever future release comes next. GPT3 is seriously flawed and held back for finding information on anything due to its time cap. At best, it can just serve as a writing cheat tool
There are a few reasons why less people use Bard compared to ChatGPT.
Bard is newer. ChatGPT has been around for longer, so it has had more time to build up a user base. Bard is still under development, so it may not be as polished or as user-friendly as ChatGPT.
Bard is more limited in its availability. ChatGPT is available to anyone who wants to use it, but Bard is currently only available to a limited number of people. This is because Bard is still in beta testing, and Google is gradually rolling it out to more users.
Bard is more focused on research. Bard is designed to be a research tool, while ChatGPT is more focused on generating creative content. This means that Bard may not be as well-suited for some tasks, such as writing poems or stories.
However, there are also some advantages to using Bard. For example, Bard is able to access and process information from the real world through Google Search, which means that it can provide more up-to-date information than ChatGPT. Additionally, Bard is able to learn and improve over time, which means that it may become more powerful and useful in the future.
Overall, both Bard and ChatGPT are powerful language models with their own strengths and weaknesses. The best choice for you will depend on your specific needs and preferences.
As of my last knowledge update in September 2021, ChatGPT (GPT-3.5) and Bard were both AI language models developed by OpenAI, but there might have been changes or developments in the AI landscape beyond that point. However, if we consider why ChatGPT might have been more popular than Bard up until that time, there are several potential reasons:
Availability and Exposure: ChatGPT was more widely available to the public, while Bard might have been a more restricted or limited release. As a result, ChatGPT received more exposure and usage by developers and users across different applications and platforms.
Model Features and Use Cases: ChatGPT was designed specifically to facilitate conversation and generate natural language responses, making it more suitable for chatbot-like interactions. On the other hand, Bard may have been designed for a different set of use cases or applications, possibly making it less relevant or accessible to the general public.
Model Performance and Training Data: ChatGPT was built on the GPT-3 architecture, which represented the cutting edge of language models at the time. It had been trained on vast amounts of data, making it more powerful and capable in terms of generating human-like text. Bard, being a different model, might not have matched ChatGPT's performance or scale.
Marketing and Branding: OpenAI may have focused more on marketing and promoting ChatGPT, leading to greater awareness and adoption within the AI community and beyond. A strong brand and marketing strategy can significantly impact the popularity of a product.
Community and Ecosystem: The existence of a robust developer community, providing resources, tutorials, and tools around ChatGPT, could have contributed to its popularity. This support ecosystem can foster adoption and make it easier for developers to integrate the model into their applications.
Cost and Accessibility: The pricing and accessibility of the models might have been different. If ChatGPT was more affordable or offered free usage tiers for experimentation, it could have attracted more users.
Remember, this information is based on the situation as of September 2021, and developments may have occurred since then. For the most up-to-date information, I recommend checking the latest news and updates from OpenAI or other relevant sources.
Same reason people will leave Netflix subs run while they aren't watching it, fight with people on the Internet over which console/GPU is superior, and even buy exclusively x and y brand of foods without even trying competitors.
They were there first and triggered that little brand loyalty feeling.