Current Events > Matt Walsh get bodies by congress.

(+) Yeah! (+)

https://twitter.com/conureCC/status/1623692200549969922

That was absolutely delicious lmao

Every single fucking time these assholes get their own statements read back to them it's "That's a mischaracterization!" "Taken out of context!" "Not what I meant!"

And then you listen to the actual statement in full in context and it's actually even worse...

UnfairRepresent posted...

Every single fucking time these assholes get their own statements read back to them it's "That's a mischaracterization!" "Taken out of context!" "Not what I meant!"

And then you listen to the actual statement in full in context and it's actually even worse...

FAKE NEWS
That was your entire quo-
FAKE NEWS

While I appreciate what these dudes are doing, no one who listens buys into Walsh's shit is going to have their mind changed by this. They didn't logic themselves into their views, you aren't going to use logic to get them out. But it's always entertaining to watch morons get reminded that they are full of shit.

ScazarMeltex posted...

While I appreciate what these dudes are doing, no one who listens buys into Walsh's shit is going to have their mind changed by this. They didn't logic themselves into their views, you aren't going to use logic to get them out. But it's always entertaining to watch morons get reminded that they are full of shit.

you're not wrong, but the real reason to keep doing it anyway is to get to the people who haven't made up their minds yet.

ScazarMeltex posted...

While I appreciate what these dudes are doing, no one who listens buys into Walsh's shit is going to have their mind changed by this. They didn't logic themselves into their views, you aren't going to use logic to get them out. But it's always entertaining to watch morons get reminded that they are full of shit.

poopooing a video of matt walsh getting cooked. just enjoy it.

I got like fifteen seconds into that.

The fact that Walsh uses that "Internet Smart Guy" tone against elected officials is so indicative of his opinion of anyone not himself.

CyricZ posted...

I got like fifteen seconds into that.

The fact that Walsh uses that "Internet Smart Guy" tone against elected officials is so indicative of his opinion of anyone not himself.

Dude needs to be dealt with the same way Richard Spencer was.

CyricZ posted...

I got like fifteen seconds into that.

The fact that Walsh uses that "Internet Smart Guy" tone against elected officials is so indicative of his opinion of anyone not himself.

yeah I noticed he dropped that tone pretty quick after his I use my brain to read the data line

I know his name mostly through CE so I watched the video... the "girls should be pregnant at 16" made me quit

Weird if you wonder over to right wing media, they're claiming this is a win for Walsh.

Suolevram posted...

Weird if you wonder over to right wing media, they're claiming this is a win for Walsh.

Morbidly curious as to the reasoning...

Ruvan22 posted...

Morbidly curious as to the reasoning...

Just managing to successfully breathe is considered a win.

Seems like a lot of ad hominem to me. Not sure what bodying it is.

Not a fan of Matt Walsh so don't start

All of a sudden, you don't look so smart when you are not debatting 19 years-old College kids.

It seems like a common thing for the right-wing heroes.

Bodies by Congress sounds like a fragrance

Squall28 posted...

Seems like a lot of ad hominem to me. Not sure what bodying it is.

Not a fan of Matt Walsh so don't start

You think it is an ad hominem to ask someone there make ground qhen they are saying medical experts are wrong. Then we he says it isn't medical then be switched to this is just about policies to bring up he advocates for killing drug dealers and beating people bloody?

cjsdowg posted...

You think it is an ad hominem to ask someone there make ground qhen they are saying medical experts are wrong. Then we he says it isn't medical then be switched to this is just about policies to bring up he advocates for killing drug dealers and beating people bloody?

Ad hominem is attacking the person, not the argument. The clip is them attacking his credentials, not his argument.

You can add some appeal to authority in there as well.

You love to see it

Squall28 posted...

Ad hominem is attacking the person, not the argument. The clip is them attacking his credentials, not his argument.

You can add some appeal to authority in there as well.

"You see, this is why I am correct about medicine."

"To clarify, you know fuck-all about medicine."

"That is correct."

You don't actually have to entertain the stupid fucking argument at that point.

Squall28 posted...

Ad hominem is attacking the person, not the argument. The clip is them attacking his credentials, not his argument.

You can add some appeal to authority in there as well.

You should have credentials when you make medical claims.

Squall28 posted...

Ad hominem is attacking the person, not the argument. The clip is them attacking his credentials, not his argument.

You can add some appeal to authority in there as well.

he has no argument because he has no medical credentials and is just pulling opinions out his ass

I really wish we could get away from this place where people think their ignorance is just as good as other people's expertise.

If his argument was invalid, they could easily have disproved it with actual facts and logic. Maybe even educate the populace on the matter so they understand. And maybe they did. We weren't shown the whole clip.

Just know the segment you guys chose to cheer over doesn't amount to anything.

Squall28 posted...

If his argument was invalid, they could easily have disproved it with actual facts and logic. Maybe even educate the populace on the matter so they understand.

You realize we're talking about MAGA.

Did you unironically say elected officials shoud pwn their opponents with facts and logic?

Squall28 posted...

If his argument was invalid, they could easily have disproved it with actual facts and logic. Maybe even educate the populace on the matter so they understand. And maybe they did. We weren't shown the whole clip.

Just know the segment you guys chose to cheer over doesn't amount to anything.

They did. It took about 7 seconds in that clip

BurmesePenguin posted...

Did you unironically say elected officials shoud pwn their opponents with facts and logic?

Is the facts and logic thing a conservative meme?

I watched the clip

Its just a buncha dudes asking questions and often times the back and forth is edited out.

Like, the final exchange. I actually do think the dude misrepresented what Walsh said. As he never said at 16, you should be married and pregnant.

At least according to the audio played afterwards.

People online have like no ability to even care about full context. Like, I only know Walsh because he made that what is a woman documentary thing.

Besides coming off like a pompous dude, I didnt really get a good grasp of whats wrong?

cuttin_in_farm posted...

I watched the clip

Its just a buncha dudes asking questions and often times the back and forth is edited out.

Like, the final exchange. I actually do think the dude misrepresented what Walsh said. As he never said at 16, you should be married and pregnant.

At least according to the audio played afterwards.

People online have like no ability to even care about full context. Like, I only know Walsh because he made that what is a woman documentary thing.

Besides coming off like a pompous dude, I didnt really get a good grasp of whats wrong?

Matt Walsh is an ignorant moron who doesn't have a single opinion or viewpoint based in fact or science.
He's a concern troll who longs for the 1950s when women and minorities did whatever the men in power told them to.
He's disgusting and so is anyone who follows him.

Squall28 posted...

If his argument was invalid, they could easily have disproved it with actual facts and logic.

Yeah, because Chuds are widely known to be susceptible to facts or logic. Get the fuck outta here.

Squall28 posted...

If his argument was invalid, they could easily have disproved it with actual facts and logic. Maybe even educate the populace on the matter so they understand. And maybe they did. We weren't shown the whole clip.

Just know the segment you guys chose to cheer over doesn't amount to anything.

Crikey mates! We got a live one! A real debate lord in the wild! This one's gonna be a real bugger I tell ya!

Someone speaking at a hearing in front of elected officials should be there to convince them entirely.

It is not a place of a speaker making a claim and then asking of the elected official, "debate me bro, prove me wrong". No elected official is required to prove Matt Walsh wrong.

CyricZ posted...

Someone speaking at a hearing in front of elected officials should be there to convince them entirely.

It is not a place of a speaker making a claim and then asking of the elected official, "debate me bro, prove me wrong". No elected official is required to prove Matt Walsh wrong.

*Appealing before the Supreme Court*

"I'm totally in the right bro, change my mind."

*sips a nice hot mug of smug*

... ...alright, bad example, that tactic might genuinely outwit the current SCOTUS.

Prestoff posted...

Is the facts and logic thing a conservative meme?

More a Libertarian one, but as both are the same thing in everything but name you are correct in your understanding.

Suolevram posted...

Weird if you wonder over to right wing media, they're claiming this is a win for Walsh.

Those clowns would claim Trump getting KO'd in a boxing match was a win for Trump.

Nice to see my shitty, shitty state doing something right for a change. If only any part of it besides the area directly around Nashville was fucking Blue.

meestermj posted...

Matt Walsh is an ignorant moron who doesn't have a single opinion or viewpoint based in fact or science.
He's a concern troll who longs for the 1950s when women and minorities did whatever the men in power told them to.
He's disgusting and so is anyone who follows him.

Why was this in response to me?

cuttin_in_farm posted...

Why was this in response to me?

Just an overall statement.
Particularly your use of the phras8ng "if his argument wasn't valid", it isn't valid. It never has been and never will be. Also seems your not overly familiar with him.

meestermj posted...

Just an overall statement.
Particularly your use of the phras8ng "if his argument wasn't valid", it isn't valid. It never has been and never will be. Also seems your not overly familiar with him.

Gotcha.

cuttin_in_farm posted...

I watched the clip

Its just a buncha dudes asking questions and often times the back and forth is edited out.

Like, the final exchange. I actually do think the dude misrepresented what Walsh said. As he never said at 16, you should be married and pregnant.

At least according to the audio played afterwards.

People online have like no ability to even care about full context. Like, I only know Walsh because he made that what is a woman documentary thing.

Besides coming off like a pompous dude, I didnt really get a good grasp of whats wrong?

Are you asking "What's wrong with his statement about being pregnant at 16?" or "What's wrong with his statements in general?"

Ruvan22 posted...

Are you asking "What's wrong with his statement about being pregnant at 16?" or "What's wrong with his statements in general?"

Moreso the latter. I cant follow the conversation in the twitter compilation well because every time someone bodies him, the video cuts away from the retort.

Walsh comes off like a pompous debate bro, but I cant really see where hes getting bodied?

Like the first interaction:

Walsh defensively answers he didnt go to school, but can read. Douche answer.

The Clemmons guy apparently suggests his purpose is to get clicks? Walsh parrots the question back and then it jump cuts.

so Matt Walsh got Matt Washed...

cuttin_in_farm posted...

Moreso the latter. I cant follow the conversation in the twitter compilation well because every time someone bodies him, the video cuts away from the retort.

Walsh comes off like a pompous debate bro, but I cant really see where hes getting bodied?

Like the first interaction:

Walsh defensively answers he didnt go to school, but can read. Douche answer.

The Clemmons guy apparently suggests his purpose is to get clicks? Walsh parrots the question back and then it jump cuts.

Despite the jump cuts, it seems pretty obvious congress is questioning the statements he makes on his channel, right? So if you aren't sure "what's wrong with his statements", a quick Wiki shows -

*Walsh argued that ozone depletion and acid rain were never serious problems,
*He called anime "satanic" in an answer to viewers' questions in one of his videos, adding "I have no argument for why it's satanic. It just seems that way to me."[41][42] He has called multiculturalism a "failed experiment".
* In May 2021, Walsh called doctors who perform gender-reassignment surgeries for transgender youth "Nazi scientist-evil", "pedophiles", and "plastic surgeons basically acting like Leatherface from The Texas Chain Saw Massacre,"[65][8] Walsh's views are in opposition to the stance of leading American medical groups, which have established guidelines to treat transgender youth; those groups and some research say that denying such care can lead to higher rates of suicide and other mental health issues.(why he was asked about medical credentials)
*Walsh condemned the U.S. Supreme Court case Obergefell v. Hodges, which ruled that the U.S. Constitution guaranteed the right to marriage for same-sex couples, arguing that "a union between two homosexuals is not, never has been, and never will be a legitimate marriage", while insinuating that the ruling will set marriage to become "an institution populated by all forms of depravity and corruption".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matt_Walsh_(political_commentator)