Current Events > Why did the live action LOTR movies come out BEFORE The Hobbit?

Topic List	Page List: 1
Cheater87 02/08/23 9:27:47 PM #1:	Watching Fellowship of the Ring on Netflix. --- Doom, the game with unlimited ways to play. <cite>Cheater87 posted [p:971431435] in Why did th... [t:80341289]...</cite> <quote>Watching Fellowship of the Ring on Netflix. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
VeggetaX 02/08/23 9:35:58 PM #2:	Because LOTR is the main serious shit and The Hobbit is supposed to be a children's book. --- Don't like it? Don't watch it. It's that simple Dictator of Nice Guys <cite>VeggetaX posted [p:971431674] in Why did th... [t:80341289]...</cite> <quote>Because LOTR is the main serious shit and The Hobbit is supposed to be a children's book.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
RISEofCHRISTIAN 02/08/23 9:36:50 PM #3:	Why did Star Wars Eppys IV, V, VI come out BEFORE Eppys I, II, III? --- Trump 2024 #magaa <cite>RISEofCHRISTIAN posted [p:971431697] in Why did th... [t:80341289]...</cite> <quote>Why did Star Wars Eppys IV, V, VI come out BEFORE Eppys I, II, III?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
EmbraceOfDeath 02/08/23 9:40:30 PM #4:	RISEofCHRISTIAN posted... Why did Star Wars Eppys IV, V, VI come out BEFORE Eppys I, II, III? Well The Hobbit was the first book though. I'd guess due to how short it is and how it's a much smaller scale story. --- No more shall man have wings to bear him to paradise. Henceforth, he shall walk. <cite>EmbraceOfDeath posted [p:971431787] in Why did th... [t:80341289]...</cite> <quote>RISEofCHRISTIAN posted... </cite><quote>Why did Star Wars Eppys IV, V, VI come out BEFORE Eppys I, II, III?</quote>Well The Hobbit was the first book though. I'd guess due to how short it is and how it's a much smaller scale story.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#5	Post #5 was unavailable or deleted.
Patchwork 02/08/23 9:45:11 PM #6:	Hobbit isnt as entertaining and LOTR has more iconic characters. --- The mind is its own place, and in itself Can make a heav'n of hell, a hell of heav'n. <cite>Patchwork posted [p:971431896] in Why did th... [t:80341289]...</cite> <quote>Hobbit isnt as entertaining and LOTR has more iconic characters.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ArchNemo 02/08/23 9:52:21 PM #7:	Because when you're trying to start a film franchise you don't start with the weakest entry. --- Down with the Signess. <cite>ArchNemo posted [p:971432054] in Why did th... [t:80341289]...</cite> <quote>Because when you're trying to start a film franchise you don't start with the weakest entry.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Billyionaire 02/08/23 9:54:25 PM #8:	Because the Lotr book came before hobbit of course --- There is no excellent beauty that hath not strangeness in the proportion. - Francis Bacon <cite>Billyionaire posted [p:971432113] in Why did th... [t:80341289]...</cite> <quote>Because the Lotr book came before hobbit of course</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
rodu_jr 02/08/23 10:15:27 PM #9:	Billyionaire posted... Because the Lotr book came before hobbit of course Hobbit came out almost two decades prior <cite>rodu_jr posted [p:971432716] in Why did th... [t:80341289]...</cite> <quote>Billyionaire posted... </cite><quote>Because the Lotr book came before hobbit of course</quote>Hobbit came out almost two decades prior</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Vyrulisse 02/08/23 10:16:21 PM #10:	The Hobbit was a cash grab by the studio that Peter Jackson wasn't really passionate about and it showed. Why do you think they stretched three films out of a single book? --- http://i.imgur.com/6VeX04D.jpg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9E_jJOPpSXY <cite>Vyrulisse posted [p:971432738] in Why did th... [t:80341289]...</cite> <quote>The Hobbit was a cash grab by the studio that Peter Jackson wasn't really passionate about and it showed. Why do you think they stretched three films out of a single book?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Giant_Aspirin 02/08/23 10:22:04 PM #11:	Vyrulisse posted... The Hobbit was a cash grab by the studio that Peter Jackson wasn't really passionate about and it showed. Why do you think they stretched three films out of a single book? this. the studio saw $$ from LotR and wanted more of that --- I hope something good happens to you today Playing: Cuphead DLC <cite>Giant_Aspirin posted [p:971432896] in Why did th... [t:80341289]...</cite> <quote>Vyrulisse posted... </cite><quote>The Hobbit was a cash grab by the studio that Peter Jackson wasn't really passionate about and it showed. Why do you think they stretched three films out of a single book?</quote>this. the studio saw $$ from LotR and wanted more of that</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
pfh1001 02/08/23 10:24:40 PM #12:	Vyrulisse posted... The Hobbit was a cash grab by the studio that Peter Jackson wasn't really passionate about and it showed. Why do you think they stretched three films out of a single book? So much this. The first Hobbit movie was 9 fucking chapters of the book, well under 100 pages, and I knew the others were going to be even worse... and I was right. <cite>pfh1001 posted [p:971432946] in Why did th... [t:80341289]...</cite> <quote>Vyrulisse posted...</cite><quote>The Hobbit was a cash grab by the studio that Peter Jackson wasn't really passionate about and it showed. Why do you think they stretched three films out of a single book?</quote>So much this. The first Hobbit movie was 9 fucking chapters of the book, well under 100 pages, and I knew the others were going to be even worse... and I was right.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#13	Post #13 was unavailable or deleted.
Topic List	Page List: 1

Current Events > Why did the live action LOTR movies come out BEFORE The Hobbit? (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Why did the live action LOTR movies come out BEFORE The Hobbit?