Current Events > Kevin McCarthy takes power, first to do fire people.

(+) Yeah! (+)

You can't fire someone who was never hired...

This only eliminates funding for new irs agents. Not existing ones.

You can't fire someone who was never hired...

This only eliminates funding for new irs agents. Not existing ones.

God forbid we actually enforce tax law

I feel like the argument not too long ago was that new irs agents would be going after the ultra wealthy. Now you confirm that we will also being going after waitresses. Thank you for being honest.

Well, there are a lot of people like waitresses who don't properly report taxes. We've had discussions where they benefit from not being made minimum wage and living in a murky water of sorts. I can only assume you want to crack down on this behavior, what with enforcing the tax code, and what not.

Well, there are a lot of people like waitresses who don't properly report taxes. We've had discussions where they benefit from not being made minimum wage and living in a murky water of sorts. I can only assume you want to crack down on this behavior, what with enforcing the tax code, and what not.

You know what they say about assumptions.

If someone says they want to enforce the law, and hire 37000 employees to do it, and they don't elaborate further, I'm left with properly interpreting the english they write down.

If someone says they want to enforce the law, and hire 37000 employees to do it, and they don't elaborate further, I'm left with properly interpreting the english they write down.

Key word being properly, which you are continuously failing to do. You can avoid this by shutting the fuck up.

i don't even know what these adhom attacks even mean. Please treat me as a boomer and annunciate your meaning. Thank you.

shutting the fuck up.

If someone says they want to enforce the law, and hire 37000 employees to do it, and they don't elaborate further, I'm left with properly interpreting the english they write down.

Please treat me as a boomer

Imo you should not give the troll the attention they want.

Problem is you're being deliberately obtuse. The necessity for more IRS agents does not stem from taxpayers at the bottom of the totem pole. Any such audit is simple and straightforward. The need for more agents is entirely based on the complexities and absurd legal devices that permit opaque movement and manipulation of wealth by those taxpayers at the top of the totem pole.

The super rich are notorious for earning over $600

Actually, I wouldn't be surprised if super rich would entirely avoid being audited by that rule because of the way they keep assets held in everything accept traditional banking and traditional transactions.

You only make yourself look like that. Everyone who is objective can easily see what the administration and the treasury wants to do. You don't change these facts with your adhom attacks. Thank you.

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/Rv5d8r4dTiU

I understand that your mind is clouded from your quest to destroy the republican party, but you must understand that some of us wish to be objective. Thank you, have a nice day.

Sure, Jan.

you should be embarrassed

I understand that your mind is clouded from your quest to destroy the republican party, but you must understand that some of us wish to be objective. Thank you, have a nice day.

I understand that your mind is clouded from your quest to destroy the republican party, but you must understand that some of us wish to be objective. Thank you, have a nice day.

Because a troll is getting flustered? Nah.

We cannot have an objective government, when the nominally "conservative" party is full of religious zealots.

What is there to be flustered about? Anyone who has said anything of substance in this topic is either somewhat agreeing with me or has made a single post and failed to return. You are the only one who appears to be trolling.

Direct question, do you disagree that in May of 2021, the administration proposed auditing any bank account transaction of $600 or more?

Follow up, do you agree that some poor and middle class would ultimately be harmed by such a rule?

Follow up, do you agree that in all likelihood, rich people will still somehow avoid paying taxes?

I don't mean to take the side of republicans. I only mean that some posters, like Heine, are so dedicated to their own side that they will refuse to ever criticize any bad ideas that come from it.

Can I just ask what it means to look at the republican party in an objective light looks like from you?