Current Events > The Media is a doing it's rounds to support Amber Heard ?

(+) Yeah! (+)

SHRlKE posted...

Worth bearing in mind this was a case about defamation. And not necessarily whether he ever abused her or not. He lost in the UK against the papers because he had abused her and they only had to find one instance of him abusing her to rule in the papers favour.

The heard case was about the extent to which he was abusing her and about its that were made. Depp still lost one of the verdicts and had to pay Amber 2 million.

From whats Ive seen while Heard is obviously the one who did more harm depp isnt 100% innocent and there are still things he did that were questionable. No one should come out of this case well.

There is just so much wrong with you typed. I am not saying this to be mean, because I don't blame you. I blame these bad reporting that have left you just so wrong about this situation. For example in the US case, it was said point blank if you find that he abused her even once , she wins.

UR is a right in his post, about this case.

Why are people complaining about the trial being a media circus?

Welcome to America, people.

If people are concerned about the potential effects this could have on women coming forward about SA then they should aim those concerns at Heard, that lying bitchwolf is responsible for this and nobody else.

I'm just glad her career and reputation are destroyed.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

You're probably right but unlike the OJ simpson trial, I don't think it effected the verdict.

It's not like the cameras made Amber Heard lie and not have any evidence.