Poll of the Day > Celebrities are starting to take sides on the Johnny vs Amber trial.

(+) Yeah! (+)

Also... that's a whole lot of perjury. Virginia will likely be next.

https://twitter.com/tasteofsanity/status/1527323913663152130?s=20&t=W1F2hKyaq50zehPqhSVFMw

One of Amber Heards former co-stars is standing with her.

In a series of posts on his Instagram Story, actor David Krumholtz spoke out about the ongoing trial involving Heard and her ex-husband Johnny Depp, whom she has accused of physical and sexual abuse.

Controversial opinion Krumholtz began. Amber Heard is a victim of abuse by Johnny Depp. Dont ya just love his work? Isnt he handsome? Heard hes a sweetheart! Captain Jack Sparrow!!!

He continued, Drugs and alcohol turn men into monsters. I believe Amber Heard.

Eva Green, one of Johnny Depp's former costars, is confident the actor will clear his name in his trial against ex-wife Amber Heard, who has testified about his alleged domestic violence and sexual assault.

Green, 41, who costarred with Depp in the 2012 movie Dark Shadows, supported the actor on Instagram Thursday. She wrote alongside a throwback photo of herself with him, "I have no doubt Johnny will emerge with his good name and wonderful heart revealed to the world, and life will be better than it ever was for him and his family."

Depp fans have also resurfaced on social media Helena Bonham Carter's previous comments defending her frequent costar. Back in October 2020 a month before he lost his U.K. libel trial against The Sun for calling him a "wife-beater" she told The Guardian she was surprised by the allegations against Depp. Carter, 55, added at the time, "None of it makes sense. But the man's not stupid. He wouldn't have gone to this length if he thought he was in the wrong."

I support them both getting beaten up and thrown in prison for two years where they can think about how annoying they are

#metoo + feminism = #mentoo

a lot of people dont expect it but the math checks out

but math is racist

https://twitter.com/ca_divorce/status/1527376932358148096?s=21&t=4AgM8VVDjie0AIO8B9GjGw

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/8/5/5/AAejdGAADPun.jpg

I find it gross that opinion on social media is meant to be valuable in a court case. I don't know what's right here, but this is some fucked up post-truth shit.

Well, Heard's team was trying to prove damages by showing how much negativity there was to Amber Heard due to the alleged leaking defamatory documents by Johnny's lawyer. Although, the whole thing backfired, since as the graph clearly showed, people were far less interested in bashing Heard, but rather were super interested in supporting Depp. Infact, the witness even said he changed the scale of the graph to try to mitigate the peaks for #justiceforjohnny, otherwise the johnny supporters would drown out all else. The whole segment was an absolute trainwreck, as it was confusing and all it really did was show a sequestered jury how much support there is for Depp on the internet, despite the guy being Heard's expert witness. Although, it was hillarious hearing lawyers repeatedly talk about "Amber turd" in the court room.

This is basically my take:
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/3/0/9/AAUdByAADQU9.png

I'm tired of people acting like they know what is 'correct' in this big garbage-heap. It was remarkable how quickly all media and social media began pushing this shit on us.

I find it gross that opinion on social media is meant to be valuable in a court case. I don't know what's right here, but this is some fucked up post-truth shit.

Honestly, the you say that about the whole day.

I mean Heard's team start with questioning Johnny's former lawyer where they ask objectionable questions for about 45 minutes straight and when they finally ask questions that Johnny's lawyer can answer he drops that the purjury case for Heard is still on going and that he handed the officers "A binder full of purjerious documents". So that blew up in thier face. Although, the jury may have been asleep by then.

Graph guy was next, but we already described him.

Then you had the lawyer that drafted Heard's op ed. After citing his credentials for nearly ten minutes, he stated that the op ed he drafted should've been completely, totally defamatory proof, since he is some mega super defamation lawyer. Welp, hope Heard can get a refund on that one.

Next, we got an old geezer phycologist that didn't remember Depp as a patient (how can't remember Depp as your patient?) and spend his testimony going through his notes & speaking in stream of consciousness. It was pretty weird.

They called Depp's former sex buddy from twenty years to try to get evidence of physical abuse, but the worst she could dredge up was Depp tossing a wine bottle at the ground that injured no one and erm, he was worried about people cheating on him. What a violent maniac we have here.

Finally we had Heard's agent that stated that Heard didn't lose her Aquaman contract or any contracts for that matter & tried to convince the jury that somehow Aquaman was a critically acclaimed masterpiece or something and should've earned Heard a bigger paycheck and that her inability to leverage Aquaamaaan for a bigger contract is evidence of Depps defamation affecting her. I mean I guess, Depp an A lister lost 50 million from the cancellation of his pirates contract and has been essentially canceled from Hollywood, but if you want to convince us that Heard is being discriminated against because she can leverage her Aquaman role into a bigger career be our guest.

Yeah, that whole saga was exasperating. I mean it was absurd to expect Waldman to violate attorney client privileges & open himself up to potential lawsuits, so even though the defense thought they where being suave by trying to make Waldman look evasive, all it really did was gain them the enmity of the people watching the trial, as it was unnecessary and came across as underhanded.

This will never stop being weird. Like, how does that even make sense? There are so many holes, contradictions, and oddities in her story.

https://twitter.com/ca_divorce/status/1524932595061886976?s=21&t=RN2T9JMRgHpqjS5QB6NSZw

And of course none of the abuse is substantiated by witnesses despite there being numerous staff, body guards & a literal coven of witches and associated squatters that resided in Depp's home, It is pretty much Schrdinger's domestic violence. It evidently exists, but no one has seen it. The Heard supporters pretty much have to resort to a vast conspiracy orchestrated by Depp to bribe all the police, doctors & numerous in house witnesses to explain why there is no evidence of physcial violence committed by Depp against heard. It's pretty bad.

SuperModel Kate Moss will testify for Johnny Depp:

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/kate-moss-testify-johnny-depp-amber-heard-trial-163722350.html

https://twitter.com/depplyhaIIows/status/1528760860814069761?s=20&t=TO0EnjHFogzOC6JHjYJQew

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/0/6/6/AAaB-xAADQwa.jpg

Yesterday, was immensely entertaining with that crazy phycologist dude. The bitch does not even comb his hair before taking the stand and looks like he just got done touching a Van De Graff generator.
He then straight up violates the GoldWater rule by psychoanalyzing Depp through the TV Dr. Drew style and argues how everyone does it. Then makes some of the most spurious opinions I have ever seen: "Depp has narcissistic personality disorder because he is sueing Heard." So, sueing for legitimate concerns is a mental illness now? It was absurd. I don't know where Heard even finds these people.

Uh oh.

https://twitter.com/bigbossboze/status/1529544124533194754?s=21&t=NNZiLAycFwUQY6kknXHQgA

ruined her acting career