I mean Heard's team start with questioning Johnny's former lawyer where they ask objectionable questions for about 45 minutes straight and when they finally ask questions that Johnny's lawyer can answer he drops that the purjury case for Heard is still on going and that he handed the officers "A binder full of purjerious documents". So that blew up in thier face. Although, the jury may have been asleep by then.
Graph guy was next, but we already described him.
Then you had the lawyer that drafted Heard's op ed. After citing his credentials for nearly ten minutes, he stated that the op ed he drafted should've been completely, totally defamatory proof, since he is some mega super defamation lawyer. Welp, hope Heard can get a refund on that one.
Next, we got an old geezer phycologist that didn't remember Depp as a patient (how can't remember Depp as your patient?) and spend his testimony going through his notes & speaking in stream of consciousness. It was pretty weird.
They called Depp's former sex buddy from twenty years to try to get evidence of physical abuse, but the worst she could dredge up was Depp tossing a wine bottle at the ground that injured no one and erm, he was worried about people cheating on him. What a violent maniac we have here.
Finally we had Heard's agent that stated that Heard didn't lose her Aquaman contract or any contracts for that matter & tried to convince the jury that somehow Aquaman was a critically acclaimed masterpiece or something and should've earned Heard a bigger paycheck and that her inability to leverage Aquaamaaan for a bigger contract is evidence of Depps defamation affecting her. I mean I guess, Depp an A lister lost 50 million from the cancellation of his pirates contract and has been essentially canceled from Hollywood, but if you want to convince us that Heard is being discriminated against because she can leverage her Aquaman role into a bigger career be our guest.