LogFAQs > #965213468

ReturnOfFa posted...

I find it gross that opinion on social media is meant to be valuable in a court case. I don't know what's right here, but this is some fucked up post-truth shit.

Well, Heard's team was trying to prove damages by showing how much negativity there was to Amber Heard due to the alleged leaking defamatory documents by Johnny's lawyer. Although, the whole thing backfired, since as the graph clearly showed, people were far less interested in bashing Heard, but rather were super interested in supporting Depp. Infact, the witness even said he changed the scale of the graph to try to mitigate the peaks for #justiceforjohnny, otherwise the johnny supporters would drown out all else. The whole segment was an absolute trainwreck, as it was confusing and all it really did was show a sequestered jury how much support there is for Depp on the internet, despite the guy being Heard's expert witness. Although, it was hillarious hearing lawyers repeatedly talk about "Amber turd" in the court room.