Current Events > Journalist wants a porn site for children

(+) Yeah! (+)

Kids wouldn't want to watch the soft stuff anyways. It would be a waste.

---

I dont think I've seen "violent" porn in quite a while. What site is this chick using if not the hub? It's all step nowadays

---

Remember nikki glazers but about gag factor. "I saw a porn last night where thr girl was upside down, he was gagging her, and then he plugged her nose! Nownshe cant breathe at all and im thinking 'am i about to watch this girl die?'"

---

Whether her thought process had good intentions or not, this is NOT something you should post on social media.

---

ShadowElite86 posted...

Whether her thought process had good intentions or not, this is NOT something you should post on social media.

Why?

---

Kids are already watching the hardcore stuff and they won't settle for that boring shit she's describing

I'm pretty liberal on sexual matters, but not that liberal.

I think it's okay to have some sexuality in shows aimed at kids -- stuff like Cinderella and Princess Ariel's teased nudity. (Or that look that Nala gave Simba.)

Wanting to introduce children to sex as a means of introducing them to consent? Yeah, no. I'm gonna have to pass. This isn't a real suggestion anyway; just a passive-aggressive commentary on choking in porn. If some people like being choked, that's their business.

Background_Guy posted...

Kids are already watching the hardcore stuff and they won't settle for that boring shit she's describing

Exactly what I was thinking lol.

If given the choice 10/10 times a kid that wants to watch porn is going to want to watch the interesting shit.

gamer167 posted...

Exactly what I was thinking lol.

If given the choice 10/10 times a kid that wants to watch porn is going to want to watch the interesting shit.

This is an odd thing to feel so sure about.

---

cuttin_in_farm posted...

Why?

Because it's not something that translates well from thought to paper. Pretty obvious considering she had to delete the Tweet....

---

ShadowElite86 posted...

Because it's not something that translates well from thought to paper.

How not? I understand her point pretty clearly.

This very topics title is literally rewording what she said. The twitter replies are claiming child porn.

How does it not translate well just because folks make up things instead of reading?

---

cuttin_in_farm posted...

How not? I understand her point pretty clearly.

This very topics title is literally rewording what she said. The twitter replies are claiming child porn.

How does it not translate well just because folks make up things instead of reading?

i mean clearly her wording was an issue. i googled her name and everything is about this. she had to take her tweets down etc etc.

i agree with her message, though, even if i don't think her solution would work.

---

Imagine being a pornstar filming a porn scene knowing its going to be posted on 4kids pornhub lmao

---

pauIie posted...

i mean clearly her wording was an issue.

Sure, but the other guy said she shouldnt be posting this specifically on social media.

I dont see why this topic should not be said online. Unless he also meant wording.

---

AdrianBeterson posted...

4kids _______ lmao

Cant say that site name here btw. May wanna edit. @AdrianBeterson

---

Sure, cause the existence of such a site would keep kids from the hardcore stuff. Its like thinking giving kids pot will keep them from using herein(sp?).

---

Even ignoring the creepy aspects of her post it was still really dumb thing to say. Softcore vanilla porn already exists. She acts like all porn is BDSM stuff or something.

CyricZ posted...

This is an odd thing to feel so sure about.

Well, believe it or not, I was once a kid who watched porn.

gamer167 posted...

Well, believe it or not, I was once a kid who watched porn.

Sure, but you're a sample size of one.

---

gamer167 posted...

Well, believe it or not, I was once a kid who watched porn.

Do you think access to what shes advocating would have kept you from the hard stuff?

---

Lordgold666 posted...

my children arent using the internet until adulthood, jesus christ these fucking people

Your kids are gonna look up "naked boobies" in the school library on a swedish proxy server like ever other red-blooded american

---

CADE FOSTER posted...

social media was a mistake

It certainly has been a career killer for a lot of people.

---

Ultimately, minors just shouldn't view porn. Yes, they'll view it, anyway, so I understand the need to make sure they'll only view the more socially normal stuff, but society shouldn't actually advocate them to be viewing it at all. Porn sites should just be harder to access and more password-protected.

---

mustachedmystic posted...

Do you think access to what shes advocating would have kept you from the hard stuff?

Depends on what you consider "hard stuff". Even today I have never been into what would be considered by most people to be extreme porn, but I know in high school I sure as hell wasn't searching "happily married couple does missionary on wedding night".

It's not like super boring vanilla porn wasn't available when I was in high school, but when there's more interesting stuff available that's what people are going to watch.

She meant sex education

I just really don't think this solves the problem that she is suggesting exists.

Either you're a teenager who watches pornography and wouldn't care for whatever sanitized version that would exist for this (I believe in teaching more about e.g. consent, but that doesn't mean when I'm watching a video that I need to see them acquire it) or teenagers who don't watch pornography would watch more, which isn't bad but I don't see how it's good either.

The idea of pornography motivated as a teaching tool for people to have sex seems like a weird place to try to instill these values.

---

mustachedmystic posted...

Do you think access to what shes advocating would have kept you from the hard stuff?

For the purposes of this discussion, anything that isn't soft core.

---

When I was a kid I always went for the hard stuff. It's just how I function.

---

Eh, she's got a point, there's no filter at all.

If a 14-15 year old wants to find pron out there, they'll be blasted with every single fetish out there with a single click. Scat, Abuse, etc.

However, these are the kind of things you think, but don't share on social media. She's getting bombarded lmfao.

---

She doesn't really. For one thing, most sites will present the mainstream stuff before anything anyways. All "state-approved" content will do is make kids more desensitized to the tame stuff than they already are and actively search out more risque stuff.

This is coming from someone who ain't a boomer like y'all and actually remembers what it was like to be a teenager not that long ago.

---

PiOverlord posted...

She doesn't really. For one thing, most sites will present the mainstream stuff before anything anyways. All "state-approved" content will do is make kids more desensitized to the tame stuff than they already are and actively search out more risque stuff.

This is coming from someone who ain't a boomer like y'all and actually remembers what it was like to be a teenager not that long ago.

This boomer totally agrees.

---

HagenEx posted...

If a 14-15 year old wants to find pron out there, they'll be blasted with every single fetish out there with a single click. Scat, Abuse, etc.

Unless they are going to H****-R, I doubt it, most stuff is pretty basic vanilla hardcore.

---

I bet Flora Gill is freaking out about this. Her usual tweets only gather a small amount of interest, but her two recent tweets have thousands of comments.

---

Bass_X0 posted...

I bet Flora Gill is freaking out about this. Her usual tweets only gather a small amount of interest, but her two recent tweets have thousands of comments.

Being a "blue checkmark journalist" means that if you say something stupid it will reposted among thousands of twitter outrage-mongers and be blasted across hundreds of clickbait sites, even if you're an unimportant nobody. It's weird how much importance people put into the checkmark.

ROOTFayth posted...

restriction yields far worse results than education

It's also literally impossible since schools these days require internet use for assignments, plus the whole pandemic thing. Although I'm guessing he'll want to homeschool so they "don't get indoctrinated". Luckily, I doubt he'll ever reproduce.

---

No, children's innocence needs to be protected.

---

TerraSeeker posted...

No, children's innocence needs to be protected.

why? they'll inevitable lose their "innocence" anyways, so what's the point is making extreme efforts to prevent them from doing what they choose to do anyways (as opposed to making it safer / more useful to them)

TerraSeeker posted...

No, children's innocence needs to be protected.

Fam_Fam posted...

why? they'll inevitable lose their "innocence" anyways, so what's the point is making extreme efforts to prevent them from doing what they choose to do anyways (as opposed to making it safer / more useful to them)

Well anyone under the age of 12 with a device with internet access needs to be net-nanny locked.

"Childrens" innocence should be protected, however not teenagers (because teens have no innocence lol). Society tends to mash together everyone under age 18 as "children" but the distinction should be made, thats why Miss Flora Gill was crucified on Twitter.

---

If anything, minors should just be taught the dangers of porn addiction and how it can alter your mind. They shouldn't actually look porn, though, because minors looking at it is illegal.

---

deoxxys posted...

Unless they are going to H****-R, I doubt it, most stuff is pretty basic vanilla hardcore.

Nah, most mainstream like XV or XN also have all kinds of crazy stuff. They're rarely featured on the front page though.

---

HagenEx posted...

Nah, most mainstream like XV or XN also have all kinds of crazy stuff. They're rarely featured on the front page though.

exactly, you gotta go looking for it

---

I was literally watching pregnant nun porn as an 11 year old. That being some of the more tame shit I was getting off to.

Never choked a chick until she begged me to.

---

Lordgold666 posted...

my children arent using the internet until adulthood, jesus christ these fucking people

TerraSeeker posted...

No, children's innocence needs to be protected.

You guys really think you'll succeed where every previous generation has failed? You were looking at titties online when you were young, your dads were hiding away skin mags, your grandpas were having Sally from down the street show them her nipples

No love for 17-year-olds I guess

If I were a young kid all I would do to bypass this internet nanny bullshit would be to procure a mobile device my parents aren't aware of, connect it to the wifi and bam.. Wank fest.

---

Bass_X0 posted...

https://mobile.twitter.com/FloraEGill/status/1420753165008334864

yeh I dont want to be held accountable for my shit posts either and Im not even advocating for marketing actual porn to children.

---

Quorthon109 posted...

---