LogFAQs > #956646634

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, Database 8 ( 02.18.2021-09-28-2021 ), DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Journalist wants a porn site for children
deoxxys 07/31/21 3:44:10 PM #141:	TerraSeeker posted... No, children's innocence needs to be protected. Fam_Fam posted... why? they'll inevitable lose their "innocence" anyways, so what's the point is making extreme efforts to prevent them from doing what they choose to do anyways (as opposed to making it safer / more useful to them) Well anyone under the age of 12 with a device with internet access needs to be net-nanny locked. "Childrens" innocence should be protected, however not teenagers (because teens have no innocence lol). Society tends to mash together everyone under age 18 as "children" but the distinction should be made, thats why Miss Flora Gill was crucified on Twitter. --- twylite sprinkle http://tinyurl.com/jeqyas3 https://tinyurl.com/mgvx7h2 <cite>deoxxys posted [p:956646634] in Journalist... [t:79589844]...</cite> <quote>TerraSeeker posted... </cite> <quote>No, children's innocence needs to be protected.</quote> Fam_Fam posted... </cite> <quote>why? they'll inevitable lose their "innocence" anyways, so what's the point is making extreme efforts to prevent them from doing what they choose to do anyways (as opposed to making it safer / more useful to them)</quote>Well anyone under the age of 12 with a device with internet access needs to be net-nanny locked. "Childrens" innocence should be protected, however not teenagers (because teens have no innocence lol). Society tends to mash together everyone under age 18 as "children" but the distinction should be made, thats why Miss Flora Gill was crucified on Twitter. --- twylite sprinkle http://tinyurl.com/jeqyas3 https://tinyurl.com/mgvx7h2</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1