Current Events > Has anyone tried selling Tobacco cigarettes without the carcinogens

Topic List	Page List: 1
ToPoPO 04/16/21 11:34:14 AM #1:	Since Nicotine isn't the main thing that is bad about it <cite>ToPoPO posted [p:952897501] in Has anyone... [t:79408634]...</cite> <quote>Since Nicotine isn't the main thing that is bad about it </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DespondentDeity 04/16/21 11:34:47 AM #2:	Burning plant material is carcinogenic --- The web of destiny carries your blood and soul back to the Genesis of my life form. I never be, I never see, I never know <cite>DespondentDeity posted [p:952897521] in Has anyone... [t:79408634]...</cite> <quote>Burning plant material is carcinogenic </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#3	Post #3 was unavailable or deleted.
Gobstoppers12 04/16/21 11:40:53 AM #4:	DuranOfForcena posted... if this was true in all cases, then there would be evidence that smoking marijuana causes cancer protip: there isn't Think about the quantity, though. Nobody's smoking 20 joints a day. --- I write Naruto Fanfiction. But I am definitely not a furry. <cite>Gobstoppers12 posted [p:952897718] in Has anyone... [t:79408634]...</cite> <quote>DuranOfForcena posted... </cite> <quote>if this was true in all cases, then there would be evidence that smoking marijuana causes cancer protip: there isn't</quote>Think about the quantity, though. Nobody's smoking 20 joints a day. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
WaterLink 04/16/21 11:41:50 AM #5:	Gobstoppers12 posted... Nobody's smoking 20 joints a day. I bet there are --- https://imgur.com/TFF3Nn8 Joe Burrow, the legend <cite>WaterLink posted [p:952897742] in Has anyone... [t:79408634]...</cite> <quote>Gobstoppers12 posted... </cite> <quote>Nobody's smoking 20 joints a day.</quote> I bet there are </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Fade2black001 04/16/21 11:42:59 AM #6:	WaterLink posted... I bet there are Like Snoop? --- Put on a smile cause Jesus loves you <cite>Fade2black001 posted [p:952897788] in Has anyone... [t:79408634]...</cite> <quote>WaterLink posted... </cite> <quote>I bet there are</quote>Like Snoop? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Unsugarized_Foo 04/16/21 11:45:31 AM #7:	Chauvins lawyer had the #1 pulmonologist testify the other day and basically said smoking cigs doesn't affect 90% of people's lungs too terribly 10% get the shaft though --- "All I have is my balls and my word, and I don't break them for anyone!"-Tony Montana <cite>Unsugarized_Foo posted [p:952897897] in Has anyone... [t:79408634]...</cite> <quote>Chauvins lawyer had the #1 pulmonologist testify the other day and basically said smoking cigs doesn't affect 90% of people's lungs too terribly 10% get the shaft though </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Guide 04/16/21 11:50:03 AM #8:	DuranOfForcena posted... if this was true in all cases, then there would be evidence that smoking marijuana causes cancer protip: there isn't Uh there is tho like just a quick google says pot has carcinogens --- evening main 2.4356848e+91 https://youtu.be/Acn5IptKWQU <cite>Guide posted [p:952898044] in Has anyone... [t:79408634]...</cite> <quote>DuranOfForcena posted... </cite> <quote>if this was true in all cases, then there would be evidence that smoking marijuana causes cancer protip: there isn't</quote> Uh there is tho like just a quick google says pot has carcinogens </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Questionmarktarius 04/16/21 11:50:04 AM #9:	Something weird about tobacco causes polonium to stick to the leaves. That's not something that can solved easily. <cite>Questionmarktarius posted [p:952898045] in Has anyone... [t:79408634]...</cite> <quote>Something weird about tobacco causes polonium to stick to the leaves. That's not something that can solved easily. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#10	Post #10 was unavailable or deleted.
Questionmarktarius 04/16/21 12:00:31 PM #11:	DuranOfForcena posted... a quick Google sear h also says that longterm marijuana use has not been demonstrated to be a risk factor for cancer I would guess this is because weed doesn't require fucktons of phosphate fertilizer to grow worth a damn, which is where all that lead and polonium in cigarettes comes from. <cite>Questionmarktarius posted [p:952898315] in Has anyone... [t:79408634]...</cite> <quote>DuranOfForcena posted... </cite> <quote>a quick Google sear h also says that longterm marijuana use has not been demonstrated to be a risk factor for cancer</quote>I would guess this is because weed doesn't require fucktons of phosphate fertilizer to grow worth a damn, which is where all that lead and polonium in cigarettes comes from. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#12	Post #12 was unavailable or deleted.
Questionmarktarius 04/16/21 12:05:26 PM #13:	dantesdmc posted... I have heard they have an awful taste. There's always clove, but that's illegal now for some reason. <cite>Questionmarktarius posted [p:952898458] in Has anyone... [t:79408634]...</cite> <quote>dantesdmc posted... </cite> <quote>I have heard they have an awful taste.</quote>There's always clove, but that's illegal now for some reason. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Damn_Underscore 04/16/21 12:07:17 PM #14:	Cigars? --- I try to laugh about it, hiding the tears in my eyes. <cite>Damn_Underscore posted [p:952898516] in Has anyone... [t:79408634]...</cite> <quote>Cigars? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
bknight 04/16/21 12:30:40 PM #15:	Yea, it's called vaping. <cite>bknight posted [p:952899300] in Has anyone... [t:79408634]...</cite> <quote>Yea, it's called vaping. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
krazychao5 04/16/21 12:32:30 PM #16:	Questionmarktarius posted... There's always clove, but that's illegal now for some reason. thanks, obama --- https://supermariomakerbookmark.nintendo.net/profile/bigllama?type=posted <cite>krazychao5 posted [p:952899366] in Has anyone... [t:79408634]...</cite> <quote>Questionmarktarius posted... </cite> <quote>There's always clove, but that's illegal now for some reason.</quote>thanks, obama </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
WaterLink 04/16/21 12:35:19 PM #17:	Fade2black001 posted... WaterLink posted... I bet there are Like Snoop? That might be short selling him honestly lol --- https://imgur.com/TFF3Nn8 Joe Burrow, the legend <cite>WaterLink posted [p:952899457] in Has anyone... [t:79408634]...</cite> <quote>Fade2black001 posted...</cite> <quote>WaterLink posted... </cite> <quote> I bet there are</quote>Like Snoop? </quote> That might be short selling him honestly lol</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Trumble 04/16/21 4:07:20 PM #18:	Yes, it's called a vape. (Technically they're not 100% free of carcinogens / other nasty stuff, but they contain far, far less than tobacco does.) --- [insert X word here] <cite>Trumble posted [p:952906408] in Has anyone... [t:79408634]...</cite> <quote>Yes, it's called a vape. (Technically they're not 100% free of carcinogens / other nasty stuff, but they contain far, far less than tobacco does.) </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Perascamin 04/16/21 4:10:46 PM #19:	DuranOfForcena posted... if this was true in all cases, then there would be evidence that smoking marijuana causes cancer protip: there isn't You can't inhale smoke long term and it not cause health issues --- I've grown. <cite>Perascamin posted [p:952906507] in Has anyone... [t:79408634]...</cite> <quote>DuranOfForcena posted... </cite> <quote>if this was true in all cases, then there would be evidence that smoking marijuana causes cancer protip: there isn't</quote>You can't inhale smoke long term and it not cause health issues </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Trumble 04/16/21 4:11:35 PM #20:	Perascamin posted... You can't inhale smoke long term and it not cause health issues Some pro-cannabis people have this delusional idea that cannabis is 100% harmless, for some reason. ~~And I say this as someone who is pro-cannabis myself. You don't have to be anti- something to admit the downsides to it exist.~~ --- [insert X word here] <cite>Trumble posted [p:952906532] in Has anyone... [t:79408634]...</cite> <quote>Perascamin posted... </cite> <quote>You can't inhale smoke long term and it not cause health issues</quote>Some pro-cannabis people have this delusional idea that cannabis is 100% harmless, for some reason. And I say this as someone who is pro-cannabis myself. You don't have to be anti- something to admit the downsides to it exist. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Questionmarktarius 04/16/21 4:15:28 PM #21:	Trumble posted... Some pro-cannabis people have this delusional idea that cannabis is 100% harmless, for some reason. Inhaling THC gummibears seems kinda dumb... <cite>Questionmarktarius posted [p:952906635] in Has anyone... [t:79408634]...</cite> <quote>Trumble posted... </cite> <quote>Some pro-cannabis people have this delusional idea that cannabis is 100% harmless, for some reason.</quote>Inhaling THC gummibears seems kinda dumb... </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#22	Post #22 was unavailable or deleted.
Axiom 04/16/21 4:17:36 PM #23:	Questionmarktarius posted... Inhaling THC gummibears seems kinda dumb... Lmao <cite>Axiom posted [p:952906691] in Has anyone... [t:79408634]...</cite> <quote>Questionmarktarius posted... </cite> <quote>Inhaling THC gummibears seems kinda dumb...</quote>Lmao </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Trumble 04/16/21 4:17:37 PM #24:	Questionmarktarius posted... Inhaling THC gummibears seems kinda dumb... Edibles are not 100% harmless either. Though they're certianly less harmful than smoking. There is no way to consume it that's 100% harmless. Nor does there need to be in order to justify legalization - there's plenty of shit that has some risk that's 100% legal, no reason cannabis can't join that list. It's low-risk, and in particular poses fuck all risk to people other than the users; that's good enough. Being in denial about this only gives the anti-cannabis side ammo to say "look at those ignorant dumb stoners", as well as discourages research that could better understand the harms and possibly even find ways to reduce the risk while still enjoying the high and/or medicinal benefits. --- [insert X word here] <cite>Trumble posted [p:952906692] in Has anyone... [t:79408634]...</cite> <quote>Questionmarktarius posted... </cite> <quote>Inhaling THC gummibears seems kinda dumb...</quote>Edibles are not 100% harmless either. Though they're certianly less harmful than smoking. There is no way to consume it that's 100% harmless. Nor does there need to be in order to justify legalization - there's plenty of shit that has some risk that's 100% legal, no reason cannabis can't join that list. It's low-risk, and in particular poses fuck all risk to people other than the users; that's good enough. Being in denial about this only gives the anti-cannabis side ammo to say "look at those ignorant dumb stoners", as well as discourages research that could better understand the harms and possibly even find ways to reduce the risk while still enjoying the high and/or medicinal benefits. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
thronedfire2 04/16/21 4:30:00 PM #25:	people getting cancer from weed are probably the ones who only roll with cigarillos --- I could see you, but I couldn't hear you You were holding your hat in the breeze Turning away from me In this moment you were stolen... <cite>thronedfire2 posted [p:952907038] in Has anyone... [t:79408634]...</cite> <quote>people getting cancer from weed are probably the ones who only roll with cigarillos </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dunsworthy 04/16/21 4:32:42 PM #26:	Breathing any type of smoke into your lungs is not good for them. Anyone who thinks otherwise is in denial. <cite>Dunsworthy posted [p:952907109] in Has anyone... [t:79408634]...</cite> <quote>Breathing any type of smoke into your lungs is not good for them. Anyone who thinks otherwise is in denial. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#27	Post #27 was unavailable or deleted.
#28	Post #28 was unavailable or deleted.
Topic List	Page List: 1

Current Events > Has anyone tried selling Tobacco cigarettes without the carcinogens (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Has anyone tried selling Tobacco cigarettes without the carcinogens