Current Events > Jordan Peterson finds out he is the new villain in the Captain America comics.

(+) Yeah! (+)

sevihaimerej posted...

they're mostly just entertaining fluff with no clear political slant. So what, he doesn't like the infinite gender "biological sex isn't real" types, most people don't at this moment in history don't agree with those ideas either and that's okay, these things take time and all these new ideas are in such a primitive state the majority of the information justifying it is nearly incommunicable to the average person since the language chosen for a lot of these theories is intentionally provocative

The language is from the 70s and the modern trans rights movement started in '59. The problem largely isn't getting caught up on language, but recognizing trans people as people.

---

Delirious_Beard posted...

Peterson may not be a nazi, but he's one of those incredibly dishonest figures who will dress up fascist rhetoric (his obsession with tradition and hierarchy, "cultural marxism" aka nazi conspiracies), be openly white nationalist adjacent and then when you make the final obvious connection to fascism he suddenly cries about how you're putting words in his mouth and his fans tell you that you're misrepresenting his positions because you haven't watched every single lecture he's ever done

Cultural marxists are just a buzzword for critical theorists, which is from what I've gathered what he criticizes. He specifically critics critical theory quite a lot, which surprise, a lot of critical theorists hate his guts.

Not sure what openly white nationalist adjacent is.

RustyFerret posted...

Cultural marxists are just a buzzword for critical theorists

Sometimes it means jews and the deep state.

joe40001 posted...

They won't look, they'll watch the one where they edit down his words to completely change his meaning and take that as gospel.

in the full context video he still says the exact same thing wtf are you on about?

---

This is really dumb

---

RustyFerret posted...

Not sure what openly white nationalist adjacent is.

he was buddying around with the likes of Lauren Southern and Stefan Molyneux a few years ago

---

Smackems posted...

This is really dumb

No, it's a genius way to make a modern red skull.

Delirious_Beard posted...

he was buddying around with the likes of Lauren Southern and Stefan Molyneux a few years ago

I've heard of lauren southern. Never heard of that stefan guy.

Didn't he also pal around with Russel Brand, Stephen Fry, Bill Maher and Dr Oz?

How many paid Peterson shills is this, three?
---

ButteryMales posted...

No, it's a genius way to make a modern red skull.

Lol if you say so

---

FrisbeeDude posted...

Imagine how much of a chud one has to be to refer to Ta-Nahesi Coates as a "Piss poor writer"

LMFAO

You obviously haven't seen the garbage comics he's written.

---

Jesus Christ I forgot joe numbers is a JBP shill as well.

Incredible how one dude can just be so consistently awful.
---

I don't know if it's JP exactly but that is pretty atrocious writing in both of those shots

Rapid99 posted...

Looks like it's about time to post my favorite JP images again

My favourite thing about this image is that I went to the Jordan Peterson subreddit and found it, and I read through the comments. These goobers were trying to interpret it in the same manner that Nicolas Cage interprets every random symbol in National Treasure. It was precious

---

JP is a stupid man with zero discipline and insight, and if his advice has helped you then your problems were likely all in your head and you were just looking for someone to grovel to. This is hilarious, do Joe Rogan next

---

Hipparmchia posted...

if his advice has helped you then your problems were likely all in your head and you were just looking for someone to grovel to

i don't think i agree
it's not like the guy has never given good advice >_>

---

His good advice is usually just to clean your room. Something you could literally just call your mother to get.

---

BLAKUboy posted...

His good advice is usually just to clean your room. Something you could literally just call your mother to get.

Oh wow! Red Skull says that too!!

WingsOfGood posted...

Oh wow! Red Skull says that too!!

lmao

---

Several easy tags up in this thread.

---

reminder that Jordan Peterson initially became famous for spreading false information about a bill to make gender identity a protected class in Canada.
https://www.parl.ca/DocumentViewer/en/42-1/bill/c-16/first-reading

---

Choco posted...

i don't think i agree
it's not like the guy has never given good advice >_>

yeah i think there's people he's helped in a positive way. there's not any need to downplay those cases.

however i think he's absolutely a net-negative in terms of how much harm and toxicity he's brought to the table

---

kirbyakaZ posted...

I feel like I'm missing something

We all do

BLAKUboy posted...

His good advice is usually just to clean your room. Something you could literally just call your mother to get.

His advice is aimed at immature social science majors and alt right morons who would rather point out how the world is the problem instead of themselves.

RustyFerret posted...

His advice is aimed at immature social science majors and alt right morons who would rather point out how the world is the problem instead of themselves.

Okay but the problem is actually the world and not a Social science major's dirty room.

---

Tyranthraxus posted...

Okay but the problem is actually the world and not a Social science major's dirty room.

The problem is people who don't have their shit together trying to dictate how to fix the world, so they just end up adding to how shitty the world is instead.

RustyFerret posted...

The problem is people who don't have their shit together trying to dictate how to fix the world, so they just end up adding to how shitty the world is instead.

Yes I agree Jordan Peterson is the problem.

---

Tyranthraxus posted...

Yes I agree Jordan Peterson is the problem.

Same with the people bitching about him all the time.

I really dont follow JP but its hilarious to me the lengths and the mental gymnastics I end up seeing from the people that hate him.

Pick better demons. Jesus Christ.

---

SwayM posted...

I really dont follow JP but its hilarious to me the lengths and the mental gymnastics I end up seeing from the people that hate him.

Pick better demons. Jesus Christ.

hey man just want to say thanks for giving me confirmation that i'm on the right side of things whenever you post

---

Delirious_Beard posted...

hey man just want to say thanks for giving me confirmation that i'm on the right side of things whenever you post

This is a two way street and your tag is telling. No surprises here.

---

SwayM posted...

I really dont follow JP but its hilarious to me the lengths and the mental gymnastics I end up seeing from the people that hate him.

Pick better demons. Jesus Christ.

He literally tried to block rights for people based on their gender identity, then said he'd rail against gay marriage because people he disagrees with support it.

---

Blue_Dream87 posted...

He literally tried to block rights for people based on their gender identity, then said he'd rail against gay marriage because people he disagrees with support it.

Im sure thats exactly what happened.

---

SwayM posted...

Im sure thats exactly what happened.

These are pretty well-known criticisms of him when he started getting popular.

---

So dont know anything about him dont care. But sounds like hes a theorist/philosopher/self-hell guru/life coach Kinda guy who generally preaches things in line with an alt right/racist belief, so while he hardly ever says anything alt right racist, almost everyone around him has ?

is that kinda accurate

---

Here's the gay marriage quote as per Google

Question:
Australia is holding a plebiscite on whether to legalize gay marriage. Im against the yes campaign, but only because its backed by cultural Marxists. Im curious to hear your views on gay marriage.
Jordans Response:
Well, I would be against it too if it was backed by cultural Marxists because it isnt clear to me that it will satisfy the ever increasing What would you call it? Demand for an assault or traditional modes of being. Now with regards to being married specifically, thats a really tough one for me because I can imagine I cant do anything really other than spout platitudes about what I suppose, unfortunately.
If the marital vows are taken seriously, then it seems to me that its a means whereby gay people can be integrated more thoroughly into standard society. Thats probably a good thing. Maybe that would decrease promiscuity, which is a public health problem, although obviously thats not limited to gay people. Although gay men tend to be more promiscuous than average, probably because theres no women to bind them with regards to their sexual activity. The problem is that it does seem to me to be part of a wedge. It isnt obvious to me that legalizing gay marriage has done anything to decrease the demands that the racial left, neo Marxist types are placing on traditional society.
Those are my views. I know theyre confused because Im in favor of extending the bounds of traditional relationships to people who wouldnt be involved in a traditional long-term relationship but Im concerned about the undermining of traditional modes of being, including marriage, which has technically Historically between a man and a woman, fundamentally, for the purpose of raising children in a stable An optimal and stable environment. Marriage has already taken a fair bit of damage over the last few decades. Poor people are increasingly less likely to be married, and thats really not good for them as far as Im concerned.

I'm not really sure why his response to such a ridiculous question is so long-winded.

The plebiscite was from a pro-corporation millionaire Prime Minister.

---

gamepimp12 posted...

So dont know anything about him dont care. But sounds like hes a theorist/philosopher/self-hell guru/life coach Kinda guy who generally preaches things in line with an alt right/racist belief, so while he hardly ever says anything alt right racist, almost everyone around him has ?

is that kinda accurate

He started his career on being anti-feminist and went to the logical conclusion from there.

---

Tyranthraxus posted...

He started his career on being anti-feminist and went to the logical conclusion from there.

So rah rah rah Men need to be like their grandfather where rah rah those men where strong and their women knew their role because of it rah rah rah

---

Darmik posted...

Well, I would be against it too if it was backed by cultural Marxists because

So does anyone know the origin of that phrase? It was coined by a certain European political party back in the 30s where they called it Kulturbolschewismus in the original language.



---

Thats hilarious.

---

Oh right. I forgot the "I would deny gay people their rights if cultural marxists thought giving it to them was a good idea" quote.

---

gamepimp12 posted...

self-hell guru

When you accidentally get it exactly right.

---

Darmik posted...

Here's the gay marriage quote as per Google

I'm not really sure why his response to such a ridiculous question is so long-winded.

The plebiscite was from a pro-corporation millionaire Prime Minister.

Its because JP needs to make as long winded and nonsensical an answer as possible so when someone calls him out on a **** take, he can pretend he was misunderstood.

Or to distract from his horrible answer of "no, because the left likes it"

Now he's trying to make bad red skull memes. Guess he isn't self aware enough.
---

SwayM posted...

Im sure thats exactly what happened.

he literally became famous for fear-mongering about a transgender protection bill

---

averagejoel posted...

he literally became famous for fear-mongering about a transgender protection bill

Wasn't a canadian father recently jailed for misgendering his daughter recently?

RustyFerret posted...

Wasn't a canadian father recently jailed for misgendering his daughter recently?

I've certainly never heard of it happening. but also the bill that he was fear-mongering about doesn't even mention misgendering

---

averagejoel posted...

I've certainly never heard of it happening. but also the bill that he was fear-mongering about doesn't even mention misgendering

It's Robert Hoogland and the bill contained protections for gender expression, didn't it?