Current Events > Are Zack Snyder fanboys the biggest simps when it comes to movies?

(+) Yeah! (+)

I've never seen a bad-mediocre director be this overpraised except for maybe George Lucas for the prequels after The Last Jedi didn't pander to the entitled manbabies.

Christopher Nolan fanboys are up there.
---

EllieWilliams95 posted...

for maybe George Lucas after The Last Jedi?

Um....

Wanna try that one again, friend?

---

JKwaffle posted...

Um....

Wanna try that one again, friend?

It seems fine to me.

Smashingpmkns posted...

Christopher Nolan fanboys are up there.

I mean for good reason tho

Can't say the same for a mediocre to terrible director like Snyder

---

JKwaffle posted...

Um....

Wanna try that one again, friend?

i think he's saying how people pretend george lucas isn't hack and the prequels aren't completely shit these day because of how bad the sequels were

You're probably trolling, but on the chance you're not.

Lucas didn't direct any of the sequel trilogy.

Rian Johnson directed The Last Jedi.

---

JKwaffle posted...

Um....

Wanna try that one again, friend?

Come on man, he's trying.

---

JKwaffle posted...

You're probably trolling, but on the chance you're not.

Lucas didn't direct any of the sequel trilogy.

Rian Johnson directed The Last Jedi.

I was talking about how the "fans" suddenly thought the awful prequels were somehow good now but of how triggered they were by Last Jedi not pandering to them.

Reis posted...

i think he's saying how people pretend george lucas isn't hack and the prequels aren't completely shit these day because of how bad the sequels were

Oh, if that's what they're saying then sure. Lucas did awful with the prequels.

I thought they were trying to say Lucas directed the sequel trilogy, which is just like... what.

---

EllieWilliams95 posted...

I was talking about how the "fans" suddenly thought the awful prequels were somehow good now but of how triggered they were by Last Jedi not pandering to them.

Gotcha.

I vastly misunderstood your point, I'm sorry.

I'm a few drinks in tonight lmao.

---

EllieWilliams95 posted...

I was talking about how the "fans" suddenly thought the awful prequels were somehow good now but of how triggered they were by Last Jedi not pandering to them.

I for one don't associate pandas with George Lucas

---

JKwaffle posted...

Oh, if that's what they're saying then sure. Lucas did awful with the prequels.

I thought they were trying to say Lucas directed the sequel trilogy, which is just like... what.

Waffle! You're alive! I never see you around here anymore.

Also, I disagree about Lucas being a bad director because of the prequels-- the movies looked good. They proved that he was a shitty writer.

And Snyder's fans are definitely the worst for this, but I'd argue that Abrams is also pretty bad and yet people still like him for some damn reason.

His Star Trek movies were awful and filled with so much lens flare that you'd need sunglasses to not get a headache from them. Then, he butchered Star Wars too with a lame rehash of stuff from the original trilogy, "and then Palpatine returned, somehow" to finish off the trilogy with just a ton of ridiculous garbage.

pfh1001 posted...

Waffle! You're alive! I never see you around here anymore.

Also, I disagree about Lucas being a bad director because of the prequels-- the movies looked good. They proved that he was a shitty writer.

And Snyder's fans are definitely the worst for this, but I'd argue that Abrams is also pretty bad and yet people still like him for some damn reason.

His Star Trek movies were awful and filled with so much lens flare that you'd need sunglasses to not get a headache from them. Then, he butchered Star Wars too with a lame rehash of stuff from the original trilogy, "and then Palpatine returned, somehow" to finish off the trilogy with just a ton of ridiculous garbage.

Lucas was a bad director, the acting was either wooden or terrible for the most part and that was Lucas's fault. Also the focus on almost everything being cgi. And lol at J.J Abrams being a bad director, the Star Trek reboot and Force Awakens was widely praised by critics and audiences (except for entitled nerds), unfortunately he did fuck up with Rise of Skywalker but almost all directors (even the greatest ones) have bad movies in their track record.

pfh1001 posted...

Waffle! You're alive! I never see you around here anymore.

Also, I disagree about Lucas being a bad director because of the prequels-- the movies looked good. They proved that he was a shitty writer.

And Snyder's fans are definitely the worst for this, but I'd argue that Abrams is also pretty bad and yet people still like him for some damn reason.

His Star Trek movies were awful and filled with so much lens flare that you'd need sunglasses to not get a headache from them. Then, he butchered Star Wars too with a lame rehash of stuff from the original trilogy, "and then Palpatine returned, somehow" to finish off the trilogy with just a ton of ridiculous garbage.

Yeah, I kinda needed a break from CE, took some time to get caught up on some real life shit.

Lucas is just such a hit or miss artist, that it's honestly really hard to say what his strong suits are and aren't.

I can agree with the Abrams sentiment though, I don't understand the love for him, he's a passable director at best.

---

EllieWilliams95 posted...

And lol at J.J Abrams being a bad director, the Star Trek reboot and Force Awakens was widely praised by critics and audiences (except for entitled nerds), unfortunately he did fuck up with Rise of Skywalker but almost all directors (even the greatest ones) have bad movies in their track record.

The Star Trek reboot was only good for some interesting casting choices. The lens flare was so overwhelming that it turned into a meme and otherwise it was generic as fuck. Into Darkness was absolutely terrible-- it couldn't decide if it wanted to be an actual Khan remake or just throw in a bunch of lame pandering 'references' that didn't even make sense in the fucking movie.

Specifically, the stupid over dramatic reveal of his real name-- meant for the fans to go "OMG!" only Kirk responds, "Who?" because the backstory is completely removed and they've never met before.

Force Awakens was over praised for being 'new Star Wars' only with 500% more of a throwback feel. If that's all you want, then bully for you.

My niece was thrilled that there was a third fucking Death Star-- but she was only 7 years old, and I was bored to tears with that crap.

JKwaffle posted...

Yeah, I kinda needed a break from CE, took some time to get caught up on some real life shit.

Glad to hear you're doing alright.

pfh1001 posted...

The Star Trek reboot was only good for some interesting casting choices. The lens flare was so overwhelming that it turned into a meme and otherwise it was generic as fuck. Into Darkness was absolutely terrible-- it couldn't decide if it wanted to be an actual Khan remake or just throw in a bunch of lame pandering 'references' that didn't even make sense in the fucking movie.

Specifically, the stupid over dramatic reveal of his real name-- meant for the fans to go "OMG!" only Kirk responds, "Who?" because the backstory is completely removed and they've never met before.

Force Awakens was over praised for being 'new Star Wars' only with 500% more of a throwback feel. If that's all you want, then bully for you.

My niece was thrilled that there was a third fucking Death Star-- but she was only 7 years old, and I was bored to tears with that crap.

Glad to hear you're doing alright.

Ok thanks for your opinion. Star Trek (2009), Star Trek Into Darkness, and Star Wars Force Awakens was widely praised by critics and audiences.