Poll of the Day > The Media said Al Gore was president for over a month after Elections

(+) Yeah! (+)

adjl posted...

I'm just going to keep reposting this until one of you people can actually come up with an answer to it:
adjl posted...

why do you assume we believe that? seriously like 70% of arguing with leftists is trying to clear up their constant self imposed misconceptions =.=

all i'm saying is that there is going to be a recount and serious investigations, i'm not saying anything will flip because i don't know what would happen, i'm just saying that people should wait for the eggs to hatch before counting chicks

---

you don't need to wait for eggs to hatch to count chicks.

you can literally just hold the egg up to a light and see if it's developing properly

---

2016: Trump wins the election.
Republicans: Democrats think there was interference in the election and want to investigate?! Lol no. Trump is our president now.

2020: Biden wins the election.
Republicans: There is clear interference with this election that should be investigated! Biden isn't our president yet!

But seriously, didn't Republicans recently storm polling locations telling certain places to stop counting while telling others to keep counting? Isn't that interfering with an election?

Wanded posted...

why do you assume we believe that? seriously like 70% of arguing with leftists is trying to clear up their constant self imposed misconceptions =.=

all i'm saying is that there is going to be a recount and serious investigations, i'm not saying anything will flip because i don't know what would happen, i'm just saying that people should wait for the eggs to hatch before counting chicks

If you don't believe that any states have a non-zero chance of flipping in Trump's favour, then you don't believe that the election has a non-zero chance of flipping in Trump's favour. This is not the sort of topic that somebody who believed there was no chance of the election flipping in Trump's favour would make. Ergo, you must believe that some states have a non-zero chance of flipping.

I'm not asking for you to identify states that are extremely likely/guaranteed to flip. Just the ones that you believe have a possibility of doing so and your reasons for believing that. That shouldn't be a difficult question to answer if you actually have a basis for the position that the media is being premature to predict a Biden win.

---

adjl posted...

Ah yes, forgot about him. He probably wouldn't welch either, though I believe his intent is to create a new account after following through on it (which he almost certainly won't have to do).

That's true. He did say he wanted a new username. So, I'm almost 100% positive he would have created a new one...
---

likehelly posted...

you don't need to wait for eggs to hatch to count chicks.

you can literally just hold the egg up to a light and see if it's developing properly

you're 100% correct, we need to put the election under the light of recounts and investigations.

man101 posted...

Comparing an election where one state was all that was left to determine the winner and it came down to only 500 votes with an election where the loser would need to flip at least four states all of which he's trailing by at least 5 figures. Totally the same thing, definitely not grasping at every last pathetic attempt to stall having to admit defeat.

First of all i wouldn't necessarily call the election a defeat for republicans if biden gets inaugurated as republicans kept a majority in the house and gained seats in the house, biden is the first president to enter office in like 40 years with the senate belonging to the other party and with a big percentage of the country not believing he really won.

him winning would be a victory, but not a victory one would be proud of, which is all the more reason democrat biden supporters such as yourself and the others in here should desire thorough recounts and thorough investigations of all the litigations trump issues, if everything goes through and biden still reigns supreme, then you and biden can truly be proud and deniers would have no leg to stand on, being against the recounts and investigations on the other hand....now that would be highly sus.

second, no one claimed it was the exact same thing.

adjl posted...

If you don't believe that any states have a non-zero chance of flipping in Trump's favour, then you don't believe that the election has a non-zero chance of flipping in Trump's favour. This is not the sort of topic that somebody who believed there was no chance of the election flipping in Trump's favour would make. Ergo, you must believe that some states have a non-zero chance of flipping.

I'm not asking for you to identify states that are extremely likely/guaranteed to flip. Just the ones that you believe have a possibility of doing so and your reasons for believing that. That shouldn't be a difficult question to answer if you actually have a basis for the position that the media is being premature to predict a Biden win.

the answer to your question relies on trumps litigations, we still don't know the content or scope of what is being brought to court, the answer to your question would reveal itself once we wait and see what trump bring to the table.

---

we just gotta trust in Daddy Trump, boys!

Xfma100 posted...

2016: Trump wins the election.
Republicans: Democrats think there was interference in the election and want to investigate?! Lol no. Trump is our president now.

2020: Biden wins the election.
Republicans: There is clear interference with this election that should be investigated! Biden isn't our president yet!

But seriously, didn't Republicans recently storm polling locations telling certain places to stop counting while telling others to keep counting? Isn't that interfering with an election?

you missed 3 years of tax payer funded russiagate investigation that amounted to nothing at all.
republicans wanted the voting to stop in places where they broke the law and didn't let poll watchers do their job

---

JigsawTDC posted...

we just gotta trust in Daddy Trump, boys!

why?

---

Wanded posted...

why?

We just gotta wait and see what he brings to the table!

Wanded posted...

you missed 3 years of tax payer funded russiagate investigation that amounted to nothing at all.
republicans wanted the voting to stop in places where they broke the law and didn't let poll watchers do their job

"Amounted to nothing at all?" Seriously, that's how your brain works? How about they determined 100% that russia did interfere with the election and that Trump knew about it and even made attempts to work with Russia but they were specifically unable to charge him with a conspiracy because he was either extremely lucky with his wording or people around him outright refused to follow his instructions. The man knew about the interference and his intentions are crystal clear. He got off on a technicality of how quid pro quo works in a legal context.

But sure, go ahead and interpret that as "nothing at all" and act like the 2016 election is in any way comparable to one poll watcher complaining that he wasn't able to see the ballot counting at one point, because that somehow explains a 5 million vote deficit.

---

Wanded posted...

the answer to your question relies on trumps litigations, we still don't know the content or scope of what is being brought to court, the answer to your question would reveal itself once we wait and see what trump bring to the table.

So you believe that there is a non-zero chance of the election flipping purely because Trump has filed lawsuits that might have something worthwhile in them. Not because you know what's in any of those suits and believe them to be credible, not because you've seen anything that might suggest he has a legitimate case, and never mind that every such suit has already been thrown out for being baseless and frivolous and he just keeps throwing out new ones in hopes that something sticks. But purely because he has filed lawsuits that might not be nonsense.

That's called blind faith, and it's a really stupid thing to base any sort of belief on. Even more so when it's painfully obvious to literally everyone that the man you're placing your blind faith in is desperately unravelling because he's too narcissistic to ever consider that he might have lost legitimately. Even more so when the man you're placing your blind faith in has demonstrated himself to be a self-interested pathological liar every time he's opened his mouth for the last four years. Even more so when the man you're placing your faith in still insists - without any sort of evidence - that the last election (which he won) was similarly rigged against him because he didn't win by as much as his ego thinks he ought to have.

Trump is not a man anyone should be placing any blind faith in. There is no reason to believe that the outcome of this election will change. In fact, at this point, if the outcome does change, everyone should be very skeptical about what fraud Trump has committed to make that happen, because it does not currently look like that should be possible. New evidence may surface that will change that reality, but unless that happens, you should expect Biden to be taking office in January. Any other expectation is just setting yourself up for disappointment.

---

Why does it have to be fraud against trump if its the other way around shouldnt people be skeptical about Biden

---

adjl posted...

Even more so when the man you're placing your faith in still insists - without any sort of evidence - that the last election (which he won) was similarly rigged against him because he didn't win by as much as his ego thinks he ought to have.

Ding ding ding. This is the major point. Even when he wins he still doesn't win **enough** and has to bitch about something. Yet somehow loads of people believe him when he legitimately loses while sitting center stage and won't accept it, as if that is anything other than totally in character for him.

---

likehelly posted...

you confused biden for something trump did again

lolwut? I know you don't pay any attention to politics -- which is why you have the views you do -- but Biden has repeatedly gone on record with plans to stack SCOTUS, whereas Trump never once suggested expanding the court.

likehelly posted...

none of this happened

Literally all of this happened.

GanonsSpirit posted...

You're forgetting one of the bets, guys:

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/3-poll-of-the-day/79082864/946666551

Wanded certainly won't welch after literally begging people to make a bet with him, right?

If it regards a bet nobody took, how could it be considered welching? If you bet somebody $50 on the outcome of a game and the other guy didn't accept, would you pay him $50 anyway?

---

man101 posted...

"Amounted to nothing at all?" Seriously, that's how your brain works? How about they determined 100% that russia did interfere with the election and that Trump knew about it and even made attempts to work with Russia but they were specifically unable to charge him with a conspiracy because he was either extremely lucky with his wording or people around him outright refused to follow his instructions. The man knew about the interference and his intentions are crystal clear. He got off on a technicality of how quid pro quo works in a legal context.

But sure, go ahead and interpret that as "nothing at all" and act like the 2016 election is in any way comparable to one poll watcher complaining that he wasn't able to see the ballot counting at one point, because that somehow explains a 5 million vote deficit.

More of Man101's trolling and false claims.

---

---