Poll of the Day > Will the USA have a Civil War Soon?

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3
LinkPizza 11/02/20 5:46:39 AM #53:	YoukaiSlayer posted... Firstly, the navy exists and theres no way it's spreading to thier ships before people figure it out. Depends. I think on the Walking Dead (at least the video game, havent checked show lore), if you die, you turn. So, it can easily reach on a ship. And probably spread pretty easily if they dont know early enough... YoukaiSlayer posted... Secondly, news of people biting and infection others would spread instantly even if we pretend the concept of zombies doesn't exist. You think? I disagree. The people who are first to know are probably already bitten by loves ones like friends, family, Neighbors, co-workers, etc. And who knows of the news anchors or radio announcers even make it to work. Or know about it right when it happens. Especially if you dont know whats going on. Theres also probably plenty of people gone already. Also, depends on if they are walking or the running kind. The running kind would definitely spread faster... YoukaiSlayer posted... And finally, how would zombies ever beat a tank? Like 1 tank could take out thousands of zombies and still be fine. They cant. But not all military equipment are just loaded constantly. I know for the aircraft on base, the only time they carry weapons is before a mission. On regular fly days, nothing is install. Same with out cargo planes. Empty unless a mission. Most military vehicles are probably like that. Its a safety hazard if just left like that. So, they may not be able to beat a tank. But the tanks most likely arent ready. And they still have to be reloaded at some point. And thats if there are people one base who can still use it. Not everyone in the military is trained on the same thing. Its really a dice roll... YoukaiSlayer posted... All of that is only if somehow the zombies start out in all the military bases at the same time. Realistically you'd have a pretty localized spread that takes days to go across the country and thats more than enough time for the military to figure out enough about zombies to take them all out. It could, though. As I said, with the walking dead types, it was just dead people without the head damage a certain way would come back. And people all over the world are dying all the time. So, it could start off in many places at once. As for how much time, it depends on whos left and where they are. If it were possible that we had the people who know how to use the weaponry, we probably could take out some of them, and millions of innocents around, as well... Bug whats the point of saving everyone if theyre dying by our hand, anyway... Really, it depends on what kind of zombies, where it starts, how long before the news can actually spread, and whos left to fight... Edit: Oh. And probably when it happens, as well. As Halloween, it would be hard to tell, as well... Edit 2: Time is probably important as well. Happening in the middle of the night while people are asleep, not fully awake, and cant see as well might help to spread faster. Happening during the day could possibly slow stuff down... But it just depends... --- Official King of Kings Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around. <cite>LinkPizza posted [p:946606968] in Will the U... [t:79073335]...</cite> <quote>YoukaiSlayer posted...</cite> <quote>Firstly, the navy exists and theres no way it's spreading to thier ships before people figure it out.</quote> Depends. I think on the Walking Dead (at least the video game, havent checked show lore), if you die, you turn. So, it can easily reach on a ship. And probably spread pretty easily if they dont know early enough... YoukaiSlayer posted...</cite> <quote>Secondly, news of people biting and infection others would spread instantly even if we pretend the concept of zombies doesn't exist. </quote> You think? I disagree. The people who are first to know are probably already bitten by loves ones like friends, family, Neighbors, co-workers, etc. And who knows of the news anchors or radio announcers even make it to work. Or know about it right when it happens. Especially if you dont know whats going on. Theres also probably plenty of people gone already. Also, depends on if they are walking or the running kind. The running kind would definitely spread faster... YoukaiSlayer posted...</cite> <quote>And finally, how would zombies ever beat a tank? Like 1 tank could take out thousands of zombies and still be fine.</quote> They cant. But not all military equipment are just loaded constantly. I know for the aircraft on base, the only time they carry weapons is before a mission. On regular fly days, nothing is install. Same with out cargo planes. Empty unless a mission. Most military vehicles are probably like that. Its a safety hazard if just left like that. So, they may not be able to beat a tank. But the tanks most likely arent ready. And they still have to be reloaded at some point. And thats if there are people one base who can still use it. Not everyone in the military is trained on the same thing. Its really a dice roll... YoukaiSlayer posted...</cite> <quote>All of that is only if somehow the zombies start out in all the military bases at the same time. Realistically you'd have a pretty localized spread that takes days to go across the country and thats more than enough time for the military to figure out enough about zombies to take them all out. </quote> It could, though. As I said, with the walking dead types, it was just dead people without the head damage a certain way would come back. And people all over the world are dying all the time. So, it could start off in many places at once. As for how much time, it depends on whos left and where they are. If it were possible that we had the people who know how to use the weaponry, we probably could take out some of them, and millions of innocents around, as well... Bug whats the point of saving everyone if theyre dying by our hand, anyway... Really, it depends on what kind of zombies, where it starts, how long before the news can actually spread, and whos left to fight... Edit: Oh. And probably when it happens, as well. As Halloween, it would be hard to tell, as well... Edit 2: Time is probably important as well. Happening in the middle of the night while people are asleep, not fully awake, and cant see as well might help to spread faster. Happening during the day could possibly slow stuff down... But it just depends...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Unbridled9 11/02/20 7:00:48 AM #54:	The only way to win a civil war is through armed conflict. Whichever side tries will be defeated swiftly. I feel certain both sides understand this. We're already seeing a cultural civil war. If the left wins we'll see the Truth and Reconciliation commission show up (they've already talked about this) and the right will have militias form determined to stand against that. If the left loses we'll see rioting and ANTIFA/BLM get violent. Either way the moment they attempt to stand against the military they'll lose, but neither will attempt an 'armed conflict' to try and usurp the president no matter how bad the situation. The one thing that would guarantee their loss would be attempting that. --- I am the gentle hand who heals, the happy smile who shields, and the foot that will kick your ***! - White Mage <cite>Unbridled9 posted [p:946607945] in Will the U... [t:79073335]...</cite> <quote>The only way to win a civil war is through armed conflict. Whichever side tries will be defeated swiftly. I feel certain both sides understand this. We're already seeing a cultural civil war. If the left wins we'll see the Truth and Reconciliation commission show up (they've already talked about this) and the right will have militias form determined to stand against that. If the left loses we'll see rioting and ANTIFA/BLM get violent. Either way the moment they attempt to stand against the military they'll lose, but neither will attempt an 'armed conflict' to try and usurp the president no matter how bad the situation. The one thing that would guarantee their loss would be attempting that. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Unbridled9 11/02/20 7:29:48 AM #55:	I can think of a single situation in which the right attempts armed insurrection. It would be a situation in which Trump wins both the popular and electoral college (especially if by a landslide) but the electors defect and vote Biden. That is the only situation where I can see the right being willing to engage in a civil war because it means that, even if they win, they lose. At that point they may as well go for it. Let's face it; if that situation happened a lot of people would support the right as well. --- I am the gentle hand who heals, the happy smile who shields, and the foot that will kick your ***! - White Mage <cite>Unbridled9 posted [p:946608396] in Will the U... [t:79073335]...</cite> <quote>I can think of a single situation in which the right attempts armed insurrection. It would be a situation in which Trump wins both the popular and electoral college (especially if by a landslide) but the electors defect and vote Biden. That is the only situation where I can see the right being willing to engage in a civil war because it means that, even if they win, they lose. At that point they may as well go for it. Let's face it; if that situation happened a lot of people would support the right as well. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Revelation34 11/02/20 7:50:45 PM #56:	YoukaiSlayer posted... Having guns is no better than bows and arrows at this point in warfare. Whichever side the military backs autowins cause you have drones and tanks which no amount of rednecks with illegally modified AR-15s can do anything about. Not to mention the overwhelming information advantage that satellites and air control supply. People don't seem to understand just HOW strong the military is. If you armed the ENTIRE GLOBAL POPULATION with assault rifles, the US military would still ANNIHILATE them. It wouldn't even be close. Part of why zombie moves are so dumb. The ONLY way a civil war could happen is if a sizeable faction of the military broke off but that would instantly become a global conflict because the world has a vested interest in what would happen so the idea that US citizens would have even minor influence over the outcome is beyond naive. It's also beyond absurd to assume the left would rebel over trump winning the electoral vote but biden winning the popular one. I feel like you guys must live in a parallel universe. I can only see Texas military personnel breaking off because of how patriotic they are to their state if a conflict involved the actual military. --- Gamertag: Kegfarms, BF code: 2033480226, Treasure Cruise code 318,374,355, Steam: Kegfarms <cite>Revelation34 posted [p:946634138] in Will the U... [t:79073335]...</cite> <quote>YoukaiSlayer posted...</cite> <quote>Having guns is no better than bows and arrows at this point in warfare. Whichever side the military backs autowins cause you have drones and tanks which no amount of rednecks with illegally modified AR-15s can do anything about. Not to mention the overwhelming information advantage that satellites and air control supply. People don't seem to understand just HOW strong the military is. If you armed the ENTIRE GLOBAL POPULATION with assault rifles, the US military would still ANNIHILATE them. It wouldn't even be close. Part of why zombie moves are so dumb. The ONLY way a civil war could happen is if a sizeable faction of the military broke off but that would instantly become a global conflict because the world has a vested interest in what would happen so the idea that US citizens would have even minor influence over the outcome is beyond naive. It's also beyond absurd to assume the left would rebel over trump winning the electoral vote but biden winning the popular one. I feel like you guys must live in a parallel universe. </quote> I can only see Texas military personnel breaking off because of how patriotic they are to their state if a conflict involved the actual military.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LinkPizza 11/03/20 2:38:04 AM #57:	Revelation34 posted... I can only see Texas military personnel breaking off because of how patriotic they are to their state if a conflict involved the actual military. When it comes to the military, it doesnt matter what state theyre in. Just because were in Texas doesnt mean were Uber patriotic or anything compared to other places. Maybe civilians. But military is different. Many of the people on my base dont even want to be here. Mainly the town, because it sucks (due to the old council). But many dont even want to be in the state. Not to mention, most of us are stuck here. Wed probably be fine if we could move to a new base every 2-4 years, but... --- Official King of Kings Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around. <cite>LinkPizza posted [p:946646547] in Will the U... [t:79073335]...</cite> <quote>Revelation34 posted...</cite> <quote>I can only see Texas military personnel breaking off because of how patriotic they are to their state if a conflict involved the actual military.</quote> When it comes to the military, it doesnt matter what state theyre in. Just because were in Texas doesnt mean were Uber patriotic or anything compared to other places. Maybe civilians. But military is different. Many of the people on my base dont even want to be here. Mainly the town, because it sucks (due to the old council). But many dont even want to be in the state. Not to mention, most of us are stuck here. Wed probably be fine if we could move to a new base every 2-4 years, but...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tha_Man_DS 11/03/20 4:03:38 AM #58:	If Biden becomes president... Yes. --- It's dangerous to go alone! Take this. Switch FC: SW-3553-2450-1242 <cite>Tha_Man_DS posted [p:946647735] in Will the U... [t:79073335]...</cite> <quote>If Biden becomes president... Yes. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LinkPizza 11/03/20 4:04:59 AM #59:	Tha_Man_DS posted... If Biden becomes president... Yes. So, you think the Trump supporters will go crazy and start a Civil War? --- Official King of Kings Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around. <cite>LinkPizza posted [p:946647746] in Will the U... [t:79073335]...</cite> <quote>Tha_Man_DS posted...</cite> <quote>If Biden becomes president... Yes.</quote> So, you think the Trump supporters will go crazy and start a Civil War?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tha_Man_DS 11/03/20 4:27:50 AM #60:	LinkPizza posted... So, you think the Trump supporters will go crazy and start a Civil War? No. Don't put words in my mouth. Biden's incompetence will start a civil war. --- It's dangerous to go alone! Take this. Switch FC: SW-3553-2450-1242 <cite>Tha_Man_DS posted [p:946648037] in Will the U... [t:79073335]...</cite> <quote>LinkPizza posted... </cite> <quote>So, you think the Trump supporters will go crazy and start a Civil War?</quote> No. Don't put words in my mouth. Biden's incompetence will start a civil war. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LinkPizza 11/03/20 4:40:46 AM #61:	Tha_Man_DS posted... No. Don't put words in my mouth. Biden's incompetence will start a civil war. It's not putting words in your mouth. It's called asking a question. Hence the question mark... Anyway, I also think you're wrong. --- Official King of Kings Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around. <cite>LinkPizza posted [p:946648185] in Will the U... [t:79073335]...</cite> <quote>Tha_Man_DS posted...</cite> <quote>No. Don't put words in my mouth. Biden's incompetence will start a civil war.</quote> It's not putting words in your mouth. It's called asking a question. Hence the question mark... Anyway, I also think you're wrong.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tha_Man_DS 11/03/20 4:47:18 AM #62:	LinkPizza posted... It's not putting words in your mouth. It's called asking a question. Hence the question mark... Anyway, I also think you're wrong. It's an assumption, with an ? at the end. And you can think whatever you want. :) --- It's dangerous to go alone! Take this. Switch FC: SW-3553-2450-1242 <cite>Tha_Man_DS posted [p:946648270] in Will the U... [t:79073335]...</cite> <quote>LinkPizza posted... </cite> <quote>It's not putting words in your mouth. It's called asking a question. Hence the question mark... Anyway, I also think you're wrong.</quote> It's an assumption, with an ? at the end. And you can think whatever you want. :) </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LinkPizza 11/03/20 5:05:49 AM #63:	Tha_Man_DS posted... It's an assumption, with an ? at the end. And you can think whatever you want. :) And it makes it a question. If the answer was no, you can say no... --- Official King of Kings Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around. <cite>LinkPizza posted [p:946648479] in Will the U... [t:79073335]...</cite> <quote>Tha_Man_DS posted...</cite> <quote>It's an assumption, with an ? at the end. And you can think whatever you want. :)</quote> And it makes it a question. If the answer was no, you can say no...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tha_Man_DS 11/03/20 5:07:59 AM #64:	LinkPizza posted... And it makes it a question. If the answer was no, you can say no... Tha_Man_DS posted... No. --- It's dangerous to go alone! Take this. Switch FC: SW-3553-2450-1242 <cite>Tha_Man_DS posted [p:946648505] in Will the U... [t:79073335]...</cite> <quote>LinkPizza posted... </cite> <quote>And it makes it a question. If the answer was no, you can say no...</quote> Tha_Man_DS posted... </cite> <quote>No.</quote> </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LinkPizza 11/03/20 5:48:46 AM #65:	Wow. Look how easy that was! Now you get it... --- Official King of Kings Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around. <cite>LinkPizza posted [p:946648973] in Will the U... [t:79073335]...</cite> <quote>Wow. Look how easy that was! Now you get it...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
YoukaiSlayer 11/03/20 6:02:13 AM #66:	LinkPizza posted... Depends I suppose it does. I generally think of infection style zombies since thats what most of the more modern movies are. Even with resurrection style though, people would see shit rising from graveyards and most of the original swarm would be extremely decomposed. They aren't fooling anyone into thinking they are just sick alive people. That version is also always incredibly slow and shambling, easily defeated by most architecture. People also really underestimate just how much corpses decay. We'd be looking at less than 1 billion corpses with the ability to rise. Probably far less. Dead people also smell REALLY bad. You aren't letting anything smelling that bad anywhere near you whether its alive or dead. With info spread, people have have phones and social media. It takes just one person to see a rotting corpse walking around to post it on facebook or something and then everyone knows. Most boats don't have frequent deaths on board so the info would spread to them before they had to worry about it, at least for 99%. I'm just not buying it. We are talking about things that normal civilians manage to take out 1000s of each and they start with less than the global population in an era with instant information spread. --- I'm ninja (you can't see me) <cite>YoukaiSlayer posted [p:946649160] in Will the U... [t:79073335]...</cite> <quote>LinkPizza posted... </cite> <quote>Depends</quote>I suppose it does. I generally think of infection style zombies since thats what most of the more modern movies are. Even with resurrection style though, people would see shit rising from graveyards and most of the original swarm would be extremely decomposed. They aren't fooling anyone into thinking they are just sick alive people. That version is also always incredibly slow and shambling, easily defeated by most architecture. People also really underestimate just how much corpses decay. We'd be looking at less than 1 billion corpses with the ability to rise. Probably far less. Dead people also smell REALLY bad. You aren't letting anything smelling that bad anywhere near you whether its alive or dead. With info spread, people have have phones and social media. It takes just one person to see a rotting corpse walking around to post it on facebook or something and then everyone knows. Most boats don't have frequent deaths on board so the info would spread to them before they had to worry about it, at least for 99%. I'm just not buying it. We are talking about things that normal civilians manage to take out 1000s of each and they start with less than the global population in an era with instant information spread. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tha_Man_DS 11/03/20 6:10:11 AM #67:	LinkPizza posted... Wow. Look how easy that was! Now you get it... Dude. That was literally the first word of my answer to your "question"... Read. --- It's dangerous to go alone! Take this. Switch FC: SW-3553-2450-1242 <cite>Tha_Man_DS posted [p:946649259] in Will the U... [t:79073335]...</cite> <quote>LinkPizza posted... </cite> <quote>Wow. Look how easy that was! Now you get it...</quote> Dude. That was literally the first word of my answer to your "question"... Read. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LinkPizza 11/03/20 6:19:57 AM #68:	YoukaiSlayer posted... I suppose it does. I generally think of infection style zombies since thats what most of the more modern movies are. Even with resurrection style though, people would see shit rising from graveyards and most of the original swarm would be extremely decomposed. They aren't fooling anyone into thinking they are just sick alive people. That version is also always incredibly slow and shambling, easily defeated by most architecture. People also really underestimate just how much corpses decay. We'd be looking at less than 1 billion corpses with the ability to rise. Probably far less. Dead people also smell REALLY bad. You aren't letting anything smelling that bad anywhere near you whether its alive or dead. With info spread, people have have phones and social media. It takes just one person to see a rotting corpse walking around to post it on facebook or something and then everyone knows. Most boats don't have frequent deaths on board so the info would spread to them before they had to worry about it, at least for 99%. I'm just not buying it. We are talking about things that normal civilians manage to take out 1000s of each and they start with less than the global population in an era with instant information spread. I always wondered if the virus somehow slowed the decay. Because even in the walking dead video game, they are still around years later. And lots of them. I know there are a lot of people on Earth, but it always seems like a crazy amount to still be around... And they do smell. I'm guessing that either it's a fresh one that got close. Or maybe seeing a certain loved one froze you, even with the smell. Though, it's hard to tell. And these days, info does spread faster. Only if because people are always recording. That being said, it would be also a challenge to know if it was a hoax or not. Even in my town (or close by), we have (or use to have) an annual zombie run. Everyone dresses up like Zombies and runs for a charity. I don't remember much about it, I just handed out water. And I think they have had stuff like that before. Like zombie parties and whatnot. Which could make it hard to tell truth from hoax... Especially since in real life, most people wouldn't think zombie could exist... Though, in the end, it really depends. If they get a bunch of people that can't take them out (or can't take them out fast enough), their numbers can grow rapidly. Not to mention, for some reason (usually because they don't know it movies), they don't go for the head. Which makes sense. Headshots (especially with certain weapons) are hard. And if your opponent isn't wearing armor, your taught to shoot for the body since it's a bigger target. --- Official King of Kings Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around. <cite>LinkPizza posted [p:946649377] in Will the U... [t:79073335]...</cite> <quote>YoukaiSlayer posted...</cite> <quote>I suppose it does. I generally think of infection style zombies since thats what most of the more modern movies are. Even with resurrection style though, people would see shit rising from graveyards and most of the original swarm would be extremely decomposed. They aren't fooling anyone into thinking they are just sick alive people. That version is also always incredibly slow and shambling, easily defeated by most architecture. People also really underestimate just how much corpses decay. We'd be looking at less than 1 billion corpses with the ability to rise. Probably far less. Dead people also smell REALLY bad. You aren't letting anything smelling that bad anywhere near you whether its alive or dead. With info spread, people have have phones and social media. It takes just one person to see a rotting corpse walking around to post it on facebook or something and then everyone knows. Most boats don't have frequent deaths on board so the info would spread to them before they had to worry about it, at least for 99%. I'm just not buying it. We are talking about things that normal civilians manage to take out 1000s of each and they start with less than the global population in an era with instant information spread.</quote> I always wondered if the virus somehow slowed the decay. Because even in the walking dead video game, they are still around years later. And lots of them. I know there are a lot of people on Earth, but it always seems like a crazy amount to still be around... And they do smell. I'm guessing that either it's a fresh one that got close. Or maybe seeing a certain loved one froze you, even with the smell. Though, it's hard to tell. And these days, info does spread faster. Only if because people are always recording. That being said, it would be also a challenge to know if it was a hoax or not. Even in my town (or close by), we have (or use to have) an annual zombie run. Everyone dresses up like Zombies and runs for a charity. I don't remember much about it, I just handed out water. And I think they have had stuff like that before. Like zombie parties and whatnot. Which could make it hard to tell truth from hoax... Especially since in real life, most people wouldn't think zombie could exist... Though, in the end, it really depends. If they get a bunch of people that can't take them out (or can't take them out fast enough), their numbers can grow rapidly. Not to mention, for some reason (usually because they don't know it movies), they don't go for the head. Which makes sense. Headshots (especially with certain weapons) are hard. And if your opponent isn't wearing armor, your taught to shoot for the body since it's a bigger target.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LinkPizza 11/03/20 6:20:54 AM #69:	Tha_Man_DS posted... Dude. That was literally the first word of my answer to your "question"... Read. Yeah. And that's all you had to say. But then you started adding extra stuff like saying I was putting words in your mouth and shit... --- Official King of Kings Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around. <cite>LinkPizza posted [p:946649388] in Will the U... [t:79073335]...</cite> <quote>Tha_Man_DS posted...</cite> <quote>Dude. That was literally the first word of my answer to your "question"... Read.</quote> Yeah. And that's all you had to say. But then you started adding extra stuff like saying I was putting words in your mouth and shit...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tha_Man_DS 11/03/20 6:41:07 AM #70:	LinkPizza posted... Yeah. And that's all you had to say. But then you started adding extra stuff like saying I was putting words in your mouth and shit... You'd literally asked for a 'no' AFTER I already "gave" it to you. Talking about 'shit', huh? :) --- It's dangerous to go alone! Take this. Switch FC: SW-3553-2450-1242 <cite>Tha_Man_DS posted [p:946649653] in Will the U... [t:79073335]...</cite> <quote>LinkPizza posted... </cite> <quote>Yeah. And that's all you had to say. But then you started adding extra stuff like saying I was putting words in your mouth and shit...</quote> You'd literally asked for a 'no' AFTER I already "gave" it to you. Talking about 'shit', huh? :) </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LinkPizza 11/03/20 6:51:13 AM #71:	Tha_Man_DS posted... You'd literally asked for a 'no' AFTER I already "gave" it to you. Talking about 'shit', huh? :) No I didnt. I was saying that thats all you had to say. You couldve said no without adding all the put words in my mouth stuff... --- Official King of Kings Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around. <cite>LinkPizza posted [p:946649793] in Will the U... [t:79073335]...</cite> <quote>Tha_Man_DS posted...</cite> <quote>You'd literally asked for a 'no' AFTER I already "gave" it to you. Talking about 'shit', huh? :)</quote> No I didnt. I was saying that thats all you had to say. You couldve said no without adding all the put words in my mouth stuff...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tha_Man_DS 11/03/20 6:56:39 AM #72:	LinkPizza posted... No I didnt. I was saying that thats all you had to say. You couldve said no without adding all the put words in my mouth stuff... Yes, you did. I said 'No' and you said: 'If the answer was no, you can say no...' AFTERWARDS. ;) And yeah... Could've. I say whatever I want to say, not what you want me to say. Freedom of speech (or in this case: typing), that is. --- It's dangerous to go alone! Take this. Switch FC: SW-3553-2450-1242 <cite>Tha_Man_DS posted [p:946649888] in Will the U... [t:79073335]...</cite> <quote>LinkPizza posted... </cite> <quote>No I didnt. I was saying that thats all you had to say. You couldve said no without adding all the put words in my mouth stuff...</quote> Yes, you did. I said 'No' and you said: 'If the answer was no, you can say no...' AFTERWARDS. ;) And yeah... Could've. I say whatever I want to say, not what you want me to say. Freedom of speech (or in this case: typing), that is. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Sarcasthma 11/03/20 7:04:41 AM #73:	Tha_Man_DS posted... Freedom of speech (or in this case: typing), that is. That doesn't apply to internet forums, you dink. --- What's the difference between a pickpocket and a peeping tom? A pickpocket snatches your watch. <cite>Sarcasthma posted [p:946649984] in Will the U... [t:79073335]...</cite> <quote>Tha_Man_DS posted... </cite> <quote>Freedom of speech (or in this case: typing), that is.</quote>That doesn't apply to internet forums, you dink. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LinkPizza 11/03/20 7:10:57 AM #74:	Tha_Man_DS posted... Yes, you did. I said 'No' and you said: 'If the answer was no, you can say no...' AFTERWARDS. ;) And yeah... Could've. I say whatever I want to say, not what you want me to say. Freedom of speech (or in this case: typing), that is. Nope. My first response was about how I wasn't putting words in your mouth. And my second was was saying that is was a question and saying you could said no. Maybe I should've added the word just, but I thought you'd be able to understand. Guess I wrong and you didn't. And I'm not saying you can't say whatever. I was saying you could've just said that. If all you said was no, we wouldn't even be talking... So, I guess this it what you wanted or whatever... --- Official King of Kings Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around. <cite>LinkPizza posted [p:946650092] in Will the U... [t:79073335]...</cite> <quote>Tha_Man_DS posted...</cite> <quote>Yes, you did. I said 'No' and you said: 'If the answer was no, you can say no...' AFTERWARDS. ;) And yeah... Could've. I say whatever I want to say, not what you want me to say. Freedom of speech (or in this case: typing), that is.</quote> Nope. My first response was about how I wasn't putting words in your mouth. And my second was was saying that is was a question and saying you could said no. Maybe I should've added the word just, but I thought you'd be able to understand. Guess I wrong and you didn't. And I'm not saying you can't say whatever. I was saying you could've just said that. If all you said was no, we wouldn't even be talking... So, I guess this it what you wanted or whatever...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tha_Man_DS 11/03/20 7:33:18 AM #75:	Sarcasthma posted... That doesn't apply to internet forums, you dink. What? :'-D LinkPizza posted... Nope. My first response was about how I wasn't putting words in your mouth. And my second was was saying that is was a question and saying you could said no. Maybe I should've added the word just, but I thought you'd be able to understand. Guess I wrong and you didn't. I never said: 'If the answer was no, you can say no...', was your first response, though... I said just said that you said it afterwards. Which is factually, 100% correct. No. Don't blame this one me. You lack reading and writing skills, which caused this discussion. THAT'S the real problem. :) And I'm not saying you can't say whatever. Good. --- It's dangerous to go alone! Take this. Switch FC: SW-3553-2450-1242 <cite>Tha_Man_DS posted [p:946650482] in Will the U... [t:79073335]...</cite> <quote>Sarcasthma posted... </cite> <quote>That doesn't apply to internet forums, you dink.</quote>What? :'-D LinkPizza posted... </cite> <quote>Nope. My first response was about how I wasn't putting words in your mouth. And my second was was saying that is was a question and saying you could said no. Maybe I should've added the word just, but I thought you'd be able to understand. Guess I wrong and you didn't.</quote>I never said: 'If the answer was no, you can say no...', was your first response, though... I said just said that you said it afterwards. Which is factually, 100% correct. No. Don't blame this one me. You lack reading and writing skills, which caused this discussion. THAT'S the real problem. :) <quote>And I'm not saying you can't say whatever.</quote>Good. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LinkPizza 11/03/20 7:36:31 AM #76:	Tha_Man_DS posted... I never said: 'If the answer was no, you can say no...', I never said you said that. I said that is was my second response. Tha_Man_DS posted... No. Don't blame this one me. You lack reading and writing skills. THAT'S the real problem. :) Seems to be your problem, according to the post above... --- Official King of Kings Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around. <cite>LinkPizza posted [p:946650535] in Will the U... [t:79073335]...</cite> <quote>Tha_Man_DS posted...</cite> <quote>I never said: 'If the answer was no, you can say no...', </quote> I never said you said that. I said that is was my second response. Tha_Man_DS posted...</cite> <quote>No. Don't blame this one me. You lack reading and writing skills. THAT'S the real problem. :)</quote> Seems to be your problem, according to the post above...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tha_Man_DS 11/03/20 7:39:03 AM #77:	LinkPizza posted... I said that is was my second response. WHY even bring it up then? :'-) LinkPizza posted... Seems to be your problem, according to the post above... Again: Tha_Man_DS posted... Don't blame this one me. Tha_Man_DS posted... Yes, you did. I said 'No' and you said: 'If the answer was no, you can say no...' AFTERWARDS. ;) LinkPizza posted... Nope. YES. You can literally see it on this the other pages. You're factually wrong. Period. --- It's dangerous to go alone! Take this. Switch FC: SW-3553-2450-1242 <cite>Tha_Man_DS posted [p:946650575] in Will the U... [t:79073335]...</cite> <quote>LinkPizza posted... </cite> <quote>I said that is was my second response.</quote>WHY even bring it up then? :'-) LinkPizza posted... </cite> <quote>Seems to be your problem, according to the post above...</quote>Again: Tha_Man_DS posted... </cite> <quote>Don't blame this one me.</quote> Tha_Man_DS posted... </cite> <quote>Yes, you did. I said 'No' and you said: 'If the answer was no, you can say no...' AFTERWARDS. ;)</quote>LinkPizza posted... </cite> <quote>Nope.</quote>YES. You can literally see it on this the other pages. You're factually wrong. Period. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LinkPizza 11/03/20 7:43:20 AM #79:	Tha_Man_DS posted... WHY even bring it up then? :'-) Because that's the quote in question, right? The one where I said, "If the answer was no, you can say no..." Which by it I meant, that's all you had to say rather than all the other stuff like when you thought I put words in your mouth. Literally the reason this conversation is still going. Tha_Man_DS posted... Don't blame this one me. Just putting where it belongs, which is on you, so... --- Official King of Kings Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around. <cite>LinkPizza posted [p:946650667] in Will the U... [t:79073335]...</cite> <quote>Tha_Man_DS posted...</cite> <quote>WHY even bring it up then? :'-)</quote> Because that's the quote in question, right? The one where I said, "If the answer was no, you can say no..." Which by it I meant, that's all you had to say rather than all the other stuff like when you thought I put words in your mouth. Literally the reason this conversation is still going. Tha_Man_DS posted...</cite> <quote>Don't blame this one me.</quote> Just putting where it belongs, which is on you, so...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tha_Man_DS 11/03/20 7:44:52 AM #80:	LinkPizza posted... Because that's the quote in question, right? The one where I said, "If the answer was no, you can say no..." Which by it I meant, that's all you had to say rather than all the other stuff like when you thought I put words in your mouth. Literally the reason this conversation is still going. Just putting where it belongs, which is on you, so... Not the brightest kid in school, huh? :) --- It's dangerous to go alone! Take this. Switch FC: SW-3553-2450-1242 <cite>Tha_Man_DS posted [p:946650702] in Will the U... [t:79073335]...</cite> <quote>LinkPizza posted... </cite> <quote>Because that's the quote in question, right? The one where I said, "If the answer was no, you can say no..." Which by it I meant, that's all you had to say rather than all the other stuff like when you thought I put words in your mouth. Literally the reason this conversation is still going. Just putting where it belongs, which is on you, so...</quote>Not the brightest kid in school, huh? :) </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LinkPizza 11/03/20 7:45:35 AM #81:	Tha_Man_DS posted... Not the brightest kid in school, huh? :) Seems like I'm at least brighter than you... --- Official King of Kings Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around. <cite>LinkPizza posted [p:946650726] in Will the U... [t:79073335]...</cite> <quote>Tha_Man_DS posted...</cite> <quote>Not the brightest kid in school, huh? :)</quote> Seems like I'm at least brighter than you...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tha_Man_DS 11/03/20 7:48:36 AM #82:	LinkPizza posted... Seems like I'm at least brighter than you... Yeah. Just skip the other comment where I prove you wrong. And yes... You're a bright, special star. :) --- It's dangerous to go alone! Take this. Switch FC: SW-3553-2450-1242 <cite>Tha_Man_DS posted [p:946650794] in Will the U... [t:79073335]...</cite> <quote>LinkPizza posted... </cite> <quote>Seems like I'm at least brighter than you...</quote> Yeah. Just skip the other comment where I prove you wrong. And yes... You're a bright, special star. :) </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LinkPizza 11/03/20 7:50:11 AM #83:	Tha_Man_DS posted... Yeah. Just skip the other comment where I prove you wrong. And yes... You're a bright, special star. :) Why don't you quote it for me if you're so smart? Because I don't see a comment that proves anything... --- Official King of Kings Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around. <cite>LinkPizza posted [p:946650834] in Will the U... [t:79073335]...</cite> <quote>Tha_Man_DS posted...</cite> <quote>Yeah. Just skip the other comment where I prove you wrong. And yes... You're a bright, special star. :)</quote> Why don't you quote it for me if you're so smart? Because I don't see a comment that proves anything...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tha_Man_DS 11/03/20 7:54:10 AM #84:	LinkPizza posted... Why don't you quote it for me if you're so smart? Because I don't see a comment that proves anything... Holy... Tha_Man_DS posted... I said 'No' and you said: 'If the answer was no, you can say no...' AFTERWARDS. This is 100% correct. Just go back a page or 2 and read. LinkPizza posted... Nope. And you still deny it. :) --- It's dangerous to go alone! Take this. Switch FC: SW-3553-2450-1242 <cite>Tha_Man_DS posted [p:946650912] in Will the U... [t:79073335]...</cite> <quote>LinkPizza posted... </cite> <quote>Why don't you quote it for me if you're so smart? Because I don't see a comment that proves anything...</quote>Holy... Tha_Man_DS posted... </cite> <quote>I said 'No' and you said: 'If the answer was no, you can say no...' AFTERWARDS.</quote>This is 100% correct. Just go back a page or 2 and read. LinkPizza posted... </cite> <quote>Nope.</quote>And you still deny it. :) </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LinkPizza 11/03/20 7:57:44 AM #85:	Tha_Man_DS posted... This is 100% correct. Just go back a page or 2 and read. Obviously. No one said you didn't say no. Maybe you missed what I said earlier, though. Which was: LinkPizza posted... The one where I said, "If the answer was no, you can say no..." Which by it I meant, that's all you had to say rather than all the other stuff like when you thought I put words in your mouth. Which means I know you said no. I was saying you didn't have to go on a rant about me putting words in your mouth while saying no. Especially since I didn't put words in your mouth. Tha_Man_DS posted... And you still deny it. Denying what? Prove when I ever denied you said no. --- Official King of Kings Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around. <cite>LinkPizza posted [p:946650981] in Will the U... [t:79073335]...</cite> <quote>Tha_Man_DS posted...</cite> <quote>This is 100% correct. Just go back a page or 2 and read.</quote> Obviously. No one said you didn't say no. Maybe you missed what I said earlier, though. Which was: LinkPizza posted...</cite> <quote>The one where I said, "If the answer was no, you can say no..." Which by it I meant, that's all you had to say rather than all the other stuff like when you thought I put words in your mouth.</quote> Which means I know you said no. I was saying you didn't have to go on a rant about me putting words in your mouth while saying no. Especially since I didn't put words in your mouth. Tha_Man_DS posted...</cite> <quote>And you still deny it.</quote> Denying what? Prove when I ever denied you said no.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Sarcasthma 11/03/20 8:03:14 AM #86:	Tha_Man_DS posted... What? :'-D This is a private website, so they can delete any of your messages as they see fit. :p The First Amendment doesn't apply here. --- What's the difference between a pickpocket and a peeping tom? A pickpocket snatches your watch. <cite>Sarcasthma posted [p:946651081] in Will the U... [t:79073335]...</cite> <quote>Tha_Man_DS posted... </cite> <quote>What? :'-D</quote>This is a private website, so they can delete any of your messages as they see fit. :p The First Amendment doesn't apply here. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tha_Man_DS 11/03/20 8:16:05 AM #87:	LinkPizza posted... Prove when I ever denied you said no. Me: I said 'No' and you said: 'If the answer was no, you can say no...' AFTERWARDS. You: Nope. I never said you denied I said no. Im saying youre denying that I said no BEFORE you said 'If the answer was no, you can say no...'. Youre nope verifies that. Sarcasthma posted... This is a private website, so they can delete any of your messages as they see fit. :p The First Amendment doesn't apply here. Still a public forum, with guaranteed free speech. --- It's dangerous to go alone! Take this. Switch FC: SW-3553-2450-1242 <cite>Tha_Man_DS posted [p:946651336] in Will the U... [t:79073335]...</cite> <quote>LinkPizza posted... </cite> <quote>Prove when I ever denied you said no.</quote> Me: <quote>I said 'No' and you said: 'If the answer was no, you can say no...' AFTERWARDS.</quote>You: <quote>Nope.</quote> I never said you denied I said no. Im saying youre denying that I said no BEFORE you said 'If the answer was no, you can say no...'. Youre nope verifies that. Sarcasthma posted... </cite> <quote>This is a private website, so they can delete any of your messages as they see fit. :p The First Amendment doesn't apply here.</quote>Still a public forum, with guaranteed free speech. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LinkPizza 11/03/20 8:38:42 AM #88:	Tha_Man_DS posted... I never said you denied I said no. Im saying youre denying that I said no BEFORE you said 'If the answer was no, you can say no...'. Youre nope verifies that. Except thats no what Im denying. I know you said already. I responded to that post. The only reason I said was because you said no and then said all the other stuff. If you hadnt said no, then instead, I would have said, Yes or No. By me saying, You couldve said no, it meant I knew you said no. Which should have been in the post that Ive already posted multiple times... LinkPizza posted... The one where I said, "If the answer was no, you can say no..." Which by it I meant, that's all you had to say rather than all the other stuff like when you thought I put words in your mouth. Which I explained here... LinkPizza posted... Which means I know you said no. I was saying you didn't have to go on a rant about me putting words in your mouth while saying no. Especially since I didn't put words in your mouth. I knew you already said no. Thats why I never asked if the answer was yes or no. Why else would I say you could just said no... --- Official King of Kings Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around. <cite>LinkPizza posted [p:946651902] in Will the U... [t:79073335]...</cite> <quote>Tha_Man_DS posted...</cite> <quote>I never said you denied I said no. Im saying youre denying that I said no BEFORE you said 'If the answer was no, you can say no...'. Youre nope verifies that.</quote> Except thats no what Im denying. I know you said already. I responded to that post. The only reason I said was because you said no and then said all the other stuff. If you hadnt said no, then instead, I would have said, Yes or No. By me saying, You couldve said no, it meant I knew you said no. Which should have been in the post that Ive already posted multiple times... LinkPizza posted...</cite> <quote>The one where I said, "If the answer was no, you can say no..." Which by it I meant, that's all you had to say rather than all the other stuff like when you thought I put words in your mouth.</quote> Which I explained here... LinkPizza posted...</cite> <quote>Which means I know you said no. I was saying you didn't have to go on a rant about me putting words in your mouth while saying no. Especially since I didn't put words in your mouth.</quote> I knew you already said no. Thats why I never asked if the answer was yes or no. Why else would I say you could just said no...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Sarcasthma 11/03/20 8:41:18 AM #89:	Tha_Man_DS posted... Still a public forum, with guaranteed free speech. Incorrect. --- What's the difference between a pickpocket and a peeping tom? A pickpocket snatches your watch. <cite>Sarcasthma posted [p:946651964] in Will the U... [t:79073335]...</cite> <quote>Tha_Man_DS posted... </cite> <quote>Still a public forum, with guaranteed free speech.</quote>Incorrect. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LinkPizza 11/03/20 8:41:29 AM #90:	Tha_Man_DS posted... Still a public forum, with guaranteed free speech. Actually, I think the site is owned. So, that means mods could delete anything they want and you couldnt really do anything about it. You wont go to jail for it. But they could delete anything they want and ban you for breaking any rules... Even in speech, since they do have rules about what you can and cant say. And stuff like that. So, if you mean guaranteed free speech while your post of anything can be deleted, then youre right. But the site owners can actually control the speech to a certain degree... --- Official King of Kings Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around. <cite>LinkPizza posted [p:946651971] in Will the U... [t:79073335]...</cite> <quote>Tha_Man_DS posted...</cite> <quote>Still a public forum, with guaranteed free speech.</quote> Actually, I think the site is owned. So, that means mods could delete anything they want and you couldnt really do anything about it. You wont go to jail for it. But they could delete anything they want and ban you for breaking any rules... Even in speech, since they do have rules about what you can and cant say. And stuff like that. So, if you mean guaranteed free speech while your post of anything can be deleted, then youre right. But the site owners can actually control the speech to a certain degree...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
YoukaiSlayer 11/03/20 8:55:59 AM #91:	I mean, he is guaranteed that he won't be arrested for speaking his mind, but he is in no way guaranteed not to be modded or removed from the platform. --- I'm ninja (you can't see me) <cite>YoukaiSlayer posted [p:946652361] in Will the U... [t:79073335]...</cite> <quote>I mean, he is guaranteed that he won't be arrested for speaking his mind, but he is in no way guaranteed not to be modded or removed from the platform. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LinkPizza 11/03/20 8:57:26 AM #92:	YoukaiSlayer posted... I mean, he is guaranteed that he won't be arrested for speaking his mind, but he is in no way guaranteed not to be modded or removed from the platform. Right! --- Official King of Kings Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around. <cite>LinkPizza posted [p:946652400] in Will the U... [t:79073335]...</cite> <quote>YoukaiSlayer posted...</cite> <quote>I mean, he is guaranteed that he won't be arrested for speaking his mind, but he is in no way guaranteed not to be modded or removed from the platform. </quote> Right!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BlackScythe0 11/03/20 9:07:49 AM #93:	Sarcasthma posted... Incorrect. No he still has free speech, he isn't going to be jailed or fined for any protected speech he makes here. Though typically people who bring up free speech on a forum generally have no clue what it is. <cite>BlackScythe0 posted [p:946652674] in Will the U... [t:79073335]...</cite> <quote>Sarcasthma posted... </cite> <quote>Incorrect.</quote> No he still has free speech, he isn't going to be jailed or fined for any protected speech he makes here. Though typically people who bring up free speech on a forum generally have no clue what it is. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tha_Man_DS 11/03/20 9:14:24 AM #94:	LinkPizza posted... Except thats no what Im denying. I know you said already. I responded to that post. The only reason I said was because you said no and then said all the other stuff. If you hadnt said no, then instead, I would have said, Yes or No. By me saying, You couldve said no, it meant I knew you said no. Which should have been in the post that Ive already posted multiple times... So, what is that 'Nope' directed at then? It can't be anything other than my quoted comment above it. Please enlighten me. What are you denying with that 'Nope'? LinkPizza posted... So, if you mean guaranteed free speech while your post of anything can be deleted, then youre right. Yes. 'Cause I can still post whatever I want and it won't have any severe consequences, even when deleted. I'm not going to say crazy or outrageous stuff, btw. YoukaiSlayer posted... I mean, he is guaranteed that he won't be arrested for speaking his mind, but he is in no way guaranteed not to be modded or removed from the platform. True, but ^. BlackScythe0 posted... No he still has free speech, he isn't going to be jailed or fined for any protected speech he makes here. Though typically people who bring up free speech on a forum generally have no clue what it is. I do have a clue, though. And the first part of you comment is indeed correct. --- It's dangerous to go alone! Take this. Switch FC: SW-3553-2450-1242 <cite>Tha_Man_DS posted [p:946652847] in Will the U... [t:79073335]...</cite> <quote>LinkPizza posted... </cite> <quote>Except thats no what Im denying. I know you said already. I responded to that post. The only reason I said was because you said no and then said all the other stuff. If you hadnt said no, then instead, I would have said, Yes or No. By me saying, You couldve said no, it meant I knew you said no. Which should have been in the post that Ive already posted multiple times...</quote> So, what is that 'Nope' directed at then? It can't be anything other than my quoted comment above it. Please enlighten me. What are you denying with that 'Nope'? LinkPizza posted... </cite> <quote>So, if you mean guaranteed free speech while your post of anything can be deleted, then youre right.</quote>Yes. 'Cause I can still post whatever I want and it won't have any severe consequences, even when deleted. I'm not going to say crazy or outrageous stuff, btw. YoukaiSlayer posted... </cite> <quote>I mean, he is guaranteed that he won't be arrested for speaking his mind, but he is in no way guaranteed not to be modded or removed from the platform.</quote>True, but ^. BlackScythe0 posted... </cite> <quote>No he still has free speech, he isn't going to be jailed or fined for any protected speech he makes here. Though typically people who bring up free speech on a forum generally have no clue what it is.</quote>I do have a clue, though. And the first part of you comment is indeed correct. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LinkPizza 11/03/20 9:23:50 AM #95:	Tha_Man_DS posted... So, what is that 'Nope' directed at then? It can't be anything other than my quoted comment above it. Please enlighten me. What are you denying with that 'Nope'? Easy. It was to the first part of the post. I'll help you out though... After the first quote, pay attention to the bolded parts. You said, "You'd literally asked for a 'no' AFTER I already "gave" it to you. Talking about 'shit', huh? :)" I respoded, "No I didnt. I was saying that thats all you had to say. You couldve said no without adding all the put words in my mouth stuff..." You then said, "Yes, you did. I said 'No' and you said: 'If the answer was no, you can say no...' AFTERWARDS. ;) And yeah... Could've. I say whatever I want to say, not what you want me to say. Freedom of speech (or in this case: typing), that is." And lastly, I said, "Nope. My first response was about how I wasn't putting words in your mouth. And my second was was saying that is was a question and saying you could said no. Maybe I should've added the word just, but I thought you'd be able to understand. Guess I wrong and you didn't." So, to explain, my nope was to the first part, which basically me saying no to asking you to say "no" after you had already said it. That's why it was the first part of the sentence. Because I was replying to your first part. I already know you said no. You didn't have to say it again. All you had to do was read the post before to see that... --- Official King of Kings Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around. <cite>LinkPizza posted [p:946653115] in Will the U... [t:79073335]...</cite> <quote>Tha_Man_DS posted...</cite> <quote>So, what is that 'Nope' directed at then? It can't be anything other than my quoted comment above it. Please enlighten me. What are you denying with that 'Nope'?</quote> Easy. It was to the first part of the post. I'll help you out though... After the first quote, pay attention to the bolded parts. You said, "You'd literally asked for a 'no' AFTER I already "gave" it to you. Talking about 'shit', huh? :)" I respoded, "No I didnt. I was saying that thats all you had to say. You couldve said no without adding all the put words in my mouth stuff..." You then said, "Yes, you did. I said 'No' and you said: 'If the answer was no, you can say no...' AFTERWARDS. ;) And yeah... Could've. I say whatever I want to say, not what you want me to say. Freedom of speech (or in this case: typing), that is." And lastly, I said, "Nope. My first response was about how I wasn't putting words in your mouth. And my second was was saying that is was a question and saying you could said no. Maybe I should've added the word just, but I thought you'd be able to understand. Guess I wrong and you didn't." So, to explain, my nope was to the first part, which basically me saying no to asking you to say "no" after you had already said it. That's why it was the first part of the sentence. Because I was replying to your first part. I already know you said no. You didn't have to say it again. All you had to do was read the post before to see that...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SunWuKung420 11/03/20 9:33:12 AM #96:	Unbridled9 posted... I use the term because that's the best way I can describe them. In reality it will likely be mobs that will form whenever they encounter anyone who disagrees with them politically; similar to what we're seeing now in places like Philadelphia. There are no roaming squads attacking people in Philly. @Unbridled9 --- Society is built on a mass hallucination. <cite>SunWuKung420 posted [p:946653373] in Will the U... [t:79073335]...</cite> <quote>Unbridled9 posted... </cite> <quote> I use the term because that's the best way I can describe them. In reality it will likely be mobs that will form whenever they encounter anyone who disagrees with them politically; similar to what we're seeing now in places like Philadelphia.</quote>There are no roaming squads attacking people in Philly. @Unbridled9 </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tha_Man_DS 11/03/20 9:37:44 AM #97:	LinkPizza posted... Easy. It was to the first part of the post. I'll help you out though... After the first quote, pay attention to the bolded parts. You said, "You'd literally asked for a 'no' AFTER I already "gave" it to you. Talking about 'shit', huh? :)" I respoded, "No I didnt. I was saying that thats all you had to say. You couldve said no without adding all the put words in my mouth stuff..." You then said, "Yes, you did. I said 'No' and you said: 'If the answer was no, you can say no...' AFTERWARDS. ;) And yeah... Could've. I say whatever I want to say, not what you want me to say. Freedom of speech (or in this case: typing), that is." And lastly, I said, "Nope. My first response was about how I wasn't putting words in your mouth. And my second was was saying that is was a question and saying you could said no. Maybe I should've added the word just, but I thought you'd be able to understand. Guess I wrong and you didn't." So, to explain, my nope was to the first part, which basically me saying no to asking you to say "no" after you had already said it. That's why it was the first part of the sentence. Because I was replying to your first part. I already know you said no. You didn't have to say it again. All you had to do was read the post before to see that... To be clear: You're 'Nope' was a direct response to my sentence: 'I said 'No' and you said: 'If the answer was no, you can say no...' AFTERWARDS.'? --- It's dangerous to go alone! Take this. Switch FC: SW-3553-2450-1242 <cite>Tha_Man_DS posted [p:946653506] in Will the U... [t:79073335]...</cite> <quote>LinkPizza posted... </cite> <quote>Easy. It was to the first part of the post. I'll help you out though... After the first quote, pay attention to the bolded parts. You said, "You'd literally asked for a 'no' AFTER I already "gave" it to you. Talking about 'shit', huh? :)" I respoded, "No I didnt. I was saying that thats all you had to say. You couldve said no without adding all the put words in my mouth stuff..." You then said, "Yes, you did. I said 'No' and you said: 'If the answer was no, you can say no...' AFTERWARDS. ;) And yeah... Could've. I say whatever I want to say, not what you want me to say. Freedom of speech (or in this case: typing), that is." And lastly, I said, "Nope. My first response was about how I wasn't putting words in your mouth. And my second was was saying that is was a question and saying you could said no. Maybe I should've added the word just, but I thought you'd be able to understand. Guess I wrong and you didn't." So, to explain, my nope was to the first part, which basically me saying no to asking you to say "no" after you had already said it. That's why it was the first part of the sentence. Because I was replying to your first part. I already know you said no. You didn't have to say it again. All you had to do was read the post before to see that...</quote> To be clear: You're 'Nope' was a direct response to my sentence: 'I said 'No' and you said: 'If the answer was no, you can say no...' AFTERWARDS.'? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
teddy241 11/03/20 9:38:52 AM #98:	lock n load. get ready for survival of the fittest <cite>teddy241 posted [p:946653547] in Will the U... [t:79073335]...</cite> <quote>lock n load. get ready for survival of the fittest </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LinkPizza 11/03/20 9:50:22 AM #99:	Tha_Man_DS posted... To be clear: You're 'Nope' was a direct response to my sentence: 'I said 'No' and you said: 'If the answer was no, you can say no...' AFTERWARDS.'? No. My nope was the reply to Yes, you did. My My first response was about how I wasn't putting words in your mouth. And my second was was saying that is was a question and saying you could said no. Maybe I should've added the word just, but I thought you'd be able to understand. Guess I wrong and you didn't. was me explaining my earlier post to go along with that to show that you didnt need to say no again. --- Official King of Kings Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around. <cite>LinkPizza posted [p:946653919] in Will the U... [t:79073335]...</cite> <quote>Tha_Man_DS posted...</cite> <quote>To be clear: You're 'Nope' was a direct response to my sentence: 'I said 'No' and you said: 'If the answer was no, you can say no...' AFTERWARDS.'?</quote> No. My nope was the reply to Yes, you did. My My first response was about how I wasn't putting words in your mouth. And my second was was saying that is was a question and saying you could said no. Maybe I should've added the word just, but I thought you'd be able to understand. Guess I wrong and you didn't. was me explaining my earlier post to go along with that to show that you didnt need to say no again.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tha_Man_DS 11/03/20 10:10:10 AM #100:	LinkPizza posted... No. My nope was the reply to Yes, you did. My My first response was about how I wasn't putting words in your mouth. And my second was was saying that is was a question and saying you could said no. Maybe I should've added the word just, but I thought you'd be able to understand. Guess I wrong and you didn't. was me explaining my earlier post to go along with that to show that you didnt need to say no again. So, you deny asking for a 'no', after I said 'no', after which you said 'If the answer was no, you can say no...'? You: 'If the answer was no, you can say no...' Me BEFORE that: 'No.' --- It's dangerous to go alone! Take this. Switch FC: SW-3553-2450-1242 <cite>Tha_Man_DS posted [p:946654492] in Will the U... [t:79073335]...</cite> <quote>LinkPizza posted... </cite> <quote>No. My nope was the reply to Yes, you did. My My first response was about how I wasn't putting words in your mouth. And my second was was saying that is was a question and saying you could said no. Maybe I should've added the word just, but I thought you'd be able to understand. Guess I wrong and you didn't. was me explaining my earlier post to go along with that to show that you didnt need to say no again.</quote>So, you deny asking for a 'no', after I said 'no', after which you said 'If the answer was no, you can say no...'? You: 'If the answer was no, you can say no...' Me BEFORE that: 'No.' </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LinkPizza 11/03/20 10:21:43 AM #101:	Tha_Man_DS posted... So, you deny asking for a 'no', after I said 'no', after which you said 'If the answer was no, you can say no...'? Yeah. I sent that. Tha_Man_DS posted... You: If the answer was no, you can say no... Me BEFORE that: No. Actually, you said, No. Don't put words in my mouth. Biden's incompetence will start a civil war. And I said, It's not putting words in your mouth. It's called asking a question. Hence the question mark... Anyway, I also think you're wrong. The you replied, It's an assumption, with an ? at the end. And you can think whatever you want. :) And my reply was, And it makes it a question. If the answer was no, you can say no... So, let post all that since you only posted a partial part of two quotes, and forgot two in between that are there for context. So, lets first get that correct. Because you make it sound like those were the full post, and that they were one after the others, which is false on both accounts... And Ibe already explained to you that I wasnt saying you had to say no. I even said maybe I should have said, And it makes it a question. If the answer was no, you couldve just say no... instead. If you want keep pretending to be dense, go ahead. But Ive explained that I wasnt asking for you to say no. I said all you had to say was no without all the extra stuff. Which Ive explained already. I think multiple times, too... --- Official King of Kings Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around. <cite>LinkPizza posted [p:946654859] in Will the U... [t:79073335]...</cite> <quote>Tha_Man_DS posted...</cite> <quote>So, you deny asking for a 'no', after I said 'no', after which you said 'If the answer was no, you can say no...'?</quote> Yeah. I sent that. Tha_Man_DS posted...</cite> <quote>You: If the answer was no, you can say no... Me BEFORE that: No.</quote> Actually, you said, No. Don't put words in my mouth. Biden's incompetence will start a civil war. And I said, It's not putting words in your mouth. It's called asking a question. Hence the question mark... Anyway, I also think you're wrong. The you replied, It's an assumption, with an ? at the end. And you can think whatever you want. :) And my reply was, And it makes it a question. If the answer was no, you can say no... So, let post all that since you only posted a partial part of two quotes, and forgot two in between that are there for context. So, lets first get that correct. Because you make it sound like those were the full post, and that they were one after the others, which is false on both accounts... And Ibe already explained to you that I wasnt saying you had to say no. I even said maybe I should have said, And it makes it a question. If the answer was no, you couldve just say no... instead. If you want keep pretending to be dense, go ahead. But Ive explained that I wasnt asking for you to say no. I said all you had to say was no without all the extra stuff. Which Ive explained already. I think multiple times, too...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Johnny Eagle 11/03/20 10:22:30 AM #102:	Tha_Man_DS posted... So, you deny asking for a 'no', after I said 'no', after which you said 'If the answer was no, you can say no...'? You: 'If the answer was no, you can say no...' Me BEFORE that: 'No.' .......would the 2 of you just give it a rest already? --- "Life's a game. It's meant to be played." "Amateurs built the Ark. Professionals built the Titanic." <cite>Johnny Eagle posted [p:946654897] in Will the U... [t:79073335]...</cite> <quote>Tha_Man_DS posted... </cite> <quote>So, you deny asking for a 'no', after I said 'no', after which you said 'If the answer was no, you can say no...'? You: 'If the answer was no, you can say no...' Me BEFORE that: 'No.'</quote> .......would the 2 of you just give it a rest already? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tha_Man_DS 11/03/20 10:34:28 AM #103:	LinkPizza posted... Actually, you said, No. Don't put words in my mouth. Biden's incompetence will start a civil war. And I said, It's not putting words in your mouth. It's called asking a question. Hence the question mark... Anyway, I also think you're wrong. The you replied, It's an assumption, with an ? at the end. And you can think whatever you want. :) And my reply was, And it makes it a question. If the answer was no, you can say no... As you can see (bold parts) I already said 'No.' The 'just' part you didn't add, isn't -in this case- a 'could have', but a 'should have', 'cause as it is now, it doesn't make sense. --- It's dangerous to go alone! Take this. Switch FC: SW-3553-2450-1242 <cite>Tha_Man_DS posted [p:946655260] in Will the U... [t:79073335]...</cite> <quote>LinkPizza posted... </cite> <quote>Actually, you said, No. Don't put words in my mouth. Biden's incompetence will start a civil war. And I said, It's not putting words in your mouth. It's called asking a question. Hence the question mark... Anyway, I also think you're wrong. The you replied, It's an assumption, with an ? at the end. And you can think whatever you want. :) And my reply was, And it makes it a question. If the answer was no, you can say no...</quote> As you can see (bold parts) I already said 'No.' The 'just' part you didn't add, isn't -in this case- a 'could have', but a 'should have', 'cause as it is now, it doesn't make sense. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3

Poll of the Day > Will the USA have a Civil War Soon? (+) Yeah! (+)

Poll of the Day > Will the USA have a Civil War Soon?