Easy. It was to the first part of the post. I'll help you out though... After the first quote, pay attention to the bolded parts.
You said, "You'd literally asked for a 'no' AFTER I already "gave" it to you. Talking about 'shit', huh? :)"
I respoded, "No I didnt. I was saying that thats all you had to say. You couldve said no without adding all the put words in my mouth stuff..."
You then said, "Yes, you did. I said 'No' and you said: 'If the answer was no, you can say no...' AFTERWARDS. ;) And yeah... Could've. I say whatever I want to say, not what you want me to say. Freedom of speech (or in this case: typing), that is."
And lastly, I said, "Nope. My first response was about how I wasn't putting words in your mouth. And my second was was saying that is was a question and saying you could said no. Maybe I should've added the word just, but I thought you'd be able to understand. Guess I wrong and you didn't."
So, to explain, my nope was to the first part, which basically me saying no to asking you to say "no" after you had already said it. That's why it was the first part of the sentence. Because I was replying to your first part. I already know you said no. You didn't have to say it again. All you had to do was read the post before to see that...
To be clear: You're 'Nope' was a direct response to my sentence: 'I said 'No' and you said: 'If the answer was no, you can say no...' AFTERWARDS.'?
---
It's dangerous to go alone! Take this. Switch FC: SW-3553-2450-1242