Current Events > Have humans really been around for 200,000 years?

Topic List	Page List: 1
saspa 08/31/20 12:34:17 PM #1:	https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human Seems unreal. I only have the word of scientists and their written documents I haven't read to go on that humans have been around so long. Who knows what really happened. --- https://imgur.com/0UFI0T9 <cite>saspa posted [p:944039614] in Have human... [t:78944930]...</cite> <quote>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human Seems unreal. I only have the word of scientists and their written documents I haven't read to go on that humans have been around so long. Who knows what really happened.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MacadamianNut3 08/31/20 12:36:15 PM #2:	--- Roll Tide & Go Irish <cite>MacadamianNut3 posted [p:944039680] in Have human... [t:78944930]...</cite> <quote> </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#3	Post #3 was unavailable or deleted.
monkmith 08/31/20 12:37:08 PM #4:	fossil records suggest so, but like all fields of science there's no definite proof. but unless you've got a time machine you've got no way to find out for sure, so the best source we have is those fossil records. --- Taarsidath-an halsaam. Quando il gioco e finito, il re e il pedone vanno nella stessa scatola <cite>monkmith posted [p:944039719] in Have human... [t:78944930]...</cite> <quote>fossil records suggest so, but like all fields of science there's no definite proof. but unless you've got a time machine you've got no way to find out for sure, so the best source we have is those fossil records. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Bananana 08/31/20 12:38:02 PM #5:	monkmith posted... fossil records suggest so, but like all fields of science there's no definite proof. but unless you've got a time machine you've got no way to find out for sure, so the best source we have is those fossil records. are the fossil records...not proof? --- http://error1355.com/ce/Bananana.html <cite>Bananana posted [p:944039750] in Have human... [t:78944930]...</cite> <quote>monkmith posted... </cite> <quote>fossil records suggest so, but like all fields of science there's no definite proof. but unless you've got a time machine you've got no way to find out for sure, so the best source we have is those fossil records.</quote>are the fossil records...not proof? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Alteres 08/31/20 12:40:06 PM #6:	Last thing I saw at the end of last year was some fossil evidence of modern humans 350k years ago, that really blows your mind. Just think about how much of history is completely lost. --- ........the ghost in the machine... IGN: Fox, FC: 5344-2646-0982 <cite>Alteres posted [p:944039817] in Have human... [t:78944930]...</cite> <quote>Last thing I saw at the end of last year was some fossil evidence of modern humans 350k years ago, that really blows your mind. Just think about how much of history is completely lost. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Medussa 08/31/20 12:42:09 PM #7:	Bananana posted... are the fossil records...not proof? no. it's evidence. they tell a story, we just can't be sure it's the whole story. --- Boom! That's right, this is all happening! You cannot change the channel now! fluffy-butt fluffy-butt oh fluffy fluffy fluffy fluffy-butt pop bum-bum-bum-bum <cite>Medussa posted [p:944039885] in Have human... [t:78944930]...</cite> <quote>Bananana posted... </cite> <quote>are the fossil records...not proof?</quote> no. it's evidence. they tell a story, we just can't be sure it's the whole story. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
monkmith 08/31/20 12:47:13 PM #8:	Medussa posted... no. it's evidence. they tell a story, we just can't be sure it's the whole story. this. could be that fossils before the oldest we've discovered are still out there or were destroyed. could be that some geological activity we dont quite understand shifted the ones we've found around and we've ended up dating them wrong. hell there's the slim chance we're fucking up radiometric testing with samples that old and we could be completely wrong with how old they are. --- Taarsidath-an halsaam. Quando il gioco e finito, il re e il pedone vanno nella stessa scatola <cite>monkmith posted [p:944040057] in Have human... [t:78944930]...</cite> <quote>Medussa posted... </cite> <quote>no. it's evidence. they tell a story, we just can't be sure it's the whole story.</quote>this. could be that fossils before the oldest we've discovered are still out there or were destroyed. could be that some geological activity we dont quite understand shifted the ones we've found around and we've ended up dating them wrong. hell there's the slim chance we're fucking up radiometric testing with samples that old and we could be completely wrong with how old they are. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DP3 08/31/20 12:48:57 PM #9:	I thought the estimate was that the genome for modern humans is around 3 million years old? <cite>DP3 posted [p:944040113] in Have human... [t:78944930]...</cite> <quote>I thought the estimate was that the genome for modern humans is around 3 million years old? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Xenozoa425 08/31/20 12:50:54 PM #10:	There's an ancient city in south Africa said to be around 200,000 years old. --- "Your flesh is a relic; a mere vessel. Hand over your flesh, and a new world awaits you. We demand it." - 01 Machine Ambassador <cite>Xenozoa425 posted [p:944040174] in Have human... [t:78944930]...</cite> <quote>There's an ancient city in south Africa said to be around 200,000 years old. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Bananana 08/31/20 1:05:42 PM #11:	Medussa posted... no. it's evidence. they tell a story, we just can't be sure it's the whole story. Its a piece of the story, sure, but its proof that humans did at least exist x amount of time ago, if not more so --- http://error1355.com/ce/Bananana.html <cite>Bananana posted [p:944040671] in Have human... [t:78944930]...</cite> <quote>Medussa posted... </cite> <quote>no. it's evidence. they tell a story, we just can't be sure it's the whole story.</quote>Its a piece of the story, sure, but its proof that humans did at least exist x amount of time ago, if not more so </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Returning_CEmen 08/31/20 1:10:26 PM #12:	DP3 posted... I thought the estimate was that the genome for modern humans is around 3 million years old? No way, 200,000 years even seems a bit of a stretch. I thought it was closer to 100,000 years. <cite>Returning_CEmen posted [p:944040836] in Have human... [t:78944930]...</cite> <quote>DP3 posted... </cite> <quote>I thought the estimate was that the genome for modern humans is around 3 million years old?</quote>No way, 200,000 years even seems a bit of a stretch. I thought it was closer to 100,000 years. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Crescente 08/31/20 1:10:55 PM #13:	I'm more interested in the Neanderthals and Denisovans. How did they die off? What were they like? Also, they kind of looked like Tolkien Dwarves. Which means...dragons might have existed! <cite>Crescente posted [p:944040852] in Have human... [t:78944930]...</cite> <quote>I'm more interested in the Neanderthals and Denisovans. How did they die off? What were they like? Also, they kind of looked like Tolkien Dwarves. Which means...dragons might have existed! </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
saspa 08/31/20 2:07:14 PM #14:	monkmith posted... this. could be that fossils before the oldest we've discovered are still out there or were destroyed. could be that some geological activity we dont quite understand shifted the ones we've found around and we've ended up dating them wrong. hell there's the slim chance we're fucking up radiometric testing with samples that old and we could be completely wrong with how old they are. Hasn't all the nuclear radiation and nuclear weapons of humanity completely ruined carbon dating and radiometric testing, throwing it off by like, several thousand years? --- https://imgur.com/0UFI0T9 <cite>saspa posted [p:944043026] in Have human... [t:78944930]...</cite> <quote>monkmith posted...</cite> <quote> this. could be that fossils before the oldest we've discovered are still out there or were destroyed. could be that some geological activity we dont quite understand shifted the ones we've found around and we've ended up dating them wrong. hell there's the slim chance we're fucking up radiometric testing with samples that old and we could be completely wrong with how old they are. </quote> Hasn't all the nuclear radiation and nuclear weapons of humanity completely ruined carbon dating and radiometric testing, throwing it off by like, several thousand years?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DP3 08/31/20 2:53:29 PM #15:	Returning_CEmen posted... No way, 200,000 years even seems a bit of a stretch. I thought it was closer to 100,000 years. That's only when humans developed what we can call advanced culture. Stuff like cave paintings etc. That doesn't mean humans weren't around much longer, just without the sophistication of culture. <cite>DP3 posted [p:944044647] in Have human... [t:78944930]...</cite> <quote>Returning_CEmen posted... </cite> <quote>No way, 200,000 years even seems a bit of a stretch. I thought it was closer to 100,000 years.</quote>That's only when humans developed what we can call advanced culture. Stuff like cave paintings etc. That doesn't mean humans weren't around much longer, just without the sophistication of culture. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
AssGender 08/31/20 2:56:24 PM #16:	monkmith posted... fossil records suggest so, but like all fields of science there's no definite proof. but unless you've got a time machine you've got no way to find out for sure, so the best source we have is those fossil records. Fossil are not real, its just a scultures made by ancient civilazation at that time --- Ecce homo qui est faba.Ecce homo qui est faba. Vale homo qui est faba, qui est faba, qui est faba <cite>AssGender posted [p:944044761] in Have human... [t:78944930]...</cite> <quote>monkmith posted... </cite> <quote>fossil records suggest so, but like all fields of science there's no definite proof. but unless you've got a time machine you've got no way to find out for sure, so the best source we have is those fossil records.</quote>Fossil are not real, its just a scultures made by ancient civilazation at that time </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Lost_All_Senses 08/31/20 2:57:38 PM #17:	Only thing I know for sure is that people been around for at least 30 years --- Name checks out "Try to talk and they ain't listening, but they'll point it out when you get ignorant" - Dreezy <cite>Lost_All_Senses posted [p:944044806] in Have human... [t:78944930]...</cite> <quote>Only thing I know for sure is that people been around for at least 30 years </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Blue_Target 08/31/20 2:59:06 PM #18:	Yes. We'll be living on Mars though. --- https://imgur.com/JXxiPHm https://imgur.com/JXxiPHm <cite>Blue_Target posted [p:944044860] in Have human... [t:78944930]...</cite> <quote>Yes. We'll be living on Mars though. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
K181 08/31/20 3:00:26 PM #19:	Depends on your definition of human. By anatomically modern Homo sapiens, yeah that's about right. If you include the entire Homo genus, humanity has been around for about two million years, with the understanding that there have been multiple human species. --- Irregardless, for all intensive purposes, I could care less. <cite>K181 posted [p:944044907] in Have human... [t:78944930]...</cite> <quote>Depends on your definition of human. By anatomically modern Homo sapiens, yeah that's about right. If you include the entire Homo genus, humanity has been around for about two million years, with the understanding that there have been multiple human species. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Laserion 08/31/20 3:03:45 PM #20:	Lost_All_Senses posted... Only thing I know for sure is that people been around for at least 30 years Everything else are just made-up backstory for your 30-year-old world? But even then, you could have been made yesterday, with implanted memories of the last 30 years. --- There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of". There is "would've", "should've" and "could've". <cite>Laserion posted [p:944045020] in Have human... [t:78944930]...</cite> <quote>Lost_All_Senses posted...</cite> <quote>Only thing I know for sure is that people been around for at least 30 years </quote> Everything else are just made-up backstory for your 30-year-old world? But even then, you could have been made yesterday, with implanted memories of the last 30 years.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
saspa 09/02/20 12:38:53 AM #21:	Xenozoa425 posted... There's an ancient city in south Africa said to be around 200,000 years old. It's insane that we can just accurately assume a figure that large when you think about it, and for it to have human DNA traces --- https://imgur.com/0UFI0T9 <cite>saspa posted [p:944104440] in Have human... [t:78944930]...</cite> <quote>Xenozoa425 posted...</cite> <quote>There's an ancient city in south Africa said to be around 200,000 years old. </quote> It's insane that we can just accurately assume a figure that large when you think about it, and for it to have human DNA traces</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheGreatGeno6 09/02/20 12:40:24 AM #22:	It's crazy to think that since writing only existed for around 5000 years, that over 97% of human history is lost. --- Formerly known as Genocet_10-325 Conservatism is a plague on society. Vote Blue No Matter Who <cite>TheGreatGeno6 posted [p:944104472] in Have human... [t:78944930]...</cite> <quote>It's crazy to think that since writing only existed for around 5000 years, that over 97% of human history is lost. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zikten 09/02/20 12:41:59 AM #23:	TheGreatGeno6 posted... It's crazy to think that since writing only existed for around 5000 years, that over 97% of human history is lost. yea. I've seen it said somewhere that "humanity is a species with amnesia". most of our history is lost to the mists of time. and we can only guess at what happened. <cite>Zikten posted [p:944104511] in Have human... [t:78944930]...</cite> <quote>TheGreatGeno6 posted...</cite> <quote>It's crazy to think that since writing only existed for around 5000 years, that over 97% of human history is lost. </quote> yea. I've seen it said somewhere that "humanity is a species with amnesia". most of our history is lost to the mists of time. and we can only guess at what happened.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tyranthraxus 09/02/20 12:44:45 AM #24:	Returning_CEmen posted... No way, 200,000 years even seems a bit of a stretch. I thought it was closer to 100,000 years. Homo Habilis was over a million years ago. If anything it more unbelievable that we haven't found anything even earlier. --- It says right here in Matthew 16:4 "Jesus doth not need a giant Mecha." https://imgur.com/dQgC4kv <cite>Tyranthraxus posted [p:944104561] in Have human... [t:78944930]...</cite> <quote>Returning_CEmen posted... </cite> <quote>No way, 200,000 years even seems a bit of a stretch. I thought it was closer to 100,000 years.</quote> Homo Habilis was over a million years ago. If anything it more unbelievable that we haven't found anything even earlier. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
modena 09/02/20 12:49:22 AM #25:	Zikten posted... yea. I've seen it said somewhere that "humanity is a species with amnesia". most of our history is lost to the mists of time. and we can only guess at what happened. Well we have global catastrophes that date to certain periods that could of burned our paint off the walls and burnt the skins. Your right though,look at the 3D lazer graphs their finding in South America of old civilizations lost to time. Wasnt there a "cavemen" female found in South America dated back to like 120,000-200,000 years in the past several years? --- I'm surrounded <cite>modena posted [p:944104676] in Have human... [t:78944930]...</cite> <quote>Zikten posted... </cite> <quote>yea. I've seen it said somewhere that "humanity is a species with amnesia". most of our history is lost to the mists of time. and we can only guess at what happened.</quote>Well we have global catastrophes that date to certain periods that could of burned our paint off the walls and burnt the skins. Your right though,look at the 3D lazer graphs their finding in South America of old civilizations lost to time. Wasnt there a "cavemen" female found in South America dated back to like 120,000-200,000 years in the past several years? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TreyFlowers 09/02/20 12:49:30 AM #26:	TheGreatGeno6 posted... It's crazy to think that since writing only existed for around 5000 years, that over 97% of human history is lost. That makes me sad --- ...for it is better to be alone than in bad company. <cite>TreyFlowers posted [p:944104682] in Have human... [t:78944930]...</cite> <quote>TheGreatGeno6 posted... </cite> <quote>It's crazy to think that since writing only existed for around 5000 years, that over 97% of human history is lost.</quote> That makes me sad </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
008Zulu 09/02/20 1:12:13 AM #27:	Crescente posted... I'm more interested in the Neanderthals and Denisovans. How did they die off? Competition from other branches of evolution seems to be the most widely accepted cause. --- If you protest, it's because you feel your voice isn't being heard. If you riot, it's because you feel your voice is being ignored. <cite>008Zulu posted [p:944105167] in Have human... [t:78944930]...</cite> <quote>Crescente posted... </cite> <quote>I'm more interested in the Neanderthals and Denisovans. How did they die off? </quote>Competition from other branches of evolution seems to be the most widely accepted cause. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Medussa 09/02/20 1:14:45 AM #28:	008Zulu posted... Competition from other branches of evolution seems to be the most widely accepted cause. or cooperation. sexy cooperation. --- Boom! That's right, this is all happening! You cannot change the channel now! fluffy-butt fluffy-butt oh fluffy fluffy fluffy fluffy-butt pop bum-bum-bum-bum <cite>Medussa posted [p:944105231] in Have human... [t:78944930]...</cite> <quote>008Zulu posted... </cite> <quote>Competition from other branches of evolution seems to be the most widely accepted cause.</quote> or cooperation. sexy cooperation. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Xenozoa425 09/02/20 2:23:29 AM #29:	saspa posted... It's insane that we can just accurately assume a figure that large when you think about it, and for it to have human DNA traces Not only that, but they have found traces of history in Egypt older than what we originally thought, by around 100,000 years. And there's also evidence that suggests some of those humans are the descendants of extraterrestrials, such as elongated skulls and depictions of giants/craft in the hieroglyphics. The ancient civilizations (Egypt/Sumer/Babylonian/etc) called the Anunnaki their ancestors, or those from the "heavens". Most stuff sounds outlandish or silly, but either way you look at it, it's all extremely fascinating to learn about imo. --- "Your flesh is a relic; a mere vessel. Hand over your flesh, and a new world awaits you. We demand it." - 01 Machine Ambassador <cite>Xenozoa425 posted [p:944106382] in Have human... [t:78944930]...</cite> <quote>saspa posted... </cite> <quote>It's insane that we can just accurately assume a figure that large when you think about it, and for it to have human DNA traces</quote>Not only that, but they have found traces of history in Egypt older than what we originally thought, by around 100,000 years. And there's also evidence that suggests some of those humans are the descendants of extraterrestrials, such as elongated skulls and depictions of giants/craft in the hieroglyphics. The ancient civilizations (Egypt/Sumer/Babylonian/etc) called the Anunnaki their ancestors, or those from the "heavens". Most stuff sounds outlandish or silly, but either way you look at it, it's all extremely fascinating to learn about imo. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tyranthraxus 09/02/20 2:48:31 AM #30:	Medussa posted... or cooperation. sexy cooperation. This is most likely IMO. Humans today are the evolutionary result of DNA mixing between Homo Erectus, Homo Neanderthalensis, and Homo Denisova --- It says right here in Matthew 16:4 "Jesus doth not need a giant Mecha." https://imgur.com/dQgC4kv <cite>Tyranthraxus posted [p:944106712] in Have human... [t:78944930]...</cite> <quote>Medussa posted... </cite> <quote>or cooperation. sexy cooperation.</quote> This is most likely IMO. Humans today are the evolutionary result of DNA mixing between Homo Erectus, Homo Neanderthalensis, and Homo Denisova </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hockeybub89 09/02/20 2:55:18 AM #31:	Alteres posted... Last thing I saw at the end of last year was some fossil evidence of modern humans 350k years ago, that really blows your mind. Just think about how much of history is completely lost. It likely wasn't very interesting. Just a bunch of hairless apes hunting and fucking. --- http://card.psnprofiles.com/1/NIR_Hockey.png http://www.last.fm/user/hockeybub89/ <cite>hockeybub89 posted [p:944106804] in Have human... [t:78944930]...</cite> <quote>Alteres posted... </cite> <quote>Last thing I saw at the end of last year was some fossil evidence of modern humans 350k years ago, that really blows your mind. Just think about how much of history is completely lost.</quote>It likely wasn't very interesting. Just a bunch of hairless apes hunting and fucking. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
nativengine 09/02/20 3:06:49 AM #32:	Medussa posted... no. it's evidence. they tell a story, we just can't be sure it's the whole story. Definition of evidence is proof --- Jive Turkey <cite>nativengine posted [p:944106917] in Have human... [t:78944930]...</cite> <quote>Medussa posted... </cite> <quote>no. it's evidence. they tell a story, we just can't be sure it's the whole story.</quote>Definition of evidence is proof </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
action52 09/02/20 3:15:00 AM #33:	Tyranthraxus posted... This is most likely IMO. Humans today are the evolutionary result of DNA mixing between Homo Erectus, Homo Neanderthalensis, and Homo Denisova Just imagine all those homos having sex with each other! Pretty hot if you ask me. --- When I was a boy and I saw scary things in the news, my mother would say to me: Look for the helpers. You will always find people who are helping. -Fred Rogers <cite>action52 posted [p:944107019] in Have human... [t:78944930]...</cite> <quote>Tyranthraxus posted... </cite> <quote>This is most likely IMO. Humans today are the evolutionary result of DNA mixing between Homo Erectus, Homo Neanderthalensis, and Homo Denisova</quote>Just imagine all those homos having sex with each other! Pretty hot if you ask me. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DrizztLink 09/02/20 3:38:54 AM #34:	Tyranthraxus posted... This is most likely IMO. Humans today are the evolutionary result of DNA mixing between Homo Erectus, Homo Neanderthalensis, and Homo Denisova Yeah baby, making modern humans using that Homo Denis system --- http://guidesmedia.ign.com/guides/9846/images/slowpoke.gif https://imgur.com/M8h2ATe https://imgur.com/6ezFwG1 <cite>DrizztLink posted [p:944107325] in Have human... [t:78944930]...</cite> <quote>Tyranthraxus posted... </cite> <quote>This is most likely IMO. Humans today are the evolutionary result of DNA mixing between Homo Erectus, Homo Neanderthalensis, and Homo Denisova</quote>Yeah baby, making modern humans using that Homo Denis system </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tyranthraxus 09/02/20 10:54:25 AM #35:	hockeybub89 posted... It likely wasn't very interesting. Just a bunch of hairless apes hunting and fucking. It would still be interesting from an anthropology standpoint even if not a historical one. --- It says right here in Matthew 16:4 "Jesus doth not need a giant Mecha." https://imgur.com/dQgC4kv <cite>Tyranthraxus posted [p:944114611] in Have human... [t:78944930]...</cite> <quote>hockeybub89 posted... </cite> <quote>It likely wasn't very interesting. Just a bunch of hairless apes hunting and fucking.</quote> It would still be interesting from an anthropology standpoint even if not a historical one. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Christian RULES 09/02/20 10:57:46 AM #36:	So the stories and humans of Star Wars could have existed 300,000 years ago. That really is a long time ago --- RIP Man Fan - https://gamefaqs1.cbsistatic.com/user_image/7/3/8/AADDtPAAAbxK.jpg TRUMP 2020 - Keep America Great - Promises Made! Promises Kept! #KAG #MAGA <cite>Christian RULES posted [p:944114714] in Have human... [t:78944930]...</cite> <quote>So the stories and humans of Star Wars could have existed 300,000 years ago. That really is a long time ago </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Solid Sonic 09/02/20 10:58:08 AM #37:	We didn't deserve it. --- "It feels like I'm always wrong." "Nah, that's not true...I mean you just made that statement, didn't you?" <cite>Solid Sonic posted [p:944114727] in Have human... [t:78944930]...</cite> <quote>We didn't deserve it. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
saspa 09/04/20 6:57:55 AM #38:	Tyranthraxus posted... This is most likely IMO. Humans today are the evolutionary result of DNA mixing between Homo Erectus, Homo Neanderthalensis, and Homo Denisova All four of them though? --- https://imgur.com/0UFI0T9 <cite>saspa posted [p:944194456] in Have human... [t:78944930]...</cite> <quote>Tyranthraxus posted...</cite> <quote> This is most likely IMO. Humans today are the evolutionary result of DNA mixing between Homo Erectus, Homo Neanderthalensis, and Homo Denisova </quote> All four of them though?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Choco 09/04/20 7:00:37 AM #39:	Tyranthraxus posted... Homo Erectus that's meee --- http://error1355.com/ce/Choco.html <cite>Choco posted [p:944194490] in Have human... [t:78944930]...</cite> <quote>Tyranthraxus posted... </cite> <quote>Homo Erectus</quote>that's meee </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Smackems 09/04/20 7:02:12 AM #40:	Lol homo erectus --- Common sense is the most uncommon thing in the world-some dude. <cite>Smackems posted [p:944194508] in Have human... [t:78944930]...</cite> <quote>Lol homo erectus </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BurmesePenguin 09/04/20 7:06:32 AM #41:	Posting in creationism lite thread. <cite>BurmesePenguin posted [p:944194568] in Have human... [t:78944930]...</cite> <quote>Posting in creationism lite thread. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Turbam 09/04/20 7:07:20 AM #42:	What's really sad, is that we're the only Homos left --- ~snip (V)_(;,;)_(V) snip~ I'm just one man! Whoa! Well, I'm a one man band! https://imgur.com/p9Xvjvs <cite>Turbam posted [p:944194579] in Have human... [t:78944930]...</cite> <quote>What's really sad, is that we're the only Homos left </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Notti 09/06/20 6:59:50 AM #43:	Don't ask how long the universe has existed for.... --- https://youtube.com/TheYoungTurks Bernie>Biden>poop>Trump https://RightWingWatch.org http://reddit.com/r/BreadTube http://facebook.com/OccupyDemocrats/ <cite>Notti posted [p:944272488] in Have human... [t:78944930]...</cite> <quote>Don't ask how long the universe has existed for....</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
AlisLandale 09/06/20 7:05:13 AM #44:	Humans have been around for less than ten years. Were a simulation and our memories are implanted. --- #1 Kaiju Fangirl ^_^ https://imgur.com/mptS9Qj <cite>AlisLandale posted [p:944272546] in Have human... [t:78944930]...</cite> <quote>Humans have been around for less than ten years. Were a simulation and our memories are implanted. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1

Current Events > Have humans really been around for 200,000 years? (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Have humans really been around for 200,000 years?