Poll of the Day > I forgot to get the official excuse for the Senate finding collusion.

(+) Yeah! (+)

So Trump defense squad, what's the excuse this time?

Choose your own source:
rb.gy/bhxlr9
---

Theyre just ignoring it and the fact that people like Rubio say one thing in the official report and then make statements saying that its all a lie

theyre nothing more than a party of blatantly transparent bullshit for the sake of holding onto power. Its why the RNC convention chose to not select any platform for 2020, they literally dont stand for anything

---

"it's too late in Trump's term to punish him for this, dems are sore losers, also they would have colluded if given the chance"

---

Mead posted...

Theyre just ignoring it

Zeuses favorite tactic here when called out.

---

FrndNhbrHdCEman posted...

Zeuses favorite tactic here when called out.

Nah, his favorite tactic is to bail out of the topic until it's been a week since it got any posts. Then he posts some weak deflection in a limp attempt to get the last word.
---

Bump

@OhhhJa @Zeus
---

It never happened if you ignore it.

---

FrndNhbrHdCEman posted...

Zeuses favorite tactic here when called out.

Nah, his favorite tactic when called out is to wildly throw out spurious accusations without even attempting to back them up and "counter" the argument with whataboutism.

"Like the special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, who released his findings in April 2019, the Senate report did not conclude that the Trump campaign engaged in a coordinated conspiracy with the Russian government "

Though there was no evidence of any agreement between the Russians and the Trump campaign to work together, there was clear coordination, said Senator Angus King, a Maine independent who caucuses with the Democrats and is a member of the Intelligence Committee.
The Russians were doing things to disrupt American democracy and help the Trump campaign and the Trump campaign was doing things to amplify and utilize what the Russians were supplying, Mr. King said in an interview. There may not have been an explicit agreement but they were both consciously pursing the same end

From the ny times article but its a Google amp link and I know how people are about those. Sounds like a whole lot of spin more than new concrete info tbh. I won't deny that maybe some russian agents could've worked to help the trump campaign but I still maintain the position that trump has more ties to Mossad than anything, much like epstein and his network of folks

I'm not interested in the political theatre of this Russia investigation though and it's gotten pretty old

I think we should also discuss biden's open, passionate support of China though as well. I dont think candidates receiving help from domestic and foreign agents is something exclusive to trump either

Let not discuss Trump's business ties to China though you only get one treason accusation per turn

---

Blightzkrieg posted...

Let not discuss Trump's business ties to China though you only get one treason accusation per turn

Who do I trust more? A guy that wages a trade war against his own business interests or a guy who openly supports a totalitarian, murderous, oppressive regime because reasons

Well, neither really...