Current Events > AOC snubs Biden in speech instead endorses Bernie Sanders for President

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
CommonStar 08/19/20 3:34:48 PM #152:	Antifar posted... Only semi-related, but maybe something to change the tenor of the topic https://twitter.com/LindseyGrahamSC/status/1295899361080217602 Lol, If only that were the case. I wish the Democrats were as left as the Republicans make them out to be. <cite>CommonStar posted [p:943577306] in AOC snubs ... [t:78920844]...</cite> <quote>Antifar posted... </cite> <quote>Only semi-related, but maybe something to change the tenor of the topic https://twitter.com/LindseyGrahamSC/status/1295899361080217602 Lol,</quote>If only that were the case. I wish the Democrats were as left as the Republicans make them out to be. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
GoodOlJr 08/19/20 3:35:06 PM #153:	I respect it, biden is lame --- http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3475/3291766630_b434e97925.jpg 3DS: 1005-8921-6109 <cite>GoodOlJr posted [p:943577319] in AOC snubs ... [t:78920844]...</cite> <quote>I respect it, biden is lame</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
harley2280 08/19/20 3:35:56 PM #154:	CommonStar posted... Antifar posted... Only semi-related, but maybe something to change the tenor of the topic https://twitter.com/LindseyGrahamSC/status/1295899361080217602 Lol, If only that were the case. I wish the Democrats were as left as the Republicans make them out to be. It's not surprise Lindsey doesn't know how conventions work. He doesn't understand democracy to begin with. --- Posted with GameRaven 3.5.2 <cite>harley2280 posted [p:943577341] in AOC snubs ... [t:78920844]...</cite> <quote>CommonStar posted...</cite> <quote>Antifar posted... </cite> <quote> Only semi-related, but maybe something to change the tenor of the topic https://twitter.com/LindseyGrahamSC/status/1295899361080217602 Lol,</quote>If only that were the case. I wish the Democrats were as left as the Republicans make them out to be.</quote> It's not surprise Lindsey doesn't know how conventions work. He doesn't understand democracy to begin with.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CommonStar 08/19/20 3:37:44 PM #155:	harley2280 posted... It's not surprise Lindsey doesn't know how conventions work. He doesn't understand democracy to begin with. They know how things work. It just doesn't matter when the point is to cater to their base. <cite>CommonStar posted [p:943577393] in AOC snubs ... [t:78920844]...</cite> <quote>harley2280 posted... </cite> <quote>It's not surprise Lindsey doesn't know how conventions work. He doesn't understand democracy to begin with.</quote>They know how things work. It just doesn't matter when the point is to cater to their base. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CommonJoe 08/19/20 3:45:59 PM #156:	ITT: I make a post making point A. Second poster raises point B, so I raise point C asking for proof. I get said proof, admit I was wrong on Point C, and reiterate Point A as that had not yet been addressed. Second poster and others start circlejerking and pretending my whole argument got proven wrong when Point C was never part of my original argument. And now here comes more obtuse circlejerking. --- I dream of a society where I would be guillotined as a conservative. https://youtu.be/NkRkuI0ZgX0 <cite>CommonJoe posted [p:943577678] in AOC snubs ... [t:78920844]...</cite> <quote>ITT: I make a post making point A. Second poster raises point B, so I raise point C asking for proof. I get said proof, admit I was wrong on Point C, and reiterate Point A as that had not yet been addressed. Second poster and others start circlejerking and pretending my whole argument got proven wrong when Point C was never part of my original argument. And now here comes more obtuse circlejerking. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
harley2280 08/19/20 3:54:56 PM #157:	CommonJoe posted... ITT: I make a post making point A. Second poster raises point B, so I raise point C asking for proof. I get said proof, admit I was wrong on Point C, and reiterate Point A as that had not yet been addressed. Second poster and others start circlejerking and pretending my whole argument got proven wrong when Point C was never part of my original argument. And now here comes more obtuse circlejerking. You do know it's okay to admit you didn't know how it works right? --- Posted with GameRaven 3.5.2 <cite>harley2280 posted [p:943577996] in AOC snubs ... [t:78920844]...</cite> <quote>CommonJoe posted...</cite> <quote>ITT: I make a post making point A. Second poster raises point B, so I raise point C asking for proof. I get said proof, admit I was wrong on Point C, and reiterate Point A as that had not yet been addressed. Second poster and others start circlejerking and pretending my whole argument got proven wrong when Point C was never part of my original argument. And now here comes more obtuse circlejerking. </quote> You do know it's okay to admit you didn't know how it works right?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CommonJoe 08/19/20 4:01:36 PM #158:	harley2280 posted... You do know it's okay to admit you didn't know how it works right? Except I did know how it works; what I didnt know is that was what AOC was doing, and neither did anyone else. At this point this is just blatant gaslighting. Knock it off, address my post, or fuck off. --- I dream of a society where I would be guillotined as a conservative. https://youtu.be/NkRkuI0ZgX0 <cite>CommonJoe posted [p:943578207] in AOC snubs ... [t:78920844]...</cite> <quote>harley2280 posted... </cite> <quote>You do know it's okay to admit you didn't know how it works right?</quote> Except I did know how it works; what I didnt know is that was what AOC was doing, and neither did anyone else. At this point this is just blatant gaslighting. Knock it off, address my post, or fuck off. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#159	Post #159 was unavailable or deleted.
SmidgeIsntBack 08/19/20 4:03:48 PM #160:	Antifar posted... Only semi-related, but maybe something to change the tenor of the topic https://twitter.com/LindseyGrahamSC/status/1295899361080217602 Lol, Not 20 minutes after the White House attacking from the left, lol. --- Podcast and Audiobook Board https://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/1364- View my ASCII art and others' at https://gfascii.art/ <cite>SmidgeIsntBack posted [p:943578294] in AOC snubs ... [t:78920844]...</cite> <quote>Antifar posted... </cite> <quote>Only semi-related, but maybe something to change the tenor of the topic https://twitter.com/LindseyGrahamSC/status/1295899361080217602 Lol,</quote> Not 20 minutes after the White House attacking from the left, lol. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
NeonOctopus 08/19/20 4:03:51 PM #161:	lol --- https://imgur.com/7nfPhE2 <cite>NeonOctopus posted [p:943578297] in AOC snubs ... [t:78920844]...</cite> <quote>lol </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tyranthraxus 08/19/20 4:06:08 PM #162:	CommonJoe posted... Lie of omission. Literally everyone thought she was getting an actual slot at the convention, and due to general ignorance and NBC being complicit fuckwads they just handed her future opponents an easy smear. If it was said from the beginning she was selected to nominate Sanders all of this would have been handled already and the controversy wouldn't have even happened. But they didnt want to let the left know she wasnt getting a real slot to speak, making the lefts issue with Kasich getting a slot even more poignant because she literally did get snubbed. If it wasn't for Sanders she wouldnt have spoke. The post of someone who "already knew how it works" --- It says right here in Matthew 16:4 "Jesus doth not need a giant Mecha." https://imgur.com/dQgC4kv <cite>Tyranthraxus posted [p:943578383] in AOC snubs ... [t:78920844]...</cite> <quote>CommonJoe posted... </cite> <quote>Lie of omission. Literally everyone thought she was getting an actual slot at the convention, and due to general ignorance and NBC being complicit fuckwads they just handed her future opponents an easy smear. If it was said from the beginning she was selected to nominate Sanders all of this would have been handled already and the controversy wouldn't have even happened. But they didnt want to let the left know she wasnt getting a real slot to speak, making the lefts issue with Kasich getting a slot even more poignant because she literally did get snubbed. If it wasn't for Sanders she wouldnt have spoke.</quote> The post of someone who "already knew how it works" </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#163	Post #163 was unavailable or deleted.
CommonJoe 08/19/20 4:11:05 PM #164:	Tyranthraxus posted... The post of someone who "already knew how it works" ITT: Assuming, like everyone else, that X was going to occur is equivalent to not understanding how Y works. Do you gaslighting trolls understand the problem now or are you going to just double down? --- I dream of a society where I would be guillotined as a conservative. https://youtu.be/NkRkuI0ZgX0 <cite>CommonJoe posted [p:943578565] in AOC snubs ... [t:78920844]...</cite> <quote>Tyranthraxus posted... </cite> <quote>The post of someone who "already knew how it works"</quote> ITT: Assuming, like everyone else, that X was going to occur is equivalent to not understanding how Y works. Do you gaslighting trolls understand the problem now or are you going to just double down? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
COVxy 08/19/20 4:14:01 PM #165:	How is commonjoe still going on? Jfc. I'd stop responding at this point. --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] <cite>COVxy posted [p:943578683] in AOC snubs ... [t:78920844]...</cite> <quote>How is commonjoe still going on? Jfc. I'd stop responding at this point. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tyranthraxus 08/19/20 4:14:30 PM #166:	Brief summary of this topic for latecomers https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rQo71PpuDoM --- It says right here in Matthew 16:4 "Jesus doth not need a giant Mecha." https://imgur.com/dQgC4kv <cite>Tyranthraxus posted [p:943578699] in AOC snubs ... [t:78920844]...</cite> <quote> Brief summary of this topic for latecomers https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rQo71PpuDoM </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CommonJoe 08/19/20 4:15:45 PM #167:	COVxy posted... How is commonjoe still going on? Jfc. I'd stop responding at this point. Nah. Shitposters trying to gaslight me aren't going to win that easily. --- I dream of a society where I would be guillotined as a conservative. https://youtu.be/NkRkuI0ZgX0 <cite>CommonJoe posted [p:943578754] in AOC snubs ... [t:78920844]...</cite> <quote>COVxy posted... </cite> <quote>How is commonjoe still going on? Jfc. I'd stop responding at this point.</quote> Nah. Shitposters trying to gaslight me aren't going to win that easily. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
COVxy 08/19/20 4:17:41 PM #168:	I was referring to the people who are right, i.e. shock et al. Really everyone but you. Nobody needs to entertain you any further. --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] <cite>COVxy posted [p:943578818] in AOC snubs ... [t:78920844]...</cite> <quote>I was referring to the people who are right, i.e. shock et al. Really everyone but you. Nobody needs to entertain you any further. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#169	Post #169 was unavailable or deleted.
CommonJoe 08/19/20 4:23:52 PM #170:	They aren't right. CommonJoe posted... Lie of omission. Literally everyone thought she was getting an actual slot at the convention, and due to general ignorance and NBC being complicit fuckwads they just handed her future opponents an easy smear. If it was said from the beginning she was selected to nominate Sanders all of this would have been handled already and the controversy wouldn't have even happened. But they didnt want to let the left know she wasnt getting a real slot to speak, making the lefts issue with Kasich getting a slot even more poignant because she literally did get snubbed. If it wasn't for Sanders she wouldnt have spoke. The bolded is part of why this is even a controversy; nobody was talking about AOC speaking like it was a nomination, but like it was a regular speech like Kasich's or Jill's. And as said, to dispute that means you're either full of shit and haven't paid any attention at all to people talking about this leading up to last night or you're lying. --- I dream of a society where I would be guillotined as a conservative. https://youtu.be/NkRkuI0ZgX0 <cite>CommonJoe posted [p:943579051] in AOC snubs ... [t:78920844]...</cite> <quote>They aren't right. CommonJoe posted... </cite> <quote>Lie of omission. Literally everyone thought she was getting an actual slot at the convention, and due to general ignorance and NBC being complicit fuckwads they just handed her future opponents an easy smear. If it was said from the beginning she was selected to nominate Sanders all of this would have been handled already and the controversy wouldn't have even happened. But they didnt want to let the left know she wasnt getting a real slot to speak, making the lefts issue with Kasich getting a slot even more poignant because she literally did get snubbed. If it wasn't for Sanders she wouldnt have spoke.</quote> The bolded is part of why this is even a controversy; nobody was talking about AOC speaking like it was a nomination, but like it was a regular speech like Kasich's or Jill's. And as said, to dispute that means you're either full of shit and haven't paid any attention at all to people talking about this leading up to last night or you're lying. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DrizztLink 08/19/20 4:25:22 PM #171:	Jesus Christ, dude. --- http://guidesmedia.ign.com/guides/9846/images/slowpoke.gif https://imgur.com/M8h2ATe https://imgur.com/6ezFwG1 <cite>DrizztLink posted [p:943579102] in AOC snubs ... [t:78920844]...</cite> <quote>Jesus Christ, dude. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
__aCEr__ 08/19/20 4:26:16 PM #172:	"Those people aren't going to win that easily." starts blocking those people --- See you next Wednesday. <cite>__aCEr__ posted [p:943579131] in AOC snubs ... [t:78920844]...</cite> <quote>"Those people aren't going to win that easily." starts blocking those people </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CommonJoe 08/19/20 4:26:21 PM #173:	DrizztLink posted... Jesus Christ, dude. Participate or leave. This is a discussion board. --- I dream of a society where I would be guillotined as a conservative. https://youtu.be/NkRkuI0ZgX0 <cite>CommonJoe posted [p:943579138] in AOC snubs ... [t:78920844]...</cite> <quote>DrizztLink posted... </cite> <quote>Jesus Christ, dude.</quote> Participate or leave. This is a discussion board. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
troll_swag 08/19/20 4:27:18 PM #174:	--- This post now contains 300% more swag, and a 500% increase in trolling. You're welcome. <cite>troll_swag posted [p:943579186] in AOC snubs ... [t:78920844]...</cite> <quote> </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CommonJoe 08/19/20 4:27:28 PM #175:	__aCEr__ posted... "Those people aren't going to win that easily." starts blocking those people I see no reason to bother with someone whose insulting me. Particularly when I dont need to be suspended again for saying things similar to what Id really like to say to you people. --- I dream of a society where I would be guillotined as a conservative. https://youtu.be/NkRkuI0ZgX0 <cite>CommonJoe posted [p:943579198] in AOC snubs ... [t:78920844]...</cite> <quote>__aCEr__ posted... </cite> <quote>"Those people aren't going to win that easily." starts blocking those people</quote> I see no reason to bother with someone whose insulting me. Particularly when I dont need to be suspended again for saying things similar to what Id really like to say to you people. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#176	Post #176 was unavailable or deleted.
DrizztLink 08/19/20 4:28:19 PM #177:	CommonJoe posted... Participate or leave. This is a discussion board. And my contribution is letting you know that you definitely aren't coming off well here, my dude. --- http://guidesmedia.ign.com/guides/9846/images/slowpoke.gif https://imgur.com/M8h2ATe https://imgur.com/6ezFwG1 <cite>DrizztLink posted [p:943579234] in AOC snubs ... [t:78920844]...</cite> <quote>CommonJoe posted... </cite> <quote>Participate or leave. This is a discussion board.</quote>And my contribution is letting you know that you definitely aren't coming off well here, my dude. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
masterpug53 08/19/20 4:29:55 PM #178:	shockthemonkey posted... Joe blocked me This is the funniest topic is a while I hate to say it, but Joe did manage to bring it back around to 'so bad it's good' levels of humor after Antifar gave him a peach of an opportunity to bow out with what little dignity remained, yet Joe's ego wasn't having it. This is like watching an angry drunk pick a fight with the door after it hit him hard on the ass. --- Simple questions deserve long-winded answers that no one will bother to read. <cite>masterpug53 posted [p:943579299] in AOC snubs ... [t:78920844]...</cite> <quote>shockthemonkey posted... </cite> <quote>Joe blocked me This is the funniest topic is a while</quote> I hate to say it, but Joe did manage to bring it back around to 'so bad it's good' levels of humor after Antifar gave him a peach of an opportunity to bow out with what little dignity remained, yet Joe's ego wasn't having it. This is like watching an angry drunk pick a fight with the door after it hit him hard on the ass. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#179	Post #179 was unavailable or deleted.
CommonJoe 08/19/20 4:33:50 PM #180:	DrizztLink posted... And my contribution is letting you know that you definitely aren't coming off well here, my dude. How so? Because Im not just letting these people gaslight and tell me what I did or didnt know? They're just assuming that because they don't get that my issue with this situation, as explained, is that AOC didnt get an actual slot to speak, and that her purpose for being there last night was not just known by everybody. Still no one wants to address that AOCs speaking was not framed as a nomination. Ive already explained the ridiculousness of how this conversation started and I am -still- waiting on someone to engage my actual words and actually discuss the issue. --- I dream of a society where I would be guillotined as a conservative. https://youtu.be/NkRkuI0ZgX0 <cite>CommonJoe posted [p:943579442] in AOC snubs ... [t:78920844]...</cite> <quote>DrizztLink posted... </cite> <quote>And my contribution is letting you know that you definitely aren't coming off well here, my dude.</quote> How so? Because Im not just letting these people gaslight and tell me what I did or didnt know? They're just assuming that because they don't get that my issue with this situation, as explained, is that AOC didnt get an actual slot to speak, and that her purpose for being there last night was not just known by everybody. Still no one wants to address that AOCs speaking was not framed as a nomination. Ive already explained the ridiculousness of how this conversation started and I am -still- waiting on someone to engage my actual words and actually discuss the issue. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DrizztLink 08/19/20 4:35:19 PM #181:	CommonJoe posted... her purpose for being there last night was not just known by ME That's the issue. --- http://guidesmedia.ign.com/guides/9846/images/slowpoke.gif https://imgur.com/M8h2ATe https://imgur.com/6ezFwG1 <cite>DrizztLink posted [p:943579492] in AOC snubs ... [t:78920844]...</cite> <quote>CommonJoe posted... </cite> <quote>her purpose for being there last night was not just known by ME</quote>That's the issue. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
King_Hutton 08/19/20 4:38:18 PM #182:	I agree with Joe. The DNC should have released a schedule explaining what AOC was doing and given that to the media. --- All hail King Hutton Official Carter Hutton fanboy <cite>King_Hutton posted [p:943579586] in AOC snubs ... [t:78920844]...</cite> <quote>I agree with Joe. The DNC should have released a schedule explaining what AOC was doing and given that to the media. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CommonJoe 08/19/20 4:41:43 PM #183:	DrizztLink posted... That's the issue. Yeah it is, because you're either completely oblivious to the discourse surrounding AOCs role up to last night or youre lying. Heres a topic just from this site showing that: https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/261-politics/78908571 Not a single word about it being for the nomination. Heres the article that jumped off of: https://www.businessinsider.com/alexandria-ocasio-cortez-has-one-minute-to-give-dnc-speech-2020-8? Headline doesnt mention it, and who tf knows if it clarifies in the body as its paywalled. And I can go digging up tweets and reddit posts too showing the same thing. So try me again. Try and fucking gaslight me again. --- I dream of a society where I would be guillotined as a conservative. https://youtu.be/NkRkuI0ZgX0 <cite>CommonJoe posted [p:943579759] in AOC snubs ... [t:78920844]...</cite> <quote>DrizztLink posted... </cite> <quote>That's the issue.</quote> Yeah it is, because you're either completely oblivious to the discourse surrounding AOCs role up to last night or youre lying. Heres a topic just from this site showing that: https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/261-politics/78908571 Not a single word about it being for the nomination. Heres the article that jumped off of: https://www.businessinsider.com/alexandria-ocasio-cortez-has-one-minute-to-give-dnc-speech-2020-8? Headline doesnt mention it, and who tf knows if it clarifies in the body as its paywalled. And I can go digging up tweets and reddit posts too showing the same thing. So try me again. Try and fucking gaslight me again. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CommonJoe 08/19/20 4:42:31 PM #184:	King_Hutton posted... I agree with Joe. The DNC should have released a schedule explaining what AOC was doing and given that to the media. and the media should have reported it as part of their headlines. --- I dream of a society where I would be guillotined as a conservative. https://youtu.be/NkRkuI0ZgX0 <cite>CommonJoe posted [p:943579802] in AOC snubs ... [t:78920844]...</cite> <quote>King_Hutton posted... </cite> <quote>I agree with Joe. The DNC should have released a schedule explaining what AOC was doing and given that to the media.</quote> and the media should have reported it as part of their headlines. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
harley2280 08/19/20 4:46:11 PM #185:	CommonJoe posted... harley2280 posted... You do know it's okay to admit you didn't know how it works right? Except I did know how it works; what I didnt know is that was what AOC was doing, and neither did anyone else. At this point this is just blatant gaslighting. Knock it off, address my post, or fuck off. I am addressing your post. That's the reason I quoted it. It's okay man. I understand it's hard to admit you didn't know something like the basic function of our Democratic Democracy. It's a learning experience. --- Posted with GameRaven 3.5.2 <cite>harley2280 posted [p:943579944] in AOC snubs ... [t:78920844]...</cite> <quote>CommonJoe posted...</cite> <quote>harley2280 posted... </cite> <quote> You do know it's okay to admit you didn't know how it works right?</quote> Except I did know how it works; what I didnt know is that was what AOC was doing, and neither did anyone else. At this point this is just blatant gaslighting. Knock it off, address my post, or fuck off. </quote> I am addressing your post. That's the reason I quoted it. It's okay man. I understand it's hard to admit you didn't know something like the basic function of our Democratic Democracy. It's a learning experience.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
King_Hutton 08/19/20 4:46:13 PM #186:	CommonJoe posted... and the media should have reported it as part of their headlines. Absolutely. Its not our jobs to research things before getting outraged. --- All hail King Hutton* Official Carter Hutton fanboy <cite>King_Hutton posted [p:943579946] in AOC snubs ... [t:78920844]...</cite> <quote>CommonJoe posted... </cite> <quote>*and the media should have reported it as part of their headlines.</quote>Absolutely. Its not our jobs to research things before getting outraged. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CommonJoe 08/19/20 4:51:37 PM #187:	harley2280 posted... It's okay man. I understand it's hard to admit you didn't know something like the basic function of our Democratic Democracy. It's a learning experience. Knock off the gaslighting. King_Hutton posted... Absolutely. Its not our jobs to research things before getting outraged. There was no reason to research if there was no question. If I read a headline that says AOC is getting 60 seconds for remarks, I have zero reason to assume its anything other than a speech like all the Republicans got. And that gets reinforced when every one is talking about it from that same perspective. None of you have any basis to claim I dont know how a nomination works based on those facts. --- I dream of a society where I would be guillotined as a conservative. https://youtu.be/NkRkuI0ZgX0 <cite>CommonJoe posted [p:943580164] in AOC snubs ... [t:78920844]...</cite> <quote>harley2280 posted... </cite> <quote>It's okay man. I understand it's hard to admit you didn't know something like the basic function of our Democratic Democracy. It's a learning experience.</quote> Knock off the gaslighting. King_Hutton posted... </cite> <quote>Absolutely. Its not our jobs to research things before getting outraged.</quote> There was no reason to research if there was no question. If I read a headline that says AOC is getting 60 seconds for remarks, I have zero reason to assume its anything other than a speech like all the Republicans got. And that gets reinforced when every one is talking about it from that same perspective. None of you have any basis to claim I dont know how a nomination works based on those facts. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tyranthraxus 08/19/20 4:54:17 PM #188:	CommonJoe posted... There was no reason to research if there was no question. If I read a headline that says AOC is getting 60 seconds for remarks, I have zero reason to assume its anything other than a speech like all the Republicans got. Did you actually watch the conference? Because they did get the same thing she did. A pre-recorded speech with the only difference being they endorsed Biden. --- It says right here in Matthew 16:4 "Jesus doth not need a giant Mecha." https://imgur.com/dQgC4kv <cite>Tyranthraxus posted [p:943580259] in AOC snubs ... [t:78920844]...</cite> <quote>CommonJoe posted... </cite> <quote>There was no reason to research if there was no question. If I read a headline that says AOC is getting 60 seconds for remarks, I have zero reason to assume its anything other than a speech like all the Republicans got.</quote> Did you actually watch the conference? Because they did get the same thing she did. A pre-recorded speech with the only difference being they endorsed Biden. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
harley2280 08/19/20 4:54:20 PM #189:	CommonJoe posted... harley2280 posted... It's okay man. I understand it's hard to admit you didn't know something like the basic function of our Democratic Democracy. It's a learning experience. Knock off the gaslighting. King_Hutton posted... Absolutely. Its not our jobs to research things before getting outraged. There was no reason to research if there was no question. If I read a headline that says AOC is getting 60 seconds for remarks, I have zero reason to assume its anything other than a speech like all the Republicans got. And that gets reinforced when every one is talking about it from that same perspective. None of you have any basis to claim I dont know how a nomination works based on those facts. Do you need us to explain what gaslighting actually is? Because you're using that word and it doesn't apply here. --- Posted with GameRaven 3.5.2 <cite>harley2280 posted [p:943580262] in AOC snubs ... [t:78920844]...</cite> <quote>CommonJoe posted...</cite> <quote>harley2280 posted... </cite> <quote> It's okay man. I understand it's hard to admit you didn't know something like the basic function of our Democratic Democracy. It's a learning experience.</quote> Knock off the gaslighting. King_Hutton posted... </cite> <quote> Absolutely. Its not our jobs to research things before getting outraged.</quote> There was no reason to research if there was no question. If I read a headline that says AOC is getting 60 seconds for remarks, I have zero reason to assume its anything other than a speech like all the Republicans got. And that gets reinforced when every one is talking about it from that same perspective. None of you have any basis to claim I dont know how a nomination works based on those facts. </quote> Do you need us to explain what gaslighting actually is? Because you're using that word and it doesn't apply here.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
King_Hutton 08/19/20 4:55:04 PM #190:	CommonJoe posted... There was no reason to research if there was no question. If I read a headline that says AOC is getting 60 seconds for remarks, I have zero reason to assume its anything other than a speech like all the Republicans got. And that gets reinforced when every one is talking about it from that same perspective. None of you have any basis to claim I dont know how a nomination works based on those facts. Im agreeing with you. Its the medias job to tell us everything, and if they dont report something enough for us to notice then its their fault. We shouldnt have to research why AOC is speaking in order to be upset. --- All hail King Hutton Official Carter Hutton fanboy <cite>King_Hutton posted [p:943580286] in AOC snubs ... [t:78920844]...</cite> <quote>CommonJoe posted... </cite> <quote>There was no reason to research if there was no question. If I read a headline that says AOC is getting 60 seconds for remarks, I have zero reason to assume its anything other than a speech like all the Republicans got. And that gets reinforced when every one is talking about it from that same perspective. None of you have any basis to claim I dont know how a nomination works based on those facts.</quote>Im agreeing with you. Its the medias job to tell us everything, and if they dont report something enough for us to notice then its their fault. We shouldnt have to research why AOC is speaking in order to be upset. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
harley2280 08/19/20 4:57:22 PM #191:	King_Hutton posted... CommonJoe posted... There was no reason to research if there was no question. If I read a headline that says AOC is getting 60 seconds for remarks, I have zero reason to assume its anything other than a speech like all the Republicans got. And that gets reinforced when every one is talking about it from that same perspective. None of you have any basis to claim I dont know how a nomination works based on those facts. Im agreeing with you. Its the medias job to tell us everything, and if they dont report something enough for us to notice then its their fault. We shouldnt have to research why AOC is speaking in order to be upset. That sentence is the exact problem with America today. You want to be spoon fed bullshit instead of taking the time to learn something yourself. The media has one job - make money. That's it's. They're going to go with whatever story gets the most clicks/viewers. --- Posted with GameRaven 3.5.2 <cite>harley2280 posted [p:943580370] in AOC snubs ... [t:78920844]...</cite> <quote>King_Hutton posted...</cite> <quote>CommonJoe posted... </cite> <quote> There was no reason to research if there was no question. If I read a headline that says AOC is getting 60 seconds for remarks, I have zero reason to assume its anything other than a speech like all the Republicans got. And that gets reinforced when every one is talking about it from that same perspective. None of you have any basis to claim I dont know how a nomination works based on those facts.</quote>Im agreeing with you. Its the medias job to tell us everything, and if they dont report something enough for us to notice then its their fault. We shouldnt have to research why AOC is speaking in order to be upset. </quote> That sentence is the exact problem with America today. You want to be spoon fed bullshit instead of taking the time to learn something yourself. The media has one job - make money. That's it's. They're going to go with whatever story gets the most clicks/viewers.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
King_Hutton 08/19/20 4:58:17 PM #192:	harley2280 posted... That sentence is the exact problem with America today. You want to be spoon fed bullshit instead of taking the time to learn something yourself. The media has one job - make money. That's it's. They're going to go with whatever story gets the most clicks/viewers. Were not allowed to be mad at the media for misleading us? --- All hail King Hutton Official Carter Hutton fanboy <cite>King_Hutton posted [p:943580412] in AOC snubs ... [t:78920844]...</cite> <quote>harley2280 posted... </cite> <quote>That sentence is the exact problem with America today. You want to be spoon fed bullshit instead of taking the time to learn something yourself. The media has one job - make money. That's it's. They're going to go with whatever story gets the most clicks/viewers.</quote>Were not allowed to be mad at the media for misleading us? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
GentlemanGamer 08/19/20 4:59:04 PM #193:	The media's job is to make money and to push an agenda their billionaire owners are okay with. Not to inform anyone of anything. They pretty much rely on you not being informed, so they can tell you what to think. <cite>GentlemanGamer posted [p:943580444] in AOC snubs ... [t:78920844]...</cite> <quote>The media's job is to make money and to push an agenda their billionaire owners are okay with. Not to inform anyone of anything. They pretty much rely on you not being informed, so they can tell you what to think. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
harley2280 08/19/20 4:59:55 PM #194:	King_Hutton posted... harley2280 posted... That sentence is the exact problem with America today. You want to be spoon fed bullshit instead of taking the time to learn something yourself. The media has one job - make money. That's it's. They're going to go with whatever story gets the most clicks/viewers. Were not allowed to be mad at the media for misleading us? You chose to believe it without verifying if it was factual. That's on you. --- Posted with GameRaven 3.5.2 <cite>harley2280 posted [p:943580486] in AOC snubs ... [t:78920844]...</cite> <quote>King_Hutton posted...</cite> <quote>harley2280 posted... </cite> <quote> That sentence is the exact problem with America today. You want to be spoon fed bullshit instead of taking the time to learn something yourself. The media has one job - make money. That's it's. They're going to go with whatever story gets the most clicks/viewers.</quote>Were not allowed to be mad at the media for misleading us? </quote> You chose to believe it without verifying if it was factual. That's on you.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tyranthraxus 08/19/20 5:01:12 PM #195:	King_Hutton posted... Were not allowed to be mad at the media for misleading us? This is ultimately the Crux of the issue. The people at fault here are NBC who deliberately posted false information after having already had the facts for a week. Not the DNC. --- It says right here in Matthew 16:4 "Jesus doth not need a giant Mecha." https://imgur.com/dQgC4kv <cite>Tyranthraxus posted [p:943580535] in AOC snubs ... [t:78920844]...</cite> <quote>King_Hutton posted... </cite> <quote>Were not allowed to be mad at the media for misleading us?</quote> This is ultimately the Crux of the issue. The people at fault here are NBC who deliberately posted false information after having already had the facts for a week. Not the DNC. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CommonJoe 08/19/20 5:02:42 PM #196:	Tyranthraxus posted... Did you actually watch the conference? Because they did get the same thing she did. A pre-recorded speech with the only difference being they endorsed Biden. obtuse /bt(y)oos,bt(y)oos/ adjective annoyingly insensitive or slow to understand. The only reason she was present at all was because Sanders selected her for the nomination. That is explicitly not the same thing as being invited to speak (By Biden) like the Republicans were. harley2280 posted... Do you need us to explain what gaslighting actually is? Because you're using that word and it doesn't apply here. gaslight /aslt/ verb gerund or present participle: gaslighting manipulate (someone) by psychological means into questioning their own sanity. You people continuing to try and tell me what I did or did not know, particularly based on evidence that does not logically precede such a conclusion, fits the definition quite perfectly. King_Hutton posted... Im agreeing with you No you're doing a bit to mock me. King_Hutton posted... the medias job to tell us everything, and if they dont report something enough for us to notice then its their fault. This, but unironically. Lets remember that the NBC debacle is a literal example of the problem, as is the business insider article I linked earlier. And again, between that and the actual discourse regarding AOCs role, there was no reason to look further. It quacked like a duck and smelled like a duck, so I had no reason to lift the proverbial cloth to see if it looked like one too. --- I dream of a society where I would be guillotined as a conservative. https://youtu.be/NkRkuI0ZgX0 <cite>CommonJoe posted [p:943580594] in AOC snubs ... [t:78920844]...</cite> <quote>Tyranthraxus posted... </cite> <quote>Did you actually watch the conference? Because they did get the same thing she did. A pre-recorded speech with the only difference being they endorsed Biden.</quote> obtuse /bt(y)oos,bt(y)oos/ adjective annoyingly insensitive or slow to understand. The only reason she was present at all was because Sanders selected her for the nomination. That is explicitly not the same thing as being invited to speak (By Biden) like the Republicans were. harley2280 posted... </cite> <quote>Do you need us to explain what gaslighting actually is? Because you're using that word and it doesn't apply here.</quote> gaslight /aslt/ verb gerund or present participle: gaslighting manipulate (someone) by psychological means into questioning their own sanity. You people continuing to try and tell me what I did or did not know, particularly based on evidence that does not logically precede such a conclusion, fits the definition quite perfectly. King_Hutton posted... </cite> <quote>Im agreeing with you</quote> No you're doing a bit to mock me. King_Hutton posted... </cite> <quote>the medias job to tell us everything, and if they dont report something enough for us to notice then its their fault.</quote> This, but unironically. Lets remember that the NBC debacle is a literal example of the problem, as is the business insider article I linked earlier. And again, between that and the actual discourse regarding AOCs role, there was no reason to look further. It quacked like a duck and smelled like a duck, so I had no reason to lift the proverbial cloth to see if it looked like one too. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tyranthraxus 08/19/20 5:03:56 PM #197:	CommonJoe posted... manipulate (someone) by psychological means into questioning their own sanity. Joe man, you are not crazy, you are just wrong. --- It says right here in Matthew 16:4 "Jesus doth not need a giant Mecha." https://imgur.com/dQgC4kv <cite>Tyranthraxus posted [p:943580642] in AOC snubs ... [t:78920844]...</cite> <quote>CommonJoe posted... </cite> <quote>manipulate (someone) by psychological means into questioning their own sanity.</quote> Joe man, you are not crazy, you are just wrong. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
harley2280 08/19/20 5:05:01 PM #198:	CommonJoe posted... Tyranthraxus posted... Did you actually watch the conference? Because they did get the same thing she did. A pre-recorded speech with the only difference being they endorsed Biden. obtuse /bt(y)oos,bt(y)oos/ adjective <ol> <li>annoyingly insensitive or slow to understand.</li></ol> The only reason she was present at all was because Sanders selected her for the nomination. That is explicitly not the same thing as being invited to speak (By Biden) like the Republicans were. harley2280 posted... Do you need us to explain what gaslighting actually is? Because you're using that word and it doesn't apply here. gaslight /aslt/ verb gerund or present participle: gaslighting <ol> <li>manipulate (someone) by psychological means into questioning their own sanity.</li></ol> You people continuing to try and tell me what I did or did not know, particularly based on evidence that does not logically precede such a conclusion, fits the definition quite perfectly. King_Hutton posted... Im agreeing with you No you're doing a bit to mock me. King_Hutton posted... the medias job to tell us everything, and if they dont report something enough for us to notice then its their fault. This, but unironically. Lets remember that the NBC debacle is a literal example of the problem, as is the business insider article I linked earlier. And again, between that and the actual discourse regarding AOCs role, there was no reason to look further. It quacked like a duck and smelled like a duck, so I had no reason to lift the proverbial cloth to see if it looked like one too. Yeah that gaslighting definition isn't what's happening here. No one is trying to psychologically manipulate you. We're telling you you're wrong because you are. --- Posted with GameRaven 3.5.2 <cite>harley2280 posted [p:943580681] in AOC snubs ... [t:78920844]...</cite> <quote>CommonJoe posted...</cite> <quote>Tyranthraxus posted... </cite> <quote> Did you actually watch the conference? Because they did get the same thing she did. A pre-recorded speech with the only difference being they endorsed Biden.</quote> obtuse /bt(y)oos,bt(y)oos/ adjective <ol> <li>annoyingly insensitive or slow to understand.</li></ol> The only reason she was present at all was because Sanders selected her for the nomination. That is explicitly not the same thing as being invited to speak (By Biden) like the Republicans were. harley2280 posted... </cite> <quote> Do you need us to explain what gaslighting actually is? Because you're using that word and it doesn't apply here.</quote> gaslight /aslt/ verb gerund or present participle: gaslighting <ol> <li>manipulate (someone) by psychological means into questioning their own sanity.</li></ol> You people continuing to try and tell me what I did or did not know, particularly based on evidence that does not logically precede such a conclusion, fits the definition quite perfectly. King_Hutton posted... </cite> <quote> Im agreeing with you</quote> No you're doing a bit to mock me. King_Hutton posted... </cite> <quote> the medias job to tell us everything, and if they dont report something enough for us to notice then its their fault.</quote> This, but unironically. Lets remember that the NBC debacle is a literal example of the problem, as is the business insider article I linked earlier. And again, between that and the actual discourse regarding AOCs role, there was no reason to look further. It quacked like a duck and smelled like a duck, so I had no reason to lift the proverbial cloth to see if it looked like one too. </quote> Yeah that gaslighting definition isn't what's happening here. No one is trying to psychologically manipulate you. We're telling you you're wrong because you are.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
King_Hutton 08/19/20 5:08:02 PM #199:	CommonJoe posted... No you're doing a bit to mock me. Why are you acting like a dick? CommonJoe posted... gaslight /aslt/ verb gerund or present participle: gaslighting manipulate (someone) by psychological means into questioning their own sanity. Dont fucking do this to me if youre going to be mad when people do it to you --- All hail King Hutton Official Carter Hutton fanboy <cite>King_Hutton posted [p:943580819] in AOC snubs ... [t:78920844]...</cite> <quote>CommonJoe posted... </cite> <quote>No you're doing a bit to mock me.</quote> Why are you acting like a dick? CommonJoe posted... </cite> <quote>gaslight /aslt/ verb gerund or present participle: gaslighting manipulate (someone) by psychological means into questioning their own sanity.</quote>Dont fucking do this to me if youre going to be mad when people do it to you </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CommonJoe 08/19/20 5:08:12 PM #200:	Tyranthraxus posted... Joe man, you are not crazy, you are just wrong. Then engage my arguments. Dont just insist Im wrong and then pitch a hissy fit when I dont just lay down and accept that. Participate. harley2280 posted... We're telling you you're wrong because you are. See above. Telling Im wrong ad nauseum while refusing to acknowledge anything Ive said regarding the actual issue does you no favors and just reinforces my assessment. --- I dream of a society where I would be guillotined as a conservative. https://youtu.be/NkRkuI0ZgX0 <cite>CommonJoe posted [p:943580831] in AOC snubs ... [t:78920844]...</cite> <quote>Tyranthraxus posted... </cite> <quote>Joe man, you are not crazy, you are just wrong.</quote> Then engage my arguments. Dont just insist Im wrong and then pitch a hissy fit when I dont just lay down and accept that. Participate. harley2280 posted... </cite> <quote>We're telling you you're wrong because you are.</quote> See above. Telling Im wrong ad nauseum while refusing to acknowledge anything Ive said regarding the actual issue does you no favors and just reinforces my assessment. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CommonJoe 08/19/20 5:11:18 PM #201:	King_Hutton posted... Why are you acting like a dick? Because you aren't being as subtle as you think you are. --- I dream of a society where I would be guillotined as a conservative. https://youtu.be/NkRkuI0ZgX0 <cite>CommonJoe posted [p:943580958] in AOC snubs ... [t:78920844]...</cite> <quote>King_Hutton posted... </cite> <quote>Why are you acting like a dick?</quote> Because you aren't being as subtle as you think you are. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7

Current Events > AOC snubs Biden in speech instead endorses Bernie Sanders for President (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > AOC snubs Biden in speech instead endorses Bernie Sanders for President