Current Events > UK house of lords calls for regulations on loot boxes

Topic List	Page List: 1
AceMos 07/02/20 12:58:48 PM #1:	https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9WnJG3Wi54 one more step forward a 100 to go --- 3 things 1. i am female 2. i havea msucle probelm its hard for me to typ well 3.does her janpuu dance <cite>AceMos posted [p:941573104] in UK house o... [t:78819394]...</cite> <quote>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9WnJG3Wi54 one more step forward a 100 to go </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Doe 07/02/20 1:00:34 PM #2:	Imagine having a chamber of parliament based on hereditary titles --- This signature won't be changed until at least one out of Astrograph Sorcerer, Double-Iris Magician, Performapal Monkeyboard or Electrumite is unbanned. 2/15/20 <cite>Doe posted [p:941573183] in UK house o... [t:78819394]...</cite> <quote>Imagine having a chamber of parliament based on hereditary titles </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DeadBankerDream 07/02/20 1:01:21 PM #3:	I don't understand why the British population views the continued existence of the house of lords as acceptable. Powerless monarchy, understandable. Fully. ""Powerless"" upper house of parliament that gets to advice in political matter based entirely on birth, status in the state church or appointment by lord fartministers of ages past? How is that acceptable in a "democracy"? --- "That thick shaft that causes women to shudder!" <cite>DeadBankerDream posted [p:941573223] in UK house o... [t:78819394]...</cite> <quote>I don't understand why the British population views the continued existence of the house of lords as acceptable. Powerless monarchy, understandable. Fully. ""Powerless"" upper house of parliament that gets to advice in political matter based entirely on birth, status in the state church or appointment by lord fartministers of ages past? How is that acceptable in a "democracy"?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Maze_ 07/02/20 1:02:48 PM #4:	Doe posted... Imagine having a chamber of parliament based on hereditary titles It fucking sucks DeadBankerDream posted... ""Powerless"" upper house of parliament that gets to advice in political matter based entirely on birth, status in the state church or appointment by lord fartministers of ages past? How is that acceptable in a "democracy"? It's not but Britan is allergic to change. --- When the going gets tough, the tough go have a little cry in the corner. "Your mustache is crooked" ~ R.I.P Randy Savage. <cite>Maze_ posted [p:941573290] in UK house o... [t:78819394]...</cite> <quote>Doe posted... </cite> <quote>Imagine having a chamber of parliament based on hereditary titles</quote> It fucking sucks DeadBankerDream posted... </cite> <quote> ""Powerless"" upper house of parliament that gets to advice in political matter based entirely on birth, status in the state church or appointment by lord fartministers of ages past? How is that acceptable in a "democracy"?</quote> It's not but Britan is allergic to change. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
AceMos 07/02/20 1:03:40 PM #5:	DeadBankerDream posted... I don't understand why the British population views the continued existence of the house of lords as acceptable. Powerless monarchy, understandable. Fully. ""Powerless"" upper house of parliament that gets to advice in political matter based entirely on birth, status in the state church or appointment by lord fartministers of ages past? How is that acceptable in a "democracy"? indeed thoe us americans are not much better we give CEOs lots of control of the country and CEOs are the same thing as kings of old --- 3 things 1. i am female 2. i havea msucle probelm its hard for me to typ well 3.does her janpuu dance <cite>AceMos posted [p:941573336] in UK house o... [t:78819394]...</cite> <quote>DeadBankerDream posted... </cite> <quote>I don't understand why the British population views the continued existence of the house of lords as acceptable. Powerless monarchy, understandable. Fully. ""Powerless"" upper house of parliament that gets to advice in political matter based entirely on birth, status in the state church or appointment by lord fartministers of ages past? How is that acceptable in a "democracy"?</quote>indeed thoe us americans are not much better we give CEOs lots of control of the country and CEOs are the same thing as kings of old </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Trelve 07/02/20 1:04:21 PM #7:	DeadBankerDream posted... I don't understand why the British population views the continued existence of the house of lords as acceptable. Powerless monarchy, understandable. Fully. ""Powerless"" upper house of parliament that gets to advice in political matter based entirely on birth, status in the state church or appointment by lord fartministers of ages past? How is that acceptable in a "democracy"? The majority of us don't, but there's not a lot you can do about the House of Lords. All major parties have members in the HoL so they'd never vote to scrap it. It is what it is. <cite>Trelve posted [p:941573364] in UK house o... [t:78819394]...</cite> <quote>DeadBankerDream posted... </cite> <quote>I don't understand why the British population views the continued existence of the house of lords as acceptable. Powerless monarchy, understandable. Fully. ""Powerless"" upper house of parliament that gets to advice in political matter based entirely on birth, status in the state church or appointment by lord fartministers of ages past? How is that acceptable in a "democracy"?</quote>The majority of us don't, but there's not a lot you can do about the House of Lords. All major parties have members in the HoL so they'd never vote to scrap it. It is what it is. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Anticyclonic 07/02/20 1:04:37 PM #8:	The fact that the UK has a House of Lords --- If this signature appears blue, you need to consider not doing whatever it is you're doing. <cite>Anticyclonic posted [p:941573374] in UK house o... [t:78819394]...</cite> <quote>The fact that the UK has a House of Lords </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Doe 07/02/20 1:10:19 PM #9:	Trelve posted... The majority of us don't, but there's not a lot you can do about the House of Lords. All major parties have members in the HoL so they'd never vote to scrap it. It is what it is. It's large majority conservative though (and lol who would've guessed). Shouldn't it be expedient for any other party to demolish it then? --- This signature won't be changed until at least one out of Astrograph Sorcerer, Double-Iris Magician, Performapal Monkeyboard or Electrumite is unbanned. 2/15/20 <cite>Doe posted [p:941573617] in UK house o... [t:78819394]...</cite> <quote>Trelve posted... </cite> <quote>The majority of us don't, but there's not a lot you can do about the House of Lords. All major parties have members in the HoL so they'd never vote to scrap it. It is what it is.</quote>It's large majority conservative though (and lol who would've guessed). Shouldn't it be expedient for any other party to demolish it then? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Trelve 07/02/20 1:16:28 PM #10:	Doe posted... It's large majority conservative though (and lol who would've guessed). Shouldn't it be expedient for any other party to demolish it then? Labour have 177 peers in the house compared to the Conservatives 243. You're operating under the assumption that Labour would want to get rid of the HoL. When/if they get back into power, they'll recommend their friends for peerages and the whole cycle starts again. You're looking in the wrong place if you expect the Conservatives or Labour to even consider getting rid of the House of Lords. <cite>Trelve posted [p:941573868] in UK house o... [t:78819394]...</cite> <quote>Doe posted... </cite> <quote>It's large majority conservative though (and lol who would've guessed). Shouldn't it be expedient for any other party to demolish it then?</quote>Labour have 177 peers in the house compared to the Conservatives 243. You're operating under the assumption that Labour would want to get rid of the HoL. When/if they get back into power, they'll recommend their friends for peerages and the whole cycle starts again. You're looking in the wrong place if you expect the Conservatives or Labour to even consider getting rid of the House of Lords. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
solosnake 07/02/20 1:19:04 PM #11:	AceMos posted... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9WnJG3Wi54 one more step forward a 100 to go good old jim, one of the only truth tellers in the industry calling this garbage out for years --- "We would have no NBA possibly if they got rid of all the flopping." ~ Dwyane Wade https://imgur.com/MYYEIx5 https://imgur.com/WGE12ef <cite>solosnake posted [p:941573999] in UK house o... [t:78819394]...</cite> <quote>AceMos posted... </cite> <quote>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9WnJG3Wi54 one more step forward a 100 to go</quote>good old jim, one of the only truth tellers in the industry calling this garbage out for years </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1

Current Events > UK house of lords calls for regulations on loot boxes (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > UK house of lords calls for regulations on loot boxes