Current Events > Hillary Duff posted an explicit image of her son tied up naked

(+) Yeah! (+)

It's out there in the twitter verse. There was some sort of liquid on him as well. Very weird.

wat

---

. . .wat

---

. . . . . wat

Apparently it's true. There's another topic about it in this board.

---

Never have I been so quickly disinterested from reading a topic title after the first 7 words.


---

I highly doubt it.

---

I'm torn between morbid curiosity and utter revulsion.

---

Maybe you shouldn't post a video of your 8 year old son nude on the internet.

EricDraven59 posted...

Maybe you shouldn't post a video of your 8 year old son nude on the internet.

Maybe our society should stop sexualising any and all nudity


---

pinky0926 posted...

Maybe our society should stop sexualising any and all nudity

Naked 8 year olds don't need to be in view of any society.

---

Being naked is one thing, but why the fuck would he be tied up?

---

Is he actually 8? Or is it just like a naked infant sitting in a bathtub picture that people post sometimes for whatever reason

---

The fuck breh

---

FaultyGourry posted...

Naked 8 year olds don't need to be in view of any society.

I'm not gonna say its wise for parents to put their kids online but it's a worry when people start making it perverted

Think how many parents you know who have casually let their toddlers walk around naked at a pool or have put up naked baby photos on Facebook. It's a worry that some people draw any kind of sexual context to that. Says more about their perspective than anything else.

---

CasualGuy posted...

Is he actually 8? Or is it just like a naked infant sitting in a bathtub picture that people post sometimes for whatever reason

From what I've heard, he's about 8 or so and is on a bed wrapped up in saran wrap with liquid on his chest. It wasn't just a naked picture, but it was a weird looking photo from what has been described. I haven't seen the image myself though

https://twitter.com/HilaryDuff/status/1264225767161913345

Probably some made up shit.
---

^The censored image is in that tweet thread. Doesn't look good imo

If you go looking for the picture then you have issues

---

KiwiTerraRizing posted...

If you go looking for the picture then you have issues

For real. I don't even understand dudes who go looking for footage of people being killed/raped online, they should be looking for psychologists to talk to instead

---

Scotty_Rogers posted...

For real. I don't even understand dudes who go looking for footage of people being killed/raped online, they should be looking for psychologists to talk to instead

100% Fam

---

If thats directed at me, just know I didn't go looking for the image it popped up while I was reading the twitter responses

pinky0926 posted...

Maybe our society should stop sexualising any and all nudity

There are a lot of pedos out there

RemixRBG posted...

If thats directed at me, just know I didn't go looking for the image it popped up while I was reading the twitter responses

"Son what's that on your computer"
"It was just popups Dad"

---

Y'all trying to protect Hillary Duff. She's weird for posting that and even doing that to her son

im not even remotely interested

givin' the gamefaqs the ol' in n' out

burger

Scotty_Rogers posted...

For real. I don't even understand dudes who go looking for footage of people being killed/raped online, they should be looking for psychologists to talk to instead

I agree, but I find this sort of "they should see a psychiatrist" judgement particularly rich coming from a guy who faked his brother's death.

---

https://www.reddit.com/r/OutOfTheLoop/comments/gp3yr5/whats_the_deal_with_hilary_duff_being_canceled_on/

Answer: Hilary Duff posted a picture on Instagram of her 8-year old son after bathtime in which he was naked on a towel with lotion squirted on him. She deleted it after people pointed out it was inappropriate.

Apparently, some people misidentified the lotion as being light reflected from him being bound with Saran Wrap. Others claimed that the lotion was squeezed in a coded pattern. In any case, this is being interpreted as her advertising her son to a covert group of Hollywood pedophiles, who apparently peruse IG in order to find celebrity children to abuse.

I suspect not many of the proponents of this theory actually believe it, but from looking at Twitter, I guess publicly accusing a woman of child abuse is a good excuse to post some funny memes.

---

MrMallard posted...

I agree, but I find this sort of "they should see a psychiatrist" judgement particularly rich coming from a guy who faked his brother's death.

Hes typing out loud obviously, seems like a cry for help

---

I'm always amazed by the depths that people go to make a conspiracy/be outraged. I seriously cant fathom how these people connect these dots.

---

Well if it was innocent and not meant to be explicit ( I dont know because Im not looking for it nor care for the logic behind it), that kid will be a teenager one day, will be in high school and this will forever haunt him. And to his teenager brain, have destroyed his life. Possibly sliding into a Corey Haim style depression

---

KiwiTerraRizing posted...

If you go looking for the picture then you have issues

With that kind of attitude, you'll get manipulated too easily. You gotta be a truth seeker. Lemme give you a tangentially related story.

In my community's usual research and daily news of Chainlink, we saw a new partnership. Celsius Network. A project that wants to be THE bank of crypto and the Chainlink team was going to stake some of their assets in CN's network. Is this is a possible company to invest in if we were to ever look for another company to throw our money at? Dunno, let's find out. So naturally, the community Googles every single member of the company to vet them. Among them, the CEO is Alex Mashinsky, inventor of Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP), incredible. But more glaringly, what eclipsed the discussions at the time, among them is this one girl... Literally on the first page of a Google search was a porn video of her. And she had quite the title in the company (paraphrased) a lead in institutional lending where she was managing a portfolio, hundreds of millions of dollars worth of assets.

So naturally, people would be up in arms that someone, who lacked the foresight to think doing a porn flick was not a good idea, ended up in such a position where we have to be associated with. So the news spread like wildfire and some twitter personality reported on it. Then, out of the shadows, Jane Doe appeared! And she made the claim that the video was a creation of sex trafficking and pulled up the court claims to back up the case that the creators of the video preyed on women. So was the community collectively in the wrong and this girl truly was innocent? Why weren't people taking her seriously? That's when I dug for myself the porn video to see what's up.

No. Heavens no. Not in a million years. Sure, the court claims could apply to the other girls. But not "Jane Doe" in question. The first 8 minutes of the "plot" (the interview) killed any chance she had in convincing she got ployed. From the video:

"What's your name?"
"Uh......" *Says real name*

"Why did you sign up with us?"
"Cause I just wanted something fun to do"

"Are you nervous"
"No not really"

"What are you studying right now?"
"Uh... business? I don't really know..."

And while other videos had girls who clearly looked visibly uncomfortable, she was enthusiastic. She was a PRO. She was ON POINT. No one is going to believe her case personally, not with that spectacular display of airheadedness and that performance.

Anyways, the point is to do your due diligence and investigate. Find the truth. If you're going to be insecure on how you'll be perceived looking into something, you'll only hold yourself back.
---

Rebel_Patriot posted...

Well if it was innocent and not meant to be explicit ( I dont know because Im not looking for it nor care for the logic behind it), that kid will be a teenager one day, will be in high school and this will forever haunt him. And to his teenager brain, have destroyed his life. Possibly sliding into a Corey Haim style depression

I'll take "That's a bit extreme" for 1000

---

The fuck.

---

This topic just gets worse and worse.

---

I've heard about this elsewhere

No way in hell I'm going to verify if it's true or not.

---

yikes

---

Sad_Face posted...

With that kind of attitude, you'll get manipulated too easily. You gotta be a truth seeker. Lemme give you a tangentially related story.

In my community's usual research and daily news of Chainlink, we saw a new partnership. Celsius Network. A project that wants to be THE bank of crypto and the Chainlink team was going to stake some of their assets in CN's network. Is this is a possible company to invest in if we were to ever look for another company to throw our money at? Dunno, let's find out. So naturally, the community Googles every single member of the company to vet them. Among them, the CEO is Alex Mashinsky, inventor of Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP), incredible. But more glaringly, what eclipsed the discussions at the time, among them is this one girl... Literally on the first page of a Google search was a porn video of her. And she had quite the title in the company (paraphrased) a lead in institutional lending where she was managing a portfolio, hundreds of millions of dollars worth of assets.

So naturally, people would be up in arms that someone, who lacked the foresight to think doing a porn flick was not a good idea, ended up in such a position where we have to be associated with. So the news spread like wildfire and some twitter personality reported on it. Then, out of the shadows, Jane Doe appeared! And she made the claim that the video was a creation of sex trafficking and pulled up the court claims to back up the case that the creators of the video preyed on women. So was the community collectively in the wrong and this girl truly was innocent? Why weren't people taking her seriously? That's when I dug for myself the porn video to see what's up.

No. Heavens no. Not in a million years. Sure, the court claims could apply to the other girls. But not "Jane Doe" in question. The first 8 minutes of the "plot" (the interview) killed any chance she had in convincing she got ployed. From the video:

"What's your name?"
"Uh......" *Says real name*

"Why did you sign up with us?"
"Cause I just wanted something fun to do"

"Are you nervous"
"No not really"

"What are you studying right now?"
"Uh... business? I don't really know..."

And while other videos had girls who clearly looked visibly uncomfortable, she was enthusiastic. She was a PRO. She was ON POINT. No one is going to believe her case personally, not with that spectacular display of airheadedness and that performance.

Anyways, the point is to do your due diligence and investigate. Find the truth. If you're going to be insecure on how you'll be perceived looking into something, you'll only hold yourself back.

Brainworms

Vicious_Dios posted...

Never have I been so quickly disinterested from reading a topic title after the first 7 words.

---

it's so much safer for me to just shitpost here

---

p.s. this topic is fucking aids

just let it die in fire

---

Hillary Duff posted an explicit image

:D

of her son tied up naked

D:

---

*throws topic in a dumpster*


---

*throws that dumpster into another dumpster to fit all the dumpster posters*

---