Current Events > What tactical advantage does AT-AT give?

Topic List	Page List: 1
IdiotMachine 01/05/20 2:04:05 PM #1:	Seems so goofy, and it's always just destroyed over the stupidest shit (two logs hitting them, falling into a deep hole, etc.). --- https://imgur.com/XNEdLrJ <cite>IdiotMachine posted [p:932501109] in What tacti... [t:78307763]...</cite> <quote>Seems so goofy, and it's always just destroyed over the stupidest shit (two logs hitting them, falling into a deep hole, etc.). </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
UnfairRepresent 01/05/20 2:04:27 PM #2:	High Ground --- ^ Hey now that's completely unfair! https://imgtc.com/i/bHqCLJF.png https://i.imgtc.com/YnvkpvU.png <cite>UnfairRepresent posted [p:932501130] in What tacti... [t:78307763]...</cite> <quote>High Ground</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ArchNemo 01/05/20 2:05:45 PM #3:	I mean, it's armoured and presumably has a much higher level of fire power. <cite>ArchNemo posted [p:932501172] in What tacti... [t:78307763]...</cite> <quote>I mean, it's armoured and presumably has a much higher level of fire power. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Touch 01/05/20 2:07:44 PM #4:	I read topic title as AT&T --- https://imgur.com/DlAxjk6 <cite>Touch posted [p:932501266] in What tacti... [t:78307763]...</cite> <quote>I read topic title as AT&T </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
IloveJesus 01/05/20 2:08:35 PM #5:	Aren't they normally only taken out by named characters? --- Jesus loves us. It only seems fair to love him back. <cite>IloveJesus posted [p:932501305] in What tacti... [t:78307763]...</cite> <quote>Aren't they normally only taken out by named characters? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CyricZ 01/05/20 2:09:08 PM #6:	It's basically a tank that's higher up. It can hold heavy ordnance that repulsorcraft can't manage. --- CyricZ <cite>CyricZ posted [p:932501327] in What tacti... [t:78307763]...</cite> <quote>It's basically a tank that's higher up. It can hold heavy ordnance that repulsorcraft can't manage. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Bluebomber182 01/05/20 2:11:04 PM #7:	IloveJesus posted... Aren't they normally only taken out by named characters? They got taken out by Ewoks & Jawas before --- Not changing this sig until Big E or Xavier Woods turn heel and attack Kofi Started 4/14/19 <cite>Bluebomber182 posted [p:932501402] in What tacti... [t:78307763]...</cite> <quote>IloveJesus posted...</cite> <quote>Aren't they normally only taken out by named characters? </quote> They got taken out by Ewoks & Jawas before</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DarthAragorn 01/05/20 2:12:34 PM #8:	Bluebomber182 posted... IloveJesus posted... Aren't they normally only taken out by named characters? They got taken out by Ewoks & Jawas before There were no AT-ATs in RotJ And I don't know when Jawas would have encountered them <cite>DarthAragorn posted [p:932501460] in What tacti... [t:78307763]...</cite> <quote>Bluebomber182 posted...</cite> <quote>IloveJesus posted...</cite> <quote> Aren't they normally only taken out by named characters? </quote> They got taken out by Ewoks & Jawas before</quote> There were no AT-ATs in RotJ And I don't know when Jawas would have encountered them</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Verdekal 01/05/20 2:16:36 PM #9:	Now I'm imagining it squealing like a pig like ED-209. --- Don't tease the octopus, kids! <cite>Verdekal posted [p:932501643] in What tacti... [t:78307763]...</cite> <quote>Now I'm imagining it squealing like a pig like ED-209. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CyricZ 01/05/20 2:18:11 PM #10:	DarthAragorn posted... There were no AT-ATs in RotJ Actually there was one. It was in the scene where Luke turns himself in to the Empire. It didn't appear again though and wasn't "fought". --- CyricZ <cite>CyricZ posted [p:932501719] in What tacti... [t:78307763]...</cite> <quote>DarthAragorn posted... </cite> <quote>There were no AT-ATs in RotJ</quote>Actually there was one. It was in the scene where Luke turns himself in to the Empire. It didn't appear again though and wasn't "fought". </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
UnholyMudcrab 01/05/20 2:31:37 PM #11:	Those are AT-STs --- https://imgur.com/VeNBg https://imgur.com/gd5jC8q https://imgur.com/PKIy7 https://imgur.com/3p29JqP <cite>UnholyMudcrab posted [p:932502273] in What tacti... [t:78307763]...</cite> <quote>Those are AT-STs</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DevsBro 01/05/20 2:34:43 PM #12:	They just look cool. Being big probably lets them be better armored and carry bigger weapons but being tall is at best mostly psychological but more likely just the look Lucas and/or the ESB design team liked. I suppose if you really wanted to reach, it may give the pilot a better vantage point for locating guerrilla combatants, which is of course right in line with OT and ST warfare, but that's really pushing it. --- 53 LIII 0b110101 p16 0x35 <cite>DevsBro posted [p:932502443] in What tacti... [t:78307763]...</cite> <quote>They just look cool. Being big probably lets them be better armored and carry bigger weapons but being tall is at best mostly psychological but more likely just the look Lucas and/or the ESB design team liked. I suppose if you really wanted to reach, it may give the pilot a better vantage point for locating guerrilla combatants, which is of course right in line with OT and ST warfare, but that's really pushing it. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KamenRiderBlade 01/05/20 2:35:58 PM #13:	The Psychological Terror was part of the Tarkin Doctrine. That's why they designed the AT-AT / AT-ST the way they did. --- Are you a MexiCAN or a MexiCAN'T - Johnny Depp '*Once Upon A Time in Mexico*' <cite>KamenRiderBlade posted [p:932502480] in What tacti... [t:78307763]...</cite> <quote>The Psychological Terror was part of the Tarkin Doctrine. That's why they designed the AT-AT / AT-ST the way they did. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
PrettyBoyFloyd 01/05/20 2:37:56 PM #14:	Back in the early 80s the kid that got a AT-AT for Christmas was the luckiest person in the world. I now imagine what if they had a full scale version for the thing to match the action figures of the time. --- The Evil Republicans - Est.2004 - WoT [Government Destabilizing Branch] <cite>PrettyBoyFloyd posted [p:932502566] in What tacti... [t:78307763]...</cite> <quote>Back in the early 80s the kid that got a AT-AT for Christmas was the luckiest person in the world. I now imagine what if they had a full scale version for the thing to match the action figures of the time. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Foppe 01/05/20 2:41:27 PM #15:	https://youtu.be/uXs1iG0229E --- GameFAQs isn't going to be merged in with GameSpot or any other site. We're not going to strip out the soul of the site. -CJayC <cite>Foppe posted [p:932502731] in What tacti... [t:78307763]...</cite> <quote>https://youtu.be/uXs1iG0229E </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Damn_Underscore 01/05/20 2:42:11 PM #16:	They made the mistake of giving AT-ATs giant legs instead of wheels. If the AT-ATs had wheels the rebellion would have been decimated at Hoth --- Shenmue II = best game of all time Shenmue = 2nd best game of all time <cite>Damn_Underscore posted [p:932502756] in What tacti... [t:78307763]...</cite> <quote>They made the mistake of giving AT-ATs giant legs instead of wheels. If the AT-ATs had wheels the rebellion would have been decimated at Hoth</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Pepys Monster 01/05/20 2:43:21 PM #17:	They're intimidating, I guess. --- GOML <cite>Pepys Monster posted [p:932502801] in What tacti... [t:78307763]...</cite> <quote>They're intimidating, I guess. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Akagami_Shanks 01/05/20 2:45:56 PM #18:	they're heavily armored and nigh indestructible to conventional gunfire. Unless you're in a ship, if you're face to face with an AT-AT you're pretty much done for. --- PSN: TYruler50 XBL: TYruler50, Switch: 4538-0715-0699, Battle.net: TYmaster50#1751, Steam: TYmaster50, 3DS FC: 4614-3266-5802, Wii U: Tymaster7601 <cite>Akagami_Shanks posted [p:932502919] in What tacti... [t:78307763]...</cite> <quote>they're heavily armored and nigh indestructible to conventional gunfire. Unless you're in a ship, if you're face to face with an AT-AT you're pretty much done for. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
AvantgardeAClue 01/05/20 2:49:25 PM #19:	IloveJesus posted... Aren't they normally only taken out by named characters? Lol --- Sometimes I say things and I'm not voice acting. <cite>AvantgardeAClue posted [p:932503045] in What tacti... [t:78307763]...</cite> <quote>IloveJesus posted... </cite> <quote>Aren't they normally only taken out by named characters?</quote> Lol </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Touch 01/05/20 2:51:39 PM #20:	They also make for a pretty dope game mode in Star Wars Battlefront --- https://imgur.com/DlAxjk6 <cite>Touch posted [p:932503123] in What tacti... [t:78307763]...</cite> <quote>They also make for a pretty dope game mode in Star Wars Battlefront </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
PrettyBoyFloyd 01/05/20 2:56:06 PM #21:	I never understood why they didn't have side guns mounted on them. --- The Evil Republicans - Est.2004 - WoT [Government Destabilizing Branch] <cite>PrettyBoyFloyd posted [p:932503327] in What tacti... [t:78307763]...</cite> <quote>I never understood why they didn't have side guns mounted on them. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KamenRiderBlade 01/05/20 3:57:10 PM #22:	PrettyBoyFloyd posted... I never understood why they didn't have side guns mounted on them. Cost savings. --- Are you a MexiCAN or a MexiCAN'T - Johnny Depp '*Once Upon A Time in Mexico*' <cite>KamenRiderBlade posted [p:932506330] in What tacti... [t:78307763]...</cite> <quote>PrettyBoyFloyd posted... </cite> <quote>I never understood why they didn't have side guns mounted on them.</quote>Cost savings. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1

Current Events > What tactical advantage does AT-AT give? (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > What tactical advantage does AT-AT give?