Current Events > Twitter bullies brought Jordan Peterson to tears.

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3
Goats 10/26/19 12:35:05 AM #51:	How many LGBT people have been driven to near suicide by this guy's hate or his influence? --- Do good. Eat tin cans <cite>Goats posted [p:929251014] in Twitter bu... [t:78111759]...</cite> <quote>How many LGBT people have been driven to near suicide by this guy's hate or his influence?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Solid Snake07 10/26/19 12:35:18 AM #52:	averagejoel posted... Solid Snake07 posted... averagejoel posted... Solid Snake07 posted... Godnorgosh posted... I wonder if he considered that trans people find it similarly upsetting when someone deliberately refuses to use their preferred pronouns or acknowledge their gender identity. He never advocated that people should refuse to adopt someone's preferred pronouns. He said the government shouldn't legislate speech, the particular case just happened to be about preferred pronouns he may have had a point if the bill had anything to do with legislating speech, or even if it mentioned the word "pronoun" at all I dont really know much about the bill itself to be honest. What was it? https://www.parl.ca/DocumentViewer/en/42-1/bill/c-16/first-reading Im posting on a video game message board slightly drunk on a Friday night. I'm definitely not reading a bill. If you can tell me what it is and why it's misrepresented by peterson Im open ears --- "People incapable of guilt usually do have a good time" -Detective Rust Cohle <cite>Solid Snake07 posted [p:929251022] in Twitter bu... [t:78111759]...</cite> <quote>averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote>Solid Snake07 posted...</cite> <quote>averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote>Solid Snake07 posted...</cite> <quote>Godnorgosh posted...</cite> <quote>I wonder if he considered that trans people find it similarly upsetting when someone deliberately refuses to use their preferred pronouns or acknowledge their gender identity.</quote> He never advocated that people should refuse to adopt someone's preferred pronouns. He said the government shouldn't legislate speech, the particular case just happened to be about preferred pronouns</quote> he may have had a point if the bill had anything to do with legislating speech, or even if it mentioned the word "pronoun" at all</quote> I dont really know much about the bill itself to be honest. What was it?</quote> https://www.parl.ca/DocumentViewer/en/42-1/bill/c-16/first-reading</quote> Im posting on a video game message board slightly drunk on a Friday night. I'm definitely not reading a bill. If you can tell me what it is and why it's misrepresented by peterson Im open ears</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Bio1590 10/26/19 12:35:34 AM #53:	Why are we still supposed to care about this guy. Solid Snake07 posted... I know I saw an interview where he was asked if a student of his asked him to use a preferred pronoun he would. He just didnt agree with being forced to by law. This is wrong, he's literally on-the-record stated that he would refuse to use non-gendered pronouns if requested. And he literally never represented the law right in the first place. --- https://imgur.com/bbRWLI8 https:/i.imgur.com/S1m3po4.jpg https://imgur.com/A0BErSV https://imgur.com/7fCcfko <cite>Bio1590 posted [p:929251024] in Twitter bu... [t:78111759]...</cite> <quote>Why are we still supposed to care about this guy. Solid Snake07 posted...</cite> <quote>I know I saw an interview where he was asked if a student of his asked him to use a preferred pronoun he would. He just didnt agree with being forced to by law.</quote> This is wrong, he's literally on-the-record stated that he would refuse to use non-gendered pronouns if requested. And he literally never represented the law right in the first place.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
shnangyboos 10/26/19 12:37:26 AM #54:	Goats posted... How many LGBT people have been driven to near suicide by this guy's hate or his influence? I don't know, do tell us. --- How's my posting? Call http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/182361-human-resource-machine for any comments or concerns. <cite>shnangyboos posted [p:929251078] in Twitter bu... [t:78111759]...</cite> <quote>Goats posted... </cite> <quote>How many LGBT people have been driven to near suicide by this guy's hate or his influence?</quote> I don't know, do tell us. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Bio1590 10/26/19 12:46:17 AM #55:	Solid Snake07 posted... If you can tell me what it is and why it's misrepresented by peterson Im open ears Literally all it did was add "Gender orientation" and "Gender identity" to the Human Rights Code as part of the typical list that includes "race, national or ethnic origin, language, colour, religion, sex, age, mental or physical disability, and sexual orientation" in regards to discrimination, and also added "Gender identity" and "Gender expression" as identifiable groups when it comes to "advocating genocide". The guy literally started ranting and raving about being thrown in prison for misgendering or mislabeling someone based solely on the above...and it was literally never, ever a possibility that he could be. --- https://imgur.com/bbRWLI8 https:/i.imgur.com/S1m3po4.jpg https://imgur.com/A0BErSV https://imgur.com/7fCcfko <cite>Bio1590 posted [p:929251311] in Twitter bu... [t:78111759]...</cite> <quote>Solid Snake07 posted...</cite> <quote> If you can tell me what it is and why it's misrepresented by peterson Im open ears</quote> Literally all it did was add "Gender orientation" and "Gender identity" to the Human Rights Code as part of the typical list that includes "race, national or ethnic origin, language, colour, religion, sex, age, mental or physical disability, and sexual orientation" in regards to discrimination, and also added "Gender identity" and "Gender expression" as identifiable groups when it comes to "advocating genocide". The guy literally started ranting and raving about being thrown in prison for misgendering or mislabeling someone based solely on the above...and it was literally never, ever a possibility that he could be.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Solid Snake07 10/26/19 12:47:28 AM #56:	Bio1590 posted... Why are we still supposed to care about this guy. Solid Snake07 posted... I know I saw an interview where he was asked if a student of his asked him to use a preferred pronoun he would. He just didnt agree with being forced to by law. This is wrong, he's literally on-the-record stated that he would refuse to use non-gendered pronouns if requested. And he literally never represented the law right in the first place. Oh, hes refused to go to the limits of mental illness? Simply calling a biological male she or a biological female he isnt enough. You people are out of your fucking mind. And we all have enough shit going on in our own lives without taking on your baggage you narssasistic fucks. --- "People incapable of guilt usually do have a good time" -Detective Rust Cohle <cite>Solid Snake07 posted [p:929251341] in Twitter bu... [t:78111759]...</cite> <quote>Bio1590 posted...</cite> <quote>Why are we still supposed to care about this guy. Solid Snake07 posted...</cite> <quote>I know I saw an interview where he was asked if a student of his asked him to use a preferred pronoun he would. He just didnt agree with being forced to by law.</quote> This is wrong, he's literally on-the-record stated that he would refuse to use non-gendered pronouns if requested. And he literally never represented the law right in the first place.</quote> Oh, hes refused to go to the limits of mental illness? Simply calling a biological male she or a biological female he isnt enough. You people are out of your fucking mind. And we all have enough shit going on in our own lives without taking on your baggage you narssasistic fucks.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
vigorm0rtis 10/26/19 12:50:41 AM #57:	Solid Snake07 posted... I know I saw an interview where he was asked if a student of his asked him to use a preferred pronoun he would. He just didnt agree with being forced to by law. I also know he's a very politicized public figure that is commonly misrepresented for his actual views. You know when I said "disingenuous" earlier? You strike me as one of those who can't see through it. There are good reasons not to pass those laws-- but it's interesting that Petersen never made one of those arguments. --- "Can't wait to count out your coin!" -- Bethesda, 2018 <cite>vigorm0rtis posted [p:929251423] in Twitter bu... [t:78111759]...</cite> <quote>Solid Snake07 posted...</cite> <quote> I know I saw an interview where he was asked if a student of his asked him to use a preferred pronoun he would. He just didnt agree with being forced to by law. I also know he's a very politicized public figure that is commonly misrepresented for his actual views.</quote> You know when I said "disingenuous" earlier? You strike me as one of those who can't see through it. There are good reasons not to pass those laws-- but it's interesting that Petersen never made one of those arguments.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
averagejoel 10/26/19 12:53:11 AM #58:	Solid Snake07 posted... Im posting on a video game message board slightly drunk on a Friday night. I'm definitely not reading a bill. If you can tell me what it is and why it's misrepresented by peterson Im open ears there's a list of "prohibited grounds of discrimination" -- basically you can't discriminate against someone based on their race, nationality, marital status, etc. the bill added "gender identity" as one of those categories. I don't know if ol' jordy was deliberately lying or legitimately didn't understand the bill, but either way, he was spreading objectively false information about it, based on the idea that it could be used to inhibit free speech or control language in some way --- peanut butter and dick <cite>averagejoel posted [p:929251487] in Twitter bu... [t:78111759]...</cite> <quote>Solid Snake07 posted...</cite> <quote>Im posting on a video game message board slightly drunk on a Friday night. I'm definitely not reading a bill. If you can tell me what it is and why it's misrepresented by peterson Im open ears</quote> there's a list of "prohibited grounds of discrimination" -- basically you can't discriminate against someone based on their race, nationality, marital status, etc. the bill added "gender identity" as one of those categories. I don't know if ol' jordy was deliberately lying or legitimately didn't understand the bill, but either way, he was spreading objectively false information about it, based on the idea that it could be used to inhibit free speech or control language in some way</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
EzeDoesIt 10/26/19 1:01:38 AM #59:	Solid Snake07 posted... Im posting on a video game message board slightly drunk on a Friday night. I'm definitely not reading a bill. If you can tell me what it is and why it's misrepresented by peterson Im open ears Its just extending their anti-discrimination laws to include trans people AKA Jordan Peterson is even dumber than I thought. --- Not changing this sig. <cite>EzeDoesIt posted [p:929251717] in Twitter bu... [t:78111759]...</cite> <quote>Solid Snake07 posted... </cite> <quote>Im posting on a video game message board slightly drunk on a Friday night. I'm definitely not reading a bill. If you can tell me what it is and why it's misrepresented by peterson Im open ears</quote>Its just extending their anti-discrimination laws to include trans people AKA Jordan Peterson is even dumber than I thought. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Solid Snake07 10/26/19 1:01:47 AM #60:	vigorm0rtis posted... Solid Snake07 posted... I know I saw an interview where he was asked if a student of his asked him to use a preferred pronoun he would. He just didnt agree with being forced to by law. I also know he's a very politicized public figure that is commonly misrepresented for his actual views. You know when I said "disingenuous" earlier? You strike me as one of those who can't see through it. There are good reasons not to pass those laws-- but it's interesting that Petersen never made one of those arguments. Maybe. I've had people tell me he took a disingenuous stance on that bill, but I've yet to have anyone break it down for me why he does when pressed, which reeks of bull shit. I guess I could read it myself but I'm not really in the habit of reading foreign legislation.....I dont really care. I care more about people on the internet misrepresenting what someone has said publicly. And ive seen this a gross amount of times with Peterson. I'm not even a big fan of his, but if you have to make up bs about someone to discredit them you've discredited yourself in my eyes. --- "People incapable of guilt usually do have a good time" -Detective Rust Cohle <cite>Solid Snake07 posted [p:929251722] in Twitter bu... [t:78111759]...</cite> <quote>vigorm0rtis posted...</cite> <quote>Solid Snake07 posted...</cite> <quote> I know I saw an interview where he was asked if a student of his asked him to use a preferred pronoun he would. He just didnt agree with being forced to by law. I also know he's a very politicized public figure that is commonly misrepresented for his actual views.</quote> You know when I said "disingenuous" earlier? You strike me as one of those who can't see through it. There are good reasons not to pass those laws-- but it's interesting that Petersen never made one of those arguments.</quote> Maybe. I've had people tell me he took a disingenuous stance on that bill, but I've yet to have anyone break it down for me why he does when pressed, which reeks of bull shit. I guess I could read it myself but I'm not really in the habit of reading foreign legislation.....I dont really care. I care more about people on the internet misrepresenting what someone has said publicly. And ive seen this a gross amount of times with Peterson. I'm not even a big fan of his, but if you have to make up bs about someone to discredit them you've discredited yourself in my eyes.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Solid Snake07 10/26/19 1:03:58 AM #61:	averagejoel posted... Solid Snake07 posted... Im posting on a video game message board slightly drunk on a Friday night. I'm definitely not reading a bill. If you can tell me what it is and why it's misrepresented by peterson Im open ears there's a list of "prohibited grounds of discrimination" -- basically you can't discriminate against someone based on their race, nationality, marital status, etc. the bill added "gender identity" as one of those categories. I don't know if ol' jordy was deliberately lying or legitimately didn't understand the bill, but either way, he was spreading objectively false information about it, based on the idea that it could be used to inhibit free speech or control language in some way So is refusing to call someone by their preferred pronoun discrimination? Cause I'm assuming that was the interpretation of some of the opposition to Peterson --- "People incapable of guilt usually do have a good time" -Detective Rust Cohle <cite>Solid Snake07 posted [p:929251779] in Twitter bu... [t:78111759]...</cite> <quote>averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote>Solid Snake07 posted...</cite> <quote>Im posting on a video game message board slightly drunk on a Friday night. I'm definitely not reading a bill. If you can tell me what it is and why it's misrepresented by peterson Im open ears</quote> there's a list of "prohibited grounds of discrimination" -- basically you can't discriminate against someone based on their race, nationality, marital status, etc. the bill added "gender identity" as one of those categories. I don't know if ol' jordy was deliberately lying or legitimately didn't understand the bill, but either way, he was spreading objectively false information about it, based on the idea that it could be used to inhibit free speech or control language in some way</quote> So is refusing to call someone by their preferred pronoun discrimination? Cause I'm assuming that was the interpretation of some of the opposition to Peterson</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
averagejoel 10/26/19 1:06:31 AM #62:	Solid Snake07 posted... averagejoel posted... Solid Snake07 posted... Im posting on a video game message board slightly drunk on a Friday night. I'm definitely not reading a bill. If you can tell me what it is and why it's misrepresented by peterson Im open ears there's a list of "prohibited grounds of discrimination" -- basically you can't discriminate against someone based on their race, nationality, marital status, etc. the bill added "gender identity" as one of those categories. I don't know if ol' jordy was deliberately lying or legitimately didn't understand the bill, but either way, he was spreading objectively false information about it, based on the idea that it could be used to inhibit free speech or control language in some way So is refusing to call someone by their preferred pronoun discrimination? in certain contexts it could be --- peanut butter and dick <cite>averagejoel posted [p:929251836] in Twitter bu... [t:78111759]...</cite> <quote>Solid Snake07 posted...</cite> <quote>averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote>Solid Snake07 posted...</cite> <quote>Im posting on a video game message board slightly drunk on a Friday night. I'm definitely not reading a bill. If you can tell me what it is and why it's misrepresented by peterson Im open ears</quote> there's a list of "prohibited grounds of discrimination" -- basically you can't discriminate against someone based on their race, nationality, marital status, etc. the bill added "gender identity" as one of those categories. I don't know if ol' jordy was deliberately lying or legitimately didn't understand the bill, but either way, he was spreading objectively false information about it, based on the idea that it could be used to inhibit free speech or control language in some way</quote> So is refusing to call someone by their preferred pronoun discrimination?</quote> in certain contexts it could be</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Solid Snake07 10/26/19 1:07:25 AM #63:	averagejoel posted... Solid Snake07 posted... averagejoel posted... Solid Snake07 posted... Im posting on a video game message board slightly drunk on a Friday night. I'm definitely not reading a bill. If you can tell me what it is and why it's misrepresented by peterson Im open ears there's a list of "prohibited grounds of discrimination" -- basically you can't discriminate against someone based on their race, nationality, marital status, etc. the bill added "gender identity" as one of those categories. I don't know if ol' jordy was deliberately lying or legitimately didn't understand the bill, but either way, he was spreading objectively false information about it, based on the idea that it could be used to inhibit free speech or control language in some way So is refusing to call someone by their preferred pronoun discrimination? in certain contexts it could be So how is that not forced speech? --- "People incapable of guilt usually do have a good time" -Detective Rust Cohle <cite>Solid Snake07 posted [p:929251860] in Twitter bu... [t:78111759]...</cite> <quote>averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote>Solid Snake07 posted...</cite> <quote>averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote>Solid Snake07 posted...</cite> <quote>Im posting on a video game message board slightly drunk on a Friday night. I'm definitely not reading a bill. If you can tell me what it is and why it's misrepresented by peterson Im open ears</quote> there's a list of "prohibited grounds of discrimination" -- basically you can't discriminate against someone based on their race, nationality, marital status, etc. the bill added "gender identity" as one of those categories. I don't know if ol' jordy was deliberately lying or legitimately didn't understand the bill, but either way, he was spreading objectively false information about it, based on the idea that it could be used to inhibit free speech or control language in some way</quote> So is refusing to call someone by their preferred pronoun discrimination?</quote> in certain contexts it could be</quote> So how is that not forced speech?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Polycosm 10/26/19 1:07:51 AM #64:	I haven't listened to much of Peterson's content so I don't know who's wrong here... but I've only ever heard him argue against the gender pronoun law from a free speech standpoint, and I've heard him affirm that he calls people by their preferred pronouns. Also, "clean your room" is a message of personal responsibility-- not a call to bully others. It's one thing to say that Peterson needs to take his own advice. It's another thing to gleefully celebrate the guy's mental breakdown in the face of online harassment. --- I bow before my emperor, Advokaiser-- winner of the 2018 guru contest. (thengamer.com/guru) <cite>Polycosm posted [p:929251877] in Twitter bu... [t:78111759]...</cite> <quote>I haven't listened to much of Peterson's content so I don't know who's wrong here... but I've only ever heard him argue against the gender pronoun law from a free speech standpoint, and I've heard him affirm that he calls people by their preferred pronouns. Also, "clean your room" is a message of personal responsibility-- not a call to bully others. It's one thing to say that Peterson needs to take his own advice. It's another thing to gleefully celebrate the guy's mental breakdown in the face of online harassment.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
EzeDoesIt 10/26/19 1:09:03 AM #65:	Solid Snake07 posted... So how is that not forced speech? Same way hate crime laws against using racial epithets isnt forced speech. --- Not changing this sig. <cite>EzeDoesIt posted [p:929251905] in Twitter bu... [t:78111759]...</cite> <quote>Solid Snake07 posted... </cite> <quote>So how is that not forced speech?</quote> Same way hate crime laws against using racial epithets isnt forced speech. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Solid Snake07 10/26/19 1:11:22 AM #66:	EzeDoesIt posted... Solid Snake07 posted... So how is that not forced speech? Same way hate crime laws against using racial epithets isnt forced speech. Those require an actual crime to take place. I can call someone a racial slur all day long, doing it while I assault them is entirely different thing. You do see the difference there right? --- "People incapable of guilt usually do have a good time" -Detective Rust Cohle <cite>Solid Snake07 posted [p:929251947] in Twitter bu... [t:78111759]...</cite> <quote>EzeDoesIt posted...</cite> <quote>Solid Snake07 posted... </cite> <quote>So how is that not forced speech?</quote> Same way hate crime laws against using racial epithets isnt forced speech. </quote> Those require an actual crime to take place. I can call someone a racial slur all day long, doing it while I assault them is entirely different thing. You do see the difference there right?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
EzeDoesIt 10/26/19 1:13:51 AM #67:	I assumed thats where averagejoels context comes in. --- Not changing this sig. <cite>EzeDoesIt posted [p:929251988] in Twitter bu... [t:78111759]...</cite> <quote>I assumed thats where averagejoels context comes in.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
averagejoel 10/26/19 1:14:20 AM #68:	Solid Snake07 posted... averagejoel posted... Solid Snake07 posted... averagejoel posted... Solid Snake07 posted... Im posting on a video game message board slightly drunk on a Friday night. I'm definitely not reading a bill. If you can tell me what it is and why it's misrepresented by peterson Im open ears there's a list of "prohibited grounds of discrimination" -- basically you can't discriminate against someone based on their race, nationality, marital status, etc. the bill added "gender identity" as one of those categories. I don't know if ol' jordy was deliberately lying or legitimately didn't understand the bill, but either way, he was spreading objectively false information about it, based on the idea that it could be used to inhibit free speech or control language in some way So is refusing to call someone by their preferred pronoun discrimination? in certain contexts it could be So how is that not forced speech? you're gonna need to explain how it is --- peanut butter and dick <cite>averagejoel posted [p:929251999] in Twitter bu... [t:78111759]...</cite> <quote>Solid Snake07 posted...</cite> <quote>averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote>Solid Snake07 posted...</cite> <quote>averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote>Solid Snake07 posted...</cite> <quote>Im posting on a video game message board slightly drunk on a Friday night. I'm definitely not reading a bill. If you can tell me what it is and why it's misrepresented by peterson Im open ears</quote> there's a list of "prohibited grounds of discrimination" -- basically you can't discriminate against someone based on their race, nationality, marital status, etc. the bill added "gender identity" as one of those categories. I don't know if ol' jordy was deliberately lying or legitimately didn't understand the bill, but either way, he was spreading objectively false information about it, based on the idea that it could be used to inhibit free speech or control language in some way</quote> So is refusing to call someone by their preferred pronoun discrimination?</quote> in certain contexts it could be</quote> So how is that not forced speech?</quote> you're gonna need to explain how it is</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
vigorm0rtis 10/26/19 1:18:03 AM #69:	Solid Snake07 posted... EzeDoesIt posted... Solid Snake07 posted... So how is that not forced speech? Same way hate crime laws against using racial epithets isnt forced speech. Those require an actual crime to take place. I can call someone a racial slur all day long, doing it while I assault them is entirely different thing. You do see the difference there right? Article 369 of the Criminal Code, titled 'Incitement to hatred or discrimination', prohibits hate speech directed against a group of persons. The offense carries a punishment of 6 months to 3 years' imprisonment, or a fine. --- "Can't wait to count out your coin!" -- Bethesda, 2018 <cite>vigorm0rtis posted [p:929252079] in Twitter bu... [t:78111759]...</cite> <quote>Solid Snake07 posted...</cite> <quote>EzeDoesIt posted...</cite> <quote>Solid Snake07 posted... </cite> <quote>So how is that not forced speech?</quote> Same way hate crime laws against using racial epithets isnt forced speech. </quote> Those require an actual crime to take place. I can call someone a racial slur all day long, doing it while I assault them is entirely different thing. You do see the difference there right?</quote> Article 369 of the Criminal Code, titled 'Incitement to hatred or discrimination', prohibits hate speech directed against a group of persons. The offense carries a punishment of 6 months to 3 years' imprisonment, or a fine.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Solid Snake07 10/26/19 1:18:29 AM #70:	averagejoel posted... Solid Snake07 posted... averagejoel posted... Solid Snake07 posted... averagejoel posted... Solid Snake07 posted... Im posting on a video game message board slightly drunk on a Friday night. I'm definitely not reading a bill. If you can tell me what it is and why it's misrepresented by peterson Im open ears there's a list of "prohibited grounds of discrimination" -- basically you can't discriminate against someone based on their race, nationality, marital status, etc. the bill added "gender identity" as one of those categories. I don't know if ol' jordy was deliberately lying or legitimately didn't understand the bill, but either way, he was spreading objectively false information about it, based on the idea that it could be used to inhibit free speech or control language in some way So is refusing to call someone by their preferred pronoun discrimination? in certain contexts it could be So how is that not forced speech? you're gonna need to explain how it is No, you need to explain the context that it is or isn't illegal discrimination. --- "People incapable of guilt usually do have a good time" -Detective Rust Cohle <cite>Solid Snake07 posted [p:929252091] in Twitter bu... [t:78111759]...</cite> <quote>averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote>Solid Snake07 posted...</cite> <quote>averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote>Solid Snake07 posted...</cite> <quote>averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote>Solid Snake07 posted...</cite> <quote>Im posting on a video game message board slightly drunk on a Friday night. I'm definitely not reading a bill. If you can tell me what it is and why it's misrepresented by peterson Im open ears</quote> there's a list of "prohibited grounds of discrimination" -- basically you can't discriminate against someone based on their race, nationality, marital status, etc. the bill added "gender identity" as one of those categories. I don't know if ol' jordy was deliberately lying or legitimately didn't understand the bill, but either way, he was spreading objectively false information about it, based on the idea that it could be used to inhibit free speech or control language in some way</quote> So is refusing to call someone by their preferred pronoun discrimination?</quote> in certain contexts it could be</quote> So how is that not forced speech?</quote> you're gonna need to explain how it is</quote> No, you need to explain the context that it is or isn't illegal discrimination.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
averagejoel 10/26/19 1:19:49 AM #71:	Solid Snake07 posted... No, you need to explain the context that it is or isn't illegal discrimination. or you could just read the damn bill lol I'm not a lawyer --- peanut butter and dick <cite>averagejoel posted [p:929252123] in Twitter bu... [t:78111759]...</cite> <quote>Solid Snake07 posted...</cite> <quote>No, you need to explain the context that it is or isn't illegal discrimination.</quote> or you could just read the damn bill lol I'm not a lawyer</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Solid Snake07 10/26/19 1:28:40 AM #72:	averagejoel posted... Solid Snake07 posted... No, you need to explain the context that it is or isn't illegal discrimination. or you could just read the damn bill lol I'm not a lawyer Neither am I and you obviously just admited you haven't read it either(why would you?lol)but I have an unrealistic expectation of straightforward laws that explicitly say what they mean instead of relying on the first judge to rule in high courts to interpret them how they want. Especially when it comes to speech. What a fucked up precident to set. "You cant call me this cause I dont like it!" --- "People incapable of guilt usually do have a good time" -Detective Rust Cohle <cite>Solid Snake07 posted [p:929252293] in Twitter bu... [t:78111759]...</cite> <quote>averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote>Solid Snake07 posted...</cite> <quote>No, you need to explain the context that it is or isn't illegal discrimination.</quote> or you could just read the damn bill lol I'm not a lawyer</quote> Neither am I and you obviously just admited you haven't read it either(why would you?lol)but I have an unrealistic expectation of straightforward laws that explicitly say what they mean instead of relying on the first judge to rule in high courts to interpret them how they want. Especially when it comes to speech. What a fucked up precident to set. "You cant call me this cause I dont like it!"</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
PleaseClap 10/26/19 1:30:57 AM #73:	Canadian Human Rights Act 1 Section 2 of the Canadian Human Rights Act is replaced by the following: Purpose 2 The purpose of this Act is to extend the laws in Canada to give effect, within the purview of matters coming within the legislative authority of Parliament, to the principle that all individuals should have an opportunity equal with other individuals to make for themselves the lives that they are able and wish to have and to have their needs accommodated, consistent with their duties and obligations as members of society, without being hindered in or prevented from doing so by discriminatory practices based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, age, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, marital status, family status, disability or conviction for an offence for which a pardon has been granted or in respect of which a record suspension has been ordered. 2 Subsection 3(1) of the Act is replaced by the following: Prohibited grounds of discrimination 3 (1) For all purposes of this Act, the prohibited grounds of discrimination are race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, age, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, marital status, family status, disability and conviction for an offence for which a pardon has been granted or in respect of which a record suspension has been ordered. Every 3rd Tuesday will now formally be codified as "Taco Tuesday." Citizens who fail to consume at least 2 [two] tacos will be subjected to no less than 15 years imprisonment. Criminal Code 3 Subsection 318(4) of the Criminal Code is replaced by the following: Definition of identifiable group (4) In this section, identifiable group means any section of the public distinguished by colour, race, religion, national or ethnic origin, age, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, or mental or physical disability. 4 Subparagraph 718.2(a)(i) of the Act is replaced by the following: (i) evidence that the offence was motivated by bias, prejudice or hate based on race, national or ethnic origin, language, colour, religion, sex, age, mental or physical disability, sexual orientation, or gender identity or expression, or on any other similar factor, The horror! --- she/her https://imgur.com/AmWcJjM <cite>PleaseClap posted [p:929252340] in Twitter bu... [t:78111759]...</cite> <quote>Canadian Human Rights Act 1 Section 2 of the Canadian Human Rights Act is replaced by the following: Purpose 2 The purpose of this Act is to extend the laws in Canada to give effect, within the purview of matters coming within the legislative authority of Parliament, to the principle that all individuals should have an opportunity equal with other individuals to make for themselves the lives that they are able and wish to have and to have their needs accommodated, consistent with their duties and obligations as members of society, without being hindered in or prevented from doing so by discriminatory practices based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, age, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, marital status, family status, disability or conviction for an offence for which a pardon has been granted or in respect of which a record suspension has been ordered. 2 Subsection 3(1) of the Act is replaced by the following: Prohibited grounds of discrimination 3 (1) For all purposes of this Act, the prohibited grounds of discrimination are race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, age, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, marital status, family status, disability and conviction for an offence for which a pardon has been granted or in respect of which a record suspension has been ordered. Every 3rd Tuesday will now formally be codified as "Taco Tuesday." Citizens who fail to consume at least 2 [two] tacos will be subjected to no less than 15 years imprisonment. Criminal Code 3 Subsection 318(4) of the Criminal Code is replaced by the following: Definition of identifiable group (4) In this section, identifiable group means any section of the public distinguished by colour, race, religion, national or ethnic origin, age, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, or mental or physical disability. 4 Subparagraph 718.2(a)(i) of the Act is replaced by the following: (i) evidence that the offence was motivated by bias, prejudice or hate based on race, national or ethnic origin, language, colour, religion, sex, age, mental or physical disability, sexual orientation, or gender identity or expression, or on any other similar factor, The horror!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
averagejoel 10/26/19 1:57:07 AM #74:	Solid Snake07 posted... Neither am I and you obviously just admited you haven't read it either I literally did, and I literally explained it to you, but you insist on being dense about it --- peanut butter and dick <cite>averagejoel posted [p:929252850] in Twitter bu... [t:78111759]...</cite> <quote>Solid Snake07 posted...</cite> <quote>Neither am I and you obviously just admited you haven't read it either</quote> I literally did, and I literally explained it to you, but you insist on being dense about it</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ReignFury 10/26/19 1:58:20 AM #75:	Wow, a lot of supporters regularly use his arguments to claim victimhood and attack women and/or minorities and I can see them turning on him for breaking like this. Im a fan if his but I don't do the MGTOW redd pill stuff, I reflect on a lot of his viewpoints and it helps me focus more on my own path and less on anything else. To me hes not a hero or a guru, hes simply a resource for self improvement and progression. --- Say auf Wiedersehen to your Nazi balls https://tinyurl.com/y52lxcv2 https://imgur.com/ckMyHXv <cite>ReignFury posted [p:929252876] in Twitter bu... [t:78111759]...</cite> <quote>Wow, a lot of supporters regularly use his arguments to claim victimhood and attack women and/or minorities and I can see them turning on him for breaking like this. Im a fan if his but I don't do the MGTOW redd pill stuff, I reflect on a lot of his viewpoints and it helps me focus more on my own path and less on anything else. To me hes not a hero or a guru, hes simply a resource for self improvement and progression.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Joelypoely 10/26/19 2:36:23 AM #76:	awesome999 posted... That article reads in a way that suggests the author is inherently biased --- https://philoetryblog.wordpress.com/ <cite>Joelypoely posted [p:929253524] in Twitter bu... [t:78111759]...</cite> <quote>awesome999 posted...</cite> <quote>That article reads in a way that suggests the author is inherently biased</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Disengaged 10/26/19 3:00:33 AM #77:	Time to dissolve and regrow your brain petey. --- This is my signature. You read my signature. It sucked. <cite>Disengaged posted [p:929253909] in Twitter bu... [t:78111759]...</cite> <quote>Time to dissolve and regrow your brain petey.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Bio1590 10/26/19 3:19:21 AM #78:	Jesus Christ imagine admitting you refuse to read something and then still trying to argue with someone over whether someone else's interpretation of it is wrong or not. --- https://imgur.com/bbRWLI8 https:/i.imgur.com/S1m3po4.jpg https://imgur.com/A0BErSV https://imgur.com/7fCcfko <cite>Bio1590 posted [p:929254238] in Twitter bu... [t:78111759]...</cite> <quote>Jesus Christ imagine admitting you refuse to read something and then still trying to argue with someone over whether someone else's interpretation of it is wrong or not.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ssjevot 10/26/19 3:35:38 AM #79:	kingdrake2 posted... it's even nastier than alcohol abuse. wish him the best in trying to overcome it. if only those cops would go after those goddamn dealers... gotta take out the hydra somehow. Wouldn't his dealer in this scenario be the Canadian healthcare system? --- Favorite Games: BlazBlue: Central Fiction, Street Fighter III: Third Strike, Bayonetta, Bloodborne thats a username you habe - chuckyhacksss <cite>ssjevot posted [p:929254479] in Twitter bu... [t:78111759]...</cite> <quote>kingdrake2 posted... </cite> <quote>it's even nastier than alcohol abuse. wish him the best in trying to overcome it. if only those cops would go after those goddamn dealers... gotta take out the hydra somehow.</quote> Wouldn't his dealer in this scenario be the Canadian healthcare system? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Blue_Dream87 10/26/19 4:11:48 AM #80:	I think the dude is shitty and is just another grifters taking advantage of this "culture war". However, online harassment is also shitty and toxic, and ridiculing a drug addict for getting help is not something society should normalize. He was stupid enough to try and quit a Klonopin addiction cold turkey, I think he's suffered enough from his own devices. Keep up the criticism but remember we're all human --- <cite>Blue_Dream87 posted [p:929254968] in Twitter bu... [t:78111759]...</cite> <quote>I think the dude is shitty and is just another grifters taking advantage of this "culture war". However, online harassment is also shitty and toxic, and ridiculing a drug addict for getting help is not something society should normalize. He was stupid enough to try and quit a Klonopin addiction cold turkey, I think he's suffered enough from his own devices. Keep up the criticism but remember we're all human </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MrMallard 10/26/19 5:20:37 AM #81:	Solid Snake07 posted... averagejoel posted... Solid Snake07 posted... averagejoel posted... Solid Snake07 posted... Im posting on a video game message board slightly drunk on a Friday night. I'm definitely not reading a bill. If you can tell me what it is and why it's misrepresented by peterson Im open ears there's a list of "prohibited grounds of discrimination" -- basically you can't discriminate against someone based on their race, nationality, marital status, etc. the bill added "gender identity" as one of those categories. I don't know if ol' jordy was deliberately lying or legitimately didn't understand the bill, but either way, he was spreading objectively false information about it, based on the idea that it could be used to inhibit free speech or control language in some way So is refusing to call someone by their preferred pronoun discrimination? in certain contexts it could be So how is that not forced speech? You greet a person using masculine pronouns because they strike you as being masculine - an especially manly woman, or a trans woman, for example. This person tells you that they identify with these feminine pronouns. If you continue to use masculine pronouns for them with this information, in the face of them correcting you, it can be argued that you're being hostile given the context of this exchange. No-one's gonna throw you into a gulag for misgendering someone off the bat, but if they say "actually I go by these pronouns" and you keep calling them "sir" or "ma'am" in the face of these clear requests, then you're probably gonna get slapped with discrimination. Maybe you're the sort of person who's had to budge on certain things your brain hardwires in without your control. If you can make a decent case of operating in good faith, then maybe everything will be good. But if you're spending your time jabbing at people based on their gender identification, you might be held liable for discriminating against them. --- And I am done with my graceless heart, so tonight I'm gonna cut it out and then restart Now Playing: Yakuza 5, Final Fantasy X-2, Minecraft <cite>MrMallard posted [p:929255812] in Twitter bu... [t:78111759]...</cite> <quote>Solid Snake07 posted...</cite> <quote>averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote>Solid Snake07 posted...</cite> <quote>averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote>Solid Snake07 posted...</cite> <quote>Im posting on a video game message board slightly drunk on a Friday night. I'm definitely not reading a bill. If you can tell me what it is and why it's misrepresented by peterson Im open ears</quote> there's a list of "prohibited grounds of discrimination" -- basically you can't discriminate against someone based on their race, nationality, marital status, etc. the bill added "gender identity" as one of those categories. I don't know if ol' jordy was deliberately lying or legitimately didn't understand the bill, but either way, he was spreading objectively false information about it, based on the idea that it could be used to inhibit free speech or control language in some way</quote> So is refusing to call someone by their preferred pronoun discrimination?</quote> in certain contexts it could be</quote> So how is that not forced speech?</quote> You greet a person using masculine pronouns because they strike you as being masculine - an especially manly woman, or a trans woman, for example. This person tells you that they identify with these feminine pronouns. If you continue to use masculine pronouns for them with this information, in the face of them correcting you, it can be argued that you're being hostile given the context of this exchange. No-one's gonna throw you into a gulag for misgendering someone off the bat, but if they say "actually I go by these pronouns" and you keep calling them "sir" or "ma'am" in the face of these clear requests, then you're probably gonna get slapped with discrimination. Maybe you're the sort of person who's had to budge on certain things your brain hardwires in without your control. If you can make a decent case of operating in good faith, then maybe everything will be good. But if you're spending your time jabbing at people based on their gender identification, you might be held liable for discriminating against them.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MrMallard 10/26/19 5:24:33 AM #82:	Bio1590 posted... Jesus Christ imagine admitting you refuse to read something and then still trying to argue with someone over whether someone else's interpretation of it is wrong or not. Because it doesn't matter if you're right or wrong. As long as you're always on the attack, you maintain a dominant image and people can claim you won because you never budged to the opposition. It doesn't matter about the content of the message, because the tone of the exchange matters much more to a conservative pundit's followers. See: the Ben Shapiro interview where he clashed with a British conservative and called it a debate --- And I am done with my graceless heart, so tonight I'm gonna cut it out and then restart Now Playing: Yakuza 5, Final Fantasy X-2, Minecraft <cite>MrMallard posted [p:929255857] in Twitter bu... [t:78111759]...</cite> <quote>Bio1590 posted...</cite> <quote>Jesus Christ imagine admitting you refuse to read something and then still trying to argue with someone over whether someone else's interpretation of it is wrong or not.</quote> Because it doesn't matter if you're right or wrong. As long as you're always on the attack, you maintain a dominant image and people can claim you won because you never budged to the opposition. It doesn't matter about the content of the message, because the tone of the exchange matters much more to a conservative pundit's followers. See: the Ben Shapiro interview where he clashed with a British conservative and called it a debate</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Lorenzo_2003 10/26/19 5:37:13 AM #83:	Garioshi posted... On one hand, he's human and it's only natural for him to be affected by this sort of thing. On the other hand, if you can't walk the walk, don't talk the talk. That take does not make sense, given what we know of Jordan Peterson. To the best of my knowledge, Peterson has never claimed to be a tough guy, or an "Alpha" as some would say. In fact, he has cried before during public speeches, media interviews and at least one vlog. I don't even think he's ever even said that online criticism and such does not have an impact on him. He's been supportive of viewers and patients who have admitted they are suicidal, depressed, mentally ill or generally struggling. This is not a guy who dismisses people's personal pain, but he does seem very wary of anyone who is pro censorship or pro violence. Again, Peterson is not the type to claim he is a tough guy who would never cry or admit defeat in some way. He's always struck me as a bit effeminate, maybe what older generations would call a dandy. --- ... <cite>Lorenzo_2003 posted [p:929256008] in Twitter bu... [t:78111759]...</cite> <quote>Garioshi posted...</cite> <quote>On one hand, he's human and it's only natural for him to be affected by this sort of thing. On the other hand, if you can't walk the walk, don't talk the talk.</quote> That take does not make sense, given what we know of Jordan Peterson. To the best of my knowledge, Peterson has never claimed to be a tough guy, or an "Alpha" as some would say. In fact, he has cried before during public speeches, media interviews and at least one vlog. I don't even think he's ever even said that online criticism and such does not have an impact on him. He's been supportive of viewers and patients who have admitted they are suicidal, depressed, mentally ill or generally struggling. This is not a guy who dismisses people's personal pain, but he does seem very wary of anyone who is pro censorship or pro violence. Again, Peterson is not the type to claim he is a tough guy who would never cry or admit defeat in some way. He's always struck me as a bit effeminate, maybe what older generations would call a dandy.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
EzeDoesIt 10/26/19 7:00:11 AM #84:	Lorenzo_2003 posted... Garioshi posted... On one hand, he's human and it's only natural for him to be affected by this sort of thing. On the other hand, if you can't walk the walk, don't talk the talk. That take does not make sense, given what we know of Jordan Peterson. To the best of my knowledge, Peterson has never claimed to be a tough guy, or an "Alpha" as some would say. In fact, he has cried before during public speeches, media interviews and at least one vlog. I don't even think he's ever even said that online criticism and such does not have an impact on him. He's been supportive of viewers and patients who have admitted they are suicidal, depressed, mentally ill or generally struggling. This is not a guy who dismisses people's personal pain, but he does seem very wary of anyone who is pro censorship or pro violence. Again, Peterson is not the type to claim he is a tough guy who would never cry or admit defeat in some way. He's always struck me as a bit effeminate, maybe what older generations would call a dandy. this is accurate --- Not changing this sig. <cite>EzeDoesIt posted [p:929256959] in Twitter bu... [t:78111759]...</cite> <quote>Lorenzo_2003 posted...</cite> <quote>Garioshi posted...</cite> <quote>On one hand, he's human and it's only natural for him to be affected by this sort of thing. On the other hand, if you can't walk the walk, don't talk the talk.</quote> That take does not make sense, given what we know of Jordan Peterson. To the best of my knowledge, Peterson has never claimed to be a tough guy, or an "Alpha" as some would say. In fact, he has cried before during public speeches, media interviews and at least one vlog. I don't even think he's ever even said that online criticism and such does not have an impact on him. He's been supportive of viewers and patients who have admitted they are suicidal, depressed, mentally ill or generally struggling. This is not a guy who dismisses people's personal pain, but he does seem very wary of anyone who is pro censorship or pro violence. Again, Peterson is not the type to claim he is a tough guy who would never cry or admit defeat in some way. He's always struck me as a bit effeminate, maybe what older generations would call a dandy.</quote> this is accurate</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
averagejoel 10/26/19 2:03:03 PM #85:	MrMallard posted... You greet a person using masculine pronouns because they strike you as being masculine while the rest of your post is perfectly fine, I find this puzzling -- when greeting someone, people generally use the pronoun "you", which is not gendered in English. in what context would you refer to someone as "he" or "she" when greeting them? --- peanut butter and dick <cite>averagejoel posted [p:929267332] in Twitter bu... [t:78111759]...</cite> <quote>MrMallard posted...</cite> <quote>You greet a person using masculine pronouns because they strike you as being masculine</quote> while the rest of your post is perfectly fine, I find this puzzling -- when greeting someone, people generally use the pronoun "you", which is not gendered in English. in what context would you refer to someone as "he" or "she" when greeting them?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
EzeDoesIt 10/26/19 2:53:05 PM #86:	averagejoel posted... MrMallard posted... You greet a person using masculine pronouns because they strike you as being masculine while the rest of your post is perfectly fine, I find this puzzling -- when greeting someone, people generally use the pronoun "you", which is not gendered in English. in what context would you refer to someone as "he" or "she" when greeting them? The main way I could see it is working in the service industry and calling someone maam/miss vs. sir. But it was pretty rare that I used those terms when I worked in the service industry anyway. --- Not changing this sig. <cite>EzeDoesIt posted [p:929269074] in Twitter bu... [t:78111759]...</cite> <quote>averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote>MrMallard posted...</cite> <quote>You greet a person using masculine pronouns because they strike you as being masculine</quote> while the rest of your post is perfectly fine, I find this puzzling -- when greeting someone, people generally use the pronoun "you", which is not gendered in English. in what context would you refer to someone as "he" or "she" when greeting them?</quote> The main way I could see it is working in the service industry and calling someone maam/miss vs. sir. But it was pretty rare that I used those terms when I worked in the service industry anyway.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Machete 10/26/19 2:54:38 PM #87:	Jordan Peterson is basically a fart festival --- https://talktotransformer.com The Internet is kind of the whole ****ing Internet. <cite>Machete posted [p:929269130] in Twitter bu... [t:78111759]...</cite> <quote>Jordan Peterson is basically a fart festival</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hockeybub89 10/26/19 2:55:36 PM #88:	wtf now it's okay to cry --- http://card.psnprofiles.com/1/NIR_Hockey.png http://www.last.fm/user/hockeybub89/ <cite>hockeybub89 posted [p:929269185] in Twitter bu... [t:78111759]...</cite> <quote>wtf now it's okay to cry</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
averagejoel 10/26/19 3:03:34 PM #89:	EzeDoesIt posted... averagejoel posted... MrMallard posted... You greet a person using masculine pronouns because they strike you as being masculine while the rest of your post is perfectly fine, I find this puzzling -- when greeting someone, people generally use the pronoun "you", which is not gendered in English. in what context would you refer to someone as "he" or "she" when greeting them? The main way I could see it is working in the service industry and calling someone maam/miss vs. sir. But it was pretty rare that I used those terms when I worked in the service industry anyway. those aren't pronouns though. they're honorifics --- peanut butter and dick <cite>averagejoel posted [p:929269509] in Twitter bu... [t:78111759]...</cite> <quote>EzeDoesIt posted...</cite> <quote>averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote>MrMallard posted...</cite> <quote>You greet a person using masculine pronouns because they strike you as being masculine</quote> while the rest of your post is perfectly fine, I find this puzzling -- when greeting someone, people generally use the pronoun "you", which is not gendered in English. in what context would you refer to someone as "he" or "she" when greeting them?</quote> The main way I could see it is working in the service industry and calling someone maam/miss vs. sir. But it was pretty rare that I used those terms when I worked in the service industry anyway.</quote> those aren't pronouns though. they're honorifics</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
EzeDoesIt 10/26/19 3:05:40 PM #90:	Sure but insisting on calling a man maam or a woman sir is probably going to offend them. --- Not changing this sig. <cite>EzeDoesIt posted [p:929269587] in Twitter bu... [t:78111759]...</cite> <quote>Sure but insisting on calling a man maam or a woman sir is probably going to offend them.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
averagejoel 10/26/19 3:15:14 PM #91:	EzeDoesIt posted... Sure but insisting on calling a man maam or a woman sir is probably going to offend them. yeah but I was asking specifically about pronouns --- peanut butter and dick <cite>averagejoel posted [p:929269946] in Twitter bu... [t:78111759]...</cite> <quote>EzeDoesIt posted...</cite> <quote>Sure but insisting on calling a man maam or a woman sir is probably going to offend them.</quote> yeah but I was asking specifically about pronouns</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
EzeDoesIt 10/26/19 3:48:34 PM #92:	averagejoel posted... EzeDoesIt posted... Sure but insisting on calling a man maam or a woman sir is probably going to offend them. yeah but I was asking specifically about pronouns Oh well yeah I agree youd be hard-pressed to refer to someone in the 3rd person when speaking directly to them. --- Not changing this sig. <cite>EzeDoesIt posted [p:929271147] in Twitter bu... [t:78111759]...</cite> <quote>averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote>EzeDoesIt posted...</cite> <quote>Sure but insisting on calling a man maam or a woman sir is probably going to offend them.</quote> yeah but I was asking specifically about pronouns</quote> Oh well yeah I agree youd be hard-pressed to refer to someone in the 3rd person when speaking directly to them.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
mybbqrules 10/26/19 7:04:18 PM #93:	Jordan Peterson: I'm anti-PC! Tell it like it is! No snowflakes allowed! Also Jordan Peterson: Stop making fun of me BWUH HUH HUH HUUUUUUUH. --- "Remember, it's called the 'American dream' because you have to be asleep to believe it." - George Carlin <cite>mybbqrules posted [p:929278047] in Twitter bu... [t:78111759]...</cite> <quote>Jordan Peterson: I'm anti-PC! Tell it like it is! No snowflakes allowed! Also Jordan Peterson: Stop making fun of me BWUH HUH HUH HUUUUUUUH.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Notti 10/28/19 5:53:59 AM #94:	https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rAlTOfl9F2w" data-time=" --- https://youtube.com/TheYoungTurks http://RightWingWatch.org/ https://youtube.com/CodyJohnston https://reddit.com/r/The_Mueller https://reddit.com/r/BreadTube <cite>Notti posted [p:929334040] in Twitter bu... [t:78111759]...</cite> <quote> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rAlTOfl9F2w" data-time="</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
iPhone_7 10/28/19 6:01:39 AM #95:	I dont like the guy but I dont think its hypocritical of him to be upset. From what I know of him he says anti-pc stuff in general, not gang up with others to specifically target an individual. --- Sig User Logic https://imgur.com/lA5fm7w <cite>iPhone_7 posted [p:929334124] in Twitter bu... [t:78111759]...</cite> <quote>I dont like the guy but I dont think its hypocritical of him to be upset. From what I know of him he says anti-pc stuff in general, not gang up with others to specifically target an individual.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tyranthraxus 10/28/19 4:33:16 PM #96:	iPhone_7 posted... I dont like the guy but I dont think its hypocritical of him to be upset. From what I know of him he says anti-pc stuff in general, not gang up with others to specifically target an individual. The "anti-pc" stuff is really just a "pc" way of saying "minorities should be subjected to whatever derogatory words the majority wants to call them" He's not organizing gangs. The gang is already there. --- It says right here in Matthew 16:4 "Jesus doth not need a giant Mecha." https://imgur.com/dQgC4kv <cite>Tyranthraxus posted [p:929353130] in Twitter bu... [t:78111759]...</cite> <quote>iPhone_7 posted... </cite> <quote>I dont like the guy but I dont think its hypocritical of him to be upset. From what I know of him he says anti-pc stuff in general, not gang up with others to specifically target an individual.</quote> The "anti-pc" stuff is really just a "pc" way of saying "minorities should be subjected to whatever derogatory words the majority wants to call them" He's not organizing gangs. The gang is already there. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkphoenix181 10/28/19 4:35:19 PM #97:	BignutzisBack posted... Yes she almost died and he was on anxiety medication for it. She then made a recovery and he tried to wean off and had bad withdrawal symptoms so he checked himself into rehab. A mob of absolute fucking losers got off on this and started mocking him for it and now here we are Wow. If this is in regards to his wife dying then that is not nice. And look at CEmen saying they are happy about it... <cite>darkphoenix181 posted [p:929353221] in Twitter bu... [t:78111759]...</cite> <quote>BignutzisBack posted... </cite> <quote>Yes she almost died and he was on anxiety medication for it. She then made a recovery and he tried to wean off and had bad withdrawal symptoms so he checked himself into rehab. A mob of absolute fucking losers got off on this and started mocking him for it and now here we are</quote> Wow. If this is in regards to his wife dying then that is not nice. And look at CEmen saying they are happy about it... </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Archibleedies 10/28/19 4:40:01 PM #98:	noted irl dick gets treated like he's a dick, cries --- Hairistotle <cite>Archibleedies posted [p:929353404] in Twitter bu... [t:78111759]...</cite> <quote>noted irl dick gets treated like he's a dick, cries</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
EverDownward 10/28/19 4:47:01 PM #99:	He has my sympathies in that drug addiction, mental or physical, is fucking horrific and I sincerely hope he manages to overcome it. --- take me somewhere nice <cite>EverDownward posted [p:929353658] in Twitter bu... [t:78111759]...</cite> <quote>He has my sympathies in that drug addiction, mental or physical, is fucking horrific and I sincerely hope he manages to overcome it.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Esrac 10/28/19 4:57:31 PM #100:	I don't really care for his big following, but I kind of get how he would appeal to aimless young men. I also don't get the back lash against him, but I don't think I've heard much from him that I would consider particularly objectionable. He uses a bit too much metaphor though. --- http://steamcommunity.com/id/Esrac/wishlist/ <cite>Esrac posted [p:929354083] in Twitter bu... [t:78111759]...</cite> <quote>I don't really care for his big following, but I kind of get how he would appeal to aimless young men. I also don't get the back lash against him, but I don't think I've heard much from him that I would consider particularly objectionable. He uses a bit too much metaphor though.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3

Current Events > Twitter bullies brought Jordan Peterson to tears. (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Twitter bullies brought Jordan Peterson to tears.