Current Events > ew, why am I getting Jordan Peterson videos in my YouTube recommendations?

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2
thrashmetal14 09/15/19 12:12:52 AM #51:	berlyman101 posted... So the bill is including trans people in its hate crime laws? So Peterson says that means he could be punished by law for not using the preferred pronoun of someone because it could be interpreted, reported, and tried as a hate crime, and he could be fined and since he would refuse to pay or do community service or whatever, he could be jailed? Therefore, he would be forced at all times by law to say what someone else wants, therefore the government is forcing him to use certain language he "finds detestable," which he never articulates iirc, therefore trampling on his and everyone else's free speech and threatening to come for him with government thugs which are in cahoots with the universities which are run by postmodern neomarxists in a grand conspiracy meant to force us to use nongendered pronouns and destroy our families? I dunno, seems like a bit of a stretch. You realize Canada is a country that literally fined a comedian for making an offensive joke, right? I dont understand what people dont understand about JP's issue with the law. <cite>thrashmetal14 posted [p:927452756] in ew, why am... [t:78013337]...</cite> <quote>berlyman101 posted... </cite> <quote>So the bill is including trans people in its hate crime laws? So Peterson says that means he could be punished by law for not using the preferred pronoun of someone because it could be interpreted, reported, and tried as a hate crime, and he could be fined and since he would refuse to pay or do community service or whatever, he could be jailed? Therefore, he would be forced at all times by law to say what someone else wants, therefore the government is forcing him to use certain language he "finds detestable," which he never articulates iirc, therefore trampling on his and everyone else's free speech and threatening to come for him with government thugs which are in cahoots with the universities which are run by postmodern neomarxists in a grand conspiracy meant to force us to use nongendered pronouns and destroy our families? I dunno, seems like a bit of a stretch.</quote> You realize Canada is a country that literally fined a comedian for making an offensive joke, right? I dont understand what people dont understand about JP's issue with the law. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MC_BatCommander 09/15/19 2:03:34 AM #52:	thrashmetal14 posted... Jordan Peterson is both smarter and wiser than the haters in this topic. Thats all I have to say. what a hot take! --- The Legend is True! <cite>MC_BatCommander posted [p:927456185] in ew, why am... [t:78013337]...</cite> <quote>thrashmetal14 posted...</cite> <quote>Jordan Peterson is both smarter and wiser than the haters in this topic. Thats all I have to say. </quote> what a hot take!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
The Great Muta 22 09/15/19 2:28:41 AM #53:	BignutzisBack posted... It's amazing how easily Peterson gets people frothing at the mouth lol Why do you guys all think that if someone doesn't like or makes fun of the random YouTube "debater" that gets trotted out it suddenly means they are either enraged or afraid of them or something? What ever happened to just mocking something? Like with JP. I think his anagolgies are stupid and he sounds and looks like a complete meandering dork, and his fanboys treat him like a cult leader. Thus I make fun of him. If others like him then cool, I don't give a shit either way and will still mock him. --- https://youtu.be/rYy0o-J0x20?t=300 "Thank you, good night. I hope you're happy" <cite>The Great Muta 22 posted [p:927456799] in ew, why am... [t:78013337]...</cite> <quote>BignutzisBack posted...</cite> <quote>It's amazing how easily Peterson gets people frothing at the mouth lol </quote> Why do you guys all think that if someone doesn't like or makes fun of the random YouTube "debater" that gets trotted out it suddenly means they are either enraged or afraid of them or something? What ever happened to just mocking something? Like with JP. I think his anagolgies are stupid and he sounds and looks like a complete meandering dork, and his fanboys treat him like a cult leader. Thus I make fun of him. If others like him then cool, I don't give a shit either way and will still mock him.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
evil_zombie11 09/15/19 2:41:59 AM #54:	thrashmetal14 posted... berlyman101 posted... So the bill is including trans people in its hate crime laws? So Peterson says that means he could be punished by law for not using the preferred pronoun of someone because it could be interpreted, reported, and tried as a hate crime, and he could be fined and since he would refuse to pay or do community service or whatever, he could be jailed? Therefore, he would be forced at all times by law to say what someone else wants, therefore the government is forcing him to use certain language he "finds detestable," which he never articulates iirc, therefore trampling on his and everyone else's free speech and threatening to come for him with government thugs which are in cahoots with the universities which are run by postmodern neomarxists in a grand conspiracy meant to force us to use nongendered pronouns and destroy our families? I dunno, seems like a bit of a stretch. You realize Canada is a country that literally fined a comedian for making an offensive joke, right? I dont understand what people dont understand about JP's issue with the law. Their hearts are in the right place, as in the law protecting people. But that law can be easily abused. --- Yo wtf Probably lifting or running... <cite>evil_zombie11 posted [p:927457099] in ew, why am... [t:78013337]...</cite> <quote>thrashmetal14 posted...</cite> <quote>berlyman101 posted... </cite> <quote>So the bill is including trans people in its hate crime laws? So Peterson says that means he could be punished by law for not using the preferred pronoun of someone because it could be interpreted, reported, and tried as a hate crime, and he could be fined and since he would refuse to pay or do community service or whatever, he could be jailed? Therefore, he would be forced at all times by law to say what someone else wants, therefore the government is forcing him to use certain language he "finds detestable," which he never articulates iirc, therefore trampling on his and everyone else's free speech and threatening to come for him with government thugs which are in cahoots with the universities which are run by postmodern neomarxists in a grand conspiracy meant to force us to use nongendered pronouns and destroy our families? I dunno, seems like a bit of a stretch.</quote> You realize Canada is a country that literally fined a comedian for making an offensive joke, right? I dont understand what people dont understand about JP's issue with the law. </quote> Their hearts are in the right place, as in the law protecting people. But that law can be easily abused.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
omega cookie 09/15/19 2:43:46 AM #55:	The Great Muta 22 posted... BignutzisBack posted... It's amazing how easily Peterson gets people frothing at the mouth lol Why do you guys all think that if someone doesn't like or makes fun of the random YouTube "debater" that gets trotted out it suddenly means they are either enraged or afraid of them or something? What ever happened to just mocking something? Like with JP. I think his anagolgies are stupid and he sounds and looks like a complete meandering dork, and his fanboys treat him like a cult leader. Thus I make fun of him. If others like him then cool, I don't give a shit either way and will still mock him. Good Christ, pot and kettle here. --- FFRK: BRKB - Eiko - Guardian Mog <cite>omega cookie posted [p:927457120] in ew, why am... [t:78013337]...</cite> <quote>The Great Muta 22 posted...</cite> <quote>BignutzisBack posted...</cite> <quote>It's amazing how easily Peterson gets people frothing at the mouth lol </quote> Why do you guys all think that if someone doesn't like or makes fun of the random YouTube "debater" that gets trotted out it suddenly means they are either enraged or afraid of them or something? What ever happened to just mocking something? Like with JP. I think his anagolgies are stupid and he sounds and looks like a complete meandering dork, and his fanboys treat him like a cult leader. Thus I make fun of him. If others like him then cool, I don't give a shit either way and will still mock him.</quote> Good Christ, pot and kettle here.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Shadow20201 09/15/19 8:09:46 AM #56:	evil_zombie11 posted... Their hearts are in the right place, as in the law protecting people. But that law can be easily abused Jessica Yaniv, for example. --- czzzzzzzzzz[]:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::/ 'Sir we are surrounded!' 'Excellent, then we can attack in any direction.' <cite>Shadow20201 posted [p:927462208] in ew, why am... [t:78013337]...</cite> <quote>evil_zombie11 posted...</cite> <quote>Their hearts are in the right place, as in the law protecting people. But that law can be easily abused</quote> Jessica Yaniv, for example.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Evening_Dragon 09/15/19 8:24:04 AM #57:	He never once explains the science behind the masculine/feminine dynamic he likes to tout. Not once. It's stuff that sounds good to directionless young men, but none of them can tell me the scientific theory at work here, and neither can Peterson. --- "A guy talking into the camera about politics? My favorite." - Phantom_Nook Guide, it's Guide, it's that Guide <cite>Evening_Dragon posted [p:927462460] in ew, why am... [t:78013337]...</cite> <quote>He never once explains the science behind the masculine/feminine dynamic he likes to tout. Not once. It's stuff that sounds good to directionless young men, but none of them can tell me the scientific theory at work here, and neither can Peterson.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
user-2 09/15/19 8:33:39 AM #58:	I never understood people above 10 years old who use "eww" <cite>user-2 posted [p:927462659] in ew, why am... [t:78013337]...</cite> <quote>I never understood people above 10 years old who use "eww"</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
averagejoel 09/15/19 9:00:20 AM #59:	Sad_Face posted... averagejoel posted... do you think this might have had something to do with society ostracizing women if they didn't conform to an arbitrary standard and act exactly as the men in power wanted them to? No. I just think it's biological differences that give men the advantage. If the only jobs available were physical labor, men are going to have the leg up. Though I say this, as you said, the power the leads have determine the dynamics of the culture. I hear when the first set of Europeans came to the New World, a good number of them, both young men and women, defected to Native American tribes due to power and authority being more balanced in their communities. For instance, women in the tribes had much more autonomy than in the early settlements and each person in the tribe had to contribute, which in turn gave them a stronger sense of purpose. You seem to have an opinion on this already that you were alluding to so please, elaborate. factually, a society ostracizing women if they didn't conform to an arbitrary standard and act exactly as the men in power wanted them to, has a significant effect on the jobs that women can do. you are incorrect to assert otherwise. --- peanut butter and dick <cite>averagejoel posted [p:927463205] in ew, why am... [t:78013337]...</cite> <quote>Sad_Face posted...</cite> <quote>averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote>do you think this might have had something to do with society ostracizing women if they didn't conform to an arbitrary standard and act exactly as the men in power wanted them to?</quote> No. I just think it's biological differences that give men the advantage. If the only jobs available were physical labor, men are going to have the leg up. Though I say this, as you said, the power the leads have determine the dynamics of the culture. I hear when the first set of Europeans came to the New World, a good number of them, both young men and women, defected to Native American tribes due to power and authority being more balanced in their communities. For instance, women in the tribes had much more autonomy than in the early settlements and each person in the tribe had to contribute, which in turn gave them a stronger sense of purpose. You seem to have an opinion on this already that you were alluding to so please, elaborate.</quote> factually, a society ostracizing women if they didn't conform to an arbitrary standard and act exactly as the men in power wanted them to, has a significant effect on the jobs that women can do. you are incorrect to assert otherwise.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
1337toothbrush 09/15/19 10:41:49 AM #60:	user-2 posted... I never understood people above 10 years old who use "eww" It's an expression of disgust. Do you also not understand people above 10 years old who use "ow"? --- https://imgur.com/a/FU9H8 https://imgur.com/ZkQRDsR - https://imgur.com/2x2gtgP <cite>1337toothbrush posted [p:927465554] in ew, why am... [t:78013337]...</cite> <quote>user-2 posted...</cite> <quote>I never understood people above 10 years old who use "eww"</quote> It's an expression of disgust. Do you also not understand people above 10 years old who use "ow"?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
sevihaimerej 09/15/19 10:45:41 AM #61:	Evening_Dragon posted... He never once explains the science behind the masculine/feminine dynamic he likes to tout. Not once. It's stuff that sounds good to directionless young men, but none of them can tell me the scientific theory at work here, and neither can Peterson. He's talking about pre-established mythos, none of it is really his own original thoughts. He associates the feminine with the passive and chaotic in his talks because the mythology he's referencing does and he believes such mythology is the best way to examine cultural psychology. Chaos is often associated with the feminine because females can create life, that's what it all really boils down to in most ancient religions. Chaos is not inherently a negative trait either, it is the balance to law/order. Try playing some SMT and you can delve further into this quite easily. --- https://imgtc.com/Y8ojZ3x <cite>sevihaimerej posted [p:927465664] in ew, why am... [t:78013337]...</cite> <quote>Evening_Dragon posted... </cite> <quote>He never once explains the science behind the masculine/feminine dynamic he likes to tout. Not once. It's stuff that sounds good to directionless young men, but none of them can tell me the scientific theory at work here, and neither can Peterson.</quote>He's talking about pre-established mythos, none of it is really his own original thoughts. He associates the feminine with the passive and chaotic in his talks because the mythology he's referencing does and he believes such mythology is the best way to examine cultural psychology. Chaos is often associated with the feminine because females can create life, that's what it all really boils down to in most ancient religions. Chaos is not inherently a negative trait either, it is the balance to law/order. Try playing some SMT and you can delve further into this quite easily. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheAnthraxBunny 09/15/19 10:47:10 AM #62:	1337toothbrush posted... It's an expression of disgust. Do you also not understand people above 10 years old who use "ow"? For real. What a desperate attempt to look smart. --- Yes, it is against the terms of service. Do not use the boards to set up orgies. -Alucard188 <cite>TheAnthraxBunny posted [p:927465700] in ew, why am... [t:78013337]...</cite> <quote>1337toothbrush posted... </cite> <quote>It's an expression of disgust. Do you also not understand people above 10 years old who use "ow"?</quote>For real. What a desperate attempt to look smart. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
user-2 09/15/19 11:04:36 AM #63:	1337toothbrush posted... user-2 posted... I never understood people above 10 years old who use "eww" It's an expression of disgust. Do you also not understand people above 10 years old who use "ow"? Eww sounds very girly tbh. <cite>user-2 posted [p:927466201] in ew, why am... [t:78013337]...</cite> <quote>1337toothbrush posted...</cite> <quote>user-2 posted...</cite> <quote>I never understood people above 10 years old who use "eww"</quote> It's an expression of disgust. Do you also not understand people above 10 years old who use "ow"?</quote> Eww sounds very girly tbh.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
treewojima 09/15/19 11:07:11 AM #64:	user-2 posted... 1337toothbrush posted... user-2 posted... I never understood people above 10 years old who use "eww" It's an expression of disgust. Do you also not understand people above 10 years old who use "ow"? Eww sounds very girly tbh. well my life IS pretty chaotic right now <cite>treewojima posted [p:927466278] in ew, why am... [t:78013337]...</cite> <quote><cite>user-2 posted...</cite> <quote>1337toothbrush posted...</cite> <quote> user-2 posted...</cite> <quote> I never understood people above 10 years old who use "eww" </quote> It's an expression of disgust. Do you also not understand people above 10 years old who use "ow"?</quote> Eww sounds very girly tbh.</quote> well my life IS pretty chaotic right now</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Sad_Face 09/15/19 4:33:11 PM #65:	averagejoel posted... factually, a society ostracizing women if they didn't conform to an arbitrary standard and act exactly as the men in power wanted them to, has a significant effect on the jobs that women can do. you are incorrect to assert otherwise. The men in power also have a significant effect on the jobs men can do as well. Right now, the 4th Industrial Revolution is approaching which will completely revamp our multimillennia old contracts so that everything is seamless, automated, and trustless thanks to smart contracts. This will put a lot of people out of jobs. Why are you trying to make a focus on marginalized women and focusing on the gender that's in power? Whoever has the lead is going to determine the dynamics of the demographics being lead. This isn't exclusive to a single gender. --- imgtc.com/i/4HgTl0ebzq.jpg imgtc.com/i/60CWP2Gtlg.gif <cite>Sad_Face posted [p:927479481] in ew, why am... [t:78013337]...</cite> <quote>averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote>factually, a society ostracizing women if they didn't conform to an arbitrary standard and act exactly as the men in power wanted them to, has a significant effect on the jobs that women can do. you are incorrect to assert otherwise.</quote> The men in power also have a significant effect on the jobs men can do as well. Right now, the 4th Industrial Revolution is approaching which will completely revamp our multimillennia old contracts so that everything is seamless, automated, and trustless thanks to smart contracts. This will put a lot of people out of jobs. Why are you trying to make a focus on marginalized women and focusing on the gender that's in power? Whoever has the lead is going to determine the dynamics of the demographics being lead. This isn't exclusive to a single gender.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Wetterdew 09/15/19 4:54:09 PM #66:	Machete posted... DeadBankerDream posted... that its impossible for atheists to quit smoking. lmfao did he really say that? Yes he did, and he insisted on it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ElnInbUlEqE" data-time=" --- Touch fuzzy get dizzy. <cite>Wetterdew posted [p:927480424] in ew, why am... [t:78013337]...</cite> <quote>Machete posted...</cite> <quote>DeadBankerDream posted...</cite> <quote> that its impossible for atheists to quit smoking.</quote> lmfao did he really say that?</quote> Yes he did, and he insisted on it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ElnInbUlEqE" data-time="</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LeoFrank 09/15/19 4:55:44 PM #67:	Because Peterson signed with CAA. <cite>LeoFrank posted [p:927480492] in ew, why am... [t:78013337]...</cite> <quote>Because Peterson signed with CAA.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Solid Snake07 09/15/19 5:04:16 PM #68:	DeadBankerDream posted... Frogles posted... why the fuck would anybody dislike jordan peterson Maybe his love for making Hitler seem less evil and incompetent than he was. Or the millions of insane things he says like that its impossible for atheists to quit smoking. I'm gonna need you to link to these, cause I've watched a good bit of the man and I've never heard those things. Jordan Peterson is one of the most misrepresented people on the internet from my experiance. You always hear about all this outlandish shit he's said or believes but I never actually see him say it. So if he said those things and you can show it to me fair play. If you cant you can fuck off with that shit --- "People incapable of guilt usually do have a good time" -Detective Rust Cohle <cite>Solid Snake07 posted [p:927480913] in ew, why am... [t:78013337]...</cite> <quote>DeadBankerDream posted...</cite> <quote>Frogles posted...</cite> <quote>why the fuck would anybody dislike jordan peterson </quote> Maybe his love for making Hitler seem less evil and incompetent than he was. Or the millions of insane things he says like that its impossible for atheists to quit smoking.</quote> I'm gonna need you to link to these, cause I've watched a good bit of the man and I've never heard those things. Jordan Peterson is one of the most misrepresented people on the internet from my experiance. You always hear about all this outlandish shit he's said or believes but I never actually see him say it. So if he said those things and you can show it to me fair play. If you cant you can fuck off with that shit</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Solid Snake07 09/15/19 5:19:02 PM #69:	Wetterdew posted... Machete posted... DeadBankerDream posted... that its impossible for atheists to quit smoking. lmfao did he really say that? Yes he did, and he insisted on it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ElnInbUlEqE" data-time=" He didnt say you need to believe in god to quit smoking. He said people who have "mystical" or "supernatural" experiances while using psychedelics have often quit smoking because of those experiances. The only issue with what he said that I can see is when he said "no, not really" around 30 seconds. Which is boardering on definitive language even though it really isn't, he kind of played the fence a bit. Obviously people have quit smoking without the use of other chemicals or without having a "coming to god moment" Honestly theyre both kind of talking bull shit philosophy, but I agree with the bald guy on more of what was said. But the discussion wasn't really about any universal hard truth --- "People incapable of guilt usually do have a good time" -Detective Rust Cohle <cite>Solid Snake07 posted [p:927481537] in ew, why am... [t:78013337]...</cite> <quote>Wetterdew posted...</cite> <quote>Machete posted...</cite> <quote>DeadBankerDream posted...</cite> <quote> that its impossible for atheists to quit smoking.</quote> lmfao did he really say that?</quote> Yes he did, and he insisted on it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ElnInbUlEqE" data-time="</quote> He didnt say you need to believe in god to quit smoking. He said people who have "mystical" or "supernatural" experiances while using psychedelics have often quit smoking because of those experiances. The only issue with what he said that I can see is when he said "no, not really" around 30 seconds. Which is boardering on definitive language even though it really isn't, he kind of played the fence a bit. Obviously people have quit smoking without the use of other chemicals or without having a "coming to god moment" Honestly theyre both kind of talking bull shit philosophy, but I agree with the bald guy on more of what was said. But the discussion wasn't really about any universal hard truth</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ThyCorndog 09/15/19 5:21:44 PM #70:	bald guy in that vid sounds a lot smarter than Peterson --- https://imgur.com/6cPXvLN <cite>ThyCorndog posted [p:927481665] in ew, why am... [t:78013337]...</cite> <quote>bald guy in that vid sounds a lot smarter than Peterson</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
COVxy 09/15/19 5:23:31 PM #71:	It's sad that people care about this charlatan. --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] <cite>COVxy posted [p:927481728] in ew, why am... [t:78013337]...</cite> <quote>It's sad that people care about this charlatan. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Solid Snake07 09/15/19 6:03:14 PM #72:	COVxy posted... It's sad that people care about this charlatan. I care more about the massive amount of people who blatantly lie about things he's said --- "People incapable of guilt usually do have a good time" -Detective Rust Cohle <cite>Solid Snake07 posted [p:927483404] in ew, why am... [t:78013337]...</cite> <quote>COVxy posted...</cite> <quote>It's sad that people care about this charlatan. </quote> I care more about the massive amount of people who blatantly lie about things he's said</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
D_Fen_Door 09/15/19 6:05:27 PM #73:	Why are there so many songs about rainbows and whats on the ooooother siiiiide. <cite>D_Fen_Door posted [p:927483520] in ew, why am... [t:78013337]...</cite> <quote>Why are there so many songs about rainbows and whats on the ooooother siiiiide.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
treewojima 09/15/19 6:13:43 PM #74:	treewojima posted... user-2 posted... 1337toothbrush posted... user-2 posted... I never understood people above 10 years old who use "eww" It's an expression of disgust. Do you also not understand people above 10 years old who use "ow"? Eww sounds very girly tbh. well my life IS pretty chaotic right now come on, I thought this was clever <cite>treewojima posted [p:927483875] in ew, why am... [t:78013337]...</cite> <quote><cite>treewojima posted...</cite> <quote><cite>user-2 posted...</cite> <quote> 1337toothbrush posted...</cite> <quote> user-2 posted...</cite> <quote> I never understood people above 10 years old who use "eww" </quote> It's an expression of disgust. Do you also not understand people above 10 years old who use "ow"? </quote> Eww sounds very girly tbh.</quote> well my life IS pretty chaotic right now</quote> come on, I thought this was clever</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
The Great Muta 22 09/15/19 8:22:13 PM #75:	omega cookie posted... The Great Muta 22 posted... BignutzisBack posted... It's amazing how easily Peterson gets people frothing at the mouth lol Why do you guys all think that if someone doesn't like or makes fun of the random YouTube "debater" that gets trotted out it suddenly means they are either enraged or afraid of them or something? What ever happened to just mocking something? Like with JP. I think his anagolgies are stupid and he sounds and looks like a complete meandering dork, and his fanboys treat him like a cult leader. Thus I make fun of him. If others like him then cool, I don't give a shit either way and will still mock him. Good Christ, pot and kettle here. How is it pot meet kettle if I dont give a fuck if y'all want to be JP humpers? --- https://youtu.be/rYy0o-J0x20?t=300 "Thank you, good night. I hope you're happy" <cite>The Great Muta 22 posted [p:927489599] in ew, why am... [t:78013337]...</cite> <quote>omega cookie posted...</cite> <quote>The Great Muta 22 posted...</cite> <quote>BignutzisBack posted...</cite> <quote>It's amazing how easily Peterson gets people frothing at the mouth lol </quote> Why do you guys all think that if someone doesn't like or makes fun of the random YouTube "debater" that gets trotted out it suddenly means they are either enraged or afraid of them or something? What ever happened to just mocking something? Like with JP. I think his anagolgies are stupid and he sounds and looks like a complete meandering dork, and his fanboys treat him like a cult leader. Thus I make fun of him. If others like him then cool, I don't give a shit either way and will still mock him.</quote> Good Christ, pot and kettle here.</quote> How is it pot meet kettle if I dont give a fuck if y'all want to be JP humpers?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
averagejoel 09/16/19 1:08:23 PM #76:	Sad_Face posted... averagejoel posted... factually, a society ostracizing women if they didn't conform to an arbitrary standard and act exactly as the men in power wanted them to, has a significant effect on the jobs that women can do. you are incorrect to assert otherwise. The men in power also have a significant effect on the jobs men can do as well. Right now, the 4th Industrial Revolution is approaching which will completely revamp our multimillennia old contracts so that everything is seamless, automated, and trustless thanks to smart contracts. This will put a lot of people out of jobs. Why are you trying to make a focus on marginalized women and focusing on the gender that's in power? Whoever has the lead is going to determine the dynamics of the demographics being lead. This isn't exclusive to a single gender. I didn't suggest that it was exclusive to one gender. however, when I posed you the question in the first place, the answer was a flat-out "no." regardless of what you think, that is incorrect. --- peanut butter and dick <cite>averagejoel posted [p:927518676] in ew, why am... [t:78013337]...</cite> <quote>Sad_Face posted...</cite> <quote>averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote>factually, a society ostracizing women if they didn't conform to an arbitrary standard and act exactly as the men in power wanted them to, has a significant effect on the jobs that women can do. you are incorrect to assert otherwise.</quote> The men in power also have a significant effect on the jobs men can do as well. Right now, the 4th Industrial Revolution is approaching which will completely revamp our multimillennia old contracts so that everything is seamless, automated, and trustless thanks to smart contracts. This will put a lot of people out of jobs. Why are you trying to make a focus on marginalized women and focusing on the gender that's in power? Whoever has the lead is going to determine the dynamics of the demographics being lead. This isn't exclusive to a single gender.</quote> I didn't suggest that it was exclusive to one gender. however, when I posed you the question in the first place, the answer was a flat-out "no." regardless of what you think, that is incorrect.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
joe40001 09/16/19 7:27:54 PM #77:	You probably need to clean your room. --- "joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori https://imgur.com/TheGsZ9 <cite>joe40001 posted [p:927534271] in ew, why am... [t:78013337]...</cite> <quote>You probably need to clean your room.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DeadBankerDream 09/16/19 7:37:10 PM #78:	Wetterdew posted... Machete posted... DeadBankerDream posted... that its impossible for atheists to quit smoking. lmfao did he really say that? Yes he did, and he insisted on it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ElnInbUlEqE" data-time=" Oh yeah, I forgot how he also said that people claiming they had a supernatural experience is evidence for supernatural experiences being a thing that exists. What a moron. I don't even think he's a religiously motivated moron, his religion is all a sham for appealing to a specific set of people. Dude is probably an agnostic non-believer. --- "Your mother was a broken down tub of junk with more gentlemen callers than the operator." <cite>DeadBankerDream posted [p:927534630] in ew, why am... [t:78013337]...</cite> <quote>Wetterdew posted...</cite> <quote>Machete posted...</cite> <quote>DeadBankerDream posted...</cite> <quote> that its impossible for atheists to quit smoking.</quote> lmfao did he really say that?</quote> Yes he did, and he insisted on it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ElnInbUlEqE" data-time="</quote> Oh yeah, I forgot how he also said that people claiming they had a supernatural experience is evidence for supernatural experiences being a thing that exists. What a moron. I don't even think he's a religiously motivated moron, his religion is all a sham for appealing to a specific set of people. Dude is probably an agnostic non-believer.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
joe40001 09/16/19 8:07:07 PM #79:	Nobody is forcing anybody to watch jordan peterson, for those who need that kind of insight and guidance with their life he's been a huge help to so many thousands of people, so I really don't get the hate towards the guy. --- "joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori https://imgur.com/TheGsZ9 <cite>joe40001 posted [p:927535818] in ew, why am... [t:78013337]...</cite> <quote>Nobody is forcing anybody to watch jordan peterson, for those who need that kind of insight and guidance with their life he's been a huge help to so many thousands of people, so I really don't get the hate towards the guy.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
pls 09/16/19 8:17:10 PM #80:	@Frogles Keep in mind that averagejoel is a Stalin apologist / revolutionary communist who hates Jordan Peterson due to feeling threatened by JP's scathing criticisms of Marxism. That's why he padded his list with blatant lies. <cite>pls posted [p:927536289] in ew, why am... [t:78013337]...</cite> <quote>@Frogles Keep in mind that averagejoel is a Stalin apologist / revolutionary communist who hates Jordan Peterson due to feeling threatened by JP's scathing criticisms of Marxism. That's why he padded his list with blatant lies. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2

Current Events > ew, why am I getting Jordan Peterson videos in my YouTube recommendations? (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > ew, why am I getting Jordan Peterson videos in my YouTube recommendations?