Current Events > Abortions after 6 weeks will now be illegal in Georgia

Topic List	Page List: 1
#160	Post #160 was unavailable or deleted.
hockeybub89 05/10/19 12:34:24 PM #161:	McgeesAlice808 posted... Southern countries are really regressing. Pure fucking evil --- http://card.psnprofiles.com/1/NIR_Hockey.png http://www.last.fm/user/hockeybub89/ <cite>hockeybub89 posted [p:921717078] in Abortions ... [t:77698707]...</cite> <quote><cite>McgeesAlice808 posted...</cite> <quote>Southern countries are really regressing.</quote> Pure fucking evil</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DifferentialEquation 05/10/19 12:35:45 PM #162:	Good. That's the way it should be. --- There's no business to be taxed. <cite>DifferentialEquation posted [p:921717126] in Abortions ... [t:77698707]...</cite> <quote>Good. That's the way it should be.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
karlpilkington4 05/10/19 12:36:16 PM #163:	hockeybub89 posted... McgeesAlice808 posted... Southern countries are really regressing. Pure fucking evil Preserving life itself is literally the opposite of evil. --- Is This The Krusty Krab? "No This Is Patrick!" <cite>karlpilkington4 posted [p:921717150] in Abortions ... [t:77698707]...</cite> <quote><cite>hockeybub89 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>McgeesAlice808 posted...</cite> <quote>Southern countries are really regressing.</quote> Pure fucking evil</quote> Preserving life itself is literally the opposite of evil.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Webmaster4531 05/10/19 12:44:06 PM #164:	karlpilkington4 posted... hockeybub89 posted... McgeesAlice808 posted... Southern countries are really regressing. Pure fucking evil Preserving life itself is literally the opposite of evil. Exactly, laws like these lead to the deaths of grown women. --- Ad Hominem. <cite>Webmaster4531 posted [p:921717458] in Abortions ... [t:77698707]...</cite> <quote><cite>karlpilkington4 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>hockeybub89 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>McgeesAlice808 posted...</cite> <quote>Southern countries are really regressing.</quote> Pure fucking evil</quote> Preserving life itself is literally the opposite of evil.</quote> Exactly, laws like these lead to the deaths of grown women.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Machete 05/10/19 2:09:12 PM #165:	Webmaster4531 posted... karlpilkington4 posted... hockeybub89 posted... McgeesAlice808 posted... Southern countries are really regressing. Pure fucking evil Preserving life itself is literally the opposite of evil. Exactly, laws like these lead to the deaths of grown women. And children who are rape victims. --- Place-holder sig because new phone and old sigs not saved :/ <cite>Machete posted [p:921720913] in Abortions ... [t:77698707]...</cite> <quote><cite>Webmaster4531 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>karlpilkington4 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>hockeybub89 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>McgeesAlice808 posted...</cite> <quote>Southern countries are really regressing.</quote> Pure fucking evil</quote> Preserving life itself is literally the opposite of evil.</quote> Exactly, laws like these lead to the deaths of grown women.</quote> And children who are rape victims.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hockeybub89 05/10/19 3:05:41 PM #166:	karlpilkington4 posted... hockeybub89 posted... McgeesAlice808 posted... Southern countries are really regressing. Pure fucking evil Preserving life itself is literally the opposite of evil. Mandating someone prioritize someone else's life over theirs is pretty fucking evil. Banning abortion is morally wrong even if you view the fetus as human life and a person. No one has a right to your body without continuous consent. It's the ultimate government overstep. It goes hand in hand with allowing the government to choose who lives and dies. --- http://card.psnprofiles.com/1/NIR_Hockey.png http://www.last.fm/user/hockeybub89/ <cite>hockeybub89 posted [p:921723163] in Abortions ... [t:77698707]...</cite> <quote><cite>karlpilkington4 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>hockeybub89 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>McgeesAlice808 posted...</cite> <quote>Southern countries are really regressing.</quote> Pure fucking evil</quote> Preserving life itself is literally the opposite of evil.</quote> Mandating someone prioritize someone else's life over theirs is pretty fucking evil. Banning abortion is morally wrong even if you view the fetus as human life and a person. No one has a right to your body without continuous consent. It's the ultimate government overstep. It goes hand in hand with allowing the government to choose who lives and dies.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Machete 05/10/19 3:23:51 PM #167:	hockeybub89 posted... karlpilkington4 posted... hockeybub89 posted... McgeesAlice808 posted... Southern countries are really regressing. Pure fucking evil Preserving life itself is literally the opposite of evil. Mandating someone prioritize someone else's life over theirs is pretty fucking evil. Banning abortion is morally wrong even if you view the fetus as human life and a person. No one has a right to your body without continuous consent. It's the ultimate government overstep. It goes hand in hand with allowing the government to choose who lives and dies. This needs that no lies detected gif --- Place-holder sig because new phone and old sigs not saved :/ <cite>Machete posted [p:921723898] in Abortions ... [t:77698707]...</cite> <quote><cite>hockeybub89 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>karlpilkington4 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>hockeybub89 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>McgeesAlice808 posted...</cite> <quote>Southern countries are really regressing.</quote> Pure fucking evil</quote> Preserving life itself is literally the opposite of evil.</quote> Mandating someone prioritize someone else's life over theirs is pretty fucking evil. Banning abortion is morally wrong even if you view the fetus as human life and a person. No one has a right to your body without continuous consent. It's the ultimate government overstep. It goes hand in hand with allowing the government to choose who lives and dies.</quote> This needs that no lies detected gif</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TrevorBlack79 05/10/19 3:25:00 PM #168:	Machete posted... hockeybub89 posted... karlpilkington4 posted... hockeybub89 posted... McgeesAlice808 posted... Southern countries are really regressing. Pure fucking evil Preserving life itself is literally the opposite of evil. Mandating someone prioritize someone else's life over theirs is pretty fucking evil. Banning abortion is morally wrong even if you view the fetus as human life and a person. No one has a right to your body without continuous consent. It's the ultimate government overstep. It goes hand in hand with allowing the government to choose who lives and dies. This needs that no lies detected gif Hockey is 100% correct in that post. --- "a minority is someone who you can tell off the bat they are black/hispanic/colored. LGBT isn't a minority" - Blakkheim1 <cite>TrevorBlack79 posted [p:921723953] in Abortions ... [t:77698707]...</cite> <quote><cite>Machete posted...</cite> <quote><cite>hockeybub89 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>karlpilkington4 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>hockeybub89 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>McgeesAlice808 posted...</cite> <quote>Southern countries are really regressing.</quote> Pure fucking evil</quote> Preserving life itself is literally the opposite of evil.</quote> Mandating someone prioritize someone else's life over theirs is pretty fucking evil. Banning abortion is morally wrong even if you view the fetus as human life and a person. No one has a right to your body without continuous consent. It's the ultimate government overstep. It goes hand in hand with allowing the government to choose who lives and dies.</quote> This needs that no lies detected gif</quote> Hockey is 100% correct in that post.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Machete 05/10/19 3:30:24 PM #169:	TrevorBlack79 posted... Machete posted... hockeybub89 posted... karlpilkington4 posted... hockeybub89 posted... McgeesAlice808 posted... Southern countries are really regressing. Pure fucking evil Preserving life itself is literally the opposite of evil. Mandating someone prioritize someone else's life over theirs is pretty fucking evil. Banning abortion is morally wrong even if you view the fetus as human life and a person. No one has a right to your body without continuous consent. It's the ultimate government overstep. It goes hand in hand with allowing the government to choose who lives and dies. This needs that no lies detected gif Hockey is 100% correct in that post. Hence my response lol :P --- Place-holder sig because new phone and old sigs not saved :/ <cite>Machete posted [p:921724189] in Abortions ... [t:77698707]...</cite> <quote><cite>TrevorBlack79 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Machete posted...</cite> <quote><cite>hockeybub89 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>karlpilkington4 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>hockeybub89 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>McgeesAlice808 posted...</cite> <quote>Southern countries are really regressing.</quote> Pure fucking evil</quote> Preserving life itself is literally the opposite of evil.</quote> Mandating someone prioritize someone else's life over theirs is pretty fucking evil. Banning abortion is morally wrong even if you view the fetus as human life and a person. No one has a right to your body without continuous consent. It's the ultimate government overstep. It goes hand in hand with allowing the government to choose who lives and dies.</quote> This needs that no lies detected gif</quote> Hockey is 100% correct in that post.</quote> Hence my response lol :P</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Webmaster4531 05/10/19 3:37:27 PM #170:	Machete posted... TrevorBlack79 posted... Machete posted... hockeybub89 posted... karlpilkington4 posted... hockeybub89 posted... McgeesAlice808 posted... Southern countries are really regressing. Pure fucking evil Preserving life itself is literally the opposite of evil. Mandating someone prioritize someone else's life over theirs is pretty fucking evil. Banning abortion is morally wrong even if you view the fetus as human life and a person. No one has a right to your body without continuous consent. It's the ultimate government overstep. It goes hand in hand with allowing the government to choose who lives and dies. This needs that no lies detected gif Hockey is 100% correct in that post. Hence my response lol :P Well I've seen it used sarcastically to posts full of lies and I can't think of any time when it was used to mean they're telling the truth. --- Ad Hominem. <cite>Webmaster4531 posted [p:921724483] in Abortions ... [t:77698707]...</cite> <quote><cite>Machete posted...</cite> <quote><cite>TrevorBlack79 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Machete posted...</cite> <quote><cite>hockeybub89 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>karlpilkington4 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>hockeybub89 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>McgeesAlice808 posted...</cite> <quote>Southern countries are really regressing.</quote> Pure fucking evil</quote> Preserving life itself is literally the opposite of evil.</quote> Mandating someone prioritize someone else's life over theirs is pretty fucking evil. Banning abortion is morally wrong even if you view the fetus as human life and a person. No one has a right to your body without continuous consent. It's the ultimate government overstep. It goes hand in hand with allowing the government to choose who lives and dies.</quote> This needs that no lies detected gif</quote> Hockey is 100% correct in that post.</quote> Hence my response lol :P</quote> Well I've seen it used sarcastically to posts full of lies and I can't think of any time when it was used to mean they're telling the truth.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TrevorBlack79 05/10/19 3:39:23 PM #171:	^ Yeah, what he said. --- "a minority is someone who you can tell off the bat they are black/hispanic/colored. LGBT isn't a minority" - Blakkheim1 <cite>TrevorBlack79 posted [p:921724559] in Abortions ... [t:77698707]...</cite> <quote>^ Yeah, what he said.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Machete 05/10/19 3:48:59 PM #172:	Ah, no. I meant it literally and I just don't have the actual gif handy and it would be annoying to look up on my phone >_> --- Place-holder sig because new phone and old sigs not saved :/ <cite>Machete posted [p:921724969] in Abortions ... [t:77698707]...</cite> <quote>Ah, no. I meant it literally and I just don't have the actual gif handy and it would be annoying to look up on my phone >_></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
coolboy11 05/10/19 3:50:56 PM #173:	Kemp and the Republican legislature making our state's largely incompetent State bureaucracy even more of a laughing stock, nice. --- "A superhero in the flesh, even at my worst I'm the best"-Big KRIT <cite>coolboy11 posted [p:921725053] in Abortions ... [t:77698707]...</cite> <quote>Kemp and the Republican legislature making our state's largely incompetent State bureaucracy even more of a laughing stock, nice.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#174	Post #174 was unavailable or deleted.
TrevorBlack79 05/11/19 9:42:53 PM #175:	thanks-gohan posted... And men shouldn't have any say at all. "men shouldnt have a say at all" "please spend 3/4 of your paycheck on the kid you didn't want instead of us paying for it" You could just not bust in the girl. --- "a minority is someone who you can tell off the bat they are black/hispanic/colored. LGBT isn't a minority" - Blakkheim1 <cite>TrevorBlack79 posted [p:921776240] in Abortions ... [t:77698707]...</cite> <quote><cite>thanks-gohan posted...</cite> <quote><quote>And men shouldn't have any say at all.</quote> "men shouldnt have a say at all" "please spend 3/4 of your paycheck on the kid you didn't want instead of us paying for it"</quote> You could just not bust in the girl.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
brandunh11 05/11/19 9:43:53 PM #176:	Kyle1022 posted... Antifar posted... https://twitter.com/mjs_dc/status/1125857380468760582 The tweet under that says that a woman who travels out of state to get a legal abortion could still be punished, and jailed up to 10 years. Dumb ass Republican party continues to chop off its nose to spite its face. Unreal. The Dems are TRYING to hand them 4 more years of presidency and instead of taking it they're pulling dumb shit like this lmao This is the scariest part of the whole thing. Punishing someone for legal acts done outside your borders is a whole new level of government oversight. At this point theyre literally treating people like property of the state. --- https://imgur.com/MDQBi2C <cite>brandunh11 posted [p:921776290] in Abortions ... [t:77698707]...</cite> <quote><cite>Kyle1022 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Antifar posted...</cite> <quote>https://twitter.com/mjs_dc/status/1125857380468760582</quote> The tweet under that says that a woman who travels out of state to get a legal abortion could still be punished, and jailed up to 10 years. Dumb ass Republican party continues to chop off its nose to spite its face. Unreal. The Dems are TRYING to hand them 4 more years of presidency and instead of taking it they're pulling dumb shit like this lmao</quote> This is the scariest part of the whole thing. Punishing someone for legal acts done outside your borders is a whole new level of government oversight. At this point theyre literally treating people like property of the state.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
spudger 05/11/19 9:45:23 PM #177:	thanks-gohan posted... "please spend 3/4 of your paycheck on the kid citation wont be found cuz this is bullshit --- -Only dead fish swim with the current http://error1355.com/ce/spudger.html <cite>spudger posted [p:921776347] in Abortions ... [t:77698707]...</cite> <quote><cite>thanks-gohan posted...</cite> <quote>"please spend 3/4 of your paycheck on the kid</quote> citation wont be found cuz this is bullshit</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Antifar 05/11/19 9:49:07 PM #178:	brandunh11 posted... This is the scariest part of the whole thing. Punishing someone for legal acts done outside your borders is a whole new level of government oversight. At this point theyre literally treating people like property of the state. Which has some bad precedents, imo --- kin to all that throbs <cite>Antifar posted [p:921776486] in Abortions ... [t:77698707]...</cite> <quote><cite>brandunh11 posted...</cite> <quote> This is the scariest part of the whole thing. Punishing someone for legal acts done outside your borders is a whole new level of government oversight. At this point theyre literally treating people like property of the state.</quote> Which has some bad precedents, imo</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
burritosatan 05/11/19 10:00:00 PM #179:	spudger posted... thanks-gohan posted... "please spend 3/4 of your paycheck on the kid citation wont be found cuz this is bullshit It is, woman dont actually spend the child support payments on the kids they use it for buying themselves stuff like bud light and makeup and cigarettes --- and you are just like them all, stained by the name of fathers. im greeting my downward fall, leaving the throes to others <cite>burritosatan posted [p:921776818] in Abortions ... [t:77698707]...</cite> <quote><cite>spudger posted...</cite> <quote><cite>thanks-gohan posted...</cite> <quote>"please spend 3/4 of your paycheck on the kid</quote> citation wont be found cuz this is bullshit</quote> It is, woman dont actually spend the child support payments on the kids they use it for buying themselves stuff like bud light and makeup and cigarettes</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#180	Post #180 was unavailable or deleted.
hockeybub89 05/12/19 3:45:09 AM #181:	thanks-gohan posted... And men shouldn't have any say at all. "men shouldnt have a say at all" "please spend 3/4 of your paycheck on the kid you didn't want instead of us paying for it" Men can have their own babies if they want a say in what a woman does with her body. Blame biology for making men give 50% of the DNA but 0% of the pregnancy. I don't know if there is a good way to let men "opt-out" of supporting a child they wanted aborted. --- http://card.psnprofiles.com/1/NIR_Hockey.png http://www.last.fm/user/hockeybub89/ <cite>hockeybub89 posted [p:921785925] in Abortions ... [t:77698707]...</cite> <quote><cite>thanks-gohan posted...</cite> <quote><quote>And men shouldn't have any say at all.</quote> "men shouldnt have a say at all" "please spend 3/4 of your paycheck on the kid you didn't want instead of us paying for it"</quote> Men can have their own babies if they want a say in what a woman does with her body. Blame biology for making men give 50% of the DNA but 0% of the pregnancy. I don't know if there is a good way to let men "opt-out" of supporting a child they wanted aborted.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dragonblade01 05/12/19 3:58:58 AM #182:	We have to treat being able to opt out of parenthood as being separate from abortion, because the two would be permissible for completely different reasons. It may be true that a woman choosing to get an abortion is indeed opting out of parenthood, but abortions aren't permissible because someone "wants to opt out of parenthood." They're permissible because it is unreasonable for us to be able to force anyone to carry a pregnancy to term. That means regardless of the individual's motivation, abortion must be permissible. Creating another avenue for parents to opt-out of parental obligation is an entirely different question that requires an entirely different solution. <cite>Dragonblade01 posted [p:921786134] in Abortions ... [t:77698707]...</cite> <quote>We have to treat being able to opt out of parenthood as being separate from abortion, because the two would be permissible for completely different reasons. It may be true that a woman choosing to get an abortion is indeed opting out of parenthood, but abortions aren't permissible because someone "wants to opt out of parenthood." They're permissible because it is unreasonable for us to be able to force anyone to carry a pregnancy to term. That means regardless of the individual's motivation, abortion must be permissible. Creating another avenue for parents to opt-out of parental obligation is an entirely different question that requires an entirely different solution.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
karlpilkington4 05/12/19 5:53:45 AM #183:	Dragonblade01 posted... We have to treat being able to opt out of parenthood as being separate from abortion, because the two would be permissible for completely different reasons. It may be true that a woman choosing to get an abortion is indeed opting out of parenthood, but abortions aren't permissible because someone "wants to opt out of parenthood." They're permissible because it is unreasonable for us to be able to force anyone to carry a pregnancy to term. That means regardless of the individual's motivation, abortion must be permissible. Creating another avenue for parents to opt-out of parental obligation is an entirely different question that requires an entirely different solution. No its not. It's called responsibility and not terminating a human life. --- Is This The Krusty Krab? "No This Is Patrick!" <cite>karlpilkington4 posted [p:921787416] in Abortions ... [t:77698707]...</cite> <quote><cite>Dragonblade01 posted...</cite> <quote>We have to treat being able to opt out of parenthood as being separate from abortion, because the two would be permissible for completely different reasons. It may be true that a woman choosing to get an abortion is indeed opting out of parenthood, but abortions aren't permissible because someone "wants to opt out of parenthood." They're permissible because it is unreasonable for us to be able to force anyone to carry a pregnancy to term. That means regardless of the individual's motivation, abortion must be permissible. Creating another avenue for parents to opt-out of parental obligation is an entirely different question that requires an entirely different solution.</quote> No its not. It's called responsibility and not terminating a human life.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LightningAce11 05/12/19 5:56:20 AM #184:	What is with old white men trying to control what women and minorities do? If men could get pregnant abortion would be 100% legal everywhere. It's a huge thing that only one gender experiences, and many conservatives have the terrible habit of ridiculing or brushing aside issues they will never experience. --- "I'm an atheist too but still believe in hell. That's where you're headed pal." - Mr_Karate_II <cite>LightningAce11 posted [p:921787442] in Abortions ... [t:77698707]...</cite> <quote>What is with old white men trying to control what women and minorities do? If men could get pregnant abortion would be 100% legal everywhere. It's a huge thing that only one gender experiences, and many conservatives have the terrible habit of ridiculing or brushing aside issues they will never experience.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dragonblade01 05/12/19 5:57:45 AM #185:	karlpilkington4 posted... No its not. It's called responsibility and not terminating a human life. No human has any right to take from the body of another human without their explicit consent. Fetuses don't get special treatment. <cite>Dragonblade01 posted [p:921787463] in Abortions ... [t:77698707]...</cite> <quote><cite>karlpilkington4 posted...</cite> <quote>No its not. It's called responsibility and not terminating a human life.</quote> No human has any right to take from the body of another human without their explicit consent. Fetuses don't get special treatment.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
karlpilkington4 05/12/19 6:12:44 AM #186:	Dragonblade01 posted... karlpilkington4 posted... No its not. It's called responsibility and not terminating a human life. No human has any right to take from the body of another human without their explicit consent. Fetuses don't get special treatment. That fetus was created by that same person. It didnt consent to being created and no one should be able to end that life, because they want to be irresponsible. . Idk why you decided to stop your train of thought half way. --- Is This The Krusty Krab? "No This Is Patrick!" <cite>karlpilkington4 posted [p:921787641] in Abortions ... [t:77698707]...</cite> <quote><cite>Dragonblade01 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>karlpilkington4 posted...</cite> <quote>No its not. It's called responsibility and not terminating a human life.</quote> No human has any right to take from the body of another human without their explicit consent. Fetuses don't get special treatment.</quote> That fetus was created by that same person. It didnt consent to being created and no one should be able to end that life, because they want to be irresponsible. . Idk why you decided to stop your train of thought half way.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dragonblade01 05/12/19 6:18:33 AM #187:	karlpilkington4 posted... Dragonblade01 posted... karlpilkington4 posted... No its not. It's called responsibility and not terminating a human life. No human has any right to take from the body of another human without their explicit consent. Fetuses don't get special treatment. That fetus was created by that same person. It didnt consent to being created and no one should be able to end that life, because they want to be irresponsible. . Idk why you decided to stop your train of thought half way. The fetus being created by the same person does not mean said person loses their right to bodily autonomy. It doesn't matter if the fetus consented to the situation or not, it does not have a right to take from the body of another without that person's permission. Just like when someone gets in an accident and needs a blood transfusion or organ donation from another person. They didn't consent to an accident, and yet nobody is required to give them their blood/organ. If you value bodily autonomy, permitting abortion is the only morally consistent position to hold. <cite>Dragonblade01 posted [p:921787691] in Abortions ... [t:77698707]...</cite> <quote><cite>karlpilkington4 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Dragonblade01 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>karlpilkington4 posted...</cite> <quote>No its not. It's called responsibility and not terminating a human life.</quote> No human has any right to take from the body of another human without their explicit consent. Fetuses don't get special treatment.</quote> That fetus was created by that same person. It didnt consent to being created and no one should be able to end that life, because they want to be irresponsible. . Idk why you decided to stop your train of thought half way.</quote> The fetus being created by the same person does not mean said person loses their right to bodily autonomy. It doesn't matter if the fetus consented to the situation or not, it does not have a right to take from the body of another without that person's permission. Just like when someone gets in an accident and needs a blood transfusion or organ donation from another person. They didn't consent to an accident, and yet nobody is required to give them their blood/organ. If you value bodily autonomy, permitting abortion is the only morally consistent position to hold.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
karlpilkington4 05/12/19 6:26:35 AM #188:	Dragonblade01 posted... karlpilkington4 posted... Dragonblade01 posted... karlpilkington4 posted... No its not. It's called responsibility and not terminating a human life. No human has any right to take from the body of another human without their explicit consent. Fetuses don't get special treatment. That fetus was created by that same person. It didnt consent to being created and no one should be able to end that life, because they want to be irresponsible. . Idk why you decided to stop your train of thought half way. The fetus being created by the same person does not mean said person loses their right to bodily autonomy. It doesn't matter if the fetus consented to the situation or not, it does not have a right to take from the body of another without that person's permission. Just like when someone gets in an accident and needs a blood transfusion or organ donation from another person. They didn't consent to an accident, and yet nobody is required to give them their blood/organ. If you value bodily autonomy, permitting abortion is the only morally consistent position to hold. Sorry, but your false analogy isnt convincing. A car accident victim needing blood is not the same as a living being inside of a womb. --- Is This The Krusty Krab? "No This Is Patrick!" <cite>karlpilkington4 posted [p:921787784] in Abortions ... [t:77698707]...</cite> <quote><cite>Dragonblade01 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>karlpilkington4 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Dragonblade01 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>karlpilkington4 posted...</cite> <quote>No its not. It's called responsibility and not terminating a human life.</quote> No human has any right to take from the body of another human without their explicit consent. Fetuses don't get special treatment.</quote> That fetus was created by that same person. It didnt consent to being created and no one should be able to end that life, because they want to be irresponsible. . Idk why you decided to stop your train of thought half way.</quote> The fetus being created by the same person does not mean said person loses their right to bodily autonomy. It doesn't matter if the fetus consented to the situation or not, it does not have a right to take from the body of another without that person's permission. Just like when someone gets in an accident and needs a blood transfusion or organ donation from another person. They didn't consent to an accident, and yet nobody is required to give them their blood/organ. If you value bodily autonomy, permitting abortion is the only morally consistent position to hold.</quote> Sorry, but your false analogy isnt convincing. A car accident victim needing blood is not the same as a living being inside of a womb.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dragonblade01 05/12/19 6:36:33 AM #189:	karlpilkington4 posted... Dragonblade01 posted... karlpilkington4 posted... Dragonblade01 posted... karlpilkington4 posted... No its not. It's called responsibility and not terminating a human life. No human has any right to take from the body of another human without their explicit consent. Fetuses don't get special treatment. That fetus was created by that same person. It didnt consent to being created and no one should be able to end that life, because they want to be irresponsible. . Idk why you decided to stop your train of thought half way. The fetus being created by the same person does not mean said person loses their right to bodily autonomy. It doesn't matter if the fetus consented to the situation or not, it does not have a right to take from the body of another without that person's permission. Just like when someone gets in an accident and needs a blood transfusion or organ donation from another person. They didn't consent to an accident, and yet nobody is required to give them their blood/organ. If you value bodily autonomy, permitting abortion is the only morally consistent position to hold. Sorry, but your false analogy isnt convincing. A car accident victim needing blood is not the same as a living being inside of a womb. It's not a false analogy. They are the same in that someone needs something from another human body, and may only receive it if the other person consents. In all cases, no human is allowed to take from another human without their consent. A fetus is no different. <cite>Dragonblade01 posted [p:921787880] in Abortions ... [t:77698707]...</cite> <quote><cite>karlpilkington4 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Dragonblade01 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>karlpilkington4 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Dragonblade01 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>karlpilkington4 posted...</cite> <quote>No its not. It's called responsibility and not terminating a human life.</quote> No human has any right to take from the body of another human without their explicit consent. Fetuses don't get special treatment.</quote> That fetus was created by that same person. It didnt consent to being created and no one should be able to end that life, because they want to be irresponsible. . Idk why you decided to stop your train of thought half way.</quote> The fetus being created by the same person does not mean said person loses their right to bodily autonomy. It doesn't matter if the fetus consented to the situation or not, it does not have a right to take from the body of another without that person's permission. Just like when someone gets in an accident and needs a blood transfusion or organ donation from another person. They didn't consent to an accident, and yet nobody is required to give them their blood/organ. If you value bodily autonomy, permitting abortion is the only morally consistent position to hold.</quote> Sorry, but your false analogy isnt convincing. A car accident victim needing blood is not the same as a living being inside of a womb.</quote> It's not a false analogy. They are the same in that someone needs something from another human body, and may only receive it if the other person consents. In all cases, no human is allowed to take from another human without their consent. A fetus is no different.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hockeybub89 05/12/19 2:15:11 PM #190:	Dragonblade01 posted... If you value bodily autonomy, permitting abortion is the only morally consistent position to hold. --- http://card.psnprofiles.com/1/NIR_Hockey.png http://www.last.fm/user/hockeybub89/ <cite>hockeybub89 posted [p:921799584] in Abortions ... [t:77698707]...</cite> <quote><cite>Dragonblade01 posted...</cite> <quote>If you value bodily autonomy, permitting abortion is the only morally consistent position to hold.</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
pinky0926 05/13/19 10:18:48 AM #191:	This is embarrassing America --- CE's Resident Scotsman. https://imgur.com/ILz2ZbV <cite>pinky0926 posted [p:921833892] in Abortions ... [t:77698707]...</cite> <quote>This is embarrassing America</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#192	Post #192 was unavailable or deleted.
Hexenherz 05/16/19 9:58:33 AM #193:	I am reading HB 481 and I do not see the line suggesting questioning or investigating miscarriages. --- FFXIV: Herzog Erislieb (Cactaur) \| RS3: UltimaSuende . 99 WC/Fish/Cook/Fletch/Div <cite>Hexenherz posted [p:921968633] in Abortions ... [t:77698707]...</cite> <quote>I am reading HB 481 and I do not see the line suggesting questioning or investigating miscarriages.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1

Current Events > Abortions after 6 weeks will now be illegal in Georgia (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Abortions after 6 weeks will now be illegal in Georgia