Current Events > Transgender MMA Fighter Breaks Female Opponent's Skull

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
Hulkasaurusrex 11/15/18 1:33:12 AM #101:	https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KQpQmNhya14" data-time=" <cite>Hulkasaurusrex posted [p:912431395] in Transgende... [t:77203442]...</cite> <quote> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KQpQmNhya14" data-time="</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
nemu 11/15/18 1:36:17 AM #102:	gunplagirl posted... nemu posted... gunplagirl posted... The sex binary is not a catch all, you're the one ignoring that literal fucking geneticists say on the subject. You must know better than them though, with your zero qualifications. Your only examples are literal deformities, so I'm not too certain on that. They're not even classified as deformities by the appropriate medical fields that they're relevant to. Glad to know you don't actually care about being accurate. Arguing semantics doesn't push a debate forward. Whatever you want to call intersex people, they are plagued by a physical disorder that is not directly related to this topic. They are not part an example of an alternate sex. They do not prove any idea that genitals are not indicative of sex. It's like trying to say there is a spectrum of the number of human fingers because we can technically be born with zero to ten or more. <cite>nemu posted [p:912431496] in Transgende... [t:77203442]...</cite> <quote><cite>gunplagirl posted...</cite> <quote><cite>nemu posted...</cite> <quote><cite>gunplagirl posted...</cite><quote>The sex binary is not a catch all, you're the one ignoring that literal fucking geneticists say on the subject. You must know better than them though, with your zero qualifications.</quote> Your only examples are literal deformities, so I'm not too certain on that.</quote> They're not even classified as deformities by the appropriate medical fields that they're relevant to. Glad to know you don't actually care about being accurate.</quote> Arguing semantics doesn't push a debate forward. Whatever you want to call intersex people, they are plagued by a physical disorder that is not directly related to this topic. They are not part an example of an alternate sex. They do not prove any idea that genitals are not indicative of sex. It's like trying to say there is a spectrum of the number of human fingers because we can technically be born with zero to ten or more.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
gunplagirl 11/15/18 1:37:11 AM #103:	nemu posted... gunplagirl posted... nemu posted... gunplagirl posted... The sex binary is not a catch all, you're the one ignoring that literal fucking geneticists say on the subject. You must know better than them though, with your zero qualifications. Your only examples are literal deformities, so I'm not too certain on that. They're not even classified as deformities by the appropriate medical fields that they're relevant to. Glad to know you don't actually care about being accurate. Arguing semantics doesn't push a debate forward. Whatever you want to call intersex people, they are plagued by a physical disorder that is not directly related to this topic. They are not part an example of an alternate sex. They do not prove any idea that genitals are not indicative of sex. It's like trying to say there is a spectrum of the number of human fingers because we can technically be born with zero to ten or more. It's not semantics, it's literally the consensus of the relevant medical fields that it's not a deformity. --- Pew pew! <cite>gunplagirl posted [p:912431521] in Transgende... [t:77203442]...</cite> <quote><cite>nemu posted...</cite> <quote><cite>gunplagirl posted...</cite> <quote><cite>nemu posted...</cite> <quote><cite>gunplagirl posted...</cite><quote>The sex binary is not a catch all, you're the one ignoring that literal fucking geneticists say on the subject. You must know better than them though, with your zero qualifications.</quote> Your only examples are literal deformities, so I'm not too certain on that.</quote> They're not even classified as deformities by the appropriate medical fields that they're relevant to. Glad to know you don't actually care about being accurate.</quote> Arguing semantics doesn't push a debate forward. Whatever you want to call intersex people, they are plagued by a physical disorder that is not directly related to this topic. They are not part an example of an alternate sex. They do not prove any idea that genitals are not indicative of sex. It's like trying to say there is a spectrum of the number of human fingers because we can technically be born with zero to ten or more.</quote> It's not semantics, it's literally the consensus of the relevant medical fields that it's not a deformity.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
0AbsoluteZero0 11/15/18 1:38:59 AM #104:	Nidhoggr posted... DezDroppedFreak posted... Why are you the way you are @gunplagirl You literally chase everyone away that agrees on shit with you by acting like you have a stick up your ass about one nitpicking thing in their position. Its just fucking inflammatory behavior for no reason. gunplagirl is a prime example of someone who tries to be so incredibly progressive that they end up being regressive. For real. Im in favor of transgender rights and all, but gunpla is just repulsive. I could easily see some people here who are on the fence being pushed to the other side thanks to her vitriol. --- -The Admirable <cite>0AbsoluteZero0 posted [p:912431573] in Transgende... [t:77203442]...</cite> <quote><cite>Nidhoggr posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DezDroppedFreak posted...</cite> <quote>Why are you the way you are @gunplagirl You literally chase everyone away that agrees on shit with you by acting like you have a stick up your ass about one nitpicking thing in their position. Its just fucking inflammatory behavior for no reason.</quote> gunplagirl is a prime example of someone who tries to be so incredibly progressive that they end up being regressive.</quote> For real. Im in favor of transgender rights and all, but gunpla is just repulsive. I could easily see some people here who are on the fence being pushed to the other side thanks to her vitriol.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
eggcorn 11/15/18 1:39:40 AM #105:	gunplagirl posted... nemu posted... gunplagirl posted... nemu posted... gunplagirl posted... The sex binary is not a catch all, you're the one ignoring that literal fucking geneticists say on the subject. You must know better than them though, with your zero qualifications. Your only examples are literal deformities, so I'm not too certain on that. They're not even classified as deformities by the appropriate medical fields that they're relevant to. Glad to know you don't actually care about being accurate. Arguing semantics doesn't push a debate forward. Whatever you want to call intersex people, they are plagued by a physical disorder that is not directly related to this topic. They are not part an example of an alternate sex. They do not prove any idea that genitals are not indicative of sex. It's like trying to say there is a spectrum of the number of human fingers because we can technically be born with zero to ten or more. It's not semantics, it's literally the consensus of the relevant medical fields that it's not a deformity. Just take the L you're embarrassing yourself. --- Warning: This post may contain triggering or distressing content. <cite>eggcorn posted [p:912431589] in Transgende... [t:77203442]...</cite> <quote><cite>gunplagirl posted...</cite> <quote><cite>nemu posted...</cite> <quote><cite>gunplagirl posted...</cite> <quote><cite>nemu posted...</cite> <quote><cite>gunplagirl posted...</cite><quote>The sex binary is not a catch all, you're the one ignoring that literal fucking geneticists say on the subject. You must know better than them though, with your zero qualifications.</quote> Your only examples are literal deformities, so I'm not too certain on that.</quote> They're not even classified as deformities by the appropriate medical fields that they're relevant to. Glad to know you don't actually care about being accurate.</quote> Arguing semantics doesn't push a debate forward. Whatever you want to call intersex people, they are plagued by a physical disorder that is not directly related to this topic. They are not part an example of an alternate sex. They do not prove any idea that genitals are not indicative of sex. It's like trying to say there is a spectrum of the number of human fingers because we can technically be born with zero to ten or more.</quote> It's not semantics, it's literally the consensus of the relevant medical fields that it's not a deformity.</quote> Just take the L you're embarrassing yourself.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Sphyx 11/15/18 1:40:48 AM #106:	gunplagirl posted... So no, you aren't pro-lgbt if you're against trans people. You're probably not even pro-lgb. Way to lose the crowd. Seriously, what a childish and stupid thing to say. --- You're so vain, You probably think this sig is about you. <cite>Sphyx posted [p:912431610] in Transgende... [t:77203442]...</cite> <quote><cite>gunplagirl posted...</cite> <quote>So no, you aren't pro-lgbt if you're against trans people. You're probably not even pro-lgb.</quote> Way to lose the crowd. Seriously, what a childish and stupid thing to say.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
nemu 11/15/18 1:44:32 AM #107:	gunplagirl posted... nemu posted... gunplagirl posted... nemu posted... gunplagirl posted... The sex binary is not a catch all, you're the one ignoring that literal fucking geneticists say on the subject. You must know better than them though, with your zero qualifications. Your only examples are literal deformities, so I'm not too certain on that. They're not even classified as deformities by the appropriate medical fields that they're relevant to. Glad to know you don't actually care about being accurate. Arguing semantics doesn't push a debate forward. Whatever you want to call intersex people, they are plagued by a physical disorder that is not directly related to this topic. They are not part an example of an alternate sex. They do not prove any idea that genitals are not indicative of sex. It's like trying to say there is a spectrum of the number of human fingers because we can technically be born with zero to ten or more. It's not semantics, it's literally the consensus of the relevant medical fields that it's not a deformity. It's entirely semantics. You're acting as if the definition of that word means anything about anything in this discussion. You know what I mean. I know what I mean. It's literally a deformity per the dictionary definition, but people in the academic field likely use other words as they need to rigidly define things. That doesn't change the argument one iota. Bring up wording when it directly affects the core of the argument, not when it makes a good deflection topic. <cite>nemu posted [p:912431719] in Transgende... [t:77203442]...</cite> <quote><cite>gunplagirl posted...</cite> <quote><cite>nemu posted...</cite> <quote><cite>gunplagirl posted...</cite> <quote><cite>nemu posted...</cite> <quote><cite>gunplagirl posted...</cite><quote>The sex binary is not a catch all, you're the one ignoring that literal fucking geneticists say on the subject. You must know better than them though, with your zero qualifications.</quote> Your only examples are literal deformities, so I'm not too certain on that.</quote> They're not even classified as deformities by the appropriate medical fields that they're relevant to. Glad to know you don't actually care about being accurate.</quote> Arguing semantics doesn't push a debate forward. Whatever you want to call intersex people, they are plagued by a physical disorder that is not directly related to this topic. They are not part an example of an alternate sex. They do not prove any idea that genitals are not indicative of sex. It's like trying to say there is a spectrum of the number of human fingers because we can technically be born with zero to ten or more.</quote> It's not semantics, it's literally the consensus of the relevant medical fields that it's not a deformity.</quote> It's entirely semantics. You're acting as if the definition of that word means anything about anything in this discussion. You know what I mean. I know what I mean. It's literally a deformity per the dictionary definition, but people in the academic field likely use other words as they need to rigidly define things. That doesn't change the argument one iota. Bring up wording when it directly affects the core of the argument, not when it makes a good deflection topic.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
dave_is_slick 11/15/18 1:45:30 AM #108:	gunplagirl posted... The hilarious thing is that men who bring up the emotional response to anything that should illicit an emotional reaction, are usually emotionally unstable (and take delight in other's suffering, etc.) and somehow have gotten this idea that emotionlessness=right. There's a fancy phrase for the intentional hindering of one's feelings, ever hear the phrase "toxic masculinity" before? Because that's peak toxic masculinity right there. screeching intensifies --- The most relaxing version of Aquatic Ambiance I've ever heard: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bl61y1XM7sM <cite>dave_is_slick posted [p:912431760] in Transgende... [t:77203442]...</cite> <quote><cite>gunplagirl posted...</cite> <quote>The hilarious thing is that men who bring up the emotional response to anything that should illicit an emotional reaction, are usually emotionally unstable (and take delight in other's suffering, etc.) and somehow have gotten this idea that emotionlessness=right. There's a fancy phrase for the intentional hindering of one's feelings, ever hear the phrase "toxic masculinity" before? Because that's peak toxic masculinity right there.</quote> screeching intensifies</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
dave_is_slick 11/15/18 1:46:54 AM #109:	Sphyx posted... gunplagirl posted... So no, you aren't pro-lgbt if you're against trans people. You're probably not even pro-lgb. Way to lose the crowd. Seriously, what a childish and stupid thing to say. Well yeah, that's negi's thing. You don't even have to say anything of substance in order to get her to go off. --- The most relaxing version of Aquatic Ambiance I've ever heard: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bl61y1XM7sM <cite>dave_is_slick posted [p:912431810] in Transgende... [t:77203442]...</cite> <quote><cite>Sphyx posted...</cite> <quote><cite>gunplagirl posted...</cite> <quote>So no, you aren't pro-lgbt if you're against trans people. You're probably not even pro-lgb.</quote> Way to lose the crowd. Seriously, what a childish and stupid thing to say.</quote> Well yeah, that's negi's thing. You don't even have to say anything of substance in order to get her to go off.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
gunplagirl 11/15/18 1:46:59 AM #110:	Sphyx posted... gunplagirl posted... So no, you aren't pro-lgbt if you're against trans people. You're probably not even pro-lgb. Way to lose the crowd. Seriously, what a childish and stupid thing to say. "I don't actually like trans people or actually support them, and I think that bi people need to choose one, and actually I only like lesbians because porn but I SWEAR I'm pro LGBT" --- Pew pew! <cite>gunplagirl posted [p:912431811] in Transgende... [t:77203442]...</cite> <quote><cite>Sphyx posted...</cite> <quote><cite>gunplagirl posted...</cite> <quote>So no, you aren't pro-lgbt if you're against trans people. You're probably not even pro-lgb.</quote> Way to lose the crowd. Seriously, what a childish and stupid thing to say.</quote> "I don't actually like trans people or actually support them, and I think that bi people need to choose one, and actually I only like lesbians because porn but I SWEAR I'm pro LGBT"</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
dave_is_slick 11/15/18 1:47:59 AM #111:	gunplagirl posted... Sphyx posted... gunplagirl posted... So no, you aren't pro-lgbt if you're against trans people. You're probably not even pro-lgb. Way to lose the crowd. Seriously, what a childish and stupid thing to say. "I don't actually like trans people or actually support them, and I think that bi people need to choose one, and actually I only like lesbians because porn but I SWEAR I'm pro LGBT" dave_is_slick posted... You don't even have to say anything of substance in order to get her to go off. Ya see? --- The most relaxing version of Aquatic Ambiance I've ever heard: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bl61y1XM7sM <cite>dave_is_slick posted [p:912431845] in Transgende... [t:77203442]...</cite> <quote><cite>gunplagirl posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Sphyx posted...</cite> <quote><cite>gunplagirl posted...</cite> <quote>So no, you aren't pro-lgbt if you're against trans people. You're probably not even pro-lgb.</quote> Way to lose the crowd. Seriously, what a childish and stupid thing to say.</quote> "I don't actually like trans people or actually support them, and I think that bi people need to choose one, and actually I only like lesbians because porn but I SWEAR I'm pro LGBT"</quote> <cite>dave_is_slick posted...</cite> <quote>You don't even have to say anything of substance in order to get her to go off.</quote> Ya see?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
PleaseClap 11/15/18 1:48:08 AM #112:	0AbsoluteZero0 posted... Nidhoggr posted... DezDroppedFreak posted... Why are you the way you are @gunplagirl You literally chase everyone away that agrees on shit with you by acting like you have a stick up your ass about one nitpicking thing in their position. Its just fucking inflammatory behavior for no reason. gunplagirl is a prime example of someone who tries to be so incredibly progressive that they end up being regressive. For real. Im in favor of transgender rights and all, but gunpla is just repulsive. I could easily see some people here who are on the fence being pushed to the other side thanks to her vitriol. Im gonna stop believing in LGBT rights because this person annoyed me is an interesting take. --- Please <cite>PleaseClap posted [p:912431850] in Transgende... [t:77203442]...</cite> <quote><cite>0AbsoluteZero0 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Nidhoggr posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DezDroppedFreak posted...</cite> <quote>Why are you the way you are @gunplagirl You literally chase everyone away that agrees on shit with you by acting like you have a stick up your ass about one nitpicking thing in their position. Its just fucking inflammatory behavior for no reason.</quote> gunplagirl is a prime example of someone who tries to be so incredibly progressive that they end up being regressive.</quote> For real. Im in favor of transgender rights and all, but gunpla is just repulsive. I could easily see some people here who are on the fence being pushed to the other side thanks to her vitriol.</quote> Im gonna stop believing in LGBT rights because this person annoyed me is an interesting take.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
gunplagirl 11/15/18 1:49:09 AM #113:	nemu posted... gunplagirl posted... nemu posted... gunplagirl posted... nemu posted... gunplagirl posted... The sex binary is not a catch all, you're the one ignoring that literal fucking geneticists say on the subject. You must know better than them though, with your zero qualifications. Your only examples are literal deformities, so I'm not too certain on that. They're not even classified as deformities by the appropriate medical fields that they're relevant to. Glad to know you don't actually care about being accurate. Arguing semantics doesn't push a debate forward. Whatever you want to call intersex people, they are plagued by a physical disorder that is not directly related to this topic. They are not part an example of an alternate sex. They do not prove any idea that genitals are not indicative of sex. It's like trying to say there is a spectrum of the number of human fingers because we can technically be born with zero to ten or more. It's not semantics, it's literally the consensus of the relevant medical fields that it's not a deformity. It's entirely semantics. You're acting as if the definition of that word means anything about anything in this discussion. You know what I mean. I know what I mean. It's literally a deformity per the dictionary definition, but people in the academic field likely use other words as they need to rigidly define things. That doesn't change the argument one iota. Bring up wording when it directly affects the core of the argument, not when it makes a good deflection topic. You're the one ignoring the scientific definition in favor of applying a dictionary definition. You're the one being pedantic. But tell me, why does it matter that you are able to reiterate that it's a deformity (which medically, it isn't one)? It only serves to add to your "well we can't actually acknowledge intersex people" argument which again, is running contrary to what the relevant medical fields have to say on the matter. --- Pew pew! <cite>gunplagirl posted [p:912431887] in Transgende... [t:77203442]...</cite> <quote><cite>nemu posted...</cite> <quote><cite>gunplagirl posted...</cite> <quote><cite>nemu posted...</cite> <quote><cite>gunplagirl posted...</cite> <quote><cite>nemu posted...</cite> <quote><cite>gunplagirl posted...</cite><quote>The sex binary is not a catch all, you're the one ignoring that literal fucking geneticists say on the subject. You must know better than them though, with your zero qualifications.</quote> Your only examples are literal deformities, so I'm not too certain on that.</quote> They're not even classified as deformities by the appropriate medical fields that they're relevant to. Glad to know you don't actually care about being accurate.</quote> Arguing semantics doesn't push a debate forward. Whatever you want to call intersex people, they are plagued by a physical disorder that is not directly related to this topic. They are not part an example of an alternate sex. They do not prove any idea that genitals are not indicative of sex. It's like trying to say there is a spectrum of the number of human fingers because we can technically be born with zero to ten or more.</quote> It's not semantics, it's literally the consensus of the relevant medical fields that it's not a deformity.</quote> It's entirely semantics. You're acting as if the definition of that word means anything about anything in this discussion. You know what I mean. I know what I mean. It's literally a deformity per the dictionary definition, but people in the academic field likely use other words as they need to rigidly define things. That doesn't change the argument one iota. Bring up wording when it directly affects the core of the argument, not when it makes a good deflection topic.</quote> You're the one ignoring the scientific definition in favor of applying a dictionary definition. You're the one being pedantic. But tell me, why does it matter that you are able to reiterate that it's a deformity (which medically, it isn't one)? It only serves to add to your "well we can't actually acknowledge intersex people" argument which again, is running contrary to what the relevant medical fields have to say on the matter.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
gunplagirl 11/15/18 1:50:26 AM #114:	eggcorn posted... gunplagirl posted... nemu posted... gunplagirl posted... nemu posted... gunplagirl posted... The sex binary is not a catch all, you're the one ignoring that literal fucking geneticists say on the subject. You must know better than them though, with your zero qualifications. Your only examples are literal deformities, so I'm not too certain on that. They're not even classified as deformities by the appropriate medical fields that they're relevant to. Glad to know you don't actually care about being accurate. Arguing semantics doesn't push a debate forward. Whatever you want to call intersex people, they are plagued by a physical disorder that is not directly related to this topic. They are not part an example of an alternate sex. They do not prove any idea that genitals are not indicative of sex. It's like trying to say there is a spectrum of the number of human fingers because we can technically be born with zero to ten or more. It's not semantics, it's literally the consensus of the relevant medical fields that it's not a deformity. Just take the L you're embarrassing yourself. Why would I take the l when I'm not the one audacious enough to disagree with the literal medical community's definitions. --- Pew pew! <cite>gunplagirl posted [p:912431929] in Transgende... [t:77203442]...</cite> <quote><cite>eggcorn posted...</cite> <quote><cite>gunplagirl posted...</cite> <quote><cite>nemu posted...</cite> <quote><cite>gunplagirl posted...</cite> <quote><cite>nemu posted...</cite> <quote><cite>gunplagirl posted...</cite><quote>The sex binary is not a catch all, you're the one ignoring that literal fucking geneticists say on the subject. You must know better than them though, with your zero qualifications.</quote> Your only examples are literal deformities, so I'm not too certain on that.</quote> They're not even classified as deformities by the appropriate medical fields that they're relevant to. Glad to know you don't actually care about being accurate.</quote> Arguing semantics doesn't push a debate forward. Whatever you want to call intersex people, they are plagued by a physical disorder that is not directly related to this topic. They are not part an example of an alternate sex. They do not prove any idea that genitals are not indicative of sex. It's like trying to say there is a spectrum of the number of human fingers because we can technically be born with zero to ten or more.</quote> It's not semantics, it's literally the consensus of the relevant medical fields that it's not a deformity.</quote> Just take the L you're embarrassing yourself.</quote> Why would I take the l when I'm not the one audacious enough to disagree with the literal medical community's definitions.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#115	Post #115 was unavailable or deleted.
gunplagirl 11/15/18 1:53:33 AM #116:	PleaseClap posted... 0AbsoluteZero0 posted... Nidhoggr posted... DezDroppedFreak posted... Why are you the way you are @gunplagirl You literally chase everyone away that agrees on shit with you by acting like you have a stick up your ass about one nitpicking thing in their position. Its just fucking inflammatory behavior for no reason. gunplagirl is a prime example of someone who tries to be so incredibly progressive that they end up being regressive. For real. Im in favor of transgender rights and all, but gunpla is just repulsive. I could easily see some people here who are on the fence being pushed to the other side thanks to her vitriol. Im gonna stop believing in LGBT rights because this person annoyed me is an interesting take. Spoiler alert they never actually believed in the rights, and even if they did they never actually did anything to fight for those rights like protesting or sending a strongly worded letter to a government official or standing up to bigots. Hell, the "I'm pro LGBT but- types are the same ones who frequently make man in a dress jokes But you and I both know they see nothing wrong with it. --- Pew pew! <cite>gunplagirl posted [p:912432037] in Transgende... [t:77203442]...</cite> <quote><cite>PleaseClap posted...</cite> <quote><cite>0AbsoluteZero0 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Nidhoggr posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DezDroppedFreak posted...</cite> <quote>Why are you the way you are @gunplagirl You literally chase everyone away that agrees on shit with you by acting like you have a stick up your ass about one nitpicking thing in their position. Its just fucking inflammatory behavior for no reason.</quote> gunplagirl is a prime example of someone who tries to be so incredibly progressive that they end up being regressive.</quote> For real. Im in favor of transgender rights and all, but gunpla is just repulsive. I could easily see some people here who are on the fence being pushed to the other side thanks to her vitriol.</quote> Im gonna stop believing in LGBT rights because this person annoyed me is an interesting take.</quote> Spoiler alert they never actually believed in the rights, and even if they did they never actually did anything to fight for those rights like protesting or sending a strongly worded letter to a government official or standing up to bigots. Hell, the "I'm pro LGBT but- types are the same ones who frequently make man in a dress jokes But you and I both know they see nothing wrong with it.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
gunplagirl 11/15/18 1:53:59 AM #117:	ProfessorKukui posted... Another night in CE You didn't call anyone cousin. :( --- Pew pew! <cite>gunplagirl posted [p:912432051] in Transgende... [t:77203442]...</cite> <quote><cite>ProfessorKukui posted...</cite> <quote>Another night in CE</quote> You didn't call anyone cousin. :(</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
PleaseClap 11/15/18 1:55:04 AM #118:	ProfessorKukui posted... Another night in CE Some things never change. I wonder how many times we've had this exact same conversation about this exact same article. 5 times? 10? More? --- Please <cite>PleaseClap posted [p:912432084] in Transgende... [t:77203442]...</cite> <quote><cite>ProfessorKukui posted...</cite> <quote>Another night in CE</quote> Some things never change. I wonder how many times we've had this exact same conversation about this exact same article. 5 times? 10? More?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
_Lyonidias 11/15/18 1:55:06 AM #119:	gunplagirl posted... PleaseClap posted... 0AbsoluteZero0 posted... Nidhoggr posted... DezDroppedFreak posted... Why are you the way you are @gunplagirl You literally chase everyone away that agrees on shit with you by acting like you have a stick up your ass about one nitpicking thing in their position. Its just fucking inflammatory behavior for no reason. gunplagirl is a prime example of someone who tries to be so incredibly progressive that they end up being regressive. For real. Im in favor of transgender rights and all, but gunpla is just repulsive. I could easily see some people here who are on the fence being pushed to the other side thanks to her vitriol. Im gonna stop believing in LGBT rights because this person annoyed me is an interesting take. Spoiler alert they never actually believed in the rights, and even if they did they never actually did anything to fight for those rights like protesting or sending a strongly worded letter to a government official or standing up to bigots. Hell, the "I'm pro LGBT but- types are the same ones who frequently make man in a dress jokes But you and I both know they see nothing wrong with it. Precisely. --- she's a killer queen uwu; the user formerly known as joestarrr <cite>_Lyonidias posted [p:912432085] in Transgende... [t:77203442]...</cite> <quote><cite>gunplagirl posted...</cite> <quote><cite>PleaseClap posted...</cite> <quote><cite>0AbsoluteZero0 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Nidhoggr posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DezDroppedFreak posted...</cite> <quote>Why are you the way you are @gunplagirl You literally chase everyone away that agrees on shit with you by acting like you have a stick up your ass about one nitpicking thing in their position. Its just fucking inflammatory behavior for no reason.</quote> gunplagirl is a prime example of someone who tries to be so incredibly progressive that they end up being regressive.</quote> For real. Im in favor of transgender rights and all, but gunpla is just repulsive. I could easily see some people here who are on the fence being pushed to the other side thanks to her vitriol.</quote> Im gonna stop believing in LGBT rights because this person annoyed me is an interesting take.</quote> Spoiler alert they never actually believed in the rights, and even if they did they never actually did anything to fight for those rights like protesting or sending a strongly worded letter to a government official or standing up to bigots. Hell, the "I'm pro LGBT but- types are the same ones who frequently make man in a dress jokes But you and I both know they see nothing wrong with it.</quote> Precisely.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
0AbsoluteZero0 11/15/18 1:57:48 AM #120:	_Lyonidias posted... gunplagirl posted... PleaseClap posted... 0AbsoluteZero0 posted... Nidhoggr posted... DezDroppedFreak posted... Why are you the way you are @gunplagirl You literally chase everyone away that agrees on shit with you by acting like you have a stick up your ass about one nitpicking thing in their position. Its just fucking inflammatory behavior for no reason. gunplagirl is a prime example of someone who tries to be so incredibly progressive that they end up being regressive. For real. Im in favor of transgender rights and all, but gunpla is just repulsive. I could easily see some people here who are on the fence being pushed to the other side thanks to her vitriol. Im gonna stop believing in LGBT rights because this person annoyed me is an interesting take. Spoiler alert they never actually believed in the rights, and even if they did they never actually did anything to fight for those rights like protesting or sending a strongly worded letter to a government official or standing up to bigots. Hell, the "I'm pro LGBT but- types are the same ones who frequently make man in a dress jokes But you and I both know they see nothing wrong with it. Precisely. Lmfao, as if you can talk. It was barely a week ago on here that you made the people who identify as attack helicopters joke that delegitimizes trans people. Fuck outta here with that. --- -The Admirable <cite>0AbsoluteZero0 posted [p:912432165] in Transgende... [t:77203442]...</cite> <quote><cite>_Lyonidias posted...</cite> <quote><cite>gunplagirl posted...</cite> <quote><cite>PleaseClap posted...</cite> <quote><cite>0AbsoluteZero0 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Nidhoggr posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DezDroppedFreak posted...</cite> <quote>Why are you the way you are @gunplagirl You literally chase everyone away that agrees on shit with you by acting like you have a stick up your ass about one nitpicking thing in their position. Its just fucking inflammatory behavior for no reason.</quote> gunplagirl is a prime example of someone who tries to be so incredibly progressive that they end up being regressive.</quote> For real. Im in favor of transgender rights and all, but gunpla is just repulsive. I could easily see some people here who are on the fence being pushed to the other side thanks to her vitriol.</quote> Im gonna stop believing in LGBT rights because this person annoyed me is an interesting take.</quote> Spoiler alert they never actually believed in the rights, and even if they did they never actually did anything to fight for those rights like protesting or sending a strongly worded letter to a government official or standing up to bigots. Hell, the "I'm pro LGBT but- types are the same ones who frequently make man in a dress jokes But you and I both know they see nothing wrong with it.</quote> Precisely.</quote> Lmfao, as if you can talk. It was barely a week ago on here that you made the people who identify as attack helicopters joke that delegitimizes trans people. Fuck outta here with that.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Medussa 11/15/18 1:59:23 AM #121:	I wonder how much overlap there is for people who say Fox has an unfair advantage and people who say trans people shouldn't transition until they're adults. --- Boom! That's right, this is all happening! You cannot change the channel now! Act now! Venchmen are standing by for your orders! <cite>Medussa posted [p:912432200] in Transgende... [t:77203442]...</cite> <quote>I wonder how much overlap there is for people who say Fox has an unfair advantage and people who say trans people shouldn't transition until they're adults.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
nemu 11/15/18 2:00:40 AM #122:	gunplagirl posted... nemu posted... gunplagirl posted... nemu posted... gunplagirl posted... nemu posted... gunplagirl posted... The sex binary is not a catch all, you're the one ignoring that literal fucking geneticists say on the subject. You must know better than them though, with your zero qualifications. Your only examples are literal deformities, so I'm not too certain on that. They're not even classified as deformities by the appropriate medical fields that they're relevant to. Glad to know you don't actually care about being accurate. Arguing semantics doesn't push a debate forward. Whatever you want to call intersex people, they are plagued by a physical disorder that is not directly related to this topic. They are not part an example of an alternate sex. They do not prove any idea that genitals are not indicative of sex. It's like trying to say there is a spectrum of the number of human fingers because we can technically be born with zero to ten or more. It's not semantics, it's literally the consensus of the relevant medical fields that it's not a deformity. It's entirely semantics. You're acting as if the definition of that word means anything about anything in this discussion. You know what I mean. I know what I mean. It's literally a deformity per the dictionary definition, but people in the academic field likely use other words as they need to rigidly define things. That doesn't change the argument one iota. Bring up wording when it directly affects the core of the argument, not when it makes a good deflection topic. You're the one ignoring the scientific definition in favor of applying a dictionary definition. You're the one being pedantic. But tell me, why does it matter that you are able to reiterate that it's a deformity (which medically, it isn't one)? It only serves to add to your "well we can't actually acknowledge intersex people" argument which again, is running contrary to what the relevant medical fields have to say on the matter. See, you're doing it again. What relevance does that have to the discussion? You need to stop harping on irrelevant wording. We're down three levels on a pointless tangent because of that. You're trying to use it as a tactic to downplay your opponent, but it just makes you look silly. It doesn't really matter what word is used. The point is that the conditions are indicative of anything related to a sex spectrum. It is something on the level of any other condition where someone is born lacking something, born with an extra something, or born with something that looks nothing like it should look naturally. Sex being a spectrum would be people being born fully functioning with a variety of characteristics completely naturally without any kind of issues in the womb. I feel like whatever science you're looking it is for something very specific, but you're trying to apply it too broadly. <cite>nemu posted [p:912432237] in Transgende... [t:77203442]...</cite> <quote><cite>gunplagirl posted...</cite> <quote><cite>nemu posted...</cite> <quote><cite>gunplagirl posted...</cite> <quote><cite>nemu posted...</cite> <quote><cite>gunplagirl posted...</cite> <quote><cite>nemu posted...</cite> <quote><cite>gunplagirl posted...</cite><quote>The sex binary is not a catch all, you're the one ignoring that literal fucking geneticists say on the subject. You must know better than them though, with your zero qualifications.</quote> Your only examples are literal deformities, so I'm not too certain on that.</quote> They're not even classified as deformities by the appropriate medical fields that they're relevant to. Glad to know you don't actually care about being accurate.</quote> Arguing semantics doesn't push a debate forward. Whatever you want to call intersex people, they are plagued by a physical disorder that is not directly related to this topic. They are not part an example of an alternate sex. They do not prove any idea that genitals are not indicative of sex. It's like trying to say there is a spectrum of the number of human fingers because we can technically be born with zero to ten or more.</quote> It's not semantics, it's literally the consensus of the relevant medical fields that it's not a deformity.</quote> It's entirely semantics. You're acting as if the definition of that word means anything about anything in this discussion. You know what I mean. I know what I mean. It's literally a deformity per the dictionary definition, but people in the academic field likely use other words as they need to rigidly define things. That doesn't change the argument one iota. Bring up wording when it directly affects the core of the argument, not when it makes a good deflection topic.</quote> You're the one ignoring the scientific definition in favor of applying a dictionary definition. You're the one being pedantic. But tell me, why does it matter that you are able to reiterate that it's a deformity (which medically, it isn't one)? It only serves to add to your "well we can't actually acknowledge intersex people" argument which again, is running contrary to what the relevant medical fields have to say on the matter.</quote> See, you're doing it again. What relevance does that have to the discussion? You need to stop harping on irrelevant wording. We're down three levels on a pointless tangent because of that. You're trying to use it as a tactic to downplay your opponent, but it just makes you look silly. It doesn't really matter what word is used. The point is that the conditions are indicative of anything related to a sex spectrum. It is something on the level of any other condition where someone is born lacking something, born with an extra something, or born with something that looks nothing like it should look naturally. Sex being a spectrum would be people being born fully functioning with a variety of characteristics completely naturally without any kind of issues in the womb. I feel like whatever science you're looking it is for something very specific, but you're trying to apply it too broadly.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#123	Post #123 was unavailable or deleted.
_Lyonidias 11/15/18 2:01:33 AM #124:	0AbsoluteZero0 posted... _Lyonidias posted... gunplagirl posted... PleaseClap posted... 0AbsoluteZero0 posted... Nidhoggr posted... DezDroppedFreak posted... Why are you the way you are @gunplagirl You literally chase everyone away that agrees on shit with you by acting like you have a stick up your ass about one nitpicking thing in their position. Its just fucking inflammatory behavior for no reason. gunplagirl is a prime example of someone who tries to be so incredibly progressive that they end up being regressive. For real. Im in favor of transgender rights and all, but gunpla is just repulsive. I could easily see some people here who are on the fence being pushed to the other side thanks to her vitriol. Im gonna stop believing in LGBT rights because this person annoyed me is an interesting take. Spoiler alert they never actually believed in the rights, and even if they did they never actually did anything to fight for those rights like protesting or sending a strongly worded letter to a government official or standing up to bigots. Hell, the "I'm pro LGBT but- types are the same ones who frequently make man in a dress jokes But you and I both know they see nothing wrong with it. Precisely. Lmfao, as if you can talk. It was barely a week ago on here that you made the people who identify as attack helicopters joke that delegitimizes trans people. Fuck outta here with that. It was a very tongue in cheek comment directed at people who actually think like that, but I see that it went over your head. I'm one of the most pro-LGBT people on this board, so you might need to "fuck outta here with that". --- she's a killer queen uwu; the user formerly known as joestarrr <cite>_Lyonidias posted [p:912432255] in Transgende... [t:77203442]...</cite> <quote><cite>0AbsoluteZero0 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>_Lyonidias posted...</cite> <quote><cite>gunplagirl posted...</cite> <quote><cite>PleaseClap posted...</cite> <quote><cite>0AbsoluteZero0 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Nidhoggr posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DezDroppedFreak posted...</cite> <quote>Why are you the way you are @gunplagirl You literally chase everyone away that agrees on shit with you by acting like you have a stick up your ass about one nitpicking thing in their position. Its just fucking inflammatory behavior for no reason.</quote> gunplagirl is a prime example of someone who tries to be so incredibly progressive that they end up being regressive.</quote> For real. Im in favor of transgender rights and all, but gunpla is just repulsive. I could easily see some people here who are on the fence being pushed to the other side thanks to her vitriol.</quote> Im gonna stop believing in LGBT rights because this person annoyed me is an interesting take.</quote> Spoiler alert they never actually believed in the rights, and even if they did they never actually did anything to fight for those rights like protesting or sending a strongly worded letter to a government official or standing up to bigots. Hell, the "I'm pro LGBT but- types are the same ones who frequently make man in a dress jokes But you and I both know they see nothing wrong with it.</quote> Precisely.</quote> Lmfao, as if you can talk. It was barely a week ago on here that you made the people who identify as attack helicopters joke that delegitimizes trans people. Fuck outta here with that.</quote> It was a very tongue in cheek comment directed at people who actually think like that, but I see that it went over your head. I'm one of the most pro-LGBT people on this board, so you might need to "fuck outta here with that".</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
gunplagirl 11/15/18 2:02:46 AM #125:	Medussa posted... I wonder how much overlap there is for people who say Fox has an unfair advantage and people who say trans people shouldn't transition until they're adults. The latter is entirely encompassed in the first --- Pew pew! <cite>gunplagirl posted [p:912432294] in Transgende... [t:77203442]...</cite> <quote><cite>Medussa posted...</cite> <quote>I wonder how much overlap there is for people who say Fox has an unfair advantage and people who say trans people shouldn't transition until they're adults.</quote> The latter is entirely encompassed in the first</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
mattnd2007 11/15/18 2:10:57 AM #126:	Popcorn.jpg --- Show me a man who resorts to violence and I'll show you a man who's run out of good ideas Phil Funnie <cite>mattnd2007 posted [p:912432552] in Transgende... [t:77203442]...</cite> <quote>Popcorn.jpg</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dash_Harber 11/15/18 2:11:31 AM #127:	Yeah, someone totally went through all that surgery and hormone therapy, doing irreversible changes to their body, and risking facing serious stigma and risk of being ostracized by not only their friends and family, but also the general public, just to win some MMA fights that they still had to train for because the female fighters are just as fucking tough. Totally makes sense. <cite>Dash_Harber posted [p:912432567] in Transgende... [t:77203442]...</cite> <quote>Yeah, someone totally went through all that surgery and hormone therapy, doing irreversible changes to their body, and risking facing serious stigma and risk of being ostracized by not only their friends and family, but also the general public, just to win some MMA fights that they still had to train for because the female fighters are just as fucking tough. Totally makes sense.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#128	Post #128 was unavailable or deleted.
gunplagirl 11/15/18 2:14:53 AM #129:	Dash_Harber posted... Yeah, someone totally went through all that surgery and hormone therapy, doing irreversible changes to their body, and risking facing serious stigma and risk of being ostracized by not only their friends and family, but also the general public, just to win some MMA fights that they still had to train for because the female fighters are just as fucking tough. Totally makes sense. It's like that one topic earlier about how the homeless actually stay homeless for this sweet handouts, who cares if you lose a finger from hypothermia if it means you can get a free cigarette every now and then --- Pew pew! <cite>gunplagirl posted [p:912432656] in Transgende... [t:77203442]...</cite> <quote><cite>Dash_Harber posted...</cite> <quote>Yeah, someone totally went through all that surgery and hormone therapy, doing irreversible changes to their body, and risking facing serious stigma and risk of being ostracized by not only their friends and family, but also the general public, just to win some MMA fights that they still had to train for because the female fighters are just as fucking tough. Totally makes sense.</quote> It's like that one topic earlier about how the homeless actually stay homeless for this sweet handouts, who cares if you lose a finger from hypothermia if it means you can get a free cigarette every now and then</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KillerKhan420 11/15/18 2:16:24 AM #130:	Nobody is saying all that dash, that's irrelevant. The last part though, yes the females are just as tough mentally as the men, easy. But as tough physically? Hell no. If you had an old school UFC tournament style one night thing and mixed in females with the males, 100% of the time a male would emerge the winner. It's a matter of how men and women are built different. --- "I know how the business works because I'm a wrestling fan"-hulkhogan1 <cite>KillerKhan420 posted [p:912432709] in Transgende... [t:77203442]...</cite> <quote>Nobody is saying all that dash, that's irrelevant. The last part though, yes the females are just as tough mentally as the men, easy. But as tough physically? Hell no. If you had an old school UFC tournament style one night thing and mixed in females with the males, 100% of the time a male would emerge the winner. It's a matter of how men and women are built different.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
IHeartRadiation 11/15/18 2:16:38 AM #131:	Ignoring the rest of the topic's crap, you have to wonder why anyone is interested in joining a sport where you can get your skull cracked. --- I don't get it either. <cite>IHeartRadiation posted [p:912432714] in Transgende... [t:77203442]...</cite> <quote>Ignoring the rest of the topic's crap, you have to wonder why anyone is interested in joining a sport where you can get your skull cracked.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
dave_is_slick 11/15/18 2:17:11 AM #132:	Dash_Harber posted... Yeah, someone totally went through all that surgery and hormone therapy, doing irreversible changes to their body, and risking facing serious stigma and risk of being ostracized by not only their friends and family, but also the general public, just to win some MMA fights that they still had to train for because the female fighters are just as fucking tough. Totally makes sense. Now comes the part where you quote where anyone actually said this so you don't look like you're just pulling shit from your ass. --- The most relaxing version of Aquatic Ambiance I've ever heard: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bl61y1XM7sM <cite>dave_is_slick posted [p:912432726] in Transgende... [t:77203442]...</cite> <quote><cite>Dash_Harber posted...</cite> <quote>Yeah, someone totally went through all that surgery and hormone therapy, doing irreversible changes to their body, and risking facing serious stigma and risk of being ostracized by not only their friends and family, but also the general public, just to win some MMA fights that they still had to train for because the female fighters are just as fucking tough. Totally makes sense.</quote> Now comes the part where you quote where anyone actually said this so you don't look like you're just pulling shit from your ass.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ssjevot 11/15/18 2:17:46 AM #133:	Just have everyone compete together. It's like having divisions based on race or whatever else, no point in doing it, just have everyone compete the same and reward the best athletes. --- Favorite Games: BlazBlue: Central Fiction, Street Fighter III: Third Strike, Bayonetta, Bloodborne thats a username you habe - chuckyhacksss <cite>ssjevot posted [p:912432738] in Transgende... [t:77203442]...</cite> <quote>Just have everyone compete together. It's like having divisions based on race or whatever else, no point in doing it, just have everyone compete the same and reward the best athletes.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dragonblade01 11/15/18 3:03:34 AM #134:	@OctilIery I was slightly mistaken. It was cycling, not track and field. https://www.cyclingweekly.com/news/latest-news/rachel-mckinnon-becomes-first-transgender-woman-win-track-world-title-397473 A couple key quotes: Rachel McKinnon has entered the history books as the first transgender woman to win a cycling world title. McKinnon, who races both on the track and the road, won the womens 35-44 sprint during the UCI Masters Track Cycling World Championships in Los Angeles on Sunday. Dr Rachel McKinnon was born a biological male but identifies as a trans woman and is a campaigner for trans rights. Replying to a tweet by Katie Hopkins, runner up Jennifer Wagner said: I was the third place rider. Its definitely not fair. McKinnon added that Wagner had beaten her in 10 of their last 12 races, including the 500-metre time trial earlier in the week. Transgender athletes have been allowed to compete in the Olympics since 2004 but under the requirement they had undergone gender confirmation surgery and been on hormone therapy for two years. In 2015, these rules were relaxed to remove the need for surgery and the athletes must have a testosterone level below a certain limit for at least 12 months prior to their first competition. Of course, in fairness, the specific regulations that are to be followed for MtF transgender people participating in competition are still very much up for debate. After all, in the same article it mentions that the permissible amount of testosterone will be halved for the 2020 Olympics. <cite>Dragonblade01 posted [p:912433970] in Transgende... [t:77203442]...</cite> <quote>@OctilIery I was slightly mistaken. It was cycling, not track and field. https://www.cyclingweekly.com/news/latest-news/rachel-mckinnon-becomes-first-transgender-woman-win-track-world-title-397473 A couple key quotes: <quote>Rachel McKinnon has entered the history books as the first transgender woman to win a cycling world title. McKinnon, who races both on the track and the road, won the womens 35-44 sprint during the UCI Masters Track Cycling World Championships in Los Angeles on Sunday. Dr Rachel McKinnon was born a biological male but identifies as a trans woman and is a campaigner for trans rights.</quote> <quote>Replying to a tweet by Katie Hopkins, runner up Jennifer Wagner said: I was the third place rider. Its definitely not fair. McKinnon added that Wagner had beaten her in 10 of their last 12 races, including the 500-metre time trial earlier in the week.</quote> <quote>Transgender athletes have been allowed to compete in the Olympics since 2004 but under the requirement they had undergone gender confirmation surgery and been on hormone therapy for two years. In 2015, these rules were relaxed to remove the need for surgery and the athletes must have a testosterone level below a certain limit for at least 12 months prior to their first competition.</quote> Of course, in fairness, the specific regulations that are to be followed for MtF transgender people participating in competition are still very much up for debate. After all, in the same article it mentions that the permissible amount of testosterone will be halved for the 2020 Olympics.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Guide 11/15/18 3:08:38 AM #135:	It doesn't really matter what word is used. The point is that the conditions aren't indicative of anything related to a sex spectrum. It is something on the level of any other condition where someone is born lacking something, born with an extra something, or born with something that looks nothing like it should look naturally. Sex being a spectrum would be people being born fully functioning with a variety of characteristics completely naturally without any kind of issues in the womb. I feel like whatever science you're looking it is for something very specific, but you're trying to apply it too broadly. You need to define your terms before you contradict a common scientific census. Bold, but not smart. --- [ S p e e d b o o s t ] https://youtu.be/Acn5IptKWQU <cite>Guide posted [p:912434111] in Transgende... [t:77203442]...</cite> <quote><quote>It doesn't really matter what word is used. The point is that the conditions aren't indicative of anything related to a sex spectrum. It is something on the level of any other condition where someone is born lacking something, born with an extra something, or born with something that looks nothing like it should look naturally. Sex being a spectrum would be people being born fully functioning with a variety of characteristics completely naturally without any kind of issues in the womb. I feel like whatever science you're looking it is for something very specific, but you're trying to apply it too broadly.</quote> You need to define your terms before you contradict a common scientific census. Bold, but not smart.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kaiganeer 11/15/18 3:17:03 AM #136:	Squall28 posted... Sports should be separated by sex not gender. this is what this whole thing boils down to. there are physiological differences between males and females that no amount of hormone therapy or any current treatment will equalize, and that should be recognized and respected in any and every competitive sport <cite>Kaiganeer posted [p:912434331] in Transgende... [t:77203442]...</cite> <quote><cite>Squall28 posted...</cite> <quote>Sports should be separated by sex not gender.</quote> this is what this whole thing boils down to. there are physiological differences between males and females that no amount of hormone therapy or any current treatment will equalize, and that should be recognized and respected in any and every competitive sport</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
soulunison2 11/15/18 3:24:23 AM #137:	But what about cris cyborg <cite>soulunison2 posted [p:912434502] in Transgende... [t:77203442]...</cite> <quote>But what about cris cyborg</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SchoolForAnts 11/15/18 3:30:34 AM #138:	gunplagirl posted... This is from 2014 And injuries of this nature are common in fighting sports like MMA Stop trying to use these extremely rare events as an excuse to validate your hatred of trans women Bullshit. MMA cracked skulls are not common at all. Theyre basically freak injuries <cite>SchoolForAnts posted [p:912434658] in Transgende... [t:77203442]...</cite> <quote><cite>gunplagirl posted...</cite> <quote>This is from 2014 And injuries of this nature are common in fighting sports like MMA Stop trying to use these extremely rare events as an excuse to validate your hatred of trans women</quote> Bullshit. MMA cracked skulls are not common at all. Theyre basically freak injuries</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SchoolForAnts 11/15/18 3:35:28 AM #139:	KillerKhan420 posted... Nobody is saying all that dash, that's irrelevant. The last part though, yes the females are just as tough mentally as the men, easy. But as tough physically? Hell no. If you had an old school UFC tournament style one night thing and mixed in females with the males, 100% of the time a male would emerge the winner. It's a matter of how men and women are built different. This is a conflicting topic: For one feminists keep insisting that men and women are 100% equal right? #FightLikeAgirl . Well lets see it! They keep insisting that women can be just as tough... time to put their money where their mouth is. Its also funny how they want to mix the sports where convenient (eg nascar). On the other side, who wants to see women get injured and mauled? Certainly not me! Dont listen to the activists and keep men and women separate for sports (that includes trans). Even though a UFC league where hitting in the groin is legal would even things out wouldnt it? Its a 1 hit KO, if not a 1 hit kill. <cite>SchoolForAnts posted [p:912434775] in Transgende... [t:77203442]...</cite> <quote><cite>KillerKhan420 posted...</cite> <quote>Nobody is saying all that dash, that's irrelevant. The last part though, yes the females are just as tough mentally as the men, easy. But as tough physically? Hell no. If you had an old school UFC tournament style one night thing and mixed in females with the males, 100% of the time a male would emerge the winner. It's a matter of how men and women are built different.</quote> This is a conflicting topic: For one feminists keep insisting that men and women are 100% equal right? #FightLikeAgirl . Well lets see it! They keep insisting that women can be just as tough... time to put their money where their mouth is. Its also funny how they want to mix the sports where convenient (eg nascar). On the other side, who wants to see women get injured and mauled? Certainly not me! Dont listen to the activists and keep men and women separate for sports (that includes trans). Even though a UFC league where hitting in the groin is legal would even things out wouldnt it? Its a 1 hit KO, if not a 1 hit kill.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
apolloooo 11/15/18 3:35:41 AM #140:	@Squall28 stop arguing with gunplagirl, she is too far gone to be reasoned with. --- http://i.imgtc.com/iJyp6bF.png http://i.imgtc.com/ZBw36Qh.png Thanks for the peeps that made the pics <3 if i make typos it means i am on phone <cite>apolloooo posted [p:912434781] in Transgende... [t:77203442]...</cite> <quote>@Squall28 stop arguing with gunplagirl, she is too far gone to be reasoned with.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Guide 11/15/18 3:37:59 AM #141:	This doesn't cover skull fractures, but it is a nice analysis. https://www.thejournal.ie/the-journal-factcheck-mma-boxing-safety-injury-2713577-Apr2016/ Though as an MMA fan, I've only heard about skull fractures like, 3 times in the last decade? I could be forgetting, but it's rare enough that you don't hear about it much, unlike the brain damage of boxing. --- [ S p e e d b o o s t ] https://youtu.be/Acn5IptKWQU <cite>Guide posted [p:912434840] in Transgende... [t:77203442]...</cite> <quote>This doesn't cover skull fractures, but it is a nice analysis. https://www.thejournal.ie/the-journal-factcheck-mma-boxing-safety-injury-2713577-Apr2016/ Though as an MMA fan, I've only heard about skull fractures like, 3 times in the last decade? I could be forgetting, but it's rare enough that you don't hear about it much, unlike the brain damage of boxing.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Guide 11/15/18 3:38:51 AM #142:	SchoolForAnts posted... KillerKhan420 posted... Nobody is saying all that dash, that's irrelevant. The last part though, yes the females are just as tough mentally as the men, easy. But as tough physically? Hell no. If you had an old school UFC tournament style one night thing and mixed in females with the males, 100% of the time a male would emerge the winner. It's a matter of how men and women are built different. This is a conflicting topic: For one feminists keep insisting that men and women are 100% equal right? #FightLikeAgirl . Well lets see it! They keep insisting that women can be just as tough... time to put their money where their mouth is. Its also funny how they want to mix the sports where convenient (eg nascar). On the other side, who wants to see women get injured and mauled? Certainly not me! Dont listen to the activists and keep men and women separate for sports (that includes trans). Even though a UFC league where hitting in the groin is legal would even things out wouldnt it? Its a 1 hit KO, if not a 1 hit kill. I don't think anyone here, or most feminists for that matter, insist women are just as physically capable as men. --- [ S p e e d b o o s t ] https://youtu.be/Acn5IptKWQU <cite>Guide posted [p:912434859] in Transgende... [t:77203442]...</cite> <quote><cite>SchoolForAnts posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KillerKhan420 posted...</cite> <quote>Nobody is saying all that dash, that's irrelevant. The last part though, yes the females are just as tough mentally as the men, easy. But as tough physically? Hell no. If you had an old school UFC tournament style one night thing and mixed in females with the males, 100% of the time a male would emerge the winner. It's a matter of how men and women are built different.</quote> This is a conflicting topic: For one feminists keep insisting that men and women are 100% equal right? #FightLikeAgirl . Well lets see it! They keep insisting that women can be just as tough... time to put their money where their mouth is. Its also funny how they want to mix the sports where convenient (eg nascar). On the other side, who wants to see women get injured and mauled? Certainly not me! Dont listen to the activists and keep men and women separate for sports (that includes trans). Even though a UFC league where hitting in the groin is legal would even things out wouldnt it? Its a 1 hit KO, if not a 1 hit kill.</quote> I don't think anyone here, or most feminists for that matter, insist women are just as physically capable as men.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SchoolForAnts 11/15/18 3:44:15 AM #143:	Guide posted... SchoolForAnts posted... KillerKhan420 posted... Nobody is saying all that dash, that's irrelevant. The last part though, yes the females are just as tough mentally as the men, easy. But as tough physically? Hell no. If you had an old school UFC tournament style one night thing and mixed in females with the males, 100% of the time a male would emerge the winner. It's a matter of how men and women are built different. This is a conflicting topic: For one feminists keep insisting that men and women are 100% equal right? #FightLikeAgirl . Well lets see it! They keep insisting that women can be just as tough... time to put their money where their mouth is. Its also funny how they want to mix the sports where convenient (eg nascar). On the other side, who wants to see women get injured and mauled? Certainly not me! Dont listen to the activists and keep men and women separate for sports (that includes trans). Even though a UFC league where hitting in the groin is legal would even things out wouldnt it? Its a 1 hit KO, if not a 1 hit kill. I don't think anyone here, or most feminists for that matter, insist women are just as physically capable as men. #FightLikeAgirl https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XjJQBjWYDTs" data-time=" They even mention fighting specifically <cite>SchoolForAnts posted [p:912434965] in Transgende... [t:77203442]...</cite> <quote><cite>Guide posted...</cite> <quote><cite>SchoolForAnts posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KillerKhan420 posted...</cite> <quote>Nobody is saying all that dash, that's irrelevant. The last part though, yes the females are just as tough mentally as the men, easy. But as tough physically? Hell no. If you had an old school UFC tournament style one night thing and mixed in females with the males, 100% of the time a male would emerge the winner. It's a matter of how men and women are built different.</quote> This is a conflicting topic: For one feminists keep insisting that men and women are 100% equal right? #FightLikeAgirl . Well lets see it! They keep insisting that women can be just as tough... time to put their money where their mouth is. Its also funny how they want to mix the sports where convenient (eg nascar). On the other side, who wants to see women get injured and mauled? Certainly not me! Dont listen to the activists and keep men and women separate for sports (that includes trans). Even though a UFC league where hitting in the groin is legal would even things out wouldnt it? Its a 1 hit KO, if not a 1 hit kill.</quote> I don't think anyone here, or most feminists for that matter, insist women are just as physically capable as men.</quote> #FightLikeAgirl https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XjJQBjWYDTs" data-time=" They even mention fighting specifically</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Guide 11/15/18 3:49:18 AM #144:	I'm not watching a long commercial. Skip to the part where it says women are equally as physically capable as men. --- [ S p e e d b o o s t ] https://youtu.be/Acn5IptKWQU <cite>Guide posted [p:912435074] in Transgende... [t:77203442]...</cite> <quote>I'm not watching a long commercial. Skip to the part where it says women are equally as physically capable as men.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SchoolForAnts 11/15/18 3:59:01 AM #145:	Guide posted... I'm not watching a long commercial. Skip to the part where it says women are equally as physically capable as men. sigh You might as well have replied LALALALALA CANT HEAR YOU! <cite>SchoolForAnts posted [p:912435271] in Transgende... [t:77203442]...</cite> <quote><cite>Guide posted...</cite> <quote>I'm not watching a long commercial. Skip to the part where it says women are equally as physically capable as men.</quote> sigh You might as well have replied LALALALALA CANT HEAR YOU!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
iPhone_7 11/15/18 4:03:56 AM #146:	Women are just as capable as men you **ing misogynist --- Sig User Logic https://imgur.com/lA5fm7w <cite>iPhone_7 posted [p:912435358] in Transgende... [t:77203442]...</cite> <quote>Women are just as capable as men you **ing misogynist</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Guide 11/15/18 4:11:31 AM #147:	SchoolForAnts posted... Guide posted... I'm not watching a long commercial. Skip to the part where it says women are equally as physically capable as men. sigh You might as well have replied LALALALALA CANT HEAR YOU! What? If you yourself watched it, then you would know which part says that, right? Why are you cowering so easily? --- [ S p e e d b o o s t ] https://youtu.be/Acn5IptKWQU <cite>Guide posted [p:912435535] in Transgende... [t:77203442]...</cite> <quote><cite>SchoolForAnts posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Guide posted...</cite> <quote>I'm not watching a long commercial. Skip to the part where it says women are equally as physically capable as men.</quote> sigh You might as well have replied LALALALALA CANT HEAR YOU!</quote> What? If you yourself watched it, then you would know which part says that, right? Why are you cowering so easily?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
jumi 11/15/18 4:39:42 AM #148:	Kaiganeer posted... Squall28 posted... Sports should be separated by sex not gender. this is what this whole thing boils down to. there are physiological differences between males and females that no amount of hormone therapy or any current treatment will equalize, and that should be recognized and respected in any and every competitive sport Science doesn't back you up, but your opinion is noted. --- XBL Gamertag: Rob Thorsman Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/robertvsilvers <cite>jumi posted [p:912436076] in Transgende... [t:77203442]...</cite> <quote><cite>Kaiganeer posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Squall28 posted...</cite> <quote>Sports should be separated by sex not gender.</quote> this is what this whole thing boils down to. there are physiological differences between males and females that no amount of hormone therapy or any current treatment will equalize, and that should be recognized and respected in any and every competitive sport</quote> Science doesn't back you up, but your opinion is noted.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ssjevot 11/15/18 4:55:23 AM #149:	jumi posted... Kaiganeer posted... Squall28 posted... Sports should be separated by sex not gender. this is what this whole thing boils down to. there are physiological differences between males and females that no amount of hormone therapy or any current treatment will equalize, and that should be recognized and respected in any and every competitive sport Science doesn't back you up, but your opinion is noted. Can't tell if trolling: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_differences_in_human_physiology --- Favorite Games: BlazBlue: Central Fiction, Street Fighter III: Third Strike, Bayonetta, Bloodborne thats a username you habe - chuckyhacksss <cite>ssjevot posted [p:912436309] in Transgende... [t:77203442]...</cite> <quote><cite>jumi posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Kaiganeer posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Squall28 posted...</cite> <quote>Sports should be separated by sex not gender.</quote> this is what this whole thing boils down to. there are physiological differences between males and females that no amount of hormone therapy or any current treatment will equalize, and that should be recognized and respected in any and every competitive sport</quote> Science doesn't back you up, but your opinion is noted.</quote> Can't tell if trolling: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_differences_in_human_physiology</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Guide 11/15/18 5:05:15 AM #150:	They might be referring to hormone treatment before puberty? That's the only plausible thing I can think of. --- [break the meta] https://youtu.be/Acn5IptKWQU <cite>Guide posted [p:912436496] in Transgende... [t:77203442]...</cite> <quote>They might be referring to hormone treatment before puberty? That's the only plausible thing I can think of.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7

Current Events > Transgender MMA Fighter Breaks Female Opponent's Skull (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Transgender MMA Fighter Breaks Female Opponent's Skull