Poll of the Day > Hey Kavanaugh. Since you're having so much trouble with a simple answer...

(+) Yeah! (+)

Here's an answer you can use that works perfectly:

I did not have sexual relations with that woman.

Considering that line was a blatant lie the first time it was used, would that be any better than evasive or attempted clarifying answers?


---

ParanoidObsessive posted...

Considering that line was a blatant lie the first time it was used, would that be any better than evasive or attempted clarifying answers?

It'd still be a definite no.

I didn't understand what the definition of is is
---

Hillary lost the election get over it snowflakes
---

WastelandCowboy posted...

It'd still be a definite no.

But would you rather have a definitive answer or a truthful one?


---

He's under oath, so even if it's not an honest one, that's fine. Still got 'em.

ParanoidObsessive posted...

WastelandCowboy posted...

It'd still be a definite no.

But would you rather have a definitive answer or a truthful one?

Yeah. It's a trap either way. If he simply says no then people demand an explanation and assume he's lying. If he clarifies anything then people assume he's talking too much and lying. As far as these things go, its probably best to lean toward the side of minimal speaking until asked for details though. That said I havent watched the entire thing since I actually have better shit to do throughout the day than watch this for hours on end

WastelandCowboy posted...

He's under oath, so even if it's not an honest one, that's fine. Still got 'em.

So what you're saying is, you don't actually care what happened at all, or whether or not he's actually guilty of whatever he's accused of, as much as you want him to "lose" regardless.

Gotcha, agenda acknowledged.


---

ParanoidObsessive posted...

WastelandCowboy posted...

He's under oath, so even if it's not an honest one, that's fine. Still got 'em.

So what you're saying is, you don't actually care what happened at all, or whether or not he's actually guilty of whatever he's accused of, as much as you want him to "lose" regardless.

Gotcha, agenda acknowledged.

Not everyone was blessed with logic.

ParanoidObsessive posted...

WastelandCowboy posted...

He's under oath, so even if it's not an honest one, that's fine. Still got 'em.

So what you're saying is, you don't actually care what happened at all, or whether or not he's actually guilty of whatever he's accused of, as much as you want him to "lose" regardless.

Gotcha, agenda acknowledged.

Good thing I have no intention of political career.

Andromicus posted...

Hillary lost the election get over it snowflakes

I thought the entire Kavanaugh issue was about LGB rights?
---

I wish judge judy was the one asking question. she would go ape shit on his ass and then fine him. I can just see "sir, this calendar isn't proof you raped a person. "

Judy: "How many drink do you think is too much!"

Kavanaugh: "What ever the chart says!"

Judy: "Excuse me? I'll ask you again. This time I want a number."

Judy: Have you ever drank so much that you passed out?

Kavanaugh: "Have you?"

Judy: "I'm asking you! Have you ever drank so much that you passed out?"

Kavanaugh: "I know. Have you?"

Judy: "Get out of here! I find you guilty and disrespectful to the court! You owe the defendant the max penalty of $10,000! Good Day! I said Good Day!"
---