Poll of the Day > War in Syria is all about money "west vs russian allies"

(+) Yeah! (+)

I mean i am sure its also ideological reasons. But its essentially a war on greed. The pipeline they plan on building goes from Kuwait and is suppose to go in Syria to European countries. This is something Assad does not want and so Russians and Iran Shiites support the guy i think.

So its just about money, who controls it essentially. Which i don't want to see so i wish Assad good luck on that, despite not liking dictatorship but i rather have this guy fighting those greedy dirtbags back than letting them take over it.

Skiaking posted...

but i rather have this guy fighting those greedy dirtbags back than letting them take over it.

Lol.
---

Shitposting on alts is tons of fun.
---

Revelation34 posted...

Skiaking posted...

but i rather have this guy fighting those greedy dirtbags back than letting them take over it.

Lol.

So you think war in Syria is justified because the economy?

Every war is a banker's war.
---

Are you syrious?

Ha ha ha, all puns aside though, who cares? That country sounds boring, even their best war is a snoozefest compared to Infinity War.
---

but the founding fathers...

Skiaking posted...

So you think war in Syria is justified because the economy?

Getting rid of somebody who attacks his own people is better than somebody bitching about oil.
---

Revelation34 posted...

Skiaking posted...

So you think war in Syria is justified because the economy?

Getting rid of somebody who attacks his own people is better than somebody bitching about oil.

You mean any middle eastern country in a nutshell?. Theocracy or dictatorship its the same. How about indirectly fund and support democratic voices. But if you wanna work for the globalist war machine then this is for you. And also we should feel sorry for people we bomb by taking them in, thats our way of saying, good job, we killed people so lets help the victims too by bombing and just join more wars that way. How about taking in refugees and not bomb them and send them back when their home is built up and is safe, how about that?

Skiaking posted...

You mean any middle eastern country in a nutshell?. Theocracy or dictatorship its the same. How about indirectly fund and support democratic voices. But if you wanna work for the globalist war machine then this is for you. And also we should feel sorry for people we bomb by taking them in, thats our way of saying, good job, we killed people so lets help the victims too by bombing and just join more wars that way. How about taking in refugees and not bomb them and send them back when their home is built up and is safe, how about that?

Because no country has ever built themselves back up in the history of mankind.
---

Revelation34 posted...

But you say the answer is just take down any dictators you dont like. And then what? What democracy?. Aka its a joke. They themself need to think for themself, maybe stop bombing for the man in the office for the sake of money on globalist expense, so i feel little sorry for western allies getting beaten for this, they are despicable in my view, its a war on greed not rights.

Skiaking posted...

But you say the answer is just take down any dictators you dont like. And then what? What democracy?. Aka its a joke. They themself need to think for themself, maybe stop bombing for the man in the office for the sake of money on globalist expense, so i feel little sorry for western allies getting beaten for this, they are despicable in my view, its a war on greed not rights.

Yeah it's much better to leave dictators who attack their own people in power.
---

Revelation34 posted...

Skiaking posted...

But you say the answer is just take down any dictators you dont like. And then what? What democracy?. Aka its a joke. They themself need to think for themself, maybe stop bombing for the man in the office for the sake of money on globalist expense, so i feel little sorry for western allies getting beaten for this, they are despicable in my view, its a war on greed not rights.

Yeah it's much better to leave dictators who attack their own people in power.

Sure beats creating more warlords.

It's not simply a matter of greed, there's also influence at play. The US and other nations have a strong history of overthrowing hostile regimes to put in friendlier (often-puppet) governments. That said, there *are* some genuine concerns in regards to how the war is being carried out although the bulk of the problem is that foreign nations have exacerbated the conflict to promote their personal interests and, more generally, those same nations (especially the US) are responsible for destabilizing the region and enabling much of the conflict in the first place.

Revelation34 posted...

Skiaking posted...

So you think war in Syria is justified because the economy?

Getting rid of somebody who attacks his own people is better than somebody bitching about oil.

...you mean his people who are attacking him? The nation is in the middle of a foreign-backed civil war. If another nation was arming groups to take down our government, you'd better believe that the president -- no matter who it is -- would fight against the rebels and there would certainly be collateral damage. However, it's tougher to do that to the US because we have a stronger surveillance network and better infrastructure -- things these other nations lack.
---

bashar al asaad was on t.v. in 2016
his people did not want to over throw him
just like the people in libya
western people beleive everything they see on t.v. and they believe in 'moderate fanatics'

Zeus posted...

...you mean his people who are attacking him? The nation is in the middle of a foreign-backed civil war. If another nation was arming groups to take down our government, you'd better believe that the president -- no matter who it is -- would fight against the rebels and there would certainly be collateral damage. However, it's tougher to do that to the US because we have a stronger surveillance network and better infrastructure -- things these other nations lack.

Chemical warfare is illegal worldwide.
---

why would al-assad gas his own people with cholrine gas if he was already winning?
the people were happy, 100k of them and all the christians came back they were outside partying once the gov't took back control
you guys fall way too easily into state sponsered media, the heads of those networks worked in the CIA at one point

War is about money???

GASP
---

RoboXgp89 posted...

why would al-assad gas his own people with cholrine gas if he was already winning?
the people were happy, 100k of them and all the christians came back they were outside partying once the gov't took back control
you guys fall way too easily into state sponsered media, the heads of those networks worked in the CIA at one point

How's Alex Jones?
---

Revelation34 posted...

RoboXgp89 posted...

why would al-assad gas his own people with cholrine gas if he was already winning?
the people were happy, 100k of them and all the christians came back they were outside partying once the gov't took back control
you guys fall way too easily into state sponsered media, the heads of those networks worked in the CIA at one point

How's Alex Jones?

if Alex Jones is the only non-biased source you watch then you got problems
the war is being funded by the u.s., saudi's and u.k.
you can't trust journalism from these people when they don't even have reporters working in the country they're attacking lol

iRoboXgp89 posted...

if Alex Jones is the only non-biased source you watch then you got problems
the war is being funded by the u.s., saudi's and u.k.
you can't trust journalism from these people when they don't even have reporters working in the country they're attacking lol

http://i0.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/facebook/000/008/305/its-a-conspiracy.jpg
---

Revelation34 posted...

iRoboXgp89 posted...

if Alex Jones is the only non-biased source you watch then you got problems
the war is being funded by the u.s., saudi's and u.k.
you can't trust journalism from these people when they don't even have reporters working in the country they're attacking lol

http://i0.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/facebook/000/008/305/its-a-conspiracy.jpg

Every news is truth nowadays

Revelation34 posted...

Zeus posted...

...you mean his people who are attacking him? The nation is in the middle of a foreign-backed civil war. If another nation was arming groups to take down our government, you'd better believe that the president -- no matter who it is -- would fight against the rebels and there would certainly be collateral damage. However, it's tougher to do that to the US because we have a stronger surveillance network and better infrastructure -- things these other nations lack.

Chemical warfare is illegal worldwide.

Already addressed in an earlier part of that same post unless you're just tossing out non sequiturs to which I'd respond an umbrella is useful in the rain.
---

Zeus posted...

Already addressed in an earlier part of that same post unless you're just tossing out non sequiturs to which I'd respond an umbrella is useful in the rain.

You didn't mention illegal weapons.
---

Revelation34 posted...

Zeus posted...

Already addressed in an earlier part of that same post unless you're just tossing out non sequiturs to which I'd respond an umbrella is useful in the rain.

You didn't mention illegal weapons.

Zeus posted...

That said, there *are* some genuine concerns in regards to how the war is being carried out

---