Poll of the Day > Kid from 2030 says Trump will be RE-ELECTED and PASSED a LIE DETECTOR TEST!!!

(+) Yeah! (+)

A "time traveller" named NOah, who says he's from the FUTURE has supposedly passed a LIE DETECTOR TEST and claimed Donald Trump will be RE-ELECTED in 2020 and that Artificial Intelligence will TAKE OVER!!

It was posted on Apex TV as the video blurred his face and distorted his voice to hide his identity claiming he "risked his life to travel back in time"

Apex TV says it's one of the "biggest voices of paranormal content on Youtube" with 56 million views and 100,000 subscribers

He says his mission is to tell those alive now what the world has in store

Among his "predictions" his claim is that Google Glass style robots will spread across the globe and take away jobs and that technology has developed so fast that they will independently run a home.

Bitcoi will become increasingly poplar but pennies and cents will still be in use

In 2030, the US president is a mysterious figure caleld "Ilana Remikee"

He also said Global Warming is REAL and caused temperatures in North America to increase while Europe has cooled.

Humans will reach Mars in 2028 and that year time travel is discovered.

Electric Cars will travel as fast as diesel and petrol ones and many forms of cancer will be CURED.

Of course the video has gave into skepticism, mainly because of the him being strapped with a polygraph lie detector wrapped around his bicep as he's asked to predict future major events and to confirm who really is. The first question was "Are you an actual time traveller from the year 2030"

He responds with "yes" and it's marked TRUE in a large green letters superimposed on the video but the results of the machine are not shown..

He claims he has "hard evidence" to back up his prediction but isn't sure he can say because it might cause a "paradox"

Lie detector tets do not say if things are objectively true but that the person who is making the claim believes that they are true

Do you believe this crap? let's see if people do

"Noah" - Whacko Tobacco

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2018/02/13/16/492D2C9300000578-5386759-image-a-29_1518538874743.jpg

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2018/02/13/16/492D2C8300000578-5386759-image-m-31_1518538889322.jpg
---

1.There is a 97% chance a president will be reelected if not impeached.
2.Lie detector tests are unreliable as they only test if someone thinks they're lying
3. Global Warming IS real, and this is a deliberate false equivalence - since everything else he says is a lie, throw some curveballs in there
4. Electric Cars already can travel as fast as contemporary vehicles

Actually, do I even need to go on... it's not hard to predict the future when it's already currently true
---

I believe in the future shitty teen mom's will have moved on from Aiden variations to naming their kids NOah. Time travel confirmed.

Lokarin posted...

1.There is a 97% chance a president will be reelected if not impeached.

That's not even close to right.
---

Full Throttle posted...

He claims he has "hard evidence" to back up his prediction but isn't sure he can say because it might cause a "paradox"

Like a fucking kid really has that much insight about time travel paradoxes (if it did even exist)
---

Meanwhile I'm from the year 2525 and nobody wants to hear about giant robots conquering the surface world.

Full Throttle posted...

Lie detector tets do not say if things are objectively true but that the person who is making the claim believes that they are true

---

Golden Road posted...

Lokarin posted...

1.There is a 97% chance a president will be reelected if not impeached.

That's not even close to right.

It's a function of small sample sizes
---

I don't think there's anyone even here crazy enough to believe that.
---

Lokarin posted...

It's a function of small sample sizes

So where do you get the 97% figure from, anyway? Do you have evidence that, in thousands of future Presidential elections, about 97% of incumbents will win? Or did you just pull the number out of thin air?
---

The Mars one is literally impossible. We don't have that kind of technology yet.
---

Golden Road posted...

Lokarin posted...

It's a function of small sample sizes

So where do you get the 97% figure from, anyway? Do you have evidence that, in thousands of future Presidential elections, about 97% of incumbents will win? Or did you just pull the number out of thin air?

It's just a bad-math at whatever 43 in 44 is
---

Theres a reason the criminal justice system does not rely on lie detectors

If a scientific method actually existed to accurately determine when people were telling the truth or not, it would reshape our entire society
---

I'm from 2018 and it's the current year