Current Events > people on ce literally think 100k is rich?

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3
andel 02/08/18 7:30:31 PM #1:	wtf, i can't believe people like that exist. 100k a year is lower middle class in nyc or san francisco, upper middle class in flyover states. someone isn't truly rich unless they have a net worth in the millions fyi --- I am thinking about just walking into the river now that Megaupload is gone and condoms are in porn.-Fubonis <cite>andel posted [p:895728662] in people on ... [t:76298858]...</cite> <quote>wtf, i can't believe people like that exist. 100k a year is lower middle class in nyc or san francisco, upper middle class in flyover states. someone isn't truly rich unless they have a net worth in the millions fyi</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Antifar 02/08/18 7:35:13 PM #2:	Is this individual, or family? --- kin to all that throbs <cite>Antifar posted [p:895728891] in people on ... [t:76298858]...</cite> <quote>Is this individual, or family?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
andel 02/08/18 7:39:58 PM #3:	Antifar posted... Is this individual, or family? either. a single adult in san fran making 100k can live with some luxury but is far from rich or wealthy --- I am thinking about just walking into the river now that Megaupload is gone and condoms are in porn.-Fubonis <cite>andel posted [p:895729134] in people on ... [t:76298858]...</cite> <quote><cite>Antifar posted...</cite> <quote>Is this individual, or family?</quote> either. a single adult in san fran making 100k can live with some luxury but is far from rich or wealthy</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
FightingGames 02/08/18 7:41:20 PM #4:	andel posted... 100k a year is lower middle class in nyc or san francisco well no shit, sherlock --- https://my.mixtape.moe/xmsgxb.jpg <cite>FightingGames posted [p:895729206] in people on ... [t:76298858]...</cite> <quote><cite>andel posted...</cite> <quote>100k a year is lower middle class in nyc or san francisco</quote> well no shit, sherlock</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
K181 02/08/18 7:41:59 PM #5:	I don't think anybody thinks that unless the person lives in some bumfuck rural area with an insanely low cost of living. --- The poster formerly known as Kakarot181: July 2, 2002 - March 14, 2012. Irregardless, for all intensive purposes, I could care less. <cite>K181 posted [p:895729250] in people on ... [t:76298858]...</cite> <quote>I don't think anybody thinks that unless the person lives in some bumfuck rural area with an insanely low cost of living.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
andel 02/08/18 7:42:05 PM #6:	FightingGames posted... andel posted... 100k a year is lower middle class in nyc or san francisco well no shit, sherlock hence 100k is no where near rich --- I am thinking about just walking into the river now that Megaupload is gone and condoms are in porn.-Fubonis <cite>andel posted [p:895729257] in people on ... [t:76298858]...</cite> <quote><cite>FightingGames posted...</cite> <quote><cite>andel posted...</cite> <quote>100k a year is lower middle class in nyc or san francisco</quote> well no shit, sherlock</quote> hence 100k is no where near rich</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
andel 02/08/18 7:42:48 PM #7:	K181 posted... I don't think anybody thinks that unless the person lives in some bumfuck rural area with an insanely low cost of living. i wouldn't think so but people in another topic on the first page seem to be insisting it is wealthy which is absurd to me --- I am thinking about just walking into the river now that Megaupload is gone and condoms are in porn.-Fubonis <cite>andel posted [p:895729300] in people on ... [t:76298858]...</cite> <quote><cite>K181 posted...</cite> <quote>I don't think anybody thinks that unless the person lives in some bumfuck rural area with an insanely low cost of living.</quote> i wouldn't think so but people in another topic on the first page seem to be insisting it is wealthy which is absurd to me</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Antifar 02/08/18 7:43:43 PM #8:	andel posted... either. a single adult in san fran making 100k can live with some luxury but is far from rich or wealthy But they sure as hell aren't "lower middle class" in a city where the median household income is 103k --- kin to all that throbs <cite>Antifar posted [p:895729352] in people on ... [t:76298858]...</cite> <quote><cite>andel posted...</cite> <quote>either. a single adult in san fran making 100k can live with some luxury but is far from rich or wealthy </quote> But they sure as hell aren't "lower middle class" in a city where the median household income is 103k</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
xAzNPimP4LiFex 02/08/18 7:45:05 PM #9:	Its not rich but theyre really well off if they pull in that kind of cash assuming they dont live in the cities you listed like SF or NYC --- Pimpin ain't as easy as ya fellas think it is so don't front on me like that SON! <cite>xAzNPimP4LiFex posted [p:895729434] in people on ... [t:76298858]...</cite> <quote>Its not rich but theyre really well off if they pull in that kind of cash assuming they dont live in the cities you listed like SF or NYC</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DoctorVader 02/08/18 7:46:46 PM #10:	$100k is not rich, but it's still pretty damn good and definitely not lower middle class in NYC. Maybe midtown Manhattan, but not the rest of city nor the surrounding Tristate area. You can live very comfortably with a lot of luxury. --- It all just disappears, doesn't it? Everything you are, gone in a moment, like breath on a mirror. - The Doctor <cite>DoctorVader posted [p:895729539] in people on ... [t:76298858]...</cite> <quote>$100k is not rich, but it's still pretty damn good and definitely not lower middle class in NYC. Maybe midtown Manhattan, but not the rest of city nor the surrounding Tristate area. You can live very comfortably with a lot of luxury.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
COVxy 02/08/18 7:47:07 PM #11:	Antifar posted... median household income is 103k Median is much lower, that's the mean. --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] <cite>COVxy posted [p:895729556] in people on ... [t:76298858]...</cite> <quote><cite>Antifar posted...</cite> <quote>median household income is 103k</quote> Median is much lower, that's the mean.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
chrono625 02/08/18 7:50:11 PM #12:	DoctorVader posted... $100k is not rich, but it's still pretty damn good and definitely not lower middle class in NYC. Maybe midtown Manhattan, but not the rest of city nor the surrounding Tristate area. You can live very comfortably with a lot of luxury. Lol no. The housing market is becoming out of control in queens and Brooklyn and even Staten island. 1800sqft homes are going for 700k and 7k a year in taxes in Staten island. Single family homes in Brooklyn are over a million in most desirable areas. Do you know many people with 140k-200k to put down on a home? --- http://i.imgur.com/Rqk1DYV.gif - Super Bowl XXI/XXV/XLII/XLVI Champions - NY Giants Eli Manning SB tracker: 2/2 Superbowls 2/2 SBMVP's <cite>chrono625 posted [p:895729723] in people on ... [t:76298858]...</cite> <quote><cite>DoctorVader posted...</cite> <quote>$100k is not rich, but it's still pretty damn good and definitely not lower middle class in NYC. Maybe midtown Manhattan, but not the rest of city nor the surrounding Tristate area. You can live very comfortably with a lot of luxury.</quote> Lol no. The housing market is becoming out of control in queens and Brooklyn and even Staten island. 1800sqft homes are going for 700k and 7k a year in taxes in Staten island. Single family homes in Brooklyn are over a million in most desirable areas. Do you know many people with 140k-200k to put down on a home?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
AmonAmarth 02/08/18 7:51:26 PM #13:	upper middle class. maybe low upper class (depending if they have already a home paid off and stuff). --- i7-4790@ 3.6GHZ \| GA-Z97-HD3 \| ASUS GTX 960 2GB \| Samsung 850 EVO 250GB \| 1TB HDD \| CX750M \| 12GB DDR3 <cite>AmonAmarth posted [p:895729796] in people on ... [t:76298858]...</cite> <quote>upper middle class. maybe low upper class (depending if they have already a home paid off and stuff).</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Sativa_Rose 02/08/18 7:52:26 PM #14:	chrono625 posted... Lol no. The housing market is becoming out of control in queens and Brooklyn and even Staten island. 1800sqft homes are going for 700k and 7k a year in taxes in Staten island. Single family homes in Brooklyn are over a million in most desirable areas. Do you know many people with 140k-200k to put down on a home? The housing market has actually been cooling off in Brooklyn lately, I think there was a lot of new construction over the past several years. But buying in general is gonna be a lot harder than renting these days, there's just so much capital out there. --- I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister. <cite>Sativa_Rose posted [p:895729842] in people on ... [t:76298858]...</cite> <quote><cite>chrono625 posted...</cite> <quote>Lol no. The housing market is becoming out of control in queens and Brooklyn and even Staten island. 1800sqft homes are going for 700k and 7k a year in taxes in Staten island. Single family homes in Brooklyn are over a million in most desirable areas. Do you know many people with 140k-200k to put down on a home? </quote> The housing market has actually been cooling off in Brooklyn lately, I think there was a lot of new construction over the past several years. But buying in general is gonna be a lot harder than renting these days, there's just so much capital out there.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
chrono625 02/08/18 7:54:19 PM #15:	Sativa_Rose posted... chrono625 posted... Lol no. The housing market is becoming out of control in queens and Brooklyn and even Staten island. 1800sqft homes are going for 700k and 7k a year in taxes in Staten island. Single family homes in Brooklyn are over a million in most desirable areas. Do you know many people with 140k-200k to put down on a home? The housing market has actually been cooling off in Brooklyn lately, I think there was a lot of new construction over the past several years. But buying in general is gonna be a lot harder than renting these days, there's just so much capital out there. The market from what I last heard is just as aggressive as ever. I work with an older gentleman who lives in bensonhurst who gets offers pretty frequently on his home. He said he was appraised for 1 million for his home and comps in the area have been the same. --- http://i.imgur.com/Rqk1DYV.gif - Super Bowl XXI/XXV/XLII/XLVI Champions - NY Giants Eli Manning SB tracker: 2/2 Superbowls 2/2 SBMVP's <cite>chrono625 posted [p:895729939] in people on ... [t:76298858]...</cite> <quote><cite>Sativa_Rose posted...</cite> <quote><cite>chrono625 posted...</cite> <quote>Lol no. The housing market is becoming out of control in queens and Brooklyn and even Staten island. 1800sqft homes are going for 700k and 7k a year in taxes in Staten island. Single family homes in Brooklyn are over a million in most desirable areas. Do you know many people with 140k-200k to put down on a home? </quote> The housing market has actually been cooling off in Brooklyn lately, I think there was a lot of new construction over the past several years. But buying in general is gonna be a lot harder than renting these days, there's just so much capital out there.</quote> The market from what I last heard is just as aggressive as ever. I work with an older gentleman who lives in bensonhurst who gets offers pretty frequently on his home. He said he was appraised for 1 million for his home and comps in the area have been the same.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
COVxy 02/08/18 7:54:27 PM #16:	chrono625 posted... The housing market is becoming out of control in queens and Brooklyn and even Staten island. 1800sqft homes are going for 700k and 7k a year in taxes in Staten island. Single family homes in Brooklyn are over a million in most desirable areas. Do you know many people with 140k-200k to put down on a home? Do you actually know of many people who own a home in Brooklyn? Or why anyone would need to? Like, it's literally a selection factor. The city selects for rich. You are not locked into living in the city and buying a home in the city, most people who work in the city commute into the city. Like, how does this conversation unironically go to "I cannot buy things that are pretty much reserved for the ultra rich, therefore I'm lower middle class at best,"? --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] <cite>COVxy posted [p:895729947] in people on ... [t:76298858]...</cite> <quote><cite>chrono625 posted...</cite> <quote>The housing market is becoming out of control in queens and Brooklyn and even Staten island. 1800sqft homes are going for 700k and 7k a year in taxes in Staten island. Single family homes in Brooklyn are over a million in most desirable areas. Do you know many people with 140k-200k to put down on a home?</quote> Do you actually know of many people who own a home in Brooklyn? Or why anyone would need to? Like, it's literally a selection factor. The city selects for rich. You are not locked into living in the city and buying a home in the city, most people who work in the city commute into the city. Like, how does this conversation unironically go to "I cannot buy things that are pretty much reserved for the ultra rich, therefore I'm lower middle class at best,"?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DoctorVader 02/08/18 8:02:30 PM #17:	chrono625 posted... DoctorVader posted... $100k is not rich, but it's still pretty damn good and definitely not lower middle class in NYC. Maybe midtown Manhattan, but not the rest of city nor the surrounding Tristate area. You can live very comfortably with a lot of luxury. Lol no. The housing market is becoming out of control in queens and Brooklyn and even Staten island. 1800sqft homes are going for 700k and 7k a year in taxes in Staten island. Single family homes in Brooklyn are over a million in most desirable areas. Do you know many people with 140k-200k to put down on a home? Average is more like $500k and $3-4k in taxes inside the city. Which is way cheaper than even the surrounding suburbs like Nassau, Westchester or Central NJ. It's also been pretty much that for years. I own property in Queens and know tons and tons of people throughout the entire city and the Tristate area that have amazing houses, are doing excellent with everything and they are mostly making $70-$120k. The richer people I know that make $200k-$500k are actually mostly living on rent, with property in other states. --- It all just disappears, doesn't it? Everything you are, gone in a moment, like breath on a mirror. - The Doctor <cite>DoctorVader posted [p:895730361] in people on ... [t:76298858]...</cite> <quote><cite>chrono625 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DoctorVader posted...</cite> <quote>$100k is not rich, but it's still pretty damn good and definitely not lower middle class in NYC. Maybe midtown Manhattan, but not the rest of city nor the surrounding Tristate area. You can live very comfortably with a lot of luxury.</quote> Lol no. The housing market is becoming out of control in queens and Brooklyn and even Staten island. 1800sqft homes are going for 700k and 7k a year in taxes in Staten island. Single family homes in Brooklyn are over a million in most desirable areas. Do you know many people with 140k-200k to put down on a home?</quote> Average is more like $500k and $3-4k in taxes inside the city. Which is way cheaper than even the surrounding suburbs like Nassau, Westchester or Central NJ. It's also been pretty much that for years. I own property in Queens and know tons and tons of people throughout the entire city and the Tristate area that have amazing houses, are doing excellent with everything and they are mostly making $70-$120k. The richer people I know that make $200k-$500k are actually mostly living on rent, with property in other states.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
legendarylemur 02/08/18 8:10:55 PM #18:	Think of all the chicken 100k can buy --- "Iwata was awesome" - Mr. Nintendo Click here to unlock the meaning of life! <cite>legendarylemur posted [p:895730748] in people on ... [t:76298858]...</cite> <quote>Think of all the chicken 100k can buy</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Vita_Aeterna 02/08/18 8:12:18 PM #19:	No one in anyone's right mind would voluntarily live in San Fran or New York. --- "Bear Island knows no king but the King in the North, whose name is STARK." <cite>Vita_Aeterna posted [p:895730806] in people on ... [t:76298858]...</cite> <quote>No one in anyone's right mind would voluntarily live in San Fran or New York.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kazi1212 02/08/18 8:13:53 PM #20:	DoctorVader posted... chrono625 posted... DoctorVader posted... $100k is not rich, but it's still pretty damn good and definitely not lower middle class in NYC. Maybe midtown Manhattan, but not the rest of city nor the surrounding Tristate area. You can live very comfortably with a lot of luxury. Lol no. The housing market is becoming out of control in queens and Brooklyn and even Staten island. 1800sqft homes are going for 700k and 7k a year in taxes in Staten island. Single family homes in Brooklyn are over a million in most desirable areas. Do you know many people with 140k-200k to put down on a home? Average is more like $500k and $3-4k in taxes inside the city. Which is way cheaper than even the surrounding suburbs like Nassau, Westchester or Central NJ. It's also been pretty much that for years. I own property in Queens and know tons and tons of people throughout the entire city and the Tristate area that have amazing houses, are doing excellent with everything and they are mostly making $70-$120k. The richer people I know that make $200k-$500k are actually mostly living on rent, with property in other states. Same here, I know tons of people in the city who own homes and they arent even making $100k. Perhaps the economic climate is different now, but during the Bush years home ownership increased considerably because of the lending situation --- I don't know my gimmick <cite>Kazi1212 posted [p:895730886] in people on ... [t:76298858]...</cite> <quote><cite>DoctorVader posted...</cite> <quote><cite>chrono625 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DoctorVader posted...</cite> <quote>$100k is not rich, but it's still pretty damn good and definitely not lower middle class in NYC. Maybe midtown Manhattan, but not the rest of city nor the surrounding Tristate area. You can live very comfortably with a lot of luxury.</quote> Lol no. The housing market is becoming out of control in queens and Brooklyn and even Staten island. 1800sqft homes are going for 700k and 7k a year in taxes in Staten island. Single family homes in Brooklyn are over a million in most desirable areas. Do you know many people with 140k-200k to put down on a home?</quote> Average is more like $500k and $3-4k in taxes inside the city. Which is way cheaper than even the surrounding suburbs like Nassau, Westchester or Central NJ. It's also been pretty much that for years. I own property in Queens and know tons and tons of people throughout the entire city and the Tristate area that have amazing houses, are doing excellent with everything and they are mostly making $70-$120k. The richer people I know that make $200k-$500k are actually mostly living on rent, with property in other states.</quote> Same here, I know tons of people in the city who own homes and they arent even making $100k. Perhaps the economic climate is different now, but during the Bush years home ownership increased considerably because of the lending situation</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
HyunA 02/08/18 8:15:40 PM #21:	Shit, when you are in the red, 100k can be considered 'rich' --- *HyunA!* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oTXCgR93zC8 <cite>HyunA posted [p:895730985] in people on ... [t:76298858]...</cite> <quote>Shit, when you are in the red, 100k can be considered 'rich'</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
PrettyBoyFloyd 02/08/18 8:19:19 PM #22:	Vita_Aeterna posted... No one in anyone's right mind would voluntarily live in San Fran or New York. --- The Evil Republicans - Est.2004 - WoT [Government Destabilizing Branch] <cite>PrettyBoyFloyd posted [p:895731208] in people on ... [t:76298858]...</cite> <quote><cite>Vita_Aeterna posted...</cite> <quote>No one in anyone's right mind would voluntarily live in San Fran or New York.</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Antifar 02/08/18 8:32:52 PM #23:	COVxy posted... Antifar posted... median household income is 103k Median is much lower, that's the mean. No, that's median for SF --- kin to all that throbs <cite>Antifar posted [p:895731892] in people on ... [t:76298858]...</cite> <quote><cite>COVxy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Antifar posted...</cite> <quote>median household income is 103k</quote> Median is much lower, that's the mean.</quote> No, that's median for SF</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
andel 02/08/18 8:34:07 PM #24:	HyunA posted... Shit, when you are in the red, 100k can be considered 'rich' nah, rich generally means you can stop working and live in luxury the rest of your life. someone with 100k can't come close to doing that --- I am thinking about just walking into the river now that Megaupload is gone and condoms are in porn.-Fubonis <cite>andel posted [p:895731969] in people on ... [t:76298858]...</cite> <quote><cite>HyunA posted...</cite> <quote>Shit, when you are in the red, 100k can be considered 'rich'</quote> nah, rich generally means you can stop working and live in luxury the rest of your life. someone with 100k can't come close to doing that</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
COVxy 02/08/18 8:35:42 PM #25:	Antifar posted... COVxy posted... Antifar posted... median household income is 103k Median is much lower, that's the mean. No, that's median for SF Google says that's average, but I haven't really felt the need to investigate any further. --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] <cite>COVxy posted [p:895732058] in people on ... [t:76298858]...</cite> <quote><cite>Antifar posted...</cite> <quote><cite>COVxy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Antifar posted...</cite> <quote>median household income is 103k</quote> Median is much lower, that's the mean.</quote> No, that's median for SF</quote> Google says that's average, but I haven't really felt the need to investigate any further.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
andel 02/08/18 8:36:31 PM #26:	any way you slice it 100k is middle class at best, whether upper or lower. by no stretch is it wealthy anywhere in the us --- I am thinking about just walking into the river now that Megaupload is gone and condoms are in porn.-Fubonis <cite>andel posted [p:895732098] in people on ... [t:76298858]...</cite> <quote>any way you slice it 100k is middle class at best, whether upper or lower. by no stretch is it wealthy anywhere in the us</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
furb 02/08/18 8:44:01 PM #27:	I am from rural west virginia. 100k is rich back home. It is like way more than thr average household income. --- You know how fads are. Today it's brains, tomorrow, pierced tongues. Then the next day, pierced brains. -Jane Lane <cite>furb posted [p:895732538] in people on ... [t:76298858]...</cite> <quote>I am from rural west virginia. 100k is rich back home. It is like way more than thr average household income.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
r4X0r 02/08/18 8:45:05 PM #28:	HyunA posted... Shit, when you are in the red, 100k can be considered 'rich' Precisely. It's all about perspective. To somebody making $20,000, $100,000 is rich. To somebody making $250,000, that person making $100,000 is barely scraping by. --- Smiled as fierce as a forty pounder. <cite>r4X0r posted [p:895732587] in people on ... [t:76298858]...</cite> <quote><cite>HyunA posted...</cite> <quote>Shit, when you are in the red, 100k can be considered 'rich'</quote> Precisely. It's all about perspective. To somebody making $20,000, $100,000 is rich. To somebody making $250,000, that person making $100,000 is barely scraping by.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Vindris_SNH 02/08/18 8:47:52 PM #29:	Being rich is subjective. --- glitteringfairy: Just build the damn wall ThyCorndog: and how exactly will that stop the mexican space program from orbital dropping illegal immigrants? <cite>Vindris_SNH posted [p:895732736] in people on ... [t:76298858]...</cite> <quote>Being rich is subjective.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
PrettyBoyFloyd 02/08/18 9:18:50 PM #30:	Vindris_SNH posted... Being rich is subjective. Yea when I grew up being poor meant the Government payed your rent and bought you your food. You bought your clothing from the Salvation Army and wore clothes your older classmates tossed out the previous year. You went to school wearing two different shoes with old electrical cording for shoestrings. --- The Evil Republicans - Est.2004 - WoT [Government Destabilizing Branch] <cite>PrettyBoyFloyd posted [p:895734422] in people on ... [t:76298858]...</cite> <quote><cite>Vindris_SNH posted...</cite> <quote>Being rich is subjective.</quote> Yea when I grew up being poor meant the Government payed your rent and bought you your food. You bought your clothing from the Salvation Army and wore clothes your older classmates tossed out the previous year. You went to school wearing two different shoes with old electrical cording for shoestrings.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CasualGuy 02/08/18 9:20:58 PM #31:	I consider that rich, yes. The average American makes what, 30k per year? So over 3x the average is rich imo despite some places like NYC/SanFran being insanely expensive. --- http://i.imgur.com/MoE9O68.gif <cite>CasualGuy posted [p:895734527] in people on ... [t:76298858]...</cite> <quote>I consider that rich, yes. The average American makes what, 30k per year? So over 3x the average is rich imo despite some places like NYC/SanFran being insanely expensive.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
thanosibe 02/08/18 9:30:28 PM #32:	PrettyBoyFloyd posted... Vita_Aeterna posted... No one in anyone's right mind would voluntarily live in San Fran or New York. Why is it threads about wealth people equate the entire country's cost of living on the two most luxuriously expensive cities in the US to troll? --- I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski <cite>thanosibe posted [p:895735038] in people on ... [t:76298858]...</cite> <quote><cite>PrettyBoyFloyd posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Vita_Aeterna posted...</cite> <quote>No one in anyone's right mind would voluntarily live in San Fran or New York.</quote></quote>Why is it threads about wealth people equate the entire country's cost of living on the two most luxuriously expensive cities in the US to troll?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
andel 02/08/18 9:38:25 PM #33:	CasualGuy posted... I consider that rich, yes. The average American makes what, 30k per year? So over 3x the average is rich imo despite some places like NYC/SanFran being insanely expensive. rich is being able to retire and live in luxury, not making double or triple the poverty line --- I am thinking about just walking into the river now that Megaupload is gone and condoms are in porn.-Fubonis <cite>andel posted [p:895735418] in people on ... [t:76298858]...</cite> <quote><cite>CasualGuy posted...</cite> <quote>I consider that rich, yes. The average American makes what, 30k per year? So over 3x the average is rich imo despite some places like NYC/SanFran being insanely expensive.</quote> rich is being able to retire and live in luxury, not making double or triple the poverty line</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Soviet_Poland 02/08/18 9:43:22 PM #34:	COVxy posted... Antifar posted... median household income is 103k Median is much lower, that's the mean. This is important to note too, since the median is less affected by extreme outliers. --- "He has two neurons held together by a spirochete." <cite>Soviet_Poland posted [p:895735674] in people on ... [t:76298858]...</cite> <quote><cite>COVxy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Antifar posted...</cite> <quote>median household income is 103k</quote> Median is much lower, that's the mean.</quote> This is important to note too, since the median is less affected by extreme outliers.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
refmon 02/08/18 9:47:26 PM #35:	half of CE are neets what do you expect --- If you read this signature, then that meant that I had control of what you read for 5 SECONDS!! <cite>refmon posted [p:895735896] in people on ... [t:76298858]...</cite> <quote>half of CE are neets what do you expect</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
foreveraIone 02/08/18 9:53:11 PM #36:	man imagine I won a 500 million dollar lottery. think of all the pussy I would be getting. --- http://i.imgtc.com/qieELu9.jpg Always. Edgy. <cite>foreveraIone posted [p:895736206] in people on ... [t:76298858]...</cite> <quote>man imagine I won a 500 million dollar lottery. think of all the pussy I would be getting.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SuperMariano3 02/08/18 9:57:36 PM #37:	That porn guy that used to post here has like 20 million. Pull out a lot of his coins from crypto markets last year. --- You can take my Karma, but you'll never take......MY FREEDOM! <cite>SuperMariano3 posted [p:895736441] in people on ... [t:76298858]...</cite> <quote>That porn guy that used to post here has like 20 million. Pull out a lot of his coins from crypto markets last year.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Vita_Aeterna 02/08/18 9:57:45 PM #38:	thanosibe posted... PrettyBoyFloyd posted... Vita_Aeterna posted... No one in anyone's right mind would voluntarily live in San Fran or New York. Why is it threads about wealth people equate the entire country's cost of living on the two most luxuriously expensive cities in the US to troll? Lol, it really is aggravating, isn't it? Why do people think people actually WANT to live in these places? Like, if you're making $100k, maybe you'd have the brains to realize that living in an expensive city will only rob you off your earnings. I'm pretty sure you can live pretty well with $100k in Vancouver, and Vancouver is seen as one of the best cities to live in the world, usually in the consistent top 3 for the past decade. If you have no choice but to stay, then that sucks for you. --- "Bear Island knows no king but the King in the North, whose name is STARK." <cite>Vita_Aeterna posted [p:895736450] in people on ... [t:76298858]...</cite> <quote><cite>thanosibe posted...</cite> <quote><cite>PrettyBoyFloyd posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Vita_Aeterna posted...</cite> <quote>No one in anyone's right mind would voluntarily live in San Fran or New York.</quote></quote>Why is it threads about wealth people equate the entire country's cost of living on the two most luxuriously expensive cities in the US to troll?</quote> Lol, it really is aggravating, isn't it? Why do people think people actually WANT to live in these places? Like, if you're making $100k, maybe you'd have the brains to realize that living in an expensive city will only rob you off your earnings. I'm pretty sure you can live pretty well with $100k in Vancouver, and Vancouver is seen as one of the best cities to live in the world, usually in the consistent top 3 for the past decade. If you have no choice but to stay, then that sucks for you.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
r4X0r 02/08/18 10:04:59 PM #39:	Living in New York City or San Francisco still has a lot of variables. If you want to live in Midtown Manhattan, yeah, you might spend $1.5 million dollars on a one bedroom 900 square foot condo. I can't really speak for San Fran because I've never been or lived there, but my wife owns a place in Queens, NYC. There's plenty of places for sale in that neighborhood between $200,000 and $300,000. You don't have to own a car, no amenity is more than two blocks away. It's relatively cheap living compared to central New Jersey where we live. We keep the Queens place just because it doesn't cost that much. --- Smiled as fierce as a forty pounder. <cite>r4X0r posted [p:895736832] in people on ... [t:76298858]...</cite> <quote>Living in New York City or San Francisco still has a lot of variables. If you want to live in Midtown Manhattan, yeah, you might spend $1.5 million dollars on a one bedroom 900 square foot condo. I can't really speak for San Fran because I've never been or lived there, but my wife owns a place in Queens, NYC. There's plenty of places for sale in that neighborhood between $200,000 and $300,000. You don't have to own a car, no amenity is more than two blocks away. It's relatively cheap living compared to central New Jersey where we live. We keep the Queens place just because it doesn't cost that much.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
chrono625 02/08/18 10:06:29 PM #40:	Vita_Aeterna posted... thanosibe posted... PrettyBoyFloyd posted... Vita_Aeterna posted... No one in anyone's right mind would voluntarily live in San Fran or New York. Why is it threads about wealth people equate the entire country's cost of living on the two most luxuriously expensive cities in the US to troll? Lol, it really is aggravating, isn't it? Why do people think people actually WANT to live in these places? Like, if you're making $100k, maybe you'd have the brains to realize that living in an expensive city will only rob you off your earnings. I'm pretty sure you can live pretty well with $100k in Vancouver, and Vancouver is seen as one of the best cities to live in the world, usually in the consistent top 3 for the past decade. If you have no choice but to stay, then that sucks for you. You're all assuming everyone can just pack up and leave without thinking about all the intangibles that go into making that major decision. What I get from these topics is always the same. "100k is rich." "Not true, cost of living differs all over the country" "If you can't afford to live in an expensive area then just move." "But you just said 100k was rich money." "Well of course not in major cities...just move!" "You can't assume my job where I am will have the same pay or demand if I move. I also have family where I am." "Suck it up." --- http://i.imgur.com/Rqk1DYV.gif - Super Bowl XXI/XXV/XLII/XLVI Champions - NY Giants Eli Manning SB tracker: 2/2 Superbowls 2/2 SBMVP's <cite>chrono625 posted [p:895736902] in people on ... [t:76298858]...</cite> <quote><cite>Vita_Aeterna posted...</cite> <quote><cite>thanosibe posted...</cite> <quote><cite>PrettyBoyFloyd posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Vita_Aeterna posted...</cite> <quote>No one in anyone's right mind would voluntarily live in San Fran or New York.</quote></quote>Why is it threads about wealth people equate the entire country's cost of living on the two most luxuriously expensive cities in the US to troll?</quote> Lol, it really is aggravating, isn't it? Why do people think people actually WANT to live in these places? Like, if you're making $100k, maybe you'd have the brains to realize that living in an expensive city will only rob you off your earnings. I'm pretty sure you can live pretty well with $100k in Vancouver, and Vancouver is seen as one of the best cities to live in the world, usually in the consistent top 3 for the past decade. If you have no choice but to stay, then that sucks for you.</quote> You're all assuming everyone can just pack up and leave without thinking about all the intangibles that go into making that major decision. What I get from these topics is always the same. "100k is rich." "Not true, cost of living differs all over the country" "If you can't afford to live in an expensive area then just move." "But you just said 100k was rich money." "Well of course not in major cities...just move!" "You can't assume my job where I am will have the same pay or demand if I move. I also have family where I am." "Suck it up."</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
thanosibe 02/08/18 10:11:22 PM #41:	chrono625 posted... Vita_Aeterna posted... thanosibe posted... PrettyBoyFloyd posted... Vita_Aeterna posted... No one in anyone's right mind would voluntarily live in San Fran or New York. Why is it threads about wealth people equate the entire country's cost of living on the two most luxuriously expensive cities in the US to troll? Lol, it really is aggravating, isn't it? Why do people think people actually WANT to live in these places? Like, if you're making $100k, maybe you'd have the brains to realize that living in an expensive city will only rob you off your earnings. I'm pretty sure you can live pretty well with $100k in Vancouver, and Vancouver is seen as one of the best cities to live in the world, usually in the consistent top 3 for the past decade. If you have no choice but to stay, then that sucks for you. You're all assuming everyone can just pack up and leave without thinking about all the intangibles that go into making that major decision. What I get from these topics is always the same. "100k is rich." "Not true, cost of living differs all over the country" "If you can't afford to live in an expensive area then just move." "But you just said 100k was rich money." "Well of course not in major cities...just move!" "You can't assume my job where I am will have the same pay or demand if I move. I also have family where I am." "Suck it up." I agree. It's not an all or nothing situation. It's just "lol 100k isn't rich in NYC and SF lol". So what that accounts for 20%? of the US population. So the other 80%? could live luxuriously on 100k? Kind of negates most of the debate about what is rich and what isn't. --- I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski <cite>thanosibe posted [p:895737158] in people on ... [t:76298858]...</cite> <quote><cite>chrono625 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Vita_Aeterna posted...</cite> <quote><cite>thanosibe posted...</cite> <quote><cite>PrettyBoyFloyd posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Vita_Aeterna posted...</cite> <quote>No one in anyone's right mind would voluntarily live in San Fran or New York.</quote></quote>Why is it threads about wealth people equate the entire country's cost of living on the two most luxuriously expensive cities in the US to troll?</quote> Lol, it really is aggravating, isn't it? Why do people think people actually WANT to live in these places? Like, if you're making $100k, maybe you'd have the brains to realize that living in an expensive city will only rob you off your earnings. I'm pretty sure you can live pretty well with $100k in Vancouver, and Vancouver is seen as one of the best cities to live in the world, usually in the consistent top 3 for the past decade. If you have no choice but to stay, then that sucks for you.</quote> You're all assuming everyone can just pack up and leave without thinking about all the intangibles that go into making that major decision. What I get from these topics is always the same. "100k is rich." "Not true, cost of living differs all over the country" "If you can't afford to live in an expensive area then just move." "But you just said 100k was rich money." "Well of course not in major cities...just move!" "You can't assume my job where I am will have the same pay or demand if I move. I also have family where I am." "Suck it up."</quote>I agree. It's not an all or nothing situation. It's just "lol 100k isn't rich in NYC and SF lol". So what that accounts for 20%? of the US population. So the other 80%? could live luxuriously on 100k? Kind of negates most of the debate about what is rich and what isn't.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
COVxy 02/08/18 10:13:09 PM #42:	chrono625 posted... "You can't assume my job where I am will have the same pay or demand if I move. I also have family where I am." I mean, most people who work in cities live outside the city lol. --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] <cite>COVxy posted [p:895737259] in people on ... [t:76298858]...</cite> <quote><cite>chrono625 posted...</cite> <quote>"You can't assume my job where I am will have the same pay or demand if I move. I also have family where I am."</quote> I mean, most people who work in cities live outside the city lol.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Vita_Aeterna 02/08/18 10:14:07 PM #43:	Well there's nothing to do about it. You just live with it like every other poor African lives with their life? Meanwhile people elsewhere that make $100k live pretty comfortably. Is it fair? No. You know the answer to this already. $100k isn't UPPER class in any HDI countries I don't think, but it's wealthy in a "I can drive a nice car, own a decent home with a wife, kids and take annual vacations" rich no problem type. --- "Bear Island knows no king but the King in the North, whose name is STARK." <cite>Vita_Aeterna posted [p:895737318] in people on ... [t:76298858]...</cite> <quote>Well there's nothing to do about it. You just live with it like every other poor African lives with their life? Meanwhile people elsewhere that make $100k live pretty comfortably. Is it fair? No. You know the answer to this already. $100k isn't UPPER class in any HDI countries I don't think, but it's wealthy in a "I can drive a nice car, own a decent home with a wife, kids and take annual vacations" rich no problem type.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
chrono625 02/08/18 10:14:35 PM #44:	COVxy posted... chrono625 posted... "You can't assume my job where I am will have the same pay or demand if I move. I also have family where I am." I mean, most people who work in cities live outside the city lol. For the argument of NYC...No, they don't. --- http://i.imgur.com/Rqk1DYV.gif - Super Bowl XXI/XXV/XLII/XLVI Champions - NY Giants Eli Manning SB tracker: 2/2 Superbowls 2/2 SBMVP's <cite>chrono625 posted [p:895737352] in people on ... [t:76298858]...</cite> <quote><cite>COVxy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>chrono625 posted...</cite> <quote>"You can't assume my job where I am will have the same pay or demand if I move. I also have family where I am."</quote> I mean, most people who work in cities live outside the city lol.</quote> For the argument of NYC...No, they don't.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Romes187 02/08/18 10:14:35 PM #45:	@andel - it's because most on ce aren't really normal people and they don't realize how living an actual life with a wife, kids, etc gets expensive I mean...I want to see pics of Covxy. I really want to <cite>Romes187 posted [p:895737353] in people on ... [t:76298858]...</cite> <quote>@andel - it's because most on ce aren't really normal people and they don't realize how living an actual life with a wife, kids, etc gets expensive I mean...I want to see pics of Covxy. I really want to</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
COVxy 02/08/18 10:16:25 PM #46:	chrono625 posted... For the argument of NYC...No, they don't. Strange how suburbs naturally sprout around cities. Like, you rent an apartment in the city if you want to stay in the city. If you work in NYC and decide you want property, you go to NJ or Long Island. --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] <cite>COVxy posted [p:895737467] in people on ... [t:76298858]...</cite> <quote><cite>chrono625 posted...</cite> <quote>For the argument of NYC...No, they don't.</quote> Strange how suburbs naturally sprout around cities. Like, you rent an apartment in the city if you want to stay in the city. If you work in NYC and decide you want property, you go to NJ or Long Island.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
thanosibe 02/08/18 10:18:06 PM #47:	Romes187 posted... @andel - it's because most on ce aren't really normal people and they don't realize how living an actual life with a wife, kids, etc gets expensive I mean...I want to see pics of Covxy. I really want to I support a wife and two kids on my lone salary. I know. And I don't make 100k. Transversely a lot CE isn't normal and haven't held a job yet in their 20's to 30's and like to troll. (Not accusing TC of that though.) --- I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski <cite>thanosibe posted [p:895737577] in people on ... [t:76298858]...</cite> <quote><cite>Romes187 posted...</cite> <quote>@andel - it's because most on ce aren't really normal people and they don't realize how living an actual life with a wife, kids, etc gets expensive I mean...I want to see pics of Covxy. I really want to</quote>I support a wife and two kids on my lone salary. I know. And I don't make 100k. Transversely a lot CE isn't normal and haven't held a job yet in their 20's to 30's and like to troll. (Not accusing TC of that though.)</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
foreveraIone 02/08/18 10:20:28 PM #48:	you're not really rich unless you can regularly fuck beautiful Asian women to your hearts content --- http://i.imgtc.com/qieELu9.jpg Always. Edgy. <cite>foreveraIone posted [p:895737719] in people on ... [t:76298858]...</cite> <quote>you're not really rich unless you can regularly fuck beautiful Asian women to your hearts content</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
FFVII_REMAKE 02/08/18 10:20:46 PM #49:	Even the homeless people in cities make more than that. <cite>FFVII_REMAKE posted [p:895737732] in people on ... [t:76298858]...</cite> <quote>Even the homeless people in cities make more than that.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CasualGuy 02/08/18 10:29:28 PM #50:	andel posted... CasualGuy posted... I consider that rich, yes. The average American makes what, 30k per year? So over 3x the average is rich imo despite some places like NYC/SanFran being insanely expensive. rich is being able to retire and live in luxury, not making double or triple the poverty line You should easily be able to retire and live well if you earn 100k+ for a lot of your career. Brad Pitt money is just absurd wealth. --- http://i.imgur.com/MoE9O68.gif <cite>CasualGuy posted [p:895738255] in people on ... [t:76298858]...</cite> <quote><cite>andel posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CasualGuy posted...</cite> <quote>I consider that rich, yes. The average American makes what, 30k per year? So over 3x the average is rich imo despite some places like NYC/SanFran being insanely expensive.</quote> rich is being able to retire and live in luxury, not making double or triple the poverty line</quote> You should easily be able to retire and live well if you earn 100k+ for a lot of your career. Brad Pitt money is just absurd wealth.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3

Current Events > people on ce literally think 100k is rich? (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > people on ce literally think 100k is rich?